摘要
船舶融资租赁是实现船舶融资的重要途径,也是对接金融机构与航运公司的桥梁。然而,由于相关法律的缺失,船舶融资租赁下的出租人往往面临诸多风险,不利于船舶融资租赁业的开展,并间接影响到航运业的发展。针对这一现实问题,以船舶优先权风险为切入点,在分析各种融资租赁模式和中国相关立法现状的基础上,通过选择合适的融资租赁模式、完善船舶融资租赁相关立法,进而提出降低、防范出租人风险的建议。
The ship's financial lease is an important way to raise ship finance and a bridge between financial institutions and shipping companies. However,due to the absence of relevant laws,the lessors under ship finance lease often face many risks,which is not conductive to the development of ship finance lease business and indirectly affects the development of shipping industry. Targeting this realistic problem,taking the risk of maritime lien as the entry point,and based on the analysis of various financial leasing models and the current situation of the relevant legislation in China,this paper puts forward some suggestions on the selection of the appropriate financial leasing models,improving the legislation relating to ship financial leasing,and reducing the risk of lessors.
引文
[1]RICHARDS E B.Maritime liens:an American view[J].Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly,LLP,1978:270.
[2]张炳生,王玲玲.租赁权的法律性质研究[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2016,29(2):106-110.
[3]陈华彬.物权与债权二元权利体系的形成以及物权和债权的区分[J].河北法学,2004(9):8-11.
[4]黄赤橙.动产作为“买卖不破租赁”客体的适格性分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,27(1):70-80.
[5]郭明瑞,王轶.合同法新论·分则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:102.
[6]周珺.论“买卖不破租赁”规则的适用对象[J].青海社会科学,2013(3):106-110.
[7]徐澜波.“买卖不破租赁”规则的立法技术分析[J].法学,2008(3):109-117.
[8]傅廷中.海商法论[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:46.
[9]刘澜飚.融资租赁理论与实务[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2016:38.
[10]郑雷.船舶融资租赁法律问题研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:251.
[11]杨健.我国船舶融资租赁法律问题研究[D].大连海事大学,2010:104-105.
[12]胡正良,孙思琪.我国《海商法》修改的基本问题与要点建议[J].国际法研究,2017(4):53-71.
(1)此处数据系以“船舶优先权”“融资租赁”为关键词于中国裁判文书网搜索而得,访问地址:http://wenshu.court.gov.cn/list/list/?sorttype=1&number=0.5762939340417732&guid=a15b439。
(1)此处“期权”是指融资租赁双方当事人约定的出租人可以在一定时间内以双方提前设定好的价格购买承租人一定数量或比例的股权,这种认购权实质上即为期权。