用户名: 密码: 验证码:
河南烤烟生产比较优势、产量波动和烟叶化学成分影响因素研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法,对河南全省及8个主产烟县5年的392个烟叶样本化学成分、3362个土壤烤烟样品的各项指标进行了测试分析,对烟区30年的气候等相关资料进行分析,系统研究了河南烟叶生产比较优势的差异、烟叶产量波动的原因;分析了河南种植品种,研究了气候因素的变化与烟叶化学成分的关系,建立了烤烟烟叶化学成分与气候因子之间的关系模型;研究了河南烟区土壤主要养分含量的丰缺状况,划分了河南烟区植烟土壤养分等级;分析了河南烟区土壤养分与烟叶养分的关系。主要结论如下:
     1、分析了河南省烤烟生产累计28年的总产量、播种面积和单位面积产量数据。从长期看,目前河南省烤烟产量虽然仍处在下降阶段,但下降的速度越来越缓慢,可以预计在未来2~3年间新的拐点将出现,河南省烤烟产量将重拾上升势头。从短期看,河南烤烟生产波动频繁、剧烈,稳定性较差,从熨平河南省烤烟生产周期性波动,促进河南省烤烟生产稳定发展方面考虑,首先,稳定烤烟种植面积,加强基本烟田保护,尤其是适宜区优质植烟土地。其次,加强基础设施建设,通过加强基础设施建设,建立灾害保险体系,提高烟叶生产抵御旱涝等自然灾害的能力,确保烟农灾年不绝收。第三,充分发挥价格信号的导向作用,引导农民合理安排烤烟生产,促进烟叶生产稳定发展。第四,建立“补贴于土”的政策,引导农民自觉地实施土壤改良,有意识地增加有机肥、绿色肥的施用,从而实现土地的可持续发展。
     2、对全省12个产区烟叶生产的规模比较优势、效率比较优势和综合比较优势进行了分析。洛阳、三门峡、许昌、漯河、平顶山等5个地区烟叶生产比较优势明显。根据要素禀赋和资源特征,立足于比较优势的发挥,通过研究发现应把充分挖掘各地区烤烟生产的增长潜力,努力提高主产区烤烟生产水平,作为河南省烤烟生产发展策略的基本出发点和主要取向。通过比较各产区规模比较优势、效率比较优势和综合比较优势,发现河南省烤烟生产的综合比较优势主要集中在洛阳、三门峡、许昌、漯河、平顶山等5个地区,其中三门峡的综合比较优势尤为突出;而商丘、周口和信阳的综合比较优势指数基本上历年都小于1,它们的烤烟生产没有优势可言。从动态变化上看,三门峡的综合比较优势有进一步增强的趋势;许昌、漯河、平顶山的综合比较优势逐渐变弱,平顶山在进入90年代中后期其综合比较优势指数下降较快,三门峡的综合比较优势则不断走强;南阳由综合比较劣势转变为综合比较优势;驻马店由综合比较优势变为综合比较劣势。3、基于化学成分对河南烤烟品种进行了综合评价。应用DTOPSIS法对河南种植的8个品种6种化学成分进行综合评价。利用决策矩阵R中的决策分量与“理想解”和“负理想解”的距离进行品种比较。结果表明K326的C i值最大,该品种不仅钾素含量较高,而且其它主要性状接近“理想解”,是一个综合性状较好的品种;除K326外,其它品种的综合评价结果为:云烟87>RG17>云烟85>CF965>中烟9203>CF978>NC89。
     4、分析了不同产区、不同年份河南烟叶化学成分的关系。采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法,通过对河南烟区2001年~2005年的8个主产烟县烤烟661个烟叶样品5种化学成分分析,得出如下结论:烟叶化学成分在年际间存在变异,在不同部位间也存在差异。变异的大小在不同的化学成分间也不相同。以烟碱和总氮年际间变异较小,而总糖、钾、氯年际间变异较大。
     5、分析了河南烟叶不同时期气候因素与烟叶化学成分的关系。对全省8个主产烟县35年烤烟大田生长期4~9月的逐旬积温、逐旬日照时数和逐旬降水量数据进行分析,把烟叶各生长期气候因素与化学成分进行回归分析,从而得出气候与烟叶化学成分关系。得出以下结论:
     (1)还苗期温、光、水等气候因子对总植物碱、总糖、氮的累积基本没有影响;降水和温度对氯离子的吸收有一定抑制作用,分别达到0.003个单位和0.0004个单位;降水和日照对钾离子的吸收也有不同程度的抑制作用,分别为0.0001个单位和0.0006个单位。
     (2)伸根期温度对总植物碱的累积有较为明显的促进作用,为0.037个单位,对总糖的累积也有一定的促进作用,为0.162个单位;伸根期氮的积累则与温、光、水这三个气候因子基本无关;伸根期日照时数与氯离子的吸收呈反相关关系,为0.0006个单位;伸根期温度对于钾离子的吸收有较为明显的抑制作用,为0.025个单位。
     (3)旺长期温度对于总植物碱的累积有一定促进作用,为0.02个单位;降水对于总糖的合成则有一定的抑制作用,为0.04个单位;气候因子温、光、水对氮的吸收和积累没有影响;旺长期日照时数的增加则可以抑制氯的吸收和积累为0.0004个单位;温度和光照的增加对于钾离子的吸收和积累具有较为显著的抑制作用为0.021个单位和0.001个单位。
     (4)成熟期对总植物碱累积有显著抑制作用的是降水和日照这两个气候因子,影响程度分别为0.01个单位和0.001个单位,而温度则有一定的促进作用,为0.022个单位;气候因子对于总糖的累积影响均不显著;成熟期气候因素对于氮素的吸收和积累有一定的影响,温度能够促进含氮化合物的合成,影响程度为0.014个单位,降水和光照对氮的吸收和积累有一定的抑制作用,分别为0.0003个单位和0.0007个单位;温度和降水在一定程度上能够抑制成熟期氯离子的吸收和积累,大小分别为0.012个单位和0.0002个单位;成熟期温度、降水、日照等气候因子对于钾离子的吸收和积累均有较为明显的抑制作用,大小分别为0.025个单位,0.0006个单位,0.001个单位。
     6、分析了河南烟区植烟土壤有机质、pH及大量、中量、微量元素的分布状况。对河南省主产烟区3362个土壤样品进行测试分析,结果表明:
     (1)河南烟区植烟土壤有机质含量各地平均值都大于10.0 g·kg-1,总体较少,小于15.0 g·kg-1的标准,低于湖南的15.0 g·kg-1,平均为13.3±3.2 g·kg-1,变异性小,变异系数为24.47%。河南8个重点植烟县植烟土壤有机质含量以襄城最高,为15.2 g·kg-1,以方城最低,为11.3 g·kg-1。由高到低顺序是灵宝、襄城﹥郏县﹥邓州﹥宜阳﹥泌阳﹥卢氏﹥方城。
     (2)河南烟区土壤pH总体含量适宜,平均为7.56±0.62,变幅为5.4~9.35,变异程度较小,变异系数为8.26%。其中,最适宜烤烟生长的土壤pH在6~7之间的样本占20.4%,适宜烤烟生长的土壤pH在6.0~8.0之间的样本占79.5%,影响烤烟生长的土壤pH>9.0的样本分别占1%。河南重点产烟县不同烟区土壤pH的大小顺序是襄城>灵宝>卢氏>宜阳>方城>泌阳>郏县>邓州。
     (3)河南省植烟土壤全氮含量总体较适宜,平均为0.84±0.16 g·kg-1,变异性小,变异系数为19.31%。河南主要产烟县植烟土壤全氮含量高低顺序为:灵宝﹥宜阳﹥邓州﹥襄城﹥卢氏﹥泌阳﹥郏县﹥方城,其顺序与有机质含量基本相同。河南省植烟土壤速效氮含量总体较适宜,平均为57.68±21.03 mg·kg-1,变异性小,变异系数为36.47%。河南省主要产烟县植烟土壤碱解氮含量高低顺序与各产区土壤有机质和全氮含量顺序有相似的趋势:泌阳﹥郏县﹥灵宝﹥邓州﹥方城﹥卢氏﹥襄城﹥宜阳。
     (4)河南省植烟土壤全磷含量总体适中,平均为0.84±0.16 g·kg-1,变异性小,变异系数为38.45%。各主产烟县植烟土壤全磷含量高低顺序是灵宝﹥宜阳﹥邓州﹥卢氏﹥泌阳﹥郏县﹥方城﹥襄城。河南省植烟土壤速效磷总体含量偏高,平均为12.89±9.15 g·kg-1,存在一定变异,变异系数为9.15%。河南省主产烟县植烟土壤速效磷含量高低顺序是泌阳﹥邓州﹥宜阳﹥灵宝﹥卢氏﹥郏县﹥方城﹥襄城。
     (5)河南省植烟土壤全钾总体含量适宜,平均为18.1±3.1 g·kg-1,变异不大,变异系数为16.84%。河南省8个主产烟县植烟土壤全钾含量高低顺序是:宜阳﹥卢氏﹥灵宝﹥襄城﹥颊县﹥泌阳﹥方城﹥邓州。河南省植烟土壤速效钾总体含量适宜,平均为158.39±64.78 mg·kg-1,存在一定程度的变异,变异系数为40.9%,有44.1%的土壤样品速效钾含量大于160.00 mg·kg-1。河南省主产烟县植烟土壤速效钾含量与土壤全钾含量有相似的趋势,以豫西卢氏、宜阳、灵宝最高,其中卢氏含量平均为201.15 mg·kg-1,有81.1%的土壤样品速效钾含量大于160.00 mg·kg-1;以豫南的泌阳、方城土壤速效钾含量较低,平均为100 mg·kg-1左右。
     (6)分析了河南烟区植烟土壤中量元素的分布状况。对河南省主产烟区3362个土壤样品中量元素进行化验分析,结果表明:①河南省植烟土壤钙含量总体偏高,平均为2219.34±1641.56 mg·kg-1,存在较大变异,变异系数为73.97%。河南省8个重点产烟县植烟土壤钙含量高低顺序是灵宝﹥宜阳﹥卢氏﹥郏县﹥襄城﹥邓州﹥方城﹥泌阳。②河南省植烟土壤镁含量总体适宜,平均为335.17±142.72mgl·kg-1,存在广泛的变异,变异系数为61.88%。河南省8个重点产烟县植烟土壤镁含量高低顺序是泌阳﹥邓州﹥方城﹥卢氏﹥灵宝﹥襄城﹥宜阳﹥郏县。③河南省植烟土壤硫含量比较丰富,平均为53.57±64.51 mg·kg-1,存在广泛的变异,变异系数为120.42%。有98.4%的土壤样品有效硫含量大于10 mg·kg-1,有34%的土壤样品有效硫含量大于50 mg·kg-1。河南省8个重点产烟县植烟土壤有效硫含量高低顺序是灵宝﹥郏县﹥卢氏﹥宜阳﹥方城﹥襄城﹥邓州﹥泌阳。
     (7)分析了河南烟区植烟土壤微量元素的分布状况。对河南省主产烟区3362个土壤样品微量元素进行化验分析,结果表明:①河南省植烟土壤有效硼含量偏低,平均为0.37±0.15 mg·kg-1,存在一定的变异,变异系数为39.94%,有64.8%的土壤样品有效硼含量小于0.4 mg·kg-1。河南省8个主产烟县植烟土壤有效硼含量高低顺序是灵宝﹥宜阳、襄城﹥方城、卢氏﹥郏县﹥邓州﹥泌阳。②河南省植烟土壤水溶性氯含量适宜,平均为42.25±37.32 mg·kg-1﹒存在广泛的变异,变异系数达88.34%。有87.5%的土壤样品水溶性氯含量满足优质烤烟生长。河南省8个主产烟县植烟土壤水溶性氯含量高低顺序是泌阳﹥卢氏﹥方城﹥灵宝﹥襄城﹥邓州﹥郏县﹥宜阳。土壤氯含量以宜阳最低,为18.64 mg·kg~(-1),以泌阳最高,卢氏次之,分别为61.76 mg·kg~(-1)和59.47 mg·kg~(-1)-1。因此这两个县在施肥是要控制含氯肥料的施用。③铁含量泌阳最高,为26.64 mg·kg~(-1),以灵宝最低,为2.33 mg·kg~(-1)。④锰含量以泌阳最高,为15.79 mg·kg~(-1),以襄城最低,为2.26 mg·kg~(-1),均在中等以上。⑤锌含量以方城最高,为1.46 mg·kg~(-1),以灵宝最低,为0.72 mg·kg~(-1),且属于偏低的范围。⑥钼含量以郏县最高,为40.39 ppb,以宜阳最低,为18.13 ppb。
     7、分析了烟叶化学成分与土壤营养元素的相互关系。采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法,通过对河南烟区烤烟392个烟叶样品和3362个土壤样品的测试分析,结果表明:烟叶总氮含量与土壤中速效氮含量关系显著,相关系数达到0.81,通过5%的显著性检验。土壤中速效氮含量每增加1个单位,烟叶中总氮含量将增加0.0014个单位。烟叶钾含量与土壤速效钾含量相关关系显著,相关系数为0.88,达到1%的极显著水平;烟叶中钾含量与土壤中全钾含量也有一定的相关关系,相关系数为0.61。在土壤中全钾含量保持不变的条件下,土壤中速效钾含量每增加1个单位,烟叶中钾的含量将增加0.0052个单位;在土壤中速效钾含量保持不变的条件下,土壤中全钾含量每增加1个单位,烟叶中钾含量增加0.487个单位。土壤有效氯含量是影响烟叶氯含量的重要因素,河南省部分烟区烟叶氯含量偏高的主要原因可能是土壤有效氯含量偏高和灌水氯含量偏高所致。
This study employed both field work and bench assay. It analyzed the chemical components of 392 sample leaves in 8 major tabocco counties, 3,362 soils sample in flue-cured tobacco field during five years, and the climate information within the past 30 years. The study systematically investigated the difference in comparative superiority of Henan tobacco, and the reason for the fluctuation in tobacco yield. It reviewed the tobacco variety in Henan province, studied the relationship between the climate and the chemical composition of tabocco leaves, and established the statistical model between them. We also recorded the abundance and deficiency of nutrients in the soils of tabocco fields, classified the soil nutrient grades, and found the correlation between the soil nutrients and leaf nutrients. Main conclusions are:
     1) The total production of flue-cured tobacco in Henan Province during the past 28 years. At present, the yield of flue-cured tobacco in Henan is still in the down trend, but the decreasing speed is getting slower. On the long term it can be expected that the new inflection point will appear in the coming 2-3 years, and the yield will be in the rising trend again. On the short term, the production is unstable and undulation is frequenct, fierce. In order to control the periodic undulation, and to promote the steady progress of tobacco production in Henan province, firstly, we should stablize the sown area s for tobacco and strengthen the protection fro those basic tobacco fields, especially the land ideal for tobacco growth. Next, we should emphasize the construction on the infrastruture and establish an insurance system for farmers from disaster, which will enhance the tobacco leaf production, resist natural disaster, and to guarantee tobacco farmers decent incomes even in bad years. Thirdly, the guiding function of the price signal should be fully used to direct the farmers to make the correct planning on the tobacco production and to help the stabilication of tobacco production. Fouthly, we should establish the "subsidy to land" policy and guide the farmers to implement the soil amelioration on their own initiative to actively increase organic fertilizer and to employ the green fertilizer, thus realize sustainable development of land.
