真空管井降水机理研究
|
摘要
本文对真空管井降水法引起的地下水真空渗流场的几个主要方面进行了研究,研究方法和主要结果如下：
开展了现场实验研究。依托北京地铁14号线工程,开展了真空管井降水的现场实验,对出水量、真空度在水平和深度方向的传递、孔隙水压力以及真空沉降等方面进行了监测,得到了各项指标的变化规律。
进行了真空度分布规律研究。在气体运动符合达西定律的前提下,对气体的平面渗流模型和Paul C.Johnson模型进行了分析,得到了井径、井室压力和影响半径等对真空度传递规律的影响。
建立了饱和土孔隙水真空渗流场模型。将土体中气体的渗流规律与Dupuit等经典的地下水渗流理论相结合,得到了真空潜水完整井、真空承压水完整井以及真空潜水-承压水井作用下的出水量、水位和水头的分布、水力梯度的变化规律和解析解。为了验证理论分析的正确性,开展了室内抽水实验和数值模拟对理论分析模型进行了验证。
对非饱和土孔隙水真空渗流进行了研究。通过分析孔隙水受力情况,得出了重力排水的极限条件；通过分析非饱和土孔隙水的渗流条件,分析了气体补充量对孔隙水排出的作用机制,并通过实验进行了验证；通过对非饱和土土水特征曲线的研究,提出了将进气值作为真空渗流场影响半径的观点：运用有限差分法,对非饱和土孔隙水一维水平真空渗流模型进行了求解。
建立了真空条件下的沉降模型。基于真空度传递规律和水位分布模型,讨论了真空作用下仅考虑水位下降情况的沉降计算；建立了真空条件下的Imai模型、Chai J C模型、弹性力学模型和饱和土稳定渗流有效应力模型。
进行了真空管井降水的沉降预测。运用回归分析法、灰色理论模型GM(1,1)法和BP神经网络法对真空降水现场实验的沉降数据进行了预测分析。
对层间滞水真空渗流规律和降水方法进行了探讨。提出了层间滞水分布的3种形式：水平分布、凹陷分布和倾斜分布。提出了隔水层倾斜分布时真空井“爬坡”运行的降水施工方法。
This dissertation made studies on the major aspects of the vacuum seepage field, and the research methods and results are as follows:
A field test was made based on Beijing Subway Line14project, during which several aspects of vacuum tube well dewatering including water discharge, the transfer of vacuum degree both in horizontal and vertical directions, pore water pressure and vacuum settlement were monitored to get the changing law of various indicators.
The distribution law of vacuum degree was studied. Under the condition that Darcy's law is applicable to gas seepage, the plane seepage model and Paul C. Johnson model were analyzed to understand the effects of well diameter, well chamber pressure and influence radius on the transfer law of vacuum degree.
The vacuum seepage model of pore water in saturated soil was set up. Through studies combining the seepage law of gas in soil and classic groundwater seepage theories such as Dupuit theory, the changing law of water discharge, water level, water head distribution and hydraulic gradient under conditions of fully penetrating well in phreatic aquifer, fully penetrating well in confined aquifer as well as fully penetrating well in phreatic-confined aquifer was obtained and the analytical solutions were deduced further. Meanwhile, laboratory pumping experiment and numerical simulations by Modflow Software were conducted to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis.
The vacuum seepage of pore water in unsaturated soil was researched with the following results:deriving the limit conditions of gravity drainage based on analysis of the stress state of pore water; working out the influencing mechanism of gas supplement on pore water discharge based on analysis of seepage conditions of pore water in unsaturated soil and verifying the mechanism by experiment; proposing the view that takes the air entry value as the influence radius of vacuum seepage field; and making solutions of the one-dimensional horizontal vacuum seepage model of pore water in unsaturated soil using Finite Difference Method.
The settlement model under vacuum seepage condition was set up. According to the transfer law of vacuum degree and water level distribution model under vacuum field, settlement calculations under vacuum were discussed considering only water declining condition. Furthermore, several models under vacuum conditions were established including Imai model, Chai J C model, elasticity model and saturated soil seepage effective stress model.
The settlement under vacuum tube well dewatering was forecasted based on analysis of the settlement data of vacuum dewatering field test using Regression, Gray Theory Model GM (1,1) and BP Neural Network.
The vacuum seepage law and dewatering method of interlayer water were discussed with conclusions of3distribution forms of interlayer water including horizontal, sag and inclined distribution and the construction method when vacuum wells operate uphill under the condition of inclined distribution of aquiclude.
开展了现场实验研究。依托北京地铁14号线工程,开展了真空管井降水的现场实验,对出水量、真空度在水平和深度方向的传递、孔隙水压力以及真空沉降等方面进行了监测,得到了各项指标的变化规律。
进行了真空度分布规律研究。在气体运动符合达西定律的前提下,对气体的平面渗流模型和Paul C.Johnson模型进行了分析,得到了井径、井室压力和影响半径等对真空度传递规律的影响。
建立了饱和土孔隙水真空渗流场模型。将土体中气体的渗流规律与Dupuit等经典的地下水渗流理论相结合,得到了真空潜水完整井、真空承压水完整井以及真空潜水-承压水井作用下的出水量、水位和水头的分布、水力梯度的变化规律和解析解。为了验证理论分析的正确性,开展了室内抽水实验和数值模拟对理论分析模型进行了验证。
对非饱和土孔隙水真空渗流进行了研究。通过分析孔隙水受力情况,得出了重力排水的极限条件；通过分析非饱和土孔隙水的渗流条件,分析了气体补充量对孔隙水排出的作用机制,并通过实验进行了验证；通过对非饱和土土水特征曲线的研究,提出了将进气值作为真空渗流场影响半径的观点：运用有限差分法,对非饱和土孔隙水一维水平真空渗流模型进行了求解。
建立了真空条件下的沉降模型。基于真空度传递规律和水位分布模型,讨论了真空作用下仅考虑水位下降情况的沉降计算；建立了真空条件下的Imai模型、Chai J C模型、弹性力学模型和饱和土稳定渗流有效应力模型。
进行了真空管井降水的沉降预测。运用回归分析法、灰色理论模型GM(1,1)法和BP神经网络法对真空降水现场实验的沉降数据进行了预测分析。
对层间滞水真空渗流规律和降水方法进行了探讨。提出了层间滞水分布的3种形式：水平分布、凹陷分布和倾斜分布。提出了隔水层倾斜分布时真空井“爬坡”运行的降水施工方法。
This dissertation made studies on the major aspects of the vacuum seepage field, and the research methods and results are as follows:
A field test was made based on Beijing Subway Line14project, during which several aspects of vacuum tube well dewatering including water discharge, the transfer of vacuum degree both in horizontal and vertical directions, pore water pressure and vacuum settlement were monitored to get the changing law of various indicators.
The distribution law of vacuum degree was studied. Under the condition that Darcy's law is applicable to gas seepage, the plane seepage model and Paul C. Johnson model were analyzed to understand the effects of well diameter, well chamber pressure and influence radius on the transfer law of vacuum degree.
The vacuum seepage model of pore water in saturated soil was set up. Through studies combining the seepage law of gas in soil and classic groundwater seepage theories such as Dupuit theory, the changing law of water discharge, water level, water head distribution and hydraulic gradient under conditions of fully penetrating well in phreatic aquifer, fully penetrating well in confined aquifer as well as fully penetrating well in phreatic-confined aquifer was obtained and the analytical solutions were deduced further. Meanwhile, laboratory pumping experiment and numerical simulations by Modflow Software were conducted to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis.
The vacuum seepage of pore water in unsaturated soil was researched with the following results:deriving the limit conditions of gravity drainage based on analysis of the stress state of pore water; working out the influencing mechanism of gas supplement on pore water discharge based on analysis of seepage conditions of pore water in unsaturated soil and verifying the mechanism by experiment; proposing the view that takes the air entry value as the influence radius of vacuum seepage field; and making solutions of the one-dimensional horizontal vacuum seepage model of pore water in unsaturated soil using Finite Difference Method.
The settlement model under vacuum seepage condition was set up. According to the transfer law of vacuum degree and water level distribution model under vacuum field, settlement calculations under vacuum were discussed considering only water declining condition. Furthermore, several models under vacuum conditions were established including Imai model, Chai J C model, elasticity model and saturated soil seepage effective stress model.
The settlement under vacuum tube well dewatering was forecasted based on analysis of the settlement data of vacuum dewatering field test using Regression, Gray Theory Model GM (1,1) and BP Neural Network.
The vacuum seepage law and dewatering method of interlayer water were discussed with conclusions of3distribution forms of interlayer water including horizontal, sag and inclined distribution and the construction method when vacuum wells operate uphill under the condition of inclined distribution of aquiclude.
引文
Boudouch Otmane,Daoud Esrael,Mariem Kacem. Influence of Soil Air Permeability Change on Soil Vapour Extraction Systems Design.Clean-soil Air Water,2012,40(5):461-471.
Bouwer, H. Groundwater Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York,1978:100-103.
Buddhima Indraratna, F.ASCE, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, Jay Ameratunga, Peter Boyle. Performance and Prediction of Vacuum Combined Surcharge Consolidation at Port of Brisbane. Journal of Geotechnical And Geoenvironmental Engineering,2011,137(11):1009-1018.
Chai J, Ong C Y, Carter J P, et al. Lateral displacement under combined vacuum pressure and embankment loading. Geotechnique,2013,63(10):842-856.
D.G弗雷德隆德,H.拉哈尔佐.非饱和土力学,北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
Farhan S,Budiman J,Holsen TM. Experimental investigation of the interaction of soil air permeability and soil vapor extraction. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE,2002,128(2):120-130.
Feng Huang, Guihe Wang. The Influence of Air Injection on Effects of Vacuum Dewatering:Experimental Study on Vacuum-air Injection Dewatering Method. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.2012(U).
Feng Huang, Guihe Wang.One-dimensional Experiment Research on Vacuum Degree Transmission Law in Unsaturated Soil. EJGE,2012,17w.
Geng Xueyu, Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat. Effectiveness of partially penetrating vertical drains under a combined surcharge and vacuum preloading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2011,48(6):970-983.
Huang Feng,Wang Guihe, Yang Yuyou. Experimental Study of the Impact of Soil Particles Loss on Soil Settlement in Vacuum Dewatering. Advanced Materials Research.2013,639-640.
Hui Wu, Liming Hu. Analytical and numerical solutions for vacuum preloading considering a radius related strain distribution. Mechanics research communications, 2012,44:9-14.
Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Balasubramaniam A S, et al. Soft ground improvement via vertical drains and vacuum assisted preloading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2012,30:16-23.
Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat, Kelly Richard. Soft soil foundation improved by vacuum and surcharge preloading at ballina bypass, Australia. Ground Improvement Technologies and Case Histories,2009,95-105.
J.C.Chai, J.P.Carter, S.Hayashi. Ground deformation induced by vacuum consolidation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005, 131(12):1552-1561.
J.-C.Chai, N.Miura. Field vaper extraction test and long-term monitoring at a PCE contaminated site. Journal of hazardous materials,2004,110(1):85-92.
J.Saowapakpiboon, D.T.Bergado, P.Wanthong, P.Voottipruex, L.G.Lam, K.Nakakuma. PVD improvement combined with surcharge and vacuum preloading including simulations.Geotexiles and Geomembranes,2011,29(1):74-82.
J.Saowapakpiboon, D.T.Bergado, S.Youwai, J.C.Chai, P.Wanthong, P.Voottipruex. Measured and predicted performance of prefabricated vertical drains(PVDs) with and without vacuum preloading.Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010,28(1):1-11.
