吉林农业大学主要乔灌木滞尘能力研究
|
摘要
通过对吉林农业大学校园内及其缓冲带27种常见绿化树种的滞尘能力进行测定,分析比较同一绿化植物在不同街区和不同植物在同一街道的滞尘能力,结果表明不同绿化树种的滞尘能力差异明显。单位叶面积滞尘能力是灌木类>乔木类,灌木类的小叶丁香(10.325 2～16.561 2 g/m~2),东北珍珠梅(4.224 4～4.638 9 g/m~2)滞尘效果最好,接骨木,榆叶梅,紫丁香、茶条槭次之,皂角滞尘效果最差。乔木类的桃叶卫矛滞尘效果最好,黄檗,稠李滞尘效果次之,加杨、白桦、水曲柳、山荆子效果较差。
The dust retention ability of 27 common green trees in the campus of Jilin Agricultural University and its buffer zone were measured, the dust tolerance of the same green plant in different neighborhoods and different plants in the same street were analyzed and compared.The results showed that the dust retention capacity of different green trees were different.The dust retention of shrubs were greater than that of arbor. Dust retention of Sytinga microphylla(10.325 2-16.561 2 g/m~2), Sorbaria sorbifolia(4.224 4-4.638 9 g/m~2) were better than other plants, followed by Sambucus williamsii, Prunus triloba,Syringa oblata,Acer ginnala, Malus baccata was the worst. Euonymus bungeanus Maxim. had the best dust retention effect, followed by Phellodendron amurense and Prunus padus, Populus canadensis, Betula platyphylla,Fraxinus mandshurica,Mauls baccata were poor.
The dust retention ability of 27 common green trees in the campus of Jilin Agricultural University and its buffer zone were measured, the dust tolerance of the same green plant in different neighborhoods and different plants in the same street were analyzed and compared.The results showed that the dust retention capacity of different green trees were different.The dust retention of shrubs were greater than that of arbor. Dust retention of Sytinga microphylla(10.325 2-16.561 2 g/m~2), Sorbaria sorbifolia(4.224 4-4.638 9 g/m~2) were better than other plants, followed by Sambucus williamsii, Prunus triloba,Syringa oblata,Acer ginnala, Malus baccata was the worst. Euonymus bungeanus Maxim. had the best dust retention effect, followed by Phellodendron amurense and Prunus padus, Populus canadensis, Betula platyphylla,Fraxinus mandshurica,Mauls baccata were poor.
引文
[1] 云南大学生物系.植物生态学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1980.
[2] 程政红,吴际友,刘云国,等.岳阳市主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究[J].中国城市林业,2004(2):37-40.
[3] 柴一新,祝宁,韩焕金.城市绿化树种的滞尘效应:以哈尔滨市为例[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1121-1126.
[4] 张新献,古润泽,陈自新,等.北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(4):12-17.
[5] 吴中能,于一苏,边艳霞.合肥主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究初报[J].安徽农业科学,2001,29(6):780-783.
[6] 池春月.临汾市区大气环境污染成因及防治对策[J].内蒙古电大学刊,2004(4):19-20.
[7] 戴锋,刘剑秋,方玉霖,等.福建师范大学旗山校区主要绿化植物的滞尘效应[J].福建林业科技,2010,37(1):53-58.
[8] 黄慧娟.保定常见绿化植物滞尘效应及尘污染对其光合特征的影响[D].保定:河北农业大学,2008.
[9] 陈虹,阿衣巴提·托列吾,张立宇.新疆农业大学校园主要绿化植物滞尘能力初探[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(26):12521-12522,12612.
[10] 王赞红,李纪标.城市街道常绿灌木植物叶片滞尘能力及滞尘颗粒物形态[J].生态环境,2006,15(2):327-330.
[11] 石登红,黄静,杨爱玲,等.优贵阳学院主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J ].贵阳学院学报(自然科学版),2014,9(1):75-78.
[2] 程政红,吴际友,刘云国,等.岳阳市主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究[J].中国城市林业,2004(2):37-40.
[3] 柴一新,祝宁,韩焕金.城市绿化树种的滞尘效应:以哈尔滨市为例[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1121-1126.
[4] 张新献,古润泽,陈自新,等.北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(4):12-17.
[5] 吴中能,于一苏,边艳霞.合肥主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究初报[J].安徽农业科学,2001,29(6):780-783.
[6] 池春月.临汾市区大气环境污染成因及防治对策[J].内蒙古电大学刊,2004(4):19-20.
[7] 戴锋,刘剑秋,方玉霖,等.福建师范大学旗山校区主要绿化植物的滞尘效应[J].福建林业科技,2010,37(1):53-58.
[8] 黄慧娟.保定常见绿化植物滞尘效应及尘污染对其光合特征的影响[D].保定:河北农业大学,2008.
[9] 陈虹,阿衣巴提·托列吾,张立宇.新疆农业大学校园主要绿化植物滞尘能力初探[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(26):12521-12522,12612.
[10] 王赞红,李纪标.城市街道常绿灌木植物叶片滞尘能力及滞尘颗粒物形态[J].生态环境,2006,15(2):327-330.
[11] 石登红,黄静,杨爱玲,等.优贵阳学院主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J ].贵阳学院学报(自然科学版),2014,9(1):75-78.