居民跨界行为的边界研究:以珠澳边界意义重构为例
|
摘要
研究探讨了边界的物理形态及其空间意义,并讨论由跨界行为催生的地方感与地方意象及其对边界空间意义的重构。以珠澳边界(拱北口岸)为案例地,本文主要采用追踪和访谈的研究方法,研究发现:跨越珠澳边界的行为(尤其是由珠海往澳门方向的跨界行为)以个人消费为主,主要包括购物、娱乐和餐饮等,而与之联结的消费地点也大同小异,但也存在不同时代和社会阶层因素对于跨界活动目的的影响,且流动性往往与特定的地方联结,使原有的固定行政边界及其所规定的空间管制逐渐被打破。出于满足生活的需求、社会互动的情感联系,抑或是出于追求地方价值的体验和情感表达,跨界主体成为塑造边界两边地理想象的重要因素,地理想象与现实生活空间的差异形成了想象的边界并间接地作用于珠澳边界空间意义的重构。
The research attempts to discuss the physical form of the boundary and its spatial function, argues the formation of space and time distribution of cross-border activity place related to the intention and practices of cross-border actors. Based on the particularity of border between Zhuhai and Macao, the cross-border flow of residents has promoted the social and cultural exchanges and integration of the two places from the bottom up. Base on the track of cross-border behavior and the interview from the Gongbei port,found that the practice of crossing the Zhuhai-Macau border is given priority to personal consumption, including shopping, entertainment and diet, etc.,and connecting with the consumer place is the same, but there are also differences from generation to generation and class for cross-border activities of the intended purpose and influence its activity location choice. Liquidity of crossover behavior connects with a specific place, making the space of the original fixed administrative boundaries set by control function is gradually being broken, for meeting the needs of life, emotional ties to social interaction, or the cause of the pursuit of the value of the local experience,subject to cross-border behavior's motivation and emotional expression is shaped the main clues of cross-border activities place's geographic imagination, the difference between the geographical imagination and the real life space forms the imaginary boundary, which indirectly forms the reconstruction of the spatial meaning of the Zhuhai-Macao boundary.
The research attempts to discuss the physical form of the boundary and its spatial function, argues the formation of space and time distribution of cross-border activity place related to the intention and practices of cross-border actors. Based on the particularity of border between Zhuhai and Macao, the cross-border flow of residents has promoted the social and cultural exchanges and integration of the two places from the bottom up. Base on the track of cross-border behavior and the interview from the Gongbei port,found that the practice of crossing the Zhuhai-Macau border is given priority to personal consumption, including shopping, entertainment and diet, etc.,and connecting with the consumer place is the same, but there are also differences from generation to generation and class for cross-border activities of the intended purpose and influence its activity location choice. Liquidity of crossover behavior connects with a specific place, making the space of the original fixed administrative boundaries set by control function is gradually being broken, for meeting the needs of life, emotional ties to social interaction, or the cause of the pursuit of the value of the local experience,subject to cross-border behavior's motivation and emotional expression is shaped the main clues of cross-border activities place's geographic imagination, the difference between the geographical imagination and the real life space forms the imaginary boundary, which indirectly forms the reconstruction of the spatial meaning of the Zhuhai-Macao boundary.
引文
[1] Prescott J R V. Political Frontiers and Boundaries. London:Allen and Unwin, 1987.
[2] Minghi J V. Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1963,53(3):407-428.
[3] Newman D.On borders and power:A theoretical framework.Journal of Borderlands Studies,2003,18(1):13-25.
[4] Barnett C.The cultural turn:Fashion or progress in human geography.Antipode,1998,30(4):379-394.
[5] Klein M. Old and new walls in Jerusalem. Political Geography, 2005, 24(1):53-76.
[6] Squire V. Desert"trash":Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography,2014,39(2):11-21.
[7] Dochartaigh N O. Conflict, territory and new technologies:Online interaction at a Belfast interface. Political Geography, 2007, 26(4):474-491.
[8] Doevenspeck M. Constructing the border from below:Narratives from the Congolese-Rwandan state boundary. Political Geography, 2007, 30(3):128-142.
[9]金晓哲,柴彦威.欧美消费者行为的地理学研究进展.第九次中国青年地理工作者学术研讨会论文摘要集,2003:9.
[10] Lamb V."Where is the border?"Villagers, environmental consultants and the'work'of the ThaiBurma border. Political Geography, 2014(40):1-12.
[11] Jones, Reece. Spaces of refusal:Rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 2012, 102(3):685-699.
[12] Dell Agnese E."WelcometoTijuana":PopularmusicontheUS-Mexicoborder.Geopolitics,2015,20(1):171-192.
[13] Lloyd K, Suchet Pearson S, Wright S, et al. Stories of crossings and connections from Bawaka,North East Arnhem Land, Australia. Social&Cultural Geography,2010,11(7):701-717.
[14] Hannam K,Sheller M, Urry J.Editorial:Mobilities,immobilities and moorings.Mobilities,2006,1(1):1-22.
[15]杨茜好,朱竑.西方人文地理学的"流动性"研究进展与启示.华南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2015(2):1-11.
[16] Cresswell T.Place:A short introduction.Wang Z H, Xu T L.Taibei:The Socio Publishing Co Ltd,2006.
[17] Cresswell T. On the move:Mobility in the modern western world. London:Routledge, 2006.
[18]顾朝林,宋国臣.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究.地理学报, 2001, 56(1):64-74.
[19]周素红,闫小培.基于居民通勤行为分析的城市空间解读——以广州市典型街区为案例.地理学报,2006,61(2):179-189.
[20]陈坤宏,王鸿楷.都市消费空间结构之形成及其意义:第三部分台北市六个商业区的经验研究.国立台湾大学建筑与城乡研究学报, 1996(8):1-34.
[21] Jackson P, Miller D, Rowlands M. Shopping, place and identity. London:Routledge, 2005.
[22] Weick K E, Sutcliffe K M, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of Sensemaking. Organization science,2005,16(4):409-421.
[23]柴彦威,沈洁.基于居民移动—活动行为的城市空间研究.人文地理,2006(5):108-112+54.
[24]安宁,钱俊希,陈晓亮,等.国际上的政治地理学研究进展与启示——对《Political Geography》杂志2005-2015年载文的分析.地理学报,2016,71(2):217.
[25]柴彦威,沈洁.基于活动分析法的人类空间行为研究.地理科学, 2008, 28(5):594-600.
[26] Jensen A.Mobility regimes and borderwork in the European Community. Mobilities,2013, 8(1):35-51.
[27] Relph E C. Place and Placelessness. London:SAGE, 1976.
[28]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例.地理研究,2016,35(8):1535-1546.
[29] Chapin F.S. Human activity patterns in the city. Queens Quarterly, 1974(29):463-469.
[30]王志弘.日常消费的地方连结与脱节:新北市三重区个案研究.建筑与城乡研究学报, 2012(19):1-25.
[31] Jakle J A,Brunn S D, Roseman C C.Human Spatial Behavior:A Social Geography.Waveland Press, 1985.
[32]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.社会建构主义视角下的边界——研究综述与启示.地理科学进展,2014,33(7):969-978.
[33] Cohen A P. Symbolic Construction of Community. London, New York:Routledge, 2013:44-115.
[34]胡正凡,林玉莲.环境心理学.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006:57.
[35] H?gerstrand T. What about people in regional science. Papers and proceeding of the Regional Science Association, 1970(24):7-21.
[2] Minghi J V. Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1963,53(3):407-428.
[3] Newman D.On borders and power:A theoretical framework.Journal of Borderlands Studies,2003,18(1):13-25.
[4] Barnett C.The cultural turn:Fashion or progress in human geography.Antipode,1998,30(4):379-394.
[5] Klein M. Old and new walls in Jerusalem. Political Geography, 2005, 24(1):53-76.
[6] Squire V. Desert"trash":Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography,2014,39(2):11-21.
[7] Dochartaigh N O. Conflict, territory and new technologies:Online interaction at a Belfast interface. Political Geography, 2007, 26(4):474-491.
[8] Doevenspeck M. Constructing the border from below:Narratives from the Congolese-Rwandan state boundary. Political Geography, 2007, 30(3):128-142.
[9]金晓哲,柴彦威.欧美消费者行为的地理学研究进展.第九次中国青年地理工作者学术研讨会论文摘要集,2003:9.
[10] Lamb V."Where is the border?"Villagers, environmental consultants and the'work'of the ThaiBurma border. Political Geography, 2014(40):1-12.
[11] Jones, Reece. Spaces of refusal:Rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 2012, 102(3):685-699.
[12] Dell Agnese E."WelcometoTijuana":PopularmusicontheUS-Mexicoborder.Geopolitics,2015,20(1):171-192.
[13] Lloyd K, Suchet Pearson S, Wright S, et al. Stories of crossings and connections from Bawaka,North East Arnhem Land, Australia. Social&Cultural Geography,2010,11(7):701-717.
[14] Hannam K,Sheller M, Urry J.Editorial:Mobilities,immobilities and moorings.Mobilities,2006,1(1):1-22.
[15]杨茜好,朱竑.西方人文地理学的"流动性"研究进展与启示.华南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2015(2):1-11.
[16] Cresswell T.Place:A short introduction.Wang Z H, Xu T L.Taibei:The Socio Publishing Co Ltd,2006.
[17] Cresswell T. On the move:Mobility in the modern western world. London:Routledge, 2006.
[18]顾朝林,宋国臣.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究.地理学报, 2001, 56(1):64-74.
[19]周素红,闫小培.基于居民通勤行为分析的城市空间解读——以广州市典型街区为案例.地理学报,2006,61(2):179-189.
[20]陈坤宏,王鸿楷.都市消费空间结构之形成及其意义:第三部分台北市六个商业区的经验研究.国立台湾大学建筑与城乡研究学报, 1996(8):1-34.
[21] Jackson P, Miller D, Rowlands M. Shopping, place and identity. London:Routledge, 2005.
[22] Weick K E, Sutcliffe K M, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of Sensemaking. Organization science,2005,16(4):409-421.
[23]柴彦威,沈洁.基于居民移动—活动行为的城市空间研究.人文地理,2006(5):108-112+54.
[24]安宁,钱俊希,陈晓亮,等.国际上的政治地理学研究进展与启示——对《Political Geography》杂志2005-2015年载文的分析.地理学报,2016,71(2):217.
[25]柴彦威,沈洁.基于活动分析法的人类空间行为研究.地理科学, 2008, 28(5):594-600.
[26] Jensen A.Mobility regimes and borderwork in the European Community. Mobilities,2013, 8(1):35-51.
[27] Relph E C. Place and Placelessness. London:SAGE, 1976.
[28]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例.地理研究,2016,35(8):1535-1546.
[29] Chapin F.S. Human activity patterns in the city. Queens Quarterly, 1974(29):463-469.
[30]王志弘.日常消费的地方连结与脱节:新北市三重区个案研究.建筑与城乡研究学报, 2012(19):1-25.
[31] Jakle J A,Brunn S D, Roseman C C.Human Spatial Behavior:A Social Geography.Waveland Press, 1985.
[32]唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.社会建构主义视角下的边界——研究综述与启示.地理科学进展,2014,33(7):969-978.
[33] Cohen A P. Symbolic Construction of Community. London, New York:Routledge, 2013:44-115.
[34]胡正凡,林玉莲.环境心理学.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006:57.
[35] H?gerstrand T. What about people in regional science. Papers and proceeding of the Regional Science Association, 1970(24):7-21.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |