英文发表系统评价再评价研究主题分析
|
摘要
目的:分析英文发表系统评价再评价的研究主题。方法:检索PubMed,Embase.com和Cochrane Library,检索时间截至2019年1月。由2位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选出系统评价再评价研究,用BICOMS 2分析软件对主要主题词进行抽取和整理并生成共现矩阵,分别利用NetDraw 2.089和gCLUTO 1.0软件绘制网络关系图和进行聚类分析。结果:纳入1 025篇系统评价再评价的研究,具有实质意义主要主题词1 008个,核心主题词为文献综述、循证医学、Meta分析、肿瘤和锻炼。聚类分析共获得5个研究主题,分别为:主题1:针刺和物理治疗方法在痴呆和疼痛管理中的价值;主题2:循证医学研究方法在精神分裂症和精神障碍结果评估中的应用;主题3:远程医疗在糖尿病和哮喘等慢性疾病患者自我照顾和教育中的价值;主题4:初级卫生保健在发展中国家肿瘤,2型糖尿病和心血管疾病等患者健康状况改善方面的价值;主题5:饮食和锻炼等行为治疗在肥胖和HIV感染中的价值。结论:目前关于系统评价再评价的研究主要集中在远程医疗和补充替代治疗在慢病防治中的价值方面。
Objective:To analyze the research topic of overview of systematic reviews(OoSRs) in English.Methods:The Pub Med,Embase.com,Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2019,to include the English researches on OoSRs.Two researchers independently selected the papers of OoSRs by inclusion and exclusion criteria,and extracted the major medical subject headings(MeSH) and produced matrix by BICOMS 2 software,the figure of network by Net Draw 2.089,cluster analysis by g CLUTO 1.0.Results:A total of 1 025 OoSRs involving 1 008 major MeSH with substantial meanings were included.The five major MeSH were Review Literature as Topic,Evidence-Based Medicine,Meta-Analysis as Topic,Neoplasms,and Exercise.The MeSH were divided into 5 research topics,research topic one:the value of acupuncture and physical therapy for dementia and pain management.Research topic two:the research method of evidence-based medical for outcome assessment of schizophrenia and mental disorders.Research topic three:the value of telemedicine for patient's self-care and education of diabetes and asthma.Research topic four:primary health care for improving the health status of tumor,cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes patients in developing countries.Research topic five:the value of diet and exercise therapy for obesity and HIV infection.Conclusion:The OoSRs focus on the aspects of telemedicine and complementary therapies for chronic diseases.
Objective:To analyze the research topic of overview of systematic reviews(OoSRs) in English.Methods:The Pub Med,Embase.com,Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2019,to include the English researches on OoSRs.Two researchers independently selected the papers of OoSRs by inclusion and exclusion criteria,and extracted the major medical subject headings(MeSH) and produced matrix by BICOMS 2 software,the figure of network by Net Draw 2.089,cluster analysis by g CLUTO 1.0.Results:A total of 1 025 OoSRs involving 1 008 major MeSH with substantial meanings were included.The five major MeSH were Review Literature as Topic,Evidence-Based Medicine,Meta-Analysis as Topic,Neoplasms,and Exercise.The MeSH were divided into 5 research topics,research topic one:the value of acupuncture and physical therapy for dementia and pain management.Research topic two:the research method of evidence-based medical for outcome assessment of schizophrenia and mental disorders.Research topic three:the value of telemedicine for patient's self-care and education of diabetes and asthma.Research topic four:primary health care for improving the health status of tumor,cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes patients in developing countries.Research topic five:the value of diet and exercise therapy for obesity and HIV infection.Conclusion:The OoSRs focus on the aspects of telemedicine and complementary therapies for chronic diseases.
引文
[1]Hunt H,Pollock A,Campbell P,et al.An introduction to overviews of reviews:planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview[J].Syst Rev,2018,7(1):39.
[2]Bougioukas KI,Bouras E,Apostolidou-Kiouti F,et al.Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2019,106:70-79.
[3]Bougioukas KI,Liakos A,Tsapas A,et al.Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist:a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2018,93:9-24.
[4]Ranson MK,Evans DB.Taking health systems research syntheses to the next level:overviews of systematic reviews[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017,9:ED000123.
[5]Thomson D.Evidence synthesis in child health:overviews of reviews[J].Evid Based Child Health,2014,9(1):1-2
[6]王虎城,杨丰文,胡海殷,等.基于PRIO-harms的中医药系统评价再评价报告规范研究[J].中医杂志,2018,59(23):2000-2005.
[7]卢存存,杨丰文,柯立鑫,等.系统评价再评价优先报告条目解读[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2018,13(3):236-240.
[8]刘雅莉,袁金秋,杨克虎,等.系统评价再评价的制作方法简介及相关资料分析[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2011,6(1):58-64.
[9]李江,唐威,王昕,等.乳腺癌筛查领域的系统评价再评价[J].中国肿瘤,2018,27(6):401-408.
[10]令娟,张定华,窦莹环,等.DPP-4抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价再评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(2):208-215.
[11]张永刚,王东光,郑琳莉,等.呼吸喹诺酮治疗社区获得性肺炎的系统评价再评价[J].华西医学,2018,33(1):47-52.
[12]施树珍,蔡润津,苟铃珠,等.国外医学领域专家系统的研究主题与研究者合作能力分析[J].中国医药导刊,2018,20(08):488-493.
[13]陈吉,孙月,布优祥,等.中医领域真实世界研究现状分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(11):1216-1223.
[14]施树珍,葛龙,李伦,等.Scoping Review研究主题分析[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(5):325-328.
[15]刘爱萍,王稼祥,李沐阳,等.壮医药研究主题与作者及其机构合作能力分析[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(4):241-245.
[2]Bougioukas KI,Bouras E,Apostolidou-Kiouti F,et al.Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2019,106:70-79.
[3]Bougioukas KI,Liakos A,Tsapas A,et al.Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist:a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2018,93:9-24.
[4]Ranson MK,Evans DB.Taking health systems research syntheses to the next level:overviews of systematic reviews[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017,9:ED000123.
[5]Thomson D.Evidence synthesis in child health:overviews of reviews[J].Evid Based Child Health,2014,9(1):1-2
[6]王虎城,杨丰文,胡海殷,等.基于PRIO-harms的中医药系统评价再评价报告规范研究[J].中医杂志,2018,59(23):2000-2005.
[7]卢存存,杨丰文,柯立鑫,等.系统评价再评价优先报告条目解读[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2018,13(3):236-240.
[8]刘雅莉,袁金秋,杨克虎,等.系统评价再评价的制作方法简介及相关资料分析[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2011,6(1):58-64.
[9]李江,唐威,王昕,等.乳腺癌筛查领域的系统评价再评价[J].中国肿瘤,2018,27(6):401-408.
[10]令娟,张定华,窦莹环,等.DPP-4抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价再评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(2):208-215.
[11]张永刚,王东光,郑琳莉,等.呼吸喹诺酮治疗社区获得性肺炎的系统评价再评价[J].华西医学,2018,33(1):47-52.
[12]施树珍,蔡润津,苟铃珠,等.国外医学领域专家系统的研究主题与研究者合作能力分析[J].中国医药导刊,2018,20(08):488-493.
[13]陈吉,孙月,布优祥,等.中医领域真实世界研究现状分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(11):1216-1223.
[14]施树珍,葛龙,李伦,等.Scoping Review研究主题分析[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(5):325-328.
[15]刘爱萍,王稼祥,李沐阳,等.壮医药研究主题与作者及其机构合作能力分析[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(4):241-245.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |