区域科技协同创新绩效的评价及提升途径研究
|
摘要
随着技术创新的复杂性增强、技术更新速度的加快以及全球化的发展，创新模式已突破传统的线性和链式模式，逐步演变为以多元主体协同互动为基础的协同创新模式，该模式既符合当前创新资源从封闭、分散到整合、协同的现实背景，同时也符合创新研究从独立创新、集成创新到开放式创新的理论研究背景，它成为推动创新的重要发展模式，由此受到了我国国家领导人的高度重视。但是，当前我国创新体系的协同创新深度和广度远远不够，并且在协同创新实践过程中缺乏协同创新理论指导，这对于我国推进协同创新发展建设非常不利。为此，本文从绩效评价和提升途径两个方面对区域科技协同创新进行研究，通过客观科学的评价我国区域科技协同创新绩效，掌握我国区域科技协同创新绩效水平状况，并在研究提升区域科技协同创新绩效的关键要素基础上，提出我国区域科技协同创新绩效的政策建议。这不仅丰富了区域科技协同创新理论，而且对于我国区域科技协同创新建设发展同样具有重要的现实意义。
本文研究首先界定区域科技协同创新绩效的内涵，通过系统的研究区域创新理论和绩效评价理论，提出了区域科技协同创新绩效评价概念和内涵。区域科技协同创新绩效评价就是依照区域科技协同创新的评价标准和的评价程序，运用科学的评价方法，采用特定的指标体系，按照评价的内容和标准对区域科技协同创新运行状态进行客观综合评判和系统分析的过程。
其次，通过文献研究及逻辑框架法构建了区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系，该指标体系根据协同创新的逻辑框架划分为四大评价目标模块：协同投入、协同过程、协同产出和协同影响，形成18个二级指标以及82个三级指标，并通过专家咨询、隶属度分析、相关分析、鉴别力分析和信度效度分析对指标体系进行筛选和检验。在确定区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系的基础上，根据指标体系结构多层次和指标值模糊性和随机性共存的特点，采用云层次分析法和云模型相结合的综合评价方法，构建了区域科技协同创新绩效评价模型。
再次，运用构建的区域科技协同创新的绩效评价指标体系和评价模型，对我国内地31个省级行政区域(不包括台湾、香港和澳门)的科技协同创新绩效进行实证分析和综合评价。实证分析得出我国区域科技协同创新绩效排名第一的是江苏，排名最后的是西藏。按照我国四大区域划分法，可以得出我国区域科技协同创新绩效可以划分为三个水平层次，第一层次是东部省市，处于全国领先水平，第二层次是中部和东北部省市，处于全国中游水平，第三层次是西部省市，处于全国落后水平。
之后，通过采用结构方程模型的方法确定提升区域科技协同创新绩效的关键要素，通过数据验证发现：协同创新能力、知识共享程度、领导支持、有效沟通、激励机制、协同创新意愿、资源依赖性、利益分配和组织氛围均能够正向的提升区域科技协同创新绩效，而且利益分配和协同创新能力为两个特别的关键要素。
最后，为了保障区域科技协同创新绩效评价科学化、规范化，本文从评价主体的选择，评价实施的流程和评价的保障机制三个方面对区域科技协同创新绩效评价制度安排进行了深入研究。同时，针对我国区域科技协同创新存在的主要问题，提出了通过统筹资金投入体系、扶持科技中介发展、完善政府的政策支持体系、搭建多方联动的组织体系、规范创新利益分配、构建科技协同创新人才培养体系、营造良好的协同创新组织氛围和建设多层次沟通协调体系等系列政策建议来进一步提升我国区域科技协同创新绩效水平，完善我国区域科技协同创新的建设。
本文以提升我国区域科技协同创新绩效水平为目标，研究了区域科技协同创新绩效评价与提升途径两方面。构建了一套科学合理的区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系，建立了区域科技协同创新绩效评价模型，并选取了我国各省（直辖市）为区域科技协同创新绩效评价实证对象，研究了提升区域科技协同创新绩效的关键要素，以上研究极大的丰富了区域科技协同创新理论和现代绩效评价理论。
With the increasing complexity of technology innovation、the accelerating speedof technology update and globalization, the innovation mode has already broken thetraditional linear and chain mode, and gradually evolved into a synergistic interactionwith multiple subjects based on synergy innovation mode. This mode is consistentwith the current resources for innovation from a closed, discrete to integrated,synergy realistic background, but also meet the innovative research from independentinnovation, open innovation, synergy innovation to the theoretical background, itbecomes important mode to promote innovation, so it paid more attention by the twonational leaders of Hu Jingtao and Xi Jinping. But China's current innovation systemis not deeply and widely enough for synergy innovation and lack of theoreticaldirection in the process of practice, it is unfavorable to the development of synergyinnovation. Therefor, this paper deals with the regional science and technologysynergy innovation in two aspects: performance evaluation and promotion ways. Then,grasping the synergy innovation performance level through the scientific evaluationof China’ s regional science and technology synergy innovation performance. Andbased on the research of promotion ways, some policy recommendations is proposed.This not only enriches the regional science and technology synergy innovation theory,but also has important practical significance for the construction of regional scienceand technology synergy innovation of our country.
This paper firstly defines the meaning of regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance, proposes regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance evaluation concept and content by studying the theory ofregional innovation systems and performance evaluation theory. Regional science andtechnology synergy innovation performance means in accordance with the regionalscience and technology synergy innovation criteria and evaluation procedures, usingscientific evaluation methods and particular index system, in accordance withevaluation content and criteria to evaluate the run condition of regional science andtechnology synergy innovation.
Secondly, based on the literature research and logical framework approach, theregional science and technology synergy innovation performance evaluation indexsystem was built, the index system consists of four modules: synergy input, synergy process, synergy output and synergy effect. There are18secondary indicators and82three indicators. Then through expert advice, membership analysis, correlationanalysis, discrimination analysis, and reliability and validity analysis indicatorsscreening and testing. Based on the built of the regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance evaluation index system, A comprehensiveevaluation model was built by cloud AHP model combines cloud model accordingwith the multilevel architecture and fuzziness and randomness of indicator values.
To verify the performance evaluation of regional science and technologycollaborative innovation operability and effectiveness of the method, the paper onChina's31provincial-level administrative regions in Mainland (not including Taiwan,Hong Kong and Macao) of regional technology innovation performance collaborativeevaluation and comparison, results of regional Technology innovation collaborativeinnovation performance evaluation of regional scientific and technologicalcollaboration ranked first in Jiangsu, ranking last in Tibet. According to China'spresent eastern, central, northeast and west four economic zoning method, we arriveat the current performance of regional science and technology collaborativeinnovation can be divided into three horizontal levels, the first level is the easternprovinces and cities in the country relative to the lead, the first two levels in thecentral and northeastern provinces, the middle level in the country, and the third levelis the western provinces in the country is relatively backward.
Thereafter, by using structural equation modeling method, the regional scienceand technology synergy innovation performance promotion ways in-depth study,through the study found: synergy innovation capability, knowledge sharing degree,support of the leadership, effective communication, incentive mechanism, synergyinnovation willingness, resource dependency, the distribution of benefits andorganizational climate were able to positively promote regional science andtechnology collaborative innovation performance, and the distribution of benefits andcollaborative innovation capacity of two particularly important ways.
Finally, in order to ensure regional science and technology synergy innovationperformance evaluation scientific and standardized, the paper from the evaluation ofthe main selection, the process of the assessment implementation and the safeguardmechanism three aspects to the in-depth study regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance evaluation arrangements. Meanwhile, in arriving atour regional science and technology synergy innovation are the main issues, the paperpresent through an integrated system of funding to support the development of science and technology intermediary, improve the government's policy support system, tobuild multi-linkage of the organizational system to regulate the distribution ofbenefits innovation, synergy innovation to build scientific and technologicalpersonnel training system, to create a good atmosphere and building synergyinnovation organizational communication and coordination system of multi-levelseries of measures to further enhance our regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance, improvement of regional science and technology synergyinnovation of the building.
The paper’s main target is enhance the regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance and it studies performance evaluation and impact factors ofthe regional science and technology synergy innovation. The paper built the regionalscience and technology synergy innovation performance evaluation index system andevaluation model. Based on the above, selected China's provinces (Municipalities) tocarry out the regional science and technology synergy innovation performanceevaluation empirical study, then, study the promotion ways of regional science andtechnology synergy innovation performance, these studies greatly enriched theregional science and technology synergy innovation theory and modern performanceevaluation theory.
本文研究首先界定区域科技协同创新绩效的内涵，通过系统的研究区域创新理论和绩效评价理论，提出了区域科技协同创新绩效评价概念和内涵。区域科技协同创新绩效评价就是依照区域科技协同创新的评价标准和的评价程序，运用科学的评价方法，采用特定的指标体系，按照评价的内容和标准对区域科技协同创新运行状态进行客观综合评判和系统分析的过程。
其次，通过文献研究及逻辑框架法构建了区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系，该指标体系根据协同创新的逻辑框架划分为四大评价目标模块：协同投入、协同过程、协同产出和协同影响，形成18个二级指标以及82个三级指标，并通过专家咨询、隶属度分析、相关分析、鉴别力分析和信度效度分析对指标体系进行筛选和检验。在确定区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系的基础上，根据指标体系结构多层次和指标值模糊性和随机性共存的特点，采用云层次分析法和云模型相结合的综合评价方法，构建了区域科技协同创新绩效评价模型。
再次，运用构建的区域科技协同创新的绩效评价指标体系和评价模型，对我国内地31个省级行政区域(不包括台湾、香港和澳门)的科技协同创新绩效进行实证分析和综合评价。实证分析得出我国区域科技协同创新绩效排名第一的是江苏，排名最后的是西藏。按照我国四大区域划分法，可以得出我国区域科技协同创新绩效可以划分为三个水平层次，第一层次是东部省市，处于全国领先水平，第二层次是中部和东北部省市，处于全国中游水平，第三层次是西部省市，处于全国落后水平。
之后，通过采用结构方程模型的方法确定提升区域科技协同创新绩效的关键要素，通过数据验证发现：协同创新能力、知识共享程度、领导支持、有效沟通、激励机制、协同创新意愿、资源依赖性、利益分配和组织氛围均能够正向的提升区域科技协同创新绩效，而且利益分配和协同创新能力为两个特别的关键要素。
最后，为了保障区域科技协同创新绩效评价科学化、规范化，本文从评价主体的选择，评价实施的流程和评价的保障机制三个方面对区域科技协同创新绩效评价制度安排进行了深入研究。同时，针对我国区域科技协同创新存在的主要问题，提出了通过统筹资金投入体系、扶持科技中介发展、完善政府的政策支持体系、搭建多方联动的组织体系、规范创新利益分配、构建科技协同创新人才培养体系、营造良好的协同创新组织氛围和建设多层次沟通协调体系等系列政策建议来进一步提升我国区域科技协同创新绩效水平，完善我国区域科技协同创新的建设。
本文以提升我国区域科技协同创新绩效水平为目标，研究了区域科技协同创新绩效评价与提升途径两方面。构建了一套科学合理的区域科技协同创新绩效评价指标体系，建立了区域科技协同创新绩效评价模型，并选取了我国各省（直辖市）为区域科技协同创新绩效评价实证对象，研究了提升区域科技协同创新绩效的关键要素，以上研究极大的丰富了区域科技协同创新理论和现代绩效评价理论。
With the increasing complexity of technology innovation、the accelerating speedof technology update and globalization, the innovation mode has already broken thetraditional linear and chain mode, and gradually evolved into a synergistic interactionwith multiple subjects based on synergy innovation mode. This mode is consistentwith the current resources for innovation from a closed, discrete to integrated,synergy realistic background, but also meet the innovative research from independentinnovation, open innovation, synergy innovation to the theoretical background, itbecomes important mode to promote innovation, so it paid more attention by the twonational leaders of Hu Jingtao and Xi Jinping. But China's current innovation systemis not deeply and widely enough for synergy innovation and lack of theoreticaldirection in the process of practice, it is unfavorable to the development of synergyinnovation. Therefor, this paper deals with the regional science and technologysynergy innovation in two aspects: performance evaluation and promotion ways. Then,grasping the synergy innovation performance level through the scientific evaluationof China’ s regional science and technology synergy innovation performance. Andbased on the research of promotion ways, some policy recommendations is proposed.This not only enriches the regional science and technology synergy innovation theory,but also has important practical significance for the construction of regional scienceand technology synergy innovation of our country.
This paper firstly defines the meaning of regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance, proposes regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance evaluation concept and content by studying the theory ofregional innovation systems and performance evaluation theory. Regional science andtechnology synergy innovation performance means in accordance with the regionalscience and technology synergy innovation criteria and evaluation procedures, usingscientific evaluation methods and particular index system, in accordance withevaluation content and criteria to evaluate the run condition of regional science andtechnology synergy innovation.
Secondly, based on the literature research and logical framework approach, theregional science and technology synergy innovation performance evaluation indexsystem was built, the index system consists of four modules: synergy input, synergy process, synergy output and synergy effect. There are18secondary indicators and82three indicators. Then through expert advice, membership analysis, correlationanalysis, discrimination analysis, and reliability and validity analysis indicatorsscreening and testing. Based on the built of the regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance evaluation index system, A comprehensiveevaluation model was built by cloud AHP model combines cloud model accordingwith the multilevel architecture and fuzziness and randomness of indicator values.
To verify the performance evaluation of regional science and technologycollaborative innovation operability and effectiveness of the method, the paper onChina's31provincial-level administrative regions in Mainland (not including Taiwan,Hong Kong and Macao) of regional technology innovation performance collaborativeevaluation and comparison, results of regional Technology innovation collaborativeinnovation performance evaluation of regional scientific and technologicalcollaboration ranked first in Jiangsu, ranking last in Tibet. According to China'spresent eastern, central, northeast and west four economic zoning method, we arriveat the current performance of regional science and technology collaborativeinnovation can be divided into three horizontal levels, the first level is the easternprovinces and cities in the country relative to the lead, the first two levels in thecentral and northeastern provinces, the middle level in the country, and the third levelis the western provinces in the country is relatively backward.
Thereafter, by using structural equation modeling method, the regional scienceand technology synergy innovation performance promotion ways in-depth study,through the study found: synergy innovation capability, knowledge sharing degree,support of the leadership, effective communication, incentive mechanism, synergyinnovation willingness, resource dependency, the distribution of benefits andorganizational climate were able to positively promote regional science andtechnology collaborative innovation performance, and the distribution of benefits andcollaborative innovation capacity of two particularly important ways.
Finally, in order to ensure regional science and technology synergy innovationperformance evaluation scientific and standardized, the paper from the evaluation ofthe main selection, the process of the assessment implementation and the safeguardmechanism three aspects to the in-depth study regional science and technologysynergy innovation performance evaluation arrangements. Meanwhile, in arriving atour regional science and technology synergy innovation are the main issues, the paperpresent through an integrated system of funding to support the development of science and technology intermediary, improve the government's policy support system, tobuild multi-linkage of the organizational system to regulate the distribution ofbenefits innovation, synergy innovation to build scientific and technologicalpersonnel training system, to create a good atmosphere and building synergyinnovation organizational communication and coordination system of multi-levelseries of measures to further enhance our regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance, improvement of regional science and technology synergyinnovation of the building.
The paper’s main target is enhance the regional science and technology synergyinnovation performance and it studies performance evaluation and impact factors ofthe regional science and technology synergy innovation. The paper built the regionalscience and technology synergy innovation performance evaluation index system andevaluation model. Based on the above, selected China's provinces (Municipalities) tocarry out the regional science and technology synergy innovation performanceevaluation empirical study, then, study the promotion ways of regional science andtechnology synergy innovation performance, these studies greatly enriched theregional science and technology synergy innovation theory and modern performanceevaluation theory.
引文
[1] Frank Moulaert, Farid Sekia. Territorial innovation models: a critical survey.Regional Studies,2003,37(3):289-302
[2] Alfred Weber.李刚剑,陈志人,张英保译.工业区位论.商务印书馆,2010
[3] Graham R. Marshall. Economics for Collaborative Environmental Management:Renegotiating the Commons. Earthscan,2005
[4] Hoover,E.M. An introduction to regional economics. New York:Knopf,1971
[5] F. Perroux. Economic space: theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics,1950,64(1):89-104
[6] F Moulaert, F Djellal. Information technology consultancy firms: economies ofagglomeration from a wide-area perspective.Urban Studies,1995,32(1):105-122
[7] A Malmberg, P Maskell. Towards an explanation of regional specialization andindustry agglomeration. European planning studies,1997,5(1):25-41
[8] Michael E. Porter. Location, competition, and economic development: Localclusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1):15-34
[9]徐占忱,何明升.接近性、互动网络与区域企业集群创新.科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(6):87-91
[10] Victor Gilsing, Bart Nooteboom. Density and strength of ties in innovationnetworks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European managementreview,2005,2:179-197
[11] Cooke, Philip. Regional innovation systems: origin of the species. InternationalJournal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development,2008,1(3):393-409
[12]李青,李文军,郭金龙.区域创新视角下的产业发展.商务印书馆,2004
[13] Michael Polanyi. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.Routledge,1962
[14] Lundvall B-A., Johnson B. The learning economy, Journal of Industry Studies.1994,1:23-42
[15]祝洵.区域品牌的形成——一个基于政府与市场关系理论的研究.浙江大学硕士学位论文.2006
[16] Brian Maskell. The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: AnInternational Journal,2001,6(1):5-11
[17]胡恩华,单红梅,刘光平,毛绚澜.企业集群创新行为影响因素的实证研究.研究与发展管理,2009,21(2):88-93
[18] Paul Tracey, Gordon L. Clark. Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy:Rethinking Cluster of Innovation. Growth and Change,2003,34(1):1-16
[19] Persaud, A. Enhancing synergistic innovative capability in multinationalcorporations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product InnovationManagement,2005,22:412-429.
[20] Rafael Besen, Frank Siqueira. A Mechanism for Semantic Web ServicesDiscovery in Mobile Environments.The Tenth International Conference onNetworks,2011
[21] Bengt-Ake Lundvall， Bj rn Johnson, Esben Sloth Andersen, Bent Dalum.National systems of production, innovation and competence building. ResearchPolicy,2002,31(2):213–231
[22] Castells M, Hall P. Technopoles of the world: The making oftwenty-first-century industrial complexes. Routledge,2009
[23] Daly H E, Farley J. Ecological economics: principles and applications. IslandPress,2010
[24] Books, LLC. Industrial Ecology: Environmental Economics, Biomimicry, Iso14000, Ecological Economics, Rebound Effect, Efficient Energy Use.GeneralBooks,2011
[25] K Fukuda,C Watanabe. Japanese and US perspectives on the national innovationecosystem.Technology in Society.2008,30(1):49–63
[26]韩福荣.质量生态学研究.世界标准化与质量管理.2005,(3):4-6
[27]陈先红.“关系生态说”的提出及其对公关理论的创新.2004,(3):86-88
[28] Johnson N, Lux T. Financial systems: Ecology and economics. Nature,2011,469(7330):302-303
[29] Ng, J.W.P.,Azarmi, N., Leida, M., Saffre, F., Afzal, A.,Yoo, P.D.. TheIntelligent Campus (iCampus): End-to-end learning lifecycle of a knowledgeecosystem.Intelligent Environments (IE),2010Sixth International Conference on.IEEE,2010:332-337
[30]孙振领,李后卿.关于知识生态系统的理论研究.图书与情报,2008,(5):22-27
[31] Moore’s J F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age ofBusiness Ecosystems.Wiley,1996
[32]杜国柱,舒华英.企业商业生态系统理论研究现状及展望.经济与管理研究,2007,(7):75-79
[33]钟耕深,崔祯珍.商业生态系统理论及其发展方向.东岳论丛,2009,30(6):27-33
[34] Song C, Guo S. Research on the Construction and Method System of EnterpriseInformation Ecosystem. Mechanical Engineering and Technology,2012:671-677
[35]王云梅.信息生态系统及其有效机制的构建.图书馆工作与研究,2010,(2):25-28
[36]单汨源,李果,陈丹等.基于生态位理论的企业竞争战略研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(3):159-163
[37]李勇,郑垂勇.企业生态位与竞争战略.当代财经,2007,(1):51-56
[38]薛海涛.基于企业生态位的企业竞争战略选择.天津大学硕士学位论文,2012
[39] Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Gupta A, et al. Understanding patterns oftechnology evolution: An ecosystem perspective.39th Annual HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06),2006,8:189a-189a
[40] Ron Adner. Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem.Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107
[41]石新泓.创新生态系统: IBM Inside.商业评论,2006,(8):60-65
[42]刘友金,罗发友.企业技术创新集群行为的行为生态学研究——一个分析框架的提出与构思.中国软科学,2004,(1):68-72
[43]傅羿芳,朱斌.高科技产业集群持续创新生态体系研究.科学学研究,2004,22(z1):128-135
[44]王晓凤,赵红,周庞等.我国高新技术产业发展的生态学思考.数量经济技术经济研究,2001,18(7):26-29
[45]黄鲁成.区域技术创新生态系统的特征.中国科技论坛,2003,(1):23-26.
[46] Wiig H, Wood M. What comprise a Regional Innovation System? An EmpiricalStudy,1999.
[47] Cooke P, Gomez Uranga M, Etxebarria G. Regional innovation systems:Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy,1997,26(4):475-491.
[48]胡志坚,苏靖.关于区域创新系统研究.科技日报,1999-10-16
[49]付晓东,林勇,张敦富,胡铁成,孙久文.知识经济与区域经济.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000.
[50]陈晓红,解海涛.基于"四主体动态模型"的中小企业协同创新体系研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(8):37-43.
[51]杨龙,戴扬.地方政府合作在区域合作中的作用.西北师大学报(社会科学版),2009,46(5):57-63
[52] Thorgren S, Wincent J, rtqvist D. Designing interorganizational networks forinnovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation andgovernance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2009,26(3):148-166
[53] Cooke P, Leydesdorff L. Regional development in the knowledge-basedeconomy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2006,31(1):5-15
[54] Meijers E. Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network ofcities more than the sum of the parts?. Urban studies,2005,42(4):765-781
[55] Pierre Barbaroux. Identifying collaborative innovation capabilities withinknowledge-intensive environments: Insights from the ARPANET project.European Journal of Innovation Management,2012,15(2):232-258
[56]王海建.基于协同创新思想的大学生协同创新能力培养.中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2012,28(3):105-108
[57]孟宪文,丁晋中,李惠等.企业技术创新能力与区域技术创新能力的协同性评价.生产力研究,2009,(8):143-145
[58]邢建军,李洋.区域创新网络要素间协同能力的测度——基于知识资本扩张路径.标准科学,2010,(4):78-82
[59]王大伟.区域自主创新活动中协同创新能力评价研究.安徽:合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2011
[60] Geringer J M. Selection of Partners for International Joint Venture.BusinessQuarterly,1988,53(1):55-62
[61] Lewis J D. Making strategic alliances work. Research-Technology Management,1990,33(6):12-15.
[62]福克纳, C.鲍曼.竞争战略.北京:中信出版社,1997
[63] Cauley de la Sierra M. Managing global alliances: Key steps for successfulcollaboration(The Economist Intelligence Unit). Addison-Wesley PublishingCompany, Wokingham England,1995
[64] Brouthers K D, Brouthers L E, Wilkinson T J. Strategic alliances: choose yourpartners. Long range planning,1995,28(3):2-25
[65] Büchel B. Managing partner relations in joint ventures. MIT Sloan ManagementReview,2003,44(4):91-95
[66]杨建君,梅晓芳,陈曼等.合作创新的伙伴选择:一个综合评价体系.科技管理研究,2009,29(1):6-9
[67]冯振环,罗永泰.虚拟型学习团队合作伙伴选择的结构化系统解决方案.科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(2):126-129
[68]桂黄宝,赵付民.基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)的合作技术创新伙伴选择研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(9):50-54
[69]刘朝,龙舟.基于技术标准的绿色农产品联盟伙伴选择研究.科技管理研究,2008,(6):467-470
[70]梁家强,韩学功.基于证据理论的战略联盟合作伙伴选择研究.华东经济管理,2010,24(12):97-100
[71]刘宝剑,吴春旭.基于蚁群算法的虚拟企业合作伙伴选择.计算机应用与软件,2008,25(1):127-128
[72]薛伟贤,张娟.高技术企业技术联盟互惠共生的合作伙伴选择研究.研究与发展管理,2010,22(1):82-89
[73]楼高翔,万宁.基于供应链的技术创新协同伙伴选择与评价.科技进步与对策,2011,28(24):153-155
[74]游静,刘伟.基于平衡计分卡和广义熵算法的IT合作伙伴选择方法.科技管理研究,2007,27(7):218-220
[75]王雄,岳意定.基于混合目标模糊优选动态规划的动态物流联盟伙伴选择模型.软科学,2008,22(2):18-21
[76]戴彬,屈锡华,李宏伟等.基于模糊综合评价的技术创新合作伙伴选择模型研究.科技进步与对策,2011,28(1):120-123
[77]罗剑锋.基于动态模糊评价的通信运营商合作伙伴选择模型及实证研究.财经理论与实践,2012,33(4):91-95
[78] Simatupang T M, Sridharan R. The collaboration index: a measure for supplychain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution&LogisticsManagement,2005,35(1):44-62
[79] Fan Decheng, Tang Xiaoxu. Performance evaluation of industry-university-research cooperative technological innovation based on fuzzy integral.International Conference on Management Science&Engineering,2009:1789-1795
[80]张爱琴,陈红.产学研知识创新网络的协同创新评价研究.中北大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(4):44-47
[81]李刚.供应链协同创新的绩效测评及其应用研究.中国科技资源导刊,2011,43(2):59-67
[82]路正南,刘春奇,王国栋.光伏产业链协同绩效评价指标体系研究.科技与经济,2013,26(1):106-110
[83] Bonaccorsi A, Piccaluga A. A theoretical framework for the evaluation ofuniversity‐industry relationships. R&D Management,1994,24(3):229-247
[84]张翠华,周红,赵淼等.供应链协同绩效评价及其应用.东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(6):706-708
[85]柯飞帆,宁宣熙.基于神经网络的合作企业资源协同评价的研究.中国制造业信息化,2006,35(1):17-20
[86]顾兢晶.供应链协同管理中知识共享机制的研究.合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2007
[87]季宇. U/I知识联盟协同创新绩效的数理分析模型.大连交通大学学报,2007,28(2):84-87
[88] Bhagwat R, Sharma M K. Performance measurement of supply chainmanagement using the analytical hierarchy process. Production Planning andControl,2007,18(8):666-680
[89] Philbin S. Process model for university-industry research collaboration.European Journal of Innovation Management,2008,11(4):488-521
[90]晏斌.供应链协同综合绩效评价研究.江苏大学硕士学位论文,2008
[91]王庆金,王阳,周雪等.科技中介与区域创新主体协同发展研究评析.价值工程,2010,29(28):9-10
[92]王玉梅.复合DEA方法的知识创新联盟系统协同发展评价.中国科技论坛,2010,(8):26-31
[93]赵川,杨洁,曾强等.遗传算法改进的BP神经网络在协同创新评价中的应用.机械,2010,37(8):5-9
[94]乔金杰,赵秋莲.农业技术创新主体协同绩效分析及主体确立.安徽农业科学,2011,39(18):11225-11227
[95]冯博,索玮岚,樊治平等.考虑多指标模糊关联的服务制造网络协同绩效评价方法.中国管理科学,2012,20(4):95-103
[96]徐潇.基于云模型的海尔白色家电供应链绩效评价研究.中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2012
[97]杜栋,胡慧玲.产学研协同创新的绩效评价研究.中国科技资源导刊,2013,(1):73-76
[98]孔祥浩,丁萌,周聚等.基于压缩感知的协同创新评价方法研究.价值工程,2013,(5):1-3.
[99]孟庆松,韩文秀.复合系统协调度模型研究.天津大学学报,2000,33(4):444-446.
[100] Ensign P C. The concept of fit in organizational research. International JournalOrganization Theory and Behavior,2001,4(3-4):287-306
[101]徐浩鸣,徐建中,康姝丽等.中国国有医药制造产业组织系统协同度模型及实证分析.中国科技论坛,2003,(1):113-117
[102]陈丹宇.长三角区域创新系统中的协同效应研究.浙江大学博士学位论文.2010
[103] Eva M． Mora-Valentin,Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, Luis A. Guerras-Martin.Determing factors in the success of R&D organizations.Research Policy,2004,33:17-40
[104] Plewa C, Quester P. Key drivers of university-industry relationships: the role oforganisational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of ServicesMarketing,2007,21(5):370-382.
[105] Butler James R A,Hill Rosemary, Wallace marilyn. Cooperative research:anexample from the wet tropics of queenland. International Journal ofInterdisciplinary Social Sciences,2010,6(5):139-154.
[106]武海峰,牛勇平.山东省产学研合作绩效影响因素的实证分析.东岳论丛,2011,23(12):163-166
[107]吴悦,顾新.产学研协同创新的知识协同过程研究.中国科技论坛，2012,(10):17-23.
[108]肖丁丁,朱桂龙.产学研合作创新效率及其影响因素的实证研究.科研管理，2013,34(1):11-18.
[109]张海滨.高校产学研协同创新的影响因素及机制构建.福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,27(3):104-107.
[110]姚艳虹,杜梦华.科技协同创新演进规律及其影响因素分析.湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2013,27(3):37-41.
[111] Lawrence P., Lorsch, J. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developingand testing multiple contingency models.Management Science,2006,42(5):693-712
[112] Collins C.J, Smith K.G. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role ofhuman resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms.Academy of management journal,2006,49(3):544-560.
[113]水常青,郑刚,许庆瑞.影响中国大中型工业企业协同创新要素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(12):44-48.
[114]杨丽伟.供应链企业协同自主创新研究.武汉理工大学博士学位论文,2008
[115]杜宝苍,李朝明.高新技术企业协同知识创新绩效影响因素实证研究.科技管理研究,2013,33(12):172-176.
[116]刘红胜,王延娜,颜永才等.基于ISM的制造企业供应链协同绩效关键影响因素分析.当代经济,2011,(11):154-155
[117] Cooke P, Morgan K. Learning Through Networking: regional innovation and thelessons of Baden-Württemberg. Cardiff: Regional Industrial Research,1990.
[118] Metcalfe J S. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionaryframework. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1995,19(1):25-46
[119] Braczyk, Hans-Joachim, Philip Cooke, and Martin Heidenreich. Regionalinnovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Routledge,1998.
[120] Cook P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G. Regional Systems of Innovation:AnEvolutionary Perspective. Environment and Planning A,1998,30:1563-1584
[121]陈光,王永杰.区域技术创新系统研究论纲——兼论中国西部地区的技术创新.世界科技研究与发展,1999,21(1):70-74
[122]盖文启.创新网络——区域经济发展新思维.北京:北京大学出版社,2002
[123]赵修卫.建设区域创新系统促进区域经济发展.科技管理研究,2000(4):23-25
[124]胡志坚,苏靖.区域创新系统理论的提出与发展.中国科技论坛,1999,(6):20-23
[125] Doloreux D. What we should know about regional systems of innovation.Technology in society,2002,24(3):243-263
[126] Cooke P, Boekholt P, T dtling F. Regional Innovation Systems: designing forthe future. Final Report to DG12of the REGIS TSER project, Centre forAdvanced Studies in the Social Sciences, University of Wales, Cardiff.,1998.
[127] Archibugi, Daniele, Jeremy Howells, and Jonathan Michie. Innovation policy ina global economy[M]. Cambridge University Press,1999.
[128] Braczyk, Hans-Joachim, Philip Cooke, and Martin Heidenreich.Regionalinnovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Routledge,1998
[129] Asheim B T, Isaksen A. Regional innovation systems: the integration of local‘sticky’and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):77-86
[130] Isaksen A. Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrialdevelopment possible in the global economy?. Canadian Journal of RegionalScience,2001,24(1):101-120
[131] Autio E. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. EuropeanPlanning Studies,1998,6(2):131-140
[132] T dtling F, Trippl M. One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regionalinnovation policy approach. Research policy,2005,34(8):1203-1219
[133] Padmore T, Gibson H. Modelling systems of innovation II:A framework forindustrial cluster analysis in regions. Research policy,1998,26(6):625-641
[134] Radosevic S. Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe:determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):87-96
[135] Guth M. Innovation, social inclusion and coherent regional development: a newdiamond for a socially inclusive innovation policy in regions. EuropeanPlanning Studies,2005,13(2):333-349
[136]王稼琼,绳丽惠，陈鹏飞.区域创新体系的功能与特征分析.中国软科学,1999(2):53-55,63
[137]官建成,刘顺忠.区域创新系统测度的研究框架和内容.中国科技论坛,2003,(2):24-26
[138]陈琪,徐东.区域创新体系的系统结构研究.科技进步与对策,2007,24(8):45-47
[139] Folan P, Browne J. A review of performance measurement: Towardsperformance management. Computers in Industry,2005,56(7):663-680
[140] Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K. Performance measurement system design: aliterature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations&Production Management,2005,25(12):1228-1263
[141] Beamon B M. Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods.International journal of production economics,1998,55(3):281-294
[142] Brewer P C, Speh T W. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chainperformance. Journal of Business logistics,2000,21(1):75-94
[143] Avkiran N K, Rowlands T. How to better identify the true managerialperformance: State of the art using DEA. Omega,2008,36(2):317-324
[144]胡季英,冯英浚.企业绩效评价理论研究述评与展望.现代管理科学,2005,(9):29-31
[145]徐倩.绩效评价.北京:中国标准出版社,2008
[146]颜艳梅.公共工程项目绩效评价.湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006
[147]罗伯特·卡普兰,大卫·诺顿.平衡记分卡.广东经济出版社,2004
[148] Ansoff H I. Corporate strategy. NY: McGraw-Hill,1965.
[149]彭纪生,吴林海.论技术协同创新模式及建构.研究与发展管理,2000,12(5):12-16
[150]郑刚,梁欣如.全面协同:创新致胜之道——技术与非技术要素全面协同机制研究.科学学研究,2006,24(z1):268-273
[151]陈劲,谢芳,贾丽娜等.企业集团内部协同创新机理研究.管理学报,2006,3(6):733-740
[152]徐力行,毕淑青.关于产业创新协同战略框架的构想.山西财经大学学报,2007,29(4):51-55
[153]顾菁,薛伟贤.高技术产业协同创新研究.科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):84-89.
[154]杨洁.低碳经济背景下区域产业协同创新体系研究——以长株潭为例.广西社会科学,2013,(7):82-84
[155]陈文俊.长株潭区域协同创新体系建设研究.湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,8(3):82-87
[156]肖德云,李伟保,王恕立等.国家创新体系协同学习的一个分析框架.管理科学,2009,22(6):29-37
[157] PA Gloor. Swarm Creativity:Competitive Advantage through CollaborativeInnovation Networks. New York: Oxford University Press,2006.
[158]杨耀武,张仁开.长三角产业集群协同创新战略研究.第七届中国软科学年会论文集.2009:136-139,144.
[159]刘桂花,宋承祥,刘弘等.云发生器的软件实现.计算机应用研究,2007,24(1):46-48.
[160]熊立,梁樑,王国华等.层次分析法中数字标度的选择与评价方法研究.系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):72-79
[161]孙才志,林学钰.基于层次分析的模糊一致性判断矩阵及其应用.模糊系统与数学,2002,16(3):59-63
[162] Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York: Mc Gtaw Hill,1980
[163] Alavia.M., Tiwana.A. Knowledge Integration in Virtual team: the Potential Roleof KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science andTechnology.2002,53(12):1029-1037
[164] Sivadas E, Dwyer F. R. An examination of organizational factors influencingnew product success in internal and alliance-based processes.The Journal ofMarketing,2000,64(1):31-49.
[165]游振华.种子产业链企业合作绩效影响因素实证研究.华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[166]徐志云.知识合作创新的方式和影响因素与绩效关系经验研究.河北工业大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[167]于冬.企业合作创新绩效影响因素分析.大连理工大学博士学位论文,2008
[168]张媛媛,张宗益.创新环境、创新能力与创新绩效的系统性研究——基于面板数据的经验分析.科技管理研究.2009,29(12):91-93
[169]曲怡颖,甄杰,任浩.创新集群内企业声誉对创新能力及创新绩效的作用.软科学,2012,26(1):11-15.
[170] David J Teece. Capturing Value from knowledge Assets: The New Economy,Markets for Know-how and Intangible Assets. California Management Review.1998(40):55-79.
[171] Grayr J. Organization Climate and Project Success. International Journal ofProject Management,2001,(19):103-109.
[172]朱少英,齐二石,徐渝.变革性领导、团队氛围、知识共享与团队创新绩效的关系.软科学,2008,22(11):1-4.
[173] Balachandra,R.and Friair, J.H.Factors for success in R&D projects and newproduct innovation: a contextual framework. Engineering Management, IEEETransactions on,1997,44(3):276-287.
[174] Jeffrey,K.P. And Dennis,P.S. Critical factors in successful projectimplementation．IEEE Transactions on engineering management,1987:8-22
[175]张大伟.工作价值观视角下服务行业组织创新气氛与创新绩效的关系研究.山东大学硕士学位论文.2011
[176] Beckett-Canmmta,E. J., Carnarata,M．R．And Barker, R. T．Integrating internaland external customer relationships through relationship management： astrategic response to a changing global environment． Journal of BusinessResearch,1998(41):71-81
[177] Rothwell,R. Successful industrial innovation：Critical factors for the1990s．R&D Management,1992,22(3):221-239
[178] Michael D.Santoro.Success breeds success: the linkage between relationshipintensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures.The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2000,(11):255-273.
[179]刘衡,李垣,李西垚.关系资本、组织间沟通和创新绩效的关系研究.科学学研究,2010,28(12):1912-1919.
[180]汪秀婷,杜海波,江澄.技术创新网络中核心企业对创新绩效影响：沟通和信任的中介作用研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(12):37-44
[181]安新颖,冷伏海.基于结构方程模型的企业自主创新能力研究.科技进步与对策,2008,25(4):63-66.
[182] Hansen M. T., Nohria N.and Tierney T.What’s your strategy for managingknowledge?. Harvard Business Review,1999,77(2):106-116.
[183]吴邦正,李芳.知识员工激励方式与组织创新绩效的实证研究——以中关村高科技企业为例.兰州学刊,2013,(6):105-114.
[184] Vaaland,T and Hakansson,H. Exploring interorganizational conflict in complexprojects. Industrial Marketing Management,2003(32):127-138
[185] Inkpen A C.A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: Competition,cooperation, and relative scope.Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(7):775-779.
[186] Narula R. R&D collaboration by SMEs:some analytical issues and evidence.Cooperative strategies and alliances,2002:543-568.
[187]陈钦兰.供应链中企业合作协同的战略因素研究.山西财经大学学报,2007,29(3):83-88.
[188] Cyert R.M, Goodman P.S. Creating effective university-industry alliances: anorganization learning perspective. Organizational dynamics,1997,25(4):45-57.
[189]易余胤.高校科研团队成员合作博弈研究.暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,31(6):138-141
[190]戴芳,贾进.不同规模林农合作意愿差异的博弈分析——以对河北省的实地调研数据为基础.林业经济问题,2012,32(6):488-492
[191]文岳东.企业技术创新的新趋势——合作创新.企业技术开发,2003,(8):50-53
[192] Sveiby K. E, Simons R. Collaborative Climate and Effectiveness of KnowledgeWork——An Empirical Study.Journal of Knowledge Management,2002,6(5):420-433
[193] Goh S.G. Managing Effective Knowledge Transfer: An Integrative Frameworkand Some Practice Implications.Journal of Knowledge Management,2002,6(1):22-30.
[194]刘惠琴,张德.高校学科团队中魅力型领导对团队创新绩效影响的实证研究.科研管理,2007,28(4):185-191
[195] Rigdon E.E. A necessary and sufficient indentific rule for structual modelsestimated in practice.Multivariate Behavioral Research,1995,30(3):359-383.
[2] Alfred Weber.李刚剑,陈志人,张英保译.工业区位论.商务印书馆,2010
[3] Graham R. Marshall. Economics for Collaborative Environmental Management:Renegotiating the Commons. Earthscan,2005
[4] Hoover,E.M. An introduction to regional economics. New York:Knopf,1971
[5] F. Perroux. Economic space: theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics,1950,64(1):89-104
[6] F Moulaert, F Djellal. Information technology consultancy firms: economies ofagglomeration from a wide-area perspective.Urban Studies,1995,32(1):105-122
[7] A Malmberg, P Maskell. Towards an explanation of regional specialization andindustry agglomeration. European planning studies,1997,5(1):25-41
[8] Michael E. Porter. Location, competition, and economic development: Localclusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1):15-34
[9]徐占忱,何明升.接近性、互动网络与区域企业集群创新.科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(6):87-91
[10] Victor Gilsing, Bart Nooteboom. Density and strength of ties in innovationnetworks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European managementreview,2005,2:179-197
[11] Cooke, Philip. Regional innovation systems: origin of the species. InternationalJournal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development,2008,1(3):393-409
[12]李青,李文军,郭金龙.区域创新视角下的产业发展.商务印书馆,2004
[13] Michael Polanyi. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.Routledge,1962
[14] Lundvall B-A., Johnson B. The learning economy, Journal of Industry Studies.1994,1:23-42
[15]祝洵.区域品牌的形成——一个基于政府与市场关系理论的研究.浙江大学硕士学位论文.2006
[16] Brian Maskell. The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: AnInternational Journal,2001,6(1):5-11
[17]胡恩华,单红梅,刘光平,毛绚澜.企业集群创新行为影响因素的实证研究.研究与发展管理,2009,21(2):88-93
[18] Paul Tracey, Gordon L. Clark. Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy:Rethinking Cluster of Innovation. Growth and Change,2003,34(1):1-16
[19] Persaud, A. Enhancing synergistic innovative capability in multinationalcorporations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product InnovationManagement,2005,22:412-429.
[20] Rafael Besen, Frank Siqueira. A Mechanism for Semantic Web ServicesDiscovery in Mobile Environments.The Tenth International Conference onNetworks,2011
[21] Bengt-Ake Lundvall， Bj rn Johnson, Esben Sloth Andersen, Bent Dalum.National systems of production, innovation and competence building. ResearchPolicy,2002,31(2):213–231
[22] Castells M, Hall P. Technopoles of the world: The making oftwenty-first-century industrial complexes. Routledge,2009
[23] Daly H E, Farley J. Ecological economics: principles and applications. IslandPress,2010
[24] Books, LLC. Industrial Ecology: Environmental Economics, Biomimicry, Iso14000, Ecological Economics, Rebound Effect, Efficient Energy Use.GeneralBooks,2011
[25] K Fukuda,C Watanabe. Japanese and US perspectives on the national innovationecosystem.Technology in Society.2008,30(1):49–63
[26]韩福荣.质量生态学研究.世界标准化与质量管理.2005,(3):4-6
[27]陈先红.“关系生态说”的提出及其对公关理论的创新.2004,(3):86-88
[28] Johnson N, Lux T. Financial systems: Ecology and economics. Nature,2011,469(7330):302-303
[29] Ng, J.W.P.,Azarmi, N., Leida, M., Saffre, F., Afzal, A.,Yoo, P.D.. TheIntelligent Campus (iCampus): End-to-end learning lifecycle of a knowledgeecosystem.Intelligent Environments (IE),2010Sixth International Conference on.IEEE,2010:332-337
[30]孙振领,李后卿.关于知识生态系统的理论研究.图书与情报,2008,(5):22-27
[31] Moore’s J F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age ofBusiness Ecosystems.Wiley,1996
[32]杜国柱,舒华英.企业商业生态系统理论研究现状及展望.经济与管理研究,2007,(7):75-79
[33]钟耕深,崔祯珍.商业生态系统理论及其发展方向.东岳论丛,2009,30(6):27-33
[34] Song C, Guo S. Research on the Construction and Method System of EnterpriseInformation Ecosystem. Mechanical Engineering and Technology,2012:671-677
[35]王云梅.信息生态系统及其有效机制的构建.图书馆工作与研究,2010,(2):25-28
[36]单汨源,李果,陈丹等.基于生态位理论的企业竞争战略研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(3):159-163
[37]李勇,郑垂勇.企业生态位与竞争战略.当代财经,2007,(1):51-56
[38]薛海涛.基于企业生态位的企业竞争战略选择.天津大学硕士学位论文,2012
[39] Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Gupta A, et al. Understanding patterns oftechnology evolution: An ecosystem perspective.39th Annual HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06),2006,8:189a-189a
[40] Ron Adner. Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem.Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107
[41]石新泓.创新生态系统: IBM Inside.商业评论,2006,(8):60-65
[42]刘友金,罗发友.企业技术创新集群行为的行为生态学研究——一个分析框架的提出与构思.中国软科学,2004,(1):68-72
[43]傅羿芳,朱斌.高科技产业集群持续创新生态体系研究.科学学研究,2004,22(z1):128-135
[44]王晓凤,赵红,周庞等.我国高新技术产业发展的生态学思考.数量经济技术经济研究,2001,18(7):26-29
[45]黄鲁成.区域技术创新生态系统的特征.中国科技论坛,2003,(1):23-26.
[46] Wiig H, Wood M. What comprise a Regional Innovation System? An EmpiricalStudy,1999.
[47] Cooke P, Gomez Uranga M, Etxebarria G. Regional innovation systems:Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy,1997,26(4):475-491.
[48]胡志坚,苏靖.关于区域创新系统研究.科技日报,1999-10-16
[49]付晓东,林勇,张敦富,胡铁成,孙久文.知识经济与区域经济.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000.
[50]陈晓红,解海涛.基于"四主体动态模型"的中小企业协同创新体系研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(8):37-43.
[51]杨龙,戴扬.地方政府合作在区域合作中的作用.西北师大学报(社会科学版),2009,46(5):57-63
[52] Thorgren S, Wincent J, rtqvist D. Designing interorganizational networks forinnovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation andgovernance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2009,26(3):148-166
[53] Cooke P, Leydesdorff L. Regional development in the knowledge-basedeconomy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2006,31(1):5-15
[54] Meijers E. Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network ofcities more than the sum of the parts?. Urban studies,2005,42(4):765-781
[55] Pierre Barbaroux. Identifying collaborative innovation capabilities withinknowledge-intensive environments: Insights from the ARPANET project.European Journal of Innovation Management,2012,15(2):232-258
[56]王海建.基于协同创新思想的大学生协同创新能力培养.中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2012,28(3):105-108
[57]孟宪文,丁晋中,李惠等.企业技术创新能力与区域技术创新能力的协同性评价.生产力研究,2009,(8):143-145
[58]邢建军,李洋.区域创新网络要素间协同能力的测度——基于知识资本扩张路径.标准科学,2010,(4):78-82
[59]王大伟.区域自主创新活动中协同创新能力评价研究.安徽:合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2011
[60] Geringer J M. Selection of Partners for International Joint Venture.BusinessQuarterly,1988,53(1):55-62
[61] Lewis J D. Making strategic alliances work. Research-Technology Management,1990,33(6):12-15.
[62]福克纳, C.鲍曼.竞争战略.北京:中信出版社,1997
[63] Cauley de la Sierra M. Managing global alliances: Key steps for successfulcollaboration(The Economist Intelligence Unit). Addison-Wesley PublishingCompany, Wokingham England,1995
[64] Brouthers K D, Brouthers L E, Wilkinson T J. Strategic alliances: choose yourpartners. Long range planning,1995,28(3):2-25
[65] Büchel B. Managing partner relations in joint ventures. MIT Sloan ManagementReview,2003,44(4):91-95
[66]杨建君,梅晓芳,陈曼等.合作创新的伙伴选择:一个综合评价体系.科技管理研究,2009,29(1):6-9
[67]冯振环,罗永泰.虚拟型学习团队合作伙伴选择的结构化系统解决方案.科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(2):126-129
[68]桂黄宝,赵付民.基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)的合作技术创新伙伴选择研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(9):50-54
[69]刘朝,龙舟.基于技术标准的绿色农产品联盟伙伴选择研究.科技管理研究,2008,(6):467-470
[70]梁家强,韩学功.基于证据理论的战略联盟合作伙伴选择研究.华东经济管理,2010,24(12):97-100
[71]刘宝剑,吴春旭.基于蚁群算法的虚拟企业合作伙伴选择.计算机应用与软件,2008,25(1):127-128
[72]薛伟贤,张娟.高技术企业技术联盟互惠共生的合作伙伴选择研究.研究与发展管理,2010,22(1):82-89
[73]楼高翔,万宁.基于供应链的技术创新协同伙伴选择与评价.科技进步与对策,2011,28(24):153-155
[74]游静,刘伟.基于平衡计分卡和广义熵算法的IT合作伙伴选择方法.科技管理研究,2007,27(7):218-220
[75]王雄,岳意定.基于混合目标模糊优选动态规划的动态物流联盟伙伴选择模型.软科学,2008,22(2):18-21
[76]戴彬,屈锡华,李宏伟等.基于模糊综合评价的技术创新合作伙伴选择模型研究.科技进步与对策,2011,28(1):120-123
[77]罗剑锋.基于动态模糊评价的通信运营商合作伙伴选择模型及实证研究.财经理论与实践,2012,33(4):91-95
[78] Simatupang T M, Sridharan R. The collaboration index: a measure for supplychain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution&LogisticsManagement,2005,35(1):44-62
[79] Fan Decheng, Tang Xiaoxu. Performance evaluation of industry-university-research cooperative technological innovation based on fuzzy integral.International Conference on Management Science&Engineering,2009:1789-1795
[80]张爱琴,陈红.产学研知识创新网络的协同创新评价研究.中北大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(4):44-47
[81]李刚.供应链协同创新的绩效测评及其应用研究.中国科技资源导刊,2011,43(2):59-67
[82]路正南,刘春奇,王国栋.光伏产业链协同绩效评价指标体系研究.科技与经济,2013,26(1):106-110
[83] Bonaccorsi A, Piccaluga A. A theoretical framework for the evaluation ofuniversity‐industry relationships. R&D Management,1994,24(3):229-247
[84]张翠华,周红,赵淼等.供应链协同绩效评价及其应用.东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(6):706-708
[85]柯飞帆,宁宣熙.基于神经网络的合作企业资源协同评价的研究.中国制造业信息化,2006,35(1):17-20
[86]顾兢晶.供应链协同管理中知识共享机制的研究.合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2007
[87]季宇. U/I知识联盟协同创新绩效的数理分析模型.大连交通大学学报,2007,28(2):84-87
[88] Bhagwat R, Sharma M K. Performance measurement of supply chainmanagement using the analytical hierarchy process. Production Planning andControl,2007,18(8):666-680
[89] Philbin S. Process model for university-industry research collaboration.European Journal of Innovation Management,2008,11(4):488-521
[90]晏斌.供应链协同综合绩效评价研究.江苏大学硕士学位论文,2008
[91]王庆金,王阳,周雪等.科技中介与区域创新主体协同发展研究评析.价值工程,2010,29(28):9-10
[92]王玉梅.复合DEA方法的知识创新联盟系统协同发展评价.中国科技论坛,2010,(8):26-31
[93]赵川,杨洁,曾强等.遗传算法改进的BP神经网络在协同创新评价中的应用.机械,2010,37(8):5-9
[94]乔金杰,赵秋莲.农业技术创新主体协同绩效分析及主体确立.安徽农业科学,2011,39(18):11225-11227
[95]冯博,索玮岚,樊治平等.考虑多指标模糊关联的服务制造网络协同绩效评价方法.中国管理科学,2012,20(4):95-103
[96]徐潇.基于云模型的海尔白色家电供应链绩效评价研究.中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2012
[97]杜栋,胡慧玲.产学研协同创新的绩效评价研究.中国科技资源导刊,2013,(1):73-76
[98]孔祥浩,丁萌,周聚等.基于压缩感知的协同创新评价方法研究.价值工程,2013,(5):1-3.
[99]孟庆松,韩文秀.复合系统协调度模型研究.天津大学学报,2000,33(4):444-446.
[100] Ensign P C. The concept of fit in organizational research. International JournalOrganization Theory and Behavior,2001,4(3-4):287-306
[101]徐浩鸣,徐建中,康姝丽等.中国国有医药制造产业组织系统协同度模型及实证分析.中国科技论坛,2003,(1):113-117
[102]陈丹宇.长三角区域创新系统中的协同效应研究.浙江大学博士学位论文.2010
[103] Eva M． Mora-Valentin,Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, Luis A. Guerras-Martin.Determing factors in the success of R&D organizations.Research Policy,2004,33:17-40
[104] Plewa C, Quester P. Key drivers of university-industry relationships: the role oforganisational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of ServicesMarketing,2007,21(5):370-382.
[105] Butler James R A,Hill Rosemary, Wallace marilyn. Cooperative research:anexample from the wet tropics of queenland. International Journal ofInterdisciplinary Social Sciences,2010,6(5):139-154.
[106]武海峰,牛勇平.山东省产学研合作绩效影响因素的实证分析.东岳论丛,2011,23(12):163-166
[107]吴悦,顾新.产学研协同创新的知识协同过程研究.中国科技论坛，2012,(10):17-23.
[108]肖丁丁,朱桂龙.产学研合作创新效率及其影响因素的实证研究.科研管理，2013,34(1):11-18.
[109]张海滨.高校产学研协同创新的影响因素及机制构建.福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,27(3):104-107.
[110]姚艳虹,杜梦华.科技协同创新演进规律及其影响因素分析.湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2013,27(3):37-41.
[111] Lawrence P., Lorsch, J. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developingand testing multiple contingency models.Management Science,2006,42(5):693-712
[112] Collins C.J, Smith K.G. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role ofhuman resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms.Academy of management journal,2006,49(3):544-560.
[113]水常青,郑刚,许庆瑞.影响中国大中型工业企业协同创新要素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(12):44-48.
[114]杨丽伟.供应链企业协同自主创新研究.武汉理工大学博士学位论文,2008
[115]杜宝苍,李朝明.高新技术企业协同知识创新绩效影响因素实证研究.科技管理研究,2013,33(12):172-176.
[116]刘红胜,王延娜,颜永才等.基于ISM的制造企业供应链协同绩效关键影响因素分析.当代经济,2011,(11):154-155
[117] Cooke P, Morgan K. Learning Through Networking: regional innovation and thelessons of Baden-Württemberg. Cardiff: Regional Industrial Research,1990.
[118] Metcalfe J S. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionaryframework. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1995,19(1):25-46
[119] Braczyk, Hans-Joachim, Philip Cooke, and Martin Heidenreich. Regionalinnovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Routledge,1998.
[120] Cook P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G. Regional Systems of Innovation:AnEvolutionary Perspective. Environment and Planning A,1998,30:1563-1584
[121]陈光,王永杰.区域技术创新系统研究论纲——兼论中国西部地区的技术创新.世界科技研究与发展,1999,21(1):70-74
[122]盖文启.创新网络——区域经济发展新思维.北京:北京大学出版社,2002
[123]赵修卫.建设区域创新系统促进区域经济发展.科技管理研究,2000(4):23-25
[124]胡志坚,苏靖.区域创新系统理论的提出与发展.中国科技论坛,1999,(6):20-23
[125] Doloreux D. What we should know about regional systems of innovation.Technology in society,2002,24(3):243-263
[126] Cooke P, Boekholt P, T dtling F. Regional Innovation Systems: designing forthe future. Final Report to DG12of the REGIS TSER project, Centre forAdvanced Studies in the Social Sciences, University of Wales, Cardiff.,1998.
[127] Archibugi, Daniele, Jeremy Howells, and Jonathan Michie. Innovation policy ina global economy[M]. Cambridge University Press,1999.
[128] Braczyk, Hans-Joachim, Philip Cooke, and Martin Heidenreich.Regionalinnovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Routledge,1998
[129] Asheim B T, Isaksen A. Regional innovation systems: the integration of local‘sticky’and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):77-86
[130] Isaksen A. Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrialdevelopment possible in the global economy?. Canadian Journal of RegionalScience,2001,24(1):101-120
[131] Autio E. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. EuropeanPlanning Studies,1998,6(2):131-140
[132] T dtling F, Trippl M. One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regionalinnovation policy approach. Research policy,2005,34(8):1203-1219
[133] Padmore T, Gibson H. Modelling systems of innovation II:A framework forindustrial cluster analysis in regions. Research policy,1998,26(6):625-641
[134] Radosevic S. Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe:determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):87-96
[135] Guth M. Innovation, social inclusion and coherent regional development: a newdiamond for a socially inclusive innovation policy in regions. EuropeanPlanning Studies,2005,13(2):333-349
[136]王稼琼,绳丽惠，陈鹏飞.区域创新体系的功能与特征分析.中国软科学,1999(2):53-55,63
[137]官建成,刘顺忠.区域创新系统测度的研究框架和内容.中国科技论坛,2003,(2):24-26
[138]陈琪,徐东.区域创新体系的系统结构研究.科技进步与对策,2007,24(8):45-47
[139] Folan P, Browne J. A review of performance measurement: Towardsperformance management. Computers in Industry,2005,56(7):663-680
[140] Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K. Performance measurement system design: aliterature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations&Production Management,2005,25(12):1228-1263
[141] Beamon B M. Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods.International journal of production economics,1998,55(3):281-294
[142] Brewer P C, Speh T W. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chainperformance. Journal of Business logistics,2000,21(1):75-94
[143] Avkiran N K, Rowlands T. How to better identify the true managerialperformance: State of the art using DEA. Omega,2008,36(2):317-324
[144]胡季英,冯英浚.企业绩效评价理论研究述评与展望.现代管理科学,2005,(9):29-31
[145]徐倩.绩效评价.北京:中国标准出版社,2008
[146]颜艳梅.公共工程项目绩效评价.湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006
[147]罗伯特·卡普兰,大卫·诺顿.平衡记分卡.广东经济出版社,2004
[148] Ansoff H I. Corporate strategy. NY: McGraw-Hill,1965.
[149]彭纪生,吴林海.论技术协同创新模式及建构.研究与发展管理,2000,12(5):12-16
[150]郑刚,梁欣如.全面协同:创新致胜之道——技术与非技术要素全面协同机制研究.科学学研究,2006,24(z1):268-273
[151]陈劲,谢芳,贾丽娜等.企业集团内部协同创新机理研究.管理学报,2006,3(6):733-740
[152]徐力行,毕淑青.关于产业创新协同战略框架的构想.山西财经大学学报,2007,29(4):51-55
[153]顾菁,薛伟贤.高技术产业协同创新研究.科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):84-89.
[154]杨洁.低碳经济背景下区域产业协同创新体系研究——以长株潭为例.广西社会科学,2013,(7):82-84
[155]陈文俊.长株潭区域协同创新体系建设研究.湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,8(3):82-87
[156]肖德云,李伟保,王恕立等.国家创新体系协同学习的一个分析框架.管理科学,2009,22(6):29-37
[157] PA Gloor. Swarm Creativity:Competitive Advantage through CollaborativeInnovation Networks. New York: Oxford University Press,2006.
[158]杨耀武,张仁开.长三角产业集群协同创新战略研究.第七届中国软科学年会论文集.2009:136-139,144.
[159]刘桂花,宋承祥,刘弘等.云发生器的软件实现.计算机应用研究,2007,24(1):46-48.
[160]熊立,梁樑,王国华等.层次分析法中数字标度的选择与评价方法研究.系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):72-79
[161]孙才志,林学钰.基于层次分析的模糊一致性判断矩阵及其应用.模糊系统与数学,2002,16(3):59-63
[162] Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York: Mc Gtaw Hill,1980
[163] Alavia.M., Tiwana.A. Knowledge Integration in Virtual team: the Potential Roleof KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science andTechnology.2002,53(12):1029-1037
[164] Sivadas E, Dwyer F. R. An examination of organizational factors influencingnew product success in internal and alliance-based processes.The Journal ofMarketing,2000,64(1):31-49.
[165]游振华.种子产业链企业合作绩效影响因素实证研究.华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[166]徐志云.知识合作创新的方式和影响因素与绩效关系经验研究.河北工业大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[167]于冬.企业合作创新绩效影响因素分析.大连理工大学博士学位论文,2008
[168]张媛媛,张宗益.创新环境、创新能力与创新绩效的系统性研究——基于面板数据的经验分析.科技管理研究.2009,29(12):91-93
[169]曲怡颖,甄杰,任浩.创新集群内企业声誉对创新能力及创新绩效的作用.软科学,2012,26(1):11-15.
[170] David J Teece. Capturing Value from knowledge Assets: The New Economy,Markets for Know-how and Intangible Assets. California Management Review.1998(40):55-79.
[171] Grayr J. Organization Climate and Project Success. International Journal ofProject Management,2001,(19):103-109.
[172]朱少英,齐二石,徐渝.变革性领导、团队氛围、知识共享与团队创新绩效的关系.软科学,2008,22(11):1-4.
[173] Balachandra,R.and Friair, J.H.Factors for success in R&D projects and newproduct innovation: a contextual framework. Engineering Management, IEEETransactions on,1997,44(3):276-287.
[174] Jeffrey,K.P. And Dennis,P.S. Critical factors in successful projectimplementation．IEEE Transactions on engineering management,1987:8-22
[175]张大伟.工作价值观视角下服务行业组织创新气氛与创新绩效的关系研究.山东大学硕士学位论文.2011
[176] Beckett-Canmmta,E. J., Carnarata,M．R．And Barker, R. T．Integrating internaland external customer relationships through relationship management： astrategic response to a changing global environment． Journal of BusinessResearch,1998(41):71-81
[177] Rothwell,R. Successful industrial innovation：Critical factors for the1990s．R&D Management,1992,22(3):221-239
[178] Michael D.Santoro.Success breeds success: the linkage between relationshipintensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures.The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2000,(11):255-273.
[179]刘衡,李垣,李西垚.关系资本、组织间沟通和创新绩效的关系研究.科学学研究,2010,28(12):1912-1919.
[180]汪秀婷,杜海波,江澄.技术创新网络中核心企业对创新绩效影响：沟通和信任的中介作用研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(12):37-44
[181]安新颖,冷伏海.基于结构方程模型的企业自主创新能力研究.科技进步与对策,2008,25(4):63-66.
[182] Hansen M. T., Nohria N.and Tierney T.What’s your strategy for managingknowledge?. Harvard Business Review,1999,77(2):106-116.
[183]吴邦正,李芳.知识员工激励方式与组织创新绩效的实证研究——以中关村高科技企业为例.兰州学刊,2013,(6):105-114.
[184] Vaaland,T and Hakansson,H. Exploring interorganizational conflict in complexprojects. Industrial Marketing Management,2003(32):127-138
[185] Inkpen A C.A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: Competition,cooperation, and relative scope.Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(7):775-779.
[186] Narula R. R&D collaboration by SMEs:some analytical issues and evidence.Cooperative strategies and alliances,2002:543-568.
[187]陈钦兰.供应链中企业合作协同的战略因素研究.山西财经大学学报,2007,29(3):83-88.
[188] Cyert R.M, Goodman P.S. Creating effective university-industry alliances: anorganization learning perspective. Organizational dynamics,1997,25(4):45-57.
[189]易余胤.高校科研团队成员合作博弈研究.暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,31(6):138-141
[190]戴芳,贾进.不同规模林农合作意愿差异的博弈分析——以对河北省的实地调研数据为基础.林业经济问题,2012,32(6):488-492
[191]文岳东.企业技术创新的新趋势——合作创新.企业技术开发,2003,(8):50-53
[192] Sveiby K. E, Simons R. Collaborative Climate and Effectiveness of KnowledgeWork——An Empirical Study.Journal of Knowledge Management,2002,6(5):420-433
[193] Goh S.G. Managing Effective Knowledge Transfer: An Integrative Frameworkand Some Practice Implications.Journal of Knowledge Management,2002,6(1):22-30.
[194]刘惠琴,张德.高校学科团队中魅力型领导对团队创新绩效影响的实证研究.科研管理,2007,28(4):185-191
[195] Rigdon E.E. A necessary and sufficient indentific rule for structual modelsestimated in practice.Multivariate Behavioral Research,1995,30(3):359-383.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |