无人驾驶汽车规范发展法律路径研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on the Legal Path of the Standardization Development of Driverless Cars 作者：吴英霞 英文作者：Wu Yingxia;Southwest University of Political Science and Law; 关键词：无人驾驶汽车 ; 人工智能 ; 学习能力 ; 渐进式 ; 无过错责任 英文关键词：driverless cars;;artificial intelligence;;learning ability;;progressive;;liability without fault 中文刊名：KJGL 英文刊名：Science and Technology Management Research 机构：西南政法大学; 出版日期：2019-01-20 出版单位：科技管理研究 年：2019 期：v.39;No.420 语种：中文; 页：KJGL201902006 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：44-1223/G3 分类号：44-49

摘要

无人驾驶汽车应当选择渐进式发展路径,其次通过许可、强制认证、乘客隐私权保护和运行报告等制度,加强无人驾驶汽车法律保障,最后,无人驾驶汽车造成交通事故,除侵权责任与产品责任之外,还存在各方均无过错的情形,对此,扩大无过错责任的适用范围,将汽车制造商和车主纳入无过错责任主体,方能保障无人驾驶汽车交通事故的追偿。
        Firstly,driverless cars should choose the path of gradual development. Secondly,through licensing,compulsory certification,passenger privacy protection and operation report system,strengthen the legal protection of driverless cars; Finally,in addition to tort liability and product liability,all parties are faultless in traffic accidents caused by driverless cars.In this regard,the scope of application of faultless liability should be expanded to include automobile manufacturers and owners as the subjects of faultless liability so as to ensure the recovery of traffic accidents caused by driverless cars.

引文

[1]阮朝辉.警惕人工智能异化、伪知识泛滥和全民娱乐对人性与文明的危害[J].科技管理研究,2016(8):262-266.
    [2]PEARL T H. Fast&furious:the misregulation of driverless cars[J].SSRN Electronic Journal,2017(1):19-72.
    [3]INGRASSIA P. How google is shaping the rules of the driverless road[EB/OL].(2016-04-26)[2018-03-29]. http://www. reuters.com/investigates/special-report/autors-driverless/.
    [4]贾斯卡里安.逐步升级驾驶自动化[J].科技创业,2012(4):76-77.
    [5]VLADECK D C. Machines without principals:liability rules and artificial intelligence[J]. Washington Law Review. 2014(1):117-150.
    [6]齐昆鹏.“‘2017’人工智能:技术、伦理与法律’研讨会在京召开”[J].科学与社会,2017(2):124-130.
    [7]甘绍平.机器人怎么可能拥有权利[J].伦理性研究,2017(3):126-130.
    [8]BOSTROM N. The superintelligent will:motivation and instrumental rationality in advanced artificial agents[J]. Minds&Machines. 2012,22(2):71-84.
    [9]陈燕申,陈思凯.美国政府《联邦自动驾驶汽车政策》解读与探讨[J].综合运输,2017(39):37-43.
    [10]郑戈.人工智能与法律的未来[J].探索与争鸣,2017(10):78-84.
    [11]肖马克,赵新华.无人驾驶汽车:谁来承担责任?[EB/OL].(2017-09-18)[2018-03-29]. http://lawyeredu. pkulaw. cn/index.php? m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=10&id=235.
    [12]司晓,曹建峰.论人工智能的民事责任:以自动驾驶汽车和智能机器人为切入点[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017(5):166-173.
    [13]吴汉东.人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017(5):128-136.
    [14]李一染,周洁,詹锡兰.无人驾驶转向系统自抗扰控制研究[J].上海师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010(2):156-160.
    [15]王泽鉴.侵权行为法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:16.
    [16]杨立新.侵权责任形态研究[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2004(1):1-13.
    [17]姜影.法国物件致损责任一般条款述评[J].经济研究导刊,2014(15):283-285.
    [18]贾婉婷.无过错责任规则依据之探讨[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006.
    [19]杨琳.无人驾驶汽车何时“满街跑”[N].北京晨报,2017-06-16(B7).
    [20]HOFFMANN R. Zuckerberg:telepathy is the future of facebook[EB/OL].(2015-07-01)[2018-3-29]. http://www. wired. co. uk/article/facebook-zuckerberg-qa-the-future.