用户名: 密码: 验证码:
查干凹陷下白垩统层序地层及油气成藏特征研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文立足于查干凹陷勘探实践,从构造研究出发,运用层序地层学理论对研究区进行层序地层的划分,在层序格架范围内对沉积相和火山岩相进行研究,最后运用成藏理论对成藏特征进行研究,分析成藏的主控因素。
     通过对全区地震数据进行精细构造解释,认为查干凹陷出现了伸展、反转、走滑和复合多种构造组合样式。根据沉积补偿原理提出地层厚度系数研究构造运动的方法,利用沉积厚度法对构造活动进行研究,显示出查干凹陷苏一至苏二段沉积时期明显存在一个北西—南东向的“跷跷板”构造运动,在此认识之上运用平衡剖面法研究其构造演化,中生代白垩纪以来经历了裂陷阶段、断坳转换阶段、坳陷阶段和反转阶段。
     运用层序地层学理论和岩芯、测井地震等资料,进行层序地层划分并建立了查干凹陷下白垩统层序地层格架和层序发育模式。整个下白垩统为一个二级构造层序,进一步划分为6个层序16个体系域。利用断面沟扇体系及基底形态、地震反射结构、粘土矿物组合、岩屑类型、重矿物组合明确古流向和物源。查干西次凹主要物源来自于南北两个轴向物源,次要物源来自于西尼凸起和“毛敦次凸”;东次凹物源来自于东部狼山。
     在层序格架建立和物源研究的基础上,以体系域为单元研究了沉积相展布及演化规律。从早到晚,巴音戈壁组成了由近岸水下扇、扇三角洲、浅-较深湖相到滨浅湖相带展布,苏红图组以水下扇、火山岩相与滨浅湖相间互为特征,银根组沉积相逐渐为冲积扇与河流相所取代,最终建立查干凹陷湖盆沉积模式。
     通过岩电特征对比分析火山岩的测井响应,在地震剖面上建立火山岩地震响应及识别模式,火山岩岩相类型主要有:爆发相、溢流相和火山沉积相。火山岩展布规律研究表明,苏一时期到苏二早期,火山喷发中心由巴润断层转至毛西断层,到苏二晚期火山活动减弱,喷发中心转至巴润断层南段,银根组沉积时期,喷发中心位于虎勒断层与图拉格断层交汇处,在此基础上建立了查干凹陷裂隙式和中心式火山岩喷发模式。
     在层序地层学分析的基础上运用成藏理论对查干凹陷油气成藏条件特征进行了研究,包括烃源岩特征、储集特征、生储盖组合特征、油气运移特征、圈闭特征和保存特征等与成藏过程有关的各个方面。最终综合成藏特征分析了查干凹陷的油气富集控制因素,预测了乌南断鼻圈闭,乌力吉构造-岩性复合圈闭两个成藏有利区带。
Based on consulting a number of exploration experience of sag and structure research, we make full use of the theory of sequence stratigraphy to divide sequences, which is foundation framework of examining sedimentary facies and volcanic rock facies, and then we can anlysis the main conditions for oil accumulation by researching reservoir formation characteristics by means of accumulation theory.
     This paper uses mension seismic data from Chagan area to describe the complex structures. The structural style of this area involve Extensional Structures, reversal structures, strike-slip structures and Compound structures. Basing on the rule of sedimentary compensation, the formation thickness coefficient was advanced to study tectonic movement. The result shows that this area develops a tectonic movement which we named“seesaw”. The critical time of this tectonic movement was between the first member of Suhongtu Formation (K1s1) and the second member of it (K1s2). Basing on the conclusion above, Characteristics of Structural Evolution was studied by Analysis the balanced section and it involve 4 stage: faulting stage, faulted depression-depression stage, depression stage and shrinking stage.
     Based on sequence stratigraphy and analyses of cores, logging and seismic information, the sequence stratigraphy was classified and the sequence stratigraphic framework was established. The lower Cretaceous constitute a second-order sequences that can be further divided into 6 third-order sequences and 16 system tracts. Source orientation was studied by using Basement and fractured surface form, Seismic Reflection structure, Clay Mineral Assemblages, cuttings type and heavy mineral Combination. The result show that the main source of the western Depression come from south direction and north direction and the subordinate source come from XiNi uplift and MaoDun uplift. The main source of the eastern Depression come from east direction named Lang mountain.
     After establishing the sequence framework and researching source, we studied the distribution and evolution law of sedimentary facies in every system tract. There are different sedimentary facies associations in different formations which developed from earlier to later. The mainly sedimentary facies is the association of nearshore subaqueous fan, fan delta, shallow-semi-deep lake and shore-shallow lacustrine in the K1b. The sedimentary characteristic of K1s is the interbedding of underwater fan, volcanic facies and shore-shallow lacustrine. The association of alluvial fan and fluvial facies play more and more important part in the K1y. Finally the sedimentation model of Chagan basin is set up.
     Seismic response and recognition model of volcanic rock was established based on the comparison between rock-electricity character and seismic date. volcanic rock facies types mainly include: eruption facies, overflowfacies and volcanic sedimentary facies. We researched the volcanic rock distribution and the result show that the volcanic eruption centers was changed from the BaRen fault at K1s1 to MaoXi fault at early K1s2 then to south BaRen fault at late K1s2 and the volcanic eruption centers located in the Hule fault and Tulage fault crossing area at K1y. At last we established the eruption models including fissure type and central type.
     Applying the theory of oil accumulation and analysis of the sequence stratigraphy, I make a research, including the characteristic of source rock, reservoir, source-reservoir-cap assemblage, hydrocarbon migration, trap and preservation etc. After comprehensive research, we recognize the main influential factor of oil and gas accumulation and get the conclusion: fault nose trap of WuNan, structural-lithologic trap of WuLiji act as the exploration Favorable Zone.
引文
[1]薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清,等.湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:394-397
    [2]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:石油大学出版社,2000:4-20
    [3] Vail.P.R., Mitchm.R.M.J.,Thomposon. S. H. Seismic Stratigraphy And Global Changes of Sea level,Part-4,In:C.E.Pation(Editor):Seismic Stratigraphy Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration,Am.Assoc.Pt. Geol[J].AAPG Memoir. 1977,26:26-98
    [4] Vail P R.Sesmic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part 1:seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In:Bally A W. ed. Atlas of seismic stratigraphy. American Association of Petroleum Geologists[J]. Studies in Geology,1987,27:1-10
    [5] Galloway W E.Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I: architecture and genesis of flooding-surface bounded depositional units[J]. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists,1989,73:125-142
    [6] Cross T A, Baker M R, Chapin M A,et al.Applications of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy to reservoir analysis,in R. Eschard, and B.Doligez, (eds.),Subsurface Reservoir Characterization from Outcrop Observations[J]. Proceedings of the 7th TFP Exploration and Production Research Conference:Paris,Technip,1993:11-33
    [7] Cross T A and Lessenger M A.Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation, in F.M. Gradstein, K.O. Sandvik, and N.J. Milton, (eds.),Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications[M]. NPF Special Publication 8, 1998:171-195
    [8]聂逢君.层序地层学的起源及其发展[J].铀矿地质,2001,17(4):193-203
    [9]许效松.层序地层学研究进展[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(1):34-38
    [10] Posamentier FL W,Allen G P and Games D P. High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy-the East Coulee Delta, Alberta[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1992,62(2):310-317
    [11]Van.Wagoner.J.C.,Mitichum.R.M.,Posamentier.H.W.,et al. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition. In:Sea-Level Changes:AnIntegrated Approach (Ed. By Wilgus.C.K., Hastings.B.S., Kendall.C.G., Posamentier. H.W.,Ross.C.A. and Van.Wagoner.J.C.) [J]. SEPM. Special Publication,1988,42:39-46
    [12] CK威尔格斯等编,徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理[M].石油工业出版社,1993,1-185
    [13]张荣红,余素玉,邬金华.陆相湖盆中沉积物供给因素对层序地层分析的影响—以东营凹陷下第三系为例[J].地球科学,1997,22(2):139-144
    [14] Posamentier H W, Jervey M T&Wail P R. 1988, Eustatic controls on clastic depositionⅠ—conceptual framework. In:Wilgus C K,et al. Sea-level changes—an integrated approach[J]. SEPM Special Publication, V. 42,P .109-124
    [15] Posamentier H W, Jervey M T&Wail P R. 1988, Eustatic controls on clastic depositionⅡ—sequence and systems tract models. In:Wilgus C K,et al. Sea-level changes—an integrated approach[J]. SEPM Special Publication,V.42,P. 125-154
    [16] Shanlley, K. W and Mecabe, P. J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1994,78(4):544-568
    [17]薛良清.层序地层学在湖相盆地中的应用探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1990,17(6):29-34
    [18]高山林.陆相层序地层学若干问题的讨论[J].西北地质,1997,18(1):1-6
    [19]徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):83-89
    [20] Xu Huaida.sequence stratigraphic features of non-marine Cretaceous sediments in Songliao basin.northeast China[J]. AAPG,1991,75(3):598
    [21] Xu Huaida.sequence stratigraphic features of non-marine Tertiary sediments in rift basin of east China[J].AAPG,1992,76 (7):1134
    [22]刘宝珺,许效松.中国南方古大陆沉积地壳演化与成矿[M].北京:科学出版社,1993:61-65
    [23]邓宏文,王洪亮,等.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):91-114
    [24]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):91-97
    [25]邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏,等.河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):373-379
    [26]邓宏文,王洪亮,宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理—高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京). 2000.7(4):305-313
    [27]魏魁生,徐大怀.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1993,18(2):139-149
    [28]纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社, 1998:1-195
    [29]张世奇,纪友亮.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学模式探讨[J].石油勘探与开发.1996,23(5):23-28
    [30]姜在兴,李华启,等.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996:5-29
    [31]潘明臣,刘文海,单学东.辽西金羊盆地南部髫髻山组陆相火山岩及旋回层序划分[J].辽宁地质,2000,17(2):101-108
    [32]李继山,金贤镐.阳信洼陷沙三段火山岩地层的层序[J].大庆石油学院学报,2005,29(2):4-6
    [33]赵锡奎,朱利春,赵冠军,等.黔中早二叠世茅口晚期断裂陆缘层序地层分析[J].沉积学报,1997,15(1):92-96
    [34]赵锡奎.黔中早二叠世晚期织金拉张盆地原型分析[J].石油与天然气地质.1991,12(3):308-321
    [35]赵国连,何顺利.松辽盆地徐家围子裂陷式盆地的层序发育特点[J].西北地质,2002,35(1):28-40
    [36]程日辉,王璞珺,刘万洙,等.徐家围子断陷火山岩充填的层序地层[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(4):469-474
    [37]牟传龙,朱晓镇,邢雪芬.海相火山沉积盆地层序地层研究:以新疆阿舍勒、冲乎尔地区泥盆系地层为例[J].岩相古地理,1997,17(3):11-20
    [38]牛嘉玉,张映红,袁选俊,等.中国东部中、新生代火成岩石油地质研究、油气勘探前景及面临问题[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(1):7-21
    [39]程日辉.陆相盆地充填层序的类型——以辽西地区中生代盆地为例[J].沉积学报,1997,15(3):166-170
    [40]李宏伟,邓宏文,肖乾华,等.热欧地区残留可容纳空间分布及储集砂体预测[J].石油学报,2002,23(4):29-32
    [41]徐启平.西秦岭地区的麦秀群[J].地层学杂志,1994,18(4):282-288
    [42]徐怀大,肖庆辉.当代地质科学前沿——我国今后值得重视的前沿研究领域[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1993∶429-43
    [43] Weimer.R.J.Developments in sequence stratigraphy: foreland and cratonic basins-presidential address[J].AAPG Bull,1992,76(7)∶965-982
    [44]王存志.渤海下第三系层序地层特征及油气分布规律初探.中国海上油气(地质),1997,11(1):29-36
    [45]尹太举,张昌民.层序地层格架内的油气勘探[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(1):25-29
    [46]瞿辉,赵文智.层序格架在油气勘探中的作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(5):40-43
    [47]李群,王英民,宋国奇.层序地层学在陆相斜坡带隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(3):12-13
    [48]瞿辉,赵文智,徐怀大.陆相层序特征与油气勘探对策[J].勘探家,2000,5(3).:59-63
    [49]周雁,王成善,陈洪德,等.中扬子区海相地层油气成藏有利区层序样式分析[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(1):22-28
    [50]肖乾华,李宏伟,李云松.层序地层学原理与方法在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].断块油气田,1998,5(2):6-8
    [51]刘豪,王英民,王媛.试论陆相层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的意义[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(6):33-39
    [52]鲜本忠,姜在兴,操应长.泌阳凹陷东南部下切谷的发现及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(4):304-308
    [53]瞿辉.层序地层学及其在油气勘探中的运用[J].地学前缘,2000,7(增刊):257-261
    [54]李纯泉,陈红汉,王世杏,等.层序地层学中的凝缩段及其石油地质意义[J].天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(4):54-59
    [55]顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):484-489
    [56]郭彦如,于均民,樊太亮.查干凹陷下白垩统层序地层格架与演化[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):166-169
    [57]卫平生,张虎权,陈启林.银根—额济纳旗盆地油气地质特征及勘探前景[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006,50-51
    [58]张波.阳信洼陷陡坡带构造样式与油气成藏[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(3):58-60
    [59]戴俊生,陆克政,漆家福,等.渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式的演化[J].石油学报,1998,19(4):16-20
    [60]梁积伟,解东宁,何明喜,等.华北盆地南部构造样式分析[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(5):417-417
    [61]王永诗,鲜本忠.车镇凹陷北部陡坡带断裂结构及其对沉积和成藏的控制[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(6):5-8
    [62]韩晓黎,阿依古丽,伍菁华,等.准噶尔盆地东部边缘区构造格架及构造样式[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(3) :202-205
    [63]刘志宏,迟元林,王孔伟,等.塔里木盆地西部断层的活动性与封闭性[J].吉林大学学报,2004,34(1):61-66
    [64]白新华,罗群.断层封闭性评价研究[J].大庆石油学院学报,1998,22(1):89-92.
    [65]付广,孟庆芬.断层封闭性影响因素的理论分析[J].天然气地球科学,2002,13(3-4):40-44
    [66] Andrew D Hindle. Petroleum migration pathways and charge concentration: a three-dimension model[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(9): 1451-1481
    [67]李春光.中国东部盆地油气藏同生断层的定量研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2003,10(4):2-4
    [68]李勤英,罗凤芝,苗翠芝.断层活动速率研究方法及应用探讨[J].断块油气田,1999,7(2):15-17
    [69]吴智平,李伟,郑德顺,等.沾化凹陷中、新生代断裂发育及其形成机制分析[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(3):405-415
    [70]赵密福,刘泽荣,信荃麟,等.惠民凹陷临南地区断层活动特征及控油作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(6):9-11
    [71]陈刚强,王伟锋,万钧.民丰洼陷断层活动性及其对层序的控制作用[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):480-482
    [72]王锦喜,刘琼,张树林.江汉盆地西南缘主干断层活动性分析[J].重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2005,7(3):6-10
    [73]张世奇,纪友亮,高岭.平衡剖面分析技术在松辽盆地构造演化恢复中的应用[J].新疆地质,2003,21(4):489-490
    [74]胡斌,齐丽军,张辉,等.平衡剖面在焉耆盆地构造演化分析中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28(4):17-21
    [75]汤济广,梅廉夫,沈传波,等.平衡剖面技术在盆地构造分析中的应用进展及存在的问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(6):19-22
    [76]王新民,李天顺.查干改造型凹陷下白垩统储层及油气分布特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):65-70
    [77]林卫东.查干凹陷原油地球化学特征与油源对比[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):249-251
    [78]高渐珍,吴光兴,张放东.查干凹陷毛敦次凸起的形成演化及其与油气的关系[J].中国海上油气(地质),2002,16(6):389-393
    [79]王生朗,马维民,竺知新,等.银根—额济纳旗盆地查干凹陷构造-沉积格架与油气勘探方向[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(4):296-299
    [80]陶国强.内蒙古银额盆地查干凹陷烃源岩生烃和排烃史研究[J].现代地质,2002,16(1):65-70
    [81]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,27(2):23-26
    [82]操应长,姜在兴,王留奇,等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层单元的划分及界而识别标志[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版) ,1996,20(4):1-5
    [83]中国石油天然气集团公司,油气储层重点实验室编.陆相层序地层学应用指南[M],北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-82
    [84]张志伟,张龙海.测井评价烃源岩的方法及其应用效果[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3):84-87
    [85]操应长,姜在兴.声波时差测井资料识别层序地层单元界面的方法、原理及实例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):318-322
    [86]冯友良,李思田.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):119-131
    [87]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J] .石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):6-10
    [88]朱筱敏,康安.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2)283-287
    [89]张志全.渤南洼陷沙四段下亚段沉积相识别[J].河南石油,2003,17(4):22-25
    [90]赵培坤,纪友亮.鄂尔多斯西缘前陆盆地上古生界沉积相特征研究[J].新疆地质,2005,23(2):152-157
    [91]曾流芳,彭德堂,高振中,等.孤东地区下第三系沙河街组沉积相分析[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(2):10-11
    [92]牛敏荃(译).地震地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1980:85-135
    [93]杨长清.松辽盆地上侏罗-下白垩统地震地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(3):257-263
