乳腺X线摄影及超声鉴别诊断乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Differential diagnosis of phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma of breast using mammography and ultrasonography 作者：汪思娜 ; 徐维敏 ; 秦耿耿 ; 文婵娟 ; 曾辉 ; 何子龙 ; 徐泽园 ; 陈卫国 英文作者：WANG Sina;XU Weimin;QIN Genggeng;WEN Chanjuan;ZENG Hui;HE Zilong;XU Zeyuan;CHEN Weiguo;Department of Radiology,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University; 关键词：叶状瘤 ; 纤维腺瘤 ; 乳房X线摄影术 ; 超声检查 英文关键词：phyllodes tumor;;fibroadenoma;;mammography;;ultrasonography 中文刊名：ZYXX 英文刊名：Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology 机构：南方医科大学南方医院放射科; 出版日期：2019-03-20 出版单位：中国医学影像技术 年：2019 期：v.35;No.310 基金：南方医科大学南方医院院长基金(2015C026);南方医科大学临床研究启动计划(LC2016ZD018) 语种：中文; 页：ZYXX201903016 页数：5 CN：03 ISSN：11-1881/R 分类号：47-51

摘要

目的探讨乳腺X线摄影及超声诊断及鉴别诊断乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析并比较经病理证实的110例乳腺叶状肿瘤和102例纤维腺瘤患者的临床、X线和超声特征。结果乳腺纤维腺瘤最大径(2.71±1.44)cm,叶状肿瘤最大径(4.61±3.35)cm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。乳腺良性与恶性叶状肿瘤最大径差异有统计学意义(P=0.024)。X线检查发现乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤在形状、边界、密度及内部钙化差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);超声发现两者形状、边界、内部囊变、后方回声及血流分级差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。良性、交界性与恶性叶状肿瘤中,肿块内部是否囊变差异有统计学意义(P=0.006)。结论综合分析乳腺X线、超声及临床特点可以初步鉴别乳腺纤维腺瘤与叶状肿瘤,当肿块最大径>3.0 cm,呈分叶状高密度、伴有内部囊变、血流信号较丰富时提示叶状肿瘤。
        Objective To assess the clinical value of mammography and ultrasonography in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma.Methods Clinical,mammographic and sonographic findings were retrospectively analyzed and compared in 110 women with phyllodes tumor and 102 women with fibroadenoma confirmed by surgical pathology.Results The maximum diameter of phyllodes tumor([4.61±3.35]cm)and fibroadenoma([2.71±1.44]cm)were statistically different(P<0.001),and the difference of maximum diameter between benign and malignant phyllodes tumor was statistically significant(P=0.024).The mammogram parameters of tumor shape,margin,density and calcification were statistically different between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma(all P<0.05),and ultrasonography showed statistically significant differences in tumor shape,margin,internal cystic regions,posterior echo,blood flow classification(all P<0.05).Among the benign,borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors,the difference of cystic regions inside the tumor was statistically significant(P=0.006).Conclusion Combination of mammographic,sonographic and clinical findings can initially identify phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma.When the tumor is large(>3.0 cm),lobulated,high density with internal cystic regions and abundant blood flow signal,phyllodes tumor should be considered.

引文

[1] Gatta G, Iaselli F, Parlato V, et al. Differential diagnosis between fibroadenoma, giant fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour: Sonographic features and core needle biopsy. Radiol Med, 2011,116(6):905-918.
    [2] Ben Hassouna J, Damak T, Gamoudi A, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: A case series of 106 patients. Am J Surg, 2006,192(2):141-147.
    [3] Jang JH, Choi MY, Lee SK, et al. Clinicopathologic risk factors for the local recurrence of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012,19(8):2612-2617.
    [4] American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS-mammography//ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003:13-162.
    [5] Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: Preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990,16(6):553-559.
    [6] 黄泽楠,曾维根,刘宇,等.乳腺叶状肿瘤60例临床病理分析.中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2014(3):42-45.
    [7] 崔岩,李子桢.乳腺纤维腺瘤与分叶状肿瘤超声表现的对照分析.河北医学,2018,24(3):485-489.
    [8] Tan H, Zhang S, Liu H, et al. Imaging findings in phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81(1):e62-e69.
    [9] Yilmaz E, Sal S,Lebe B. Differentiation of phyllodes tumors versus fibroadenomas. Acta Radiol, 2002,43(1):34-39.
    [10] 朱浩凤,张立秋,周海.乳腺叶状肿瘤的钼靶X线、超声表现与病理对照分析.中国医学影像学杂志,2010,18(1):5-8.
    [11] 董晓燕,程遵华,薛晓红,等.乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤高频超声特征的对比分析.中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2018,16(1):35-38.
    [12] 陈圆圆,刘军杰,李智贤,等.乳腺叶状肿瘤的二维超声、CDFI及超声弹性成像特征分析.中国医学影像技术,2013,29(11):1778-1781.
    [13] Tse GM, Ma TK, Chan KF, et al. Increased microvessel density in malignant and borderline mammary phyllodes tumours. Histopathology, 2001,38(6):567-570.