用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于变权重理论和TOPSIS法的采矿方法优选
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Optimization of Mining Method Based on Variable Weight Theory and TOPSIS
  • 作者:刘志祥 ; 刘进
  • 英文作者:LIU Zhixiang;LIU Jin;School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University;
  • 关键词:金属矿山 ; 海底开采 ; 采矿方法优选 ; 变权重理论 ; TOPSIS法
  • 英文关键词:metal mine;;seabed mining;;optimization of mining methods;;variable weight theory;;TOPSIS
  • 中文刊名:YOUS
  • 英文刊名:Nonferrous Metals Engineering
  • 机构:中南大学资源与安全工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:有色金属工程
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.9
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51674288)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YOUS201903013
  • 页数:7
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:10-1004/TF
  • 分类号:80-85+111
摘要
针对金属矿山复杂的开采技术条件,综合考虑经济、技术、安全因素,采用变权重理论和TOPSIS法,建立了采矿方法优选的基于变权重理论的TOPSIS多属性决策模型,其中利用变权重理论确定模型中各因素的权重,然后通过计算各采矿方法的综合优越度来综合评价各方案的优劣;并以三山岛金矿新立矿区海底开采为例,根据采矿方法选择原则,结合矿区开采实际情况,提出了六个具有代表性的方案,通过建立的决策模型对各方案进行了综合评判以选出最合适的采矿方案。研究结果表明:这六种方案的综合优越度分别为16.39%、70.87%、73.53%、83.78%、82.94%和73.50%,其中方案四和方案五的最高并且比较接近,结合新立矿区工程概况及开采技术条件,因而最终确定对于厚大矿体采用方案四,对于薄至中厚矿体则采用方案五开采,结果与工程实际相吻合,用这种方法选择出的采矿方法能最大程度实现安全、高效、低耗采矿的目的,同时表明该综合评判模型对采矿方式的优选具有一定的工程应用价值。
        For the complicated mining technology conditions of metal mine,a multi-attribute decision-making model,which takes into account the economic,technical and safety factor,based on variable weight theory and TOPSIS,is put forward to select a preferred mining method.The TOPSIS multi-attribute decision-making model based on variable weight theory is established,which uses variable weights.The theory determines the weight of each factor in the model,and then comprehensively evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme by calculating the comprehensive superiority of each mining method.Taking the seabed mining in Xinli mine area of Sanshandao Gold Mine as an example,six representative schemes are proposed according to the principle of the selection of mining method and actual situation of the mining area.Through the established decision-making model,the schemes are comprehensively evaluated to select the most suitable mining scheme.The results show that the comprehensive superior degrees of the six methods are 16.39%,70.87%,73.53%,83.78%,82.94% and73.50%,respectively,of which the fourth and the fifth scheme are the highest and relatively close to each other.It is eventually determined that the the fourth scheme should be adopted for the mining of thick and large orebodies,and the fifth scheme should be for thin to medium-thick orebodies according to the actual situation.The conclusion coincides with the engineering practice,and the mining method selected by this method can achieve the purpose of safety,high efficiency and low consumption mining to the greatest extent,and it also shows that comprehensive evaluation model has a certain engineering guidance for the optimization selection of mining methods.
引文
[1]BITARAFAN M K, ATAEI M. Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools[J].Journal-SouthAfricanInstituteofMiningand Metallurgy,2004,104(9):493-498.
    [2]刘华生,王洪海.层次分析在采矿方法选择中的应用[J].有色金属,1991,43(3):17-21.LIU Huasheng, WANG Honghai. Application of hierarchy analysis in selecting mining program[J].Nonferrous Metals Engineering,1991,43(3):17-21.
    [3]张海波,宋卫东,许英霞.基于灰色系统理论的高效采矿方法优选[J].黄金,2010,31(12):28-31.ZHANG Haibo,SONG Weidong,XU Yingxia.Optimal selection of efficient mining method based on the theory of grey system[J].Gold,2010,31(12):28-31.
    [4]史太禄,任凤玉,李文增,等.模糊数学在采矿方法优选中的应用[J].金属矿山,2007,37(11):29-31.SHI Tailu, REN Fengyu, LI Wenzeng, et al.Application of fuzzy mathematics in optimal choice of mining method[J].Metal Mine,2007,37(11):29-31.
    [5]陈建宏,刘浪,周智勇,等.基于主成分分析与神经网络的采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,41(5):1967-1972.CHEN Jianhong,LIU Lang,ZHOU Zhiyong,et al.Optimization of mining methods based on combination of principal component analysis and neural networks[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2010,41(5):1967-1972.
    [6]王剑波,兰明,刘志祥.基于组合赋权-理想点法的顶底柱开采方案优选研究[J].黄金科学技术,2015,23(3):55-59.WANG Jianbo,LAN Ming,LIU Zhixiang.Research on Exploiting scheme choice of roof and bottom pillars based on empowerment Combination and Ideal Point Method[J].Gold Science and Technology,2015,23(3):55-59.
    [7]汪培庄.模糊集与随机集落影[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985:93-102.WANG Peizhuang.Fuzzy sets and random colony shadow[M].Beijing:Beijing Normal University Press,1985:93-102.
    [8]李洪兴.因素空间理论与知识表示的数学框架(ⅤⅢ)—变权综合原理[J].模糊系统与数学,1995(3):1-9.LI Hongxing.Factor space theory and knowledge representation of mathematical framework(ⅤⅢ):variable weight synthesis[J].Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics,1995,9(3):1-9.
    [9]游克思,孙璐,顾文钧.变权综合评价法在山区道路安全评价中应用[J].系统工程,2010(5):85-88.YOU Kesi,SUN Lu,GU Wenjun.Variable weight comprehensive evaluation method in the evaluation of road safety in the mountains[J].Systems Engineering,2010,28(5):85-88.
    [10]李德清,李洪兴.状态变权向量的性质与构造[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):455-461.LI Deqing,LI Hongxing.The nature and structure of the state variable weights vector[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University(Science and Technology Edition),2002,8(4):455-461.
    [11]张锦春,裘杭萍,权冀川.变权评估中均衡函数的构造[J].火力与指挥控制,2007,32(7):107-110.ZHANG Jinchun,QIU Hangping, QUAN Jichuan.The construction of balance function in variable weight evaluation[J].Fire Control and Command Control,2007,32(7):108-110.
    [12]李德清,崔红梅,李洪兴.基于层次变权的多因素决策[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(3):258-263.LI Deqing,CUI Hongmei,LI Hongxing.Multivariate decision based on hierarchical variable weights[J].Systems Engineering,2004,19(3):258-263.
    [13]刘文奇.均衡函数及其在变权综合中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(4):59-65.LIU Wenqi.Balancing function and its application in variable weights theory[J].Systems Engineering Theory and Practice,1997,17(4):58-64.
    [14]Hwang C L,Yoon K,et al.Multiple Attribute Decision Making[J]. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems,1981,4(4):287-288.
    [15]徐玖平,吴巍.多属性决策的理论与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006:72-83.XU Jiuping, WU Wei. Multiple attribute decision making theory and methods[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2006:72-83.
    [16]胡国宏,李夕兵,刘志祥.基于层次分析和灰色理论的海底采矿方法选择[J].金属矿山,2009,39(10):26-31.Hu Guohong, Li Xibing, Liu Zhixiang.Under-sea mining method selection based on analytic hierarchy process and gray theory[J].Metal Mine,2009,39(10):26-31.
    [17]王新民,李天正,陈秋松,等.基于变权重理论和TOPSIS的充填方式优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016(1):198-203.WANG Xinmin,LI Tianzheng,CHEN Qiusong,et al.Filling way optimization based on variable weight theory and TOPSIS[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2016(1):198-203.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700