用户名: 密码: 验证码:
关于敦化盆地下白垩统的讨论
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
前人根据敦化盆地的地层的地层,认为该盆地下白垩统为河流—湖泊相碎屑岩。通过对新钻的敦参1井岩屑录井资料的分析、对16条二维地震资料的层位标定与追踪,以及对敦化盆地早白垩世盆地演化阶段的分析,得到了以下主要结论:1)敦化盆地下白垩统可能有两种分布形态,在盆地的主体部位,以浅变质岩形态存在,而在其他部位则以正常沉积岩形态零星存在;2)敦化盆地白垩系的分布规模不大,夹持于一个北北东向的狭窄长槽内;3)敦化盆地早白垩世处于裂谷盆地发展的初始张裂阶段;4)敦化盆地下白垩统不宜作为勘探目的层。
Previous researchers interpreted the Lower Cretaceous in the Dunhua Basin as detrital rock of fluvial or lacustrine facies based on outcrop observations. In this paper, by analyzing drillcore cutttings in the DunCan1 core, seismic data from sixteen 2D seismic cross-sections,and basin evolutionary stages, we came to the following conclusions: 1) the Lower Cretaceous in the Dunhua Basin exists in two types: epimetamorphic rocks in the main part of the basin and sedimentary rocks in other parts of the basin. 2) the scale of this Early Cretaceous basin is limited in a NNE narrow trough. 3) In the Early Cretaceous period,this basin was at the early rifting stage. 4) the Lower Cretaceous can not be targeted as a potential source rock.
引文
[2]吉林省地质矿产局第六地质调查所.1978.吉林省敦化盆地黑石—官地煤田普查评价报告.
    [3]吉林省区域地质调查所.2005.1/25万《敦化市幅》区域地质调查报告.
    [1]吕修祥.2006.东北亚地区区域构造特征与典型含油气盆地油气成藏条件比较研究.
    吴根耀,梁兴,陈焕疆.2007.试论郯城—庐江断裂带的形成、演化及其性质.地质科学,42(1):160—175
    朱光,刘国生,宋传中,王道轩.2000.郯庐断裂带的脉动式伸展活动.高校地质学报,6(3):396—404
    朱光,王道轩,刘国生.2004.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应.地质科学,39(1):36—49
    Wu Gen-yao,Liang Xing&Chen Huan-jiang.2007.An approachto the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault Zone:its creation,evolution andcharacter.Chinese Journal of Geology,42(1):160—175
    Zhu Guang,Liu Guo-sheng,Song Chuang-zhong&Wang Dao-xu-an.2000.Pulsative extensional activities of the Tan-Lu FaultZone.Geological Journal of China Universities,6(3):396—404
    Zhu Guang,Wang Dao-xuan&Liu Guo-sheng.2004.Evolution ofthe Tan-Lu Fault Zone andits responses to plate movements inWest Pacific Basin.Chinese Journal of Geology,39(1):36—49

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700