新媒体动员对大学生参与集体行动的影响:中介和调节效应检验
|
摘要
目的:研究大学生群体相对剥夺感、新媒体动员、群体愤怒、群体效能和集体行动的关系,为大学生理性规范行为、提高媒介心理素养提供理论依据。方法:采用群体相对剥夺感问卷、新媒体动员问卷、群体愤怒问卷、群体效能问卷和集体行动问卷,对分层抽取的4省8所高校的711名大学生进行调查,采用SPSS 17. 0和PROCESS中的模型7进行分析。结果:大学生新媒体使用与群体相对剥夺感、群体愤怒、群体效能、集体行动呈正相关(r值分别为0. 53、0. 40、0. 33和0. 16,P值均<0. 01)。群体相对剥夺感和新媒体动员对于集体行动的主效应及交互作用显著(R2=0. 001,F=8. 86,P <0. 01)。群体愤怒和群体效能显著预测集体行动(B=5. 26,95%CI=4. 01-6. 53; B=4. 49,95%CI=3. 28-5. 71),群体愤怒和群体效能的中介效应成立。新媒体动员对群体愤怒和群体效能具有显著调节作用(B=0. 26,95%CI=0. 18-0. 34)和(B=0. 25,95%CI=0. 17-0. 34)。在控制群体愤怒和群体效能后,新媒体动员对集体行动无显著关联,新媒体动员的中介调节效应成立。结论:新媒体动员对群体相对剥夺感与集体行动之间的关系具有增强的调节效应,这种调节效应以群体愤怒和群体效能为中介变量。
The paper is intended to study the relationship between college students' relative deprivation,new media mobilization,group anger,group efficacy and collective action,and to provide theoretical basis for college students to regulate their rational behaviors and improve their media psychological literacy.711 college students from 8 universities in four provinces were investigated via a group relative deprivation questionnaire,including a new media mobilization questionnaire,a group anger questionnaire,a group efficacy questionnaire and a collective action questionnaire.SPSS 17.0 and PROCESS Model 7 were used for data analysis.Results indicate that the use of new media is positively correlated with group relative deprivation,group anger,group efficacy and collective action.The main effect and interaction of group relative deprivation and new media mobilization on collective action are significant.Group anger and group efficacy significantly can predicted collective action,and the mediating effect of group anger and group efficacy is established.New media mobilization significantly moderates group anger and group efficacy.After controlling group anger and group efficacy,new media mobilization has no significant correlation with collective action,and the mediating effect of new media mobilization is established.A conclusion may be safely drawn that new media mobilization has an enhanced moderating effect on the relationship between group relative deprivation and collective action.The moderating effect is mediated by group anger and group efficacy.
The paper is intended to study the relationship between college students' relative deprivation,new media mobilization,group anger,group efficacy and collective action,and to provide theoretical basis for college students to regulate their rational behaviors and improve their media psychological literacy.711 college students from 8 universities in four provinces were investigated via a group relative deprivation questionnaire,including a new media mobilization questionnaire,a group anger questionnaire,a group efficacy questionnaire and a collective action questionnaire.SPSS 17.0 and PROCESS Model 7 were used for data analysis.Results indicate that the use of new media is positively correlated with group relative deprivation,group anger,group efficacy and collective action.The main effect and interaction of group relative deprivation and new media mobilization on collective action are significant.Group anger and group efficacy significantly can predicted collective action,and the mediating effect of group anger and group efficacy is established.New media mobilization significantly moderates group anger and group efficacy.After controlling group anger and group efficacy,new media mobilization has no significant correlation with collective action,and the mediating effect of new media mobilization is established.A conclusion may be safely drawn that new media mobilization has an enhanced moderating effect on the relationship between group relative deprivation and collective action.The moderating effect is mediated by group anger and group efficacy.
引文
[1]Walker,I.,Smith,H.J.Relative deprivation:Specification,development,and integration[M].Cambridge University Press,2002.
[2]Stürmer,S.,Simon,B.The role of collective identification in social movement participation:a panel study in the context of the German gay movement[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2004(3):263.
[3][18]薛婷,等.社会认同对集体行动的作用:群体情绪与效能路径[J].心理学报,2013(8):899-920.
[4]石晶,崔丽娟.舆论支持对集体行动的影响:有中介的调节效应[J].心理研究,2016(1):72-78.
[5]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Fischer,A.H.,Leach,C.W.Put your money where your mouth is!Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2004(5):649-664.
[6]Abrams,D.,Grant,P.R.Testing the social identity relative deprivation(SIRD)model of social change:the political rise of Scottish nationalism[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,2012(4):674-689.
[7]张书维,王二平,周洁.跨情境下集群行为的动因机制[J].心理学报,2012(4):524-545.
[8]Van Zomeren,M.,Leach,C.W.,Spears,R.Protesters as“passionate economists”:a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage[J].Personality&Social Psychology Review,2012(2):180-199.
[9]邓力.新媒体环境下的集体行动动员机制:组织与个体双层面的分析[J].国际新闻界,2016(9):60-74.
[10]Drury,J.,Reicher,S.Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change:Researching Crowds and Power[J].Journal of Social Issues,2010(4):707-725.
[11]Becker,J.C.,Tausch,N.,Wagner,U.Emotional consequences of collective action participation:differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2011(12):1587.
[12]叶宝娟,刘建平,杨强.感觉寻求对工读生病理性网络使用的影响机制[J].心理发展与教育,2014(1):96-104.
[13]Guimond,S.,Dubésimard,L.Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement:The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,1983(44):526-535.
[14]Li,Z.,Tang,X.,Lee,W.B.Collective Threshold Model Based on Utility and Psychological Theories[J].International Journal of Knowledge&Systems Science,2013(4).
[15]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Fischer,A.H.,Leach,C.W.Put your money where your mouth is!Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2004(5):649-664.
[16]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Leach,C.W.Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2010(4):339-346.
[17]Van Zomeren,M.,Postmes,T.,Spears,R.Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action:AQuantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives[J].Psychological Bulletin,2008(4):504-535.
[19]Osborne,D.,Sibley,C.G.Through rose-colored glasses:system-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2013(8):991.
[20]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Leach,C.W.Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2010(4):339-346.
[21]Smith,H.J.,Cronin,T.,Kessler,T.Anger,Fear,or Sadness:Faculty Members'Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage[J].Political Psychology,2008(2):221-246.
[22]张书维,王二平.群体性事件集群行为的动员与组织机制[J].心理科学进展,2011(12):1730-1740.
[2]Stürmer,S.,Simon,B.The role of collective identification in social movement participation:a panel study in the context of the German gay movement[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2004(3):263.
[3][18]薛婷,等.社会认同对集体行动的作用:群体情绪与效能路径[J].心理学报,2013(8):899-920.
[4]石晶,崔丽娟.舆论支持对集体行动的影响:有中介的调节效应[J].心理研究,2016(1):72-78.
[5]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Fischer,A.H.,Leach,C.W.Put your money where your mouth is!Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2004(5):649-664.
[6]Abrams,D.,Grant,P.R.Testing the social identity relative deprivation(SIRD)model of social change:the political rise of Scottish nationalism[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,2012(4):674-689.
[7]张书维,王二平,周洁.跨情境下集群行为的动因机制[J].心理学报,2012(4):524-545.
[8]Van Zomeren,M.,Leach,C.W.,Spears,R.Protesters as“passionate economists”:a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage[J].Personality&Social Psychology Review,2012(2):180-199.
[9]邓力.新媒体环境下的集体行动动员机制:组织与个体双层面的分析[J].国际新闻界,2016(9):60-74.
[10]Drury,J.,Reicher,S.Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change:Researching Crowds and Power[J].Journal of Social Issues,2010(4):707-725.
[11]Becker,J.C.,Tausch,N.,Wagner,U.Emotional consequences of collective action participation:differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2011(12):1587.
[12]叶宝娟,刘建平,杨强.感觉寻求对工读生病理性网络使用的影响机制[J].心理发展与教育,2014(1):96-104.
[13]Guimond,S.,Dubésimard,L.Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement:The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,1983(44):526-535.
[14]Li,Z.,Tang,X.,Lee,W.B.Collective Threshold Model Based on Utility and Psychological Theories[J].International Journal of Knowledge&Systems Science,2013(4).
[15]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Fischer,A.H.,Leach,C.W.Put your money where your mouth is!Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2004(5):649-664.
[16]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Leach,C.W.Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2010(4):339-346.
[17]Van Zomeren,M.,Postmes,T.,Spears,R.Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action:AQuantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives[J].Psychological Bulletin,2008(4):504-535.
[19]Osborne,D.,Sibley,C.G.Through rose-colored glasses:system-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2013(8):991.
[20]Van Zomeren,M.,Spears,R.,Leach,C.W.Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2010(4):339-346.
[21]Smith,H.J.,Cronin,T.,Kessler,T.Anger,Fear,or Sadness:Faculty Members'Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage[J].Political Psychology,2008(2):221-246.
[22]张书维,王二平.群体性事件集群行为的动员与组织机制[J].心理科学进展,2011(12):1730-1740.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |