摘要
为了客观评价不同国家的木质林产品国际竞争力,构建了木质林产品国际竞争力综合评价指标体系,并以世界主要木质林产品生产和贸易国家为例,在采用主成分分析法、熵权法和灰色关联度分析法进行单项评价的基础上,运用模糊Borda的组合评价方法评价了主要国家木质林产品的国际竞争力,结果表明组合评价效果更佳.
Based on a comprehensive evaluation index system for international competitiveness of wood forest products, the paper evaluate the international competitiveness of wood forest products in different countries objectively. Taking the world's major wood forest product production and trade countries as examples, the main component analysis method, entropy weight method, and grey correlation analysis method are applied. On the basis of individual evaluation, fuzzy Borda's combined evaluation method was used to evaluate the international competitiveness of wood forest products in major countries. The results showed that the combined evaluation was better.
引文
[1]程宝栋,张英豪,赵桂梅.世界林产品贸易发展现状及趋势分析[J].林产工业,2011, 38(04):3-7.
[2]龙婷,潘焕学,马平,石小亮.基于复杂网络的国际木质林产品贸易动态分析[J].经济问题探索,2016(04):170-175+182.
[3]联合国粮食及农业组织.林产品年鉴2015[M].罗马:联合国粮食及农业组织,2017.
[4]范悦,程宝栋.中国主要木质林产品出口竞争力分析[J].中国林业经济,2011(01):5-8.
[5]庞新生,廖红蕾,宋维明.木质林产品国际竞争力综合评价方法比较分析[J].世界林业研究,2016, 29(06):7-11.
[6]顾晓燕.中国木质林产品出口贸易结构与林业经济增长一基于1981~2009年数据的分析[J].经济问题,2011(1):34-37.
[7]王玮.基于DEA的中国木质林产品国际竞争力分析[D].北京林业大学,2016.
[8]杨可玲,彭跃,朱冬辉,刘国武.我国区域经济国际竞争力评价研究[J].统计与决策,2015(04):68-71.
[9]苏为华,陈骥.模糊Borda法的缺陷分析及其改进思路[J].统计研究,2007(07):58-64.
[10]郭亚军,马赞福,张发明.组合评价方法的相对有效性分析及应用[J].中国管理科学,2009, 17(02):125-130.
[11] DIETER M,ENGLERT H.Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector:an empirical study with special emphasis on Germany[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 126(3):401-412.
[12] FAO.Global Forest Resources Assessment2015[R].Rome, 2015.
[13]张益,张俊容.基于兼容文和差异度的多属性评价方案优化方法[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(11):78-82.
[14]马亚龙,张伟,朱敏洁,丁月祥.评估方法的效度分析[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007(06):907-908+925.