     2) Scale comparative superiority, the efficiency comparative superiority and the overall comparative superiority in 12 tobacco leaf producting areas of Henan province were analyzed. Tobacco production comparative superiority of Luoyang, Sanmenxia, Xuchang, Luohe, Pingdingshan is outstanding. According to the essential factor reported bestows on the resources characteristic, and based on the utilization of the comparative superiority, we should fully take advantage of the growth potential of local flue-cured tobacco production, improve the production level of major tobacco areas, and use theat as the basic starting point and direction for Henan's tobacco industry. By comparing the scale comparative superiority, efficiency comparative superiority, and overall comparative superiority, it shows that the overall comparative superiority in Henan concentrates in Luoyang, Sanmexia, Xuchang, Luohe, Pingdingshan. Among them, Sanmenxia has the greatest overall comparative superiority, and Shangqiu, Zhoukou and Xinyang have an overall comparative superiority of less than 1 in each year, and have no advantage in the production of flue-cured tobacco. From a dynamic point of view, the overall comparative superiority of Sanmenxia is likely to be stronger. And those of Xuchang, Luohe, Pingdingshan will be weaker. Nanyang’s synthesis comparative superiority transformed from inferiority into superiority. Zhumadian’s synthesis comparative superiority transformed from superiority into inferiority.
     3) Chemical components in flue-cured tobacco leaf exists difference in different year. And it also exists difference in different positions. Mutation is also identical in different kinds of chemical components. Mutation in nicotine and the general nitrogen is less. It shows that they are effected less by natural and artificial effect. But, mutation in general sugar, potassium, chlorine are much higher, it explains that these components can through such as the cultivation, applying fertilizer, irrigation to change.
     4) Based on chemical components, we evaluated the flue-cured tobacco variety in Henan. Eight cultivars and six chemical components of tobacco which are planted in Henan are examed by using the DTOPSIS method. Comparison using the distance between the components of decision-making matrix R and the "ideal solution" and "negative ideal solution" shows that the Ci of K326 is the largest. This variety not only contains high concentration of potassium, but its other major features are very close to the "ideal solution", indicating it has good overall features. Besides K326, the results of other cultivars are: Yunyan 87 > RG17 > Yunyan 85 > CF965 >Zhongyan9203 > CF978 > NC89.
     5) Relations between tobacco leaf chemical components and climatic factor in different time in Henan Province had been analysed. The temperature, sunshine time, and precipitation of every ten days from April to September were studied for all the eight main tobacco counties during the past 35 years. And regression analysis was performed on climateic factors and tobacco chemical composition. The conclusions are as follows:
     a. During the seedling stage, temperature, light and rain water have no effect on nicotine, the total sugar accumulation, the nitrogen synthesis. The precipitation and the temperature have the certain inhibitory action on the chloride ion absorption by 0.003 unit and 0.0004 unit respectively. The precipitation and the sunshine also have inhibitory effect by the varying degree on the potassium ion absorption by 0.0001 unit and 0.0006 unit respectively.
     b. During the root growing stage , temperature have significant promoting effect on nicotine accumulation by 0.037 unit, also have some promoting effect on the total sugar accumulation by 0.162 unit. In this stage, these three meteorological factors-the temperature, light, and water have basically nothing to do with nitrogen accumulation. Sunshine hours has a negative correlation with the chloride ion absorption by 0.0006 unit.Temperature has significant inhibitory action on the potassium ion absorption by 0.025 unit.
     c. During prosperous growing stage, temperature has some promoting action on nicotine the accumulation by 0.02. unit The precipitation has some inhibitory effect on the synthesis of total sugar by 0.04. unit Meteorological factors as temperature, light, and water have no effect on the nitrogen absorption and accumulation. During the prosperous growing stage the increase of sunshine hours may suppress the chlorine absorption and accumulation by 0.0004 unit. Increase of the temperature and the sunshine hours has the more remarkable inhibitory action on the potassium ion absorption and the accumulation by 0.021 unit and 0.001 unit.
     d. During the mature period the precipitation and the sunshine hours have the remarkable inhibitory effect on nicotine accumulation by respectively 0.01 unit and 0.001 unit. But the temperature has some promoting effect on nicotine accumulation by 0.022. unit The meteorological factors do not have significant effect on the total sugar accumulation. During the mature period, climatic factors have some influence on the nitrogen compound absorption and the accumulation. The temperature can promote the synthesis of nitrogen compound by 0.014 unit. The precipitation and sunshine hours have the certain inhibitory action on the nitrogen absorption and the accumulation by 0.0003 unit and 0.0007 unit respectively. During the mature period, the temperature and the precipitation can in the certain degree suppress chloride ion absorption and accumulation by is 0.012 unit and 0.0002 unit respectively. During mature period, meteorological factor such as temperature, precipitation, and sunshine have the more obvious inhibitory action on potassium ion absorption and the accumulation by 0.025 unit, 0.0006 unit, 0.001 unit.
     6) Distribution of organic matter, pH, and the massive elements in Henan tobacco planting area soil had been analysed. Assay on 3,362 soil samples in Henan Province from main flue-cured tobacco areas show that:
     a. The mean value of soil organic matter content are greater than 15.0g·kg~(-1). It is smaller than the 15.0% standard and is far lower than Hunan 15.0 g·kg~(-1).The average is 13.3±3.2 g·kg~(-1) and variation is small. The coefficient of variation is 24.47%. Soil organic matter content of Xiangcheng is the highest in the eight major growing counties by 15.2 g·kg~(-1). But Fangcheng is the lowest by 11.3 g·kg~(-1). the order from high to low is the Lingbao, Xiangcheng, Jia county, Dengzhou, Yiyang, Biyang, Lushi, Fangcheng.
     b. Soil pH of Henan tobacco growing area is suitable overall. The average is 7.56±0.62, the amplitude is 5.4~9.35 and the variation is low. The coefficient of variation is 8.26%. Among them, soil with pH between 6~7, which is most suitable for flue-cured tobacco growing samples, accounts for 20.4%. Soil with pH between 6.0~8.0, which is suitable for flue-cured tobacco growing samples, accounts for 79.5%. If soil pH is higher than 9.0, it will affect the flue-cured tobacco growing. This kind of samples accounts for 1%. The order of soil pH of eight counties from high to low is Xiangcheng, Lingbao, Lushi, Yiyang, Fangcheng, Biyang, Jia county, and Dengzhou.
     c. Soil total nitrogen content in Henan Province is overall comparatively suitable, the mean is 0.84±0.16 g.kg~(-1) and the variation is small. The coefficient of variation is 19.31%. The order of soil total nitrogen content in 8 main growing counties from high to low is: Lingbao, Yiyang, Dengzhou, Xiangcheng, Lushi, Biyang, Jia county, Fangcheng. It is almost same as the order of organic content. Hydrolyzing nitrogen content in Henan province is overall comparatively suitable and the average is 57.68±21.03 mg.kg~(-1). The variation is small and the coefficientof variation is 36.47%. The order of soil hydrolyzing nitrogen content has the similar tendency in various production areas as the total nitrogen content order, which is Biyang, Jia county, Lingbao, Dengzhou, Fangcheng, Lushi, Xiangcheng, Yiyang.
     d. Soil total phosphorus content in Henan Province growing area is overall suitable, the average is 0.84±0.16 g.kg~(-1), variation is small, the coefficientof variation is 38.45%. The order of soil entire phosphorus content from eight main producing counties is Lingbao, Yiyang , Dengzhou, Lushi, Biyang, Jia county, Fangcheng, Xiangcheng. As a whole, soil fast-acting phosphorus total content in Henan Province is high, the average is 12.89±9.15 g.kg~(-1), it has some variation. The coefficient of variation is 9.15%. The order of soil fast-acting phosphorus content from eight main producing counties is Biyang, Dengzhou, Yiyang, Lingbao, Lushi, Jia county, Fangcheng, Xiangcheng.
     e. Soil total potassium overall content in Henan Province is suitable, the average is 18.1±3.1 g.kg~(-1), the variation is small, the coefficient of variation is 16.84%. The order of soil total potassium content from eight main producing counties is Yiyang,Lushi ,Lingbao, Xiangcheng , Jia county, Biyang, Fangcheng, Dengzhou. Soil fast-acting potassium overall content in Henan Province is suitable, the average is 158.39±64.78 mg.kg~(-1). It has a some degree of variation, the coefficient of variation is 40.9%.About 44.1% soil fast-acting potassium content is greater than 160.00 mg.kg~(-1). The order of fast-acting potassium content from eight main producing counties has the similar tendency as total potassium by Lushi, Yiyang, Lingbao being the highest, Lushi’s content is 201.15 mg.kg~(-1). 81.1% of its soil fast-acting potassium content are greater than 160.00 mg.kg~(-1). Biyang, Fangcheng soil fast-acting potassium content is lower, average is about 100 mg.kg~(-1).
     f. The distribution of medium quantity element of flue-cured tobacco soil in Henan province had been analysed. The soil calcium content, magnesium content, and effective sulfur of 3,362 soils samples in Henan Province had been analyzed. The results indicate that :The soil calcium content in Henan Province is high overall, the average is 2219.34±1641.56 mg.kg~(-1), the variation is in certain degree, the coefficientof variation is 73.97%. The order of soil calcium content from eight main producing counties is Lingbao, Yiyang, Lushi, Jia county, Xiangcheng, Dengzhou, Fangcheng, Biyang. The soil magnesium content in Henan Province is overall suitable, the average is 335.17±142.72mg.kg~(-1), but it has a widespread variation however. The coefficient of variation is 61.88%. The order of magnesium content from the eight counties is Biyang, Dengzhou, Fangcheng, Lushi, Lingbao, Xiangcheng,Yiyang, Jia county. The soil sulfur in Henan Province is quite rich. The average is 53.57±64.51 mg.kg~(-1). It exhibits a widespread variation. The coefficient of variation is 120.42%. About 98.4% soils sample has an effective sulfur of more than 10 mg.kg~(-1), about 34% soil samples' effective sulfur of higher than 50 mg.kg~(-1). The order of soil magnesium content is Lingbao, Jia county, Lushi, Yiyang, Fangcheng, Xiangcheng, Dengzhou, Biyang.
     g. The distribution of soil trace element of flue-cured tobacco growing soil in Henan province had been analysed. Results from 3,362 soils samples suggest that: The trace elements content are not high in growing plant, and are also low in the soil, but they are indispensable to a growing plant. Lack of those elements can affect tobacco growth. Taking chlorine as an example, if the content in the tobacco leaf surpasses 1%, it can cause the tobacco leaf to burn power to drop. The soil effective boron content in Henan Province is somewhat low. The average is 0.37±0.15 mg.kg~(-1). It has a certain variation. The coefficient of variation is 39.94%. About 64.8% soils sample effective boron content is lower than 0.4 mg.kg~(-1). The order of soil effective boron content from eight main producing counties is Lingbao,Yiyang, Xiangcheng, Fangcheng, Lushi, Jia county, Dengzhou, Biyang. The soil soluble chlorinity in Henan Province is not suitable. The average is 42.25±37.32 mg.kg~(-1). It has large variation which amounts to 88.34%. About 87.5% soils sample's water-soluble chlorinity can satisfy the growth of high quality flue-cured tobacco. The orde of soluble chlorinity from eight main producing counties is Biyang, Lushi, Fangcheng, Lingbao, Xiangcheng, Dengzhou, Jia county, Yiyang. Soil chlorinity in Yiyang is the lowest by 18.64 mg.kg~(-1). The highest is Biyang by 61.76 mg.kg~(-1). Lushi is next to Biyang by 59.47 mg.kg~(-1). Therefore these two counties must reduce the use of low or none chlorine fertilizer . The highest Fe content is in Biyang by 26.64 mg.kg~(-1), Lingbao is the lowest by 2.33 mg.kg~(-1). Biyang has the highest Manganese content by 15.79 mg.kg~(-1), but Xiangcheng is the lowest by 2.26 mg.kg~(-1). Fangcheng’s Zinc content is the highest by 1.46 mg.kg~(-1). Lingbaoto is the lowest by 0.72 mg.kg~(-1), both of them belong to the low scale. Molybdenum content in Jia county is the highest by 40.39 ppb. Yiyang is the lowest by 18.13 ppb.
     7) Relationship between chemical components in flue-cured tobacco leaf and soil chemical element was analyzed. Field investigation and bench assays were employed. Nitrogen, potassium, and chlorine content in soil samples of 3,362 soils samples and 392 flue-cured tobacco leaf samples were analyzed. The results demonstrate that: fast-acting nitrogens between tobacco and soil have significant correlation, bu thte relation on potassium and chlorine content between soil and leaf is not significant. The leaf nitrogen content and the soil fast-acting nitrogen content are correlated with a coefficient 0.81 at 5% significant level. the other two tayes of nitrogen contents are not correlated. For each increase of 1 unit on fast-acting nitrogen content in soil, the total nitrogen content in the leaf increases 0.14‰. The tobacco leaf potassium content and the soil total potassium content also have some correlation with a coefficient of 0.61. Under the constant content of total fast-acting potassium, every increase of 1 unit on the total potassium will generate 0.52‰increase on potassium content in the leaf. Keeping the potassium content constant, 1% increase of soil total potassium content will generate 0.49% increase of potassium content in the leaf. The available chlorine content in soil is an important factor on leaf chlorinity. The reason that the chlorinity in flue-cured tobacco leaf in some areas of Henan is a little high possibly is that their soil available chlorine content is high, and that the water chlorinity content is high.
引文
Anderson, P. J. et al. The relation of magnesia to the burning quality of cigar leaf tobacco[J]. Conn. State Sta. Bull, 1931, 326: 391~398.
    Burton H R, Dye N K, Bush L P. Distribution of tobacco constituents in tobacco leaf tissue (1) Tobacco specific Nitrosamines, nitrate, and alkaloids[J]. J Agric Food chem, 1992, (40): 1050 ~1055.
    Campbell, C. A. B. G. Mc Conkey, R. P. Zestier, F. Selves, and D. Curtin. Long term effects of tillage and crop rotations on soil organics and total N in a clay soil in southwestern Saskatchewan[J]. Canadian J. Soil Sci. 1996(76): 395~407.
    Chitralekha Chatterjee,Nirmala Nautiyal.1994.Infuence of changes in manganese and magnesium supply on some spects of wheat Physiology. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr,40(2)191~197
    Choutezu, J. and D. Fauconnier. Fertilizing for high quality and yield tobacco[M]. International Potash Institute, WorblaufenBern / Switzerland, 1988.
    Dick R. P, Break will D., Turco R. Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrating biological indicators. In: Doran J. W. and Jones A. J. Editors, Handbook of Methods for Assessment of soil quality ,SSSA , Madison USA , 1996b : 247~272.
    Dick R. P. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In: Doran J. W., Coleman D. C., Bezdicek D.F. and Stewart B.A, Editors, Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, SSSA, Madison, 1994a, 107~124.
    Dom inick Salvatore.朱宝宪,吴洪译.国际经济学[M ].北京:清华大学出版社, 1998.
    Doran, J. W., M. Sarrantonio, and M. A Liebig. Soil health and sustainability[J]. Adv. Argon. 1996, (56): 1~54.
    Doran JW, Parkin TB. Defining and assessing soil quality[M], In: Doran JW eds. Defining Soil Quality for A Sustainable Environment. SSSA Spec. Publ. 1994.
    Edward CJ, Laura LL. A soil quality index and its relationship to efficiency and productivity growth measures: Two decompositions[J]. Amer J A gric Ecol , 1999, 81: 881~893.
    FAO. A frame work for land evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin, 32. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1976.
    Francisco, O. C. Cavetto, S, Sanchez-Corte’s, V. Tangle. L, Sitti, and C. Gesso. Spectroscopic characterization of soil organic matter in long-term amendment traits[J]. Soil Sci. 2000, (165): 495 ~504.
    Greer, K. J., D. W. Anderson, and J. J. Schooners. Soil erosion organic matter decline and soil quality indicators. In Proc. of Soil Quality Assessment for the Prairies Work shop, G.M. Coven and H.S.Vanderpluym(eds), Edmonton, Alberta, 1996. 21~33.
    Jordan D. Kremer R. J. Berg field W. A., et al. Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical agriculture fields[J]. Boil Fertile Soils, 1995, 19 (4):297~302.
    Karlen D. L. Gardener J. C., Rosek M. J. A soil quality frame work for evaluating the impact of CRP[J]. J Product Agric, 1998, 11(1): 56~60.
    Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, et al. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation(a guest editorial) [J]. J Soil Six Soc Aimer, 1997, 61: 4~10.
    Lal, K. N. and R. s. Tyagi, Deficiency, favorable and toxic effect of boron on tobacco[J]. Am. J. Bot, 1949, 36: 676~680.
    Larson W. E., F. J. Pierce. in: Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin USA, 1994, 37~52.
    Marshner. HU. Mechanisms of manganese acquisition by roots from soils in soil and plants[M]. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, 191~204.
    Merker J. Studies on the effects of fertilization with phosphates upon development yield and quality of tobacco[J]. Inst. Tanbark. Dresden, 1996, (1): 40~45.
    Pal U.R., D. R. Gosset, J. L. Sims, and J. E. leggett. Molybdenum and sulfur nutrition effects on nitrate reduction in burley tobacco[J]. Can J. Bot, 1976, (54): 201~202.
    Pennock DJ, Anderson DW, et al. Landscape scale changes in indicators of soil quality due to cultivation in Saskatchewan[J]. Can. Geoderma, 1994, 64: 1~19.
    Pieri C, Dumanski J, Hamblin A. World Bank Discussion Papers No. 315: Land Quality indicators[J]. The World Bank, Washington. D. C. 1995.
    Roming DE, Garlynd MJ, Harris RF, et al. How farmers assess soil health and quality[J]. J Soil Water Conser, 1995, 50: 229~236.
    R .P.Narwal, Vinod Kumar,J.P.Singh.1985.Potassium and magnesium relationship in cowpea. Plant and 5011,86:129~134.
    Sims J T, Cunningham SD. Sumner ME. Assessing soil quality for environmental purposes: Roles and challenges for soil scientists[J]. J Environ Qual, 1997, 11: 29~30.
    Smith J. L., et al. in: Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin USA, 1994, 149~157.
    Sojka RE, Upchurch DR. Reservations regarding the soil quality concept[J]. J Soil Sci Soc Amer, 1999, 63: 1039~1054.
    Staben ML, Bezdicek DF, Smith JL, et al. Assessment of soil quality in conservation reserve program and wheat-fallow soils[J]. J Soil Sci Soc Amer, 1997, 61:124~130.
    Stenberg B. Monitoring soil quality of arable land: Micro biological indicators[J], Acta Agric Scand Section B. Soil and Plant Sci, 1999, 49: 1~24.
    Tso. TC, Mcmurtrey JR, Sorokin T. Mineral deficiency and organic constituents in tobacco plants. alkaloids, sugars, and organic acids[J]. Plant Physiology, 1960, (35): 60~64.
    Wander, M.M., and X. Yang. Influence of tillage on the dynamics of loose and occluded particulate and homicide organic matter fractions [J]. Soil Boil .Biochemist. 2000, (32): 1151~1160.
    Warkentin BP. The changing concept of soil quality[J]. J Soil Water Censer, 1995, 50: 226~228.
    Whitty, E.B., C.B. McCants and L. Shaw. Influence of width of fertilized band of soil on response of burley tobacco to nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Tobacco Sci. 1966, 10: 17~22.
    Yoshida D. Relation between the behavior of nitrogen and the nicotine synthesis in tobacco plants[J]. Soil Sci Plant Nutria, 1961, (7): 157~164.
    艾绥龙.陕西烟区土壤特性及其与烟叶品质的关系[J].西北农业学报, 1998, (2): 75~77.
    鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000. 25~38.
    白永富,卢秀萍.烤烟区试品种的灰色关联度评价[J].云南农业大学学报,2006, 21(6): 761~764.
    毕淑峰,朱显灵.云南烤烟化学成分与香气品质的关系研究[J].中国农学通报, 2004,20(6):67~68,2004
    曹承绵,严长生,张志明,等.关于土壤肥力数值化综合评价的探讨[J].土壤通报, 1983, (4): 13~15.
    曹鹏云,鲁世军,张务水.植烟土壤有机质含量与有机肥施用概况[J].中国烟草学报, 2004, 10(6): 40~42.
    曹志洪,凌云霄,李仲林,等.烤烟营养及失调症状图谱[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社, 1993, 20~21.
    曹志洪.解译土壤质量演变规律,确保土壤资源持续利用[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2001, 23 (3) :28~32.
    曹志洪.优质烤烟生产的土壤与施肥[M].江苏:江苏科学技术出版社, 1991.
    曹志洪.我国烟叶钾含量及其与植烟土壤环境条件的关系中国烟草,1 991,(3):6~13.
    查录云,郑劲民,张仁义,等.微量元素锰对烤烟质量影响的研究[J].烟草科技, 1994, (6): 29~31.
    常青,殷中意,李宏,等.重庆市郊土壤中锌的调查分析[J].重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 21(3): 226~228.
    陈武.比较优势与中国农业经济国际化[M ].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 1997.
    陈贵军,张水成,许自成,等.土壤肥力对烤烟叶片硝酸盐积累的影响[J].中国农学通报,2005, 21(8): 200~203.
    陈建军.根际pH值与烤烟叶片化学成分关系的研究[J].中国烟草, 1996, (3): 31~33.
    陈建忠.山地黄壤烤烟中微肥施用试验研究[J].烟草科技, 2000, (9): 39~41.
    陈江华,刘建利,龙怀玉.中国烟叶矿质营养及主要化学成分含量特征研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2004, l0(3): 14~l8.
    陈明致.东北商品粮基地的水利建设需要加强[J].东北水利水电, 1996, (1) : 3~6.
    陈瑞泰.中国烟草栽培学[M].上海:上海科技出版社, l989, 87~89.
    陈顺辉,李文卿,江荣风,等.施氮量对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].中国烟草学报, 2003, (增刊): 37~40.
    陈溪明,周道金.闽西优质烟生产土壤管理的探讨[J].福建热作科技, 2001, 26(2): 41~43.
    程林仙.渭北早作区干早对烤烟产爱和品质的影响及孤盖抗早栽培技术田[J].中国农业气象,1996,17(2): l8~21.
    程叶青,何秀丽.东北地区粮食生产的结构变动及比较优势分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,(3): 1~7.
    崔国明,黄必志,柴家荣,等.硼对烤烟生理生化及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2000, 21(3): 14~18.
    崔国明,张小海,李永平,等.镁对烤烟生理生化及品质和产量的影响研究[J].中国烟草科学, 1998, (1): 5~7.
    邓留献.农用土地定级估价理论与实践[M].北京:中国大地出版社, 2000.
    丁进宝,程永平.土壤环境质量评价中的宽域灰色聚类法[J].农业环境保护, 1993, 12(4): 187~190.
    丁进宝,周耀文.等斜率灰色聚类法与化工区土壤环境质量评价[J].化工环保, 1993, 13(1): 45~49.
    董国政,刘德辉,姜月华,等.湖州市土壤微量元素含量与有效性评价[J].土壤通报, 2004, 35(4): 475~478.
    董文泉、高铁梅等.经济周期波动的分析与预测方法[M].吉林:吉林大学出版社,1998
    窦逢科,张景略.烟草品质与土壤肥料[M].河南科学技术出版社, 1989.
    窦逢科.烟草品质与土壤肥料[M].郑州:郑州科学技术出版社, 1992.
    杜昌文,王运华,徐芳森,等.不同硼效率甘蓝型油菜品种中硼的形态及其相互关系.植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(l): 105~109.
    杜咏梅,郭承芳.水溶性糖,烟碱,总氮含量与烤烟吃味品质的关系研究.中国烟草科学,2000,21(1):7~10
    范艺宽,张翔,李富欣,等.河南省烟区土壤磷素资源状况与动态变化研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2003, (3): 14~15.
    方先兰,肖林长,郭伟.品种和施氮量对烤烟优质高产的效应初探[J].江西农业科技, 2003, (11): 18~19.
    方兆登,张益农.湖北嘉兴平原几种稻田土壤肥力的评估[J].土壤, 1990, 22(1): 12~16.
    傅泽强,蔡运龙,杨友孝,等.中国粮食安全与耕地资源变化的相关分析.自然资源学报, 2001, (4): 313~318.
    高家合,秦西云.烟叶主要化学成分对评吸质量的影响.山地农业生物学报,2004,23(6): 497~501
    高旺盛.中国区域农业协调发展战略.北京:中国农业出版社,2004, 33~34.
    关博谦,石孝均,霍沁建,等.重庆市烟区土壤-烤烟氯素含量及其变化研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1): 89~92.
    郭淑敏,马帅,陈印军.中国粮食主产区主要粮食作物比较优势与发展对策研究[J].中国农学通报第,2006(1): 391~396.
    郭月清,廖晓海,杨同升,等.烟草产量品质与气候因素的统计分析,中国烟草,1983(1):1~6
    国家统计局.新中国50年统计资料汇编[M].北京中国统计出版社,1997
    国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 1998~2006
    韩锦峰.烟草栽培生理[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1996. 54~61.
    何永良.贵州烤烟施氯量的初步研究[J].中国烟草, 1987, (4): 24~291.
    侯庆山,张玉东.镁锌硼肥在烤烟生产中应用效果的研究[J].土壤, 1997, 29(3): 149~151.
    侯彦林.“生态平衡施肥”的理论基础和技术体系.生态学报, 2000, 20(4): 653~658.
    胡国松,郑伟,王震东,等.烤烟营养原理[M].北京:科学出版社, 2000.
    胡佩,周顺桂,刘德辉.土壤磷素分级方法研究评述[J].土壤通报, 2003, 34(3): 229~232.
    黄燕翔,刘淑欣,熊德中,等.福建烟区土壤条件与烤烟品质的关系[J].福建农业大学学报, 1995, 24(2): 201~204.
    黄元炯,傅瑜,董志坚,等.河南烟叶营养元素和还原糖、烟碱含量及其与评吸质量的相关性[J].中国烟草科学, 1999, (1): 3~7.
    黄元炯,张翔,范艺宽,等.河南烟区土壤硫、镁及微量元素的含量与分布[J].烟草科技, 2005, 3: 33~37.
    霍沁建,石孝均,关博谦.重庆植烟土壤氯素含量[J],西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 26(4): 494~497.
    江苏农学院.植物生理学[M].北京:农业出版社, 998, 115~142.
    姜超英,周忠仁,黄全康,等.不同生态条件下的烤烟硼营养研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2004, (3): 20~24.
    金立新,唐金荣,刘爱华,等.成都地区土壤硼元素含量及其养分管理建议[J].第四纪研究,2005, 25(3): 364~370.
    金闻博.烟草化学[M].北京:清华大学出版社. 1994.
    阚文杰,吴启堂.一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J].土壤通报, 1994, 25(6): 245~247.
    雷永和,邵岩,晋艳,等.烟叶含钾量与土壤养分的关系[J].中国烟草科学, 1994, (2): 3~6.
    黎成厚,刘元生,何腾兵.土壤质地等对烤烟生长及钾素营养的影响[J].山地农业生物学报, 1999, 18(4) : 203~208.
    黎孟波,张先婉.土壤肥沃度理化评价:土壤肥力研究之三[A].见:张先婉主编.土壤肥力研究进展[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1991, 221~234.
    黎妍妍,许自成,肖汉乾,等.湖南桂阳烟区土壤养分状况的综合评价[J].西南农业学报, 2007, 20(1): 72~76.
    李崇光,郭犹焕.中国农产品比较优势研究[D ].武汉:华中农业大学研究生院, 1998.
    李汉英,陈旺锦.广西、云南、贵州区域农业比较优势[R].北京:中国农业科学院区划所, 1996.
    李明德,肖汉乾,余崇祥,等.湖南烟区土壤中、微量元素状况及施肥效应研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2005, (1): 25~27.
    李念胜.土壤pH值与烤烟质量[J].中国烟草, 1986, (2): 12~14.
    李卫东.烟叶品质与气象要素关系的研究[J].河南农业科学,1990(12):9~11.
    李琦.烤烟优劣质年的气候条件分析[J].安徽农业科学,1997,25(2):127~130.
    李应中.比较优势原理及其在农业上的应用[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2003, 24 (2) : 5~9.
    李永忠,蒋志宏,杨志新,等.供Mg水平对烤烟主要经济性状的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 2002, 24(3): 200~203.
    李永忠,罗鹏涛.氯在烟草体内的生理代谢功能及其应用[J].云南农业大学学报, 1995, (10): 57~61.
    李酉开.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社. 1983
    历昌坤,周显升.烤烟烟叶焦油释放量与部分化学成分的关系研究[J].中国烟草科学,2004,25(2):25~27
    梁颁捷,林毅,朱其清,等.福建植烟土壤pH值与土壤有效养分的相关性[J].中国烟草科学, 2001, (1): 25~27.
    刘斌,吴其祥,朱树标,等.广西土壤钼的含量及其影响因素[J]. 1996, 3: 132~135.
    刘崇洪.几种土壤质量评价方法的比较[J].干旱环境监测. 1996, 10(1): 26~29.
    刘崇群.硫酸工业硫肥的重要性和我国对硫肥的需求趋势[J].硫酸工业, 1995, (5) :20~23.
    刘国顺.国内外烟叶质量差距分析和提高烟叶质量技术途径探讨[J].中国烟草学报, 2003(增刊): 54~58.
    刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社. 2003.
    刘洪斌,毛知耘.烤烟的氯索营养与含氯钾肥的施用[J].西南农业学报, 1997, 10(1): 100~l07.
    刘勤,曹志洪.烟草硫素营养与品质研究进展[J].土壤, 1998, 6: 320~323.
    刘勤,张新,赖辉比,等.土壤烤烟系统硫素营养研究.Ⅰ.土壤硫素营养状况及对烤烟生长发育的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2000, (4): 20~22.
    刘淑欣,曹鸿棋,熊德中,等.土壤性质与烤烟总糖、烟碱关系的研究[J].福建农业科技, 1994, (6): 14~16.
    刘晓冰,邢宝山.土壤质量及其评价指标[J].农业系统科学与系统研究, 2002, 18(2): 109~111.
    刘兴土,佟连军,武志杰,等.东北地区粮食生产潜力的分析与预测[J].地理科学, 1998, 18 (6) : 501~509.
    刘子江,武冠云,程遥,等.施用镁、硼及硝基腐植酸对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].磷肥与复肥, 1994, 9(3): 81~82, 80.
    卢布,陈印军,吴凯.我国中长期粮食单产潜力的分析预测.中国农业资源与区划, 2005, (2): 1~5.
    鲁奇,吕鸣伦.五十年代以来我国粮食生产地域格局变化趋势及其原因初探[J].地理科学进展, 1997, 16 (1) : 31~36.
    陆力光,杨正申.黄腐酸在旱地烤烟上的应用研究[J].中国烟草, 1994, (4): 12~20.
    吕晓男,陆允甫,王人朝.土壤肥力综合评价初步研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 1999, 25(4): 378~382.
    吕晓男,王人潮.土壤肥力综合评价初步研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 1999, 25(4): 378~3820.
    罗建新,石丽红,龙世平.湖南主产烟区土壤养分状况与评价[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2005, 31(4): 376~380.
    骆伯胜,钟继洪,陈俊坚.土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究[J].土壤, 2004, 36(1): 104~106.
    骆东奇,白洁,谢德体.论土壤肥力评价指标和方法[J].土壤与环境, 2002, 11(2): 202~205.
    马鹏飞,田长彦,卞卫国,等.克拉玛依农业开发区土壤质量评价指标的筛选[J].干旱区研究,2004, 21(2): 166~170.
    马强,宇万太,赵少华,等.黑土农田土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10): 1916~1920.
    马文广,李永平,王晓云,等.烤烟品种(系)经济性状与环境互作适应性分析[ J ].云南农业大学学报, 2003, 18 (3) : 58 ~ 63.
    毛知耘,李家康,何光安,等.中国含氯化肥[M ].北京:中国农业出版社, 2001. 46~47.
    莫治雄.对应分析在土壤肥力研究中的应用[J].土壤肥料, 1993, 3(4): 4~7.
    聂新柏,靳志丽.烤烟中微量元素对烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2003, (4): 30~34.
    潘文杰,姜超英.烟草硼素营养研究进展,贵州农业科学, 2003, 31(1): 56~57.
    秦松,闫献芳,冯勇刚.贵州植烟土壤有机质与氮素特征研究[J].土壤, 2004, 36(4): 416~419.
    秦松.贵州植烟土壤氯素特征与含氯钾肥施用探讨[J].西南农业学报, 2001, (5): 471~473.
    邵岩.镁在烟草生产中的作用[J].云南农业大学学报, 1992, 7(2): 105~108.
    沈宏,徐志红,曹志红.用土壤生物和养分指标表征土壤肥力的可持续性[J].土壤与环境, 1998, 8(1): 31~35.
    史宏志,刘国顺.烟草香味学[M].北京:中国农业出版社. 1998.
    舒冬妮.用模糊数学综合评判土壤中重金属污染程度的探评[J].农业环境保护, 1989, 8(5): 30~32.
    宋承鉴,宋月家,周恩肖.广西植烟土壤特征分析[J].中国烟草, 1994, (2): 5~9.
    孙波,张桃林,赵其国.我国东南丘陵山区土壤肥力的综合评价[J].土壤通报, 1995, 32(4): 362~369.
    孙焕等.灰色关联分析法在烤烟品种综合评估中的应用[J].河南农业科学,2007 (2):38~40.
    孙逊.冀东.高肥力土壤上氮磷钾配合施用对晒烟产量质量及二者关系的影响[J].中国烟草, 1994, (1): 8~12.
    唐华俊.中国土地资源及其农业利用.北京:气候出版社,2004.1~4.
    唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及计算机处理平台[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1997.
    唐瑞宝,荆志成,余崇祥.不同微量元素配施对烟草产量和品质的影响[J].湖南农业科学, 1994, (2): 30~31.
    唐晓平.四川紫色土肥力的Fuzzy综合评价[J].土壤通报, 1997, 28(3): 107~109.
    唐远驹,张建平.上海主要烤烟生产基地质量生态类型的初步划分[J].中国烟草科学2006,(3): 1~5.
    陶晓秋,夏林,黄玫.四川省植烟土壤有效态微量元素含量评价及施肥探讨[J].烟草科技, 2003, (11): 43~45.
    陶晓秋.四川西南烟区土壤有效态微量元素含量评价[J],土壤, 2004, 36(4): 438~441.
    田光明.县域农业资源环境可持续性评价的理论与方法探讨[D].北京:北京农业大学博士学位论文, 1995[19].
    万良碧,刘志刚.鄱阳湖区农田环境质量评价方法研究[J].农业环境保护, 1989, 8(2): 25~28.
    汪洪,褚天铎.植物镁素的研究进展[J].植物学通报, 1999, 16(3): 245~250.
    王德宣,富德义.吉林省西部地区土壤微量元素有效性评价[J],土壤, 2002, (2): 86~90.
    王金生.灰色聚类法在土壤污染综合评价的应用[J].农业环境保护, 1991, 10(2):169~172.
    王林,卢秀萍,肖汉乾,等.浏阳植烟土壤肥力状况的综合评价[J].河南农业大学学报, 2006, 40(6): 597~601.
    王令超.基于GIS工作平台的农用土地定级方法研究[J].地域研究与开发, 1999, 18(2): 20~22.
    王鹏,李丽杰,李江力,等.烤烟磷素营养状况与施用技术研究[J].土壤肥料, 1999, (4): 30~32.
    王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.
    王伟杰,柯涌潮. T值分级法在环境评价中的应用[J].农业环境保护, 1986, 5(2): 16~18.
    王欣,许自成,肖汉乾.湖南烟区烤烟钾含量与土壤钾素的分布特点之间的关系,安全与环境学报,2007,7(5):83-87
    王玉杰,王千.主要土壤肥力因素指标的筛选模型[J].生物数学学报, 2000, 15(2): 163~168.
    王玉玺,栗坷.陕西烤烟质量与气候因子关系的研究[J].陕西气候,2001(4): 20~23.
    王元英,冯全福.烤烟品种产量、质量稳定性分析[J].中国烟草,1990 (1) : 14 ~ 19.
    韦成才,马英明,艾绥龙,等.陕南烤烟质量与气候关系研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2004,( 3) : 38~41.
    温永琴,徐丽芬,陈宗瑜,等.云南烤烟石油醚提取物和多酚类与气候要素的关系[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 28(4): 103~105.
    吴正举,刘淑欣,熊德中.福建烟区土壤特性及其与烟叶品质的关系[J].中国烟草学报.1996, 63(1): 49~54..
    吴正举.福建烟区土壤特性及其与烟叶品质的关系[J].中国烟草学报, 1996, (1): 49~53.
    伍贤进.土壤水分对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].农业与技术, 1998, 18(2): 3~6.
    武志杰,晁岳侠,曾丽娟,等.东北大平原商品粮基地的农业资源开发对策[J].资源开发与市场, 1996, 12 (6) : 256- 257.
    肖厚军.贵州主要耕地上壤硫素状况及硫肥效应研究[D].西南农业大学, 2003, 10~13.
    肖吉中,江锡瑜,黄立栋,等.烤烟叶片重量与质量关系的初步研究[J].烟草科技, 1995, (2): 30~32.
    肖金香,刘正和,王燕,等.气候生态因素对烤烟产量与品质影响及植烟措施研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2004, 11( 4) : 158~160
    肖协忠.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1997.
    熊德中,刘淑欣,曾文龙.福建烟区土壤条件与烤烟品质的关系[J].土壤通报, 1995, 26(3): 117~119.
    熊东红,贺秀斌,周红艺.土壤质量评价研究进展[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2005, 27(1): 71~75.
    许皋,杜孟庸,周健学,等.判别分析在潮土肥力评价中的应用[A].见:张先婉主编.土壤肥力研究进展[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1991, 242~246.
    许自成,陈伟,肖汉乾,等.烤烟硝酸盐含量与土壤养分的关系[J].生态学报, 2006b, 26(6): 1889~1895.
    许自成,刘国顺,刘金海,等.铜山烟区生态因素和烟叶质量特点[J].生态学报, 2005b, 25(7): 1748~1753.
    许自成,王林,王金平,等.湖南烤烟化学成分与土壤有机质含量的关系分析[J].生态学杂志, 2006a, 25(10): 1186~1190.
    许自成,王林,肖汉乾.湖南烟区烤烟锌含量与土壤有效锌的分布特点及关系分析[J].生态环境, 2007a, 16(1): 180~185.
    许自成,张莉,肖汉乾,等.烤烟硝酸盐、亚硝酸盐含量与若干品质指标的典型相关分析[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2005a, 20(1): 43~46.
    许自成,陈伟,肖汉乾,等.烤烟硝酸盐含量与土壤养分的关系分析,生态学报,2006c,26(6):1889~1895
    许自成,黎妍妍,肖汉乾,等.湖南烤烟营养元素含量与总糖和烟碱的关系,西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008a,36(1):137~142,148
    许自成,黎妍妍,肖汉乾,等.湖南烟区土壤交换性钙、镁含量及对烤烟品质的影响,生态学报,2007b,27(11):4425~4433
    许自成,黎妍妍,肖汉乾,等.湘南烟区生态因素与烤烟质量的综合评价,植物生态学报,2008b,32(1):226~234
    许自成,刘春奎,毕庆文,等.中国主产烟区烤烟硫含量的分布特点及与其他化学成分的相关分析,郑州轻工业学院学报,2008c,23(1):1~5,10
    许自成,王林,肖汉乾,等.湖南烟区烤烟(Nicotinan tobacum L.)硼含量与土壤有效硼含量的关系,生态学报,2007c,27(6):2309~2317
    许自成,王林,肖汉乾,等.湖南烟区烤烟硫含量与土壤有效硫含量的分布特点,应用生态学报,2007d,18(11):2507~2511
    许自成,王林,肖汉乾.湖南烟区烤烟锌含量与土壤有效锌的分布特点及关系分析,生态环境,2007e,16(1):180~185
    许自成,肖汉乾,赵献章,等.植烟土壤养分丰缺状况评价的统计学方法,土壤通报,2004,35(5):558~561.
    许自成,张婷,卢秀萍,等.打顶后施用生长素和钾肥对烤烟根系性状及品质的影响,中国烟草学报,2008d,14(2):26~30
    许自成,张婷,卢秀萍,等.打顶后施用生长素和钾肥对烤烟碳氮代谢的影响,生态学杂志,2007f,26(4):461~465
    闫百兴,宋新山,闫敏华.东北地区粮食生产及其可持续性因子分析[J].资源开发与市场, 2000, 16 (6) , 343~377.
    严昶升.土壤肥力研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1988.
    杨德廉,王树声.烟草中氨基酸变化规律及其与烟叶品质关系研究进展[J].中国烟草科学, 1998, 19 (3): 11~13.
    杨焕文,李永忠,刘彦中,等.烟草特有的N-亚硝胺形成、积累及其影响因素[J].烟草科技, 1998, (4): 31~331.
    杨瑞吉,杨祁峰,牛俊义.表征土壤肥力主要指标的研究进展[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 2004, (1): 86~91.
    杨尚英.烤烟生产气候生态因子的定量分析[J].安徽农业科学,2005,(8):1449~1450
    杨恕良,黄肇玉.贵州省优质烤烟的气候因素及其区域划分,中国烟草,1983,(2)11~13
    叶兴庆.对我国农业政策调整的几点思考,农业经济问题[J]. 2005,(1):21~ 24.
    尹昌斌,陈印军,毕于运.红黄壤地区粮食生产的区域比较优势测度.农业技术经济, 1998, (5): 251~254.
    于川芳,李晓红.玉溪烤烟外观质量因素与其主要化学成分之间的关系.烟草科技,2005(1): 5-7
    余存祖,刘耀宗,彭琳,等.黄土区土壤肥力形成过程与肥力指标分析[J].土壤通报, 1990, 21(5): 197~201.
    祝美群,白人朴.改革开放以来我国粮食生产波动分析[J].中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5 (4) : 6~10.
    左天觉著,朱尊权译.烟草的生产、生理和生物化学[M].上海:远东出版社, 1993, 1~313.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700