三种针刺法治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的优化方案研究
|
摘要
目的：
中风后肌张力增高是中风偏瘫患者常见的并发症,严重影响患者的肢体功能恢复及生活质量。本课题探讨经筋刺法、温针法及透刺法三种不同针刺法对中风后痉挛性偏瘫患者的神经功能缺损、肢体痉挛程度、运动功能和日常生活能力的影响,评价这三种疗法对中风后痉挛性偏瘫的作用优势,对中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的改善进行疗效评价及方案优化选择,以便为众多此类患者寻求更为有效、直接、肯定的治疗方法,并为临床针灸治疗中风后肌张力增高提供科学的依据。
方法：
1、病例选择：90例符合诊断标准和纳入标准的中风后肢体痉挛性瘫痪患者,随机分为经筋刺法组、温针组、透刺组各30例。三组病例入选时基线资料具有可比性(P>0.05)。
2、基础治疗：三组患者的基础药物治疗均参照《中国脑血管病防治指南》(卫生部疾病控制司、中华医学会神经病学会,2005)的方案控制血压、血糖、调节血脂、给予阿斯匹林防止血小板聚集,对症治疗、防治并发症等。
3、治疗方法：“经筋刺法组”取穴：以患侧肢体肩、肘、腕、掌指、髋、膝、踝等关节附近肌腱两侧的压痛点为主穴,以痛为腧；“温针法组”取穴：患侧上肢：肩髑、尺泽、手三里、合谷,患侧下肢：风市、足三里、阳陵泉、三阴交；“透刺法组”取穴：患侧上肢取穴为肩髑透臂臑、曲池透少海、外关透内关、合谷透后溪,患侧下肢取穴为伏兔透殷门、阴陵泉透阳陵泉、三阴交透悬钟、昆仑透太溪。每组穴位均按规定的具体针刺方法、针刺角度、针刺深度、行针次数等参数进行操作。
4、疗程：每组每日操作一次,5天一疗程,休息2天后进行下一个疗程,共治疗3个疗程,共21天。常规基础药物治疗21天。
5、疗效评定：对所有患者均于治疗前、后分别采用国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表、临床神经功能缺损程度量表(NDS)、日常生活能力量表(ADL)、修改的Ashworth痉挛量表、临床痉挛指数CSI量表五方面对三种针刺法的治疗效果进行观察及分析评价。
结果：
1、国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组治疗前后比较(P<0.01),透刺组、经筋组及温针组均有较为显著的疗效。组间比较：经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法均能降低患者国家中医药局脑病急症诊疗标准量表总分值,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
(2)程度比较：三组病例在治疗后程度方面比较显示,透刺组轻型的比例由73.3%增加到83.3%；经筋组轻型的比例由53.3%增加到100%；温针组轻型的比例由53.3%增加到76.7%。说明三组病例经治疗后程度均有好转,其中经筋组最为明显。
(3)疗效比较：三组病例经治疗后,透刺组的有效率为70%,经筋组有效率为96.7%,温针组有效率为86.7%,三组改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
2、临床神经功能缺损程度(NDS)量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组治疗前后比较(P<0.01),说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组均有较为显著的疗效。组间比较：经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法均能降低患者NDS总分值,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
(2)各项目评分比较：
言语方面在组内及组间比较(P>0.05)说明三组治疗无显著差异。
面瘫方面组内治疗前后差值比较,经筋组和温针组(P<0.05)有一定改善效果；各组间比较(P>0.05)说明三组病例的改善程度在此方面没有显著差别。
上肢肩关节肌力、手肌力组内治疗前后差值比较,三组在上肢肩关节肌力方面均有提高,且有统计学意义(P<0.01)；在手肌力方面,只有温针组与经筋组较治疗前有改善(P<0.01)；组间经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组病例均可以改善上肢肩关节肌力,温针组与经筋组可以改善手肌力,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
下肢肌力、步行能力三组组内治疗前后差值比较(P<0.01)差异均有统计学意义；组间经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P>0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组病例均可以改善下肢肌力和步行能力,但以经筋组为最显著,温针组与透刺组无显著差别。
3、日常生活活动能力(ADL)量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组病例经过治疗后,日常生活活动能力评分P值均小于0.05,说明三组病例均较治疗前有所改善,且以经筋组的改变值为最大。
组间比较：治疗前后差值比较(P>0.05)三组差异无统计学意义；说明三组病例在日常生活活动能力评分总分方面的改善程度无显著性差异。
(2)程度比较：三组病例在日常生活活动能力(ADL)量表缺陷程度比较方面,治疗前(P>0.05)三组间无统计学差异；治疗后(P>0.05)差异无统计学意义,说明三组在改善ADL缺陷程度方面无明显的差异。
4、修改的Ashworth量表评分
组内比较：三组病例修改的Ashworth量表评分治疗前后比较,经筋组和温针组(P<0.01)透刺组(P>0.05)说明经筋组及温针组均有改善上肢肢体痉挛的疗效。
组间比较：透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.05)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法在改善上肢痉挛程度方面,改善程度依次为：温针组>经筋组>透刺组。
5、临床痉挛指数CSI量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组病例临床痉挛指数CSI量表评分总分治疗前后比较(P<0.01)说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组治疗前后均有较为显著的疗效。
组间比较：三组病例治疗前后差值比较(P<0.05)三组间存在差异；经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三组治疗方法均能改善下肢痉挛程度,三组病例的改善程度依次为：温针组>经筋组>透刺组。
(2)各项目比较：
组内比较：三组病例在腱反射、肌张力方面治疗前后比较(P<0.05)、在阵挛方面,温针组治疗前后(P<0.05)说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组均可以改善患者下肢腱反射、肌张力状况,此外,温针组还可以改善下肢阵挛情况。
组间比较：在腱反射方面,经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P>0.05)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三种方法在改善下肢腱反射中,温针组改善最为明显,经筋组与透刺组之间的差异无统计学意义。
在肌张力方面,经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三种方法在改善下肢肌张力异常增高方面中,温针组优于经筋组,经筋组优于透刺组。
在阵挛方面,治疗前后差值(P>0.05)说明三组病例在阵挛方面治疗无明显差异。
结论：
透刺组、温针组及经筋组在国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表、临床神经功能缺损程度评分方面均有一定程度的好转,尤其在改善上肢肩关节肌力、下肢肌力和步行能力方面,三组均有良好的治疗效果,但以经筋组疗效最为显著。
本研究中将上肢的痉挛程度评定采用修改的Ashworth评分,下肢的痉挛评定程度采用CSI量表评分。研究结果表明：经筋组及温针组均能较明显的改善上肢痉挛状态,其中以温针组改善最为明显。三组均能有效的改善下肢痉挛程度,尤其在腱反射和下肢肌张力方面,以温针组改善最为明显。
Objective
Hypermyotonia of flexors is a common complication in patients with hemiplegia after stroke and severely affects patients'recovery of neural and muscular functiona and reduces their quality of lives. The effects of musculature puncture therapy (MPT), needle warming therapy (NWT) and penetration needling therapy (PNT) on neurologic impairment, spasticity, motor function, activities of daily living (ADL) of spastic hemiplegia patients after stroke were observed. The research helps to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the three methods on spastic hemiplegia after stroke and provides the best treatment to patients with hemiplegia spasticity after stroke. It has good value of clinical application to effectively, directly and positively prevent the occurrence and aggravation of spasm. Moreover, the effective clinical therapy is a scientific proof for spastic hemiplegia after stroke.
Methods
1. Selection of subjects: ninety cases subjecting to diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria of spastic hemiplegia after stroke were enrolled into the study. During the experiment, the patients were randomized into MPT group (N=30), NWT group (N=30) and PNT group (N=30). The baseline was similar in the three groups (P>0.05).
2. Basic treatment:The drug treatment included drugs for controlling blood pressure and blood sugar, drugs for regulating blood lipid, and aspermin for preventing platelet aggregation. The drug treatment followed China Guideline for Prevention and Cure of Cerebrovascular Disease issued by Disease Control Department of Ministry of Public Health, and Chinese Medical Association Neurology Association in2005. If necessary, symptomatic treatment, and prevention and cure of complications were also carried out.
3. Therapies:In MPT group, the main acupoints consisted of the pain points near patients'shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, metacarpophalangeal joint, ankle. In NWT group, there were four points in upper limbs, including qianyu, chize, shousanli,hegu and there were four points in lower limbs, including fengshi, zusanli, yanglingquan, sanyinjiao;In PNTgroup, we adopted penetrating from the point to point, including from jianyu to binao, from quchi to shaohai, from waiguan to neiguan, from hegu to houxi, from futu to yinmen, from yinlingquan to yanglingquan, from sanyinjiao to xuanzhong, from kunlun to taixi. The manipulation of all the acupoints was carried out subjecting to the specified requirement.
4. Period of treatment:The period of treatment in the three groups lasted21days. Every group was performed5times a week, and continued after2-day break for3weeks. The basic drug treatment lasted21days in the three groups.
5. Evaluation of therapeutic effect:Before treatment and after treatment, The changes of the five indexes were observed for the evaluation of the therapeutic effect, including Acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine clinical neurologic impairment degree scale (NDS), modified Ashworth scale, clinical spasticity index(CSI), and activities of daily living (ADL) with Barthel's index.
Results
1. Acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group, P<0.01, there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant before treatment (P>0.05). The results of difference comparison after treatment showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group reduced the total score on acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine, and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
(2) Comparison of degree:After treatment, the light ratio increased from73.3%to83.3%in PNT group, from53.3%to100%in MPT group and from53.3%to76.7%in NWT group. It showed it help to improve the degree of disease for every group and the MPT group was the best among groups.
(3) Comparison of curative effect:the total effects were70%,96.7%and86.7%in PNT group, MPT group and NWT group respectively. The differences in the three groups were significant (P<0.05) after treatment and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.2.Scores of neurologic impairment (NDS)
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group,(P<0.01) there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group reduced the total score of NDS and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
(2) Comparison of different symptoms:
For comparison of speech within every group and between groups, P was larger than0.05and it meant that there was no statistical significance. It showed that every group had not significance difference on treatment.
For comparison of facial paralysis within every group,(P<0.05) there was statistical significance in MPT and NWT groups. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05). The results shows that there is no significance difference among three groups.
For comparison of muscle strengths of shoulder and hand within every group, P was less than0.01in the muscle strengths of shoulder in every group and in the muscle strengths of hand in NWT and MPT groups. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, and P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group improved the muscle strengths of shoulder and MPT and NWT groups improved the muscle strengths of hand too. The therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
For comparison of muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability within every group, P was less than0.01in the muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability in every group. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group improved the muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability. The therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and there is no significant difference between NWT group and PNT group.
3. Activities of daily living (ADL) with Barthel's index.
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group,(P<0.05) there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) after treatment and and it shows that there has no significant difference on three groups.
(2) Comparison of degree:Before treatment,(P>0.05) there was no statistical significance on three groups. After treatment, The differences of degree in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) and it showed that there had no significant difference in three groups.
4. modified Ashworth scale.
Within every group:P were less than0.01in MPT and NWT groups. Additionally, P were larger than0.05in PNT group.It showed that MPT and NWT groups had good effect on improvement spasticity of the upper limbs
Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and MPT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and NWT group. It showed that every group improved the spasticity of the upper limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
5. clinical spasticity index(CSI)
(1) Comparison of total score:
Within every group:P were less than0.01in three groups. It showed that every group had good effect on improvement spasticity of the lower limbs
Between groups:The differences of scores in the three groups were statistical significant (P<0.05). The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group, between MPT group and NWT group and between PNT group and NWT group. It showed that every group improved the spasticity of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
(2)Comparison of different symptoms:
Within every group:P were less than0.05in three groups for the tendon reflex and muscle tone of the lower limbs, and P were less than0.05in NWT group for clonus of the lower limbs. It showed that every group had good effect on the tendon reflex and muscle tone of the lower limbs and NWT group had good effect on clonus of the lower limbs.
Between groups:
For comparison of the tendon reflex, P was larger than0.05between PNT and MPT group, moreover P was less than0.01between MPT and NWT group and between PNT and NWT group.It showed that every group improved the tendon reflex of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and there was no significance difference between PNT and MPT group
For comparison of the muscle tone, P was less than0.01among three groups. It showed that every group improves the muscle tone of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and there was no significance difference between PNT and MPT group. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
For comparison of the clonus, between groups, the differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) after treatment and it showed that there had no significant difference in three groups for the clonus of the lower limbs.
Conclusion
The effects of musculature puncture therapy (MPT), needle warming therapy (NWT), penetration needling therapy(PNT) on acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine and clinical neurologic impairment degree scale (NDS) were remarkable, especially for muscle strengths of shoulder, muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability. Additionally, musculature puncture therapy was the best on these ways.
The research adopted the modified Ashworth scale to observe the spasticity of the upper limbs and adopted the clinical spasticity index (CSI) to observe the spasticity of the lower limbs. The MPT and NWT groups improved obviously the spasticity of the upper limbs and every group improved obviously the spasticity of the lower limbs, especially the tendon reflex and the muscle tone. Additionally, needle warming therapy was the best on these ways.
中风后肌张力增高是中风偏瘫患者常见的并发症,严重影响患者的肢体功能恢复及生活质量。本课题探讨经筋刺法、温针法及透刺法三种不同针刺法对中风后痉挛性偏瘫患者的神经功能缺损、肢体痉挛程度、运动功能和日常生活能力的影响,评价这三种疗法对中风后痉挛性偏瘫的作用优势,对中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的改善进行疗效评价及方案优化选择,以便为众多此类患者寻求更为有效、直接、肯定的治疗方法,并为临床针灸治疗中风后肌张力增高提供科学的依据。
方法：
1、病例选择：90例符合诊断标准和纳入标准的中风后肢体痉挛性瘫痪患者,随机分为经筋刺法组、温针组、透刺组各30例。三组病例入选时基线资料具有可比性(P>0.05)。
2、基础治疗：三组患者的基础药物治疗均参照《中国脑血管病防治指南》(卫生部疾病控制司、中华医学会神经病学会,2005)的方案控制血压、血糖、调节血脂、给予阿斯匹林防止血小板聚集,对症治疗、防治并发症等。
3、治疗方法：“经筋刺法组”取穴：以患侧肢体肩、肘、腕、掌指、髋、膝、踝等关节附近肌腱两侧的压痛点为主穴,以痛为腧；“温针法组”取穴：患侧上肢：肩髑、尺泽、手三里、合谷,患侧下肢：风市、足三里、阳陵泉、三阴交；“透刺法组”取穴：患侧上肢取穴为肩髑透臂臑、曲池透少海、外关透内关、合谷透后溪,患侧下肢取穴为伏兔透殷门、阴陵泉透阳陵泉、三阴交透悬钟、昆仑透太溪。每组穴位均按规定的具体针刺方法、针刺角度、针刺深度、行针次数等参数进行操作。
4、疗程：每组每日操作一次,5天一疗程,休息2天后进行下一个疗程,共治疗3个疗程,共21天。常规基础药物治疗21天。
5、疗效评定：对所有患者均于治疗前、后分别采用国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表、临床神经功能缺损程度量表(NDS)、日常生活能力量表(ADL)、修改的Ashworth痉挛量表、临床痉挛指数CSI量表五方面对三种针刺法的治疗效果进行观察及分析评价。
结果：
1、国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组治疗前后比较(P<0.01),透刺组、经筋组及温针组均有较为显著的疗效。组间比较：经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法均能降低患者国家中医药局脑病急症诊疗标准量表总分值,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
(2)程度比较：三组病例在治疗后程度方面比较显示,透刺组轻型的比例由73.3%增加到83.3%；经筋组轻型的比例由53.3%增加到100%；温针组轻型的比例由53.3%增加到76.7%。说明三组病例经治疗后程度均有好转,其中经筋组最为明显。
(3)疗效比较：三组病例经治疗后,透刺组的有效率为70%,经筋组有效率为96.7%,温针组有效率为86.7%,三组改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
2、临床神经功能缺损程度(NDS)量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组治疗前后比较(P<0.01),说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组均有较为显著的疗效。组间比较：经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法均能降低患者NDS总分值,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
(2)各项目评分比较：
言语方面在组内及组间比较(P>0.05)说明三组治疗无显著差异。
面瘫方面组内治疗前后差值比较,经筋组和温针组(P<0.05)有一定改善效果；各组间比较(P>0.05)说明三组病例的改善程度在此方面没有显著差别。
上肢肩关节肌力、手肌力组内治疗前后差值比较,三组在上肢肩关节肌力方面均有提高,且有统计学意义(P<0.01)；在手肌力方面,只有温针组与经筋组较治疗前有改善(P<0.01)；组间经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组病例均可以改善上肢肩关节肌力,温针组与经筋组可以改善手肌力,三组病例的改善程度依次为：经筋组>温针组>透刺组。
下肢肌力、步行能力三组组内治疗前后差值比较(P<0.01)差异均有统计学意义；组间经两两比较,透刺组与经筋刺组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P>0.05)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组病例均可以改善下肢肌力和步行能力,但以经筋组为最显著,温针组与透刺组无显著差别。
3、日常生活活动能力(ADL)量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组病例经过治疗后,日常生活活动能力评分P值均小于0.05,说明三组病例均较治疗前有所改善,且以经筋组的改变值为最大。
组间比较：治疗前后差值比较(P>0.05)三组差异无统计学意义；说明三组病例在日常生活活动能力评分总分方面的改善程度无显著性差异。
(2)程度比较：三组病例在日常生活活动能力(ADL)量表缺陷程度比较方面,治疗前(P>0.05)三组间无统计学差异；治疗后(P>0.05)差异无统计学意义,说明三组在改善ADL缺陷程度方面无明显的差异。
4、修改的Ashworth量表评分
组内比较：三组病例修改的Ashworth量表评分治疗前后比较,经筋组和温针组(P<0.01)透刺组(P>0.05)说明经筋组及温针组均有改善上肢肢体痉挛的疗效。
组间比较：透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.05)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.05)说明三组治疗方法在改善上肢痉挛程度方面,改善程度依次为：温针组>经筋组>透刺组。
5、临床痉挛指数CSI量表评分
(1)总分比较：组内比较：三组病例临床痉挛指数CSI量表评分总分治疗前后比较(P<0.01)说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组治疗前后均有较为显著的疗效。
组间比较：三组病例治疗前后差值比较(P<0.05)三组间存在差异；经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三组治疗方法均能改善下肢痉挛程度,三组病例的改善程度依次为：温针组>经筋组>透刺组。
(2)各项目比较：
组内比较：三组病例在腱反射、肌张力方面治疗前后比较(P<0.05)、在阵挛方面,温针组治疗前后(P<0.05)说明透刺组、经筋组及温针组均可以改善患者下肢腱反射、肌张力状况,此外,温针组还可以改善下肢阵挛情况。
组间比较：在腱反射方面,经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P>0.05)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三种方法在改善下肢腱反射中,温针组改善最为明显,经筋组与透刺组之间的差异无统计学意义。
在肌张力方面,经两两比较,透刺组与经筋组比较(P<0.01)、透刺组与温针组比较(P<0.01)、经筋组与温针组比较(P<0.01)说明三种方法在改善下肢肌张力异常增高方面中,温针组优于经筋组,经筋组优于透刺组。
在阵挛方面,治疗前后差值(P>0.05)说明三组病例在阵挛方面治疗无明显差异。
结论：
透刺组、温针组及经筋组在国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组中风病诊断与疗效评定标准量表、临床神经功能缺损程度评分方面均有一定程度的好转,尤其在改善上肢肩关节肌力、下肢肌力和步行能力方面,三组均有良好的治疗效果,但以经筋组疗效最为显著。
本研究中将上肢的痉挛程度评定采用修改的Ashworth评分,下肢的痉挛评定程度采用CSI量表评分。研究结果表明：经筋组及温针组均能较明显的改善上肢痉挛状态,其中以温针组改善最为明显。三组均能有效的改善下肢痉挛程度,尤其在腱反射和下肢肌张力方面,以温针组改善最为明显。
Objective
Hypermyotonia of flexors is a common complication in patients with hemiplegia after stroke and severely affects patients'recovery of neural and muscular functiona and reduces their quality of lives. The effects of musculature puncture therapy (MPT), needle warming therapy (NWT) and penetration needling therapy (PNT) on neurologic impairment, spasticity, motor function, activities of daily living (ADL) of spastic hemiplegia patients after stroke were observed. The research helps to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the three methods on spastic hemiplegia after stroke and provides the best treatment to patients with hemiplegia spasticity after stroke. It has good value of clinical application to effectively, directly and positively prevent the occurrence and aggravation of spasm. Moreover, the effective clinical therapy is a scientific proof for spastic hemiplegia after stroke.
Methods
1. Selection of subjects: ninety cases subjecting to diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria of spastic hemiplegia after stroke were enrolled into the study. During the experiment, the patients were randomized into MPT group (N=30), NWT group (N=30) and PNT group (N=30). The baseline was similar in the three groups (P>0.05).
2. Basic treatment:The drug treatment included drugs for controlling blood pressure and blood sugar, drugs for regulating blood lipid, and aspermin for preventing platelet aggregation. The drug treatment followed China Guideline for Prevention and Cure of Cerebrovascular Disease issued by Disease Control Department of Ministry of Public Health, and Chinese Medical Association Neurology Association in2005. If necessary, symptomatic treatment, and prevention and cure of complications were also carried out.
3. Therapies:In MPT group, the main acupoints consisted of the pain points near patients'shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, metacarpophalangeal joint, ankle. In NWT group, there were four points in upper limbs, including qianyu, chize, shousanli,hegu and there were four points in lower limbs, including fengshi, zusanli, yanglingquan, sanyinjiao;In PNTgroup, we adopted penetrating from the point to point, including from jianyu to binao, from quchi to shaohai, from waiguan to neiguan, from hegu to houxi, from futu to yinmen, from yinlingquan to yanglingquan, from sanyinjiao to xuanzhong, from kunlun to taixi. The manipulation of all the acupoints was carried out subjecting to the specified requirement.
4. Period of treatment:The period of treatment in the three groups lasted21days. Every group was performed5times a week, and continued after2-day break for3weeks. The basic drug treatment lasted21days in the three groups.
5. Evaluation of therapeutic effect:Before treatment and after treatment, The changes of the five indexes were observed for the evaluation of the therapeutic effect, including Acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine clinical neurologic impairment degree scale (NDS), modified Ashworth scale, clinical spasticity index(CSI), and activities of daily living (ADL) with Barthel's index.
Results
1. Acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group, P<0.01, there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant before treatment (P>0.05). The results of difference comparison after treatment showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group reduced the total score on acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine, and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
(2) Comparison of degree:After treatment, the light ratio increased from73.3%to83.3%in PNT group, from53.3%to100%in MPT group and from53.3%to76.7%in NWT group. It showed it help to improve the degree of disease for every group and the MPT group was the best among groups.
(3) Comparison of curative effect:the total effects were70%,96.7%and86.7%in PNT group, MPT group and NWT group respectively. The differences in the three groups were significant (P<0.05) after treatment and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.2.Scores of neurologic impairment (NDS)
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group,(P<0.01) there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group reduced the total score of NDS and the therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
(2) Comparison of different symptoms:
For comparison of speech within every group and between groups, P was larger than0.05and it meant that there was no statistical significance. It showed that every group had not significance difference on treatment.
For comparison of facial paralysis within every group,(P<0.05) there was statistical significance in MPT and NWT groups. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05). The results shows that there is no significance difference among three groups.
For comparison of muscle strengths of shoulder and hand within every group, P was less than0.01in the muscle strengths of shoulder in every group and in the muscle strengths of hand in NWT and MPT groups. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, and P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group improved the muscle strengths of shoulder and MPT and NWT groups improved the muscle strengths of hand too. The therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and then came NWT group and PNT group.
For comparison of muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability within every group, P was less than0.01in the muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability in every group. Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and NWT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group. It showed that every group improved the muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability. The therapeutic effect was best in the MPT group, and there is no significant difference between NWT group and PNT group.
3. Activities of daily living (ADL) with Barthel's index.
(1) Comparison of total score:Within every group,(P<0.05) there was statistical significance and it showed that every group had good effect on treatment. Between groups, The differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) after treatment and and it shows that there has no significant difference on three groups.
(2) Comparison of degree:Before treatment,(P>0.05) there was no statistical significance on three groups. After treatment, The differences of degree in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) and it showed that there had no significant difference in three groups.
4. modified Ashworth scale.
Within every group:P were less than0.01in MPT and NWT groups. Additionally, P were larger than0.05in PNT group.It showed that MPT and NWT groups had good effect on improvement spasticity of the upper limbs
Between groups, The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.05between PNT group and MPT group, between MPT group and NWT group, moreover, P was less than0.01between PNT group and NWT group. It showed that every group improved the spasticity of the upper limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
5. clinical spasticity index(CSI)
(1) Comparison of total score:
Within every group:P were less than0.01in three groups. It showed that every group had good effect on improvement spasticity of the lower limbs
Between groups:The differences of scores in the three groups were statistical significant (P<0.05). The results of difference comparison showed that P was less than0.01between PNT group and MPT group, between MPT group and NWT group and between PNT group and NWT group. It showed that every group improved the spasticity of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
(2)Comparison of different symptoms:
Within every group:P were less than0.05in three groups for the tendon reflex and muscle tone of the lower limbs, and P were less than0.05in NWT group for clonus of the lower limbs. It showed that every group had good effect on the tendon reflex and muscle tone of the lower limbs and NWT group had good effect on clonus of the lower limbs.
Between groups:
For comparison of the tendon reflex, P was larger than0.05between PNT and MPT group, moreover P was less than0.01between MPT and NWT group and between PNT and NWT group.It showed that every group improved the tendon reflex of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and there was no significance difference between PNT and MPT group
For comparison of the muscle tone, P was less than0.01among three groups. It showed that every group improves the muscle tone of the lower limbs. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and there was no significance difference between PNT and MPT group. The therapeutic effect was best in the NWT group, and then came MPT group and PNT group.
For comparison of the clonus, between groups, the differences of scores in the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05) after treatment and it showed that there had no significant difference in three groups for the clonus of the lower limbs.
Conclusion
The effects of musculature puncture therapy (MPT), needle warming therapy (NWT), penetration needling therapy(PNT) on acute stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation criteria of State Administration of traditional Chinese medicine and clinical neurologic impairment degree scale (NDS) were remarkable, especially for muscle strengths of shoulder, muscle strengths of lower limbs and walking ability. Additionally, musculature puncture therapy was the best on these ways.
The research adopted the modified Ashworth scale to observe the spasticity of the upper limbs and adopted the clinical spasticity index (CSI) to observe the spasticity of the lower limbs. The MPT and NWT groups improved obviously the spasticity of the upper limbs and every group improved obviously the spasticity of the lower limbs, especially the tendon reflex and the muscle tone. Additionally, needle warming therapy was the best on these ways.
引文
[1]Klijn CJ, Hankey GJ. Management of acute ischaemic storke:new guidelines from the American stroke Association and European Stroke tmitiation. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2 (11): 698-701
[2]包华.尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗脑梗死研究[J].中国综合临床,2002,18(1)：55-56
[3]刘铭,王海萍,余曙光.针灸治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的研究进展[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(7)：54-56
[4]McGuke JR, Harvey RL The prevention and management of complieations after stroke [J].Phys Med Rehabil C lin N Am,1999,10:857-874
[5]王志静.脑卒中流行病学分析.中华流行病学杂志.2003,24(2)：73-74
[6]朱镛连主编.《神经病学神经康复学》.北京人民军医出版社.2001,321-322
[7]郭志玲.祛痰逐瘀法治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪36例临床观察.中国中医药信息杂志,2000,7(6)：57
[8]王民生.脑卒中偏瘫痉挛期的中医药辨证论治.北京中医药大学学报.2000,23(12)：75-76
[9]孙西庆.温阳熄风化痰法治疗中风病痉挛性偏瘫临床观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2010,8(1)：45.
[10]范刚启,张道斌,罗伟.针灸治疗中风病.[M].上海：第二军医大学出版社,2001：91-96.
[11]程金莲,王麟鹏,王少松,等.“王氏夹脊穴”逆针灸治疗对脑卒中偏瘫痉挛状态117例随机对照观察[J].北京中医,2007,26(8)：467-469.
[12]钟长明,林洪茂,刘庆芳,等.针刺与肌张力平衡促通法对中风偏瘫病人早期康复的作用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2001,16(3)：180.
[13]雷龙鸣,庞军,陈家兴,等.不同针刺方案对偏瘫早期康复作用的临床观察[J].中国针灸,2005,25(4)：233-236.
[14]范刚启,王辉,陶月玉,等.脑梗死患者上肢瘫针刺治疗方案的优选及其对内皮素的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2003,23(2)：102-104.
[15]王国书,俞昌德.颅体针结合治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪35例[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(8)：12-13
[16]王春玲,宋淑娟,徐慧荣等.头针及吸氧法治疗中风偏瘫的50例临床观察.针灸临床杂志.2002,18(4)：20-21
[17]吕慧青,遇永琴.针刺三阴经治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫60例分析[J].北京中医药大学学报.2001,24(4)：54-55
[18]汪凌圳.头皮针抽提法对脑血栓形成后偏瘫患肢不同部位肌力影响的临床研究.浙江中医杂志.2005,7：292-194
[19]王丽平,薄智云.薄氏腹针疗法临床体会[J].中国针灸.2004,24(3)：201
[20]祝晓忠.腹针治疗中风后肢体肌张力增高的临床研究[J].中国医师杂志,2006(增刊)：219-220
[21]周炜,王丽平.腹针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效观察[J].中国针灸.2005,25(11)：757-759
[22]岳增辉,刘伍立.筋经刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛及疗效评价研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志.2001,8(4)：85
[23]于学平,滕秀英.经筋刺法治疗中风上肢痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志.2004,20(4)：20-22
[24]徐永豪,王涛.透刺法治疗中风痉挛偏瘫40例疗效观察.宁夏医学院学报,1997,19(2)：90
[25]揭子慧.透针治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的临床观察.天津中医药.2011,28(3)：199
[26]姜桂美,吴思平,贾超,等.不同刺激量针刺拮抗肌与主动肌治疗脑卒中痉挛性瘫痪的临床疗效观察.针灸临床杂志.2008,24(11)：1-3
[27]李红星,罗利敏,刘东坡,等.针刺拮抗肌腧穴治疗中风后肢体痉挛临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2011,30(4)：252-253
[28]郭泽新,汪润生.分部针刺治疗中风偏瘫痉挛68例临床研究[J].中国针灸,1995,(5)：7-8
[29]李月梅,江钢辉,李艳慧,等.针刺神经干穴位配合井穴麦粒灸治疗中风后肢体功能障碍50例疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2010,37(7)：1364-1365
[30]娄必丹,章薇,刘智,等.张力平衡法对脑卒中痉挛瘫痪患者血脂和血糖的调节作用[J].中国康复,2006,21(2)：81-82.
[31]王二争,夏清,谢宗亮,等.芒针透刺督脉配合生物刺激反馈治疗脑卒中痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究.安徽医学,2009,30(12)：1397-1399.
[32]王东升,王顺,尚艳杰,等.推针手法治疗中风后指过屈疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2008,31(4)：267-269.
[33]高志颖.电针跷脉穴治疗中风偏瘫下肢肌痉挛状态35例临床观察[J].中医药导报,2007,13(3)：53-55.
[34]金泽,李兆贤,王玉琳等.双针并刺治疗中风后上肢肌张力增高疗效观察.上海针灸杂志,2011,30(8)：529-531.
[35]王乡斌、何坚,李天骄,等.不同频率电针治疗脑卒中下肢痉挛患者最大等长收缩的表面肌电图研究.福建中医学院学报.2008,18(6)：40-42
[36]王英姿,何丽君,王纯强.电针拮抗肌穴位结合运动疗法治疗脑卒中后肌痉挛.中外医疗.2008,23：17-18
[37]房显辉,周鹏,周蔚华,等.温针治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2011,27(4)：50-51
[38]马素兰、冯玲媚.温针灸合谷、足三里治疗中风偏瘫疗效观察.辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(11)：1627-1628
[39]刘茂德,虢英存.头针结合小针刀治疗偏瘫性肩痛症[J].上海针灸杂志,2002,21(5)：33
[40]王桂芳.火针针刺拮抗肌治疗脑血管病肌痉挛疗效分析.中国康复医学杂志.2008,23(2)：163-164
[41]高天宇,梅富华,段文清,等.对火针治疗脑中风后上肢痉挛疗效的评价[J].内蒙古中医药.2005,5：7-8
[42]王森,刘洁.灯盏花穴位注射治疗脑卒中偏瘫后上肢痉挛30例临床研究.安徽中医临床杂志.2003,15(5)：393-394
[43]蒋再轶,韩国栋,冯建宏.血塞通注射液痉挛点注射治疗脑卒中后肢体痉挛22例临床研究.中医药导报.2011,17(11)：16-18
[44]苗广宇,徐国庆,等.针刺加十二井穴放血疗法缓解肢体痉挛的疗效观察[J].中国疗养医学,2006,15(5)：326-327.
[45]苗广宇,周立秋,等.浮针疗法治疗脑卒中后偏瘫痉挛状态150例.中国针灸,2009年增刊,7-8.
[46]马玲.针刺结合麦粒灸缓解中风偏瘫肌痉挛的疗效观察[J].广西中医药.2002,25(1)：41
[47]倪卫民,沈洁.刺络拔罐法对减低中风后上肢肌张力增高的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志.2004,23(7)：10.
[48]李思,张智龙(指导).张智龙教授治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态经验.陕西中医.2010,31(9)：1197-1198.
[49]柳迎春.“加味黄芪桂枝五物汤”治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪30例临床观察.江苏中医药杂志.2010,42(5)：31-33.
[50]谭爱玲,吕端.养阴柔肝通络法治疗缺血性中风后痉挛30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药杂志.2006,27(8)：24-25.
[51]陈党红,蔡业峰.舒筋颗粒对30例卒中后肌张力增高患者FM、BI的影响.新中医,2008,40(2)：43-44.
[52]魏岳斌,郝建军,黄伯梯,等.柔筋汤治疗脑卒中恢复期痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究.中国中医药现代远程教育,2011,9(7)：17-18
[53]谢仁明,陈红霞,王知非,等.中药浸浴及内服结合康复训练治疗中风后肢体痉挛60例[J].山东中医杂志,2011,30(1)：18-20
[54]董福生,丁玉庆,张文慧.脑卒中后肩手综合征的手法康复研究[J].中国康复理论与实践.2000,8(3)：162
[55]林森.中草药外用治疗中风后遗症临床探讨[J].中国民族民间医药.2011,(11)：82-83
[56]芦玉莲,陈文卫,张宇艳.中药熏洗治疗中风后患肢肿胀128例[J].实用中医内科学杂志.2007,21(2)：83
[57]中华人民共和国卫生部医政司主编.中国康复医学诊疗规范[M].北京：华夏出版社,1999.20.
[58]Delisa JA主编.南登昆,郭正成主译.康复医学理论与实践[M].第三版。西安：世界图书出版西安公司,2004.890-891.
[59]Brunnstroml. Movement Therapy in hemiplegia MI.New York. A NeuroPhysiological Approach harper and Row Publishers,1970;103-105
[60]Hallet M.The neurophysiogy of dystonia. Arch Neurol 1998,55(5):601-603
[61]岳增辉,袁建菱,姜京明.经筋论治脑卒中后痉挛状态及对脑脊液Glu. GABA的影响[J].中国针灸,2004,24(8)：565-567
[62]Barber BP, Vaughn JR. The origin, distruction and synaptic relationships of substance P axons in rat spinal cord [J].J Comp Neurol.1979,184 (2):331-351.
[63]钱书森,余晓英,徐承焘,等.辣椒素治疗截瘫后下肢肌肉紧张度增高的实验研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,1999,5(2)：57.
[64]Golanov EV.Reis DJ. Neuroprotextiveelectrical stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus attenuates expression of peri infarction depolarizing waves [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,1997,17:381.
[65]李平.针刺对脑梗塞模型大鼠海马游离氨基酸水平影响的实验研究[J].针灸研究,1998,23(4)：257-261.
[66]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议各类脑血管病诊断要点.中华神经科杂志.1996,29(6)：379-380.
[67]国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报.1996,19(1)：55-56
[68]王兴林,高继亭,郭燕梅.脑病变部位大小与Brunstrom偏瘫恢复阶段及痉挛程度的关系[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2003,25(2)：109-111.
[69]Miyai I Blau AD.Reding MJ,et al. Pations with stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to rehabilitation efforts, neurology,1997,48:95-101.
[70]Pantano P, Formisano R Ricci M, et al. Moror recovery after stroke, Morphological and functional brain alternations. Brain,1996,119:1849-1857.
[71]Shleton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke,2001,32:107-112.
[72]刘立荣.脑卒中患者康复期的心理护理[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(21)：196-197.
[73]冯亚青,李艳梅,王建华.脑卒中偏瘫患者两手皮肤温度的评测[J].现代康复,2001,5(3)：69.
[74]王茂斌.脑卒中的康复治疗[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2006,58-59.
[75]Ashwowth B. Practitioner.1964;192(3):540-542.
[76]Levin MF, Hui Chan CWY. Are Hand stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity[J]. Journal of Nerology.1993; 240:63-71.
[77]Levin MF, Hui Chan CWY. Ankle spasticity idinversely correlated with antagonist voluntary contraetion in hemiparetic subjeets[J]. Eleetromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology.1994; 34:415-425.
[78]甘森,肖卫民,陈仰昆.乙哌立松缓解脑卒中后肌张力增高：随机对照观察[J].中国临床康复.2004,13(8)：2412-2413
[79]Elovic E. Principles of pharmaceutical management of spastichypertonia. Phys Med RehabilClin N A m.2001,12:793-816
[80]秦绍森,张晓燕,罗盛,等.巴氯芬在中风后中期的临床应用研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志.2001,9(2)：93
[81]Bittiger H.Basic Aspects of Inhibitory Transmitter AminoAcidsin Spasticity and Painin Marsden CD (ED). Treating Spasticity Pharmacological Advances. Toronto:HansHu berPub,1998:20-30
[82]张自茂,张盘德.巴氯芬对偏瘫患者肢体功能恢复的影响.中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(8)：486-487
[83]姜秀芹,张克克,王从光,等.力奥来素在脑血管意外偏瘫痉挛期的应用.中原医刊.2003,30(1)：3-4
[84]Pinto O. Revriew of clinical trials with lieosesl in sump.Vienna,1971,197
[85]廖华薇.美多巴对卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的影响.海南医学.2007,18(5)：101
[86]赵铁成,赵铁英,董洪亮,等.郝智治疗脑卒中后肌张力增高的疗效观察.中国临床康复,2004,8(4)：705-715.
[87]廖华薇.美多巴对卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的影响.[J].海南医学,2007,18(5)：101-168.
[88]崔利华,张通.A型肉毒毒素在治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛中的应用[J].中国康复理论与实践.2005,11(9)：706-708
[89]赵艳茹,李长春,崔其福.A型肉毒毒素治疗对脑卒中患者下肢痉挛步态的改善效应.中国临床康复,2005,5(9)：4-5.
[90]刘小艳,付耀高,赵志华.重复注射A型肉毒毒素治疗卒中后上肢肌痉挛状态.广东医学,2006,27(11)：1744-1746
[91]李震宇,孙涛,华启海,等.两种方法注射A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后前臂肌痉挛疗效观察,2007,32(2)：192-193
[92]王征美,孙岚,房立岩.缺血性脑卒中恢复期患者太阳穴位注射复方樟柳碱对肌张力的影响.中国康复理论与实践,2010,16(3)：256-257.
[93]赵建华,方向延.运用Bobath技术抑制偏瘫患者上肢肌痉挛的疗效观察.[J].中国康复,2006,21(6)：432.
[94]翁浩,郭雪梅,刘畅.伸肘伸腕矫形器在治疗脑卒中后期偏瘫患者上肢痉挛中的应用.[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2007,22：78-79.
[95]徐庆中,谭文榜,尹彪中,等.颈脑脊神经解剖学研究及其后根选择性切断治疗痉挛性脑瘫[J].新疆医学,1990,24(1)：1-4
[96]王贵怀,张冰克,乔慧,等.痉挛性瘫痪的神经外科治疗功能性选择性神经后根切断术[J].中华神经外科杂志,2003,19(6)：436-439.
[97]郑重,马延山,桑林,等.选择性周围神经部分切断术治疗肢体痉挛的效果.中国全科医学,1997,14(12)：4205-4207
[98]查炜光,李安民,邰军利,等.脊神经部分切断联合肌腱延长治疗下肢痉挛型脑瘫.中国神经外科疾病研究杂志,2010,9(3)：222-224
[99]梁新强,蒋广元,宋星志,等.颈交感神经节后纤维束切断治疗痉挛性瘫痪.中国临床康复,2004,8(25)：5250-5251
[100]杨飞,章雪松,郭建等。腓神经运动支部分切断治疗脑瘫踝部痉挛46例[J].中国医学杂志,2007,5(1)：66.
[101]Van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Neurol Neurosury Psychiatry,2005,76(4):503-508
[102]郭俊.脑卒中治疗新进展.国外医学康复医学分册.1994,14(1)：4
[103]吴毅,安华,施桂珍,等.常规康复治疗结合神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中患者的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志.2004,19(1)：25-27
[104]周天健译.康复技术全书[M].北京：北京出版社,1989,788-800
[105]谢财忠.脑卒中康复的理论和方法.中国康复理论和实践.2002,8(11)：675
[106]27Hara Y, Yukihiro S, Ogawa, Y, et al. Hybrid Power-Assisted Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper-Extremity Function[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabi1,2006,85(12):977-985
[107]申茂玲,贾玉玲,中智慧.抗肢体痉挛康复模式在脑卒中偏瘫患者早期康复中的应用[J].中国护理杂志.2011,46(5)：473-475
[108]于永红.简易上肢屈肌痉挛抑制器在康复训练中的疗效观察.临床和实验医学杂志,2011,10(22)：1783-1784
[109]蔡华安,廖若夷,张雅珍,等.神经发育促进技术合针刺治疗脑卒中痉挛期30例[J].湖南中医杂志.2011,27(4)：65-66
[110]郭志玲.针药并举治疗中风痉挛瘫痪46例临床观察.针刺研究.2001,26(2)：131-132
[111]曾红文.组合针灸并自拟中药方改善脑卒中患者肢体痉挛状态和运动功能[J].辽宁中医杂志.2006,33(7)：875-876
[112]赵敏.针药结合治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究.河南中医药学刊.2002,17(3)：63-65
[113]吉学群.项针加腹针治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫疗效观察.中国针灸,2009,29(12)：961-965
[114]朱国祥,包烨华,纪晨彤,等.针灸结合中医湿热敷治疗中风后上肢高痉挛状态[J].针灸临床杂志.2004,20(6)：17-18
[115]刘艳萍,谢明,李慧,等.音乐干预结合运动疗法改善脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究[J].护士进修杂志,2009,24(9)：1585-1587.
[116]中华人民共和国卫生部医政司主编《中国康复医学诊疗规范》[M].北京：华夏出版社1999年12月.
[117]孙志波.温灸诱发循经高温线形态学和组织酶化学相关机制研究[J].针刺研究,2005,30(6)：102-108.
[118]谭连红,马春红,张栋,等.温灸家兔穴位后循经皮肤温度及组织Ca2+-、Mg2+-ATP酶活性的变化[J].针刺研究,2007,32(5)：330-333.
[119]陈孟勤,曹济民.血管活动的个性化[J].生理科学进展,1996,27(1)：203.
[120]何子安.与体温调节有关的多肽[J].生理科学进展,1985,16(1)：36.
[121]马春红,谭连红,赵湘杰,等.家兔循经组织不同温度改变对Na+/K+-ATP酶活性及P物质的影响[J].针刺研究,2002,27(3)：220-223.
[122]汤健,唐朝枢.循环系统的内分泌功能.北京：北京医科大学,协和医科大学联合出版社,1989,62-145.
[123]马春红,谭连红,赵湘杰,等.家兔循经温度变化与降钙素基因肽和血管紧张素Ⅱ含量的关系[J].针刺研究,2002,27(2)：149-151.
[124]孙世晓,武桂娟.滞针兼透刺疗法治疗中风肢体痉挛状态临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(6)：36-37.
[125]刘乃刚,郭长青.经筋实质阐释[J].江苏中医药,2001,42(8)：7-8.
[2]包华.尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗脑梗死研究[J].中国综合临床,2002,18(1)：55-56
[3]刘铭,王海萍,余曙光.针灸治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的研究进展[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(7)：54-56
[4]McGuke JR, Harvey RL The prevention and management of complieations after stroke [J].Phys Med Rehabil C lin N Am,1999,10:857-874
[5]王志静.脑卒中流行病学分析.中华流行病学杂志.2003,24(2)：73-74
[6]朱镛连主编.《神经病学神经康复学》.北京人民军医出版社.2001,321-322
[7]郭志玲.祛痰逐瘀法治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪36例临床观察.中国中医药信息杂志,2000,7(6)：57
[8]王民生.脑卒中偏瘫痉挛期的中医药辨证论治.北京中医药大学学报.2000,23(12)：75-76
[9]孙西庆.温阳熄风化痰法治疗中风病痉挛性偏瘫临床观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2010,8(1)：45.
[10]范刚启,张道斌,罗伟.针灸治疗中风病.[M].上海：第二军医大学出版社,2001：91-96.
[11]程金莲,王麟鹏,王少松,等.“王氏夹脊穴”逆针灸治疗对脑卒中偏瘫痉挛状态117例随机对照观察[J].北京中医,2007,26(8)：467-469.
[12]钟长明,林洪茂,刘庆芳,等.针刺与肌张力平衡促通法对中风偏瘫病人早期康复的作用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2001,16(3)：180.
[13]雷龙鸣,庞军,陈家兴,等.不同针刺方案对偏瘫早期康复作用的临床观察[J].中国针灸,2005,25(4)：233-236.
[14]范刚启,王辉,陶月玉,等.脑梗死患者上肢瘫针刺治疗方案的优选及其对内皮素的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2003,23(2)：102-104.
[15]王国书,俞昌德.颅体针结合治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪35例[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(8)：12-13
[16]王春玲,宋淑娟,徐慧荣等.头针及吸氧法治疗中风偏瘫的50例临床观察.针灸临床杂志.2002,18(4)：20-21
[17]吕慧青,遇永琴.针刺三阴经治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫60例分析[J].北京中医药大学学报.2001,24(4)：54-55
[18]汪凌圳.头皮针抽提法对脑血栓形成后偏瘫患肢不同部位肌力影响的临床研究.浙江中医杂志.2005,7：292-194
[19]王丽平,薄智云.薄氏腹针疗法临床体会[J].中国针灸.2004,24(3)：201
[20]祝晓忠.腹针治疗中风后肢体肌张力增高的临床研究[J].中国医师杂志,2006(增刊)：219-220
[21]周炜,王丽平.腹针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效观察[J].中国针灸.2005,25(11)：757-759
[22]岳增辉,刘伍立.筋经刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛及疗效评价研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志.2001,8(4)：85
[23]于学平,滕秀英.经筋刺法治疗中风上肢痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志.2004,20(4)：20-22
[24]徐永豪,王涛.透刺法治疗中风痉挛偏瘫40例疗效观察.宁夏医学院学报,1997,19(2)：90
[25]揭子慧.透针治疗中风后偏瘫痉挛状态的临床观察.天津中医药.2011,28(3)：199
[26]姜桂美,吴思平,贾超,等.不同刺激量针刺拮抗肌与主动肌治疗脑卒中痉挛性瘫痪的临床疗效观察.针灸临床杂志.2008,24(11)：1-3
[27]李红星,罗利敏,刘东坡,等.针刺拮抗肌腧穴治疗中风后肢体痉挛临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2011,30(4)：252-253
[28]郭泽新,汪润生.分部针刺治疗中风偏瘫痉挛68例临床研究[J].中国针灸,1995,(5)：7-8
[29]李月梅,江钢辉,李艳慧,等.针刺神经干穴位配合井穴麦粒灸治疗中风后肢体功能障碍50例疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2010,37(7)：1364-1365
[30]娄必丹,章薇,刘智,等.张力平衡法对脑卒中痉挛瘫痪患者血脂和血糖的调节作用[J].中国康复,2006,21(2)：81-82.
[31]王二争,夏清,谢宗亮,等.芒针透刺督脉配合生物刺激反馈治疗脑卒中痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究.安徽医学,2009,30(12)：1397-1399.
[32]王东升,王顺,尚艳杰,等.推针手法治疗中风后指过屈疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2008,31(4)：267-269.
[33]高志颖.电针跷脉穴治疗中风偏瘫下肢肌痉挛状态35例临床观察[J].中医药导报,2007,13(3)：53-55.
[34]金泽,李兆贤,王玉琳等.双针并刺治疗中风后上肢肌张力增高疗效观察.上海针灸杂志,2011,30(8)：529-531.
[35]王乡斌、何坚,李天骄,等.不同频率电针治疗脑卒中下肢痉挛患者最大等长收缩的表面肌电图研究.福建中医学院学报.2008,18(6)：40-42
[36]王英姿,何丽君,王纯强.电针拮抗肌穴位结合运动疗法治疗脑卒中后肌痉挛.中外医疗.2008,23：17-18
[37]房显辉,周鹏,周蔚华,等.温针治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2011,27(4)：50-51
[38]马素兰、冯玲媚.温针灸合谷、足三里治疗中风偏瘫疗效观察.辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(11)：1627-1628
[39]刘茂德,虢英存.头针结合小针刀治疗偏瘫性肩痛症[J].上海针灸杂志,2002,21(5)：33
[40]王桂芳.火针针刺拮抗肌治疗脑血管病肌痉挛疗效分析.中国康复医学杂志.2008,23(2)：163-164
[41]高天宇,梅富华,段文清,等.对火针治疗脑中风后上肢痉挛疗效的评价[J].内蒙古中医药.2005,5：7-8
[42]王森,刘洁.灯盏花穴位注射治疗脑卒中偏瘫后上肢痉挛30例临床研究.安徽中医临床杂志.2003,15(5)：393-394
[43]蒋再轶,韩国栋,冯建宏.血塞通注射液痉挛点注射治疗脑卒中后肢体痉挛22例临床研究.中医药导报.2011,17(11)：16-18
[44]苗广宇,徐国庆,等.针刺加十二井穴放血疗法缓解肢体痉挛的疗效观察[J].中国疗养医学,2006,15(5)：326-327.
[45]苗广宇,周立秋,等.浮针疗法治疗脑卒中后偏瘫痉挛状态150例.中国针灸,2009年增刊,7-8.
[46]马玲.针刺结合麦粒灸缓解中风偏瘫肌痉挛的疗效观察[J].广西中医药.2002,25(1)：41
[47]倪卫民,沈洁.刺络拔罐法对减低中风后上肢肌张力增高的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志.2004,23(7)：10.
[48]李思,张智龙(指导).张智龙教授治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态经验.陕西中医.2010,31(9)：1197-1198.
[49]柳迎春.“加味黄芪桂枝五物汤”治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪30例临床观察.江苏中医药杂志.2010,42(5)：31-33.
[50]谭爱玲,吕端.养阴柔肝通络法治疗缺血性中风后痉挛30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药杂志.2006,27(8)：24-25.
[51]陈党红,蔡业峰.舒筋颗粒对30例卒中后肌张力增高患者FM、BI的影响.新中医,2008,40(2)：43-44.
[52]魏岳斌,郝建军,黄伯梯,等.柔筋汤治疗脑卒中恢复期痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究.中国中医药现代远程教育,2011,9(7)：17-18
[53]谢仁明,陈红霞,王知非,等.中药浸浴及内服结合康复训练治疗中风后肢体痉挛60例[J].山东中医杂志,2011,30(1)：18-20
[54]董福生,丁玉庆,张文慧.脑卒中后肩手综合征的手法康复研究[J].中国康复理论与实践.2000,8(3)：162
[55]林森.中草药外用治疗中风后遗症临床探讨[J].中国民族民间医药.2011,(11)：82-83
[56]芦玉莲,陈文卫,张宇艳.中药熏洗治疗中风后患肢肿胀128例[J].实用中医内科学杂志.2007,21(2)：83
[57]中华人民共和国卫生部医政司主编.中国康复医学诊疗规范[M].北京：华夏出版社,1999.20.
[58]Delisa JA主编.南登昆,郭正成主译.康复医学理论与实践[M].第三版。西安：世界图书出版西安公司,2004.890-891.
[59]Brunnstroml. Movement Therapy in hemiplegia MI.New York. A NeuroPhysiological Approach harper and Row Publishers,1970;103-105
[60]Hallet M.The neurophysiogy of dystonia. Arch Neurol 1998,55(5):601-603
[61]岳增辉,袁建菱,姜京明.经筋论治脑卒中后痉挛状态及对脑脊液Glu. GABA的影响[J].中国针灸,2004,24(8)：565-567
[62]Barber BP, Vaughn JR. The origin, distruction and synaptic relationships of substance P axons in rat spinal cord [J].J Comp Neurol.1979,184 (2):331-351.
[63]钱书森,余晓英,徐承焘,等.辣椒素治疗截瘫后下肢肌肉紧张度增高的实验研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,1999,5(2)：57.
[64]Golanov EV.Reis DJ. Neuroprotextiveelectrical stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus attenuates expression of peri infarction depolarizing waves [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,1997,17:381.
[65]李平.针刺对脑梗塞模型大鼠海马游离氨基酸水平影响的实验研究[J].针灸研究,1998,23(4)：257-261.
[66]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议各类脑血管病诊断要点.中华神经科杂志.1996,29(6)：379-380.
[67]国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报.1996,19(1)：55-56
[68]王兴林,高继亭,郭燕梅.脑病变部位大小与Brunstrom偏瘫恢复阶段及痉挛程度的关系[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2003,25(2)：109-111.
[69]Miyai I Blau AD.Reding MJ,et al. Pations with stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to rehabilitation efforts, neurology,1997,48:95-101.
[70]Pantano P, Formisano R Ricci M, et al. Moror recovery after stroke, Morphological and functional brain alternations. Brain,1996,119:1849-1857.
[71]Shleton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke,2001,32:107-112.
[72]刘立荣.脑卒中患者康复期的心理护理[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(21)：196-197.
[73]冯亚青,李艳梅,王建华.脑卒中偏瘫患者两手皮肤温度的评测[J].现代康复,2001,5(3)：69.
[74]王茂斌.脑卒中的康复治疗[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2006,58-59.
[75]Ashwowth B. Practitioner.1964;192(3):540-542.
[76]Levin MF, Hui Chan CWY. Are Hand stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity[J]. Journal of Nerology.1993; 240:63-71.
[77]Levin MF, Hui Chan CWY. Ankle spasticity idinversely correlated with antagonist voluntary contraetion in hemiparetic subjeets[J]. Eleetromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology.1994; 34:415-425.
[78]甘森,肖卫民,陈仰昆.乙哌立松缓解脑卒中后肌张力增高：随机对照观察[J].中国临床康复.2004,13(8)：2412-2413
[79]Elovic E. Principles of pharmaceutical management of spastichypertonia. Phys Med RehabilClin N A m.2001,12:793-816
[80]秦绍森,张晓燕,罗盛,等.巴氯芬在中风后中期的临床应用研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志.2001,9(2)：93
[81]Bittiger H.Basic Aspects of Inhibitory Transmitter AminoAcidsin Spasticity and Painin Marsden CD (ED). Treating Spasticity Pharmacological Advances. Toronto:HansHu berPub,1998:20-30
[82]张自茂,张盘德.巴氯芬对偏瘫患者肢体功能恢复的影响.中国康复理论与实践,2004,10(8)：486-487
[83]姜秀芹,张克克,王从光,等.力奥来素在脑血管意外偏瘫痉挛期的应用.中原医刊.2003,30(1)：3-4
[84]Pinto O. Revriew of clinical trials with lieosesl in sump.Vienna,1971,197
[85]廖华薇.美多巴对卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的影响.海南医学.2007,18(5)：101
[86]赵铁成,赵铁英,董洪亮,等.郝智治疗脑卒中后肌张力增高的疗效观察.中国临床康复,2004,8(4)：705-715.
[87]廖华薇.美多巴对卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的影响.[J].海南医学,2007,18(5)：101-168.
[88]崔利华,张通.A型肉毒毒素在治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛中的应用[J].中国康复理论与实践.2005,11(9)：706-708
[89]赵艳茹,李长春,崔其福.A型肉毒毒素治疗对脑卒中患者下肢痉挛步态的改善效应.中国临床康复,2005,5(9)：4-5.
[90]刘小艳,付耀高,赵志华.重复注射A型肉毒毒素治疗卒中后上肢肌痉挛状态.广东医学,2006,27(11)：1744-1746
[91]李震宇,孙涛,华启海,等.两种方法注射A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后前臂肌痉挛疗效观察,2007,32(2)：192-193
[92]王征美,孙岚,房立岩.缺血性脑卒中恢复期患者太阳穴位注射复方樟柳碱对肌张力的影响.中国康复理论与实践,2010,16(3)：256-257.
[93]赵建华,方向延.运用Bobath技术抑制偏瘫患者上肢肌痉挛的疗效观察.[J].中国康复,2006,21(6)：432.
[94]翁浩,郭雪梅,刘畅.伸肘伸腕矫形器在治疗脑卒中后期偏瘫患者上肢痉挛中的应用.[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2007,22：78-79.
[95]徐庆中,谭文榜,尹彪中,等.颈脑脊神经解剖学研究及其后根选择性切断治疗痉挛性脑瘫[J].新疆医学,1990,24(1)：1-4
[96]王贵怀,张冰克,乔慧,等.痉挛性瘫痪的神经外科治疗功能性选择性神经后根切断术[J].中华神经外科杂志,2003,19(6)：436-439.
[97]郑重,马延山,桑林,等.选择性周围神经部分切断术治疗肢体痉挛的效果.中国全科医学,1997,14(12)：4205-4207
[98]查炜光,李安民,邰军利,等.脊神经部分切断联合肌腱延长治疗下肢痉挛型脑瘫.中国神经外科疾病研究杂志,2010,9(3)：222-224
[99]梁新强,蒋广元,宋星志,等.颈交感神经节后纤维束切断治疗痉挛性瘫痪.中国临床康复,2004,8(25)：5250-5251
[100]杨飞,章雪松,郭建等。腓神经运动支部分切断治疗脑瘫踝部痉挛46例[J].中国医学杂志,2007,5(1)：66.
[101]Van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Neurol Neurosury Psychiatry,2005,76(4):503-508
[102]郭俊.脑卒中治疗新进展.国外医学康复医学分册.1994,14(1)：4
[103]吴毅,安华,施桂珍,等.常规康复治疗结合神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中患者的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志.2004,19(1)：25-27
[104]周天健译.康复技术全书[M].北京：北京出版社,1989,788-800
[105]谢财忠.脑卒中康复的理论和方法.中国康复理论和实践.2002,8(11)：675
[106]27Hara Y, Yukihiro S, Ogawa, Y, et al. Hybrid Power-Assisted Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper-Extremity Function[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabi1,2006,85(12):977-985
[107]申茂玲,贾玉玲,中智慧.抗肢体痉挛康复模式在脑卒中偏瘫患者早期康复中的应用[J].中国护理杂志.2011,46(5)：473-475
[108]于永红.简易上肢屈肌痉挛抑制器在康复训练中的疗效观察.临床和实验医学杂志,2011,10(22)：1783-1784
[109]蔡华安,廖若夷,张雅珍,等.神经发育促进技术合针刺治疗脑卒中痉挛期30例[J].湖南中医杂志.2011,27(4)：65-66
[110]郭志玲.针药并举治疗中风痉挛瘫痪46例临床观察.针刺研究.2001,26(2)：131-132
[111]曾红文.组合针灸并自拟中药方改善脑卒中患者肢体痉挛状态和运动功能[J].辽宁中医杂志.2006,33(7)：875-876
[112]赵敏.针药结合治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究.河南中医药学刊.2002,17(3)：63-65
[113]吉学群.项针加腹针治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫疗效观察.中国针灸,2009,29(12)：961-965
[114]朱国祥,包烨华,纪晨彤,等.针灸结合中医湿热敷治疗中风后上肢高痉挛状态[J].针灸临床杂志.2004,20(6)：17-18
[115]刘艳萍,谢明,李慧,等.音乐干预结合运动疗法改善脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究[J].护士进修杂志,2009,24(9)：1585-1587.
[116]中华人民共和国卫生部医政司主编《中国康复医学诊疗规范》[M].北京：华夏出版社1999年12月.
[117]孙志波.温灸诱发循经高温线形态学和组织酶化学相关机制研究[J].针刺研究,2005,30(6)：102-108.
[118]谭连红,马春红,张栋,等.温灸家兔穴位后循经皮肤温度及组织Ca2+-、Mg2+-ATP酶活性的变化[J].针刺研究,2007,32(5)：330-333.
[119]陈孟勤,曹济民.血管活动的个性化[J].生理科学进展,1996,27(1)：203.
[120]何子安.与体温调节有关的多肽[J].生理科学进展,1985,16(1)：36.
[121]马春红,谭连红,赵湘杰,等.家兔循经组织不同温度改变对Na+/K+-ATP酶活性及P物质的影响[J].针刺研究,2002,27(3)：220-223.
[122]汤健,唐朝枢.循环系统的内分泌功能.北京：北京医科大学,协和医科大学联合出版社,1989,62-145.
[123]马春红,谭连红,赵湘杰,等.家兔循经温度变化与降钙素基因肽和血管紧张素Ⅱ含量的关系[J].针刺研究,2002,27(2)：149-151.
[124]孙世晓,武桂娟.滞针兼透刺疗法治疗中风肢体痉挛状态临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(6)：36-37.
[125]刘乃刚,郭长青.经筋实质阐释[J].江苏中医药,2001,42(8)：7-8.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |