2018年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2019年展望——土地管理领域分报告
|
摘要
研究目的:归纳分析2018年国内外土地管理领域的研究进展,展望研究趋势。研究方法:文献统计法。研究结果:2018年国内外在土地管理体制改革、土地制度改革与政策创新、土地立法修法创新、女性土地权益保障等方面具有共同的研究焦点。国内研究继续关注耕地保护,国外研究则较多关注城市土地利用与管理。研究结论:2018年,随着土地管理体制变革、农村土地制度改革、农村新产业新业态用地等新问题不断出现,土地管理领域研究在土地空间资源管理、土地管理体制、土地管理法律修订等方面有所发展。2019年将重点关注自然资源管理体制下土地资源管理的理论与方法创新、农村土地政策创新、空间规划管理与国土空间管制、数量—质量—生态"三位一体"耕地保护等问题。
The purpose of this study is to analyze the research progress of land management in China and abroad in 2018,as well as to present the future trend of research. The method employed in this paper is literature review. The results show that land administrative reform, land institutional reform and policy innovation, land legislation innovation as well as female land rights protection were discussed extensively all over the world in 2018. In addition, the international studies paid more attention on urban land use and management, while the domestic studies mainly focused on farmland protection. In conclusion, with the emergence of new problems such as land administrative system reform, rural land institutional reform, and the new land use types for new industries in the rural areas, the research in the field of land management in 2018 made the progress on the land spatial resources management, land administrative system research,land law amendment, etc. In 2019, more attentions could be given to the following topics: theory and method innovation of land resource management under the natural resource management system, rural land policy innovation, spatial planning management and land space control, and quantity-quality-ecology "three-in-one" cultivated land protection, etc.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the research progress of land management in China and abroad in 2018,as well as to present the future trend of research. The method employed in this paper is literature review. The results show that land administrative reform, land institutional reform and policy innovation, land legislation innovation as well as female land rights protection were discussed extensively all over the world in 2018. In addition, the international studies paid more attention on urban land use and management, while the domestic studies mainly focused on farmland protection. In conclusion, with the emergence of new problems such as land administrative system reform, rural land institutional reform, and the new land use types for new industries in the rural areas, the research in the field of land management in 2018 made the progress on the land spatial resources management, land administrative system research,land law amendment, etc. In 2019, more attentions could be given to the following topics: theory and method innovation of land resource management under the natural resource management system, rural land policy innovation, spatial planning management and land space control, and quantity-quality-ecology "three-in-one" cultivated land protection, etc.
引文
[1]郭仁忠,罗平,罗婷文.土地管理三维思维与土地空间资源认知[J].地理研究,2018,37(4):649-658.
[2]董祚继.从机构改革看国土空间治理能力的提升[J].中国土地,2018(11):4-9.
[3]严金明,王晓莉,夏方舟.重塑自然资源管理新格局:目标定位、价值导向与战略选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):1-7.
[4]黄贤金,杨红,罗明.农村土地制度的改革创新模式和绩效[J].中国土地,2018(5):13-15.
[5]严金明,陈昊,夏方舟.深化农村“三块地”改革:问题、要义和取向[J].改革,2018(5):48-55.
[6]朱道林,李瑶瑶.农村土地制度改革的经济学考察[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):1-5.
[7]顾龙友.对农村宅基地制度改革试点实践的思考(下)[J].中国土地,2018(1):36-38.
[8]杨丽霞,朱从谋,苑韶峰,等.基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析--以浙江省义乌市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):35-41.
[9]钟荣桂,吕萍.江西余江宅基地制度改革试点经验与启示[J].经济体制改革,2018(2):13-18.
[10]刘守英,熊雪锋.经济结构变革、村庄转型与宅基地制度变迁--四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例研究[J].中国农村经济,2018(6):2-20.
[11]顾龙友.苏皖赣15市(县、区)农村宅基地管理创新调查与思考[J].中国土地,2018(9):46-49.
[12]刘锐.乡村振兴战略框架下的宅基地制度改革[J].理论与改革,2018(3):72-80.
[13]晓叶.农村宅基地制度改革的特点与方向[J].中国土地,2018(5):1.
