2018年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2019年展望——土地经济分报告
|
摘要
研究目的:梳理并比较2018年国内外土地经济领域研究进展和研究重点,展望未来研究方向。研究方法:文献法。研究结果:2018年,土地价格、土地市场化、土地产权安排、土地征收和土地改革等是国内外共同的研究焦点。国外研究关注城市土地价格的变化趋势、土地市场不完善的原因、产权稳定性与生产效率的关系、土地改革的成效等,而国内研究重点关注农地流转的意愿和价格、失地农民的福利、产权稳定性与农业投资的关系、土地制度演化变迁过程以及集体土地"三权分置"等问题。研究结论:2018年,土地经济领域研究在土地制度变迁过程、土地流转市场新体系、土地供给、土地细碎化、征地影响因素等方面有所进展。2019年将重点关注实现乡村振兴的土地政策、宅基地"三权分置"改革、农村土地制度改革试点跟踪评估、土地经营权流转和融资担保制度等。
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the research progress on land economics in 2018 and give prospect in 2019. The method of literature review was employed. The results indicate that land price, land marketization, land property rights, land expropriation and land reform were discussed extensively all around the world in 2018. Overseas studies paid more attention to the trend of urban land price fluctuations, the reasons for imperfect land market, the relationship between property rights stability and production efficiency and the effects of land reform, while domestic studies focused on the willingness and price of farmland transfer, the welfare of landless farmers, the relationship between property rights stability and agricultural investment, the evolution of land institution and the tripartite rural land entitlement system. In conclusion, in 2018, the research in the field of land economics made progress in the process of land institutional change, new market system of land transfer, land supply, land fragmentation, and factors affecting land expropriation. In 2019, the research should focus on land policies for rural revitalization, institutional reform of tripartite rural residential land entitlement system, evaluation of pilot projects for rural land institutional reform, institutional arrangement for collective construction land to enter the market, the transfer of land rights and its related institutions of financing guarantee.
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the research progress on land economics in 2018 and give prospect in 2019. The method of literature review was employed. The results indicate that land price, land marketization, land property rights, land expropriation and land reform were discussed extensively all around the world in 2018. Overseas studies paid more attention to the trend of urban land price fluctuations, the reasons for imperfect land market, the relationship between property rights stability and production efficiency and the effects of land reform, while domestic studies focused on the willingness and price of farmland transfer, the welfare of landless farmers, the relationship between property rights stability and agricultural investment, the evolution of land institution and the tripartite rural land entitlement system. In conclusion, in 2018, the research in the field of land economics made progress in the process of land institutional change, new market system of land transfer, land supply, land fragmentation, and factors affecting land expropriation. In 2019, the research should focus on land policies for rural revitalization, institutional reform of tripartite rural residential land entitlement system, evaluation of pilot projects for rural land institutional reform, institutional arrangement for collective construction land to enter the market, the transfer of land rights and its related institutions of financing guarantee.
引文
[1]韩立彬,陆铭.供需错配:解开中国房价分化之谜[J].世界经济,2018,41(10):126-149.
[2]余亮亮,蔡银莺.土地供给结构、财政压力与房价——来自广东省的经验分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):30-36.
[3]张清源,苏国灿,梁若冰.增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨——利用“撤县设区”的准实验研究[J].财贸经济,2018,39(4):20-34.
[4]全世文,胡历芳,曾寅初,等.论中国农村土地的过度资本化[J].中国农村经济,2018(7):2-18.
[5]朱文珏,罗必良.农地价格幻觉:由价值评价差异引发的农地流转市场配置“失灵”——基于全国9省(区)农户的微观数据[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):67-81.
[6]王倩,任倩,余劲.粮食主产区农地流转农户议价能力实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2018(2):47-59.
[7]焦娜.地权安全性会改变农户投资行为吗——基于CHARLS2011和2013年数据的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2018(9):42-53.
[8]林善浪,叶炜,梁琳.家庭生命周期对农户农地流转意愿的影响研究——基于福建省1570份调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):68-73.
[9]宋敏,王登娜.省域农地城市流转规模及其影响因素作用的空间异质性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(1):54-62.
[10]江激宇,张士云,李博伟.社会资本、流转契约与土地长期投资[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(3):67-75.
[11]甘臣林,谭永海,陈璐,等.基于TPB框架的农户认知对农地转出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(5):152-159.