Jacob A, Thevanayagam S, Kavazanjian E. Vacuum-assisted consolidation of a hydraulic landfill//Vertical and horizontal deformations of foundations and embankments. ASCE,1994:1249-1261.
L. H. Li, Q Wang, N. X. Wang, J. P. Wang.Vacuum dewatering and horizontal drainage blankets:a method for layered soil reclamation.Bull Eng Geol Environ (2009) 68:277-285.
Mahfouz A H. Vacuum preloading combined electroosmotic strengthening of ultra-soft soil. Journal of Central South University,2013,20(11):3282-3295.
Peng J, Ji W G, Li N, et al. The Pore Water Pressure and Settlement Characteristics of Soil Improved by Combined Vacuum and Surcharge Preloading. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013,18.
Robinson Retnamony G,Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat. Final state of soils under vacuum preloading.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2012,49(6): 729-739.
Shu Chen,Yan yong Xiang. A procedure for theoretical estimation of dewatering-induced pile settlement. Computers and Geotechnics,2006,33(4): 278-282.
Sun Z, Gao M, Zhou W. Assessment of Vacuum Preloading of Soft Sediment Applied to Various Drainage Schemes. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2014,50(6):255-261.
Tuli A, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE. Comparison of air and water permeability between disturbed and undisturbed soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(5):1361-1371.
Wataru Tanikawa, Toshihiko Shimamoto. Comparison of Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability and water permeability in sedimentary rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2009,46(2):229-238.
Young-Suk Song, Tae-Hyung Kim. Improvement of estuarine marine clays for coastal reclamation using vacuum-applied consolidation method.Ocean Engineering, 2004,31(16):1999-2010.
曹永琅,丛建,吴晓峰.高速公路超软土地基的真空预压加固研究.岩土力学,2004,24(5)：771-775.
曾志姣,张家生,祝志恒.非饱和土坝稳态渗流场的差分求解.重庆建筑,2008(2)：16-19.
陈环.真空预压法机理研究十年.港口工程,1991,4:17-25.
陈析,周卫,洪宝宁.真空-堆载联合预压加固软基过程的数值分析.南京理工大学学报,2000,24(5)：457-461.
邓英尔,谢和平,黄润秋,刘慈群.低渗透微尺度孔隙气体渗流规律.力学与实践, 2005,27(2)：33-35.
董志良,陈平山,莫海鸿,张功新.真空预压下软土渗透系数对固结的影响.岩土力学,2010,31(5)：1452-1456.
段冰.真空一堆载联合预压的影响因素研究及数值分析(硕士论文).浙江大学,2005,3.
冯锦明,李炳芳.灰色预测模型在建筑物沉降监测中的应用.地矿测绘,2008(2)：7-9.
冯丽丽,李天文,韩羽.高层建筑物沉降预测方法的比较.天津城市建设学院学报,2007,13(1)：35-39.
冯正.试抽试验在真空预压软基中的应用.施工技术.2012,41(2):92-94.
付天宇.真空预压法加固性状研究中几个问题的探讨.路基工程,2008(5):89-90.
高树生,熊伟,刘先贵,胡志明,薛惠.低渗透砂岩气藏气体渗流机理实验研究现状及新认识.天然气工业,2010,30(1)：52-55.
高新闻,管兴坚.一种基坑地面沉降新型预测方法.计算机工程,2012,38(15):247-250.
龚晓南,岑仰润.真空预压加固软土地基机理探讨.哈尔滨建筑大学学报,2002,35(2):7-10.
何良德,姜晔.双曲型曲线模型在路基沉降预测中的应用.河海大学学报：自然科学版,2009,37(2)：200-205.
胡雪蛟,杜建华,王补宣.多孔结构微细化的渗流气体稀薄性效应与达西渗透率.热科学与技术,2003,2(2)：154-156.
胡勇.气体渗流启动压力实验测试及应用.天然气工业,2010,30(11):48-50.
黄国强,李鑫钢,姜斌,李凌,徐世民,干爱华.竖井SVE修复有机污染土壤的数值模拟分析.化工学报.2003,54(8)：1134-1140.
姜增国,刘伏成.软基真空预压加固沉降过程的数值模拟研究.岩土工程界,2006,8(10)：30-31.
焦珍,付晓刚,黄云飞,张希雨.无限透水坝基渗流场的有限差分数值模拟.南水北调与水利科技,2011,9(5)：123-126.
乐琪浪,赵常洲,杨为民.真空-堆载联合预压法加固软基过程中气、水、土变化规律的试验研究.建筑科学,2010,1：0-13.
李亨,张锡文.可压缩气体定常非Darcy渗流的流动分析及其应用.应用力学学报,2003,20(1)：1-4.
李虹兵,熊健,张涛.气体非线性渗流方程特征化研究.内江科技,2012(2):17-17.
李进,吴小庆.低渗透非达西气体渗流模型及计算方法.断块油气田,2007,13(5)：46-47.
李宁,李向凤,吴跃东.真空压力传递规律与渗透系数关系的试验研究.路基工程.2011(4):101-103.
李时亮.真空预压加固软土地基作用机理分析.岩土力学,2008,29(2):479-482.
李顺群,赵少飞,王学志.一维稳态渗流时非饱和土中的基质吸力分布.岩土力学,2006,1:90-94.
李晓云,赵宝平.非饱和土的渗透性函数试验研究.科技信息,2012,35:93-98.
李尧臣,周顺华.真空排水固结法处理软土地基的数值模拟.上海铁道大学学报,2000,21(10)：96-99.
李永乐,刘翠然,刘海宁,等.非饱和土的渗透特性试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(22)：3861-3865.
李宗坤,乔小琴,赵庆.改进的GM(1,1)灰色模型在大坝沉降预测中的应用.浙江水利水电专科学校学报,2010,22(2):1-4.
梁爱民,刘潇.非饱和土渗透系数的试验研究.井冈山大学学报(自然科学版)2012,33(2)：76-87.
林中湘.非饱和土水汽迁移规律试验研究.路基工程,2009(5):85-87.
刘翠然,郭进军,高轲.基质吸力对黄河大堤非饱和土渗透能力的影响.水电能源科学,2010,28(8):55-57.
刘奉银,张昭.增湿路径对非饱和土水气渗透系数的影响研究.水利学报,2008,39(8)：934-939.
刘海宁,姜形,刘汉东.非饱和土渗透函数方程的间接确定.岩土力学:2004,25(11)：1795-1799.
刘汉龙,扈胜霞,Ali Hassan.真空-堆载预压作用下软土蠕变特性试验研究.岩土力学,2008,29(1)：6-12.
刘洪,王新海,张福祥,牛新年.用拉普拉斯变换差分法求解试井分析中的一维渗流问题.计算物理,2012,29(2)：245-249.
刘嘉,张功新,罗彦,董志良.潜水含水层非稳定井流降水的有限差分分析.水运工程,2010(2)：70-74.
栾茂田,李顺群,杨庆.非饱和土的基质吸力和张力吸力.岩土工程学报,2006,28(7)：863-868.
骆祖江,刘昌军,瞿成松,罗建军.深基坑降水疏干过程中三维渗流场数值模拟研究.水文地质工程地质,2005,5:48-53.
马博恒,王晓明,李森林,孟杰.路堑边坡渗流场的有限差分分析与工程实例.勘察科学技术,2010(2)：42-45.
马全玲.真空预压加固数值分析方法的研究(硕士论文).天津大学,2009,8.
苗强强,陈正汉,张磊,黄雪峰,钱尼贵.非饱和黏土质砂的渗气规律试验研究.岩土力学,2010,31(12)：3746-3750.
明经平.真空预压加固机理及加卸荷变形特性研究(硕士论文).南京：南京水利科学研究院,2009.
偶昌宝,俞亚南,王战国.不等时距灰色Verhulst模型及其在沉降预测中的应用.江南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,1:63-65
潘秀明.真空管井复合降水技术应用研究(博士论文).北京：中国地质大学(北京).2009.
彭劫,董江平,宋恩润,洪雷.考虑加载过程的真空预压轴对称解析解.岩土力学,2010,31(S)：79-85.
彭劫,刘汉龙,陈永辉,陈育民.真空-堆载联合预压法处理大面积软基的简化数值分析.中国土术工程学会第九届士力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集.2003,10.
彭涛,杨岸英,梁杏,等.BP神经网络-灰色系统联合模型预测软基沉降量.岩土力学,2005,26(11)：1810-1814.
邵龙潭,梁爱民,王助贫,孙健.非饱和土稳态渗流试验装置的研制与应用.岩土工程学报,2004,27(11)：1338-1340.
施建勇,雷国辉,艾英钵,卫丹,宋雄伟.关于真空预压沉降计算的研究.岩土力学,2006,27(3)：365-368.
宋晶.分级真空预压法加固高粘性吹填土的模拟试验与三维颗粒流数值分析[D].吉林大学,2011,6.
孙大松,刘鹏,夏小和,王建华.非饱和土的渗透系数.水利学报,2004,3:71-75.
孙建乐.非饱和土水分迁移试验研究.西部探矿工程,2007,19(7):36-38.
孙立强,闫澍旺,李伟,吴坤标.超软土真空预压室内模型试验研究.岩土力学,2011,32(4):984-990.
王道成,李闽,谭建为,王明军,杨志均.气体低速非线性渗流研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2008,26(6)：74-77.
王峰,王慧玲.土壤气相抽提影响半径及透气率现场试验.环境科学与技术,2011,34(7):134-137.
王慧玲,王峰,陈素云,等.土壤气相抽提技术去污规律及土层压力变化特征分析.环境污染与防治,2012,33(12):48-51.
王金勋,吴晓东,潘新伟.孔隙网络模型法计算水相滞留对气体渗流的影响.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5).
王澎,王峰,陈素云.SVE法修复污染场地所需工艺参数的确定.环境工程,2010,28(6):108-112.
王艳.真空预压法处理地基的加固特性及数值模拟(硕士论文).同济大学,2007,3.
王永胜,谢定义.非饱和土中孔隙水的运动特性及渗水系数的测算.西北水资源与水工程,1993,4(3)：63-67.
王玉.某焦化厂气相抽提方法污染修复数值模拟分析.工程勘察.2010,1(S):797-801.
魏波,贺怀建.真空-堆载联合预压处理软基效果的室内试验研究.岩土力学,2003,10(24)：553-556.
魏迎奇,孙玉莲.大坝沉降变形的灰色预测分析研究.中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2010,8(1)：25-29.
文章,黄冠华,李健,等.承压含水层中扩展井附近非达西流数值解.水利学报,2009,40(4):398-402.
吴桂芬,高玉峰,魏代现,刘汉龙.真空和堆载两种预压法的室内试验研究.岩土力学,2005,26(S):95-98.
吴跃东,殷宗泽,郭纪中.真空联合堆载预压法加固水工建筑物软基效果检验.岩土力学,2007,28(4):738-742.
习志雄.真空预压法处理吹填淤泥质软土地基的颗粒流数值模拟(硕士论文).北京交通大学,2010,7.
谢立全,牛永昌,刘芳,等.真空联合注气降水机理的数值分析.地下空间与工程学报,2009,2.
徐飞.非饱和膨胀土的试验研究(硕士论文).中国地质大学(北京),2013.
徐进,王旭东,刘运航.地下水向水平井三维流动的有限层分析.岩土力学,2011,32(3)：922-926.
徐锴,梅国雄,宰金珉,等.真空预压土体的变形研究.岩土力学,2007,28(11)：2471-2474.
徐乃芳.真空堆载联合预压加固软土地基固结特性及数值模拟研究(硕士论 文).南京大学,2008.
徐鑫鑫,苏华友,张春萍.BP神经网络在基坑周边地表短期沉降预测中的应用.四川理工学院学报：自然科学版,2013,26(2)：35-38.
闫健,张宁生,刘晓娟,等.低渗气藏单相气体渗流特征分析.西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2010(1):41-44.
严露,张仪萍,李剑.真空预压加固软基的平面应变数值计算.低温建筑技术,2011(5)：64-66.
严绍洋,李亮辉,张春宇.公路隧道开挖渗流场的有限差分法分析.中外公路,2008,27(6)：120-123.
颜永国.真空荷载下不同颗粒级配软土真空度传递规律试验研究.水运工程,2010(10)：109-112.
杨栋,赵阳升,胡耀青,等.三维应力作用下单一裂缝中气体渗流规律的理论与实验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(6)：999-1003.
杨乐巍.土壤气相抽提(SVE)现场试验研究(硕士论文).天津大学化工学院,2006.
姚广聚,彭红利,熊钰,等.低渗透砂岩气藏气体渗流特征.油气地质与采收率,2009,16(4)：104-105.
叶礼友,高树生,熊伟,等.储层压力条件下低渗砂岩气藏气体渗流特征.复杂油气藏,2011,4(1)：59-62.
叶为民,王初生,王琼,等.非饱和粘性土中气体渗透特征.工程地质学报,2009,2：244-248.
伊怀建,朱维耀,张明江,等.低渗透致密储层气体低速非达西渗流地层压力分布及产能分析.特种油气藏,2012,19(1):70-73.
尹盛斌,丁红岩.深基坑施工时地表沉降预测的时序-投影寻踪回归模型.岩土力学,2011,32(2)：369-374.
于伟.真空管井降水的室内实验研究(硕士论文)中国地质大学(北京),2008.
袁益让.多层非线性渗流耦合系统的特征分数步差分方法.数学物理学报：A辑,2009,29(4)：858-872.
袁益让.多层渗流方程组合系统的迎风分数步长差分方法和应用.中国科学：A辑,2001,31(9)：791-806.
袁益让.三维非线性多层渗流方程耦合系统的差分方法.中国科学：A辑,2006,35(12)：1397-1423.
张功新,莫海鸿,董志良,等.真空预压中真空度与孔隙水压力的关系分析.岩土力学,2005,26(12)：1949-1952.
张广明,李幽静,孙玉庆.真空预压中负压荷载的传递.岩土工程界,2009(10)：74-76.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(一).水文地质工程地质,1980,1.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(二).水文地质工程地质,1980,3.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(三).水文地质工程地质,1980,3.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(四).水文地质工程地质,1980,4.
张雪东,赵成刚,刘艳.变形对非饱和土渗透系数影响规律模拟研究.工程地质学报,2010,18(1)：132-139.
张雪东.土水特征曲线及其在非饱和土力学中应用的基本问题研究(博士论文).北京：北京交通大学,2010.
张引科,昝会萍.非饱和土的渗透函数方程.西安理工大学学报,2001,17(2):174-177.
赵常洲.高速公路软基真空-堆载联合预压加固机理及其数值模拟(博士论文).中国地质大学(北京),2008,4.
赵继涛.含水率对低渗透煤层气体渗流影响的实验研究.鸡西大学学报：综合版,2010,10(4):46-46.
赵天石.一个双层渗流系统耦合结构地下水资源评价有限差分计算实例.水文地质工程地质,1985,6:0-8.
周克明,李宁,袁小玲.残余水状态下低渗储层气体低速渗流机理.天然气工业,2003,23(6):103-106.
朱光亚,刘先贵,李树铁,等.低渗气藏气体渗流滑脱效应影响研究.地质与勘探,2007,5:44-47.
朱建才,温晓贵,龚晓南,等.真空排水预压法中真空度分布的影响因素分析.哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,35(11)：1399-1401.
朱群峰,高长胜,杨守华,等.超软淤泥地基处理中真空度传递特性研究.岩土工程学报,2010,32(9):1429-1433.
李江,张明中,王代兵.不等径引渗井在处理深基坑残留滞水中的应用.西部探矿工程,2004,16(11)：15-17.
王俊川,蒋学茂,陈树军.某工程基坑支护过程中上层滞水处理和利用.施工技术,2011,S2.
Bouwer, H. Groundwater Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York,1978:100-103.
Buddhima Indraratna, F.ASCE, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, Jay Ameratunga, Peter Boyle. Performance and Prediction of Vacuum Combined Surcharge Consolidation at Port of Brisbane. Journal of Geotechnical And Geoenvironmental Engineering,2011,137(11):1009-1018.
Chai J, Ong C Y, Carter J P, et al. Lateral displacement under combined vacuum pressure and embankment loading. Geotechnique,2013,63(10):842-856.
D.G弗雷德隆德,H.拉哈尔佐.非饱和土力学,北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
Farhan S,Budiman J,Holsen TM. Experimental investigation of the interaction of soil air permeability and soil vapor extraction. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE,2002,128(2):120-130.
Feng Huang, Guihe Wang. The Influence of Air Injection on Effects of Vacuum Dewatering:Experimental Study on Vacuum-air Injection Dewatering Method. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.2012(U).
Feng Huang, Guihe Wang.One-dimensional Experiment Research on Vacuum Degree Transmission Law in Unsaturated Soil. EJGE,2012,17w.
Geng Xueyu, Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat. Effectiveness of partially penetrating vertical drains under a combined surcharge and vacuum preloading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2011,48(6):970-983.
Huang Feng,Wang Guihe, Yang Yuyou. Experimental Study of the Impact of Soil Particles Loss on Soil Settlement in Vacuum Dewatering. Advanced Materials Research.2013,639-640.