[14]舒帮荣,李永乐,陈利洪,等.农村集体经营性建设用地流转模式再审视:基于产权让渡与市场化的视角[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):22-28.
[15]高欣,张安录.农村集体建设用地入市对农户收入的影响--基于广东省佛山市南海区村级层面的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):44-50.
[16]谢保鹏,朱道林,陈英.土地增值收益分配对比研究:征收与集体经营性建设用地入市[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(3):334-339.
[17]曲承乐,任大鹏.论集体经营性建设用地入市对农村发展的影响[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):36-41.
[18]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):1-8.
[19]陈明.农村集体经营性建设用地入市改革的评估与展望--兼论农村“三块地”改革的市场化方向[J].农业经济问题,2018(4):1-15.
[20]陈美球,廖彩荣,冯广京,等.农村集体经济组织成员权的实现研究--基于“土地征收视角下农村集体经济组织成员权实现研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):58-64.
[21]李子乐,胡中华.论农地征收补偿标准之争的契约解[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(3):168-177.
[22]吕图,刘向南,刘鹏.程序公正与征地补偿:基于程序性权利保障的影响分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(9):1742-1751.
[23]赖文浩.华南地区农村新产业新业态用地情况调查[J].中国土地,2018(2):45-48.
[24]陈美球,蒋仁开,朱美英,等.乡村振兴背景下农村产业用地政策选择--基于“乡村振兴与农村产业用地政策创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):90-96.
[25]黄薇.如何加强农村新产业新业态用地保障[J].中国土地,2018(7):52-54.
[26]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[27]宋志红.三权分置下农地流转权利体系重构研究[J].中国法学,2018(4):282-302.
[28]高飞.土地承包权与土地经营权分设的法律反思及立法回应--兼评《农村土地承包法修正案(草案)》[J].法商研究,2018,35(3):3-14.
[29]席志国.民法典编纂中集体土地权利体系新路径[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(1):109-113.
[30]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):46-57.
[31]刘国栋.论宅基地三权分置政策中农户资格权的法律表达[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019(1):1-9.
[32]宋志红.宅基地“三权分置”的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018,36(4):142-153.
[33]席志国.民法典编纂视域中宅基地“三权分置”探究[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):45-50.
[34]贺雪峰.如何理解征地冲突--兼论《土地管理法》的修改[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):111-117.
[35]桂华.论土地使用权转让的《宪法》秩序--《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)评析[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):124-130.
[36]印子.论宅基地使用权实现的法律制度模式--兼评《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):131-140.
[37]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究--17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):98-108.
[38]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗?--基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(5):92-102.
[39]罗明忠,黄晓彤.农地确权会提高农地流转契约的稳定性吗?[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(4):617-625.
[40]朱文清,张莉琴.集体林地确权到户对林地流转的政策效果分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1407-1417.
[41]吴郁玲,石汇,王梅,等.农村异质性资源禀赋、宅基地使用权确权与农户宅基地流转:理论与来自湖北省的经验[J].中国农村经济,2018(5):52-67.
[42]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性?--基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):118-127.
[43]蔡洁,夏显力.农地流转真的能够减贫吗?[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(7):1-6.
[44]王亦白.不动产登记审查的模式选择和标准确立[J].中国土地科学,2018(11):10-15.
[45]漆信贤,张志宏,黄贤金.面向新时代的耕地保护矛盾与创新应对[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):9-15.
[46]祖健,郝晋珉,陈丽,等.耕地数量、质量、生态三位一体保护内涵及路径探析[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(7):84-95.
[47]刘恬,胡伟艳,魏安奇,等.基于多尺度的基本农田空间区位选择--以武汉城市圈为例[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1365-1374.
[48]曾吉彬,邵景安,谢德体.基于遥感影像的重庆高标准基本农田建设难度与时序分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(23):267-278.
[49]陈美球,刘桃菊.新时期提升我国耕地保护实效的思考[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(1):1-8.
[50]陈美球,洪土林,刘桃菊,等.落实耕地占补产能平衡的思考[J].中州学刊,2018(1):39-44.
[51]韩璐,孟鹏,蒋仁开,等.新时代耕地占补平衡的逻辑根源、模式探索与管理创新--基于“新时代耕地占补平衡方式改进与管理创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):90-96.
[52]JUNGHO P,MANHEE H.Modern state formation and land management in South Korea:1945-1960[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:662-671.
[53]COLLINS A M,GRANT J A,ACKAH-BAIDOO P.The glocal dynamics of land reform in natural resource sectors:insights from Tanzania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,2:889-896.
[54]ANNA K,AGNIESZKA D,RYSZARD.The Polish land administration system supporting good governance[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:547-555.
[55]MORERI K,FAIRBAIRN D,JAMES P.Issues in developing a fit for purpose system for incorporating VGI in land administration in Botswana[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:402-411.
[56]CHAU K W,CHOY L H T,WEBSTER C J.Institutional innovations in land development and planning in the 20th and21st centuries[J].Habitat International,2018,75:90-95.
[57]FITZ D.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:255-267.
[58]RAHIMZADEH A.Political ecology of land reforms in Kinnaur:implications and a historical overview[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:570-579.
[59]ARITI A T,VLIET J V,VERBURG P H.Farmers’participation in the development of land use policies for the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,71:129-137.
[60]TURA H A.Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:247-255.
[61]SERGE G N,EKPODESSI H N.Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law 2013-01[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:61-69.
[62]RODR GUEZ-RODR GUEZ D,MART NEZ-VEGA J.Effect of legal protection and management of protected areas at preventing land development:a Spanish case study[J].Regional Environmental Change,2018,42:1-12.
[63]WILY L A.Risks to the sanctity of community lands in Kenya.A critical assessment of new legislation with reference to forestlands[J].Land Use Policy,2018,75:661-672.
[64]KRABBEN E V D,LENFERINK S.The introduction of urban land readjustment legislation as an institutional innovation in Dutch land policy[J].Habitat International,2018,75:114-121.
[65]DILLON B,VOENA A.Widows’land rights and agricultural investment[J].Journal of Development Economics,2018(135):449-460.
[66]ABBOTT P,MUGISHA R,SAPSFORD R.Women,land and empowerment in Rwanda[J].Journal of International Development,2018,30(6):1006-1022.
[67]AMBE J N,LIORA B,ERICK O A,et al.Institutional,economic and socio-cultural factors accounting for genderbased inequalities in land title procurement in Cameroon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:116-125.
[68]LEGESSE B A,JEFFERSON-MOORE K,THOMAS T.Impacts of land tenure and property rights on reforestation intervention in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:494-499.
[69]NKOMOKI W,BAVOROVA M,BANOUT J.Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and food security threats:Effects of land tenure in Zambia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:532-538.
[70]ALICE C,YANN L,HAROLD L.What drives land take and urban land expansion?A systematic review[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:339-349.
[71]ANDERS W,QIAN Z.Keeping agriculture alive next to the city-The functions of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg,Sweden[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:447-459.
[72]WUBNEH M.Policies and praxis of land acquisition,use and development in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,73:170-183.
[73]JYOTI R.Fundamental Functionings of Landowners Understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[74]EVANCE M,RONNIE D.Urban land contestations,challenges and planning strategies in Malawi’s main urban centres[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:1-8.
[75]LUCY E,KATHERINE A S.Re-thinking sustainable land management planning:Understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:684-694.
[2]董祚继.从机构改革看国土空间治理能力的提升[J].中国土地,2018(11):4-9.
[3]严金明,王晓莉,夏方舟.重塑自然资源管理新格局:目标定位、价值导向与战略选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):1-7.
[4]黄贤金,杨红,罗明.农村土地制度的改革创新模式和绩效[J].中国土地,2018(5):13-15.
[5]严金明,陈昊,夏方舟.深化农村“三块地”改革:问题、要义和取向[J].改革,2018(5):48-55.
[6]朱道林,李瑶瑶.农村土地制度改革的经济学考察[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):1-5.
[7]顾龙友.对农村宅基地制度改革试点实践的思考(下)[J].中国土地,2018(1):36-38.
[8]杨丽霞,朱从谋,苑韶峰,等.基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析--以浙江省义乌市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):35-41.
[9]钟荣桂,吕萍.江西余江宅基地制度改革试点经验与启示[J].经济体制改革,2018(2):13-18.
[10]刘守英,熊雪锋.经济结构变革、村庄转型与宅基地制度变迁--四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例研究[J].中国农村经济,2018(6):2-20.
[11]顾龙友.苏皖赣15市(县、区)农村宅基地管理创新调查与思考[J].中国土地,2018(9):46-49.
[12]刘锐.乡村振兴战略框架下的宅基地制度改革[J].理论与改革,2018(3):72-80.
[13]晓叶.农村宅基地制度改革的特点与方向[J].中国土地,2018(5):1.
[14]舒帮荣,李永乐,陈利洪,等.农村集体经营性建设用地流转模式再审视:基于产权让渡与市场化的视角[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):22-28.
[15]高欣,张安录.农村集体建设用地入市对农户收入的影响--基于广东省佛山市南海区村级层面的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):44-50.
[16]谢保鹏,朱道林,陈英.土地增值收益分配对比研究:征收与集体经营性建设用地入市[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(3):334-339.
[17]曲承乐,任大鹏.论集体经营性建设用地入市对农村发展的影响[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):36-41.
[18]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):1-8.
[19]陈明.农村集体经营性建设用地入市改革的评估与展望--兼论农村“三块地”改革的市场化方向[J].农业经济问题,2018(4):1-15.
[20]陈美球,廖彩荣,冯广京,等.农村集体经济组织成员权的实现研究--基于“土地征收视角下农村集体经济组织成员权实现研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):58-64.
[21]李子乐,胡中华.论农地征收补偿标准之争的契约解[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(3):168-177.
[22]吕图,刘向南,刘鹏.程序公正与征地补偿:基于程序性权利保障的影响分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(9):1742-1751.
[23]赖文浩.华南地区农村新产业新业态用地情况调查[J].中国土地,2018(2):45-48.
[24]陈美球,蒋仁开,朱美英,等.乡村振兴背景下农村产业用地政策选择--基于“乡村振兴与农村产业用地政策创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):90-96.
[25]黄薇.如何加强农村新产业新业态用地保障[J].中国土地,2018(7):52-54.
[26]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[27]宋志红.三权分置下农地流转权利体系重构研究[J].中国法学,2018(4):282-302.
[28]高飞.土地承包权与土地经营权分设的法律反思及立法回应--兼评《农村土地承包法修正案(草案)》[J].法商研究,2018,35(3):3-14.
[29]席志国.民法典编纂中集体土地权利体系新路径[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(1):109-113.
[30]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):46-57.
[31]刘国栋.论宅基地三权分置政策中农户资格权的法律表达[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2019(1):1-9.
[32]宋志红.宅基地“三权分置”的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018,36(4):142-153.
[33]席志国.民法典编纂视域中宅基地“三权分置”探究[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):45-50.
[34]贺雪峰.如何理解征地冲突--兼论《土地管理法》的修改[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):111-117.
[35]桂华.论土地使用权转让的《宪法》秩序--《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)评析[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):124-130.
[36]印子.论宅基地使用权实现的法律制度模式--兼评《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):131-140.
[37]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究--17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):98-108.
[38]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗?--基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(5):92-102.
[39]罗明忠,黄晓彤.农地确权会提高农地流转契约的稳定性吗?[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(4):617-625.
[40]朱文清,张莉琴.集体林地确权到户对林地流转的政策效果分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1407-1417.
[41]吴郁玲,石汇,王梅,等.农村异质性资源禀赋、宅基地使用权确权与农户宅基地流转:理论与来自湖北省的经验[J].中国农村经济,2018(5):52-67.
[42]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性?--基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):118-127.
[43]蔡洁,夏显力.农地流转真的能够减贫吗?[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(7):1-6.
[44]王亦白.不动产登记审查的模式选择和标准确立[J].中国土地科学,2018(11):10-15.
[45]漆信贤,张志宏,黄贤金.面向新时代的耕地保护矛盾与创新应对[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):9-15.
[46]祖健,郝晋珉,陈丽,等.耕地数量、质量、生态三位一体保护内涵及路径探析[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(7):84-95.
[47]刘恬,胡伟艳,魏安奇,等.基于多尺度的基本农田空间区位选择--以武汉城市圈为例[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1365-1374.
[48]曾吉彬,邵景安,谢德体.基于遥感影像的重庆高标准基本农田建设难度与时序分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(23):267-278.
[49]陈美球,刘桃菊.新时期提升我国耕地保护实效的思考[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(1):1-8.
[50]陈美球,洪土林,刘桃菊,等.落实耕地占补产能平衡的思考[J].中州学刊,2018(1):39-44.
[51]韩璐,孟鹏,蒋仁开,等.新时代耕地占补平衡的逻辑根源、模式探索与管理创新--基于“新时代耕地占补平衡方式改进与管理创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):90-96.
[52]JUNGHO P,MANHEE H.Modern state formation and land management in South Korea:1945-1960[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:662-671.
[53]COLLINS A M,GRANT J A,ACKAH-BAIDOO P.The glocal dynamics of land reform in natural resource sectors:insights from Tanzania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,2:889-896.
[54]ANNA K,AGNIESZKA D,RYSZARD.The Polish land administration system supporting good governance[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:547-555.
[55]MORERI K,FAIRBAIRN D,JAMES P.Issues in developing a fit for purpose system for incorporating VGI in land administration in Botswana[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:402-411.
[56]CHAU K W,CHOY L H T,WEBSTER C J.Institutional innovations in land development and planning in the 20th and21st centuries[J].Habitat International,2018,75:90-95.
[57]FITZ D.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:255-267.
[58]RAHIMZADEH A.Political ecology of land reforms in Kinnaur:implications and a historical overview[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:570-579.
[59]ARITI A T,VLIET J V,VERBURG P H.Farmers’participation in the development of land use policies for the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,71:129-137.
[60]TURA H A.Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:247-255.
[61]SERGE G N,EKPODESSI H N.Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law 2013-01[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:61-69.
[62]RODR GUEZ-RODR GUEZ D,MART NEZ-VEGA J.Effect of legal protection and management of protected areas at preventing land development:a Spanish case study[J].Regional Environmental Change,2018,42:1-12.
[63]WILY L A.Risks to the sanctity of community lands in Kenya.A critical assessment of new legislation with reference to forestlands[J].Land Use Policy,2018,75:661-672.
[64]KRABBEN E V D,LENFERINK S.The introduction of urban land readjustment legislation as an institutional innovation in Dutch land policy[J].Habitat International,2018,75:114-121.
[65]DILLON B,VOENA A.Widows’land rights and agricultural investment[J].Journal of Development Economics,2018(135):449-460.
[66]ABBOTT P,MUGISHA R,SAPSFORD R.Women,land and empowerment in Rwanda[J].Journal of International Development,2018,30(6):1006-1022.
[67]AMBE J N,LIORA B,ERICK O A,et al.Institutional,economic and socio-cultural factors accounting for genderbased inequalities in land title procurement in Cameroon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:116-125.
[68]LEGESSE B A,JEFFERSON-MOORE K,THOMAS T.Impacts of land tenure and property rights on reforestation intervention in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:494-499.
[69]NKOMOKI W,BAVOROVA M,BANOUT J.Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and food security threats:Effects of land tenure in Zambia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:532-538.
[70]ALICE C,YANN L,HAROLD L.What drives land take and urban land expansion?A systematic review[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:339-349.
[71]ANDERS W,QIAN Z.Keeping agriculture alive next to the city-The functions of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg,Sweden[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:447-459.
[72]WUBNEH M.Policies and praxis of land acquisition,use and development in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,73:170-183.
[73]JYOTI R.Fundamental Functionings of Landowners Understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[74]EVANCE M,RONNIE D.Urban land contestations,challenges and planning strategies in Malawi’s main urban centres[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:1-8.
[75]LUCY E,KATHERINE A S.Re-thinking sustainable land management planning:Understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:684-694.