用户名: 密码: 验证码:
万州城区空气污染过程中含碳气溶胶的变化特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols during air pollution episodes in the urban Wanzhou area
  • 作者:黄怡民 ; 张六一 ; 刘源 ; 王欢博 ; 彭超 ; 龙娟 ; 杨复沫
  • 英文作者:HUANG Yimin;ZHANG;Liuyi;LIU Yuan;WANG Huanbo;PENG Chao;LONG Juan;YANG Fumo;Key Laboratory of Water Environment Evolution and Pollution Control in Three Gorges Reservoir,Chongqing Three Gorges University;Key Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment,Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:PM_(2.5) ; 空气污染过程 ; 有机碳 ; 元素碳 ; 二次有机碳
  • 英文关键词:PM2.5;;air pollution episode;;organic carbon;;elemental carbon;;secondary organic carbon
  • 中文刊名:HJWR
  • 英文刊名:Environmental Pollution & Control
  • 机构:重庆三峡学院三峡库区水环境演变与污染防治重点实验室;中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院水库水环境重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:环境污染与防治
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41;No.317
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41375123);; 重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(No.cstc2018jcyjAX0236);; 重庆市教育委员会科技项目(No.KJ1501001、No.KJ1501006);; 重庆市万州区科技计划项目(No.201503049);; 重庆三峡学院2018年校级高等教育教学改革研究项目(No.JGQN1814)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HJWR201904015
  • 页数:7
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:33-1084/X
  • 分类号:72-78
摘要
于2016年9月28日至10月15日在万州城区对气态污染物、颗粒物及其含碳气溶胶进行了在线连续观测,结合气象参数,分析了含碳气溶胶的污染特征。结果表明,此次持续污染过程主要由颗粒物污染造成,污染天PM_(10)和PM_(2.5)平均质量浓度分别为170.8、123.7μg/m~3,显著高于非污染天。污染天和非污染天PM_(2.5)、NO_x、有机碳(OC)及元素碳(EC)浓度的日变化都呈双峰,但污染天PM_(2.5)、NO_x和OC出现早峰值时间比非污染天推迟1~3h。污染天OC、EC的平均质量浓度分别为28.0、5.4μg/m~3,分别为非污染天的2.2、1.6倍。以非污染天的起始点作为参照点,得到污染天OC、EC的平均增长率分别为159.3%和73.0%,OC污染累积和二次转化贡献率分别为45.8%和54.2%,说明污染过程OC以二次转化为主。并用最小比值法估算了二次有机碳(SOC)含量,得到污染天和非污染天PM_(2.5)中SOC平均质量浓度分别为16.3、5.3μg/m~3,SOC在OC中的占比(以质量分数计)分别为56.1%和39.9%,污染天SOC占比增加,也证明污染过程OC以二次转化为主。污染天静风出现频率比非污染天高,在东南风的影响下,OC、EC易出现高浓度。
        Continuous measurements of gas pollutants,particulates and carbonaceous aerosols contained were conducted to assess the characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols during a typical air pollution event in the urban Wanzhou from September 28th to October 15th,2016.The results showed that,this continuous pollution process was mainly caused by particulate pollution.The average concentrations of PM_(10) and PM_(2.5) during polluted days were 170.8 and 123.7μg/m~3,respectively,higher than those during non-polluted days.The diurnal variations of PM_(2.5),NO_x,organic carbon(OC)and elemental carbon(EC)showed significantly bimodal pattern in both polluted days and nonpolluted days.However,the morning peak times of PM_(2.5),NO_x,and OC concentrations were delayed by about one to three hours during the polluted days.The average OC and EC concentrations were 28.0 and 5.4μg/m~3 during polluted days,which were 2.2 and 1.6 times of non-polluted days,respectively.Compared to the reference point(the first day of non-polluted day),the average growth rates of OC and EC were 159.3% and 73.0% during polluted days.It was estimated the secondary formation was more important than the accumulation process for the increase of OC during polluted days,which accounting for 54.2% and 45.8%,respectively.The secondary organic carbon(SOC)concentrations were estimated by the minimum OC/EC,and the concentrations of SOC during polluted days and nonpolluted days were 16.3 and 5.3μg/m~3,accounting for 56.1% and 39.9% to OC,respectively,also verifying the secondary formation source.Higher static wind ratio appeared during polluted days and OC and EC concentrations were generally higher under southeastern conditions.
引文
[1]LIM H J,TURPIN B J.Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta:results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta supersite experiment[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2002,36(21):4489-4496.
    [2]SEGUEL A R,MORALES S R G E,LEIVA G M A.Estimations of primary and secondary organic carbon formation in PM2.5aerosols of Santiago City,Chile[J].Atmospheric Environment,2009,43(13):2125-2131.
    [3]CAO J J,LEE S C,HO K F,et al.Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region,China[J].Atmospheric Environment,2004,38(27):4447-4456.
    [4]BATMUNKH T,KIM Y J,LEE K Y,et al.Time-resolved measurements of PM2.5carbonaceous aerosols at Gosan,Korea[J].Journal of the Air&Waste Management Association,2014,61(11):1174-1182.
    [5]MOORE K F,NING Z,NTZIACHRISTOS L,et al.Daily variation in the properties of urban ultrafine aerosol-Part I:physical characterization and volatility[J].Atmospheric Environment,2007,41(38):8633-8646.
    [6]ALVES,PIO C A,CASIMIRO A.Secondary organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols:speciation and formation mechanisms[J].Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society,2005,16(5):1017-1029.
    [7]谢绍东,于淼,姜明.有机气溶胶的来源与形成研究现状[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(12):1933-1939.
    [8]于建华,虞统,杨晓光,等.北京冬季PM2.5中元素碳、有机碳的污染特征[J].环境科学研究,2004,17(1):48-50.
    [9]PATHAK R K,WANG T,HO K F,et al.Characteristics of summertime PM2.5organic and elemental carbon in four major Chinese cities:implications of high acidity for water-soluble organic carbon(WSOC)[J].Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(2):318-325.
    [10]JACOBSON M Z.Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols[J].Nature,2001,409(6821):695-697.
    [11]ZHANG R J,CAO J J,LEE S C,et al.Carbonaceous aerosols in PM10and pollution gases in winter in Beijing[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2007,19(5):564-571.
    [12]MAUDERLY J L,CHOW J C.Health effects of organic aerosols[J].Inhalation Toxicology,2008,20(3):257-288.
    [13]HAND J L,SCHICHTEL B A,MALM W C,et al.Spatial and temporal trends in PM2.5organic and elemental carbon across the United States[J].Advances in Meteorology,2013,2013:367674.
    [14]PARASKEVOPOULOU D,LIAKAKOU E,GERASOPOU-LOS E,et al.Long-term characterization of organic and elemental carbon in the PM2.5 fraction:the case of Athens,Greece[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2014,14(23):13313-13325.
    [15]LIN P,HU M,DENG Z,et al.Seasonal and diurnal variations of organic carbon in PM2.5in Beijing and the estimation of secondary organic carbon[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2009,114(D2):1-14.
    [16]FENG Y L,CHEN Y J,GUO H,et al.Characteristics of organic and elemental carbon in PM2.5 samples in Shanghai,China[J].Atmospheric Research,2009,92(4):434-442.
    [17]CAO J J,WU F,CHOW J C,et al.Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003in Xi’an,China[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2005,5(11):3127-3137.
    [18]YANG F,TAN J,ZHAO Q,et al.Characteristics of PM2.5speciation in representative megacities and across China[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2011,11(11):5207-5219.
    [19]陈刚才,陶俊,赵琦,等.重庆主城区大气总悬浮颗粒中有机碳和元素碳污染特征分析[J].重庆环境科学,2003,25(10):1-4.
    [20]李礼,余家燕.重庆城区空气中有机碳和元素碳浓度水平的监测分析[J].重庆环境科学,2012,34(2):41-43.
    [21]张灿,周志恩,翟崇治,等.基于重庆本地碳成分谱的PM2.5碳组分来源分析[J].环境科学,2014,35(3):810-819.
    [22]赵亮,鲁群岷,李莉,等.重庆万州区大气降水的化学特征[J].重庆环境科学,2013,35(2):9-15.
    [23]彭超,翟崇治,王欢博,等.万州城区夏季、冬季PM2.5中有机碳和元素碳的浓度特征[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(6):1638-1644.
    [24]周敏,陈长虹,王红丽,等.上海秋季典型大气高污染过程中有机碳和元素碳的变化特征[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(1).
    [25]云龙龙,陆钒,张天舒,等.无锡市冬季典型天气PM2.5中碳组分的污染特征[J].环境科学,2014,35(9):3280-3286.
    [26]APPEL B R,COLODNY P.Analysis of carbonaceous materials in Southern California atmospheric aerosols[J].Environmental Science&Techology,1976,10(4):359-363.
    [27]CHOW J C,WATSON J G,LU Z,et al.Descriptive analysis of PM2.5and PM10at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX[J].Atmosperic Environment,1996,30(12):2079-2112.
    [28]CASTRO L M,PIO C A,HARRISON R M,et al.Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres:estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations[J].Atmosperic Environment,1999,33(17):2771-2781.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700