用户名: 密码: 验证码:
特殊情景下水功能区水质达标评价方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为解决我国日益复杂的水环境问题,实现水资源高效利用和水环境有效保护,2011年中央1号文件明确提出实施“最严格的水资源管理制度”,划定用水总量控制红线、用水效率控制红线和水功能区限制纳污红线“三条红线”。2012年《国务院关于实行最严格水资源管理制度的意见》中确定水功能区限制纳污红线以水功能区水质达标率作为考核指标,并提出2030年水功能区水质达标率提高到95%。由此水功能区水质达标评价准确性、合理性成为水功能区限制纳污制度实施的基础保障。现阶段,我国《地表水环境质量标准》(GB3838-2002)、《地表水资源质量评价技术规程》(SL395-2007)及《全国重要江河湖泊水功能区水质达标评价技术方案》(2012)等技术标准和规程中对水功能区水质达标评价作出了具体的规定,但受经济发展水平、技术水平及自然地理位置等因素的制约,我国水功能区水质达标评价实践中遇到了上游来水超标、监测频次少、左右岸省界缓冲区水质不达标等特殊情景条件下水功能区水质不达标情景分析以及水功能区水质评价方法缺失等现实困境,这给我国水功能区水质达标评价带来了阻力,亦成为我国最严格水资源管理制度的实施障碍。
     基于此,本文在相关理论的基础上,分析我国现行水功能区水质标价存在的问题,研究界定我国水功能区水质评价实践中存在的上游来水超标、监测频次少、左右岸省界缓冲区水质不达标等情景下水质评价困境,并对上游来水超标、监测频次少以及左右岸省界缓冲区水质达标评价方法进行研究,以有效填补相关技术方法的空白,同时为我国水功能区限制纳污红线制度的实施提供技术支撑。
     研究显示,(1)上游来水超标情景下目标水功能区水质评结果显失公平,根据物料平衡原理,构建小尺度通量核算模型,根据不同水功能区的类型计算排入水功能区的污染物通量,模拟上游来水水质变化,从目标断面实测污染物的通量中扣除超出部分的通量,建立水质模拟-通量扣除法和限制排污总量-污染物入河量评估法两种评价方法,经实例验证,方法切实可行,可以解决水功能区水质评价实践中存在的上游来水超标问题。(2)监测频次少情景下水功能区达标评价过程中存在资金、技术水平以及气候变化等问题导致的频次不足问题,导致评价结果不准确或无法评价,综合考虑数据获取困境、水功能区区位、资金技术水平等因素,建立“定性评估——邻功能区评估法”与“定量核算——同水期数据法、邻近断面推导法、限制排污总量-污染物入河总量评估法”相结合的水质评价方法,以解决当前水功能区水质评价困境,实例验证显示,评价结果均与实际情况一致,方法切实可行。(3)左右岸省界缓冲区水质不达标情景下,现有水功能区水质达标评价主要通过考核断面的水质监测数据进行评价,无法核算左岸、右岸省份污染贡献率,因各省相邻关系而导致各省水质达标情况无法判断,分析省界缓冲区各省位置关系以及各省污染物排放特征,研究建立各省调整浓度核算法、代表断面判断法以及限制排污总量-污染物入河量评估法对各省在该水功能区水质达标情况进行评价,实例验证结果显示,方法可行。
     综上所述,上游来水超标问题、左右岸省界缓冲区水质达标评价问题以及客观因素导致监测频次不足问题是现有技术方法的盲区,需要研究确定相关评价方法,将此类特殊情景的评价模式方法入相关技术标准中,从而解决上游来水超标、监测频次少、左右岸省界缓冲区水质评价的现实困境。
In order to solve the increasingly complex problem of the water environment andachieve highly efficient utilization of water resources and effective protection of thewater environment in our country, in2011, the Central Document No.1proposed toimplement The strictest management system of water resources and delimit “three redlines”, including one for total water supply control, the second one for waterutilization efficiency control and the third one for limiting pollutant capacity in waterfunction zones. In2012, The views of the State Council on implementing the moststringent management system of water resources ascertained that water qualificationrates would be taken as the assessment indicators for the determination of red line forlimiting pollutant capacity in water function zones and proposed that water qualitycompliance rates of water function zones should be raised to95%in2030. Therefore,the veracity and rationality of water function zones’ water quality assessment becomethe foundations of the implementation of the limiting pollutant capacity system.
     At present, Technical specifications of surface water quality assessment(SL395-2007) and Water quality assessment technical plan of the national importantrivers and lakes water function zones (2012) have regulated the water qualityassessment of the water function zone explicitly. However, restricted by factors suchas economic development, technology, natural geographical location and so on, thewater assessment practices have been facing difficulties: the exceeding of upstreamrunoff, the lacking of monitoring frequency, the substandard scenario analysis onwater quality in water function zones under the situation of the left and right banks'provincial boundary buffer, and the deficiency of water quality evaluation method ofwater function zones. These difficulties are considered to be a challenge for the waterquality compliance evaluation of water function zones and have become thebottleneck for implementing the most stringent management system of waterresources in China.
     This paper analyze problems of our country’s the current water pricing system inwater functional regions and the substandard circumstances, such as the exceeding ofupstream runoff, insufficient monitoring frequency, the left and right banks' provincialboundary buffer and so on. This paper studied the evaluation methodologies for theexceeding of upstream runoff, the lacking of monitoring frequency and thedetermination of water quality standard of the left and right banks' provincialboundary buffer, effectively fill up the blank of the technical specification of surfacewater quality assessment (SL395-2007) for water functional regions’ water qualityevaluation under special conditions, and provide technical support for theimplementation of the red-line of pollution limiting capacity system of water functionzones in China.
     Studies have shown that:(1) the water quality assessment results of downstreamwater function zones under a condition that water quality of upstream water isexceeding the standard are not justified. Whereas the assessment procedures of theexisting surface water resources quality do not incorporate specific disposal methodsto cope with the condition. According to relevant terms in Explanations of theassessment indicators for the implementation of water pollution preventionspecialized planning in key river basins, by deducting the exceeded flux from theactual measured pollutant flux of the objective fracture surface (??), this paperproposed two evaluation methods: establishing water quality simulation-fluxdeduction method and restricting total pollution emission-pollutant discharged in river.These two methods have been proved to be feasible in several examples.(2) Theinaccurate water quality assessment caused by the insufficient frequency due touncertaintiesand inadequate technology under insufficient monitoring scenario, asshown in this paper, can be evaluated through the identical water season dataalternative method, adjacent fracture surface derivation method, adjacent functionzones evaluating method and evaluation method of limiting total pollution emission-total pollutant discharged in river. The example verifications indicate that theevaluation results consistently match the practical situations, suggesting thesemethods are feasible.(3) The situation under which the water quality of the left and right provincial boundary buffering zones cannot be estimated because of the adjacentrelations of provinces could be accessed through provinces’ adjusting concentrationaccounting method, representative fracture surface judging method and evaluationmethod of limiting total pollution emission-total pollutant discharged in river toevaluate the reaching standard situation of water quality in water functional area. Theexample verification results display that these methods are practical.
     To summerize, the exceeding of upstream runoff, insufficient monitoringfrequency, the left and right banks' provincial boundary buffer are the blind spots ofthe existing technical method. We should make the relevant evaluation methods andtechnical standards, so as to solve the difficulties of the exceeding of upstream runoff,insufficient monitoring frequency, the left and right banks' provincial boundary buffer.
引文
[1]钱正英,张兴斗.中国可持续发展水资源战略研究综合报告——中国工程院“21世纪中国可持续发展水资源战略研究”项目组[J].中国工程科学,2000,2(8):1-17.
    [2]李志群.实施流域水功能区限制纳污制度基本框架[J].东北水利水电,2012(1):1-5.
    [3]郑丙辉,朱建平,刘琰,等.我国地表水环境功能区达标评价方法[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(8):105-108.
    [4]殷世芳.水功能区达标率评价及影响因素分析[J].人民黄河,2012,34(5):38-39.
    [5]涂敏.基于水功能区水质达标率的河流健康评价方法[J].人民长江,2008,39(23):130-133.
    [6]矫勇,陈明忠,石波,等.英国法国水资源管理制度的考察[J].中国水利,2001(3):43-45.
    [7]黄茁,赵鑫,赵伟华,等.长江中下游干流水功能区水质评价体系研究[J].人民长江,.2013.44(10):40-43(51)。
    [8]黄海斌.中国水资源利用与经济社会可持续发展研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2007.
    [9]金浩波.荷兰水环境保护面面观.黄河报[N],2005-9-17.
    [10]姜涛.对划定水功能区限制纳污控制线的几点认识[J].治淮,2010(7):12-13.
    [11]刘晨.关于水功能区管理的若干思考[J].中国水利,2004(4):19-20.
    [12]郁丹英,贾利.落实水功能区限制纳污制度的分析与思索[J].治淮,2012(10):29-31.
    [13]李志群.实施流域水功能区限制纳污制度细部工作[J].东北水利水电,2012(10):29-32.
    [14]夏青,陈艳卿,刘宪兵.水质基准与水质标准[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
    [15]毛兴华.常用水质评价方法的选择[J].水科学与工程技术,2006(1):21-23.
    [16]邹志红,孙靖南,任广平.模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(4):552-556.
    [17]陈书琴,许秋瑾,颜昌宙,等.主成分分析赋权及其在水质评价灰色模型中的应用[J].昆明理工大学学报:理工版,2008,33(2):77-80.
    [18]王永杰,张丽英.区域水功能区监测与管理技术初探[J].水资源研究,2012,33(3):28-30.
    [19]许科文,吕怀炼,沈初,等.水功能区监测评价的实践与探索[J].中国原水论坛专辑,2010:229-232.
    [20]徐祖信.我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(3):321-325.
    [21]贾晓蕾,卢刚.水资源管理的常见问题及策略探究[J].陕西水利,2013(E01):57-58.
    [22]杨桂莲,章树安,张留柱,等.对全国省界断面水资源监测站网规划主要成果的认识与建议[J].水文,2013(2):29-34.
    [23]肖中新.安徽省辖淮河流域省控地表水环境监测点位优化研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2008.
    [24]吕兰军.界河水文监测浅析[J].水利发展研究,2013,12(12):53-56.
    [25]于会泉.模糊综合评价法在余姚江水质评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2013(1):171-173.
    [26]周怀东,彭文启,杜霞,等.中国地表水水质评价[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2004,2(4):255-264.
    [27]俞新华.影响杭州市水环境功能区达标的主要因素分析[J].环境污染与防治,2000,22(5):41-42.
    [28]胡必彬,陈蕊,刘新会,等.欧盟水环境标准体系研究[J].环境污染与防治,2005,26(6):468-471.
    [29]胡必彬.欧盟水环境标准体系[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(1):45-48.
    [30] Bulkley J W. Integrated watershed management: Past, present, and future[J].Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education,2011,100(1):3.
    [31] Hoornbeek J, Hansen E, Ringquist E, et al. Implementing Water Pollution Policyin the United States: Total Maximum Daily Loads and Collaborative WatershedManagement[J]. Society&Natural Resources,2013,26(4):420-436.
    [32]肖文燕.20世纪国外流域管理经验及对鄱阳湖流域管理的启示[J].江西财经大学学报,2010,(6):83-88.
    [33]王晓亮.中外流域管理比较研究[J].环境科学导刊,2011,30(1):15-19.
    [34]彭文启,张祥伟等编著.现代水环境质量评价理论与方法[M].化学工业出版社,2005.
    [35] Fritsch O, Benson D. Integrating the Principles of Integrated Water ResourcesManagement? River Basin Planning in England and Wales[J]. InternationalJournal of Water Governance,2013,1(3):265-284.
    [36] Brooks K N, Ffolliott P F, Magner J A. Hydrology and the Management ofWatersheds[M]. John Wiley&Sons,2012.
    [37] Ruiguang H, Huan M, Yuan Y. Experience and reference of water managementsystem in France [J]. China Water Resources,2012(11):018.
    [38]法国水资源优化配置与管理系统[R].水利发展研究,2002,2(3):35-38.
    [39] Krenkel P. Water quality management[M]. Elsevier,2012.
    [40]申献辰,邹晓雯,杜霞.中国地表水资源质量评价方法的研究[J].水利学报,2002(12):63-67.
    [41]尹海龙,徐祖信.我国单因子水质评价方法改进探讨[J].净水技术,2008,27(2):1-3.
    [42]尹海龙、徐祖信.河流综合水质评价方法比较研究[J].长江流域资源与环境.2008,17(5):729-733.
    [43]史栾生,幸成.广东省地表水水功能区水质达标评价[J].广东水利水电,2006(6):58-60(82).
    [44]左国超.一种新的水质评价方法—属性识别法[J].现代电子技术,2007(1):156-158.
    [45]刘成,涂敏,苏海.模糊数学评价法在长江流域重点水功能区水质评价中的应用[C].中国水利学会第三届青年科技论坛论文集,2007,221-227.
    [46] Assessment and watershed protection bureau, office of wetlands, oceans andwatersheds, office of water, US Environmental Protection Bureau. Guidelinesfor preparation of the comprehensive state water quality assessments (305(b)reports) and electronic updates: report contents[R].1997,9.
    [47]陆卫军、张涛.几种河流水质评价方法的比较分析[J].环境科学与管理.2009,34(6):174-176.
    [48]张旋、王启山、于淼、吴京.基于聚类分析和水质标识指数的水质评价方法[J].环境工程学报.2010,4(2):476-480.
    [49]杨迪虎.关于河流水功能区水质评价方法的思考[J].水利技术监督,2011(5):17-20(33).
    [50]王永杰,张丽英.聊城市水功能区水质评价研究[J].地下水,2012,34(5):106-108.
    [51] Simeonov, V., Stratis, J.A., Samara C., Zachariadis, G., Voutsa, D., Anthemidis,A., Sofoniou, M. and Kouimtzis, T. Assessment of the Surface Water Quality inNorthern Greece. Water Res.,2003,37(17),4119–4124.
    [52] Kotti ME, Vlessidis AG, Thanasoulias NC et alAssessment of river water qualityin northwestern Greece. Water Resour Manag2005(19):77–94.
    [53] Singh, K.P., Malik, A. and Sinha, S. Water Quality Assessment andApportionment of Pollution Sources of Gomti River (India) Using MultivariateStatistical Techniques: A Case Study. Anal. Chim. Acta,2005,538(1–2),355–374.
    [54] Ouyang, Y., Nkedi-Kizza, P., Wu, Q. T., Shinde, D.,&Huang, C. H..Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. Water Research,2006(40):3800–3810.
    [55] Shrestha S, Kazama F Assessment of surface water quality using multivariatestatistical techniques; a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ ModelSoftw2007,22(4):464–475
    [56] Zhou, F., Liu, Y.,&Guo, H.. Application of multivariate statistical methods towater quality assessment of the watercourses in Northwestern New Territories,Hong Kong. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2007(132):1–13.
    [57] Filik Iscen, C., Emiroglu, O., Ilhan, S., Arslan, N., Yilmaz, V.,&Ahiska, S.Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of surfacewater quality in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring andAssessment,2008(144):269–276.
    [58] Voyslavov T, Tsakovski S, Simeonov V. Hasse diagram technique as a tool forwater quality assessment[J]. Analytica chimica acta,2011(770):29-35.
    [59] Solaun O, Rodríguez J G, Borja A, et al. Background metal levels determinationin bivalves–quality assessment of the European Water Framework Directive[J].Chemistry and Ecology,2013,29(1):11-27.
    [60] Hao R X, Li S M, Li J B, et al. Water Quality Assessment for WastewaterReclamation Using Principal Component Analysis[J]. Journal of EnvironmentalInformatics,2013,21(1).
    [61]邱凉,罗小勇,李斐,等.水功能区考核指标体系研究初探[J].能源环境保护,2012,26(4):55-58.
    [62]陈诚坤.关于水质监测频次的研究[J].中国环境监测,1990,6(5):50-54.
    [63]陈镇华.应该对潮汐河流水质监测问题进行研究[J].中国环境监测,1989(1):025.
    [64]杜大仲.河流型饮用水水源地安全保障体系构建及实证研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2011.
    [65]孙景云,楼玉蓉,陈佩璇,等.全国地表水环境监测优化布点方案的研究[J].中国环境监测,1987,3(5):1-4.
    [66]李雅忠,郝晓杰.山西省汾河流域地表水环境监测断面优化设置[J].中北大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(6):732-737.
    [67]周慰祖.水质监测取样方法的探讨[J].水文,1984(1):50-54.
    [68]李香华,陈文权.南京市水功能区划分及水质达标分析[J].江苏水利,2008(9):38-39.
    [69]李生荣.我国水资源的现状与对策—水资源短缺制约着我国经济社会的发展[J].延安职业技术学院学报,2009(6):101-103.
    [70]张洪季友玉李合海。区域水功能区限制纳污指标与水质达标率确定初探[J].地下水,2012-05,34(3):97-98.
    [71] Li H, Sun H, Hao J. Studies on the water environmental capacity of Qinhuai riverin Nanjing[J]. Bridges,2014,10:9780784412435.105.
    [72]付意成,徐文新,付敏.我国水环境容量现状研究[J].中国水利,2010,1(1):26-31.
    [73]张永良.水环境容量基本概念的发展[J].环境科学研究,1992,5(3):59-61.
    [74]于雷,吴舜泽,徐毅.我国水环境容量研究应用回顾及展望[J].环境保护,2007(03B):46-48.
    [75]熊风,罗洁.河流水环境容量计算模型分析[J].中国测试技术,2005,31(1):116-117.
    [76]刘兰芬,张祥伟,夏军.河流水环境容量预测方法研究[J].水利学报,1998,7(7):16-20.
    [77]何京丽,珊丹,刘艳萍.草原生态环境容量研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2010(003):31-33.
    [78]吴丹,李薇,肖锐敏.水环境容量与总量控制在制定排放标准中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2005,28(2):48-50.
    [79] Feng L H, Huang C F. A risk assessment model of water shortage based oninformation diffusion technology and its application in analyzing carryingcapacity of water resources[J]. Water resources management,2008,22(5):621-633.
    [80] Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al. Economic growth, carrying capacity, andthe environment[J]. Ecological economics,1995,15(2):91-95.
    [81]郭秀锐,毛显强,冉圣宏.国内环境承载力研究进展[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2000,10(3):28-30.
    [82]曾维华,王华东,薛纪渝.人口,资源与环境协调发展关键问题之一环境承载力研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,1991,1(2):33-37.
    [83]中国百科大全书委员会.环境科学[M].北京:中国百科大全书出版社,2002.
    [84] Edwards R Y. The concept of carrying capacity[J]. Essential Readings inWildlife Management and Conservation,2013:279.
    [85] Berck P, Levy A, Chowdhury K. An analysis of the world's environment andpopulation dynamics with varying carrying capacity, concerns and skepticism[J].Ecological Economics,2012(73):103-112.
    [86]郭秀锐,毛显强,冉圣宏.国内环境承载力研究进展[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2000,10(3):28-30.
    [87] Bai L P Y. Numerical study of regional environmental carrying capacity forlivestock and poultry farming based on planting-breeding balance[J].环境科学学报:英文版,2013(009):1882-1889.
    [88]余春祥.可持续发展的环境容量和资源承载力分析[J].中国软科学,2004(2):130-133.
    [89]王俭,孙铁珩,李培军,等.环境承载力研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(4):768-772..
    [90]张红.国内外资源环境承载力研究述评[J].理论学刊,2007(10):80-83.
    [91]朱海冰,蔡道成,张侨.中国可持续发展理论概述[J].商业时代,2011(007):6-7.
    [92] Quental N, Louren o J M, da Silva F N. Sustainable development policy: goals,targets and political cycles[J]. Sustainable Development,2011,19(1):15-29.
    [93]牛文元.可持续发展理论的基本认知[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(3):1-6.
    [94] Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, et al. Policy: Sustainable developmentgoals for people and planet[J]. Nature,2013,495(7441):305-307.
    [95] Elliott J. An introduction to sustainable development[M]. Routledge,2012.
    [96]罗慧,霍有光,胡彦华,等.可持续发展理论综述[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004.
    [97] Reid D. Sustainable development: an introductory guide[M]. Routledge,2013.
    [98]米文宝.宁夏西海固贫困少数民族地区可持续发展研究[M].西安:西安地图出版社,2001.
    [99]叶文虎,仝川.联合国可持续发展指标体系述评[J].中国人口.资源与环境,1997,7(3):83-87.
    [100] Hall J K, Daneke G A, Lenox M J. Sustainable development andentrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions[J]. Journal of BusinessVenturing,2010,25(5):439-448.
    [101] While A, Jonas A E G, Gibbs D. From sustainable development to carboncontrol: eco‐state restructuring and the politics of urban and regionaldevelopment[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,2010,35(1):76-93.
    [102] Kaygusuz K. Energy for sustainable development: A case of developingcountries[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2012,16(2):1116-1126.
    [103] Kasem S, Thapa G B. Sustainable development policies and achievements inthe context of the agriculture sector in Thailand[J]. Sustainable Development,2012,20(2):98-114.
    [104] White P J, Brown P H. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and globalhealth[J]. Annals of botany,2010,105(7):1073-1080.
    [105]牛文元.中国可持续发展总论(路甬祥总主编,中国可持续发展总纲,第一卷).北京:科学出版社,2007
    [106] ZHANG J L,WANG Y J,DING W Q,et al.Eco-environmental qualityevaluation of Manasi River Basin in recent30years[J].Meteorological andEnvironmental Research,2010,1(4):109-112.
    [107]胡成,苏丹.综合水质标识指数法在浑河水质评价中的应用[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(1):186-192.
    [108]周小同,杨莉,刘小清,罗情玮,燕鸿鹏.长江流域江苏段饮用水水源地水质安全评价与分析[J].科教文汇(上旬刊),2012(08):101-104.
    [109]解莹,李叙勇,王慧亮,李文赞.滦河流域上游地区主要河流水污染特征及评价[J].环境科学学报,2012(03):645-653
    [110]张婷,刘静玲,王雪梅.白洋淀水质时空变化及影响因子评价与分析[J].环境科学学报,2010(02):261-267.
    [111] C. Shin, E. Lee, P.L. McCarty, J. Bae.Effects of influent DO/COD ratio on theperformance of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor fed low-strength syntheticwastewater.Bioresour. Technol.,2011(102):9860–9865
    [112] M.A. Sánchez-Monedero, A. Roig, C. Paredes, M.P. Bernal.Nitrogentransformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and itseffects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures.Bioresour. Technol.,2001(78):301–308
    [113] Akbal F, Gürel L, Bahad r T et al Multivariate statistical techniques for theassessment of surface water quality at the mid-Black Sea Coast of Turkey. WaterAir Soil Poll2011,216(1):21–37.
    [114] Moradkhan H,Hsu K L,Gupta H V,et al. Improved streamflow forecasting usingself-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks[J].Journal ofHydrology,2004(295):246-262
    [115]蒋同斌,李继玲.基于多元统计分析的水环境质量评价及趋势分析[J].南京师范大学学报(工程技术版),2010(04):52-56.
    [116]谢森,何连生,田学达,席北斗,陈林,于会彬.巢湖水质时空分布模式研究[J].环境工程学报,2010(03):531-539.
    [117]富天乙,邹志红,王晓静.基于多元统计和水质标识指数的辽阳太子河水质评价研究[J].环境科学学报,2014(02):473-480.
    [118]刘劲夫,田百平,段海燕,等.上游来水超标情形下的水功能区水质达标评价方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2013(18):5251-5254.
    [119]赵来军,李怀祖.流域跨界水污染纠纷税收调控管理模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5):144-148.
    [120] Weller P. Transboundary River Management in the Danube Basin[J].2011.
    [121]华坚,吴祠金,黄德春.上下游型国际河流水资源分配冲突的博弈分析[J].水利经济,2013,31(3):33-36.
    [122]曾勇,杨志峰.官厅水库跨区域水质改善政策的冲突分析[J].水科学进展,2004,15(1):40-44.
    [123]高琪.长江流域建立统一的功能区水质达标责任制以及行政区界上下游水体断面水质交接责任制研究[J].法制与社会,2011(9):195-196.
    [124]徐劲草,许新宜,王红瑞,等.晋江流域上下游生态补偿机制[J].南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(2):57-62.
    [125]张晓宇,窦世卿.我国水资源管理现状及对策[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(3):91-95.
    [126]黄永基,陈晓军.我国水资源需求管理现状及发展趋势分析[J].水科学进展,2000,11(2):215-220.
    [127]温丽容,刘乙敏,刘国光,等.广东省跨市河流边界水质状况研究[J].生态环境,2004,13(2):177-179.
    [128]程声通.河流环境容量与允许排放量[J].水资源保护,2003,19(2):8-10.
    [129]董育宏.主要污染物减排监测工作的问题和对策[J].三峡环境与生态,2010(3):49-51.
    [130]杨积德.总量控制中污水排放口监测频次和时间的优化研究[J].中国环境监测,1991(6):013.
    [131]王宪恩,周佳龙,胡若漪,等.“监测频次少”情形下水功能区水质达标评价方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2013(28):8544-8549.
    [132]朱玉.抚仙湖水质监测频次的探讨[J].云南环境科学,1993(2):007.
    [133]刘三长,李桂祥.国控重点污染源废水监测频次的探讨[J].环境研究与监测,2009,22(4):49-52.
    [134]郭蓉,吴长年,张宁红,等.京杭运河(苏州段)水质时空分布特征分析[J].四川环境,2010,29(5):10-13.
    [135]许进,林木隆,郑冬燕.珠江流域综合管理指标研究[J].人民珠江,2013,34(A01):11-12.
    [136]徐高洪,郭生练.长江流域省际河流水事纠纷及对策措施探讨[J].人民长江,2008(17):6-8.
    [137]程方伟.关于跨行政区域江河流域的水质保护[J].中国环境管理,1988,(3):024.
    [138]李添萍,任珊.入河污染物排放对湟水水质的影响分析[J].人民黄河,2013,35(7):60-62.
    [139]王茹雪,赖万安.珠江流域片省际水事纠纷特点及处理意见[J].人民珠江,2011,34(05):4-5.
    [140]张利静.辽河源头区跨界断面水质预测研究[D].吉林大学,2013.
    [141]曹德扬.流域水资源管理中的出境水水质目标管理的思考[J].污染防治技术,2007,20(6):73-75.
    [142]辛明君,应建庆.无锡河网地区监测断面的合理布设[J].福建环境,1998,15(2):32-33.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700