    [94]张万选,张厚福,曾洪流.区域地震地层学研究[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1988:12-77
    [95]黎文,周志才,吴焱.用地震剖面划分沉积微相[J].石油物探,2000,39(1):57-62
    [96]黄锋,李志荣,廖玲,等.利用地震资料进行沉积相分析[J].物探化探计算技术.2003,25(3):197-201
    [97]何贞铭,林克湘,王振奇,等.牛心坨油田牛心坨油层沉积相分析[J].江汉石油学院学报,2000,22(3):15-19
    [98]柯光明,郑荣才,高红灿.胜坨油田一区沙河街组二段1—3砂组测井-沉积相分析[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2006,26(1):81-87
    [99]李维锋.塔里木盆地西南坳陷上第三系沉积相特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(增刊):1-3
    [100]戴林,纪友亮,刘成鑫.阿尔金斜坡地区上、下油砂山组沉积相分析[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(2):172-174
    [101]张世晖,刘天佑,顾汉明,等.巴彦浩特盆地火成岩的综合地球物理解释[J].物探与化探,2003,27(5):383-386
    [102]夏步余,谌廷姗.地震技术在火成岩发育区开发中的应用[J].石油物探,2002,41(4):461-465
    [103]钟广法,邓常念,周志松.塔中地区火成岩的地震相及圈闭特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,1997,19(3):34-37
    [104]王惠民,靳涛,杨红霞.银根盆地查干凹陷火成岩岩相特征及其识别标志[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(3):249-252
    [105]陶国强,肖斌.银-额盆地岩浆岩地震反射特征及与油气关系分析[J].断块油气田,2001,8(6):11-14
    [106]吕希学,肖焕钦,刘惠民.根据地震勘查信息预测火成岩储集体[J].浙江大学学报,2003,37(2):249-253
    [107]徐刚,王兴谋,邱隆伟,等.惠民凹陷商741井区火成岩储集层研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):99-102
    [108]王华崇,冉启全,胡永乐.大港枣园油田火成岩岩相[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(5):21-24
    [109]陈云海,林春明,张云银.济阳拗陷新生代火成岩的识别[J].石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(6):663-669
    [110]李家康.渤海油气成藏特点及与断层关系[J].石油学报,2001,22(2):26-31
    [111]姜秀芳,宗国洪,郭玉新.断裂坡折带低位扇成因及成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):143-144
    [112]庞雄奇,李素梅,金之钧,等.渤海湾盆地八面河地区油气运聚与成藏特征分析[J].地球科学,2004,34(增刊):152-161
    [113]蒋有录.东辛复杂断块油气田成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(1):68-73
    [114]刘士林,李原,郭利果,等.渤南洼陷沙三段原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(4):1-3
    [115]杨永才,常象春,张枝焕.英吉苏凹陷石油地球化学特征及油源对比[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(4):410-413
    [116]吴亚东,闫煜彪,唐晓川,等.黄骅坳陷齐家务地区的油源对比[J].现代地质,2005,19(4):579-583
    [117]卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].西安工程学院学报,2000,22(2):56-59
    [118]李安华.陇川盆地中新统砂岩储层研究[J].云南地质,1994,13(1):57-66
    [119]顾家裕.塔里木盆地石炭系东河砂岩沉积环境分析及储层研究[J].地质学报,1996,70(2):153-160
    [120]王端平,张敬轩.胜利油区埕北30潜山油藏储层研究[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):346-349
    [121]杨琦.查干凹陷下白垩统碎屑岩储集层特征研究[J].西北地质, 2000,33(3):13-17
    [122]王惠民,靳涛,高志前,等.查干凹陷碎屑岩储集层特征及有利区带预测[J].新疆石油天然气,2005,1(1):43-47
    [123]杨占龙,郭精义,陈启林,等.银根盆地查干凹陷火山沉积岩岩相特征及其识别标志[J].沉积学报,2005,23(1):67-69
    [124]王全柱.火成岩储层研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(2):13-16
    [125]孟宪波,何新,韩淑静,等.商741地区火成岩储层研究[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(1):78-81
    [126]吴江山,张保银,刘瑞红.惠民凹陷东部火成岩披覆油藏特征及构造描述[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(1):43-46

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700