用户名: 密码: 验证码:
晋陕蒙能源区不同构型土体水分入渗特性模拟
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
采用一维垂直积水入渗试验,研究晋陕蒙能源区不同构型土体的水分入渗特性。结果表明:不同构型土体的入渗能力差异明显,表现为风沙土、黄土、砒砂岩的入渗能力依次降低,风沙土和黄土中采用混合添加和分层添加砒砂岩的方式均可以延长入渗时间并能降低入渗速率;在控制较高容重的条件下,含有料姜石和煤矸石的土体入渗能力低;层状结构土体的入渗能力低于均质土壤;采用线性函数可以很好地描述不同构型土体累积入渗量与湿润锋推进距离之间的关系;与Philip模型相比,Kostiakov入渗模型可以更好地拟合不同构型土体的入渗过程。
The soil infiltration characteristic is one of the most important soil physical properties.The structure and texture of the configuration soils in Shanxi,Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia energy region area are quite complex and results in different infiltration properties.In this study,the infiltration characteristics of different configuration soil were analyzed by one-dimensional vertical infiltration experiment.The results showed that soil infiltration characteristics were strong influenced by soil configuration,and the infiltration capacity decreased as aeolian sandy soil,loess soil and soft rock.The mixed adding and layered adding soft rock to aeolian sandy soil and loess soil both could extend infiltration time and reduce infiltration rate.The infiltration process of soil containing calcites and gangue was inhibited in the high bulk density condition.Layered structure soil had a lower infiltration capacity than homogeneous soil.The relationship between cumulative infiltration and wetting front advancing distance could be well expressed as a linear function model.Kostiakov infiltration model could better fit the infiltration process with different configurations(R~2>0.93) than Philip model.These results provide experimental evidence for soil water movement process and technical support for the reconstruction and reclamation of mining soils in Shanxi,Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia energy region area.
引文
[1]汪应宏,郭达志,张海荣,等.我国煤炭资源势的空间分布及其应用[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):225-230.
    [2]Keskin T,Makineci E.Some soil properties on coal mine spoils reclaimed with black locust(Robinia pceudoacacia L.)and umbrella pine(Pinus pinea L.)in Agacli-Istanbul[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2009,159(1-4):407-414.
    [3]付微,邵明安,黄明斌.神府东胜煤田复垦区土壤入渗特性的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):14-17.
    [4]孙泰森,白中科.黄河中游地域露天煤矿排土场复垦方式特殊性的探讨[J].山西农业大学学报,2000,20(4):383-385.
    [5]王文龙.晋陕蒙地区的生态环境特征及其研究[J].水土保持通报,1997,7(17):90-93.
    [6]摄晓燕,张兴昌,魏孝荣.适量砒砂岩改良风沙土的吸水和保水特性[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(14):115-123.
    [7]王志,彭茹燕,王蕾,等.毛乌素沙地南缘改良与利用风沙土性质研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):14-16,21.
    [8]朱元骏,邵明安.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带小流域坡面表土砾石空间分布[J].中国科学:D辑,2008,38(3):375-383.
    [9]王愿昌,吴永红,寇权,等.砒砂岩分布范围界定与类型区划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):14-18.
    [10]臧荫桐,丁国栋,高永,等.采煤沉陷对风沙区土壤非饱和水分入渗的影响[J],水科学进展.2012,23(6):757-767.
    [11]邹慧,毕银丽,金晶晶,等.采煤沉陷对植被土壤容重和水分入渗规律的影响[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,41(3):125-128.
    [12]温明霞,邵明安,周蓓蓓.马家塔露天煤矿复垦区不同土地利用类型的土壤水分入渗过程研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):170-173.
    [13]倪含斌,张丽萍.神东矿区堆积弃土坡地入渗规律试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):28-31.
    [14]赵骍,景峰.阎家沟煤矿区弃土坡模拟降雨入渗规律研究[J].山西水土保持科技,2008(03):17-19.
    [15]杨艳芬,王全九,曾辰,等.土石混合介质水分入渗特性试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):87-90,132.
    [16]刘晓丽,马理辉,杨荣慧,等.黄土半干旱区枣林深层土壤水分消耗特征[J].农业机械学报,2014(12):139-145.
    [17]Hillel Daniel.Applications of Soil Physics[M].Academic Press,CA,San Diego(1998).
    [18]刘建国,王洪涛,聂永丰.多孔介质非饱和导水率预测的分形模型[J].水科学进展,2004,15(3):269-275.
    [19]李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分入渗能力影响模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):40-45.
    [20]吴军虎,张铁钢,赵伟,等.容重对不同有机质含量土壤水分入渗特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):63-67,268.
    [21]刘春成,李毅,任鑫,等.四种入渗模型对斥水土壤入渗规律的适用性[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):62-67.
    [22]刘月梅,张兴昌.EN-1对黄土性固化土水分垂直入渗特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(11):65-73.
    [23]余冬立,郑加兴,刘营营,等.围垦年限和土壤容重对海涂土壤水分运动参数的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015(2):120-25.
    [24]邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
    [25]党宏宇,陈洪松,邵明安.喀斯特地区不同层次土石混合介质对土壤水分入渗过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(8):38-43.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700