基于ANP-TOPSIS的煤矿风险预控管理体系有效性评估

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Effectiveness Evaluation of Coal Mine Risk Pre-control Management System Based on ANP-TOPSIS 作者：石甜 ; 李新春 ; 乔万冠 ; 刘全龙 英文作者：SHI Tian;LI Xinchun;QIAO Wanguan;LIU Quanlong;School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology; 关键词：煤矿安全 ; 风险预控管理体系 ; 有效性评估 ; ANP ; 风险决策 ; TOPSIS 英文关键词：coal mine safety;;risk pre-control management system;;effective evaluation;;analytic network process(ANP);;risk decision;;technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) 中文刊名：MKAQ 英文刊名：Safety in Coal Mines 机构：中国矿业大学管理学院; 出版日期：2019-03-20 出版单位：煤矿安全 年：2019 期：v.50;No.537 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71704176) 语种：中文; 页：MKAQ201903057 页数：5 CN：03 ISSN：21-1232/TD 分类号：241-245

摘要

风险预控管理体系的实施降低了煤矿事故的数量和死亡人数,但由于煤矿企业在实施此体系过程中存在着不科学性和不系统性等问题,导致对煤矿事故控制还没达到预期效果。因此,如何科学有效的评估当前煤矿风险预控管理现状显得尤为关键。通过构建基于网络层次分析法(ANP)和耦合逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)的煤矿风险预控管理体系有效性模型,从风险预控管理、保障管理、不安全行为管理、安全要素管理、综合管理和检查、审核与评审6个方面对煤矿风险预控管理体系有效性进行评估,最后以王楼煤矿为例进行实证研究。结果显示,计算参照值为0.51,说明该体系处于一般有效级别。其中该体系有效性的最大的影响因素是保障管理、不安全行为管理和安全要素管理3个方面,应加强对这3个方面的管理以提升其有效性。
        The implementation of the risk pre-control management system has reduced the number of coal mine accidents and the number of deaths. However, due to the unscientific and unsystematic problems existing in the implementation of this system, the coal mine accident control has not achieved the expected effect, scientifically and effectively assess the current status of coal mine risk pre-control management is particularly critical. This paper builds a coal mine risk pre-control management system effectiveness model based on ANP and TOPSIS, the effectiveness of the risk pr e-control management system of coal mine is evaluated from six aspects: risk pr e-control management, safeguard management, personnel unsafe behavior management, production factor management, comprehensive management and inspection, audit and review, finally, Wanglou Coal Mine is taken as an example for empirical study. The results show that the calculated reference value is 0.51, indicating that the system is at a generally effective level. Among them, the most influential factors of the effectiveness of the system are safeguard management, unsafe behavior management and security factor management. The management of these three aspects should be strengthened to enhance its effectiveness.

引文

[1]孟现飞,李新春.煤矿安全风险预控管理体系建设实施指南[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2012.
    [2]李新春,马浩东,李贤功.浅析基于风险预控的煤矿安全管理[J].煤炭工程,2010,42(4):118-119.
    [3]马有才,杨洋,康俊英,等.基于有效投入的煤矿安全生产管理研究[J].煤矿安全,2010,41(9):148-151.
    [4] MustafaKumral. Genetic algorithms for optimization of a mine system under uncertainty[J]. Production Planning&Control, 2004, 15(1):34-41.
    [5] Ghahramani, Abolfazl. Factors that influence the maintenance and improvement of OHSAS 18001 in adopting companies:A qualitative study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137:283-290.
    [6]张雅萍,栗继祖,冯国瑞,等.基于DEA模型的冲突管理对不安全行为意向作用效果的评价[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(6):245-248.
    [7]孙青.煤矿风险预控体系运行效果综合评价实证研究[J].中国煤炭,2015,41(1):108-113.
    [8]姜维维,栗继祖.基于模糊DEA煤矿安全风险预控管理体系评价模型[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(11):238.
    [9]汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2015.
    [10]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [11]贾宝山,尹彬,王翰钊,等.AHP耦合TOPSIS的煤矿安全评价模型及其应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(8):99-105.