用户名: 密码: 验证码:
城镇劳动力非正规就业选择研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着市场经济的转型,各种要素市场开始发育。劳动力市场发育一方面带来了新的就业机会,另一方面也摧毁了大量的传统就业岗位,市场调整的结果是就业正规性下降,非正规性上升,尤其是自1995年来,城镇非正规就业的增长率大大超过了全国城镇就业增长率。目前,据相关统计,非正规就业规模达到了1亿以上,已经超过了正规就业规模。
     非正规就业的发展引起了国内外学者的广泛关注,但大部分研究都更多的是基于非正规就业的贫困理论展开的,认为非正规就业是弱势群体在无法进入正规就业市场时的被迫选择,非正规就业等于低级市场的就业,从而忽略了劳动力非正规就业选择的自愿性以及非正规就业本身的合法性。本文利用微观数据,采用动态面板随机效应模型和多元logit模型对城镇居民和农民工非正规就业选择的机理进行了分类考察,在强调影响城镇劳动力非正规就业选择因素的同时,重新审视了非正规就业与劳动力市场分割之间的关系。此研究具有一定的现实和理论意义。本文的主要研究结论有:
     1、非正规就业并不等于低级就业,非正规就业规模扩张并不意味着城镇劳动力市场分割程度的持续恶化。统一的劳动力市场并不意味着非正规就业的消失,相反,一个完善、充分竞争的劳动市场,允许多种就业形式的存在,非正规就业是劳动力市场的重要组成部分.
     2、农民工就业市场内部出现了就业分流,主要表现为正规就业和非正规就业两大类。但是就业分流并没有使得农民工就业市场内部出现分层。农民工的非正规就业选择存在着强的自选择,低质量的社会保障是造成(在农民工内部市场上)农民工非正规就业选择的重要原因。
     3、与以往的研究结果类似,当把城镇居民和农民工置于相同的劳动力市场背景下时,农民工更多的从事了非正规就业。但是,即使同为缺乏法律监管的非正规就业,本文的数据也显示,农民工依然处在就业的弱势地位,城乡劳动力(非正规就业者)面对着不同的工资决定机制。因此,本文认为,城乡就业差异的制度根源在于农民工公民权力的缺失,而不是简单的归因于劳动力市场分割。农民工公民权缺失的修补是当前政府改变农民工就业弱势地位的根本所在。
     4、自雇佣非正规就业者大多面临着强的信贷约束,他们获取了更高的小时工资率,但却并没有较高的平均教育水平。同时,实证结果表明,城镇居民自雇佣非正规就业可能是某些劳动力群体的一种无奈选择,但农民工的自雇佣非正规就业选择却具有明显的自选择。
With the transition of market economy, various elements of market are developing. The development of labor market has brought new opportunities for employment, but also destroyed a large number of traditional jobs. One of the results of the market transition is that the formal employment declined and the informal employment rose.
     Especially since1995, the growth rate of the informal employment significantly exceeded the growth rate of the urban employment. At present, according to the relevant statistics, informal employment has reached more than1billion.
     The development of informal employment has attracted the attentions of scholars, but the most research of informal employment are based on the poverty theory, which hold point of view that informal employment is the vulnerable groups'helpless choice when they can't get the formal employment because of discrimination and so on, the informal sector is equal to the low-grade market. These researches ignored the workers'choosing informal jobs voluntarily and the legitimacy of informal employment. This article, using the micro data, studies the mechanism of labor'choosing the informal jobs by using the dynamic panel models, Which emphasizes the factors of influencing the workers'choosing the informal jobs and at the same time re-examines the relationship of the informal employment and the labor market segmentation. The research is of great practical and theoretical meaning and the main conclusions are as follows:
     1. The informal sector is not equal to the low-grade market and the labor market segmentation is also not deepened with the increase of the informal employment. Unified labor market does not mean the disappearance of informal employment, on the contrary, a perfect and competitive labor market allow a variety of employment form; informal employment is an important part of the labor market.
     2. The migrants'employments are made of informal employment and formal employment, but the split-flow of the migrants'employment doesn't result in the migrant labor market stratification. The informal employment exist strong self-choice, low quality of social security is the one of main reason for that results.
     3. Consistent with a previous study, When placing the urban residents and migrant workers in the same labor market background, migrant workers more engaged in informal employment. We think that the system root caused the difference of Urban-rural employment is the migrant workers lacking of civil rights rather than labor market segmentation. Therefore, repairing the migrant's civil rights is the fundamental of changing the migrant workers'weak position of employment.
     4. Most of self informal employment faces strong credit constraint. They get higher hourly wage rates, but not have the higher average education level. At the same time, for some labor groups of urban workers, the self informal employment may be of a helpless choice, but for migrant workers, the choosing of informal employment has obvious self selection.
引文
①第十五次国际劳工大会的统计决议[R],日内瓦,2003年,转引自任远:《中国非正规就业发展报告》,重庆出版社,2006年
    [1]Banerjee, B., The role of the informal sector in the migration process:a test of probabilistic migration models and labour market segmentation for India [J]. Oxford Economic Papers,1983,35,399-422.
    [2]Bluestone, B., William, M.M & Stevenson. M, Low Wages and the Working Poor. Ann Arbor, Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations [M], University of Michigan—Wayne State University,1973.
    [3]Biswajit & Banerjee.The Role of the Informal Sector in the Migration Process:A Test of Probabilistic Migration Models and Labor Market Segmentation for India [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, New Seris,1983,35(3).399-422
    [4]Brubaker, R.,Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany [M]. Cambridge. Mass.:Harvard University Press,1992
    [5]Barbalet, J.M.. citizenship[M], Milton Keynes:Open University Press,.1988
    [6]Castells, Manuel & Portes, World Underneath:The Origins, Dynamics, and Effects of the Informal Economy. In A. Portes, M. Castells& L. A. Benton, eds., The Informal Economy:Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1989 [转引自 Borgatta & Montgomery,2000].
    [7]Cain,G, The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory [J], Journal of Economic Literature,1976,14(4),1215-1257.
    [8]Dunlop, J.T., the task of contemporary wage theory,In Taylor,W.and Pierson,F.C., new concepts in wage discrimination[J]., New York:McGraw-Hill.1957,117-139
    [9]Doeringer,P. B. & Piore, M. J., Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis[M], Lexington:Lexington Books,1971
    [10]Dong & Bowles, Gender Segmentation at Work in China's Privatized Rural Industry: Some evidence from Shandong and Jiangsu[J], World Development,2003.32(6) 979-998.
    [11]Funkhouser, E.,The urban informal sector in Central America:Household survey evidence[J]. World Development,1996,24(11),1737-1751
    [12]Fan,C.Crural-urban migration and gender division of labor in transitional china[J]. International journal of urban and regional research,2003.27(1),24-47.
    [13]Fields. G. S., Rural-urban migration, urban unemployment and underemployment, and job search activity in LDC's[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1975(2),165-187.
    [14]Gordon, D.M., Edwards, R., Reich, M.,Segmented Work, Divided Workers:The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1972
    [15]Gong, X.D. & Soest, A.V.,Wage Differential and Mobility in the Urban Labor Market: a Panel Data Analysis for Mexico[J],Labor Economics,2002,9(4),513-529.
    [16]Hart, K. Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana[J]. Journal of Modemrn African Studies,1973,11,61-89
    [17]Hildebrand, G. H, External influences and the determination of the internal wage structure, in:J. L. Meij, ed., Internal Wage Structure[M]. Amsterdam:North Holland, 1963
    [18]Heckman, J.J. & Hotz, V., An investigation of labor market earnings of Panamanian males[J]. Journal of Human Resources,1986,21,507-542
    [19]Hare, Denise,"push" versus'pull' Factors in Migration outflows and Returns: Determinants of Migration Status and Spell Duration among China's Rural Population[J].journal of Develpoment Studies.1999.35(3),45-72
    [20]Heckman, J.J.,Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data, in C.F.Manski & D.McFadden(eds.).Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications[M], Cambridge:The MIT Press,1981, 114-178.
    [21]Heckman. J.J.,The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating A Discrete Time-Discrtet Data Stochastic Process.in C.F.Manski & D.McFadden(eds.).Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications[M],Cambridge:The MIT Press,1981,179-195.
    [22]Kerr,c., The balkanization of labour markets, E.W.et al.,labour mobility and economic opportunity Cambridge [J], Mass:Technology press of M.I.T.1954,92-110.
    [23]Kalleberg, A. L., Wallace, M & Althauser, R.P., Economic segmentation, worker power, and income inequality[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1981
    [24]Krstic'& Sanfey, Mobility, poverty and well-being among the informally employed in Bosnia and Herzegovina[J],Economic Systems.2007,31,311-335
    [25]Knight, J. S. & Huabin,J.,Chinese rural migrations in urban enterprises:three perspectives[J],journol of development studies,1999,35(3),73-104
    [26]Light, Ivan.Ethnic Enterprise in America:Business andWel-fare among Chinese, Japanese, and Blacks,Berkeley[M]:California:University of California Press,1972.
    [27]Livernash, E. R.,The internal wage structure, in:G. W. Taylor and F. C. Pierson, eds., Newconcepts in wage determination[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill.,1957
    [28]Livingstone, I.,A reassessment of Kenya's rural and urbaninformal sector[J]. World Development.1991,19(6),651-670.
    [29]Mazumdar, D.,The urban informal sector[J]. World Development,1976,4(8),655-679.
    [30]Mingione, Fragmented Societies:A Sociology of Economic Life Beyond the Market Paradigm[M].Cambridge:Mass.:Basil Blackwel,1991[转引自 Borgatta & Montgomery, 2000].
    [31]Maloney, W.F., Does informality imply segmentation in urban labor markets? Evidence from sectoral transitions in Mexico[J].The World Bank Economic Review, 1999.13,275-302.
    [32]Magnac,T.,Segmented or competitive labor markets [J],Econometrica,1991.59, 165-187.
    [33]Marcouiller.Castilla & Woodruff.Formal Measures of the Informal-Sector Wage Gap in Mexico, El Salvador, and Peru [J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1997,45(2),367-392
    [34]Marcoullier, D.. Ruiz de Casilla. V. & Woodruff, C. Formal measures of the informal-sector wage gap in Mexico, El Salvador, and Peru[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1997,45(2),367-392.
    [35]Meehan. E.Citizenship and the European Community [M],London:Sage Publication. 1993
    [36]Merrick. T. W.,Employment and earnings in the informal sector in Brazil:the case of Belo Horizonte[J]. Journal of Developing Areas,1976.10(3).337-353.
    [37]Portes A.The InformalEconomy and Its Paradoxes. InN. Smelser, J.& Swedberg,R.editors.The Handbook of Economic Sociology[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1994
    [38]Portes, A., Blitzner, S.. & Curtis, J..The urban informal sector in Uruguay:Its internal structure, characteristics, and effects[J]. World Development,1986.14(6),727-741.
    [39]Piore, M.J. Notes for a theory of labor market stratification. In:Edwards. R.C., Reich, M.. Gordon, D.M. (Eds.), Labor Market Segmentation. Heath and Company[J], Lexington, MA, DC,1975.125-150.
    [40]Pradhan, M. & Van Soest, A.,Formal and informal sector employment in urban areas of Bolivia[J]. Labor Economics,1995,2,275-297
    [41]Pratap, S.& Quintin, E., Are labor markets segmented in developing countries? A semiparametric approach [J]. European Economic Review, forthcoming.2004.
    [42]Ross, A. M., Do we have a new industrial feudalism? [J], American Economic Review, 1958
    [43]Reich, M., The economics of racism. In:Gordon, D. (Ed.), Problems in Political Economy. Heath and Company[M], Lexington, MA, DC,1971
    [44]Ray, D.,Development Economics[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, NJ.1998
    [45]Saavedra, J., & Chong, A.Structural reform, institutions and earnings:Evidence from the formal and informal sectors in urban Peru[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 1999.35(4).:95-116.
    [46]Soysal,Y.N., Limits of Citizenship:Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1994
    [47]Solinger, D.J., contesting citizenship in urban china:peasant migrants, the state, and the logic of the market[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press.1999
    [48]Shorter.J.,Social individuality versus possessive individualism:the sounds of silence[M], London:Deconstructing social psychology.1990
    [49]Turner.B.S..Citizenship and capitalism:the debate over Rrfromism[M]. London:Allen and Unwin,1986
    [50]Turner,B.S. outline of a theory of citizenship[J], Socilolgy A990,24(2) 189-217
    [51]Wang. Maruyama,A.. & Kikuch.M., rural-urban migration and labor markets in china: a case study in a northeastern Province[J].The development economics.2000.38(1): 80-104.
    [52]Zveren & Polany, Chayanov, and Lessons for the Study of the Informal Sector[J], Journal of Economic Issues.Lincoln,2005,39(3):765.
    [53]波兰尼(Polanyi),巨变:当代政治、经济的起源[M],黄树民等译,远流出版事业股份有限公司,1994.
    [54]蔡防,中国就业制度的回顾和思考[J],理论前沿,2008(11).5-8.
    [55]蔡昉、都阳、王美艳,劳动力流动的政治经济学[M],上海三联出版社,2003.
    [56]蔡肪、王美艳:非正规就业与劳动力市场发展——解决中国城镇就业增长[J],经济学动态,2004(2),24-28.
    [57]蔡防,中国就业统计的一致性:事实与政策涵义[J],中国人口科学,2004(3),2-10.
    [58]陈映芳,“农民工”:制度安排与身份认同[J],社会学研究,2005(3),119-244.
    [59]方文超,进城民工与非正规就业研究[D],浙江大学,2004,44-67.
    [60]国际劳动局,世界就业报告2001年[M],中国劳动力社会保障出版社,2002.
    [61]国际劳工局,世界就业报告1998-1999[M],中国劳动社会保障出版社,2000.
    [62]关艳丽,我国城镇弱势群体的非正规就业问题探讨[J],沿海企业与科技,2006(4),195-196.
    [63]胡鞍钢、赵黎,我国转型期非正规就业与非正规经济(1990-2004)[J],清华大学学报,2006(3).111-119.
    [64]胡凤霞、姚先国,农民工非正规就业选择研究[J],人口与经济,2011(4),23-28
    [65]胡凤霞、姚先国,城镇居民非正规就业选择与劳动力市场分割——一个面板数据的实证分析[J],浙江大学学报(人为社科版),2011(2),191-199
    [66]何平,中国社会保障体系研究报告[J],社会保障问题研究,2001,62-72.
    [67]郜风涛,中国经济转型期就业制度的回顾和评析[J],研究探索,2009(2),14-16.
    [68]金一虹,女性非正规就业:现状与对策[J],河海大学学报,2006(1),6-10.
    [69]京劳社办发,北京市外地农民工参加基本医疗保险暂行办法,http://www.legalinfo.gov.cn/zt/2004-09/06/content_131075.htm.2004,101号文件.
    [70]京劳社办发,北京市农民工养老保险暂行办法,http://www.lawtime.cn/article/11132480303253124oo215482001,125号文件.
    [71]李培林,当前我国就业形势的特点和变化[J],社会科学研究,2009(2),97-103.
    [72]李强、唐壮,城市农民工与城市中的非正规就业[J],社会学研究,2002(6),13-25.
    [73]刘妍、李岳云,城市外来农村劳动力非正规就业的性别差异分析[J],中国农村经济,2007(12),20-27.
    [74]刘燕斌,面向新世纪的全球就业[M],中国劳动力保障出版社,2000.
    [75]刘祖元,从传统到现代-当代中国社会转型研究[M],湖北人民出版社,2000.
    [76]李义波、朱考金:农民工融合度主观认知状况:身份认同、城市归属与发展规划——以江苏省1085名农民工为例[J],南京农业大学学报,2010(1),96-101
    [77]潘泽泉,国家调整农民工政策的过程分析:理论判断与政策思路[J],理论与改革,2008(5).
    [78]任远、彭希哲,中国非正规就业发展报告[M],重庆出版社,2006.
    [79]苏黛瑞,在中国城市中争取公民权:农民流动者、国家和市场逻辑[M],浙江人民出版社,2009.
    [80]石美遐,我国非正规就业劳动关系调整模式研究[J],中国劳动,2007(11),22-24.
    [81]上海市人民政府,上海市外来从业人员综合保险暂行办法http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/node2314/node3124/node3125/node3129/usero biect6ai1130.html,2002,123号文件
    [82]陶家俊,身份认同论[J],外国文学,2004(2),37-44.
    [83]谭琳、李军锋,我国非正规就业的性别特征分析[J],人口研究,2003(5),11-18.
    [84]唐灿、冯小双,“河南村”流动农民的分化[J],社会学研究,2000(4),72-85.
    [85]吴要武,蔡昉,中国城镇非正规就业:规模与特征[J],中国劳动经济学,2006(2),67-84.
    [86]王诚,中国就业转型:从隐蔽性失业、就业不足到效率性就业[J],经济研究,1996(5),38-46
    [87]王桂新等,小城镇外来劳动力基本状况及对小城镇发展影响分析——以浙江省柯桥、柳市两镇为例[J],人口学刊,2002(3),3-8.
    [88]王汉生等,“浙江村”:中国农民进入城市的一种独特方式[J],社会学研究,1997(1),56-67.
    [89]王小章,走向承认:浙江省城市农民工公民权发展的社会学研究[M],浙江大学出版社,2010.
    [90]万向东,农民工非正式就业的进入条件和效果[J],管理世界,2008(1),150-170.
    [91]万向东,农民工非正式就业研究的回顾和展望[J],中山大学学报,2009(1),63-74.
    [92]徐林清,中国劳动力市场分割问题研究,经济科学出版社[M],2006.
    [93]徐林清,劳动力市场分割对农村劳动供给行为的影响分析[J],经济体制改革,2008(3),36-39.
    [94]肖文韬,劳动力市场分割理论综述及缔约视角的思考[J],人口与经济,2006(6),41-50.
    [95]姚先国,陈凌,试论劳动力市场的供给管理[J],管理世界,1997(6),174-182.
    [96]姚先国、胡凤霞,中国农村女性劳动力流动研究问题综述[J],生产力研究,2009(17),189-192
    [97]姚先国,郭继强.论劳动力产权[J],学术月刊,1996(6),44-47.
    [98]姚先国,比较经济体制分析[M],浙江大学出版社,1999.
    [99]姚先国,经济增长方式转换的制度条件[J],浙江大学劳动保障和公共政策研究中心工作论文,2005.
    [100]姚先国、张俊森,中国人力资本投资与劳动力市场管理研究[M],中国劳动社会保障出版社,2010.
    [101]姚先国,劳动力产权与劳动力市场[M],浙江大学出版社,2006.
    [102]袁志刚、陆铭,隐性失业论[M],立信出版社,1998.
    [103]杨云颜,外来劳动力对本地劳动力市场的影响[J],中国人口科学,2001(2).
    [104]朱力,论农民工阶层的城市适应[J],江海学刊,2002(6).
    [105]褚松燕,公民资格的内涵辨析[J],中共福建省委党校学报,2005(8),107-111
    [106]周敏,美国华人社会的变迁[M],三联书店,2006.
    [107]张展新,劳动力市场的产业分割与劳动人口流动[J],中国人口科学,2004(2),45-80.
    [108]张彦,社会转型期城市非正规就业政策调整和制度创新研究[J],科学发展,2010(1),47-59.
    [109]中国社科院“中国社会状况综合调查”课题组:当前我国就业形势的特点和变化[J],社会科学研究,2009(2),97-103.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700