水位下降边坡的流-固耦合弹塑性分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Fluid-solid Coupling Elasto-Plastic Model of Slope under Drawdown Condition 作者：杨戒 ; 沈朝辉 ; 吴礼舟 英文作者：YANG Jie;SHEN Chaohui;WU Lizhou;State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology; 关键词：水位下降 ; 边坡稳定性 ; 流-固耦合理论 ; 弹塑性 英文关键词：drawdown;;slope stability;;fluid-solid coupling;;elasto-plasticity 中文刊名：SLFD 英文刊名：Water Power 机构：地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室; 出版日期：2018-12-28 13:20 出版单位：水力发电 年：2019 期：v.45;No.539 基金：国家自然科学基金创新群体项目(41521002) 语种：中文; 页：SLFD201903008 页数：6 CN：03 ISSN：11-1845/TV 分类号：37-41+48

摘要

基于非饱和土流-固耦合理论,建立考虑塑性变形的水位下降边坡模型,研究土体的弹塑性对渗流场、应力场和位移场的影响,并与弹性边坡的耦合计算结果进行比较。结果表明,考虑土体弹塑性对边坡渗流场的影响不大,对应力场的影响主要在坡脚,弹塑性解能反映水位下降时坡脚应力集中向深部发展的现象,而弹性解无此现象;在弹塑性模型中,边坡位移场与饱和渗透系数和水位下降速度有关,且在坡脚更为显著。
        Based on unsaturated fluid-solid coupling theory, a slope model considering plastic deformation under drawdown condition is established to study the effect of soil elasto-plasticity on seepage, stress and displacement, and the results are compared with that of elastic condition. The comparison shows that the elasto-plasticity of soil has little effect on seepage field,and for stress field, the effect is mainly distributed at slope toe. The elasto-plastic solution can reveal the phenomenon of stress concentration developing from slope toe to deep under drawdown, while the elastic solution has no this phenomenon. In elastoplastic model, the displacement field is affected by the permeability of slope and the water level drop rate, particularly at the toe of slope.

引文

[1] NONVEILLER E. The Vajont reservoir slope failure[J]. EngineeringGeology,1987,24(1):493-512.
    [2]赵瑞欣,殷跃平,李滨,等.库水波动下堆积层滑坡稳定性研究[J].水利学报,2017,48(4):435-440.
    [3]刘文月,张林洪,陈加洪,等.库水位变化对库岸路基沉降的影响[J].水文地质工程地质,2016,43(3):141-148.
    [4]赵宇坤,刘汉东,李庆安.洪水浸泡和水位骤降情况下黄河下游堤防堤岸稳定性分析[J].岩土力学,2011,32(5):1495-1499.
    [5]柴军瑞,仵彦卿.碾压混凝土坝渗流场与应力场耦合分析的数学模型[J].水利学报,2000,30(9):33-36.
    [6] PINYOL N M, ALONSO E E, OLIVELLA S. Rapid drawdown inslopes and embankments[J]. Water Resources Research,2008,44(5):303-312.
    [7] ALONSO E E, PINYOL N M. Numerical analysis of rapid drawdown:Applications in real cases[J]. Water Science and Engineering,2016,9(3):175-182.
    [8]郑颖人,唐晓松.库水作用下的边(滑)坡稳定性分析[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(8):1116-1121.
    [9]郑颖人,唐晓松,赵尚毅,等.有限元强度折减法在涉水岸坡工程中的应用[J].水利水运工程学报,2009,4(1):1-8.
    [10]年廷凯,万少石,蒋景彩,等.库水位下降过程中土坡稳定强度折减有限元分析[J].岩土力学,2010,31(7):2264-2271.
    [11]贾苍琴,黄茂松,王贵和.非饱和非稳定渗流作用下土坡稳定分析的强度折减有限元方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(6):1290-1296.
    [12] Van GENUCHETEN M T. A closed form equation for predicting thehydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Societyof America Journal,1980,44(5):892-898.
    [13]孙德安.非饱和土的水力和力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J].岩土力学,2009,30(11):3217-3230.
    [14] CHEN W F, MIZUNO E. Nonlinear analysis in soil mechanics:Theory and implementation(Developments in geotechnical engineer-ing)[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science,1990.
    [15]李智慧.坡前水位降落对边坡稳定性影响模型试验与数值分析研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2012.