用户名: 密码: 验证码:
城市融入有助于提升农民工环保行为吗?——基于CGSS数据的实证分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Does Urban Integration effect the Environmental Behaviors of Migrant Workers? Based on CGSS Data
  • 作者:聂伟 ; 梁婷婷
  • 英文作者:NIE Wei;LIANG Tingting;
  • 关键词:城市融入 ; 农民工环保行为 ; 城乡绿色发展 ; 绿色生活方式
  • 中文刊名:南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nanjing Tech University(Social Science Edition)
  • 机构:深圳大学城市治理研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-08-07
  • 出版单位:南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:教育部人文社会科学规划青年基金项目“就业质量对农民工入户意愿的影响研究”(16YJC840015);; 深圳市哲学社会科学2018年度重点课题“深圳营造共建共治共享社会治理格局走在全国最前列研究”(SZ2018A007)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:44-54+115
  • 页数:12
  • CN:32-1653/C
  • ISSN:1671-7287
  • 分类号:C912.6;D412.6;X24
摘要
农民工的环保行为直接关系新时代城乡绿色发展。本文利用CGSS 2013数据考察了城市融入对农民工环保行为的影响机制,结果发现:农民工的环保行为参与频率显著高于农民,但低于本地城市居民;私域环保行为参与显著高于公域环保行为。经济融入、社会融入、心理融入既能直接提升农民工总体环保行为,又会通过媒介接触、环境知识、环境污染认知等产生间接影响。因此,提升农民工环保行为,不仅需要加强环境知识宣传教育,减少媒介信息鸿沟,增强居民环境风险认知,更重要的是促进农民工全面融入城市。
        The environmental behavior of migrant workers is directly related to the green development of urban and rural areas in the new era. Based on CGSS 2013 data,this paper discuss the direct and indirect effect mechanism of urban integration affecting migrant workers' environment behaviors. The results showed as follows: The frequency of migrant workers' environmental behavior is between urban residents and farmer. Economic integration,social integration and psychological integration will directly improve the overall environmental behavior of migrant workers. Further more,the urban integration indirectly promotes the environmental behavior through the media use,environmental knowledge and environment cognition. Therefore,in order to improve the environmental behavior of migrant workers,the government need to strengthen the propaganda of environmental knowledge,reduce the media information gap and enhance residents' awareness of environmental risks. Moreover,it is more important to promote the urban integration of migrant workers.
引文
[1]ROMERO C B A,LAROCHE M,AURUP G M,et al.Ethnicity and acculturation of environmental attitudes and behaviors:Across-cultural study with Brazilians in Canada[J].Journal of Business Research,2018,82:300-309.
    [2]PFEFFER M J,STYCOS J M.Immigrant environmental behaviors in New York City[J].Social Science Quarterly,2002,83(1):64-81.
    [3]HUNTER L M A.Comparison of the environmental attitudes,concern,and behaviors of native-born and foreign-born U.S.resident[J].Population and Environment,2000,21(6):565-580.
    [4]SQUALLI J.Immigration and environmental emissions:A U.S.county-level analysis[J].Population and Environment,2009,30(6):247-260.
    [5]KERR G N,HUGHEY K F D,CULLEN R.Ethnic and immigrant differences in environmental values and behaviors[J].Society & Natural Resources,2016,29(11):1280-1295.
    [6]LIU Y,SEGEV S.Cultural orientations and environmental sustainability in households:A comparative analysis of Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites in the United States[J].International Journal of Consumer Studies,2017,41(6):587-596.
    [7]GRANT W.Environmental policy and social exclusion[J].Journal of European Public Policy,2001,8(1):82-100.
    [8]PARASKEVOPOULOS S,KORFIATIS K J,PANTIS J D.Social exclusion as a constraint for the development of environmentally friendly attitudes[J].Society & Natural Resources,2003,16(9):759-774.
    [9]INGLEHART R.Public support for environmental protection:Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies[J].Political Science and Politics,1995,28(1):57-72.
    [10]LEUNG C,RICE J.Comparison of Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitude and behavior[J].Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,2002,30(3):251-262.
    [11]何兴邦,周葵.城镇化对进城农民环保行为影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016(8):70-78.
    [12]王佃利,刘保军,楼苏萍.新生代农民工的城市融入——框架建构与调研分析[J].中国行政管理,2011(2):111-115.
    [13]喻少如.社会分层与环境意识[J].理论月刊,2002(8):30-32.
    [14]INGLEHART R.Modernization and postmodernization:Cultural,economic,and political change in 43 societies[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
    [15]何兴邦.社会互动与公众环保行为——基于 CGSS(2013) 的经验分析[J].软科学,2016(4):98-100.
    [16]卢少云.公民自愿主义、大众传媒与公共环保行为——基于中国 CGSS 2013数据的实证分析[J].公共行政评论,2017(5):69-85.
    [17]聂伟.公众环境关心的城乡差异与分解[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1):62-70.
    [18]REAGANS R,MCEVILY B.Network structure and knowledge transfer:The effects of cohesion and range[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2):240-267.
    [19]VICENTE-MOLINA M A,FERNANDEZ-SAINZ A,ZAGIRRE-OLAIZOLA J.Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour:Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,61:130-138.
    [20]POTHITOU M,HANNA R F,CHALVATZIS K J.Environmental knowledge,pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households:An empirical study[J].Applied Energy,2016,184:1217-1229.
    [21]王玉君,韩冬临.经济发展、环境污染与公众环保行为——基于中国CGSS 2013数据的多层分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2016(2):79-91.
    [22]曾凡斌.不同维度划分下的中间阶层与社会低层的媒介接触和使用比较[J].广州社会主义学院学报,2016(2):36-42.
    [23]金恒江,余来辉,张国良.媒介使用对个体环保行为的影响——基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS 2013)数据的实证研究[J].新闻大学,2017(2):46-55.
    [24]张萍,晋英杰.大众媒介对我国城乡居民环保行为的影响——基于2013年中国综合社会调查数据[J].中国人民大学学报,2016(4):122-129.
    [25]范叶超,洪大用.差别暴露、差别职业和差别体验:中国城乡居民环境关心差异的实证分析[J].社会,2015(3):141-167.
    [26]魏勇,范支柬,孙雷,等.中国公众环境意识的现状与影响因素[J].科普研究,2017(3):33-38.
    [27]WOLCH J,ZHANG J.Beach recreation,cultural diversity and attitudes toward nature[J].Journal of Leisure Research,2004,36(3):414-443.
    [28]GROB A.A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,1995,15(3):209-220.
    [29]彭远春.城市居民环境认知对环保行为的影响分析[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3):168-174.
    [30]聂伟.环境认知、环境责任感与城乡居民的低碳减排行为[J].科技管理研究,2016(15):252-256.
    [31]温忠麟,刘红云,侯杰泰.调节效应和中介效应分析[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2012:75.
    [32]李佐军,盛三化.城镇化进程中的环境保护:隐忧与应对[J].国家行政学院学报,2012(4):69-73.
    [33]祁秋寅,张捷,杨旸,等.自然遗产地游客环境态度与环境行为倾向研究——以九寨沟为例[J].旅游学刊,2009(11):41-46.
    [34]HINES J M,HUNGERFORD H R,TOMERA A N.Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior:A meta-analysis[J].The Journal of Environmental Education,1987,18(2):1-8.
    [35]卢春天,权小娟.媒介使用对政府信任的影响——基于CGSS 2010数据的实证研究[J].国际新闻界,2015(5):66-80.
    [36]BROWN N,DEEGAN C.The public disclosure of environmental performance information:A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory[J].Accounting & Business Research,1998,29(1):21-41.
    [37]李强.中国城市化进程中的“半融入”与“不融入”[J].河北学刊,2011(5):106-114.
    (1)题目为:① 汽车尾气对人体健康不会造成威胁;② 过量使用化肥农药会导致环境破坏;③ 含磷洗衣粉的使用不会造成水污染;④ 含氟冰箱的氟排放会成为破坏大气臭氧层的因素;⑤ 酸雨的产生与烧煤没有关系;⑥ 物种之间相互依存,一个物种的消失会产生连锁反应;⑦ 空气质量报告中,三级空气质量意味着比一级空气质量好;⑧ 单一品种的树林更容易导致病虫害;⑨ 水体污染报告中,V(5)类水质意味着要比Ⅰ(1)类水质好;⑩大气中二氧化碳成分的增加会成为气候变暖的因素。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700