用户名: 密码: 验证码:
北京市郊区农村居民点用地转型与功能演变研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文立足于传统农村居民点在发展过程中的形态和功能演变,选取北京市郊区农村典型样带开展实地调查,研究农村居民点土地利用转型的方式、特征及成因,探寻土地利用转型背后的农村居民点功能演变规律和机理。同时,将规律和机理研究的成果应用于农村居民点整治实践,提出基于功能需求和演变规律的农村居民点整治调控模式,为实现农村居民点可持续利用和新型城镇化战略提供科学支撑。研究主要得出如下结论:
     (1)研究区域农村居民点用地的显性转型主要体现在土地利用结构的空间分异上。随着与中心城距离的拉近,农村居民点土地利用结构的多样性不断增加,土地利用格局也从农村住宅占主导的单一形式,逐渐转变为住宅、产业、公共服务等用地形式并存。作为土地利用结构的补充,农户宅基地的多功能利用,从近郊到远郊,存在商、住、工业和旅游接待等农户自住用途之外的功能衍生。
     农村居民点显性形态在空间上的圈层分异,符合竞租理论。城市扩张和功能外溢是农村居民点显性转型的主要外部驱动因素。集体经济组织和农户降低租值消散,将外在收益内部化的努力,是农村居民点用地显性转型的内生动力。
     (2)农村居民点用地隐性转型主要表现在土地利用的去集体化和农村非农产业升级两个方面。前者是指农村建设用地经营利用中“集体意志”的逐渐退出,代表着农村生产资料配置模式的市场化转变;后者则代表着农村经济产品和服务的多样性趋势,是农村居民点服务范围扩大的一种间接体现。土地利用隐性转型反映出,农村居民点用地由原来的保障性功能逐渐衍生出收益功能,从而影响着农户的生计。
     (3)土地利用转型是农村居民点功能演变的表征属性。土地利用的显性转型,反映了作为聚落个体的农村居民点经济产出的变化;而土地利用的隐性转型,则预示着城乡系统的要素流动和市场配置中,农村居民点角色的转变。农村居民点功能演变的背后,是农村工业化城镇化模式由内生型向外生型的根本性转变。
     三个不同类型农村居民点的演变案例分析,从微观上印证了农村居民点功能演变的时空规律和机理:研究区域农村居民点呈现出的土地利用形态与功能的空间分异,实际上是传统农业发展、农村工业化、城市功能外溢这三股发展驱动力,在不同时间阶段、不同作用范围上叠加的结果。农村居民点的功能演变和分化过程,也是外部环境对其“自然选择”的过程。土地利用形态,则是作为“基因”的功能,在农村居民点本体上的表达。
     (4)通过对北京市典型城中村整治案例的分析,提炼出以功能调控为主线的农村居民点整治框架。基于功能需求的现状分析和基于功能演变规律的功能规划,是功能调控的前提。在此基础上的功能调控原则应是,保护和继承有需要的功能,引导和剔除不需要的功能。
The evolution of form and function of traditional rural settlements was the starting point of this study. In this paper, a typical study transect in suburban Beijing was selected to study the land use transition and functional evolution of the rural settlements. First, we identified the spatial differentiation of land use form of the rural settlements and analyzed its external factors and internal causes. Then, the temporal-spatial characteristics of visible and invisible land use transition were combined to explore the dynamic mechanism of rural settlements' functional evolution. Finally, the rules of functional evolution were applied to the village renovation. A new mode of village renovation based on functional regulation was proposed to realize the sustainable land use of rural settlements and new rural residential urbanization strategy. The main conclusions are as follows:
     (1)The visible land use transition of rural settlements is mainly reflected on the spatial differentiation of land use structure. From the rural hinterland to the near-urban countryside, the diversity and complication of the land-use structure show a rising trend. The land use pattern in which rural residential land dominated, gradually changes into a coexisting pattern of rural residential land, non-agricultural industrial land, infrastructure land and so on. Besides that, the use change of rural housing also differs across the transect. Commercial, housing rental, manufacturing and tourist reception functions derive from residential use.
     The circle distribution of visible land use transition meets the rent-seeking model. The urban physical expansion and functional spillover turns out to be the key external factors to drive the land use transition of rural settlements. The efforts of minimizing the rent dissipation from both the collective economic organization and households are the endogenous power of the land use transition.
     (2)The invisible land use transition is mainly reflected on the de-collectivized of land use and the non-agricultural industrial upgrading. The de-collectivized of land use means the quit of "collective will" from rural construction land use. It implies a shift on the modes of allocating in the rural area. The non-agricultural industrial upgrading implies the diversification of economic outputs, due to the improvement of capital goods and product markets. It's the expansion of rural settlement's service scope.The invisible land use transition indicates that rural settlement gradually derives function of benefit, which also affects the farmers' income structure and livelihoods.
     (3)Visible and invisible land use forms are the characteristics of functional evolution of rural settlements. The visible land use forms reflect changes on the economic production of a single village. While the invisible land use forms imply the transition of the role which the rural settlement plays in the resource allocation of the urban-rural system. As for the functional evolution of the rural settlement, the change form endogenous mode of rural industrialization and urbanization to exogenous mode, is the basic motive force.
     The case studies of three different kinds of villages (Hegezhuang, Beifaxin, and Shaziying) confirmed the spatio-temporal rules of functional evolution of rural settlements. The rules indicate that:differentiation of land use forms and functions in rural settlements is actually caused by the superposition of three driving forces in different time and scale, which includes traditional agricultural development, rural industrialization and urban functional spillover.
     Functional evolution of the rural settlement is a result of the "natural selection" by the environment. Land use form of the rural settlement is the expression of the "gene", which represents the function.
     (4) By analyzing the reconstruction process of the typical urban villages in Beijing, we formulated a framework for village renovation. A situation analysis based on the functional demand and a functional planning based on the rules of functional evolution, are preparatory work for functional regulation. Principles of this functional regulation include two aspects:protecting the functions in need and eliminating the functions that are no longer needed.
引文
[1]Alchian A A. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1950:211-221.
    [2]Andre Sorensen. Conflict, consensus or consent implications of Japanese land readjustment practice for developing countries[J]. Habitat International,2000, (24):51-73.
    [3]Antrop, M., and Van Eetvelde, V. Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes:visual image interpretation and landscape metrics[J]. Landscape Urban Planning,2000,50(1-3):43-58.
    [4]Arayama, Y., Miyoshi, K. Regional diversity and sources of economic growth in China[J]. World Economy.2004,27 (10),1583-1607
    [5]Barzel Y. Theory of Rationing by Waiting, A[J]. JL and Econ.,1974,17-73.
    [6]Brown, D. L. and Wardell, J. W. New Directions in Urban-Rural Migration:the Population turn around in Rural America[M]. Academic Press, New York.1980.
    [7]Browning H L, Singelmann J. The emergence of a service society:demographic and sociological aspects of the sectoral transformation of the labor force in the USA[J].1975.
    [8]Bryant, R. L., Paniagua, A., Kizos, T. Conceptualising'shadow landscape'in political ecology and rural studies[J]. Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):460-471.
    [9]Busby, G., and Rendle, S. The transition from tourism on farms to farm tourism[J]. Tourism Management,2000,21:635-642.
    [10]Carmen, C F and G I Elena. Determinants of residential land use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe[J]. American Agricultural Economics Association,2004,86(4):889-904.
    [11]Carter C A, Zhong F, Cai F. China's ongoing agricultural reform[M]. The 1990 Institute, 1996.
    [12]Castro Coelho J, Aguiar Pinto P, Mira da Silva L. A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs):a model and its application[J]. Agricultural Systems,2001,68(3):179-195.
    [13]Champion A G. Counterurbanization:the changing pace and nature of population deconcentration[J].1989.
    [14]Cheung S N S. Theory of Price Control, A[J]. JL and Econ.,1974,17-53.
    [15]Chow, G. C., China's Economic Transformation[M]. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford,2002.
    [16]Dahms, F. A., St Jacobs Ontario:from declining village to thriving tourist community [J]. Ontario Geography,1991,36:1-13.
    [17]Dahms, F. A. "Dying villages",'counterurbanization' and the urban field e a Canadian perspective[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1995,11(1),21-33.
    [18]Dahms, F. A. Demetropolitanisation or the 'urbanisation' of the countryside:the changing function of small rural settlements in Ontario[J]. Ontario Geography,24,35-62.
    [19]Dahms, F. A. Diversity, complexity and change:characteristics of some Ontario towns and villages[J]. The Canadian Geographer,1986(30):158-166.
    [20]Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selection:or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life[M]. AL Burt,2009.
    [21]Delphis, F L J and R P Daniel. The use of cluster analysis in distinguishing farmland prone to residential development:a case study of Sterling, Massachusett[J]. Environmental Management,2000,25(5):541-548.
    [22]Domon, G. Landscape as resource:Consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2011.100(4,30):338-340.
    [23]Dumont, R., Types of Rural Economy, Studies in world agriculture, London:Methuen and Co. Ltd. (Distributed in U. S. A. by Barnes and Noble, New York).1957
    [24]Fengkai Zhu, Fengrong Zhang, Can Li, Taifeng Zhu Functional transition of the rural settlement:Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing, China[J]. Habitat International.2014,41:262-271
    [25]Fuentes J M, Gallego E, Garcia A I, et al. New uses for old traditional farm buildings:The case of the underground wine cellars in Spain[J]. Land Use Policy,2010,27(3):738-748.
    [26]Gordon H S. The economic theory of a common-property resource:the fishery[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1954:124-142.
    [27]Grainger A. National land use morphology:Patterns andpossibilities[J]. Geography,1995, 80(3):235-245.
    [28]Grainger A. The future role of the tropical rain forests in the world forest economy [D]. Oxford:Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford,1986.
    [29]Hansen, A J and D G Brown. Land-Use Change in Rural America:Rates, Drivers, and Consequences[J]. Ecological Applications,2005,15 (6):1849-1850.
    [30]Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons[J]. science,1968,162(3859):1243-1248.
    [31]Heilig G K. Sustainable Regional and Rural Development in China:Where Do We Stand?[N]. IIASA Interim Report IR, Laxenburg,2003,3-26
    [32]Heilig, G. K. Sustainable regional and rural development in China:where do we stand? [N]. IIASA Interim Report IR-03-026, Laxenburg.1995.
    [33]Hodge G, Qadeer M A. Towns and villages in Canada:the importance of being unimportant[M]. Toronto:Butterworths,1983.
    [34]Hoggart K, Paniagua A. The restructuring of rural Spain?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2001, 17(1):63-80.
    [35]Huang, Y., Agricultural Reform in China:Getting Institutions Right[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.1998.
    [36]Knight F H. Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1924,38(4):582-606.
    [37]Koch G W, Scholes R J, Steffen W L, et al. The IGBP terrestrial transects:science plan[J]. Global Change Report (Sweden),1995.
    [38]Lin, G. C. S. Developing China:Land, politics and social conditions[J]. New York: Routledge.2009
    [39]Liu Y, Wang L, Long H. Spatio-temporal analysis of land-use conversion in the eastern coastal China during 1996-2005[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2008,18(3):274-282.
    [40]Long H, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Building new countryside in China:A geographical perspective [J]. Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):457-470.
    [41]Long H, Liu Y, Wu X, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su-Xi-Chang region:Implications for building a new countryside in coastal China[J]. Land Use Policy,2009,26(2):322-333.
    [42]Long Hualou, Woods M. Rural restructuring under globalization in eastern coastal China: What can be learnedfrom Wales? Journal of Rural and Community Development,2011,6(1): 70-94.
    [43]Long, H. L., Heilig, G. K., Li, X. B., and Zhang, M. Socio-economic development and land-use change:analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China[J]. Land Use Policy,2007,24:141-153.
    [44]Long, H. L., Liu, Y. S., Li, X. B., and Chen, Y. F. Building new countryside in China:a geographical perspective. Land Use Policy,2010,27,457-470.
    [45]Ma, L. J. C. Economic reforms, urban spatial restructuring, and planning in China[J]. Progress in Planning,2004.61(3):237-260.
    [46]McDonnell M J, Pickett S T A. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology[J]. Ecology,1990:1232-1237.
    [47]Niroula G S, Thapa G B. Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia[J]. Land Use Policy,2005,22(4):358-372.
    [48]Okuno T. A consideration on the socio-economic regionality of the matsumoto basin:based on the numerical regionalization framework[J].1987.
    [49]P. Bonfanti, A. Fregonese, M. Sigura. Landscape analysis in areas affected by land consolidation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1997, (37):91-98.
    [50]Peter S. Implications of rural settlement patterns for development:A historical case study in Qaukeni, Eastern Cape, Sourth Africa[J]. Development Southern Africa.2003, (9):406-425.
    [51]Rafael Crecentea, Carlos Alvaxeza, Urban of economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia[J]. Land Use Policy,2002, (19):135-147.
    [52]Robinson, G. M. Conflict and Change in the Countryside. Belhaven Press, London.1990.
    [53]Rosato-Stevens, M. Peasant land tenure security in China's transitional economy[J]. Boston University International Law Journal,2008,26:97-141.
    [54]Sharma, R. L. et al., Regional disparities in levels of diversification in rural economy in India, Geographical Review of India,47(2),199
    [55]Sharp, J. S., Smith, M. B. Social capital and farming at the rural-urban interface:the importance of nonfarmer and farmer relations[J]. Agricultural Systems,2003,76(3): 913-927.
    [56]Sharpley, R., and Vass, A. Tourism, farming and diversification:an attitudinal study[J]. Tourism Management,2006,27:1040-1052.
    [57]Sklenicka P. Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic[J]. Land Use Policy,2006,23(4):502-510.
    [58]Song H, Thisse J F, Zhu X., Urbanization and/or rural industrialization in China. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2012,42(1):126-134.
    [59]Stola, W., A functional classification of the rural areas in the Suwatki Voivodship, Development of Rural Areas, Procedings in the 4th Hungarian-Polish Seminar Goldap, Poland,1980:20-30.
    [60]Tabukeli M. Rural Settlement and Retail Trade Business in the Eastern Cape [J]. Development Southern Africa.2000, (6):190-203.
    [61]Townsend, A. New directions in the growth of tourism employment-propositions of the 1980s[J]. Environment and Planning A,1992,24:821-832.
    [62]Verhoeve A, De Roo N, Rogge E. How to visualise the invisible:Revealing re-use of rural buildings by non-agricultural entrepreneurs in the region of Roeselare-Tielt (Belgium)[J]. Land Use Policy,2012,29(2):407-416.
    [63]Wang, H., Wang, L. L., and Su, F. B. Rural residential properties in China:land use patterns, efficiency and prospects for reform[J]. Habitat International,2012,36:201-209.
    [64]Wasilewski, A and K Krukowski. Land conversion for suburban housing:a study of urbanization around Warsaw and Olsztyn, Poland[J]. Environmental Management,2004, 34(2):291-303.
    [65]Woods M. Rural Geography:Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London:Sage,2005.
    [66]World Bank, Rural China:Transition and Development, World Bank Report, Rural Development and Natural Resources Unit, East Asia and pacific Region. The World Bank, Washington DC,1999.
    [67]Yaldir A L, Rehman T. A methodology for constructing multicriteria decision support systems for agricultural land consolidation using GIS and API:an illustration from Turkey[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2002,36(1):55-78.
    [68]Yang, Z. S., Cai, J. M., and Sliuzas, R. Agro-tourism enterprises as a form of multi-functional urban agriculture for peri-urban development in China[J]. Habitat International,2010. 34:374-385.
    [69]Zhao S. X. B., Wong K. K. K., The sustainability dilemma of China's township and village enterprises:an analysis from spatial and functional perspectives[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002,18(3):257-273.
    [70]Zhao, P. J. Sustainable urban expansion and transportation in a growing megacity: consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing[J]. Habitat International,2004,34:236-243.
    [71]Zhou, Y., Ma, L. J. C., Economic restructuring and suburbanization in China. Urban Geography,2000,21(3):205-236.
    [72]包路芳.城市化进程中的“城中村”改造与和谐社会建设——以北京市海淀区挂甲屯为例[J].理论前沿,2007(5):47-48.
    [73]蔡为民,唐华俊,陈佑启等.近20年黄河三角洲典型地区农村居民点景观格局[J].资源科学,2004,26(5):89-97.
    [74]蔡运龙,汪涌,李玉平.中国耕地供需变化规律研究[J].中国土地科学,2009(03):11-18
    [75]蔡运龙.农业与农村可持续发展的地理学研究[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(6):602-606
    [76]曹建海.为何要大力发展生产性服务业[J].市场周刊,2009(4):20-21.
    [77]曹子剑.北京市平谷区不同区域农村居民点内部结构差异分析[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):121-126.
    [78]陈美球,何维佳,刘桃菊等.当前农户农村居民点用地集约利用意愿的实证分析——以江西省为例[J].中国农村经济,2009,(8):63-69
    [79]陈其春,吕成文,李壁成,等.县级尺度土地利用结构特征定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(1):223-231.
    [80]陈士辉.农村社区的功能与结构研究[J].农村经济与社会,1992(2):62-65
    [81]陈暹秋,邹泉华.广东城镇化农村集体资产的特点,问题及对策[J].南方农村,2004(3):28-30.
    [82]程大中.中国生产性服务业的水平、结构及影响[J].经济研究,2008,1:76-88.
    [83]程莉,刘志文,周宗社.结构转变、经济增长与城乡收入差距[J].经济与管理,2013,10:11-17.
    [84]程启军,徐伟.断裂与嬗变:城乡互动的结构性和动态性分析[J].天府新论,2004,4:90-92.
    [85]村落社会研究会.土地と村落<3变态>村落の貌と土地利用形.農渔協山村文化会(1988/10)
    [86]丁关良.1949年以来中国农村宅基地制度的演变[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(04):9-21.
    [87]丁寿颐.转型发展背景下的乡村重构与城乡关系的思考——北京“何各庄模式”的实证研究[J].城市发展研究,2013,(10):5-9.
    [88]董春,罗玉波,刘纪平,等.基于Poisson对数线性模型的居民点与地理因子的相关性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(4):79-84.
    [89]杜志雄,张兴华.从国外农村工业化模式看中国农村工业化之路[J].经济研究参考,2006(73):32-35.
    [90]樊杰,陶普曼W.中国农村工业化的经济分析及省际发展水平差异[J].地理学报,1996,51(5):398-407.
    [91]樊胜根,张林秀,张晓波.中国农村公共投资在农村经济增长和反贫困中的作用[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1):1-13
    [92]范少言.乡村聚落空间结构的演变机制[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),1994,24(4):295-298.
    [93]房艳刚,刘继生.集聚型农业村落文化景观的演化过程与机理—以山东曲阜峪口村为例[J].地理研究,2009,28(4):968-977.
    [94]费孝通.江村经济——中国农民的生活[M].北京:商务印书馆.2001
    [95]费孝通.论中国小城镇的发展[J]中国农村经济,1996(3):3-5
    [96]冯蕾,李慧.数万“蚁族”:无处安放的青春[N].光明日报,2011,07-28(016)
    [97]冯文勇,陈新荀.晋中平原地区农村聚落扩展分析[J].人文地理,2003,18(6):93-96.
    [98]冯云廷.我国城乡经济关系的评价及分析[J].中国软科学,2009,10:117-123
    [99]高菠阳,刘卫东,杜超.土地制度对北京制造业空间分布的影响[J].地理科学进展,2010(7):878-886.
    [100]谷晓坤,陈百明,代兵.经济发达区农村居民点整理驱动力与模式——以浙江省嵊州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2007.22(5):701-708.
    [101]关小克,张凤荣,赵婷婷,方磊,朱泰峰.北京市农村居民点整理分区及整理模式探讨[J].地域研究与开发,2010,(03):114-118
    [102]郭丹,谷洪波,尹宏文.基于农村产业结构调整的我国农村劳动力就业分析[J].中国软科学,2010,01:18-24.
    [103]郭焕成,刘盛和.二十一世纪我国农业区划研究的主要任务[J].中国农业资源与区划,1999,20(4):38-41.
    [104]郭焕成,姚建衢,任国柱.中国农业类型划分的初步研究[J].地理学报,1992,47(6):507-515.
    [105]郭克莎.中国工业发展战略及政策的选择[J].中国社会科学,2004,1:30-41.
    [106]郭素君,张培刚.从观澜看深圳市特区外土地利用转型的必然性[J].规划师,2008,24(8):72-77.
    [107]韩明谟.农村社会学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001
    [108]何康.中国的乡镇企业[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004
    [109]贺欢欢,钱云,李璇,等.北京唐家岭“蚁族”聚居区居住环境与意愿调查[J].住区,2012(5):82-91.
    [110]贺晓东.城乡分配格局与城乡经济关系[J].中国农村经济,1988,03:1-12.
    [111]胡贤辉,杨钢桥,张霞,等.农村居民点用地数量变化及驱动机制研究:基于湖北仙桃市的实证[J].资源科学,2007,29(3):191-197.
    [112]黄贤金,彭补拙,张建新,等.区域产业结构调整与土地可持续利用关系研究[J].江苏国土资源,2002(4):16-18.
    [113]季凯文,武鹏.农村金融深化与农村经济增长的动态关系——基于中国农村统计数据的时间序列分析[J].经济评论,2008,(4):21-28
    [114]姜爱林,陈海秋.新中国50多年来宅基地立法的历史沿革[J].重庆工商大学学报:社会科学版,2007,24(2):91-95.
    [115]姜广辉,张凤荣,陈军伟,等.基于Logistic回归模型的北京山区农村居民点变化的驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(5):81-87.
    [116]姜广辉,张凤荣,周丁扬等.北京市农村居民点用地内部结构特征的区位分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(2):109-116.
    [117]姜隅琼.北京城中村调查(上)[N].上海证券报,2013-05-14(F03)
    [118]姜隅琼.北京城中村调查(下)[N].上海证券报,2013-05-16(F03)
    [119]康琪雪.西方竞租理论发展过程与最新拓展[J].经济经纬,2008(6):12-14.
    [120]孔祥斌,张凤荣,李玉兰,等.区域土地利用与产业结构变化互动关系研究[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):59-64.
    [121]孔祥智,李保江.农业增长方式的转变应以提高农民收入为取向[J].调研世界,1998,02:12-16.
    [122]雷振东.整合与重构—关中乡村聚落转型研究[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2009.45-55.
    [123]李君,李小建.河南中收入丘陵区村庄空心化微观分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2008,18(1):170-175.
    [124]李立.乡村聚落:形态、类型与演变—以江南地区为例[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2007.5-10.
    [125]李培林.巨变:村落的终结[J].中国社会科学,2002,1:168-180.
    [126]李善同,侯永志.我国经济发展阶段特征与“十五”时期产业发展的主要任务[J].管理世界,2001,(2):95-101.
    [127]李守经,钟涨宝.农村社会学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000
    [128]李翔.农户收入结构与农村产业结构变动相互关系的分析[J].农业现代化研究,1995,01:42-45.
    [129]李小建.还原论与农户地理研究[J].地理研究,2010,29(5):767-777.
    [130]李小建.农户地理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.50-65.
    [131]李秀彬.地区发展均衡性的可视化测度[J].地理科学,1999,19(3):254-257.
    [132]李秀彬.农地利用变化假说与相关的环境效应命题[J].地球科学进展,2008,23(11):1124-1129.
    [133]李周,包晓斌.中国环境库兹涅茨曲线的估计[J].科技导报,2002,4(21):57-58.
    [134]林坚,李尧.北京市农村居民点用地整理潜力研究[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(1):58-65.
    [135]林万龙.家庭承包制后中国农村公共产品供给制度诱致性变迁模式及影响因素研究[J].农业技术经济,2001,04:49-53.
    [136]刘成武,李秀彬.1980年以来中国农地利用变化的区域差异[J].地理学报,2006,02:139-145.
    [137]刘海玲,林彬,孔凡生.对日照市农村居民点用地整理模式的思考[J].山东国土资源,2007,23(1):34-35
    [138]刘梦琴.村庄终结:城中村及其改造研究[M].中国农业出版社,2010.
    [139]刘荣华,朱美平,叶建平,等. 探索宅基地整理新机制推进新农村建设步伐[C]//中国土地学会.2007年中国土地学会学术年会论文集,2007:1011-1016
    [140]刘彦随,刘玉,瞿荣新.中国农村空心化的地理研究与整治实践[J].地理学报,2009,64(10):1193-1202.
    [141]刘彦随.中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设[J].地理学报,2007,62(6):563-570
    [142]刘彦随.中国土地资源可持续利用与新农村建设研究[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2008
    [143]刘彦随.中国新农村建设地理论[M].科学出版社,2011.
    [144]刘洋.论我国农村居民点整理的激励机制[J].资源与产业,2008,(04):28-31.
    [145]刘洋.农村居民点整理的产权激励机制与操作路径[J].改革,2008,(06):92-96.
    [146]刘勇,吴次芳,杨志荣.中国农村居民点整理研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(3):68-73
    [147]刘志玲,张丽琴.农村居民点用地发展驱动力研究:以安徽省为例[J].农村经济,2006,(3):30-32.
    [148]龙花楼,李秀彬.长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型[J].地理学报,2005,(02):179-188.
    [149]龙花楼,李秀彬.区域土地利用转型分析——以长江沿线样带为例[J]自然资源学报,2001,17(2):144-149
    [150]龙花楼,李裕瑞,刘彦随.中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制[J].地理学报,2009,10:1203-1213
    [151]龙花楼,刘彦随,唐国平等.昆山市土地利用变化与新农村建设[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(6):790-796.
    [152]龙花楼,刘彦随,邹健.中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):426-434
    [153]龙花楼,邹健.我国快速城镇化进程中的乡村转型发展[J].苏州大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2011,32(4):97-100.
    [154]龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138.
    [155]龙花楼.区域土地利用转型与土地整理[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(2):133-140.
    [156]龙花楼.土地利用转型—土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(1):87-90.
    [157]龙花楼.中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实[J].地理学报,2006,(10):1093-1100
    [158]龙花楼.中国乡村转型发展与土地利用[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
    [159]鲁可荣,朱启臻.新农村建设背景下的后发型农村社区发展动力研究[J].农业经济问题,2008(8):46-49
    [160]陆大道,史培军,董光器.体现土地利用转型的重要理念[N].中国国土资源报,2006-07-17005
    [161]陆学艺.社会结构的变迁[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997
    [162]马继红.农安县耕地转型的机理研究[D].东北师范大学,2009.
    [163]马佳,韩桐魁.基于集约利用的农村居民点用地标准探讨——以湖北省孝感市孝南区为例[J].资源科学,2008,30(6):955-960.
    [164]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第25卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975
    [165]裴小林,黄宗智.集体土地所有制对中国经济转轨和农村工业化的贡献:一个资源配置模型的解说[J].中国乡村研究(第一辑),2003,218-250.
    [166]彭翊,罗忠华.阿朗索地租模型及其修正[J].中国房地信息,2003,10:28-29..
    [167]皮古,玉长,晓钦.福利经济学[M].上海财经大学出版社,2009.
    [168]乔家君,李小建,葛真.基于农户调查的村域商业经济活动空间研究[J].经济地理,2009,29(5):817-822.
    [169]乔家君,李小建.基于微观视角的河南省农区经济类型划分[J].经济地理,2008,28(5):832-836.
    [170]山本正三等,日本。农村空间区分,人文地理学研究,1987,Ⅺ:197-225.
    [171]四川省“五个一”工程重点理论文章课题组.农村土地资源向土地资本转变对农民收入的影响探析[J].农村经济,2004,10:52-54.
    [172]宋戈,孙丽娜,雷国平.基于计量地理模型的松嫩高平原土地利用特征及其空间布局[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):243-250.
    [173]宋均梅,陈利根.农村居民点用地整理与土地集约利用——江苏省农村居民点整理现状及思考[J].农村经济,2006,(3):26-29.
    [174]田光进,刘纪远,张增祥等.基于遥感与GIS的中国农村居民点规模分布特征[J].遥感学报,2002,6(4):307-313.
    [175]田光进.基于GIS的中国农村居民点用地分析[J].遥感信息,2002(68):31-34.
    [176]汪明峰,林小玲,宁越敏.外来人口,临时居所与城中村改造——-来自上海的调查报告[J].城市规划,2012(7):73-80.
    [177]王成新,姚士谋,陈彩虹.中国农村聚落空心化问题实证研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(3):257-262.
    [178]王海军.农村剩余劳动力就地转移与农村经济增长的实证分析[J].调研世界,2009,(11):12-14
    [179]王介勇,刘彦随,陈玉福.黄淮海平原农区典型村庄用地扩展及其动力机制[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1833-1840.
    [180]王亚林,赵红艳.生存资本考量下的文化追寻——对东北农村社区家族文化复兴个案研究[J].社会科学研究,2009,(2):111-117
    [181]吴文恒,牛叔文,等.黄淮海平原中部地区村庄格局演变实证分析[J].地理研究,2008,27(5):1017-1025.
    [182]夏健,王勇.农村土地制度创新对农村聚落形态演化的影响分析—以江苏省苏州市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(5):2116-2118.
    [183]邢谷锐,徐逸伦,郑颖.城市化进程中乡村聚落空间演变的类型与特征[J].经济地理,2007,27(6):932-935.
    [184]徐勇,沈洪泉,甘国辉,等.北京丰台区农村居住用地变化及与人口相关模型[J].地理学报,2002,57(5):569-576.
    [185]徐珍源,孔祥智.改革开放30年来农村宅基地制度变迁、评价及展望[J].价格月刊,2009,(08):3-5
    [186]闫小培,魏立华,周锐波.快速城市化地区城乡关系协调研究——以广州市“城中村”改造为例[J].城市规划,2004,28(3):30-38.
    [187]杨庆媛,张占录.大城市郊区农村居民点整理的目标和模式研究——以北京市顺义区为例[J].中国软科学,2003,(6):115-119.
    [188]杨小凯,永生.新兴古典经济学与超边际分析[M].社会科学文献出版社,2003.
    [189]杨永春,杨晓娟.1949-2005年中国河谷盆地型大城市空间扩展与土地利用结构转 型——以兰州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,01:37-49.
    [190]叶兴庆.论农村公共产品供给体制的改革[J].经济研究,1997,06:57-62.
    [191]叶艳妹,吴次芳.我国农村居民点用地整理的潜力、运作模式与政策选择[J].农业经济问题,1998,10:54-57
    [192]叶子荣,刘鸿渊.农村公共产品供给制度:历史、现状与重构[J].学术研究,2005,01:57-62.
    [193]余航,郑风田.城中村改造模式研究——北京市何各庄案例分析[J].农业经济问题,2011(4):86-91.
    [194]袁洁,杨钢桥,朱家彪.农村居民点用地变化驱动机制——基于湖北省孝南区农户调查的研究[J].经济地理,2008,28(6):991-994.
    [195]张车伟,王德文.农民收入问题性质的根本转变——分地区对农民收入结构和增长变化的考察[J].中国农村观察,2004,(1):2-13
    [196]张建武.广东省农村产业结构变动对农民收入的贡献及解释[J].中国农村经济,2000,11:20-24..
    [197]张来成,常欣.一个“蜗居”小村的美丽蜕变[N].中国信息报,2011,05-10(008)
    [198]张强,彭文英.从聚集到扩散新时期北京城乡区域发展格局研究[M]北京:经济科学出版社,2012
    [199]张五常.合约结构和非专有资源理论[J].经济解释——张五常经济论文选,2011,81-109
    [200]张五常.经济解释一张五常经济论文选[J].北京:商务印书馆,2000:427-428.
    [201]张小林.乡村空间系统以及演变研究—以苏南为例[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,1999.91-261.
    [202]张占录,张远索.基于现状调查的城市郊区农村居民点整理模式[J].地理研究,2010,(05):891-898
    [203]郑国.北京市制造业空间结构演化研究[J].人文地理,2006,21(5):84-88.
    [204]郑弘毅.农村城市化研究[M].南京大学出版社,1998.
    [205]郑思齐,张文忠.住房成本与通勤成本的空间互动关系[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(2):35-43.
    [206]周国华,贺艳华,唐承丽,等.中国农村聚居演变的驱动机制及态势分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(4):515-524
    [207]周靖祥.中国农村经济增长:“空巢化”转变及相机选择——来自1978-2007年的证据[J].财经研究,2010,(6):112-122
    [208]周奇.何各庄村农民住宅流转调查[N].北京日报,2009-04-13(003)
    [209]周庆华.黄土高原·河谷中的聚落—陕北地区人居环境空间形态模式研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.124-157.
    [210]周叔莲,郭克莎.地区城乡经济关系研究的内容和特点[J].经济学家,1994,02:19-27.
    [211]周晓唯,杨爽,李莉.二元结构制度变迁与“城中村”改造——兼论西安市“城中村”改造[J].西安电子科技大学学报:社会科学版,2006,16(1):56-61.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700