Hui Wu, Liming Hu. Analytical and numerical solutions for vacuum preloading considering a radius related strain distribution. Mechanics research communications, 2012,44:9-14.
Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Balasubramaniam A S, et al. Soft ground improvement via vertical drains and vacuum assisted preloading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2012,30:16-23.
Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat, Kelly Richard. Soft soil foundation improved by vacuum and surcharge preloading at ballina bypass, Australia. Ground Improvement Technologies and Case Histories,2009,95-105.
J.C.Chai, J.P.Carter, S.Hayashi. Ground deformation induced by vacuum consolidation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005, 131(12):1552-1561.
J.-C.Chai, N.Miura. Field vaper extraction test and long-term monitoring at a PCE contaminated site. Journal of hazardous materials,2004,110(1):85-92.
J.Saowapakpiboon, D.T.Bergado, P.Wanthong, P.Voottipruex, L.G.Lam, K.Nakakuma. PVD improvement combined with surcharge and vacuum preloading including simulations.Geotexiles and Geomembranes,2011,29(1):74-82.
J.Saowapakpiboon, D.T.Bergado, S.Youwai, J.C.Chai, P.Wanthong, P.Voottipruex. Measured and predicted performance of prefabricated vertical drains(PVDs) with and without vacuum preloading.Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010,28(1):1-11.
Jacob A, Thevanayagam S, Kavazanjian E. Vacuum-assisted consolidation of a hydraulic landfill//Vertical and horizontal deformations of foundations and embankments. ASCE,1994:1249-1261.
L. H. Li, Q Wang, N. X. Wang, J. P. Wang.Vacuum dewatering and horizontal drainage blankets:a method for layered soil reclamation.Bull Eng Geol Environ (2009) 68:277-285.
Mahfouz A H. Vacuum preloading combined electroosmotic strengthening of ultra-soft soil. Journal of Central South University,2013,20(11):3282-3295.
Peng J, Ji W G, Li N, et al. The Pore Water Pressure and Settlement Characteristics of Soil Improved by Combined Vacuum and Surcharge Preloading. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013,18.
Robinson Retnamony G,Indraratna Buddhima, Rujikiatkamjorn Cholachat. Final state of soils under vacuum preloading.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2012,49(6): 729-739.
Shu Chen,Yan yong Xiang. A procedure for theoretical estimation of dewatering-induced pile settlement. Computers and Geotechnics,2006,33(4): 278-282.
Sun Z, Gao M, Zhou W. Assessment of Vacuum Preloading of Soft Sediment Applied to Various Drainage Schemes. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2014,50(6):255-261.
Tuli A, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE. Comparison of air and water permeability between disturbed and undisturbed soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(5):1361-1371.
Wataru Tanikawa, Toshihiko Shimamoto. Comparison of Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability and water permeability in sedimentary rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2009,46(2):229-238.
Young-Suk Song, Tae-Hyung Kim. Improvement of estuarine marine clays for coastal reclamation using vacuum-applied consolidation method.Ocean Engineering, 2004,31(16):1999-2010.
曹永琅,丛建,吴晓峰.高速公路超软土地基的真空预压加固研究.岩土力学,2004,24(5)：771-775.
曾志姣,张家生,祝志恒.非饱和土坝稳态渗流场的差分求解.重庆建筑,2008(2)：16-19.
陈环.真空预压法机理研究十年.港口工程,1991,4:17-25.
陈析,周卫,洪宝宁.真空-堆载联合预压加固软基过程的数值分析.南京理工大学学报,2000,24(5)：457-461.
邓英尔,谢和平,黄润秋,刘慈群.低渗透微尺度孔隙气体渗流规律.力学与实践, 2005,27(2)：33-35.
董志良,陈平山,莫海鸿,张功新.真空预压下软土渗透系数对固结的影响.岩土力学,2010,31(5)：1452-1456.
段冰.真空一堆载联合预压的影响因素研究及数值分析(硕士论文).浙江大学,2005,3.
冯锦明,李炳芳.灰色预测模型在建筑物沉降监测中的应用.地矿测绘,2008(2)：7-9.
冯丽丽,李天文,韩羽.高层建筑物沉降预测方法的比较.天津城市建设学院学报,2007,13(1)：35-39.
冯正.试抽试验在真空预压软基中的应用.施工技术.2012,41(2):92-94.
付天宇.真空预压法加固性状研究中几个问题的探讨.路基工程,2008(5):89-90.
高树生,熊伟,刘先贵,胡志明,薛惠.低渗透砂岩气藏气体渗流机理实验研究现状及新认识.天然气工业,2010,30(1)：52-55.
高新闻,管兴坚.一种基坑地面沉降新型预测方法.计算机工程,2012,38(15):247-250.
龚晓南,岑仰润.真空预压加固软土地基机理探讨.哈尔滨建筑大学学报,2002,35(2):7-10.
何良德,姜晔.双曲型曲线模型在路基沉降预测中的应用.河海大学学报：自然科学版,2009,37(2)：200-205.
胡雪蛟,杜建华,王补宣.多孔结构微细化的渗流气体稀薄性效应与达西渗透率.热科学与技术,2003,2(2)：154-156.
胡勇.气体渗流启动压力实验测试及应用.天然气工业,2010,30(11):48-50.
黄国强,李鑫钢,姜斌,李凌,徐世民,干爱华.竖井SVE修复有机污染土壤的数值模拟分析.化工学报.2003,54(8)：1134-1140.
姜增国,刘伏成.软基真空预压加固沉降过程的数值模拟研究.岩土工程界,2006,8(10)：30-31.
焦珍,付晓刚,黄云飞,张希雨.无限透水坝基渗流场的有限差分数值模拟.南水北调与水利科技,2011,9(5)：123-126.
乐琪浪,赵常洲,杨为民.真空-堆载联合预压法加固软基过程中气、水、土变化规律的试验研究.建筑科学,2010,1：0-13.
李亨,张锡文.可压缩气体定常非Darcy渗流的流动分析及其应用.应用力学学报,2003,20(1)：1-4.
李虹兵,熊健,张涛.气体非线性渗流方程特征化研究.内江科技,2012(2):17-17.
李进,吴小庆.低渗透非达西气体渗流模型及计算方法.断块油气田,2007,13(5)：46-47.
李宁,李向凤,吴跃东.真空压力传递规律与渗透系数关系的试验研究.路基工程.2011(4):101-103.
李时亮.真空预压加固软土地基作用机理分析.岩土力学,2008,29(2):479-482.
李顺群,赵少飞,王学志.一维稳态渗流时非饱和土中的基质吸力分布.岩土力学,2006,1:90-94.
李晓云,赵宝平.非饱和土的渗透性函数试验研究.科技信息,2012,35:93-98.
李尧臣,周顺华.真空排水固结法处理软土地基的数值模拟.上海铁道大学学报,2000,21(10)：96-99.
李永乐,刘翠然,刘海宁,等.非饱和土的渗透特性试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(22)：3861-3865.
李宗坤,乔小琴,赵庆.改进的GM(1,1)灰色模型在大坝沉降预测中的应用.浙江水利水电专科学校学报,2010,22(2):1-4.
梁爱民,刘潇.非饱和土渗透系数的试验研究.井冈山大学学报(自然科学版)2012,33(2)：76-87.
林中湘.非饱和土水汽迁移规律试验研究.路基工程,2009(5):85-87.
刘翠然,郭进军,高轲.基质吸力对黄河大堤非饱和土渗透能力的影响.水电能源科学,2010,28(8):55-57.
刘奉银,张昭.增湿路径对非饱和土水气渗透系数的影响研究.水利学报,2008,39(8)：934-939.
刘海宁,姜形,刘汉东.非饱和土渗透函数方程的间接确定.岩土力学:2004,25(11)：1795-1799.
刘汉龙,扈胜霞,Ali Hassan.真空-堆载预压作用下软土蠕变特性试验研究.岩土力学,2008,29(1)：6-12.
刘洪,王新海,张福祥,牛新年.用拉普拉斯变换差分法求解试井分析中的一维渗流问题.计算物理,2012,29(2)：245-249.
刘嘉,张功新,罗彦,董志良.潜水含水层非稳定井流降水的有限差分分析.水运工程,2010(2)：70-74.
栾茂田,李顺群,杨庆.非饱和土的基质吸力和张力吸力.岩土工程学报,2006,28(7)：863-868.
骆祖江,刘昌军,瞿成松,罗建军.深基坑降水疏干过程中三维渗流场数值模拟研究.水文地质工程地质,2005,5:48-53.
马博恒,王晓明,李森林,孟杰.路堑边坡渗流场的有限差分分析与工程实例.勘察科学技术,2010(2)：42-45.
马全玲.真空预压加固数值分析方法的研究(硕士论文).天津大学,2009,8.
苗强强,陈正汉,张磊,黄雪峰,钱尼贵.非饱和黏土质砂的渗气规律试验研究.岩土力学,2010,31(12)：3746-3750.
明经平.真空预压加固机理及加卸荷变形特性研究(硕士论文).南京：南京水利科学研究院,2009.
偶昌宝,俞亚南,王战国.不等时距灰色Verhulst模型及其在沉降预测中的应用.江南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,1:63-65
潘秀明.真空管井复合降水技术应用研究(博士论文).北京：中国地质大学(北京).2009.
彭劫,董江平,宋恩润,洪雷.考虑加载过程的真空预压轴对称解析解.岩土力学,2010,31(S)：79-85.
彭劫,刘汉龙,陈永辉,陈育民.真空-堆载联合预压法处理大面积软基的简化数值分析.中国土术工程学会第九届士力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集.2003,10.
彭涛,杨岸英,梁杏,等.BP神经网络-灰色系统联合模型预测软基沉降量.岩土力学,2005,26(11)：1810-1814.
邵龙潭,梁爱民,王助贫,孙健.非饱和土稳态渗流试验装置的研制与应用.岩土工程学报,2004,27(11)：1338-1340.
施建勇,雷国辉,艾英钵,卫丹,宋雄伟.关于真空预压沉降计算的研究.岩土力学,2006,27(3)：365-368.
宋晶.分级真空预压法加固高粘性吹填土的模拟试验与三维颗粒流数值分析[D].吉林大学,2011,6.
孙大松,刘鹏,夏小和,王建华.非饱和土的渗透系数.水利学报,2004,3:71-75.
孙建乐.非饱和土水分迁移试验研究.西部探矿工程,2007,19(7):36-38.
孙立强,闫澍旺,李伟,吴坤标.超软土真空预压室内模型试验研究.岩土力学,2011,32(4):984-990.
王道成,李闽,谭建为,王明军,杨志均.气体低速非线性渗流研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2008,26(6)：74-77.
王峰,王慧玲.土壤气相抽提影响半径及透气率现场试验.环境科学与技术,2011,34(7):134-137.
王慧玲,王峰,陈素云,等.土壤气相抽提技术去污规律及土层压力变化特征分析.环境污染与防治,2012,33(12):48-51.
王金勋,吴晓东,潘新伟.孔隙网络模型法计算水相滞留对气体渗流的影响.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5).
王澎,王峰,陈素云.SVE法修复污染场地所需工艺参数的确定.环境工程,2010,28(6):108-112.
王艳.真空预压法处理地基的加固特性及数值模拟(硕士论文).同济大学,2007,3.
王永胜,谢定义.非饱和土中孔隙水的运动特性及渗水系数的测算.西北水资源与水工程,1993,4(3)：63-67.
王玉.某焦化厂气相抽提方法污染修复数值模拟分析.工程勘察.2010,1(S):797-801.
魏波,贺怀建.真空-堆载联合预压处理软基效果的室内试验研究.岩土力学,2003,10(24)：553-556.
魏迎奇,孙玉莲.大坝沉降变形的灰色预测分析研究.中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2010,8(1)：25-29.
文章,黄冠华,李健,等.承压含水层中扩展井附近非达西流数值解.水利学报,2009,40(4):398-402.
吴桂芬,高玉峰,魏代现,刘汉龙.真空和堆载两种预压法的室内试验研究.岩土力学,2005,26(S):95-98.
吴跃东,殷宗泽,郭纪中.真空联合堆载预压法加固水工建筑物软基效果检验.岩土力学,2007,28(4):738-742.
习志雄.真空预压法处理吹填淤泥质软土地基的颗粒流数值模拟(硕士论文).北京交通大学,2010,7.
谢立全,牛永昌,刘芳,等.真空联合注气降水机理的数值分析.地下空间与工程学报,2009,2.
徐飞.非饱和膨胀土的试验研究(硕士论文).中国地质大学(北京),2013.
徐进,王旭东,刘运航.地下水向水平井三维流动的有限层分析.岩土力学,2011,32(3)：922-926.
徐锴,梅国雄,宰金珉,等.真空预压土体的变形研究.岩土力学,2007,28(11)：2471-2474.
徐乃芳.真空堆载联合预压加固软土地基固结特性及数值模拟研究(硕士论 文).南京大学,2008.
徐鑫鑫,苏华友,张春萍.BP神经网络在基坑周边地表短期沉降预测中的应用.四川理工学院学报：自然科学版,2013,26(2)：35-38.
闫健,张宁生,刘晓娟,等.低渗气藏单相气体渗流特征分析.西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2010(1):41-44.
严露,张仪萍,李剑.真空预压加固软基的平面应变数值计算.低温建筑技术,2011(5)：64-66.
严绍洋,李亮辉,张春宇.公路隧道开挖渗流场的有限差分法分析.中外公路,2008,27(6)：120-123.
颜永国.真空荷载下不同颗粒级配软土真空度传递规律试验研究.水运工程,2010(10)：109-112.
杨栋,赵阳升,胡耀青,等.三维应力作用下单一裂缝中气体渗流规律的理论与实验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(6)：999-1003.
杨乐巍.土壤气相抽提(SVE)现场试验研究(硕士论文).天津大学化工学院,2006.
姚广聚,彭红利,熊钰,等.低渗透砂岩气藏气体渗流特征.油气地质与采收率,2009,16(4)：104-105.
叶礼友,高树生,熊伟,等.储层压力条件下低渗砂岩气藏气体渗流特征.复杂油气藏,2011,4(1)：59-62.
叶为民,王初生,王琼,等.非饱和粘性土中气体渗透特征.工程地质学报,2009,2：244-248.
伊怀建,朱维耀,张明江,等.低渗透致密储层气体低速非达西渗流地层压力分布及产能分析.特种油气藏,2012,19(1):70-73.
尹盛斌,丁红岩.深基坑施工时地表沉降预测的时序-投影寻踪回归模型.岩土力学,2011,32(2)：369-374.
于伟.真空管井降水的室内实验研究(硕士论文)中国地质大学(北京),2008.
袁益让.多层非线性渗流耦合系统的特征分数步差分方法.数学物理学报：A辑,2009,29(4)：858-872.
袁益让.多层渗流方程组合系统的迎风分数步长差分方法和应用.中国科学：A辑,2001,31(9)：791-806.
袁益让.三维非线性多层渗流方程耦合系统的差分方法.中国科学：A辑,2006,35(12)：1397-1423.
张功新,莫海鸿,董志良,等.真空预压中真空度与孔隙水压力的关系分析.岩土力学,2005,26(12)：1949-1952.
张广明,李幽静,孙玉庆.真空预压中负压荷载的传递.岩土工程界,2009(10)：74-76.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(一).水文地质工程地质,1980,1.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(二).水文地质工程地质,1980,3.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(三).水文地质工程地质,1980,3.
张宏仁.解地下水渗流问题的有限差分法(四).水文地质工程地质,1980,4.
张雪东,赵成刚,刘艳.变形对非饱和土渗透系数影响规律模拟研究.工程地质学报,2010,18(1)：132-139.
张雪东.土水特征曲线及其在非饱和土力学中应用的基本问题研究(博士论文).北京：北京交通大学,2010.
张引科,昝会萍.非饱和土的渗透函数方程.西安理工大学学报,2001,17(2):174-177.
赵常洲.高速公路软基真空-堆载联合预压加固机理及其数值模拟(博士论文).中国地质大学(北京),2008,4.
赵继涛.含水率对低渗透煤层气体渗流影响的实验研究.鸡西大学学报：综合版,2010,10(4):46-46.
赵天石.一个双层渗流系统耦合结构地下水资源评价有限差分计算实例.水文地质工程地质,1985,6:0-8.
周克明,李宁,袁小玲.残余水状态下低渗储层气体低速渗流机理.天然气工业,2003,23(6):103-106.
朱光亚,刘先贵,李树铁,等.低渗气藏气体渗流滑脱效应影响研究.地质与勘探,2007,5:44-47.
朱建才,温晓贵,龚晓南,等.真空排水预压法中真空度分布的影响因素分析.哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,35(11)：1399-1401.
朱群峰,高长胜,杨守华,等.超软淤泥地基处理中真空度传递特性研究.岩土工程学报,2010,32(9):1429-1433.
李江,张明中,王代兵.不等径引渗井在处理深基坑残留滞水中的应用.西部探矿工程,2004,16(11)：15-17.
王俊川,蒋学茂,陈树军.某工程基坑支护过程中上层滞水处理和利用.施工技术,2011,S2.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |