用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于土地利用变化的高阳县生态系统服务价值和碳排放风险研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Ecosystem Service Value and Carbon Emission Risk of Gaoyang County Based on Land Use Change
  • 作者:汤峰 ; 殷彦玲 ; 张蓬涛 ; 白宁
  • 英文作者:TANG Feng;YIN Yanling;ZHANG Pengtao;BAI Ning;College of Land and Resources, Hebei Agricultural University;Gaoyang County Federation of Industry and Commerce;Key Lab for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province;
  • 关键词:土地利用变化 ; 生态系统服务价值 ; 土地碳排放风险 ; 高阳县
  • 英文关键词:land use change;;ecosystem service value;;land carbon emission risk;;Gaoyang County
  • 中文刊名:水土保持研究
  • 英文刊名:Research of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 机构:河北农业大学国土资源学院;高阳县工商业联合会;河北省农田生态环境重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-17
  • 出版单位:水土保持研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:河北省社会科学基金“河北省低山丘陵区未利用地转型的生态风险评估与调控研究”(HB18GL053)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:271-277
  • 页数:7
  • CN:61-1272/P
  • ISSN:1005-3409
  • 分类号:F301.24;X24
摘要
研究土地利用变化下区域生态系统服务价值和土地碳排放风险的变化,对于了解土地利用变化的生态环境响应,促进区域经济与环境的协调发展,实现低碳土地利用具有重要意义。以高阳县为研究区,基于2009年和2016年土地利用数据,利用网格法划分评价单元,运用模型法定量评价了生态系统服务价值和土地碳排放风险,并分析了时空演变特征,最后对二者进行了相关性分析。结果表明:2009—2016年高阳县土地利用变化特点为建设用地迅速扩张、水域等生态类用地大量减少;生态系统服务价值总体偏低且研究期间呈下降趋势,县域东中部地区整体高于西部地区;土地碳排放风险总体偏低但在研究期间呈上升趋势,县域中西部地区整体高于北部和东南部地区;土地碳排放风险与生态系统服务价值存在显著负相关关系,表明生态系统服务分析在土地利用碳排放研究中应用的可能。
        Study of the changes of regional ecosystem service value and land carbon emission risk under land use change has great significance for understanding the ecological environment response of land use change, promoting the coordinated development of regional economy and environment, and achieving low carbon land use. We took Gaoyang County as the research area. Based on the land use data of 2009 and 2016, we used the grid method to divide the evaluation unit, and used the model method to quantitatively evaluate the ecosystem service value and land carbon emission risk, then analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics, and finally analyzed the correlation between the two. The results showed that the characteristics of land use change in Gaoyang County were the rapid expansion of construction land and the reduction of ecological land use such as water area from 2009 to 2016. The ecosystem services value was generally low and declined during the study period, it was higher in eastern and central areas of the county than the western area. The land carbon emission risk was generally low but rose during the study period, it was higher in the western and central areas of the county than the north and southeast area. There was a significant negative correlation between the land carbon emission risk and the ecosystem service value, indicating the possibility of application of ecosystem service analysis to land use carbon emission research.
引文
[1] 熊鹰,张方明,龚长安,等.LUCC影响下湖南省生态系统服务价值时空演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(6):1397-1408.
    [2] 马晓哲,王铮.土地利用变化对区域碳源汇的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(17):5898-5907.
    [3] Costanza R,D′Arge R,Groot R D,et al.The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].World Environment,1997,25(1):3-15.
    [4] 赵士洞,张永明.生态系统评估的概念、内涵及挑战—介绍《生态系统与人类福利:评估框架》[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(4):650-657.
    [5] Lautenbach S,Kugel C,Lausch A,et al.Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data[J].Ecological Indicators,2011,11(2):676-687.
    [6] Groot R D,Brander L,Ploeg S V D,et al.Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units[J].Ecosystem Services,2012,1(1):50-61.
    [7] Wei S,Deng X Z,Yuan Y W,et al.Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain[J].Ecological Modelling,2015,318(24):245-253.
    [8] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
    [9] Gos P,Lavorel S.Stakeholders′expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity[J].International Journal of Biodiversity Science,Ecosystem Services and Management,2012,8(1):1-14.
    [10] 张皓玮,方斌,魏巧巧,等.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化模型构建:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(1):63-70.
    [11] 李涛,甘德欣,杨知建,等.土地利用变化影响下洞庭湖地区生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(12):3787-3796.
    [12] 汤峰,张蓬涛,张贵军,等.基于生态敏感性和生态系统服务价值的昌黎县生态廊道构建[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2675-2684.
    [13] 袁凯华,梅昀,陈银蓉,等.中国建设用地集约利用与碳排放效率的时空演变与影响机制[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1882-1895.
    [14] 王渊刚,罗格平,冯异星,等.近50 a玛纳斯河流域土地利用/覆被变化对碳储量的影响[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(6):994-1006.
    [15] 李玉玲,李世平,祁静静.陕西省土地利用碳排放影响因素及脱钩效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):382-390.
    [16] 文枫,鲁春阳.重庆市土地利用碳排放效应时空格局分异[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):257-262.
    [17] 赖力.中国土地利用碳排放效益研究[D].南京:南京大学,2010.
    [18] 周璟茹,赵华甫,吴金华.关中城市群土地集约利用与碳排放关系演化特征研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(11):55-61.
    [19] 路昌,雷国平,周浩,等.松嫩平原肇源县土地利用结构低碳优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):310-315.
    [20] 魏媛,吴长勇.喀斯特贫困山区土地利用碳排放效应及风险研究:以贵州省为例[J].生态经济,2018,34(3):31-36.
    [21] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-915.
    [22] 宗跃光,陈红春,郭瑞华,等.地域生态系统服务的价值结构分析[J].地理研究,2000,19(2):148-155.
    [23] 李晓赛,朱永明,赵丽,等.基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):373-381.
    [24] 王宗明,梁银丽.植被净第一性生产力模型研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(2):104-107.
    [25] Wilson M A,Carpenter S R.Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States:1971—1997[J].Ecological Applications,1999,9(3):772-783.
    [26] 李金昌.生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999.
    [27] Cai Z C,Kang G D,Tsuruta H,et al.Estimate of CH4 emission from year-round flooded rice field during rice growing seasons in China[J].Pedosphere,2005,15(1):66-71.
    [28] 方精云,郭兆迪,朴世龙,等.1981—2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J].中国科学,2007,37(6):804-812.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700