我国集体劳动争议的特征与劳动者权益保障的实证研究——基于北京市西城区106件集体劳动争议的调研

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Empirical Research on Characteristics of Collective Labor Dispute and Laborers' Rights Protection——Based on Survey of 106 Collective Labor Disputes in Xicheng District in Beijing 作者：常成 英文作者：Chang Cheng;Capital University of Economics and Business School of Labor and Economics; 关键词：权利型集体劳动争议 ; 集体劳动争议仲裁的适用性 ; 劳动者权益保障 英文关键词：rights type of dispute in collective labor relations;;applicability of collective labor dispute arbitration;;protection on workers' rights and interests 中文刊名：GFGB 英文刊名：Shandong Trade Unions' Tribune 机构：首都经济贸易大学劳动经济学院; 出版日期：2019-01-20 出版单位：山东工会论坛 年：2019 期：v.25;No.154 基金：国家社会科学重大课题基金“集体劳动争议预防和处理机制的系统化建构”(项目编号:14ZDA066)的阶段性研究成果;; 2017年北京市实培计划深化项目基金资助 语种：中文; 页：GFGB201901012 页数：6 CN：01 ISSN：37-1499/D 分类号：78-83

摘要

集体劳动关系在企业中的状况目前还未得到应有的关注和分析。我国企业工会的弱势和功能的内部冲突造成了企业集体劳动争议的特殊表现形式和处理方式,在企业的集体劳动关系中劳动者的权益被普遍侵害。北京市西城区劳动人事仲裁院106起集体劳动争议案件与处理情况表明,集体劳动关系中劳资双方矛盾的成因主要有两方面:一是在当前经济新常态背景下,经济下行压力加大,一些企业实施减员增效等改革措施过程中造成的劳动权益受到侵害;二是企业在正常经营的情况下,为追求利润最大化,采用一些非法手段逃避法律责任造成的劳资纠纷。在实践中,我国现行的集体争议处理制度保障既有优势也有不足,另外,在处理集体争议制度中调解机制的适用性也是值得质疑的,软化法律标准在司法中容易造成对劳动者合法权益的二次侵害。
        Collective labor relations in enterprises ought to be paid fuller attention and more analysis. The internal conflict of weaknesses and functioning of enterprise trade unions engender the particular type of collective labour disputes as well as the dispute resolution, that is the prevalence of infringement on workers' rights and interests in a ''collective form'' of labour disputes. The 106 arbitrated cases of collective labour dispute in the Labour and Personnal Arbitrative Bureau of Xicheng District of Beijing are set up to analyse. These cases indicate that two major factors contribute to the conflicts between the labour and the capital at enterprises, namely the economic behaviors that the labour rights are impaired in a transformation process in which the enterprise decreases labour costs in an economic depressions, and the management misbehaviors that the enterprise deprives labour rights, in which unlawful methods are adopted to get rid of legal duties and to pursue the maximized profits. In terms of the judicial aspect, both cons and pros exist in the current institution of labour dispute resolution. Furthermore, the applicability of mediation institution in addressing the collective labour dispute deserves to be questioned, because the softened law becomes a major reason harming the workers legal rights and interests.

引文

[1]谢鹏鑫.近年来国内劳动争议调解的研究综述与展望[J].中国人力资源开发,2015(1).
    [2]潘泰萍.集体劳动争议调解制度构建中存在的问题及对策建议[J].图书情报导刊,2011(2).
    [3]涂伟.我国集体劳动争议处理的法律规制及其存在问题[J].中国人力资源开发,2013(21).
    [4]杨芳霞.论集体劳动争议处理的法律机制[J].法制与社会,2009(9).
    [5]肖竹.对劳动争议仲裁的反思与未来改革之基本思路[J].中国人力资源开发, 2016(2).
    [6]杨欣,姜颖.我国重大集体劳动争议现状及处理机制分析——以G省的调研数据为据[J].北京行政学院学报,2013(4).
    [7]王仁富.新常态下非公企业劳动关系协调的思考[J].山东工会论坛,2017(1).
    [8]程延园,谢鹏鑫,冯娇娇,王甫希,徐晓世.劳动争议调解会损害劳动者权益吗?——劳动者的让步程度及其影响因素研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2016(9).
    [9]庄文嘉,岳经纶.从法庭走向街头——“大调解”何以将工人维权行动挤出制度化渠道[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1).
    [10]余琴,庄文嘉.改革开放40年来的劳动立法、地方调解与争议处置——基于劳动争议胜诉率的实证分析[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3).