呼包鄂城市群城镇化与生态环境协调发展研究
|
摘要
以呼包鄂城市群为研究对象,通过构建城镇化与生态环境协调发展评价指标体系,运用综合评价模型、耦合度及耦合协调模型,对呼包鄂城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展的变化趋势展开分析.研究结果表明:呼包鄂城市群城镇化发展水平与生态环境协调水平不断提高,但生态环境水平滞后于城镇化发展水平;城镇化与生态环境协调发展水平逐步提高,耦合协调度由低度协调阶段发展为中度协调阶段,但协调发展程度仍然偏低.
In this research,we first established an evaluation index system of coordinated development of urbanization and eco-environment and then took Huhhot-Baotou-Erdos(Hu-Bao-E) as the case urban agglomeration to analyze the changing of coupling and coordination development of the urbanization and eco-environment using the comprehensive evaluation model together with coupling degree and coupling coordination model.The result showed that the comprehensive development level of urbanization and eco-environment respectively increased continuously in the Hu-Bao-E urban agglomeration,but the devopment level of eco-environment lagged behind that of urbanization relatively.Although the degree of coupling coordination of urbanization and eco-environment had improved from a low-level coordination stage to a moderately coordinated stage,the degree of coordinated development was still low.
In this research,we first established an evaluation index system of coordinated development of urbanization and eco-environment and then took Huhhot-Baotou-Erdos(Hu-Bao-E) as the case urban agglomeration to analyze the changing of coupling and coordination development of the urbanization and eco-environment using the comprehensive evaluation model together with coupling degree and coupling coordination model.The result showed that the comprehensive development level of urbanization and eco-environment respectively increased continuously in the Hu-Bao-E urban agglomeration,but the devopment level of eco-environment lagged behind that of urbanization relatively.Although the degree of coupling coordination of urbanization and eco-environment had improved from a low-level coordination stage to a moderately coordinated stage,the degree of coordinated development was still low.
引文
[1] Grossman G,Krueger A.Economic growth and the environment [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377.
[2] Adnan K,Yavuz Selman D.CO2 emissions,economic growth,energy consumption,trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries:A panel data analysis [J].Economic Modelling,2015,44(6):97-103.
[3] Dogan E,Turkekul B.CO2 emissions,real output,energy consumption,trade,urbanization and financial development:testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA [J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23(2):1203-1213.
[4] 方创琳,周成虎,顾朝林,等.特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径 [J].地理学报,2016,71(4):531-550.
[5] 刘耀彬,李仁东,张守忠.城镇化与生态环境协调标准及其评价模型研究 [J].中国软科学,2005(5):140-148.
[6] 唐茂钢,王克强.经济发展、土地城镇化与环境质量 [J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(2):137-147.
[7] 苏海红.中国三江源区城镇化与生态环境耦合发展路径研究 [J].青海社会科学,2016(1):47-52.
[8] 胡彪,张旭东,程达,等.京津冀地区城镇化效率与生态效率时空耦合关系研究 [J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(8):56-62.
[9] 张佩佩,董锁成,李泽红,等.甘南藏族自治州城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系 [J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(1):33-38.
[10] 黄河东.中国城市群城镇化与生态环境协调发展比较 [J].生态经济,2016,32(4):45-48.
[11] 刘艳艳,王少剑.珠三角地区城市化与生态环境的交互胁迫关系及耦合协调度 [J].人文地理,2015,30(3):64-71.
[12] 吕越,陈忠清.浙江省城市化与生态环境协调度及其胁迫关系探讨 [J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(3):160-164.
[13] 王国惠.新型城镇化与生态环境协调发展关系探究 [J].经济问题,2018(3):112-117.
[14] 王会芝.京津冀城市群经济社会与生态环境协调发展研究 [J].经济与管理,2017,31(5):22-26.
[15] 彭建,吴健生,潘雅婧,等.基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架 [J].地理科学进展,2012,31(7):933-940.
[16] 孙黄平,黄震方,徐冬冬,等.泛长三角城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合的空间特征与驱动机制 [J].经济地理,2017,37(2):163-170+186.
[2] Adnan K,Yavuz Selman D.CO2 emissions,economic growth,energy consumption,trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries:A panel data analysis [J].Economic Modelling,2015,44(6):97-103.
[3] Dogan E,Turkekul B.CO2 emissions,real output,energy consumption,trade,urbanization and financial development:testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA [J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23(2):1203-1213.
[4] 方创琳,周成虎,顾朝林,等.特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径 [J].地理学报,2016,71(4):531-550.
[5] 刘耀彬,李仁东,张守忠.城镇化与生态环境协调标准及其评价模型研究 [J].中国软科学,2005(5):140-148.
[6] 唐茂钢,王克强.经济发展、土地城镇化与环境质量 [J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(2):137-147.
[7] 苏海红.中国三江源区城镇化与生态环境耦合发展路径研究 [J].青海社会科学,2016(1):47-52.
[8] 胡彪,张旭东,程达,等.京津冀地区城镇化效率与生态效率时空耦合关系研究 [J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(8):56-62.
[9] 张佩佩,董锁成,李泽红,等.甘南藏族自治州城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系 [J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(1):33-38.
[10] 黄河东.中国城市群城镇化与生态环境协调发展比较 [J].生态经济,2016,32(4):45-48.
[11] 刘艳艳,王少剑.珠三角地区城市化与生态环境的交互胁迫关系及耦合协调度 [J].人文地理,2015,30(3):64-71.
[12] 吕越,陈忠清.浙江省城市化与生态环境协调度及其胁迫关系探讨 [J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(3):160-164.
[13] 王国惠.新型城镇化与生态环境协调发展关系探究 [J].经济问题,2018(3):112-117.
[14] 王会芝.京津冀城市群经济社会与生态环境协调发展研究 [J].经济与管理,2017,31(5):22-26.
[15] 彭建,吴健生,潘雅婧,等.基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架 [J].地理科学进展,2012,31(7):933-940.
[16] 孙黄平,黄震方,徐冬冬,等.泛长三角城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合的空间特征与驱动机制 [J].经济地理,2017,37(2):163-170+186.