[12]曾雅婷,吕亚荣,刘文勇.农地流转提升了粮食生产技术效率吗——来自农户的视角[J].农业技术经济,2018(3):41-55.
[13]钱龙,袁航,刘景景,等.农地流转影响粮食种植结构分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(8):63-74.
[14]贾蕊,陆迁.土地流转促进黄土高原区农户水土保持措施的实施吗?——基于集体行动中介作用与政府补贴调节效应的分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(6):38-54.
[15]匡远配,周丽.农地流转与农村减贫——基于湖南省贫困地区的检验[J].农业技术经济,2018(7):64-70.
[16]袁航,段鹏飞,刘景景.关于农业效率对农户农地流转行为影响争议的一个解答——基于农户模型(AHM)与CFPS数据的分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(10):4-16.
[17]郭君平,曲颂,夏英,等.农村土地流转的收入分配效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(5):160-169.
[18]聂英,聂鑫宇.农村土地流转增值收益分配的博弈分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(3):122-132.
[19]匡远配,陆钰凤.我国农地流转“内卷化”陷阱及其出路[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):33-43.
[20]王雪琪,曹铁毅,邹伟.地方政府干预农地流转对生产效率的影响——基于水稻种植户的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(9):133-141.
[21]WANG J, LIN Y, ANTHONY G, et al. Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes[J]. Land Use Policy. 2018, 75:375-387.
[22]ZHANG X, YE Y, WANG M, et al. The micro administrative mechanism of land reallocation in land consolidation:a perspective from collective action[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 70:547-558.
[23]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化?——基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[24]徐升艳,陈杰,赵刚.土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长[J].中国工业经济,2018(3):44-61.
[25]甄江,黄季焜.乡镇农地经营权流转平台发展趋势及其驱动力研究[J].农业技术经济,2018(7):33-40.
[26]唐云锋,吴琦琦.土地财政制度对房地产价格的影响因素研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018(3):43-56.
[27]梅冬州,崔小勇,吴娱.房价变动、土地财政与中国经济波动[J].经济研究,2018(1):35-49.
[28]牟燕,钱忠好.地方政府土地财政依赖一定会推高城市一级土地市场化水平吗?——基于2003—2015年中国省级面板数据的检验[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(10):8-13,35.
[29]张莉,年永威,刘京军.土地市场波动与地方债——以城投债为例[J].经济学(季刊),2018(3):1103-1126.
[30]唐鹏,石晓平,曲福田.政府管制、土地违法与土地财政[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):15-21.
[31]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等. 2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究——17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018(3):98-108.
[32]戴青兰.农村土地产权制度变迁背景下农村集体经济的演进与发展[J].农村经济,2018(4):42-48.
[33]应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资——基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察,2018(3):110-127.
[34]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性?——基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):118-127.
[35]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗?——基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(5):92-102.
[36]许恒周,田浩辰.农户生计多样化视角下农地确权政策实施效果评估——基于1254份农户问卷的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018(2):30-36.
[37]仇童伟,罗必良.种植结构“趋粮化”的动因何在?——基于农地产权与要素配置的作用机理及实证研究[J].中国农村经济,2018(2):65-80.
[38]杨宏力.新一轮农村土地确权存在的问题及政策优化——基于山东省五市七镇的经验研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(3):110-121.
[39]曲颂,郭君平,夏英.确权和调整化解了农地纠纷吗?——基于7省村级层面数据的实证分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):71-78.
[40]黄鹏进.产权秩序转型:农村集体土地纠纷的一个宏观解释[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):86-932.
[41]YE L, HUANG X, YANG H, et al. Effects of dual land ownerships and different land lease terms on industrial land use efficiency in Wuxi City, East China[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 78:21-28.
[42]CAO Y, ZHANG X. Are they satisfied with land taking?aspects on procedural fairness, monetary compensation and behavioral simulation in China’s land expropriation story[J].Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:166-178.
[43]CAI M, SUN X. Institutional bindingness, power structure,and land expropriation in China[J]. World Development,2018, 109:172-186.
[44]CAO Y, MARTIN D, LINDSAY C, et al. Land expropriation compensation among multiple stakeholders in a mining area:explaining “skeleton house” compensation[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:97-110.
[45]朱月季,许海平,刘玲.土地征收对农户生活消费与人力资本投资的影响研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):151-159.
[46]陈美球,廖彩荣,冯广京,等.农村集体经济组织成员权的实现研究——基于“土地征收视角下农村集体经济组织成员权实现研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):58-64.
[47]马志雄,王娟,丁士军.被征地农户的生计转型:“土地换货币”可行吗?[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):144-150.
[48]姜海,李武星,雷昊,等.基于博弈实验的上级政府干预对征地交易成本影响分析[J].中国土地科学,2018(4):36-43.
[49]刘守英.土地制度变革与经济结构转型——对中国40年发展经验的一个经济解释[J].中国土地科学,2018(1):1-10.
[50]刘凯.中国特色的土地制度如何影响中国经济增长——基于多部门动态一般均衡框架的分析[J].中国工业经济,2018(10):80-98.
[51]MO J. Land financing and economic growth:evidence from Chinese counties[J]. China Economic Review, 2018, 50:219-239.
[52]刘新平,胡如梅,宋子秋.建设项目用地预审制度变迁的理论逻辑、演化特征与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2018(3):14-20.
[53]李永乐,胡晓波,魏后凯.“三维”政府竞争——以地方政府土地出让为例[J].政治学研究,2018(1):47-58,127.
[54]王博,吕沛璐,冯淑怡,等.中国建设用地配置中政府失灵的理论解析及其改良框架设计[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):20-28.
[55]WANG Y, LI X, LI W, et al. Land titling program and farmland rental market participation in China:evidence from pilot provinces[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:281-290.
[56]丰雷.新制度经济学视角下的中国农地制度变迁:回顾与展望[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):8-15.
[57]李先东,李录堂,米巧.中国土地制度的历史追溯与反思[J].农业经济问题,2018(4):43-49.
[58]赵金龙,王丽萍.改革开放以来我国农地产权政策演变及未来展望[J].经济纵横,2018(5):89-96.
[59]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):46-57.
[60]孔祥利,赵娜.农业转型:引入土地制度变迁的生产函数重建[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(5):34-42.
[61]吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊.农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施——基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):46-63.
[62]韩振华.完善农地“三权分置”制度——一个基于“国家土地调节权”的新视角[J].政治经济学评论,2018(5):144-169.
[63]MCALLISTER P, SHEPHERD E, WYATT P. Policy shifts,developer contributions and land value capture in London2005-2017[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 78:316-326.
[64]TELLES T S, REYDON B P, MAIA A G. Effects of no-tillage on agricultural land values in Brazil[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 76:124-129.
[65]RICKER-GILBERT J, CHAMBERLIN J. Transaction costs,land rental markets, and their impact on youth access to agriculture in Tanzania[J]. Land Economics, 2018, 94(4):541-555.
[66]MILCZAREK-ANDRZEJEWSKAD,ZAWALI SKA K, CZARNECKI A. Land-use conflicts and the common agricultural policy:evidence from Poland[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73:423-433.
[67]HANSON ED, SHERRICK BJ, KUETHE TH. The changing roles of urban influence and agricultural productivity in farmland price determination[J]. Land Economics, 2018,94(2):199-205.
[68]DEININGER K, JIN S, LIU Y, et al. Can labor-market imperfections explain changes in the inverse farm sizeproductivity relationship? Longitudinal evidence from rural India[J]. Land Economics, 2018, 94(2):239-258.
[69]LOOGA J, J RGENSON E, SIKK K, et al. Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity:the case of Estonia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79:285-292.
[70]CIAIANP,GURIF,RAJCANIOVAM,etal.Land fragmentation and production diversification:a case study from rural Albania[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 76:589-599.
[71]BUKARI KN, KUUSAANA ED. Impacts of large-scale land holdings on Fulani pastoralists’ in the Agogo Traditional Area of Ghana[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79:748-758.
[72]ALLAHYARI MS, DAMALAS CA, MASOULEH ZD, et al.Land consolidation success in paddy fields of northern Iran:an assessment based on farmers’ satisfaction[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 3:95-101.
[73]MURAOKA R, JIN S, JAYNE TS. Land access, land rental and food security:evidence from Kenya[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 70:611-622.
[74]ZENG D, ALWANG J, NORTON G, et al. Land ownership and technology adoption revisited:improved maize varieties in Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72:270-9.
[75]NGUYEN H, DUAN J, LIU J. State control versus hybrid land markets:planning and urban development in transitional hanoi, vietnam[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10:2993.
[76]STEFANO M. Property as a human right and property as a special title. Rediscussing private ownership of land[J].Land Use Policy, 2018, 70:273-280.
[77]CHUSAK W, IAN G B. Communal land titling dilemmas in northern Thailand:from community forestry to beneficial yet risky and uncertain options[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71:320-328.
[78]EMILY A S, JENNIFER A G. Labor scarcity, land tenure,and historical legacy:evidence from Mexico[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 135:504-516.
[79]ADENEW T A, JASPER V, PETER H. Farmers’ participation in the development of land use policies for the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71:129-137.
[80]MULATU W. Policies and praxis of land acquisition, use,and development in Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73:170-183.
[81]HUSEN A T. Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 70:247-255.
[82]SERGE G, HITOSHI N. Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law2013-01[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 78:61-69.
[83]JYOTIR.Fundamentalfunctioningsoflandowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of ‘capability[’J]. Land Use Policy.2018, 72:74-84.
[84]OLAYINKA I K. The determinants of large-scale land investments in Africa[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75:180-190.
[85]TALAN B. Redistributive land reform and structural change in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwai[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 3:732-761.
[86]DYLAN F. Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J]. World Development, 2018, 103:155-167.
[87]ANDRIES D T. Without the blanket of the land:agrarian change and biopolitics in post-apartheid South Africa[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2018, 45:1086-1107.
[88]BRENT H, NAVRUZ N. Land reform by default:uncovering patterns of agricultural decollectivization in Tajikistan[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2018, 45:409-430.
[89]OLIVIER P, MARCEL K, FATAH A. From worker to peasant and then to entrepreneur? Land reform and agrarian change in the Sa ss(Morocco[)J]. World Development, 2018, 105:119-131.
[2]余亮亮,蔡银莺.土地供给结构、财政压力与房价——来自广东省的经验分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):30-36.
[3]张清源,苏国灿,梁若冰.增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨——利用“撤县设区”的准实验研究[J].财贸经济,2018,39(4):20-34.
[4]全世文,胡历芳,曾寅初,等.论中国农村土地的过度资本化[J].中国农村经济,2018(7):2-18.
[5]朱文珏,罗必良.农地价格幻觉:由价值评价差异引发的农地流转市场配置“失灵”——基于全国9省(区)农户的微观数据[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):67-81.
[6]王倩,任倩,余劲.粮食主产区农地流转农户议价能力实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2018(2):47-59.
[7]焦娜.地权安全性会改变农户投资行为吗——基于CHARLS2011和2013年数据的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2018(9):42-53.
[8]林善浪,叶炜,梁琳.家庭生命周期对农户农地流转意愿的影响研究——基于福建省1570份调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):68-73.
[9]宋敏,王登娜.省域农地城市流转规模及其影响因素作用的空间异质性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(1):54-62.
[10]江激宇,张士云,李博伟.社会资本、流转契约与土地长期投资[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(3):67-75.
[11]甘臣林,谭永海,陈璐,等.基于TPB框架的农户认知对农地转出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(5):152-159.
[12]曾雅婷,吕亚荣,刘文勇.农地流转提升了粮食生产技术效率吗——来自农户的视角[J].农业技术经济,2018(3):41-55.
[13]钱龙,袁航,刘景景,等.农地流转影响粮食种植结构分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(8):63-74.
[14]贾蕊,陆迁.土地流转促进黄土高原区农户水土保持措施的实施吗?——基于集体行动中介作用与政府补贴调节效应的分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(6):38-54.
[15]匡远配,周丽.农地流转与农村减贫——基于湖南省贫困地区的检验[J].农业技术经济,2018(7):64-70.
[16]袁航,段鹏飞,刘景景.关于农业效率对农户农地流转行为影响争议的一个解答——基于农户模型(AHM)与CFPS数据的分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(10):4-16.
[17]郭君平,曲颂,夏英,等.农村土地流转的收入分配效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(5):160-169.
[18]聂英,聂鑫宇.农村土地流转增值收益分配的博弈分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(3):122-132.
[19]匡远配,陆钰凤.我国农地流转“内卷化”陷阱及其出路[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):33-43.
[20]王雪琪,曹铁毅,邹伟.地方政府干预农地流转对生产效率的影响——基于水稻种植户的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(9):133-141.
[21]WANG J, LIN Y, ANTHONY G, et al. Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes[J]. Land Use Policy. 2018, 75:375-387.
[22]ZHANG X, YE Y, WANG M, et al. The micro administrative mechanism of land reallocation in land consolidation:a perspective from collective action[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 70:547-558.
[23]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化?——基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[24]徐升艳,陈杰,赵刚.土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长[J].中国工业经济,2018(3):44-61.
[25]甄江,黄季焜.乡镇农地经营权流转平台发展趋势及其驱动力研究[J].农业技术经济,2018(7):33-40.
[26]唐云锋,吴琦琦.土地财政制度对房地产价格的影响因素研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018(3):43-56.
[27]梅冬州,崔小勇,吴娱.房价变动、土地财政与中国经济波动[J].经济研究,2018(1):35-49.
[28]牟燕,钱忠好.地方政府土地财政依赖一定会推高城市一级土地市场化水平吗?——基于2003—2015年中国省级面板数据的检验[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(10):8-13,35.
[29]张莉,年永威,刘京军.土地市场波动与地方债——以城投债为例[J].经济学(季刊),2018(3):1103-1126.
[30]唐鹏,石晓平,曲福田.政府管制、土地违法与土地财政[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):15-21.
[31]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等. 2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究——17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018(3):98-108.
[32]戴青兰.农村土地产权制度变迁背景下农村集体经济的演进与发展[J].农村经济,2018(4):42-48.
[33]应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资——基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察,2018(3):110-127.
[34]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性?——基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018(9):118-127.
[35]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗?——基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(5):92-102.
[36]许恒周,田浩辰.农户生计多样化视角下农地确权政策实施效果评估——基于1254份农户问卷的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018(2):30-36.
[37]仇童伟,罗必良.种植结构“趋粮化”的动因何在?——基于农地产权与要素配置的作用机理及实证研究[J].中国农村经济,2018(2):65-80.
[38]杨宏力.新一轮农村土地确权存在的问题及政策优化——基于山东省五市七镇的经验研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(3):110-121.
[39]曲颂,郭君平,夏英.确权和调整化解了农地纠纷吗?——基于7省村级层面数据的实证分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):71-78.
[40]黄鹏进.产权秩序转型:农村集体土地纠纷的一个宏观解释[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):86-932.
[41]YE L, HUANG X, YANG H, et al. Effects of dual land ownerships and different land lease terms on industrial land use efficiency in Wuxi City, East China[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 78:21-28.
[42]CAO Y, ZHANG X. Are they satisfied with land taking?aspects on procedural fairness, monetary compensation and behavioral simulation in China’s land expropriation story[J].Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:166-178.
[43]CAI M, SUN X. Institutional bindingness, power structure,and land expropriation in China[J]. World Development,2018, 109:172-186.
[44]CAO Y, MARTIN D, LINDSAY C, et al. Land expropriation compensation among multiple stakeholders in a mining area:explaining “skeleton house” compensation[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:97-110.
[45]朱月季,许海平,刘玲.土地征收对农户生活消费与人力资本投资的影响研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):151-159.
[46]陈美球,廖彩荣,冯广京,等.农村集体经济组织成员权的实现研究——基于“土地征收视角下农村集体经济组织成员权实现研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):58-64.
[47]马志雄,王娟,丁士军.被征地农户的生计转型:“土地换货币”可行吗?[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):144-150.
[48]姜海,李武星,雷昊,等.基于博弈实验的上级政府干预对征地交易成本影响分析[J].中国土地科学,2018(4):36-43.
[49]刘守英.土地制度变革与经济结构转型——对中国40年发展经验的一个经济解释[J].中国土地科学,2018(1):1-10.
[50]刘凯.中国特色的土地制度如何影响中国经济增长——基于多部门动态一般均衡框架的分析[J].中国工业经济,2018(10):80-98.
[51]MO J. Land financing and economic growth:evidence from Chinese counties[J]. China Economic Review, 2018, 50:219-239.
[52]刘新平,胡如梅,宋子秋.建设项目用地预审制度变迁的理论逻辑、演化特征与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2018(3):14-20.
[53]李永乐,胡晓波,魏后凯.“三维”政府竞争——以地方政府土地出让为例[J].政治学研究,2018(1):47-58,127.
[54]王博,吕沛璐,冯淑怡,等.中国建设用地配置中政府失灵的理论解析及其改良框架设计[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):20-28.
[55]WANG Y, LI X, LI W, et al. Land titling program and farmland rental market participation in China:evidence from pilot provinces[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74:281-290.
[56]丰雷.新制度经济学视角下的中国农地制度变迁:回顾与展望[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):8-15.
[57]李先东,李录堂,米巧.中国土地制度的历史追溯与反思[J].农业经济问题,2018(4):43-49.
[58]赵金龙,王丽萍.改革开放以来我国农地产权政策演变及未来展望[J].经济纵横,2018(5):89-96.
[59]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):46-57.
[60]孔祥利,赵娜.农业转型:引入土地制度变迁的生产函数重建[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(5):34-42.
[61]吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊.农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施——基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):46-63.
[62]韩振华.完善农地“三权分置”制度——一个基于“国家土地调节权”的新视角[J].政治经济学评论,2018(5):144-169.
[63]MCALLISTER P, SHEPHERD E, WYATT P. Policy shifts,developer contributions and land value capture in London2005-2017[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 78:316-326.
[64]TELLES T S, REYDON B P, MAIA A G. Effects of no-tillage on agricultural land values in Brazil[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 76:124-129.
[65]RICKER-GILBERT J, CHAMBERLIN J. Transaction costs,land rental markets, and their impact on youth access to agriculture in Tanzania[J]. Land Economics, 2018, 94(4):541-555.
[66]MILCZAREK-ANDRZEJEWSKAD,ZAWALI SKA K, CZARNECKI A. Land-use conflicts and the common agricultural policy:evidence from Poland[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73:423-433.
[67]HANSON ED, SHERRICK BJ, KUETHE TH. The changing roles of urban influence and agricultural productivity in farmland price determination[J]. Land Economics, 2018,94(2):199-205.
[68]DEININGER K, JIN S, LIU Y, et al. Can labor-market imperfections explain changes in the inverse farm sizeproductivity relationship? Longitudinal evidence from rural India[J]. Land Economics, 2018, 94(2):239-258.
[69]LOOGA J, J RGENSON E, SIKK K, et al. Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity:the case of Estonia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79:285-292.
[70]CIAIANP,GURIF,RAJCANIOVAM,etal.Land fragmentation and production diversification:a case study from rural Albania[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 76:589-599.
[71]BUKARI KN, KUUSAANA ED. Impacts of large-scale land holdings on Fulani pastoralists’ in the Agogo Traditional Area of Ghana[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79:748-758.
[72]ALLAHYARI MS, DAMALAS CA, MASOULEH ZD, et al.Land consolidation success in paddy fields of northern Iran:an assessment based on farmers’ satisfaction[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 3:95-101.
[73]MURAOKA R, JIN S, JAYNE TS. Land access, land rental and food security:evidence from Kenya[J]. Land Use Policy,2018, 70:611-622.
[74]ZENG D, ALWANG J, NORTON G, et al. Land ownership and technology adoption revisited:improved maize varieties in Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72:270-9.
[75]NGUYEN H, DUAN J, LIU J. State control versus hybrid land markets:planning and urban development in transitional hanoi, vietnam[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10:2993.
[76]STEFANO M. Property as a human right and property as a special title. Rediscussing private ownership of land[J].Land Use Policy, 2018, 70:273-280.
[77]CHUSAK W, IAN G B. Communal land titling dilemmas in northern Thailand:from community forestry to beneficial yet risky and uncertain options[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71:320-328.
[78]EMILY A S, JENNIFER A G. Labor scarcity, land tenure,and historical legacy:evidence from Mexico[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 135:504-516.
[79]ADENEW T A, JASPER V, PETER H. Farmers’ participation in the development of land use policies for the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71:129-137.
[80]MULATU W. Policies and praxis of land acquisition, use,and development in Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73:170-183.
[81]HUSEN A T. Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 70:247-255.
[82]SERGE G, HITOSHI N. Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law2013-01[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 78:61-69.
[83]JYOTIR.Fundamentalfunctioningsoflandowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of ‘capability[’J]. Land Use Policy.2018, 72:74-84.
[84]OLAYINKA I K. The determinants of large-scale land investments in Africa[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75:180-190.
[85]TALAN B. Redistributive land reform and structural change in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwai[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 3:732-761.
[86]DYLAN F. Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J]. World Development, 2018, 103:155-167.
[87]ANDRIES D T. Without the blanket of the land:agrarian change and biopolitics in post-apartheid South Africa[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2018, 45:1086-1107.
[88]BRENT H, NAVRUZ N. Land reform by default:uncovering patterns of agricultural decollectivization in Tajikistan[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2018, 45:409-430.
[89]OLIVIER P, MARCEL K, FATAH A. From worker to peasant and then to entrepreneur? Land reform and agrarian change in the Sa ss(Morocco[)J]. World Development, 2018, 105:119-131.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |