两种农村居民点整治模式对村民生产影响的比较——基于211户村民调查
|
摘要
加强农村居民点整治对村民生产影响的研究,对科学评价农村居民点整治效益、完善相关政策具有重要意义。本文以山东省肥城市湖屯镇为例,采用问卷调查、层次分析与模糊综合评价等方法,从生产方式、生产便捷度、生产投入及经济收入等4方面,选择16个指标构建评价指标体系,评价和比较原地改造与异地搬迁2种农村居民点整治模式对村民生产的正面和负面影响,并据以提出对策建议,为农村居民点整治工作的后续开展提供参考。结果表明:原地改造模式的陶阳村正面影响11.86%,负面影响为0.92%,无影响为87.22%;异地搬迁模式的涧北村正面影响为10.89%,负面影响为19.95%,无影响为69.16%。2种农村居民点整治模式整体上对村民的生产基本没有产生较大的影响;2村村民所受的正面影响基本相同、相差不多,但涧北村村民受到的负面影响远大于陶阳村村民。基于此,本文提出通过发展二三产业、推进土地流转及培育新型农民等建议,以消除农村居民点整治给村民生产活动带来的负面影响。
It is of great significance to strengthen the study on the effect of rural settlement consolidation on villagers' production for evaluating the benefits of rural settlement consolidation scientifically and perfecting the relevant policies. In this study, Hutun Town, Feicheng City was chosen as the study area. This study used a combinatorial method, which is combined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on the basis of the questionaire survey, to evaluate and compare the positive and negative effect on villagers' production of the two kinds of the rural settlement consolidation mode which include in-situ reconstruction and remote relocation. In order to evaluate the effect on villagers' production, 16 index factors were selected from 4 aspects, including production modes, production convenience,production input and economy income, to establish the evaluation index system. The evaluation results showed that both of the two kinds of rural settlement consolidation mode had a little effect on villagers' production on the whole. The positive effect of Taoyang village which was in a mode of in-situ reconstruction was 11.86%, the negative effect was 0.92% and the left 87.22% was of no effect; while Jianbei village, in a mode of remote relocation, the positive effect was 10.89%, the negative effect was 19.95% and the left 69.16% was of no effect. Thus it could be seen that the positive effect suffered by villagers from the two villages were basically the same, while the negative effect suffered by Jianbei villagers were greater than that by Taoyang villagers. Based on the results, the study put forward some suggestions including to develop the two or three industry, to promote the land circulation, to cultivate new peasants and other suggestions for the followed work of the rural settlement consolidation, in order to eliminate the negative effect of rural settlement consolidation on villagers' production.
It is of great significance to strengthen the study on the effect of rural settlement consolidation on villagers' production for evaluating the benefits of rural settlement consolidation scientifically and perfecting the relevant policies. In this study, Hutun Town, Feicheng City was chosen as the study area. This study used a combinatorial method, which is combined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on the basis of the questionaire survey, to evaluate and compare the positive and negative effect on villagers' production of the two kinds of the rural settlement consolidation mode which include in-situ reconstruction and remote relocation. In order to evaluate the effect on villagers' production, 16 index factors were selected from 4 aspects, including production modes, production convenience,production input and economy income, to establish the evaluation index system. The evaluation results showed that both of the two kinds of rural settlement consolidation mode had a little effect on villagers' production on the whole. The positive effect of Taoyang village which was in a mode of in-situ reconstruction was 11.86%, the negative effect was 0.92% and the left 87.22% was of no effect; while Jianbei village, in a mode of remote relocation, the positive effect was 10.89%, the negative effect was 19.95% and the left 69.16% was of no effect. Thus it could be seen that the positive effect suffered by villagers from the two villages were basically the same, while the negative effect suffered by Jianbei villagers were greater than that by Taoyang villagers. Based on the results, the study put forward some suggestions including to develop the two or three industry, to promote the land circulation, to cultivate new peasants and other suggestions for the followed work of the rural settlement consolidation, in order to eliminate the negative effect of rural settlement consolidation on villagers' production.
引文
[1]张正峰,赵伟.农村居民点整理潜力内涵与评价指标体系[J].经济地理,2007,27(1):137-140
[2]吕亮卿.巴伐利亚州土地整理程序概述[M].德国:巴伐利亚州食品农林部,1992
[3]Sorensen A.Land Readjustment and Metropolitan Growth:An Examination of Suburban Land Development and Urban Sprawl in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area[J].Progress in Planning,2000(53):217-330
[4]Palmer E.Planned relocation of severely depopulated rural settlements:a case study from Japan[J].Journal of Rural Studies,1988,4(1):21-34
[5]孔雪松,刘艳芳,邹亚锋,等.基于农户意愿的农村居民点整理潜力测算与优化[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(8):296-301
[6]叶艳妹,吴次芳.我国农村居民点用地整理的潜力、运作模式与政策选择[J].农业经济问题,1998(10):54-57
[7]孔雪松,刘耀林,邓宣凯,等.村镇农村居民点用地适宜性评价与整治分区规划[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(18):215-222
[8]张正峰,吴沅箐,杨红.两类农村居民点整治模式下农户整治意愿影响因素比较研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(9):85-91
[9]曲衍波,姜广辉,张凤荣,等.基于农户意愿的农村居民点整治模式[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(23):232-242
[10]谷晓坤,卢新海,陈百明.大城市郊区农村居民点整理效果分析——基于典型案例的比较研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(10):1649-1657
[11]蔡进,邱道持,赵梓琰,等.新型农村社区人居环境变化研究——以重庆市忠县天子村社区为例[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(10):117-124
[12]信桂新,阎建忠,杨庆媛.新农村建设中农户的居住生活变化及其生计转型[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,34(2):122-130
[13]张凡,王帅.新型农村社区建设背景下的农民生产方式变革[J].通化师范学院学报:人文社科版,2014,35(5):111-114
[14]李希灿,王静,邵晓梅.模糊数学方法在中国土地资源评价中的应用与进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):409-416
[15]向欣,罗煜,程红胜,等.基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价的沼气工程技术筛选[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(18):205-212
[2]吕亮卿.巴伐利亚州土地整理程序概述[M].德国:巴伐利亚州食品农林部,1992
[3]Sorensen A.Land Readjustment and Metropolitan Growth:An Examination of Suburban Land Development and Urban Sprawl in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area[J].Progress in Planning,2000(53):217-330
[4]Palmer E.Planned relocation of severely depopulated rural settlements:a case study from Japan[J].Journal of Rural Studies,1988,4(1):21-34
[5]孔雪松,刘艳芳,邹亚锋,等.基于农户意愿的农村居民点整理潜力测算与优化[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(8):296-301
[6]叶艳妹,吴次芳.我国农村居民点用地整理的潜力、运作模式与政策选择[J].农业经济问题,1998(10):54-57
[7]孔雪松,刘耀林,邓宣凯,等.村镇农村居民点用地适宜性评价与整治分区规划[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(18):215-222
[8]张正峰,吴沅箐,杨红.两类农村居民点整治模式下农户整治意愿影响因素比较研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(9):85-91
[9]曲衍波,姜广辉,张凤荣,等.基于农户意愿的农村居民点整治模式[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(23):232-242
[10]谷晓坤,卢新海,陈百明.大城市郊区农村居民点整理效果分析——基于典型案例的比较研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(10):1649-1657
[11]蔡进,邱道持,赵梓琰,等.新型农村社区人居环境变化研究——以重庆市忠县天子村社区为例[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(10):117-124
[12]信桂新,阎建忠,杨庆媛.新农村建设中农户的居住生活变化及其生计转型[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,34(2):122-130
[13]张凡,王帅.新型农村社区建设背景下的农民生产方式变革[J].通化师范学院学报:人文社科版,2014,35(5):111-114
[14]李希灿,王静,邵晓梅.模糊数学方法在中国土地资源评价中的应用与进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):409-416
[15]向欣,罗煜,程红胜,等.基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价的沼气工程技术筛选[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(18):205-212
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |