基于Gini准则的客观组合评价方法研究——以高技术产业技术创新能力评价为例
|
摘要
为了解决多方法评价结论的非一致性问题,提出了一种基于Gini准则的客观组合评价方法。该方法按照每种评价方法的评价值所提供的信息纯度对每种评价方法赋予相应的权重,信息纯度越大,则相应地赋予越大的权重,然后按照赋予的权重进行客观组合评价。并以高技术产业技术创新能力评价为例,验证了Gini准则客观组合评价方法的可操作和相对有效性。基于Gini准则的客观组合评价方法为解决多方法评价结论的非一致性问题提供了新的思路,是组合评价方法研究的有益补充。
A combinational evaluation method based on Gini criterion is proposed in order to get rid of the inconsistency among evaluation results from different evaluation methods. According to the information purity of the results of each evaluation method, the method gives the corresponding weight of each evaluation method. The greater the purity of the information, the greater the correspondingly imparting weights, and then we give the weights combination evaluation. The operability and relative effectiveness of this evaluation method are verified by the evaluation of the high tech industry technological innovation capability. The method proposed in this study gives an idea in dealing with the inconsistency among dynamic evaluation results, helpfully complements the comprehensive evaluation method.
A combinational evaluation method based on Gini criterion is proposed in order to get rid of the inconsistency among evaluation results from different evaluation methods. According to the information purity of the results of each evaluation method, the method gives the corresponding weight of each evaluation method. The greater the purity of the information, the greater the correspondingly imparting weights, and then we give the weights combination evaluation. The operability and relative effectiveness of this evaluation method are verified by the evaluation of the high tech industry technological innovation capability. The method proposed in this study gives an idea in dealing with the inconsistency among dynamic evaluation results, helpfully complements the comprehensive evaluation method.
引文
[1] 潘雄锋,刘清,彭晓雪.基于全局熵值法模型的我国区域创新能力动态评价与分析[J].运筹与管理,2015,04:155-162.
[2] 范德成,杜明月.基于TOPSIS灰色关联投影法的高技术产业技术创新能力动态综合评价——以京津冀一体化为视角[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(07):154-163.
[3] 李美娟,魏寅坤,徐林明.基于灰靶理论的区域协同创新能力动态评价与分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(08):122-132.
[4] 陈伟,杨早立,周文,朗益夫.基于突变级数的知识密集型制造业技术创新能力动态综合评价——变化速度特征的视角[J].运筹与管理,2015,01:191-201.
[5] 宋彦蓉,张宝元.基于地区现代化评价的客观赋权法比较[J].统计与决策,2015,(11):82- 86.
[6] 范德成,李昊.中国产业结构演化影响因素评价[J].中国科技论坛,2016,(09):51-57.
[7] Jain V. Ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system by using a combined multiple attribute decision making method[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2013, 14(3): 125-141.
[8] 张发明,刘志平.组合评价方法研究综述[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(04):557-569.
[9] 郭亚军,易平涛.一种基于整体差异的客观组合评价法[J].中国管理科学,2006,03:60- 64.
[10] Rao R V, Singh D. Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection[J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2012, 3(3): 365-382.
[11] Dewangan S, Chattopadhyaya S. Discussion on ranking the sawability of rocks using a combined multiple attribute decision making method[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 592-594: 864- 868.
[12] Qin J, Liu X. Multi-attribute group decision making using combined ranking value under interval type-2 fuzzy environment[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 297(C): 293-315.
[13] Chen S M, Tsai W H. Multiple attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, s367-368: 1045-1065.
[14] 柳玉鹏,李一军.基于降维思想的客观组合评价模型[J].运筹与管理,2009,04:38- 43.
[15] 张立军,陈跃,袁能文.基于信度分析的加权组合评价模型研究[J].管理评论,2012,05:170-176.
[16] 李珠瑞,马溪骏,彭张林.基于离差最大化的组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,01:174-179.
[17] 张发明.一种融合相似与差异特征的组合评价方法及应用[J].系统管理学报,2013,04:498-504.
[18] 曾宪报.关于组合评价法的事前事后检验[J].统计研究,1997,06:56-58.
[19] Breiman L, Friedman J H, Olshen R, et al. Classification and regression trees[J]. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 1984, 40(3): 582-588.
[20] 薛晖,郑中华,谢启伟.基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J].中国管理科学,2014,04:98-104.
[21] 李刚,程砚秋,董霖哲,王文君.基尼系数客观赋权方法研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(01):12-22.
[22] 谷炜,杜秀亭,卫李蓉.基于因子分析法的中国规模以上工业企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(01):84- 87.
[23] 罗洪云,张庆普.知识管理视角下新创科技型小企业突破性技术创新能力评价指标体系构建及测度[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(01):175-184.
[24] 杜丹丽,曾小春.速度特征视角的我国高新技术企业创新能力动态综合评价研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(07):44-53.
[25] 郭亚军,马赞福,张发明.组合评价方法的相对有效性分析及应用[J].中国管理科学,2009,02:125-130.
[2] 范德成,杜明月.基于TOPSIS灰色关联投影法的高技术产业技术创新能力动态综合评价——以京津冀一体化为视角[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(07):154-163.
[3] 李美娟,魏寅坤,徐林明.基于灰靶理论的区域协同创新能力动态评价与分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(08):122-132.
[4] 陈伟,杨早立,周文,朗益夫.基于突变级数的知识密集型制造业技术创新能力动态综合评价——变化速度特征的视角[J].运筹与管理,2015,01:191-201.
[5] 宋彦蓉,张宝元.基于地区现代化评价的客观赋权法比较[J].统计与决策,2015,(11):82- 86.
[6] 范德成,李昊.中国产业结构演化影响因素评价[J].中国科技论坛,2016,(09):51-57.
[7] Jain V. Ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system by using a combined multiple attribute decision making method[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2013, 14(3): 125-141.
[8] 张发明,刘志平.组合评价方法研究综述[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(04):557-569.
[9] 郭亚军,易平涛.一种基于整体差异的客观组合评价法[J].中国管理科学,2006,03:60- 64.
[10] Rao R V, Singh D. Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection[J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2012, 3(3): 365-382.
[11] Dewangan S, Chattopadhyaya S. Discussion on ranking the sawability of rocks using a combined multiple attribute decision making method[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 592-594: 864- 868.
[12] Qin J, Liu X. Multi-attribute group decision making using combined ranking value under interval type-2 fuzzy environment[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 297(C): 293-315.
[13] Chen S M, Tsai W H. Multiple attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, s367-368: 1045-1065.
[14] 柳玉鹏,李一军.基于降维思想的客观组合评价模型[J].运筹与管理,2009,04:38- 43.
[15] 张立军,陈跃,袁能文.基于信度分析的加权组合评价模型研究[J].管理评论,2012,05:170-176.
[16] 李珠瑞,马溪骏,彭张林.基于离差最大化的组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,01:174-179.
[17] 张发明.一种融合相似与差异特征的组合评价方法及应用[J].系统管理学报,2013,04:498-504.
[18] 曾宪报.关于组合评价法的事前事后检验[J].统计研究,1997,06:56-58.
[19] Breiman L, Friedman J H, Olshen R, et al. Classification and regression trees[J]. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 1984, 40(3): 582-588.
[20] 薛晖,郑中华,谢启伟.基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J].中国管理科学,2014,04:98-104.
[21] 李刚,程砚秋,董霖哲,王文君.基尼系数客观赋权方法研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(01):12-22.
[22] 谷炜,杜秀亭,卫李蓉.基于因子分析法的中国规模以上工业企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(01):84- 87.
[23] 罗洪云,张庆普.知识管理视角下新创科技型小企业突破性技术创新能力评价指标体系构建及测度[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(01):175-184.
[24] 杜丹丽,曾小春.速度特征视角的我国高新技术企业创新能力动态综合评价研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(07):44-53.
[25] 郭亚军,马赞福,张发明.组合评价方法的相对有效性分析及应用[J].中国管理科学,2009,02:125-130.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |