雄安新区与京津冀协同发展的实践逻辑与运行模式——基于协同学理论的分析框架
|
摘要
雄安新区与京津冀的协同发展直接关乎北京非首都功能疏解与深化京津冀协同目标的实现。目前,在协同发展过程中存在着内外部因素、共享因素以及隐形因素的掣肘,突出表现为雄安新区发展基础的滞后性、京津城市的虹吸效应与京津冀协同发展的高落差、顶层设计的推进与落实缓慢以及区域内城市主体定位的不明确、发展目标的偏差与机制的不完善等问题。基于协同学理论,雄安新区与京津冀的协同发展应谋求多元、系统的运行模式。具体来说,加强协同的顶层设计是基础,有序推进协同发展的交通圈、产业圈、智慧城市圈、环境治理圈是关键,政府引导与市场调节功能的发挥是催化剂,完善沟通反馈机制、利益协调机制与联合监督考核机制是保障。
The Synergy development of Xiong'an New Area and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region is directly related to the realization of Beijing's non-capital function and the deepening of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region synergy goal. At present,there are restrictions of internal and external factors,sharing factors and invisible factors which are mainly manifested in the lag of the development foundation of Xiong'an New Area,the siphon effect of Beijing-T ianjin City and the high drop among synergy development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region,Based on the synergetic theory,the synergy development of Xiong'an New Area and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region should seek a diversified and systematic operation mode. Specifically, strengthening the top-level design of synergy is the foundation,the orderly promotion of the synergy development of the traffic circle,industrial circle,smart city circle and environmental governance circle is the key,the play of government guidance function and market adjustment function is a catalyst, the perfect of communication feedback mechanism,interest coordination mechanism and joint supervision assessment mechanisms is the guarantees of the operational mode.
The Synergy development of Xiong'an New Area and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region is directly related to the realization of Beijing's non-capital function and the deepening of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region synergy goal. At present,there are restrictions of internal and external factors,sharing factors and invisible factors which are mainly manifested in the lag of the development foundation of Xiong'an New Area,the siphon effect of Beijing-T ianjin City and the high drop among synergy development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region,Based on the synergetic theory,the synergy development of Xiong'an New Area and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region should seek a diversified and systematic operation mode. Specifically, strengthening the top-level design of synergy is the foundation,the orderly promotion of the synergy development of the traffic circle,industrial circle,smart city circle and environmental governance circle is the key,the play of government guidance function and market adjustment function is a catalyst, the perfect of communication feedback mechanism,interest coordination mechanism and joint supervision assessment mechanisms is the guarantees of the operational mode.
引文
[1]习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[DB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm,2018-07-03.
[2]Cowell M.Polycentric Regions:Comparing Complementarity and Institutional Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area,the Randstad and Emilia-Romagna[J].Urban Studies,2010,(47).
[3]Alfaro-Gar cía V G,Gil-Lafuente A M,Calderón G G A.A Fuzzy Approach to a Municipality Grouping Model T owards Creation of Synergies[J].Computational&Mathematical Organization T heory,2016,(3).
[4]Danson M,Herrschel T.New Regions and Regionalisation Through Clusters[J].International Journal of Public Sector Management,2009,(3).
[5]Leeuwen E V.Urban-Rural Synergies:An Explorative Study at the NUTS3 Level[J].Applied Spatial Analysis&Policy,2015,(3).
[6]Φivind Strand,Leydesdorff L.Where is Synergy Indicated in the Norwegian Innovation System?Triple-Helix Relations Among T echnology,Organization,and Geography[J].T echnological Forecasting&Social Change,2013,(3).
[7]Yoon J,Han W P.Triple Helix Dynamics of South Korea’s Innovation System:a Network Analysis of Int er r egional T echnological Collabor at ions[J].Quality&Quantity,2017,(3).
[8]毛汉英.京津冀协同发展的机制创新与区域政策研究[J].地理科学进展,2017,(1).
[9]薄文广,陈飞.京津冀协同发展:挑战与困境[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(1).
[10]王浩,李新春,沈正平.城市群协同发展影响因素与动力机制研究——以淮海城市群为例[J].南京社会科学,2017,(5).
[11]郭园庚.雄安新区与京津冀协同创新共同体建设的互联共生[J].河北学刊,2018,(4).
[12]赵新峰,王浦劬.京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区治理理念的变革与重塑[J].行政论坛,2018,(2).
[13]司林波,吴振其.对雄安新区与周边地区协同发展的探讨[J].中国行政管理,2017,(12).
[14]叶振宇.雄安新区与京、津、冀的关系及合作途径[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(4).
[15][德]赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学:大自然构成的奥秘[M].凌复华.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
[16]司林波,等.政府生态绩效问责制的理论探讨——内涵、结构、功能与运行机制[J].生态经济,2017,(12).
[2]Cowell M.Polycentric Regions:Comparing Complementarity and Institutional Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area,the Randstad and Emilia-Romagna[J].Urban Studies,2010,(47).
[3]Alfaro-Gar cía V G,Gil-Lafuente A M,Calderón G G A.A Fuzzy Approach to a Municipality Grouping Model T owards Creation of Synergies[J].Computational&Mathematical Organization T heory,2016,(3).
[4]Danson M,Herrschel T.New Regions and Regionalisation Through Clusters[J].International Journal of Public Sector Management,2009,(3).
[5]Leeuwen E V.Urban-Rural Synergies:An Explorative Study at the NUTS3 Level[J].Applied Spatial Analysis&Policy,2015,(3).
[6]Φivind Strand,Leydesdorff L.Where is Synergy Indicated in the Norwegian Innovation System?Triple-Helix Relations Among T echnology,Organization,and Geography[J].T echnological Forecasting&Social Change,2013,(3).
[7]Yoon J,Han W P.Triple Helix Dynamics of South Korea’s Innovation System:a Network Analysis of Int er r egional T echnological Collabor at ions[J].Quality&Quantity,2017,(3).
[8]毛汉英.京津冀协同发展的机制创新与区域政策研究[J].地理科学进展,2017,(1).
[9]薄文广,陈飞.京津冀协同发展:挑战与困境[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(1).
[10]王浩,李新春,沈正平.城市群协同发展影响因素与动力机制研究——以淮海城市群为例[J].南京社会科学,2017,(5).
[11]郭园庚.雄安新区与京津冀协同创新共同体建设的互联共生[J].河北学刊,2018,(4).
[12]赵新峰,王浦劬.京津冀协同发展背景下雄安新区治理理念的变革与重塑[J].行政论坛,2018,(2).
[13]司林波,吴振其.对雄安新区与周边地区协同发展的探讨[J].中国行政管理,2017,(12).
[14]叶振宇.雄安新区与京、津、冀的关系及合作途径[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(4).
[15][德]赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学:大自然构成的奥秘[M].凌复华.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
[16]司林波,等.政府生态绩效问责制的理论探讨——内涵、结构、功能与运行机制[J].生态经济,2017,(12).
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |