用户名: 密码: 验证码:
龙门山前缘大圆包地区构造特征及成藏条件
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
我国中西部前陆盆地勘探显示其油气资源丰富,但是油气探明率较低。新方法、新技术的研究应用是加快前陆冲断带复杂构造地区油气勘探的重要手段。为克服前陆冲断带地震资料品质较差的限制,本文探讨应用断层相关褶皱理论、野外地质调查、钻测井资料联合约束地震构造解释和建模进行综合研究分析。本论文为探索川西前陆冲断带海相油气勘探方法,以大圆包地区为研究对象,根据“源盖控区、储层控层和圈闭控位”的勘探思路,运用地质-地球物理-地球化学相结合的手段,研究烃源岩的发育分布和油气的保存条件,确定有利勘探地区(源盖控区),研究勘探区内据优质储层的发育层系确定天然气的主要分布层系(储层控层),研究圈闭的发育特征确定气藏的存在部位(圈闭控位)。重点探讨研究了用于前陆冲断带复杂构造解释和建模技术方法的改进和应用。
     大圆包地区位于川西复合前陆盆地龙门山推覆造山带前缘,构造主要受控于通济场断层、关口断层、彭县断层三条区域性断层。关口断裂为安县—都江堰断裂向南部的延伸,为北西倾,断面上陡下缓呈犁式,地面无大的断距出露,且褶皱前翼倾角近于直立。由断层相关褶皱分析,关口断层末端形成构造三角楔,由于断层插入过程中顶部反向逆冲断层上盘地层褶皱诱发而成。关口断裂上盘的通济断裂形成最晚、强度大,将老地层推至地表。根据地震资料确定,主要正向构造带为位于通济场断层与关口断层之间的断褶构造带,发育大圆包构造。
     构造地质建模主要依靠建立地表地质剖面,地震地质层位标定解释和构造几何学建模与运动学分析。在地震资料解释过程中,将地震数据转换为地震图像,对地震图像进行地震断层解释,不依赖于原始地震数据体,并且可以将图像处理技术用于叠后地震资料解释。研究改进偏微分扩散方程图像增强算法,针对三维地震图像特征,改进图像结构张量提取方法,应用GPU (Graphic Process Unit)加速计算实现提取三维地震图像的三维结构张量,由结构张量导向进行图像扩散滤波增强预处理,实现三维地震图像降噪、横向分辨率提高、同相轴连续性增强和构造信息突出。通过GPU计算和CPU计算性能对比结果可以看出,应用GPU计算可以满足三维地震图像处理需求,有助于提高地震解释客观性和工作效率。
     通过训练神经网络对多种地震属性进行分类识别三维地震不连续体,用于辅助构造解释,结合地质资料和钻测井资料落实了大圆包地区多次滑脱构造特征。大圆包构造主体为二、三叠系。从白水河、通济场至关口一带须家河组内部的变形和断裂情况分析,白水河至思文场一带出露的须家河组属印支期推覆构造的上盘逆掩岩席,其前锋在晚三叠世末期已经出露地表,后被白田坝组覆盖。再从大圆包构造后翼印支期推覆断层面的后期改造形态,结合地面彭县向峨附近彭灌断裂下盘侏罗系的地面构造展布形态来看,该构造的性质应属早喜马拉雅期发育的二叠系断层转折褶皱。
     通过烃源条件分析,四川盆地海相领域主要烃源岩为下寒武统、下志留统、下二叠统和上二叠统烃源岩。陡山沱组和上二叠统煤系烃源对于龙门山前缘的贡献并不大,而下志留统烃源在川西地区缺失。因此,对龙门山前缘具有重要贡献的烃源层系应是下寒武统。
     通过流体特征分析显示,盆山结合部的冲断带内,流体呈活塞式向前陆盆地内渐展式侧向迁移,流体并未形成大规模侧向运移的趋势。冲断带内主滑面以下的地层相对于主滑面以上的冲断岩片具有相对较好的保存条件。前陆隆起区曾经有过石油和天然气的聚集与成藏,先后形成了古油藏、古气藏。形成古油藏与古气藏时,区域内具备保存条件;在印支-燕山期古油藏转变为古气藏,并且形成水溶性气藏;燕山末-喜马拉雅期,形成前陆隆起区古气藏的破坏、调整和重新成藏。
     通过中三叠统沉积演化研究其储层特征,传统中三叠统油气勘探重点关注的是台内滩发育的优质储层,LS1井T2l4和T2l3钙质海绵的发现,预示雷口坡组还有可能存在礁滩组合形成的优质储层,确定T2l3为研究目的层。
     通过地球物理方法对雷口坡组顶部膏岩研究分析,认为大圆包构造保存条件受到断层作用破坏,使得油气未能成藏。同时,预测关口断层下盘隐伏构造为有利勘探方向。
In foreland basins of Central and West China, the exploration shows there is rich in hydrocarbon and has a lower rate of proven resources. The study of new method and the application of new technology, which are important to speed up the exploration of the complex tectonic belt in the foreland thrust belt. This paper discusses the seismic modeling for structural analysis of the foreland thrust belt in west Sichuan. Based on study of the Dayuanbao area, the hydrocarbon exploration methods is mapping source rocks and researching the hydrocarbon preservation conditions to determine favorable areas for oil and gas exploration, mapping the distribution of the high-quality reservoirs assemblage to determine the gas distribution layer, studying the trap development characteristics to determine the location of the gas reservoirs. At the same time, this paper focuses on the seismic modeling using3D seismic image and seismic attributes, and applied geophysical methods combination with the geological means for exploration of Dayuanbao area.
     Dayuanbao area is in the front of the Longmen mountains thrust belt, western Sichuan foreland basin. The main structure controlled by Tongjichang fault, Guankou fault and Penxian fault. Guankou fault is the extending southward of the Anxian-Dujiangyan fault, it is a northwestward plow fault, and within a thrust wedge tectonics at the fault terminal. Tongjichang fault is formed late and thrust to the ground. Based on the seismic images, the Dayuanbao structure is a positive structure between Tongjichang fault and Guankou fault.
     Seismic modeling relies on formed the surface geological sections, Seismic interpretation, geometry modeling and kinematics analysis of the tectonic. Seismic interpretation from3D seismic image volume, which can be processed without changing the original data, is more convenient. The volume of3D seismic image enables to enhancing process and then interprets directly. Based on PDE, eigenvalue analysis and edge detection, the faults of3D seismic image volume were interpreted with the computations accelerate with GPU (Graphic Process Unit) implementation. The practical application result shows that this method can effectively improve the objectivity and efficiency of the interpretation of3D seismic data.
     Neural Network Classification of multi-seismic attributes used to faults detection, which can help quick structure interpretation. Then, multiple detachment structure of the Dayuanbao was ascertained by geological and geophysical files. The main strata of Dayuanbao structure are the Permian and the Triassic. According to the research of the deformation and fracture of the Xujiahe formation from Tongjichang to Guankou, the outcrops of Xujiahe formation at Siwenchang and Baishuihe, it is belong to the hanging side of thrust sheet, and thrust to exposure in late Triassic period, then covered by Baitianba formation. It shows that the Dayuanbao structure is a fault-bend fold of Permian system in he early stage of Himalayan, which analyzed by the reconstruction form of the back limb of Dayuanbao and the spread pattern of the ground structure in Penxian area.
     Through the analysis of hydrocarbon source condition, the main hydrocarbon source of the marine strata in Sichuan basin, which are lower Cambrian, lower Silurian, lower Permian and upper Permian. The hydrocarbon source of the Doushantuo and upper Permian is less contribute to the front of Longmen mountains, moreover, the lower Silurian hydrocarbon source is deletion in west Sichuan. So, the main hydrocarbon source contribution to the front of the Longmen mountains should be lower Cambrian.
     The study of fluid characteristics shows that the fluid is gradually lateral migration from the combination of basin and mountain to the foreland basin. The lateral migration of the fluid is not a large-scale trend. There is better preservation conditions below the thrust belt compared with the thrust microlithon above the sliding plane. In foreland uplift area, there have been hydrocarbon gathering and accumulation, and has formed paleo-reservoir and paleo-gas-reservoir. At the same time, there were good preservation conditions. In the process of transforming paleo-reservoir into paleo-gas-reservoir between Indochina to Yanshanian, some pyrolysis gas dissolved into water and then formed water-soluble gas. The tectonic uplift occurred from late Yanshanian to Himalayan, which lead to the damage, adjustment and re-accumulation of the paleo-gas-reservoir.
     According to the reservoir characteristics of Middle Triassic sedimentary evolution, and the discovery of calcareous sponge in leikoupo formations, which indicate the T213is the target layer. By geophysical methods analysis of the gypsum in Leikoupo, it can be considered that the preservation conditions are destroyed which is the reason of failing to form reservoir. Then further study shows the prospective exploration area at the buried structure below the Guankou fault.
引文
[1]Admasu F, Back S, Toennies K. Autotracking of faults on 3D seismic data[J]. Geophysics,2006,71 (6):A49-A53.
    [2]Al-Dossary S,Simon Y, Marifurt K. Inter Azimuth Coherence Attribute for Fracture Detection[J].SEG Technlcal Program Expanded Abstraets,2004,23:183-186
    [3]Allmendinger R. Inverse and forward numerical modeling of trishear fault-propagation folds [J]. Tectonics,1998,17(4):640-656.
    [4]Alvarez L,Guichard F,Lions PL,et.al.Axions and Fundamental Equations of Image Processing[J].Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis,1993,16(9):200-257.
    [5]Arne D,Worley B,Wilson C,et al.Differential exhumation in response to episodic thrusting along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J].Tectonophysics,1997,280(3/4):239-256.
    [6]Bahorich M, Farmer S.3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features;the coherence cube[J]. The Leading Edge,1995,14(10):1053-1058.
    [7]Bakker P. Image structure analysis for seismic interpretation[D]. Delft Holland:technisch Universiteit,2002.
    [8]Banner J L, Kaufman J. The isotopic record of Ocean chemistry and diagenesis preserved in nonlumineseent brachiopods from Mississippian carbonate rocks Illinois and Missouri[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,1994,106:1074-1082.
    [9]Beaumont C.Foreland basins[J].Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society,1981,65(2):291-329.
    [10]Bergbauer S, Mukerji T, Hennings P. Improving curvature analyses of deformed horizons using scale-dependent filtering techniques[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(8):1255-1272.
    [11]Brunton F R, Dixon O A. Siliceous Sponge-microbe Biotic Associations and Their Recurrence through the Phanerozoic as Reef Mound Constructors [J]. Palaios,1994,9: 370-387.
    [12]Burbank D W, Anderson R S. Tectonic Geomorphology[M]. Blackwell Science,2001.
    [13]Burbank D W, Raynolds R G H. Stratigraphic keys to the timing of thrusting in terrestrial foreland basins; Applications to the northwestern Himalaya, in Kleinspehn K L and Paola, Chris, eds, New perspectives in basin analysis[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1988: 331-351.
    [14]Burbank D W. Decoupling of erosion and precipitation in Himalayas[J].Nature,2003, 426:652-655.
    [15]Burchfiel B C, Chen Z, Liu Y et al. Tectonics of the Longmen Shan and adjacent regions Tectonics of the Longmen Shan and adjacent regions[J]. International Geology Review,1995, 37:661-735.
    [16]Burchfiel B C, Royden L H, van der Hilst R D. A geological and geophysical context for the Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008, Sichuan, People's Republic of China[J]. GSA Today.,2008,18(7):4-11.
    [17]Burchfiel B C. Structural geology of the Earth's exterior[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.1979,76(9):4201-4207.
    [18]Catte F,et al Image selective smoothing and edge-detection by nonlinear diffusion[J].SIAM Joumal on Numerical Analysis.1992,29(1):182-193.
    [19]Chen S,Wilson C J L, Luo Z. et al. The evolution of the Western Sichuan Foreland Basin[J], SW China. J. SE Asian Earth Sci,1994,10:159-168.
    [20]Chen S F, Wilson C J L. Emplacement of the Longmen Shan Thrust-Nappe Belt,long the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1996,18(4): 413-430.
    [21]Chen Shefa, Wilson C J L. Emplacement of the Longmen Shan Thrust-Nappe Belt along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1996,18(4):413-430.
    [22]Chopra S, Marfurt K Curvature attribute applications to 3D surface seismic data[J].The Leading Edge,2007,26(4):404-414.
    [23]Chopra S, Marfurt K. Volumetric curvature attributes for fault/fracture characterization[J]. First Break,2007,25(7):35-46.
    [24]Chopra S, Marfurt K.Seismic attributes-A historical perspective[J]. Geophysics,2005,70(5):3SO-28SO.
    [25]Chopra S. Emerging and future trends in seismic attributes [J]. The Leading Edge,2008, 27(3):298-318.
    [26]Dahlstrom CDA. Geomet ric const raints derived from the law of conservation volume and applied to evolutionary models for detachment folding [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990,74:336-344.
    [27]Denison R E, Koepick R B, Burkew H, et al. Construction of the Cambrian and Ordovician seawater 87Sr/86 Sr curve[J]. Chem Geol,1998,152:325-340
    [28]Densmore A L, Elis M A, Li Y, et al.2007. Active tectonics of the Beichuan and Pengguan faults at the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau. Tectonics,26, TC4005, doi:10. 1029/2006 TC001987.
    [29]Dhont D, Luxey P, Chorowicz J.3-D modeling of geologic maps from surfacedata[J]. AAPG, 2005,89(11):1465-1474.
    [30]Dirks P H, Wilson C.J.L, Chen S., et al. Tectonic evolution of the NE margin of the Tibetan Plateau:evidence from the central Longmen Mountains, Sichuan Province, China. J. SE Asian Earth Sci[M],1994,9,181-192.
    [31]Dowd PA, Pardo-Ig u zquiza E. Estimating the boundary surface between geologic formations from 3D seismic data using neural networks and geostatistics [J]. Geophysics, 2005,70(1):P1-P11.
    [32]Epard JL, Groshong RH. Kinematic model of detachment folding including limbrotation, fixed hinges and layerparallel strain[J]. Tectonophysics,1995,247:85-103.
    [33]Erslev EA. Trishear fault propagation folding[J]. Geology,1991,19:617-620.
    [34]Faure G. Principles of Isotope Geology[M]. New York:John Wiley Sons.1997:97-146.
    [35]Flemings PB,Jordan TE. A synthetic stratigraphic model of foreland basin development[J]. Journal of Geophysical,1989,94(B4):3851-3866.
    [36]Gao DL. Application of three-dimensional seismic texture analysis with special reference to deep-marine facies discrimination and interpretation:Offshore Angola, west Africa[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(12):1665-1683.
    [37]Gao DL. Latest developments in seismic texture analysis for subsurface structure, facies, and reservoir characterization:A review[J]. Geophysics,2011,76(2):W1-W13.
    [38]Gersztenkorn A,Marfurt K.Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aid to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping[J]. Geophysics,1999,64(5):1468-1479.
    [39]Groot PD,Ligtenberg H.Oldenziel T,et.al.Examples of multi-attribute,neural network-based seismic object detection[J]. Geological Society London Memoir,2004,29(1):335-338;
    [40]Hardy S, Ford M.Numerical modeling of t rishear fault propagation folding[J]. Tectonics, 1997,16(5):841-854.
    [41]Harrowfield M J,Wilson C J L.Indosinian deformation of the Songpan Garze Fold Belt,northeast Tibetan Plateau [J] Journal of Structural Geology,2005,27(1):101-117.
    [42]Hesthammer J. Improving seismic data for detailed structural interpretation[J].The Leading Edge,1999,18(2):226-247.
    [43]Heydari E, Porosity loss. Fluid flow and mass transfer in limestone reservoirs application to the upper Jurassic Smackover formation [M]. Mississippi. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(1):100-118.
    [44]Homza TX,Wallace WK. Geometric and kinematic models for detachment folds with fixed and variable detachment depths[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1995,17:575-588.
    [45]Hubbard J, Shaw J H. Uplift of the Longmen Shan and Tibetan plateau, and the 2008 Wenchuan (M=7.9) earthquake [J]. Nature,2008,458(12):194-197.
    [46]Jia Dong, Wei Guoqi, Chen Zhuxin, et al. Longmen Shan fold-thrust belt and its relation to western Sichuan Basin in central China:New insights from hydrocarbon exploration [J]. AAPG, 2008,90(9):1425-1447.
    [47]Jia Dong, Wei Guoqi, Chen Zhuxin, et al. Longmen Shan fold-thrust belt and its relation to the western Sichuan Basin in central China:New insights from hydrocarbon exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(9):1425-1447.
    [48]Key SC,Nielsen HH.Fault and fracture classification using artifical neural networks-Case study from the Ekofisk field[J]. SEG Expanded Abstracts,1997,16:623-626.
    [49]Li Yong, Allen Philip A, Densmore Alexander L,et.al. Geological evolution of the Longmen Shan foreland basin (western Sichuan,China)during the Late Triassic Indosinian Orogeny[J]. Basin Research.2008,15:117-136
    [50]Li Yong, Ellis M, Densmore A, et al. Evidence for active strike-slip faults in the Longmen Shan,Eastern margin of Tibet[J]. EOS Transactions of American Geophysical Union,2001, 82(47):1104.
    [51]Li Yong, Ellis M, Densmore A. et al. Active Tectonics in the Longmen Shan region, Eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. EOS Transactions of American Geophysical Union,2000,81(48):1109.
    [52]Liu Shugen, Luo Zhili, Dai Sulan et al. The uplift of the Longmenshan thrust belt and subsidence of the West Sichuan foreland basin[J]. Acta Geological Sinica (English Edition), 2000,9:16-26.
    [53]Liu Shugen, Wang Hua, Sun Wei, Wang Guozhi, Xu Guosheng, Yuan Haifeng. Energy field adjustment and hydrocarbon phase evolution in Sinian-lower Paleozoic[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences,2008,19(6):700-706
    [54]Liu Shugen,Luo Zhili,Dai Sulan.The uplift of the Longmenshan thrust belt and subsidence of the west Sichuan Foreland Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,1996,9(1):16-26.
    [55]Macqueen R. W., Leckie D. A. Foreland basins and fold belts[J]. AAPG, Memoir(??), 1992,55:193-227.
    [56]Marfurt A, Kirlin R L.3-D broad-band estimates of reflector dip and amplitude[J].Geophysics,2000,65(1):304-320.
    [57]Marfurt K. Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth[J]. Geophysics,2006, 71(4):29-40.
    [58]Meldahl P, Heggland R. Identifying faults and gas chimneys using multiattributes and neural networks[J]. The Leading Edge.2001,20(5):474-482.
    [59]Mitra S,Namson JS. Equalarea balancing[J]. American Journal of Science,1989,289: 563-599.
    [60]MitraS, Mount S.Foreland basement involved structures [J].AAPG Bulletin,1998, 82(1):70-109.
    [61]Narr W, Suppe J. Kinematics of basement involved compressive structures[J]. American Journal of Science,1994,294:802-860.
    [62]Novoa E, Mount V, Supope J. Map view interference of monoclinal folds[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1998,20:339-353.
    [63]Poblet ET J, Mccla YK. Geometry and kinematics of single layer detachment folds[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1996,80(7):1085-1109.
    [64]Quinlan GM,Beaumont C.Appalachian thrusting, lithospheric flexure, and Paleozoic stratigraphy of the Eastern Interior of North America[J].Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,1984,21(9):973-996.
    [65]Roberts A. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons [J]. First Break,2001,19(2):85-100.
    [66]Sinclair HD, Coakley BJ, Allen PA 等. Simulation of foreland basin stratigraphy using a diffusion model of mountain belt up lift and erosion:an example from the central Alps, Switzerland[J].Tectonic,1991,10(3):599-620.
    [67]Suppe J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding[J]. American Journal of Science, 1983,283:684-721
    [68]Suppe J,Medwedeff DA. Geometry and kinematics of fault propagation folding[J]. Eclog Geol Helv,1990,83:409-454.
    [69]Trappe H,Hallmich G,Foell M.Potential power in the application of seismic volume attributes[J].First Break,2000,18(9):397-402.
    [70]Use of 3D Visualization Techniques to Unravel Complex Fault Patterns for Production Planning:Njord Field, Halten Terrace, Norway[J].Geological Society London Memoirs, 2004,29(1):249-261;
    [71]Veizer J, Ala D, Azmy K,et al.87Sr/86Sr,13C and 180 evolution of Phanerozoic seawater[J]. Chemical Geology,1991,161:59-88.
    [72]Wang Guozhi, Liu Shugen.Su Wenchao et al. Water Soluble Gas in Deep Carbonate Reservoir, Sichuan Basin, Southwest China[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2008,19(6):636-644.
    [73]Wang J,Chen Y,Xu DH et al. Structure-oriented edge-preserving smoothing based on accurate estimation of orientation and edges[J]. Applied Geophysics,2009,6(4):367-376.
    [74]Wang Jinqi. Relationship between tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon in the foreland of the Longmen mountains [J]. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1996,3(3-5):327-336.
    [75]Wang Jinqi.Relationship between tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon in the foreland of the Longmen mountains[J]. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Science,1994,13(3/5):327-336.
    [76]Worley B A, Wilson C J.L.Deformation partition and foliation reactivation during transpressional orogenesis, an example from the Central Longmen Shan, China[J]. Journal of Structure Geology,1996,18(4):395-411.
    [77]Worley BA,Wilson CJL.Deformation partitioning and foliation reactivation during transpressional orogenesis,an example from the Central Longmenshan,China[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1996,18(4):395-411.
    [78]Worrel A. Rapid and accurate 3-D fault interpretation using opacity and optical stacking to reveal geologic discontinuities[J].The Leading Edge,2001,20(12):1381-1384.
    [79]Wu Xichun. Carnian (Upper Triassic) Sponge Mounds of the Northwestern Sichuan Basin, China:Stratigraphy[J]. Facies and Paleoecology.1989,21:171-188.
    [80]安凤山,王信.中坝气田须二气藏圈闭特征及成藏机理[M].见:杨克明,徐进,主编,川西坳陷致密碎屑岩领域天然气成藏理论与勘探开发方法技术,北京:地质出版社,2004:53-62.
    [81]边兆祥等.四川龙门山印支期构造发展特征[J].四川地质学报.1980,1:1-10
    [82]蔡学林,曹家敏,刘援朝等.青藏高原多向碰撞-楔入隆升地球动力学模式[J].地学前缘.1999,6(3):181-189.
    [83]蔡学林,曹家敏,朱介寿等.龙门山岩石圈地壳三维结构及汶川大地震成因浅析[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2008,35(4):357-365.
    [84]曹国喜,罗小平.中扬子区海相油气保存条件初析[J].石油与天然气地.2008,17(1):44-47.
    [85]曹俊兴,刘树根.对四川汶川大地震有关问题的思考与初步认识[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2008,35(4):414 425.
    [86]曹俊兴、刘树根、何晓燕等.龙门山地震对川西天然气聚散的影响[J].天然气工业,2009,29(2):6-11.
    [87]曹烈,安凤山,王信.川西坳陷须家河组气藏与古构造关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):224-229.
    [88]曹烈,沈忠民,安凤山.川西坳陷须家河组古圈闭类型及识别技术[J].石油学报,2006,27(4):45-49.
    [89]陈安定,杨之文,黄金明,王小群.扬子区古生界油气保存条件评价指标体系的讨论[J].南方油气,2004,17(4);10-13
    [90]陈焕疆,殷跃南.要重视开拓逆掩断层带的油气领域-试论苏南逆掩断层带控油[J].石油实验地质,1983.,5(2):83-93.
    [91]陈科贵,谌海云,孙嘉戌.地层倾角测井原理与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社.2008.
    [92]陈伟,杨克明,李书兵.龙门山南段山前印支晚期隐伏生长褶皱的构造几何模拟与分析[J].科学通报,2009,54(3):382-386.
    [93]陈昭国.四川盆地川西坳陷深盆气探讨[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(1):32-38
    [94]陈竹新,贾东,魏国齐,等.龙门山北段矿山梁构造解析及其油气勘探[J].地学前缘,2005,12(4):445-450.
    [95]陈竹新,贾东,张惬.龙门山前陆褶皱冲断带的平衡剖面分析[J].地质学报,2005,79(1):38-45.
    [96]崔秉芩,龙学明,李元林.川西拗陷的沉降与龙门山的崛起[J].成都理工学院学报,1991,18(1):39-45.
    [97]崔作舟,陈纪平.龙门山及川西高原地区的地壳结构与深部构造[J].中国地质科学院562综合大队集刊,1994,11-12:1-19.
    [98]邓宾,刘树根,李智武等.青藏高原东缘地区隆升作用特征-低温年代学证据[J].第四纪研究,2009,29(3):1-12.
    [99]邓宾,刘树根,李智武等.青藏高原东缘及四川盆地晚中生代以来隆升作用对比研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):477-486.
    [100]邓康龄,何鲤,秦大有,等.四川盆地西部晚三叠世早期地层及其沉积环境[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,3:204-210.
    [101]邓康龄,余福林.川西坳陷的复合构造与油气关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):214-219.
    [102]邓康龄.龙门山构造带印支期构造递进变形与变形时序[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(4):485-490.
    [103]董文杰,汤懋苍.青藏高原隆升和夷平过程的数值模拟研究.中国科学(D辑),1997,27(1):65-69.
    [104]付孝悦,王津义,张汉荣.南方海相天然气保存机理及保存条件初探[J].海相油气地质,2001,7(2):43-47
    [105]郭兵.龙门山中段构造特征及油气前景探讨[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.
    [106]郭彤楼,楼章华,马永生.南方海相油气保存条件评价和勘探决策中应注意的几个问题[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(1):3-9.
    [107]郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996,(是否缺页数?)
    [108]韩春明,郭华东,王长林等.一种改进的SAR图像斑点噪声滤波方法[J].遥感学报,2004,8(2):121-127.
    [109]韩应钧.龙门山中南段地区印支运动和天然气勘探目标研究[J].天然气地球科学,2002,13(5-6):66-73.
    [110]何登发.断层相关褶皱理论与应用研究新进展[J].地学前缘,2005,12(4):353-364.
    [111]何际平,鲁烈琴,王红旗等.复杂地区速度场建立与变速构造成图方法研究[J].地球物理学进展,2006,21(1):167-172.
    [112]何鲤,刘莉萍,罗潇,等.川西龙门山推覆构造特征及有利油气勘探区块预测[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(3):247-252.
    [113]胡晓凤,王韶华,盛贤等.中扬子区海相地层水化学特征与油气保存[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),29(2):32-37.
    [114]黄第藩,王兰生.2008.川西北矿山梁地区沥青脉地球化学特征及其意义[J].石油学报,2007,29(1):23-28.
    [115]黄思静,刘树根,李国蓉,等.奥陶系海相碳酸盐锶同位素组成及受成岩流体的影响[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)2004,31(1):1-7.
    [116]黄思静,石和,张萌等.锶同位素地层学在奥陶系海相地层定年中的应用—以塔里木盆地塔中12井为例[J].沉积学报,2004,22(1):1-5.
    [117]黄思静,吴素娟,孙治雷,等.2005.中新生代海水锶同位素演化和古海洋事件.地学前缘,12(2):133-141.
    [118]黄永健,张成江,汪云亮,等.龙门山造山带中段石英方解石脉的微量元素地球化学特征[J],四川地质学报,1994,19(4):297-301.
    [119]贾东,陈竹新,贾承造等.龙门山前陆褶皱带构造解析与川西前陆盆地的发育[J].高校地质学报,2039(3):402-410.
    [120]贾秋鹏,贾东,朱艾斓等.青藏高原东缘龙门山冲断带与四川盆地的现今构造表现:数字地形和地震活动证据[J].地质科学,2007,42(1):31-44.
    [121]姜秀清.储层地震属性优化及属性体综合解释[D].中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所),2006.
    [122]金文正,汤良杰,杨克明等.川西龙门山褶皱冲断带分带性变形特征[J].地质学报,2007,81(8):1072-1080.
    [123]金文正,汤良杰,万桂梅等.川西龙门山冲断带构造油气藏类型及分布预测[J].现代地质,2009,23(6):1070-1076.
    [124]金文正,汤良杰,杨克明.川西龙门山褶皱冲断带分带性变形特征[J].地质学报,2007,81(8)
    [125]金文正,汤良杰,杨克明等.龙门山冲断带构造特征研究主要进展及存在问题探讨[J].地质论评,2008,54(1):37-46.
    [126]金之钧,龙胜祥,周雁,等.中国南方膏盐岩分布特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(5):571-583.
    [127]兰大樵,邱宗恬.川西坳陷平落坝气田须二段气藏成藏研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(3):8-10.
    [128]兰大樵,张豫,戴鸿鸣.川西北地区上三叠统油气勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2005,25(11):4-6.
    [129]黎邦荣,黎从军,徐炳高.古构造对新场气田沙溪庙气藏的奠基作用[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):346-350.
    [130]黎彤.中国陆壳及其沉积层和上地壳的化学元素丰度[J].地球化学,1994,23(2):140-145.
    [131]李景明,刘树根,李本亮.中国西部C-型前陆盆地形成与油气聚集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006.
    [132]李巨初,刘树根等.川西前陆盆地流体的跨层流动[J].地质地球化学,2001,29(4):73-81.
    [133]李立,金国元.攀西裂谷带与龙门山断裂带地壳、上地幔大地电磁测深研究[J].物探与化探,1987,11(3):161-169.
    [134]李二忠,张国伟,李亚林等.秦岭造山带勉略缝合带构造变形与造山过程[J].地质学报,2003,76(4):469-483.
    [135]李书兵,陈伟,简高明等.龙门山前中段地震剖面的构造分析[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28(2):20-24.
    [136]李书兵.川西坳陷远源气藏成藏主控因素分析.见:杨克明,徐进,主编,川西坳陷致密碎屑岩领域天然气成藏理论与勘探开发方法技术[M].北京:地质出版社,2004:42-52.
    [137]李勇,曹叔尤,周荣军等.晚新生代岷江下切速率及其对青藏高原东缘山脉隆升机制和形成时限的定量约束[J].地质学报,2005,79(1):28-37.
    [138]李勇,侯中健,司光影等.青藏高原东缘新生代构造层序与构造事件[J].中国地质,2002,29(1):30-35.
    [139]李勇,孙爱珍.龙门山造山带构造地层学研究[J].地层学杂志,2002,24(3):1-7.
    [140]李勇,王成善,曾允孚.造山作用与沉积响应[J].矿物岩石,2000,20(2):49-56.
    [141]李勇,王成善.伊海生等.青藏高原中侏罗世—早白垩世羌塘复合型前陆盆地充填模式[J].沉积学报,2000,18(4):20-27.
    [142]李勇,徐公达,周荣军等.龙门山均衡重力异常及其对青藏高原东缘山脉地壳隆升的约束[J].地质通报,2006,25(1):1162-1167.
    [143]李勇,曾允孚,伊海生.龙门山前陆盆地沉积及构造演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1995.
    [144]李勇,曾允孚.龙门山逆冲推覆作用的地层标识[J].成都理工大学学报,1995,22(2):1-10
    [145]李勇,曾允孚.龙门山前陆盆地充填序列[J].成都理工大学学报,1994,21(3):46-55
    [146]李勇,曾允孚.试论龙门山逆冲推覆作用的沉积响应—以成都盆地为例[J].矿物岩石,1994,14(1):58-86.
    [147]李勇,周荣军,A.L.Densmore, M.A.Ellis青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代走滑—逆冲作用的地貌标志[J].第四纪研究,2006,26(1):40-52.
    [148]李勇,周荣军,Densmore A.L., Ellis M.A等.青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代走滑挤压作用的沉积响应[J].沉积学报,2006,24(2):1-12.
    [149]李勇.陆相岩石地层结构及其构成单元[J].中国区域地质,1994,50(3)
    [150]李勇.论龙门山前陆盆地与龙门山造山带的耦合关系[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报.1998.4:17(2):77-81
    [151]李勇.前陆盆地层学地层学.层序地层学理论和研究方法[M].成都:四川科技出版社,1994.
    [152]李勇.与碰撞造山有关的沉积盆地,王成善等主编,沉积盆地分析原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
    [153]李勇.造山作用与地层纪录[C].大陆构造及陆内变形暨第六届全国地质力学学术讨论会论文集,北京:地质出版社,2000.
    [154]李元林.四川盆地西缘冲积扇形成的构造背景分析.罗志立等编,龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994:338-345.
    [155]李智武,刘树根,陈洪德等.龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):440-454.
    [156]李智武,刘树根,陈洪德等.龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):440-454.
    [157]林良彪,陈洪德,姜平等.川西前陆盆地须家河组沉积相及岩相古地理演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(4):376-383.
    [158]林茂炳,苟宗海,王国芝等.龙门山中段地质[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1996.
    [159]林茂炳,吴山.龙门山推覆构造变形特征[J].成都地质学院学报,1991,18(1):46-55.
    [160]林茂炳.初论龙门山推覆构造带的基本结构样式[J].成都理工学院学报,1994,21(3):1-7.
    [161]林茂炳.对龙门山南段宝兴-芦山地区构造格局的探讨[J].成都地质学院学报,1992,19(3):33-40.
    [162]刘埃平,文龙,张闻林.川西前陆盆地上三叠统异常高压研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(增刊A):45-48.
    [163]刘大成,李书舜,周志军等.鸭子河构造深层须家河组油气勘探目标选择与评价[J].天然气勘探与开发,2002,25(1):38-45.
    [164]刘国臣,金之钧,李京昌.沉积盆地沉积-剥蚀过程定量研究的一种新方法—盆地波动分析应用之一[J].沉积学报,1995,13(3):23-31.
    [165]刘和甫,梁慧社,蔡立国,沈匕.川西龙门山冲断系构造样式与前陆盆地演化[J].地质学报,1994,68(2):101-118.
    [166]刘和甫,李晓清,刘立群等.盆山耦合与前陆盆地成藏区带分析[J].现代地质,2004,18(4):389-403.
    [167]刘和甫,梁慧社,蔡立国等.川西龙门山冲断系构造样式与前陆盆地演化[J].地质学报,1994,68(2):101-118.
    [168]刘和甫,汪泽成,熊保贤,等.中国中西部中、新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘,2000,7(03):55-69.
    [169]刘和甫.盆地—山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2001,26(6):582-596.
    [170]刘静,张智慧,文力等.汶川8级大地震同震破裂的特殊性及构造意义[J].地质学报,2008,82(12):1707-1722.
    [171]刘树根,李智武,曹俊兴等.龙门山陆内复合造山带的四维结构构造特征[J].地质科学,2009,44(4):1151-1179.
    [172]刘树根,罗志立,曹树恒.四川龙门山冲断带(中北段)岩石圈的层圈性和多级滑脱推覆[J].四川地质学报,1990,10(3):145-150.
    [173]刘树根,罗志立,庞家黎等.四川盆地西部的峨眉地裂运动及找气新领域[J].成都地质学院学报,1991,18(1):83-90.
    [174]刘树根,罗志立,宋鸿彪等.四川龙门山冲断带中北段岩石圈结构研究[J].石油与天然气地质,1990,11(1):86-95.
    [175]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统形成的动力学模式及模拟研究[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(5):432-438.
    [176]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.试论中国西部陆内俯冲型前陆盆地的基本特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):37-48.
    [177]刘树根,罗志立.四川龙门山地区的峨眉地裂运动[J].四川地质学报,1991,11(3):174-180.
    [178]刘树根,田小彬,李智武等.龙门山中段构造特征与汶川地震[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):387-397.
    [179]刘树根,童崇光,罗志立等.川西晚三叠世前陆盆地的形成与演化[J].天然气工业,1995,15(2):11-16.
    [180]刘树根,汪华,孙玮等.四川盆地海相领域油气地质条件专属性问题分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(6):781-792.
    [181]刘树根,李国蓉,李巨初等.川西前陆盆地流体的跨层流动和天然气爆发式成藏[J].地质学报,2005,79(5):690-699.
    [182]刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995,69(3):205-214.
    [183]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统形成的动力学模式及模拟研究[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(2):432-438.
    [184]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式-以龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报,2003,77(2):177-186.
    [185]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式--以龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报,2003,77(2):177-186.
    [186]刘树根,王国芝,徐国盛等.龙门山造山带盆山转换时期的流体及流体迁移特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,30(1):19-24
    [187]刘树根,徐国盛,李巨初等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统的成山成盆成藏动力学[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,30(6):559-566.
    [188]刘树根,赵锡奎,罗志立等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统构造事件研究[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):221-230.
    [189]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1993:17-21.
    [190]刘孝艳.扩散张量在图像处理中的应用[D].西安:西安电子科技大学,2008.
    [191]刘应楷.四川盆地燕山早期构造形变世代[M].四川石油普查,1999,1:49-56.
    [192]龙学明,罗志立.龙门山冲断带的分区及其演化.罗志立等编,龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994:317-329.
    [193]龙学明.龙门山中北段地史发展的若干问题[J].成都地质学院学报,1991,18(1):8-16.
    [194]楼章华,马永生,郭彤楼等.中国南方海相地层油气保存条件评价[J].天然气工业,2008,26(8):8-12
    [195]鲁人齐,何登发John Suppe.龙门山中段山前带浅层冲断系统的结构、形成与演化[J].地质科学,2010,45(4):997-1010.
    [196]吕雪雁,朱筱敏,申银民等.塔里木盆地台盆区三叠系层序地层研究和有利勘探区预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):32-35.
    [197]吕志洲.龙门山冲断带构造特征与油气勘探前景研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2008.
    [198]罗啸泉,安凤山.川西坳陷圈闭分类[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2007,27(1):67-71.
    [199]罗啸泉,陈兰.川西坳陷形成演化及其与油气的关系[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(1):16-19.
    [200]罗志立,金以钟,朱夔玉等.试论上扬子地台的峨眉地裂运动[J].地质论评,1988,34(1),11-23.
    [201]罗志立,龙学明.龙门山造山带崛起和川西陆前盆地沉降[J].四川地质学报,1992,12(1):204-318.
    [202]罗志立,赵锡奎,刘树根等.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1994.
    [203]罗志立,龙学明.龙门山造山带的崛起和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].四川地质学报,1992,12(1):204-218.
    [204]罗志立.峨眉地裂运动的厘定及其意义[J].四川地质学报,1989,9(1):1-17.
    [205]罗志立.龙门山造山带岩石圈演化的动力学模式[J].成都地质学院学报,1991,18(1):1-7.
    [206]罗志立.试论中国型(C-型)冲断带及其油气勘探问题[J].石油天然气地质.1984.5(4):315-323.
    [207]罗志立.四川盆地基底结构的新认识[J].成都理工学院学报,1998,25(2):191-200.
    [208]罗志立.四川盆地基底结构的新认识[J].成都理工学院学报,1998,25(2):191-200.
    [209]马杏垣,索书田.论滑覆及岩石圈内多层次滑脱构造[J].地质学报,1984,3:205-213.
    [210]彭希龄,梁狄刚,王昌桂等.前陆盆地理论及其在中国的应用[J].石油学报,2006,27(1):132-145.
    [211]契林盖里GV.沥青、地沥青和沥青砂.俞经方[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988.
    [212]四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社.1991.
    [213]宋文海.论龙门山北段推覆构造及其油气前景[J].天然气工业,1989,19(3):2-9.
    [214]宋岩,洪峰.四川盆地川西坳陷深盆气地质条件分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2):11-14.
    [215]宋岩,赵孟军,李本亮等.我国中西部前陆盆地油气地质特征及勘探战略[J].中国工程科学,2010,12(5):39-45.
    [216]苏文超,胡瑞忠,彭建堂等.滇黔桂地区卡林型金矿床成矿物质来源的锶同位素证据.矿物岩石地球化学通报[J],2000,19(4):256-259.
    [217]孙甫南,曾庆庸.川西地区南部侏罗系次生气藏形成机制探讨[J].天然气工业,1994.14(1):23-28.
    [218]孙夕平,杜世通.乘幂法在地震属性分析中的应用.物探化探计算技术[J].2000,22(4):316-321.
    [219]汤良杰,杨克明,金文正等.龙门山冲断带多层次滑脱带与滑脱构造变形[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008,38(增刊Ⅰ):30-40.
    [220]汤良杰,郭彤楼,田海芹等.黔中地区多期构造演化\差异变形与油气保存条件[J].地质学报,2008,82(3):298-307
    [221]唐大海,陈洪斌,谢继等.四川盆地西部侏罗系沙溪庙组气藏成藏条件[J].天然气勘探开发,2005,28(3):14-19.
    [222]唐立章,曹烈,安凤山.川西坳陷油气圈闭类型分析[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(4):328-332.
    [223]唐立章,张贵生,张晓鹏等.川西须家河组致密砂岩成藏主控因素[J].天然气工业,2004,24(9):5-7.
    [224]唐荣昌,黄祖智,马声浩等.四川活动断裂带的基本特征[J].地震地质,1995,17(4):390-396.
    [225]唐荣昌,文德华,黄祖智等.松潘-龙门山地区主要活动断裂带第四纪活动特征[J].中国地震,1991,7(3):61-71.
    [226]陶晓风.龙门山南段推覆构造与前陆盆地演化[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):73-77.
    [227]童崇光,胡受权.龙门山山前带北段油气远景评价[J].成都理工学院学报,1997,24(2):1-8.
    [228]王道永.龙门山中段中生代前陆盆地的构造演化史[J].成都理工学院学报,1994,21(3):20-28.
    [229]王二七,孟庆任.对龙门山中生代和新生代构造演化的讨论[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008,38(10):1221-1233.
    [230]王二七,孟庆任,陈智梁等.龙门山断裂带印支期左旋走滑运动及其大地构造成因[J].地学前缘,2001,8(1):375-384.
    [231]王国芝,刘树根,赵锡奎.龙门山中段川西前陆盆地初始盆山边界及其变迁[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):431-439.
    [232]王国芝,胡瑞忠,苏文超等.滇-黔-桂地区右江盆地流体流动与成矿作用[J].中国科学,2002,32(增刊):78-86.
    [233]王国芝,刘树根,时华星等.伊朗Kashan区块含烃流体来源的地球化学示踪[J].矿物岩石,2009,29(2):72-77.
    [234]王国芝,刘树根,徐国盛等.龙门山中段推覆体内流体包裹体特征[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(4):394-398
    [235]王金琪.川西坳陷须家河组(T3x)气藏再认识[J].天然气工业,2002,22(2):1-6.
    [236]王金琪.龙门山构造演化与山前带油气关系[J].地球学报,1994,3-4:167-179.
    [237]王金琪.早聚晚藏——川西坳陷天然气基本特征[J].天然气工业,2001,21(1):5-12.
    [238]王兰生,韩克猷,谢邦华等.龙门山推覆构造带北段油气田形成条件探讨[J].天然气工业,2005,25(S1):1-5
    [239]王磊.准南前陆冲断带断裂对油气成藏与保存的控制作用研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2007.
    [240]王清晨,李忠.盆山耦合与沉积盆地成因[J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):24-30.
    [241]王全伟,梁斌,谢启兴等.青川地区青川断裂带的显微构造及其变形条件研究[J].矿物岩石,2000,20(1):87-90.
    [242]王世谦.四川盆地侏罗系—震口.系天然气的地球化学特征[J].天然气工业,1994,14(6):1-5.
    [243]王廷栋,王海清.以凝析油轻烃和天然气碳同位素特征判断气源[J].西南石油学院学报,1989,11(3):1-15.
    [244]王伟.地震几何属性识别断层技术研究及应用[D].北京:中国石油大学,2009.
    [245]王西文,杨孔庆,周立宏等.基于小波变换的地震相干体算法研究[J].地球物理学报,2002,45(6):847-85.
    [246]王绪本,余年,朱迎堂.龙门山逆冲构造带大地电磁测深初步成果[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):398-403.
    [247]王一刚,实立荣,文应初等.四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组高硫气藏H2S成因研究[J].地球化学,2002,31(6):517-524.
    [248]王永标,徐海军.四川盆地侏罗纪至早白垩世沉积旋回与构造隆升的关系[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2001,26(3):241-246.
    [249]王永刚.地震资料综合解释方法[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2007,66-80.
    [250]文德华.龙门山北段断裂活动[J].四川地震,1994,1:53-57.
    [251]吴根耀,马力.“盆”“山”耦合和脱耦:进展,现状和努力方向[J].大地构造与成矿学,2004,28(01):81-97.
    [252]吴根耀,马力.试论”盆”“山”的耦合和脱耦及其运动学.石油实验地质,25(2):99-109.
    [253]吴根耀,马力.试论”盆”“山”的耦合和脱耦研究的方法学[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):239-246.
    [254]吴山,赵兵,胡新伟.再论龙门山飞来峰[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(3):221-224.
    [255]吴山.龙门山巨型滑覆型飞来峰体系与龙门山构造活动性[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008.35(4):376-382.
    [256]吴山.龙门山南段大型飞来峰[J].矿物岩石,1998,18(增刊):61-66.
    [257]吴山.龙门山彭灌杂岩体中韧性剪切带的发现及其构造意义[J].矿物岩石,1993,13(2):71-77.
    [258]吴熙纯.川西北晚三叠世卡尼期硅质海绵礁—鲕滩组合的沉积相分析[J].古地理学报,2009,11(2):125-142.
    [259]熊翥.21世纪中初期油气地球物理技术展望[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006.
    [260]徐国盛,刘树根.川西上三叠统高压封存箱与天然气成藏关系研究[J].成都理工学院学报,26(4):411-417.
    [261]徐强,廖仕孟,朱永刚等.川西龙门山前陆盆地中砂砾质楔形体的定量统计[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4):31-37.
    [262]徐锡伟,闻学泽,叶建青等.汶川MS8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造[J].地震地质,2008,30(3):597-629.
    [263]徐锡伟主编.汶川地震图集.汶川8.0级地震科学研究报告[M].北京:地震出版社.2008.
    [264]许效松,刘宝珺,赵玉光等.上扬子西缘二叠纪—三叠纪层序地层与盆山转化耦合[M].北京:地质出版社.1997.
    [265]许志琴,侯立伟,王宗秀等.中国松潘-甘孜造山带的造山过程[M].北京:地质出版社.1992.
    [266]许志琴.陆内俯冲及滑脱构造--以我国几个山链的地壳变形研究为例[J].地质论评,1986,32(1):79-89.
    [267]薛钧月.龙门山构造带中—北段构造流体地球化学特征及其与成藏关系的探讨[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.
    [268]杨长清,刘树根,曹波等.龙门山造山带与川西前陆盆地耦合关系及其对油气成藏的控制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(04):471-476.
    [269]杨逢清,殷鸿福,杨恒书等.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史[J].地质学报,1994,68(3):208-218.
    [270]杨广全,梁晓,王根厚.逆冲断裂及相关褶皱的几何学与运动学定量化研究进展[J].地质通报,2010,29(1)
    [271]杨克明,唐宇,李书兵等.川西坳陷低孔渗碎屑岩气藏成藏机理及勘探潜力.见:杨克明,徐进,主编,川西坳陷致密碎屑岩领域天然气成藏理论与勘探开发方法技术[M].北京:地质出版社,2004:22-27.
    [272]杨克明,叶军,吕正祥.川西坳陷上三叠统成藏年代学特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):208-213.
    [273]杨克明,叶军,吕正祥.川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组天然气分布及成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):501-505.
    [274]杨克明.川西坳陷油气资源现状及勘探潜力[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(4):322-326.
    [275]杨荣军,刘树根,吴熙纯等.龙门山前缘上三叠统马鞍塘组沉积分布特征及其控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):455-462.
    [276]姚根顺,李大成,卢文忠等.四川叠合盆地盆山耦合特征分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(4):435-444.
    [277]于福生,张芳峰,杨长清.龙门山前缘关口断裂典型构造剖面的物理模拟实验及其变形主控因素研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(2):147-158.
    [278]张波,张进江,杨武岭等.我国中西部前陆盆地归属及其含油气性评述[J].高校地质学报,2005,11(1):126-136.
    [279]张国伟,郭安林,姚平安.中国大陆构造中的西秦岭-松潘大陆构造结[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):23-32。
    [280]张惠珍.混合智能学习法神经网络在储层油气预测中的应用研究[D].成都理工大学,2005.
    [281]张金川,刘丽芳,唐玄等.川西坳陷根缘气藏异常地层压力[J].地学前缘,2008,15(2):147-155.
    [282]张林,魏国齐.四川盆地震旦系下古生界沥青产烃潜力及分布特征.石油实验地质,2005,27(3):276-280.
    [283]张玮,詹仕凡,张少华等.石油地球物理勘探技术进展与发展方向[J].中国工程科学,2010,12(5):
    [284]张闻林,陈义才,高熙等.川西北部地区侏罗系气藏成藏特征-与川西南部侏罗系气藏比较[J].天然气工业,2007,27(10):15-19.
    [285]张永刚,汤良杰,金文正.龙门山前中段地震剖面的构造分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版,2009
    [286]张自超.我国某些元古宙及早寒武世碳酸盐岩石的锶同位素组成[J].地质论评.1995,41(4):349-354.
    [287]赵小麟,邓起东,陈社发.龙门山逆断裂带中段的构造地貌学研究[J].地震地质,1994,16(4):422-428.
    [288]郑民,贾承造,冯志强等.前陆盆地勘探领域三个潜在的油气接替区[J].石油学报,2010,31(5):723-728.
    [289]郑荣才,朱如凯,翟文亮等.川西类前陆盆地晚三叠世须家河组构造演化及层序充填样 式[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):246-255.
    [290]郑荣才,朱如凯,翟文亮等.川西前陆盆地晚三叠世须家河期构造演化及层序充填样式[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):246-255.
    [291]中国石化石油物探技术研究院.油气地球物理技术新进展:第78届SEG年会论文概要[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010.
    [292]钟锴,徐鸣洁,王良书等.川西两期前陆盆地南北两段构造演化的地球物理特征[J].石油学报,2004,25(6):29-37.
    [293]朱介寿.汶川地震的岩石圈深部结构与动力学背景[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):348-356.
    [294]朱彤,梁恩宇.龙门山中段前缘鸭子河构造深层须家河组油气勘探[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):59-63.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700