活动重叠的复杂产品开发过程仿真分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Simulation analysis on the development process of complex products with activity overlapping 作者：张剑 ; 高维 ; 黎荣 ; 张义军 英文作者：ZHANG Jian;GAO Wei;LI Rong;ZHANG Yi-jun;School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University; 关键词：复杂产品开发 ; 活动重叠 ; 过程仿真 ; 设计结构矩阵 英文关键词：development process of complex products(PDP);;activity overlapping;;process simulation;;matrix of design structure 中文刊名：JXSJ 英文刊名：Journal of Machine Design 机构：西南交通大学机械工程学院; 出版日期：2019-01-20 出版单位：机械设计 年：2019 期：v.36;No.351 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51575461) 语种：中文; 页：JXSJ201901005 页数：7 CN：01 ISSN：12-1120/TH 分类号：27-33

摘要

为了更有效地对复杂产品开发过程的时间-成本-质量进行预测分析,提出了活动重叠的复杂产品开发过程仿真方法。将活动重叠分为顺序重叠和反馈重叠,提出了将信息输入矩阵和信息输出矩阵用于量化评价重叠情况;采用任务返工概率矩阵、返工影响矩阵、学习效应曲线及质量改进矩阵来描述设计过程的迭代特性;基于活动重叠和迭代提出了时间、成本、质量的计算方法,并改进了产品开发过程仿真算法。最后,通过一个实例证明了该模型的有效性和实用性。
        In order to effectively predict and analyze the time-cost-quality of the development process of complex products(PDP), a simulation method based on activity overlapping is proposed. Activity overlapping is divided into sequential overlapping and feedback overlapping. Both the information input matrix and information output matrix are proposed to measure the overlapping. The iterative features are defined by means of rework probability matrix, rework impact matrix, learning effect curve, and quality improvement matrix. The method of rework time-cost-quality calculation is proposed based on activity overlapping and irritation. Then, the simulation algorithm of PDP is improved. Finally, an example is given to prove the validity and practicability of the model.

引文

[1]檀润华,王庆禹.产品设计过程模型、策略与方法综述[J].机械设计, 2000, 17(11):1-4.
    [2] Wynn D C, Eckert C M. Perspectives on iteration in design and development[J]. Research in Engineering Design,2017,28(2):153-184.
    [3]张汉鹏,邱菀华.复杂产品开发的多因素风险分析模型及仿真[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2007, 13(7):1295-1299.
    [4]赵韩,武照云,韦艳丽,等.复杂产品开发过程仿真与预测研究[J].系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(22):7350-7354.
    [5]杨宝森.基于活动重叠的随机活动网络时间费用模型仿真研究[J].系统仿真学报, 2012, 24(3):684-687.
    [6]李洪波,徐哲.考虑活动随机重叠和资源冲突的复杂产品开发流程仿真建模[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34(7):1412-1418.
    [7]于静,徐哲,李洪波.带有活动重叠的资源受限项目调度问题建模与求解[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2015(5):1236-1245.
    [8] Yang Qing,Zhang Xiaofeng,Yao Tao. An overlapping-based process model for managing schedule and cost risk in product development[J]. Concurrent Engineering Research&Applications, 2012, 20(1):3-17.
    [9]杨宝森,杨楠,崔立.复杂产品研发项目进度费用风险的仿真研究(英文)[J].系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(11):2811-2815.
    [10] Lin J, Chai K H, Brombacher A C, et al. Optimal overlapping and functional interaction in product development[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3):1158-1169.
    [11]杨青,黄建美.基于活动重叠的DSM项目时间计算及排序优化[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(3):496-504.
    [12]白思俊,万小兵.基于设计结构矩阵的项目进度周期[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2008, 28(11):51-54.
    [13]辛君捷,江驹,徐海燕,等.基于设计结构矩阵的顺序与重叠度综合优化[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(11):2697-2703.
    [14] Reza Dehghan, Kamran Hazini, Janaka Ruwanpura. Optimization of overlapping activities in the design phase of construction projects[J]. Automation in Construction, 2015,59:81-95.
    [15] Cho S H, Eppinger S D. A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005, 52(3):316-328.
    [16] Browning T R, Eppinger S D. Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development[J]. Engineering Management IEEE Transactions on,2002, 49(4):428-442.
    [17]武照云.复杂产品开发过程规划理论与方法研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学, 2009.
    [18] Keefer D L, Verdini W A. Better estimation of PERT activity time parameters[M]. INFORMS, 1993.
    [19] Mckay M D, Beckman R J, Conover W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of Input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 2000, 21(1):239-245.
    [20] Cho S H, Eppinger S. Product development process modeling using advanced simulation[J]. Proc Asme Detc&Cie,2001.
    [21] Browning T R, Epping S D.Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development[J].Engineering Management IEEE Transactions on, 2002,49(4):428-442.