北方农牧交错生态脆弱区农户生态足迹及其与收入的关系

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Ecological Footprint of Rural Households and Its Relations with Income in Agro-Pastoral Ecologically-Vulnerable Areas in North China 作者：刘海燕 ; 郝海广 ; 刘煜杰 ; 勾蒙蒙 ; 张哲 英文作者：LIU Haiyan;HAO Haiguang;LIU Yujie;GOU Mengmeng;ZHANG Zhe;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences; 关键词：农户 ; 生产和消费 ; 生态足迹 ; 收入 ; 农牧交错生态脆弱区 英文关键词：rural households;;production and consumption;;ecological footprint;;income;;agro-pastoral ecologically-vulnerable areas 中文刊名：STJJ 英文刊名：Ecological Economy 机构：中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室; 出版日期：2019-07-01 出版单位：生态经济 年：2019 期：v.35;No.343 基金：国家自然科学基金项目“北方农牧交错生态脆弱区农户生计分化对农地利用的驱动机制研究”(41501095);国家自然科学基金项目“泾河流域生态保护政策驱动下的生态系统服务流研究”(41701601) 语种：中文; 页：STJJ201907028 页数：7 CN：07 ISSN：53-1193/F 分类号：152-158

摘要

研究人类生产消费与生态环境之间的影响已经成为当前的热点科学问题。文章通过调查内蒙古太仆寺旗、多伦县和正镶白旗农户住户基本情况,以生产和消费为基础计算了农户生态足迹,并进一步分析了农户生态足迹的构成、动态变化及其与收入之间的关系。研究结果表明:农户生产足迹远高于消费足迹,农户从生态系统获取的产品主要向外部输出。耕地消费足迹与草地生产足迹分别在消费足迹和生产足迹中占较大比重,并有上升趋势,但随着草地消费足迹和耕地生产足迹显著下降导致农户的消费足迹和生产足迹均有所下降。农户生态足迹,尤其是草地生产足迹和草地消费足迹与收入水平具有显著正相关关系,非农就业收入占比高的农户生态足迹总体较小。为了保护农牧交错生态脆弱区的生态系统,需要进一步完善生态补偿机制,改变农户粗放化的畜牧业生产方式,持续推进农户非农就业。
        The impact of human production and consumption on ecosystem is always at the center of academic attention. We did the rural household survey in Taibus Banner, Duolun County, and Zhengxiangbai Banner in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and calculated the ecological footprint based on production and consumption. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship of the composition and dynamic change of ecological footprint with income of farming household The findings suggest that: the total consumption ecological footprint(CEF) is higher than the total production ecological footprint(PEF), which indicates that most of products obtained from local ecosystems are supplied to out of the areas. Arable land consumption footprint(ACEF) occupies a larger proportion in the CEF, while grassland production footprint(GPEF) occupies a larger proportion in PEF, and both of the proportions were rising up. However, the reduction of grassland consumption footprint(GCEF) and arable land production footprint(APEF) lead to the reduction of CEF and PEF. Ecological footprint(EF)especially GCEF and GPEF have a significant positive correlation with income. Households with higher proportion of income obtained from non-farm employment have a smaller ecological footprint. In order to protect the ecosystem in agro-pastoral ecologically-vulnerable areas, it's necessary to further improve the ecological compensation mechanism, change the extensive production mode of livestock breeding, and consistently promote the non-farm employment.

引文

[1]甄霖,刘雪林,李芬,等.脆弱生态区生态系统服务消费与生态补偿研究:进展与挑战[J].资源科学,2010(5):797-803.
    [2]王成超,杨玉盛.基于农户生计演化的山地生态恢复研究综述[J].自然资源学报,2011(2):344-352.
    [3]赵雪雁,毛笑文.汉、藏、回族地区农户的环境影响--以甘肃省张掖市、甘南藏族自治州、临夏回族自治州为例[J].生态学报,2013(17):5397-5406.
    [4]Wackernagel M,Rees W E.Our ecological footprint:Reducing human impact on the earth[M].Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers,1996.
    [5]WWF,GFN,ZSL.Living planet report 2012:Biodiversity biocapacity and better choices[EB/OL].(2012-05-01).https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/3779579969611/living_planet_report_2012.pdf.
    [6]徐中民,张志强,程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000(5):607-616.
    [7]Liu D,Feng Z M,Yang Y Z,et al.Spatial patterns of ecological carrying capacity supply-demand balance in China at county level[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2011,21(5):833-844.
    [8]Chen D D,Gao W S,Chen Y Q,et al.Ecological footprint analysis of food consumption of rural residents in China in the latest 30 years[J].Agriculture&Agricultural Science Procedia2010,1(1):106-115.
    [9]谭伟文,文礼章,仝宝生,等.生态足迹理论综述与应用展望[J].生态经济,2012(6):173-181.
    [10]Monfreda C,Wackernagel M,Deumling D.Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments[J].Land Use Policy,2004,21(3):231-246.
    [11]黄雨生,曲建升,刘莉娜.中国各省份碳足迹与碳承载力差异研究[J].生态经济,2016(6):38-43.
    [12]张玉波,王梦君,李俊清,等.生态补偿对大熊猫栖息地周边农户生态足迹的影响[J].生态学报,2009(7):3569-3575.
    [13]侯彩霞,赵雪雁,文岩,等.不同生计方式农户的碳足迹研究--以黑河流域中游张掖市为例[J].自然资源学报,2014(4):587-597.
    [14]王宏卫,安秀峰,塔西甫拉提·特依拜,等.基于乡镇尺度的克里雅河绿洲生态承载力分析--以于田县13个乡镇生态承载力为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015(10):48-55.
    [15]尚海洋,马忠,焦文献,等.甘肃省城镇不同收入水平群体家庭生态足迹计算[J].自然资源学报,2006(3):408-416.
    [16]王录仓,高静.高寒牧区村域生态足迹--以甘南州合作市为例[J].生态学报,2012(12):3795-3805.
    [17]周晔,项文化.广西沙田镇农村农户生态足迹及其影响因子分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011(5):234-240.
    [18]陈文辉,谢高地,张昌顺,等.北京市消耗食物生态足迹距离[J].生态学报,2016(4):904-914.
    [19]杨振.农户收入差异对生活用能及生态环境的影响--以江汉平原为例[J].生态学报,2011(1):239-246.
    [20]Li S J,Sun Z G,Tan M H,et al.Effects of rural-urban migration on vegetation greenness in fragile areas:A case study of Inner Mongolia in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,201626(3):313-324.
    [21]刘燕华,李秀彬.脆弱生态环境与可持续发展[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
    [22]中华人民共和国国务院.全国主体功能区规划[EB/OL].(2018-11-11).https://max.book118.com/html/2018/0518/167050277shtm.
    [23]环境保护部.全国生态脆弱区保护规划纲要[EB/OL].(2008-09-27).http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2008-10/09/content_1116192htm.