青海森林认证调查分析
|
摘要
青海省森林认证调查结果,运用图表对比的方式进行分析。通过对青海森林认证能力建设及宣传培训、参与单位对森林认证的认知情况、森林经营认证的动力及效益、森林认证的基础条件及认知方向分析,得出:参与调查的单位对森林认证认知的差异较大,其中科研机构的认知度最高为100%,林业站的认知度最低为31%;森林认证项目的实施对于企业来说利大于弊,动力机制的研究是能否实施森林认证项目的重要因素。
The results of the forest certification survey in Qinghai Province were analyzed by means of chart comparison. Through the analysis of Qinghai forest certification capacity building and publicity training,the recognition of forest certification by participating units,the motivation and benefit of forest management certification,the basic conditions of forest certification and the cognitive direction,it is concluded that the units participating in the survey have certified the forest. The differences in cognition are large,in which the recognition of scientific research institutions is 100%,and the awareness of forestry stations is at least 31%. The implementation of forest certification projects is more beneficial than the disadvantages of enterprises. Important factors in implementing a forest certification program.
The results of the forest certification survey in Qinghai Province were analyzed by means of chart comparison. Through the analysis of Qinghai forest certification capacity building and publicity training,the recognition of forest certification by participating units,the motivation and benefit of forest management certification,the basic conditions of forest certification and the cognitive direction,it is concluded that the units participating in the survey have certified the forest. The differences in cognition are large,in which the recognition of scientific research institutions is 100%,and the awareness of forestry stations is at least 31%. The implementation of forest certification projects is more beneficial than the disadvantages of enterprises. Important factors in implementing a forest certification program.
引文
[1]贺爱珍.浅谈山西省森林认证[J].山西林业科技,2012,41(4):49-51.
[2]白彤,王志平,高鸿江,崔红.加入WTO后森林认证工作势在必行[J].内蒙古林业科技,2001,(S1):100-109.
[3]吕勇,安里练雄.森林认证现状与发展趋势[J].中南林学院学报,2004,(1):78-82.
[4]田明华,刘智丹,王富炜,王铭子,柴梅,等.森林认证标识认知影响因素的实证分析---基于北京市488名消费者的调查[J].林业经济问题,2016,(1):22-23.
[5]姚贵宝.FSC与ISO森林认证体系比较研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2003:66-70.
[6]陈洁,徐斌,崔玉倩.CFCC森林经营认证综合效益调查分析[J].林业资源管理,2015,(3):63-65.
[7]黄晓玲,杨建州,谢志忠.森林认证制度的研究进展综述-兼论林业企业实施森林认证动力机制研究的必要性[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(16):106-111.
[8]K.Sugiura,M.Yamamoto,Y.Yoshitani,K.Tanimoto,A.Daigo,T.Murakami.Performance diagnostics of PEFC by current-pulse method[J].Journal of Power Sources,2006,157(2):42-44.
[9]张三民.青海油田两产品获美国石油学会认证[N].青海日报,2010-09-01(002).
[10]何茂军.“青海青”沙棘油获国家保健食品认证[N].青海日报,2010-12-18(001).
[11]王亚明,于玲,韩菲.关于中国开展森林认证的几点建议[J].林业经济,2011,(4):36-39.
[12]徐斌,陈绍志,付博.中国林业企业开展森林经营认证的动力与经济效益分析[J].林业经济问题,2014,34(1):78-83.
[2]白彤,王志平,高鸿江,崔红.加入WTO后森林认证工作势在必行[J].内蒙古林业科技,2001,(S1):100-109.
[3]吕勇,安里练雄.森林认证现状与发展趋势[J].中南林学院学报,2004,(1):78-82.
[4]田明华,刘智丹,王富炜,王铭子,柴梅,等.森林认证标识认知影响因素的实证分析---基于北京市488名消费者的调查[J].林业经济问题,2016,(1):22-23.
[5]姚贵宝.FSC与ISO森林认证体系比较研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2003:66-70.
[6]陈洁,徐斌,崔玉倩.CFCC森林经营认证综合效益调查分析[J].林业资源管理,2015,(3):63-65.
[7]黄晓玲,杨建州,谢志忠.森林认证制度的研究进展综述-兼论林业企业实施森林认证动力机制研究的必要性[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(16):106-111.
[8]K.Sugiura,M.Yamamoto,Y.Yoshitani,K.Tanimoto,A.Daigo,T.Murakami.Performance diagnostics of PEFC by current-pulse method[J].Journal of Power Sources,2006,157(2):42-44.
[9]张三民.青海油田两产品获美国石油学会认证[N].青海日报,2010-09-01(002).
[10]何茂军.“青海青”沙棘油获国家保健食品认证[N].青海日报,2010-12-18(001).
[11]王亚明,于玲,韩菲.关于中国开展森林认证的几点建议[J].林业经济,2011,(4):36-39.
[12]徐斌,陈绍志,付博.中国林业企业开展森林经营认证的动力与经济效益分析[J].林业经济问题,2014,34(1):78-83.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |