大庆探区外围中、新生代断陷盆地群油气地质条件及远景评价
|
摘要
本文是在全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价项目——大庆探区外围中、新生代断陷盆地油气地质条件综合评价(XQ-2004-07-06)课题支撑下完成的。以石油地质为主线,强调基础地质条件对油气形成和聚集的控制作用,综合前中生代基底构造及演化、中-新生代盆地构造、古地理格局、烃源岩特征等方面的研究成果分析的基础上,运用多手段、多方面资料和成果信息,将大庆探区外围盆地划分为东、中、西3个含油气盆地群、6个勘探层系、7个盆地系统、5种盆地类比类型、5个成盆构造演化阶段。这一时空框架控制了研究区油气发育的基本格局。在这一时空格架下,应用数学统计方法,通过基础地质框架下油气远景评价、盆地模拟评价、多参数油气地质评价,对外围盆地进行优选排序,优选出汤原、方正、大杨树、三江、延吉、孙吴-嘉荫、漠河6个盆地作为一类远景盆地,并通过神经网络确定各参数层的权重基础上,对勘探程度较高汤原、方正、三江(西)、延吉盆地,在油气地质与评价系统(PrtroGIAS)下,应用多源信息叠合进行了有利区带预测;对勘探程度较低的大杨树、孙吴-嘉荫、漠河三个盆地,通过最新MT资料、重磁反演、地震解释结果及油气地质条件的分析,并进行油气远景评价,提出主要勘探区与战略远景区。这无疑对大庆探区外围主要盆地油气勘探目标的优选创造了新的条件,对加深盆地的形成演化规律和油气勘探的研究都具有非常重要的意义。
This thesis is completed under the support of the investigation and appraisal project of the national oil and gas resources strategy electoral district-the comprehensive evaluationof oil and gas geological quality of the Cainozoic Era breaks falls basin in the periphery of Daqing prospecting region (XQ-2004-07-06). The research area is the periphery basin group of Daqing prospecting region, which is distributed within the boundaries of Heilongjiang Province, Hulunbeier City of InnerMongolia Autonomous Region and Jilin Province. Besides Songliao basin, and Hairlar basin, there are 28 sedimentary basins with an area of more than 200km2, and the total area of the basin group amounts to 18.53×104 km2. These basins are close to an important oil and gas production area--Songliao basin in our country, but the proving rate of these basins is relatively low, which demonstrates that they still have much exploration potentiality. The exploration achievement obtained unceasingly in recent years, has continuously increased the oil reserves of our country, all of which has indicated the urgency and importance of further development of oil-gas exploration in periphery basin of Daqing prospecting region.
The oil-gas prospect appraisal is an important link in the oil-gas exploration process which involves many geological data and the assessment methods. Through comprehensive analysis of the multiple source geoscience information, the oil-gas prospect appraisal makes an overall assessment of oil-gas resources potentiality in a certain area, and then optimize the advantageous area belt. The oil-gas prospect appraisal is a kind of system engineering, which provides policy-making support for further exploration and development and plays an influential role in the oil-gas exploration and development.
Along with the further development of the oil-gas exploration work, massive multiple source geoscience information has been obtained, such as geology, geophysics, geochemistry, remote sensing material and so on. However, it is not only time-consuming and hard sledding to withdraw the useful information from these numerous material to carry on this work, but also needs lots of investment. Moreover, the anticipated effect is difficult to be achieved, and also, the method and technology cannot be promoted well. Along with the rapid development of computer technology, it has been widely used in the scientific research of various trades and occupations, A broad prospect for carrying on the oil-gas resource appraisal has been developed by using the computer technology to process the massive geoscience material fast and effectively .
GIS has the formidable spatial analysis function to geoscience data, can obtain the concealed important conclusion from the known geoscience data and derives new information, meanwhile , as a model of the real world, it will make a generalized analysis of the appraisal results and function of the real world's each side thought. Therefore , using GIS is an important way to make full use of known data and extract latent information as well as raises the oil-gas forecasting level. To carry on the oil-gas resource appraisal , massive petroleum geology factors must be taken into consider ,which include lots of conditions, the amount of resources and the economic evaluation, such as foundation stratum research ,source bed, reservoir bed , cap bed and their combination relations of target zone, trap,oil-gas migration and the preservation and so on. All these factors are related to certain geography space position, have spatial information characteristic. Based on the analysis and research of the petroleum geology theory, the petroleum geologists express the above various factors by the way of graphic mode, and finally achieve the generalized evaluation goal of the oil-gas resources through the overall analysis of all kinds of graphic document.
From the history of study and current situation, the periphery basin exploration and the research degree are low. In the central and western basin group, the study of petroleum geology is relatively weak, mostly giving priority to non-earthquake information on the Earth's materials that mainly focus on large-scale gravity and magnetic exploration, magnetotelluric sounding over the oil field investigation and geological survey; Although the eastern part of the basin group has been the exploration focus of the external Songliao Basin, the basin is many and small, highly divided, post-structural role in the transformation and strong destruction, which exploration and research is difficult, so the overall extent of the exploration area are lower, moreover various basins' research degree phase difference is disparate. On this basis, our predecessors in the periphery of the basin, carried out on a lot of research work, but in the main basin, such as the structural layer, phase of tectonic evolution, basin type, thermal history and the basin hydrocarbon compound maturity history, the advantageous area belt forecast and so on that the question research still has certain difference, and is restricting the periphery basin oil gas prospect appraisal.
The periphery basin of Daqing prospecting region is mostly the transformation- superposition basin. The overall exploration degree is relatively low, which is characterized by the multi-cover hydrocarbon source rock, many kinds combination of reservoir bed and cap bed, the multi crude and platoon hydrocarbon and multi-stage petroleum reservoir characteristics and so on. It is extrapolated that there exist sources of many kinds of oil-gases. Usually exploration goal level burying depth to be big, experience long-term evolution, the oil gas pool charge history is complex and the oil-gas distribution rule has been restricted by many kinds of factors. The complexity of oil-gas’s formation and accumulation in the superposition basin has determined that the oil-gas prospect appraisal could not be carried on with conventional and simple norm or rule.
Therefore, this article when carries on the oil gas prospect appraisal to the research area, take the petroleum geology as the master line, emphasizing the basis of geological conditions on the formation and accumulation of control oil and gas, integrated research results based the analysis on pre-Mesozoic basement structure and evolution, the Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era basin structure, the ancient geography pattern, hydrocarbon source rock characteristic and so on. Utilizing the multi-methods, various material and achievement information, Daqing Exploration Area is divided into three basin groups of eastern, central and western, six-storey department exploration , seven Basin system, six exploration formation ,four kinds of basin types, three kinds of superimposition relationship ,and experiences five stages of basin tectonic evolution. This space and time frame has controlled growth oil and gas basic pattern in the research area.
Under this space and time frame, Using the geological analogy method, from three level's geological feature of the region, the basin, the internal of basin, carries on research on control migration and accumulation basic geologic factors research such as regional geology background, geostructure evolvement, basin structure and evolvement, deposition and backfill history and volcanic activity .Moreover, find out the relationship between with oil and gas and composition and structure of oil and gas basin fundus, volcanic rocks and the role of volcanic, basin tectonic, basin filling sequence, basin evolution, regional fault. Finally, carry through sorting preferred Basin from basic geological framework. Using basin modeling techniques, carry on sorting preferred Basin by simulation results of terra history, thermal history, mature history. Under multi parameter conditions, Making full use of computer technology, carry on sorting preferred basin by condition such as basic geological factors, and source bed, reservoir bed, cap bed, combination relationship. Establishing evaluation model of oil and gas basing on neural network to determine parameters weight, The thesis carries on predicting favorable play for basins of higher exploration levels such as Tangyuan– Fangzheng and west of Sanjiang and Yanji basin by multi-source information superimposed method basing on PrtroGIAS. For basins of lower exploration levels such as Dayangshu and Sunwu-Jiayin and Mohe basins, The authors carries on forecasts for oil and gas and proposes the main exploration area and the strategic prospect area by up-to-date information of MT, gravity and magnetic inversion and seismic interpretation. The final results obtained the understanding of the following:
①P utting forward five evolution stages experienced, development 4 kinds of basin types and 3 kinds of superimposition relations in Basins of study area
On the basis of deeply researching about earth structure evolvement in the study area and the adjacent areas, This thesis proposed the research area had experienced five major stages of basin structure evolution, namely Late Triassic - Early Jurassic and Middle Jurassic and Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous and Late Cretaceous and Paleogene. Different times the intensity and way of tectonic movement are some differences in eastern, central and western of study area; The eastern area take place thrusting nappe structure, while the Cainozoic Era has superimposed along the region branch break growth linear rift valley basin as a characteristic; The features of central region ware that development with a complete rift and depression in two stages of the rift basin ;According to different spatial relationship during Basin formation, the western area take foreland basin(compressional basins) in early -middle Jurassic period and volcano down-fault basin in early chalk volcano period as characteristic. The west main growth foreland \ down-fault -type of superposition basin as characteristic ,while the central area main take down-fault\ depression -type of superposition basin and the eastern area take rift valley\ down-fault \compression \draw dispart-type of superposition basin as characteristic. These three kinds of superimposition relations reflected obvious difference from evolve history in western,eastern and central areas of three basin groups of the research area in Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era.
②T ime and space pattern of oil-gas growth of Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era basin determined in the periphery of Daqing prospecting region
In the horizontal by comprehensive study on structure subarea, basin-fill sequences and basin tectonic evolution, The research area may divide into the eastern part, middle, the western part of oil and gas bearing basin group by the boundary of Jiayin-Mudanjiang hybrid rocks belt and Nenjiang River-Balihan stretch-track-slip tectonic zone. And Dayangshu basin ,which belong to the western basin generally, through analysis of causes of formation between with Dayangshu basin and Songliao Basin, Dayangshu basin came into being down-faulted basins system along western margin of Nenjiang - Kailu breaks, so it is believed that belong to central basin group.
According to basins structure characteristic, deposition backfill sequence and evolved history for 14 basins in the research area and various basins in adjacent areas, The thesis classified as seven basin system (or basin system)for 14 basins, whichⅠ,Ⅲ,Ⅴbasin system has been access to oil and gas breakthrough, so Sunwu-Jiayin basin, Dayangshu basin, Gehe-Labudalin basin and Tangyuan- Fangzheng down-faulted basins are speculated to have the big oil gas prospect by contrasting with regional basic geological conditions
In the vertical, by contrasting stratum with Songliao basin and Hailar Basin, the exploration layers are divided into six exploration strata series (including Carboniferous - Permian), in which, The first, the second and the third layer are worth paying attention to important exploration strata series; The fourth - the sixth exploration strata series have obtained the industry oil and gas current in Daqing and Daqing periphery; The fourth and the fifth exploration strata series oil and gas contribution strata in middle bearing oil and gas basin group ;The fourth exploration strata series is oil and gas contribution strata in west bearing oil and gas basin group ;The sixth exploration strata series is oil and gas contribution strata in eastern bearing oil and gas basin group.
This space and time frame has controlled growth oil and gas basic pattern in the research area.
③Establishing the geology analogous model of the prospect appraisal of oil-gas basin
According to the structure and composition of basin basement, basin types, evolution basin evolution and comprehensive study about oil-gas geological condition, the research area mainly includes 5 types of oil-gas prospect geology analogy evaluation models, which are the remaining basin and down-fault\ depression of double-decked basin and down-fault and compression and pull-apart basin. Eastern oil-gas basin groups mainly include the remaining basin and pull-apart basin, while the middle oil-gas basin group mainly bears the down-fault\ depression basin, and the western area mainly bears down-fault and compression basin. These basins can be regarded as a scale, and make a comparison with these 5 types of typical basins in the research area in order to forecast the oil-gas prospect.
④Using variety of methods to carrying on sorting preferred basin in Daqing periphery basins
Using the geological analogy method, from three level's geological feature of the region, the basin, the internal of basin, carries on research on control basic geologic factors of formation and migration and accumulation such as regional geology background and geostructure evolvement and basin structure and evolvement and deposition and backfill history and volcanic activity .Moreover, finding out the relationship between with oil and gas and composition and structure of oil and gas basin fundus and volcanic rocks and the role of volcanic and basin tectonic and basin filling sequence and basin evolution and regional fault. Finally ,carrying through sorting preferred basin from basic geological framework. Using basin modeling techniques, carrying on sorting preferred basin by simulation results of terra history and thermal history and mature history. Under multi parameter conditions, Making full use of computer technology, carry on sorting preferred basin by condition such as basic geological factors and source bed and reservoir bed and cap bed and combination relationship. The authors establish appraise model and make use of multiplication law to preferred sort and queue. Finally, the authors sort and queue 6 key basins such as Tangyuan - Fangzgeng, dayangshu, Sanjiang, Yanji, Sunwu - Jiayin,Mohe basins by synthetizing three methods
⑤Completed oil and gas prospect evaluation for keystone basin and favorable play evaluation for major exploration layer in keystone basin
For Tangyuan - Fangzheng, West of Sanjiang basin and Yanji basin which have more of the wells, higher exploration levels, rich oil gas material Through a number of known oil and gas characteristics attribute value of favorable play for network learning training by using artificial neural network, then determined parameters weight and established evaluation model of oil and gas, The thesis carries on predicting favorable play basing on PrtroGIAS by multi-source information superimposed method.The result is as the following: Xin-an villages group of Tangyuan down-fault are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Rongfeng-Shengli-Dongfa syncline area and Dongxing-Jixiang structure area and Shuangxing-Xinhua syncline area and; Xin-an villages group of Fangzheng down-fault are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Baoxing structure area and Xiaolantun structure area and Zuoshugang slop break and Deshan syncline area and Fang D4 structure area and Xiangshun structure area; Chengzihe group of Suibin depression, Sanjiang basin are been divided into2 advantageous exploration areas, namely Bincan -1belt in Nandalinzi sag and Beian belt in eastern slopes; Dalazi group of Yanji basin are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Chaoyangchuan-Tongfusi and the peripheral of Yanji city and Zhuangyandong-Chongming, which are located in Chaoyang Sichuan sag and Qingchaguan sag and Dexin sag ;For basins of lower exploration levels such as Dayangshu, Sunwu-Jiayin and Mohe, The authors carries on forecasts for oil and gas and proposes the main exploration area and the strategic prospect area by up-to-date information of MT, gravity and magnetic inversion and seismic interpretation.
⑥Proposing three new exploration domains which are worth paying attention to .
Based on the comprehensive research of foundation geology in the entire district, the authors has proposed three worthwhile exploration strata series, namely , Carboniferous– Permian in the basin depth of Songliao basin and Upper Triassic- Lower Jurassic in the basin depth of in the eastern part of big three river basin and middle Jurassic in the Mohe basin, while these exploration strata series are worth paying attention to .
This thesis is completed under the support of the investigation and appraisal project of the national oil and gas resources strategy electoral district-the comprehensive evaluationof oil and gas geological quality of the Cainozoic Era breaks falls basin in the periphery of Daqing prospecting region (XQ-2004-07-06). The research area is the periphery basin group of Daqing prospecting region, which is distributed within the boundaries of Heilongjiang Province, Hulunbeier City of InnerMongolia Autonomous Region and Jilin Province. Besides Songliao basin, and Hairlar basin, there are 28 sedimentary basins with an area of more than 200km2, and the total area of the basin group amounts to 18.53×104 km2. These basins are close to an important oil and gas production area--Songliao basin in our country, but the proving rate of these basins is relatively low, which demonstrates that they still have much exploration potentiality. The exploration achievement obtained unceasingly in recent years, has continuously increased the oil reserves of our country, all of which has indicated the urgency and importance of further development of oil-gas exploration in periphery basin of Daqing prospecting region.
The oil-gas prospect appraisal is an important link in the oil-gas exploration process which involves many geological data and the assessment methods. Through comprehensive analysis of the multiple source geoscience information, the oil-gas prospect appraisal makes an overall assessment of oil-gas resources potentiality in a certain area, and then optimize the advantageous area belt. The oil-gas prospect appraisal is a kind of system engineering, which provides policy-making support for further exploration and development and plays an influential role in the oil-gas exploration and development.
Along with the further development of the oil-gas exploration work, massive multiple source geoscience information has been obtained, such as geology, geophysics, geochemistry, remote sensing material and so on. However, it is not only time-consuming and hard sledding to withdraw the useful information from these numerous material to carry on this work, but also needs lots of investment. Moreover, the anticipated effect is difficult to be achieved, and also, the method and technology cannot be promoted well. Along with the rapid development of computer technology, it has been widely used in the scientific research of various trades and occupations, A broad prospect for carrying on the oil-gas resource appraisal has been developed by using the computer technology to process the massive geoscience material fast and effectively .
GIS has the formidable spatial analysis function to geoscience data, can obtain the concealed important conclusion from the known geoscience data and derives new information, meanwhile , as a model of the real world, it will make a generalized analysis of the appraisal results and function of the real world's each side thought. Therefore , using GIS is an important way to make full use of known data and extract latent information as well as raises the oil-gas forecasting level. To carry on the oil-gas resource appraisal , massive petroleum geology factors must be taken into consider ,which include lots of conditions, the amount of resources and the economic evaluation, such as foundation stratum research ,source bed, reservoir bed , cap bed and their combination relations of target zone, trap,oil-gas migration and the preservation and so on. All these factors are related to certain geography space position, have spatial information characteristic. Based on the analysis and research of the petroleum geology theory, the petroleum geologists express the above various factors by the way of graphic mode, and finally achieve the generalized evaluation goal of the oil-gas resources through the overall analysis of all kinds of graphic document.
From the history of study and current situation, the periphery basin exploration and the research degree are low. In the central and western basin group, the study of petroleum geology is relatively weak, mostly giving priority to non-earthquake information on the Earth's materials that mainly focus on large-scale gravity and magnetic exploration, magnetotelluric sounding over the oil field investigation and geological survey; Although the eastern part of the basin group has been the exploration focus of the external Songliao Basin, the basin is many and small, highly divided, post-structural role in the transformation and strong destruction, which exploration and research is difficult, so the overall extent of the exploration area are lower, moreover various basins' research degree phase difference is disparate. On this basis, our predecessors in the periphery of the basin, carried out on a lot of research work, but in the main basin, such as the structural layer, phase of tectonic evolution, basin type, thermal history and the basin hydrocarbon compound maturity history, the advantageous area belt forecast and so on that the question research still has certain difference, and is restricting the periphery basin oil gas prospect appraisal.
The periphery basin of Daqing prospecting region is mostly the transformation- superposition basin. The overall exploration degree is relatively low, which is characterized by the multi-cover hydrocarbon source rock, many kinds combination of reservoir bed and cap bed, the multi crude and platoon hydrocarbon and multi-stage petroleum reservoir characteristics and so on. It is extrapolated that there exist sources of many kinds of oil-gases. Usually exploration goal level burying depth to be big, experience long-term evolution, the oil gas pool charge history is complex and the oil-gas distribution rule has been restricted by many kinds of factors. The complexity of oil-gas’s formation and accumulation in the superposition basin has determined that the oil-gas prospect appraisal could not be carried on with conventional and simple norm or rule.
Therefore, this article when carries on the oil gas prospect appraisal to the research area, take the petroleum geology as the master line, emphasizing the basis of geological conditions on the formation and accumulation of control oil and gas, integrated research results based the analysis on pre-Mesozoic basement structure and evolution, the Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era basin structure, the ancient geography pattern, hydrocarbon source rock characteristic and so on. Utilizing the multi-methods, various material and achievement information, Daqing Exploration Area is divided into three basin groups of eastern, central and western, six-storey department exploration , seven Basin system, six exploration formation ,four kinds of basin types, three kinds of superimposition relationship ,and experiences five stages of basin tectonic evolution. This space and time frame has controlled growth oil and gas basic pattern in the research area.
Under this space and time frame, Using the geological analogy method, from three level's geological feature of the region, the basin, the internal of basin, carries on research on control migration and accumulation basic geologic factors research such as regional geology background, geostructure evolvement, basin structure and evolvement, deposition and backfill history and volcanic activity .Moreover, find out the relationship between with oil and gas and composition and structure of oil and gas basin fundus, volcanic rocks and the role of volcanic, basin tectonic, basin filling sequence, basin evolution, regional fault. Finally, carry through sorting preferred Basin from basic geological framework. Using basin modeling techniques, carry on sorting preferred Basin by simulation results of terra history, thermal history, mature history. Under multi parameter conditions, Making full use of computer technology, carry on sorting preferred basin by condition such as basic geological factors, and source bed, reservoir bed, cap bed, combination relationship. Establishing evaluation model of oil and gas basing on neural network to determine parameters weight, The thesis carries on predicting favorable play for basins of higher exploration levels such as Tangyuan– Fangzheng and west of Sanjiang and Yanji basin by multi-source information superimposed method basing on PrtroGIAS. For basins of lower exploration levels such as Dayangshu and Sunwu-Jiayin and Mohe basins, The authors carries on forecasts for oil and gas and proposes the main exploration area and the strategic prospect area by up-to-date information of MT, gravity and magnetic inversion and seismic interpretation. The final results obtained the understanding of the following:
①P utting forward five evolution stages experienced, development 4 kinds of basin types and 3 kinds of superimposition relations in Basins of study area
On the basis of deeply researching about earth structure evolvement in the study area and the adjacent areas, This thesis proposed the research area had experienced five major stages of basin structure evolution, namely Late Triassic - Early Jurassic and Middle Jurassic and Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous and Late Cretaceous and Paleogene. Different times the intensity and way of tectonic movement are some differences in eastern, central and western of study area; The eastern area take place thrusting nappe structure, while the Cainozoic Era has superimposed along the region branch break growth linear rift valley basin as a characteristic; The features of central region ware that development with a complete rift and depression in two stages of the rift basin ;According to different spatial relationship during Basin formation, the western area take foreland basin(compressional basins) in early -middle Jurassic period and volcano down-fault basin in early chalk volcano period as characteristic. The west main growth foreland \ down-fault -type of superposition basin as characteristic ,while the central area main take down-fault\ depression -type of superposition basin and the eastern area take rift valley\ down-fault \compression \draw dispart-type of superposition basin as characteristic. These three kinds of superimposition relations reflected obvious difference from evolve history in western,eastern and central areas of three basin groups of the research area in Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era.
②T ime and space pattern of oil-gas growth of Mesozoic-Cainozoic Era basin determined in the periphery of Daqing prospecting region
In the horizontal by comprehensive study on structure subarea, basin-fill sequences and basin tectonic evolution, The research area may divide into the eastern part, middle, the western part of oil and gas bearing basin group by the boundary of Jiayin-Mudanjiang hybrid rocks belt and Nenjiang River-Balihan stretch-track-slip tectonic zone. And Dayangshu basin ,which belong to the western basin generally, through analysis of causes of formation between with Dayangshu basin and Songliao Basin, Dayangshu basin came into being down-faulted basins system along western margin of Nenjiang - Kailu breaks, so it is believed that belong to central basin group.
According to basins structure characteristic, deposition backfill sequence and evolved history for 14 basins in the research area and various basins in adjacent areas, The thesis classified as seven basin system (or basin system)for 14 basins, whichⅠ,Ⅲ,Ⅴbasin system has been access to oil and gas breakthrough, so Sunwu-Jiayin basin, Dayangshu basin, Gehe-Labudalin basin and Tangyuan- Fangzheng down-faulted basins are speculated to have the big oil gas prospect by contrasting with regional basic geological conditions
In the vertical, by contrasting stratum with Songliao basin and Hailar Basin, the exploration layers are divided into six exploration strata series (including Carboniferous - Permian), in which, The first, the second and the third layer are worth paying attention to important exploration strata series; The fourth - the sixth exploration strata series have obtained the industry oil and gas current in Daqing and Daqing periphery; The fourth and the fifth exploration strata series oil and gas contribution strata in middle bearing oil and gas basin group ;The fourth exploration strata series is oil and gas contribution strata in west bearing oil and gas basin group ;The sixth exploration strata series is oil and gas contribution strata in eastern bearing oil and gas basin group.
This space and time frame has controlled growth oil and gas basic pattern in the research area.
③Establishing the geology analogous model of the prospect appraisal of oil-gas basin
According to the structure and composition of basin basement, basin types, evolution basin evolution and comprehensive study about oil-gas geological condition, the research area mainly includes 5 types of oil-gas prospect geology analogy evaluation models, which are the remaining basin and down-fault\ depression of double-decked basin and down-fault and compression and pull-apart basin. Eastern oil-gas basin groups mainly include the remaining basin and pull-apart basin, while the middle oil-gas basin group mainly bears the down-fault\ depression basin, and the western area mainly bears down-fault and compression basin. These basins can be regarded as a scale, and make a comparison with these 5 types of typical basins in the research area in order to forecast the oil-gas prospect.
④Using variety of methods to carrying on sorting preferred basin in Daqing periphery basins
Using the geological analogy method, from three level's geological feature of the region, the basin, the internal of basin, carries on research on control basic geologic factors of formation and migration and accumulation such as regional geology background and geostructure evolvement and basin structure and evolvement and deposition and backfill history and volcanic activity .Moreover, finding out the relationship between with oil and gas and composition and structure of oil and gas basin fundus and volcanic rocks and the role of volcanic and basin tectonic and basin filling sequence and basin evolution and regional fault. Finally ,carrying through sorting preferred basin from basic geological framework. Using basin modeling techniques, carrying on sorting preferred basin by simulation results of terra history and thermal history and mature history. Under multi parameter conditions, Making full use of computer technology, carry on sorting preferred basin by condition such as basic geological factors and source bed and reservoir bed and cap bed and combination relationship. The authors establish appraise model and make use of multiplication law to preferred sort and queue. Finally, the authors sort and queue 6 key basins such as Tangyuan - Fangzgeng, dayangshu, Sanjiang, Yanji, Sunwu - Jiayin,Mohe basins by synthetizing three methods
⑤Completed oil and gas prospect evaluation for keystone basin and favorable play evaluation for major exploration layer in keystone basin
For Tangyuan - Fangzheng, West of Sanjiang basin and Yanji basin which have more of the wells, higher exploration levels, rich oil gas material Through a number of known oil and gas characteristics attribute value of favorable play for network learning training by using artificial neural network, then determined parameters weight and established evaluation model of oil and gas, The thesis carries on predicting favorable play basing on PrtroGIAS by multi-source information superimposed method.The result is as the following: Xin-an villages group of Tangyuan down-fault are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Rongfeng-Shengli-Dongfa syncline area and Dongxing-Jixiang structure area and Shuangxing-Xinhua syncline area and; Xin-an villages group of Fangzheng down-fault are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Baoxing structure area and Xiaolantun structure area and Zuoshugang slop break and Deshan syncline area and Fang D4 structure area and Xiangshun structure area; Chengzihe group of Suibin depression, Sanjiang basin are been divided into2 advantageous exploration areas, namely Bincan -1belt in Nandalinzi sag and Beian belt in eastern slopes; Dalazi group of Yanji basin are been divided into 3 advantageous exploration areas, namely Chaoyangchuan-Tongfusi and the peripheral of Yanji city and Zhuangyandong-Chongming, which are located in Chaoyang Sichuan sag and Qingchaguan sag and Dexin sag ;For basins of lower exploration levels such as Dayangshu, Sunwu-Jiayin and Mohe, The authors carries on forecasts for oil and gas and proposes the main exploration area and the strategic prospect area by up-to-date information of MT, gravity and magnetic inversion and seismic interpretation.
⑥Proposing three new exploration domains which are worth paying attention to .
Based on the comprehensive research of foundation geology in the entire district, the authors has proposed three worthwhile exploration strata series, namely , Carboniferous– Permian in the basin depth of Songliao basin and Upper Triassic- Lower Jurassic in the basin depth of in the eastern part of big three river basin and middle Jurassic in the Mohe basin, while these exploration strata series are worth paying attention to .
引文
[1] Atwater G I. Future of Louisiana offshore oil province [J]. AAPG Bull,1956, 40(10):2624-2634.
[2]Aoyagi K.Palaeotemperature analysis by authigenic minerals and its application to petroleum exploration[J].AAPG,1984,68:903-913.
[3]Barker R A., Gehman H M., James W R., and White D A. Geologic field number and size assessments of oil and gas plays [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1984, 68(4):426-432.
[4] Barberi F.1982.Chemical aspects of rift maganticsm. In: Pal mason G, ed. Continental and Oceanic Rifts,223-258.
[5] Barr D. 1987. Structural / strition graphic models for extensional basins of half graben type: Journal of Structural Geology, 9(4): 491-500.
[6] Bordine J H, Stecker M S, Watts A B.1981.Observations of flexure and the rheology of the oceanic lithosphere. J Geo phys Res, 86:3695-3707.
[7] Braun J, Beau mount C.1989.A physical explanation of the relation between flank uplifts and breakup unconformity at rifted continental margins. Geology,17:760-764.
[8] Bridge J S, Diemer J A.1983.Quantitative interpretation of an evolving ancient river system. Sedimentlogy,30:599-623.
[9]Busby C J,Ingeroll R V. Tectonic of sedimentary basins.Blackwell Science,1995,331-393.
[10]陈发景.塔北地区变形样式及其分布规律[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(6):755-768.
[11]陈发景.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1996,21 (4):366～372.
[12]陈发景.中国中、新生代含油气盆地成因类型、构造体系及地球动力学模式[J].现代地质,1997,11(4):410-422.
[13]陈志高,李检龙,周维奎,等.专家系统技术在含油气性评价中的应用[J].天然气地球科学,1996,7(5):21-28.
[14]陈述彭,岳天祥,励惠国.地学信息图谱研究及其应用地理研究[J].2000,19(4):381-394.
[15]程三友.中国东北地区区域构造特征与中新生代盆地演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
[16]常立海,王晓勇,王献忠,等.大兴安岭北部漠河逆冲推覆构造的特征及演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版增刊).2007,37(4):12-17.
[17]Craig H J.1992.Variations across and along a major continental rifts: an interdisplinary study of the Basin and Range province Western USA , Tectonophysics, 213:57-96
[18]邓晋福.中国大陆根柱构造—大陆动力学的钥匙[J].北京:地质出版社,1996.111-102.
[19]D.D.赖斯.油气评价方法与应用[M].翟光明等译.北京:石油工业出版社,1992:1-30.
[20]Dow W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemican Explaration,1977.
[21]D.Garcia-castellanos,Numerical modeling of foreland basin formation a program relating thrustingflexure sediment geometry and lithosphere rheology[J].Computers & Geosciences, 1998, 23(9): 993-1003.
[22] Day A., Talaat K., Hoffman S. Reservoir characterization of a stratigraphically and structurally complex Gulf of Suez oil field using three-dimensional modeling and GIS techniques. Geographic information systems in petroleum exploration and development [J]. AAPG, 2000, 4:205-212.
[23]Dickinson W R. Basin geodynamics. Basin research,1993,5:195-196.
[24]付小东,张金区,王云鹏.基于网格与GIS的油气资源空间分布与定量评价系统及其应用[J].地质科技情报,2006,25(5):69-74.
[25]方祖康,张树林,陈章明.汤源及方正断陷与吉林岔路河断陷的生烃条件对比[J].大庆石油学院学报.1992,16(4):15-18.
[26]冯昌寿.延吉盆地下白垩统铜佛寺组、大拉子组沉积与油气特征[J].吉林地质,2002,21(3):33-54.
[27]冯子辉,宗瑞,王雪.大杨树盆地原油显示及其地球化学特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2):33-35.
[28]樊嵛.孙吴嘉荫盆地太平林场组源岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境研究[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2006.
[29]郭占谦,魏魁生,叶淑芬.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):51-58.
[30]郭少斌,刘招君,刘万诛,等.应用特征分析法预测松辽盆地扶余油层有利勘探区[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):158-163.
[31]郭少斌,朱建伟,陶青龙.应用模糊评判法预测延吉盆地含油气有利勘探区[J].长春地质学院学报,1994,24(3):322-326.
[32]郭秋麟,米石云,石广仁等.盆地模拟原理方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.
[33]郭秋麟,米石云,李阿梅.计算区带油气聚散量的物质平衡方法[J].河南石油,1996,10(4):1-7.
[34]高名修.中国东部盆地体系与美国西部盆地山脉构造对比及其成因机制探讨.见:朱夏主编.中国中、新生代盆地构造和演化.北京:科学出版社,1983,65～77.
[35]葛文春,吴福元,张吉衡.大兴安岭中部乌兰浩特地区中生代花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].岩石学报,2005,021(03):749-761.
[36]郭秋麟,翟光明,石广仁.改进的区带综合评价模型及其实现方法[J].石油学报.2004,25(2):7-18.
[37]葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义[J].地质科学,1998, 33(2): 129-139.
[38]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1993.
[39]胡朝元.渤海湾盆地的形成机理与分布特点新议[J].石油实验地质,1982,4(3):161-167.
[40]胡素云,柳广第,李剑.区带地质评价参数体系与参数分级标准[J].石油学报.2005,26(1):74-79.
[41]和钟铧,刘招君,陈秀艳.黑龙江省东部残留盆地群早白垩世沉积相特征及演化[J].古地理学报.2008,10(2):152-158.
[42]黄旭楠,傅振华,包世界,等.地质信息综合评价法预测塔里木盆地油气分布[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):25-29.
[43]何星,杨建国,李映雁.依—舒地堑方正断陷古近系构造演化与沉积相带展布特征[J]中国地质,2008,35(5):902-910.
[44]Hood K C., South B C., Walton F D., Baldwin O D., Burroughs W A. Use of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrocarbon Resource Assessment and Opportunity Analysis. Geographicinformation systems in petroleum exploration and development [J]. AAPG, 2000, 4:173-186.
[45]胡志方,马义忠,乔桂林,三江盆地石油地质条件与勘探前景[J].河南石油.2006,20(1):1-4.
[46]Ingersoll R V. Tectonics of sedimentary basins.Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 1988, 100: 1704-1719.
[47]吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1988.
[48]金之钧,施比伊曼.石油与天然气定量评价的体积统计法[J].地质科技情报,1992,11(1):91-94.
[49]金之钧,张金川.油气资源评价方法的基本原则[J].石油学报,2002,23(1),19-23.
[50]贾承造,孙岩.塔里木地区油气构造的复合关系[J].地质力学学报,1996,2(3):63-64.
[51]姜德录,白云,卢造勋.中朝地台东北缘及其邻区软流圈分布特征与构造运动的关系[J].中国地震,2000,16(1):14-21.
[52]Jorge F.R,Petroleum generation and accumulation in the Golfo San Jorge Basin,Argentina: a basin modeling study[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2001, 18: 995-1028.
[53]Katz B J,Pheifer R N, Schunk D J. Interpretation of discontinuous vitrinite reflectance profiles[J].AAPG,1988,72(8):926-931.
[54]Kirillova, G.L. Comparative characteristics of intracontinental rift basins of East Asia: Songliao and Amur-Zeya[J]. Geology of the Pacific Ocean, 1995, 11: 909-935.
[55]Kirillova G, L. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia: paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003, 20: 385-397.
[56]Kirillova, G.L. Cretaceous tectonics and geological environments in East Russia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 2003, 20: 967-977.
[57]辽宁省地质矿产局.辽宁省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1989.
[58]李德生.渤海湾盆地构造特征[J].石油学报,1980,1(1):7-20.
[59]李思田.断陷盆地分析和煤积聚规律[M].北京:地质出版社,1988:324.
[60]李思田,路凤香,林畅松.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化和动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:18-23.
[61]李忠权,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选[R],成都理工大学,2003.
[62]李树森,王川.对圈闭油气资源评价专家系统的认识[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(3):187-192.
[63]李艳春,王东坡等.应用GIS技术进行油气资源评价的探讨[J].世界地质,1998,17(3):49-53.
[64]李锦轶,和政军,莫申国,Sorokin A.大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报,2004,23(2):120-129.
[65]李少华,许月明,刘学锋.基于GIS的储层综合评价[J].地理空间信息,2006,20(4):17-19.
[66]李志安,施龙,高春文.海拉尔盆地地幔热流的演化特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1996,15(3): 10-13.
[67]李志安.大地构造与成矿学[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 1995,19(2):104-112.
[68]李舟波著.地球物理测井数据处理与综合解释[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2003:58-72.
[69]陆克政.胶莱盆地的形成和演化[J].山东东营:石油大学出版社,1994.167.
[70]吕延防,万军,刘江涛,沙子萱.用灰色理论预测齐家—古龙凹陷中心线以西油气储量分布[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38(5):425-472.
[71]刘瑞林,马在田.神经网络在油气评价和预测方面的研究现状[J].地球物理学进展,1995,10(2):76-83.
[72]刘立,等.大庆探区外围相关盆地群油气资源潜力及油气分布规律[R],吉林大学,2007.
[73]刘宝明,吴进民.南海南部新生代沉积盆地的油气资源评价[J].海洋地质,1995,(3):32-44.
[74]刘学锋. GIS辅助油气勘探决策支持研究[D].武汉大学,2004.
[75]刘世翔.基于GIS与含油气系统的油气资源评价方法研究[J]吉林:吉林大学,2008.
[76]刘招君,陈秀艳.虎林盆地北部凹陷中、新生代碎屑岩源区构造背景与物源区分析[J].世界地质,2007,26(1):15-19.
[77]刘招君等.大庆探区外围中、新生代相关盆地群沉积充填特征及成盆规律[R],吉林大学,2007.
[78]刘光鼎.中国大陆构造格架的动力学演化[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京),2007,14(3):39-46.
[79]刘晓祥,刘池阳,赵重远.盆地后期改造阶段与应力场演化[J].石油与天然气地质1999,20(3):198-202.
[80]刘文龙.大庆探区外围盆地构造演化与油气资源赋存方式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1): 23-26.
[81]刘招君,董清水,何玉平.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区晚白垩世坳陷盆地坡折带研究[J]吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):170-176.
[82]刘池洋.叠合盆地特征及油气赋存条件[J].石油学报.2007,28(1):1-6.
[83]刘江梅,方旭,黄厚宽.基于GIS技术的油气勘探数据库应用与管理系统[J].石油地球物理勘探.1999,34(增刊):142-148.
[84]刘学锋,孟令奎,赵春宇,等.基于GIS的盆地古构造重建方法研究[J].武汉大学学报,2003,28(2):198-207.
[85]刘会纺,杨子荣,滕玉洪等.陆家堡凹陷煤层气成藏地质条件及有利勘探区[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(3):299-301.
[86]刘云武,唐振国,刘文龙.三江盆地演化特征与油气勘探方向[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2006,28(2):1-5.
[87]龙胜祥.松辽盆地十屋-德惠地区天然气资源评价[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):247-250.
[88]林强,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义[J].地质科学,1998,33(2): 129-139.
[89]林峰,文丽.盆地早期油气资源评价中的勘探层方法[J].海洋地质研动态,1997,6,4-6.
[90]罗群,卢宏,刘银河.梨树凹陷断裂特征及对油气的控制[J].大庆石油学院学报1996,20(3):6-10.
[91]罗群,白新华.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):247-251.
[92]雷怀玉.石油勘探和资源评价系统在元宝山凹陷的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1997,16(2): 10-13.
[93]Lawrence J D,John H S.The evolution and use of discoveryprocess models at the U.S.geological survey[J].APPG Bulletin,1993,77(3):467-478.
[94]Lee P J,Wang P C C.Evaluation of petroleum resources from poolsize distribution [A].In:Rice D n Oil and gas assessment:Meth—ods and applications[c].AAPG Studies in Geology No.21,1986:33-42.
[95]Liu Yi-Qun, Zhou Ding-wu ,Li Tao-hong.A discussion on the boundary between diagensis and metamorphism with reference to zeolite facies[J].The Island Arc, 1993,1(4):262-272.
[96]Liu Shaofeng. The coupling mechanism of basin and orogen in the western Ordos Basin and adjacent regions of China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 1998, 16(4): 369-383.
[97]Markevitch, v.s. Palynological Zonation of the Continental Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary of Eastern Russia[J]. Cretaceous Research, 1994, 15: 165-177.
[98]马小刚,王东坡,薛林福.三江盆地绥滨坳陷构造特征及其与油气的关系[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(1):46-60.
[99]马金苹.大庆探区外围东部盆地群油气远景评价[D].吉林:吉林大学地球科学学院,2008.
[100]马金龙,张宝权.汤原断陷构造沉积特征与油气成藏分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3): 220-224.
[101]马醒华,杨振宇.中国三大地块的碰撞拼合与古欧亚大陆的重建[J].地球物理学报,1993,36(4): 476-486.
[102]马杏垣.国际“岩石圈动力学和演化”规划简介[J].地质论评,1981,27(1):87-88.
[103]孟庆龙.大庆探区外围东部主要盆地数值模拟及其地质意义研究[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2007.
[104]Magara K. Thickness of removed sediments paleoprepressure and paleotemperature southwestern part of Western Canada Basin [J].AAPG,1976.
[105]Otis R M., and Nahum Schneideramn. A process for evaluating exploration prospects [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(7):1087-1108.
[106]内蒙古自治区地质矿产局.内蒙古自治区区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1993.
[107]谯汉生,牛嘉玉,王明明.中国东部深部层系反向断层遮挡聚油原理与勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(6):10-13.
[108]钱祥麟.伸展构造研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.32～35.
[109]齐景顺,张吉光,杨明杰.灰色关联分析法在油气勘探早期构造圈闭评价中的应用[J].资源调查与评价,2003,20(5):1-4.
[110]郄瑞卿,薛林福等.SOFM储层综合评价及其在延吉盆地的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地学版),2009,39(1):168-174.
[111]齐玉林,李景坤,徐喜庆等.大杨树盆地杨参1井烃源岩评价及油源对比[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2003,22 (1):13-14.
[112]秦建中,金聚畅,刘宝泉.海相不同类型烃源岩有机质丰度热演化规律[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):177-184.
[113]庞雄奇,金之钧,姜振学.叠合盆地油气资源评价问题及其研究意义石[J].油勘探与开发.2002,29(1):10-13.
[114]Perrodon A. Geodynamigue petroliere,Genese et repartition desgisements hydrocarboures[C]. Masson, Elf-Aquitaint,Mem.5,1980.
[115]樊馥,高福红,刘立.孙吴—嘉荫盆地上白垩统太平林场组烃源岩特征及评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版).2007,37(5):920-942.
[116]冉启全,李士伦.模糊神经网络及其在储集层油气评价中的应用[J].钻采工艺.1997,20(1):32-36.
[117]任纪舜,陈廷愚,牛宝贵.中国东部及邻区大陆岩石圈的构造演化及成矿.北京:科学出版社,1990.
[118]任纪舜,王作勋,陈廷愚,等.从全球看中国大陆构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明.北京:地质出版社,1999.
[119]任建业,李思田,焦贵浩.二连断陷盆地群伸展构造系统及其发育的深部背景[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1998,23(6):567-572
[120] Roy K J., Procter R M., and McCrossan R G. Hydrocarbon assessment using subjective probability:Probability methods in oil exploration [J]. AAPG Research Conference, 1975(8):56-60.
[121]Roland Schegg,Migration and accumulation of hydrocarbons in the Swiss Molasse Basin implications of a 2D basin modeling study[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1999,16:511-531.
[122]Renato M D.1993.Geometry of the hanging wall above a system of listic normal faults-a numerical solution. the American association petroleum geologists bulletin, 77(11): 1839-1859.
[123]Renato M D.1993.Geometry of the hanging wall above a system of listic normal faults- a numerical solution, the American association petroleum geologists bulletin,77(11):1839-1859.
[124]Ro H E, Faleide J I.1992. A stretching model for the Olso Rift.Tectonophysics,208:P19-36.
[125]Rowan M G, Kligfield R.1989. Cross section restoration and balancing as aid to seismic interpretation in extension terrane. Am Assoc petroleum Geologists Bull,73(8):954-957.
[126]宋子齐,杨立雷,王宏.灰色系统储层流动单元综合评价方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007, 26(3):77-81.
[127]施冬,陈军,朱庆.基于GIS的空间分析功能进行油气储层综合评价[J].物探化探计算技术,2004, 2(26):149-154.
[128]孙会君,王新华.应用人工神经网络确定评价指标的权重[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版).2001,20(3):57-68.
[129]商平,王宇林,张振文.内蒙古平庄─元宝山盆地群晚中生代地层[J].地层学杂志,1994, 18(4):275-281.
[130]石广仁,郭秋麟,米石云等.盆地综合模拟系统BASIMS[J].石油学报,1996,17(1):1-9.
[131]Schuenemeyer J H., and Drew L J. A forecast of undiscovered oil and gas in the Frio Strand Plain Trend:the unfolding of a very large exploration play [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75(6):1107-1115.
[132]Schlische R W, Olsen P E.1990.Quantitive filling model for continental extension basins with application to early mesozoic rifts of eastern north America. Planetary Science Letters,114: 397-416.
[133]邵济安,唐克东.中国东北地体与东北亚大陆边缘演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1995.
[134]田敏,谢贤平,侯江,等.神经网络在矿业工程中的若干应用进展[J].采矿技术,2008.8(4):15-44.
[135]佟卉,李桂范,向淑敏,等.中生代大杨树盆地演化及地球动力学背景分析[J].大庆石油学院学报,2008,32(3):111-113.
[136]汤良杰,金之钧.贾承造.叠合盆地构造解析几点思考[J].石油实验地质2001,23(3):252-258.
[137]唐中实,黄俊峰,尹平,等.地理信息系统(上卷)-原理与技术(第二版)[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004:50-80.
[138]王世辉,王立民.兴安岭盆地群成盆机制及含油气远景评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001, 20(5):5-6.
[139]王冬艳,许文良,冯宏.辽西中生代晚期岩石圈地幔的性质:来自玄武岩和地幔捕虏体的证据[J].吉林大学学报,2002,32(4):320-324.
[140]王钧.中国地温分布的基车特征[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[141]王微,许文良,纪伟强.辽东中生代晚期和古近纪玄武岩及深源捕虏晶[J].高校地质学报, 2006,12(1):30-40.
[142]王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义,等.东北地区区域地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1997:76-113.
[143]王玉净.中国西南地区古生代放射虫硅岩地层-一个潜在的油气勘探目标[J].微体古生物学报,24(3):243-246.
[144]王玉净,杨群.中国石炭—二叠纪放射虫化石带及古生物地理学意义[J]微体古生物学报,2007, 24 (4) :337– 345.
[145]王平在,文武,王青海,等.汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料)1995,(23):226-236
[146]王瑞飞,王永宏,王永平.灰色理论在辽河油田滩海区储层评价中的应用[J].西安石油学院学报, 2003,18(6):36-38.
[147]汪新文.中国东北地区中-新生代盆地构造演化与油气关系[M].北京:地质出版社,2007.
[148]王辉,常旭,黄鼎成.利用GIS技术进行油气资源综合评价[J].地球物理学进展,1997,12(4): 36-44.
[149]王旖旎.孙武嘉荫盆地地层序列及盆地演化[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2006.
[150]魏志平,毛超林,孙岩,等.松辽盆地南部大情字井地区油气成藏过程分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(3):11-12.
[151]吴河勇,王世辉,杨建国,等.大庆外围盆地勘探潜力[J].石油地质,2004,23(4):23-30.
[152]吴河勇,刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):23-26.
[153]吴河勇,辛仁臣,杨建国.漠河盆地中侏罗统沉积演化及含油气远景[J].石油实验地质,2003, 25(2):116-121.
[154]吴河勇,杨建国,黄清华,等.漠河盆地中生代地层层序及时代[J].地层学杂志, 2003,27(3):193- 198.
[155]吴立真,王伟元,戎权令.油气资源评价专家系统初步设计,油气资源评价研究丛书之六.油气资源评价方法研究与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988,219-225.
[156]武守诚.油气资源评价与系统研究[J].石油学报,1989,10(4):2-10.
[157]Wang Hongzhen and Mo Xuanxue.An outline of the tectonic evolution of China: Episodes,1995,18:6-16.
[158]Watts A B, Ryan W B F, Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins [J]. Tectonophysics,1976,36 (1): 25- 44.
[159]WangGuiliang. The system of extensional structures developed in the west of Shandong province ,China. Tectonophysics ,1994,238:217-228.
[160]Weeks L G. Concerning estimates of potential petroleum reserves [J]. AAPG, Bulletin 1950, 34(8):1947-1953.
[161]White D A. Geological risking quide for prospects and play [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, 77(12):2048-2091.
[162]Wu F Y,Sun D Y,Li H M,et al. The Nature of Beneath the Songliao Basin in NE china: Geochemical and Isotopic Constraints. Phys, Chem. Earth(A), 2001,26(9-10):793-803.
[163]William C R, Dale E W.1995.Insights from stratigraphic modeling: Mud-limited versus sand-limited deposition systems,AAPG,79(2),231-258
[164]夏邦栋.下扬子区中生代走滑活动带初析[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(3):193-200.
[165]薛林福等.储层沉积微相带自动跟踪方法[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):88-92.
[166]薛林福,潘保芝,王东坡,等.大尺度盆地计算机定量分析方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
[167]谢青云,王京,刘志森.基于GIS的盆地综合排队方法及其在云南省的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(5):33-36.
[168]肖乾华,刘晓峰,孙素青等.陆家堡凹陷上侏罗统层序地层研究[J].河南石油,1999,11(6):10-13.
[169]谢鸣谦.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东部及相邻区的大地构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[170]许文良,孙德有,尹秀英.大兴安岭海西期造山带的演化:来自花岗质岩石的证据[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(4):320-323.
[171]许岩,刘立,赵羽君.延吉盆地含油气系统与勘探前景[J].吉林大学学报,004,34(2):228-230.
[172]云金表,罗笃清,李玉喜.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群构造演化与成油关系探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(6):41-45.
[173]云金表,殷进垠,金之钧.松辽盆地深部地质特征及其盆地动力学演化[J].地震地质,2003, 25(4):595-604.
[174]杨惠心,李朋武,禹惠民.中国东北地区主要地体古地磁学研究[J].长春科技大学学报, 1999,28(2):203-205.
[175]杨绍芳.泛三江盆地成藏系统分析[J].石油天然气学报,2005,27(4):413-415.
[176]杨建国,吴河勇,刘俊来.大庆探区外围盆地中,新生代地层对比及四大勘探层系[J].地质通报,2006,25(9-10):1089-1093.
[177]杨丽娜,解国军.油气资源丰度预测的人工神经网络方法[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(1):55-58.
[178]Yukler M A. How essential is quantitative basin modeling in petroleum exploration[J]. 7th Bjannual Petroleum Congress of Turkey Proc,1987.
[179]杨继良.大庆探区油气藏勘探的新进展[J].大庆右油地质与开发,1989,8(3):19-34
[180]杨建国,赵传本,张海桥.东北地区三江盆地海陆相侏罗—白垩系层序[A].见:第三届全国地层会议论文集[C].北京:地质出版社,2000.270- 274.
[181]杨建国,黄清华,吴朝东,等.黑龙江汤原断陷第三纪地层层序及时代[J].地层学杂志, 2004, 28(2) : 168- 172.
[182]叶加仁,陆明德.盆地地史模拟述评[J].地质科技情报,1995,14 (2):45-50.
[183]殷长建,彭玉鲸,靳克.中国东北东部中生代火山活动与泛太平洋板块[J].中国区域地质,2008,19(3):304-311.
[184]张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J].辽宁地质,1998,(2):91-96.
[185]张炯飞,权恒,武广,等.东北地区中生代火山岩形成的构造环境[J].贵金属地质,2000,9(1):34-38.
[186]张新荣.东北地区晚全新世泥炭沉积的植硅体气候指示意义研究[D].吉林:吉林大学地球科学学院,2008.
[187]张旭东.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群成盆机制及油气远景[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院, 2007.
[188]张亚明,王丽华,高常青.平庄盆地构造特征及演化[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2002,21(4): 483-485.
[189]张宝权,马金龙.汤原断陷构造沉积特征与油气成藏分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3):220-224
[190]张贻侠,孙运生,张兴洲,等.中国满洲里一绥芬河地学断面1:1000000说明书.北京地质出版社,1998.
[191]张家声.造山带后伸展构造研究的最新进展[J].地学前缘,1995,2(1-2):67-83.
[192]张雷,刘招君,和钟铧.孙吴嘉荫盆地白垩系淘淇河组太平林场组砂岩主量元素的地球化学特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质.2008,28(2)100-106.
[193]张厚福,方朝亮,高先志,等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[194]张勤运.中国东北部那丹暗达岭地区三叠纪和侏罗纪的放射虫动物群[J].沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊1990(21).
[195]张勤运.那丹哈达地体放射虫动物群的生态特征[J].沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊第1号,地震出版杜.1992.
[196]周永胜,王东坡,杨丙中.伊舒地堑的构造一沉积演化及其聚油条件[J].岩相古地理,1993, 13(5):1-15.
[197]赵文智,李建忠.基底断裂对松辽南部油气聚集的控制作用[J].石油.2004,25(4):1-6.
[198]赵文智,胡素云,沈成喜,等.油气资源评价方法研究新进展[J].石油学报,2005,26(3):25-29.赵文智,李建忠.基底断裂对松辽南部油气聚集的控制作用[J].石油学.2004,25(4):1-6.
[199]赵旭东.预测含油气有利地带的多种信息叠合评价法[M].北京石油勘探开发科学研究院,1985.
[200]赵旭东.石油数学地质概论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992:101-115.
[201]赵旭东.石油资源定量评价[M].北京:地质出版社,1988:224-245.
[202]赵传本,杨建国,李强.黑龙江东部鸡西群研究新进展[A].见:第三届全国地层会议论文集[C].北京:地质出版社, 2000.304-307.
[203]赵鹏大,吕新彪.定量成矿预测的人工神经网络模型[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报.1998, 23(6):621-623.
[204]赵利华,云金表,方德庆.松辽盆地北部构造沉降史及波动旋回性分析[J].大庆石油学院学报第,2004,28(4):99-118.
[205]赵武锋,郭亚军.完达山地区中三叠一早侏罗世放射虫组合[J].黑龙江地质,1995,6(2):13-16.
[206]赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景等.松辽盆地东南缘中生代火山岩及其盆地形成的构造背景[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1996,21(4):421-427.
[207]赵霞,于兴河,易荣龙.三江盆地构造演化分析[J].内蒙古石油化工.2007,5(4):310-313.
[208]钟延秋.依—舒地堑汤原断陷构造演化及其对成藏的控制作用[D].中国地质大学能源地质工程,2006.
[209]朱夏.关于盆地研究的几点意见[J] .石油实验地质,1980,5:19-24.
[2]Aoyagi K.Palaeotemperature analysis by authigenic minerals and its application to petroleum exploration[J].AAPG,1984,68:903-913.
[3]Barker R A., Gehman H M., James W R., and White D A. Geologic field number and size assessments of oil and gas plays [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1984, 68(4):426-432.
[4] Barberi F.1982.Chemical aspects of rift maganticsm. In: Pal mason G, ed. Continental and Oceanic Rifts,223-258.
[5] Barr D. 1987. Structural / strition graphic models for extensional basins of half graben type: Journal of Structural Geology, 9(4): 491-500.
[6] Bordine J H, Stecker M S, Watts A B.1981.Observations of flexure and the rheology of the oceanic lithosphere. J Geo phys Res, 86:3695-3707.
[7] Braun J, Beau mount C.1989.A physical explanation of the relation between flank uplifts and breakup unconformity at rifted continental margins. Geology,17:760-764.
[8] Bridge J S, Diemer J A.1983.Quantitative interpretation of an evolving ancient river system. Sedimentlogy,30:599-623.
[9]Busby C J,Ingeroll R V. Tectonic of sedimentary basins.Blackwell Science,1995,331-393.
[10]陈发景.塔北地区变形样式及其分布规律[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(6):755-768.
[11]陈发景.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1996,21 (4):366～372.
[12]陈发景.中国中、新生代含油气盆地成因类型、构造体系及地球动力学模式[J].现代地质,1997,11(4):410-422.
[13]陈志高,李检龙,周维奎,等.专家系统技术在含油气性评价中的应用[J].天然气地球科学,1996,7(5):21-28.
[14]陈述彭,岳天祥,励惠国.地学信息图谱研究及其应用地理研究[J].2000,19(4):381-394.
[15]程三友.中国东北地区区域构造特征与中新生代盆地演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
[16]常立海,王晓勇,王献忠,等.大兴安岭北部漠河逆冲推覆构造的特征及演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版增刊).2007,37(4):12-17.
[17]Craig H J.1992.Variations across and along a major continental rifts: an interdisplinary study of the Basin and Range province Western USA , Tectonophysics, 213:57-96
[18]邓晋福.中国大陆根柱构造—大陆动力学的钥匙[J].北京:地质出版社,1996.111-102.
[19]D.D.赖斯.油气评价方法与应用[M].翟光明等译.北京:石油工业出版社,1992:1-30.
[20]Dow W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemican Explaration,1977.
[21]D.Garcia-castellanos,Numerical modeling of foreland basin formation a program relating thrustingflexure sediment geometry and lithosphere rheology[J].Computers & Geosciences, 1998, 23(9): 993-1003.
[22] Day A., Talaat K., Hoffman S. Reservoir characterization of a stratigraphically and structurally complex Gulf of Suez oil field using three-dimensional modeling and GIS techniques. Geographic information systems in petroleum exploration and development [J]. AAPG, 2000, 4:205-212.
[23]Dickinson W R. Basin geodynamics. Basin research,1993,5:195-196.
[24]付小东,张金区,王云鹏.基于网格与GIS的油气资源空间分布与定量评价系统及其应用[J].地质科技情报,2006,25(5):69-74.
[25]方祖康,张树林,陈章明.汤源及方正断陷与吉林岔路河断陷的生烃条件对比[J].大庆石油学院学报.1992,16(4):15-18.
[26]冯昌寿.延吉盆地下白垩统铜佛寺组、大拉子组沉积与油气特征[J].吉林地质,2002,21(3):33-54.
[27]冯子辉,宗瑞,王雪.大杨树盆地原油显示及其地球化学特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2):33-35.
[28]樊嵛.孙吴嘉荫盆地太平林场组源岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境研究[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2006.
[29]郭占谦,魏魁生,叶淑芬.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):51-58.
[30]郭少斌,刘招君,刘万诛,等.应用特征分析法预测松辽盆地扶余油层有利勘探区[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):158-163.
[31]郭少斌,朱建伟,陶青龙.应用模糊评判法预测延吉盆地含油气有利勘探区[J].长春地质学院学报,1994,24(3):322-326.
[32]郭秋麟,米石云,石广仁等.盆地模拟原理方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.
[33]郭秋麟,米石云,李阿梅.计算区带油气聚散量的物质平衡方法[J].河南石油,1996,10(4):1-7.
[34]高名修.中国东部盆地体系与美国西部盆地山脉构造对比及其成因机制探讨.见:朱夏主编.中国中、新生代盆地构造和演化.北京:科学出版社,1983,65～77.
[35]葛文春,吴福元,张吉衡.大兴安岭中部乌兰浩特地区中生代花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].岩石学报,2005,021(03):749-761.
[36]郭秋麟,翟光明,石广仁.改进的区带综合评价模型及其实现方法[J].石油学报.2004,25(2):7-18.
[37]葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义[J].地质科学,1998, 33(2): 129-139.
[38]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1993.
[39]胡朝元.渤海湾盆地的形成机理与分布特点新议[J].石油实验地质,1982,4(3):161-167.
[40]胡素云,柳广第,李剑.区带地质评价参数体系与参数分级标准[J].石油学报.2005,26(1):74-79.
[41]和钟铧,刘招君,陈秀艳.黑龙江省东部残留盆地群早白垩世沉积相特征及演化[J].古地理学报.2008,10(2):152-158.
[42]黄旭楠,傅振华,包世界,等.地质信息综合评价法预测塔里木盆地油气分布[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):25-29.
[43]何星,杨建国,李映雁.依—舒地堑方正断陷古近系构造演化与沉积相带展布特征[J]中国地质,2008,35(5):902-910.
[44]Hood K C., South B C., Walton F D., Baldwin O D., Burroughs W A. Use of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrocarbon Resource Assessment and Opportunity Analysis. Geographicinformation systems in petroleum exploration and development [J]. AAPG, 2000, 4:173-186.
[45]胡志方,马义忠,乔桂林,三江盆地石油地质条件与勘探前景[J].河南石油.2006,20(1):1-4.
[46]Ingersoll R V. Tectonics of sedimentary basins.Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 1988, 100: 1704-1719.
[47]吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1988.
[48]金之钧,施比伊曼.石油与天然气定量评价的体积统计法[J].地质科技情报,1992,11(1):91-94.
[49]金之钧,张金川.油气资源评价方法的基本原则[J].石油学报,2002,23(1),19-23.
[50]贾承造,孙岩.塔里木地区油气构造的复合关系[J].地质力学学报,1996,2(3):63-64.
[51]姜德录,白云,卢造勋.中朝地台东北缘及其邻区软流圈分布特征与构造运动的关系[J].中国地震,2000,16(1):14-21.
[52]Jorge F.R,Petroleum generation and accumulation in the Golfo San Jorge Basin,Argentina: a basin modeling study[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2001, 18: 995-1028.
[53]Katz B J,Pheifer R N, Schunk D J. Interpretation of discontinuous vitrinite reflectance profiles[J].AAPG,1988,72(8):926-931.
[54]Kirillova, G.L. Comparative characteristics of intracontinental rift basins of East Asia: Songliao and Amur-Zeya[J]. Geology of the Pacific Ocean, 1995, 11: 909-935.
[55]Kirillova G, L. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia: paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003, 20: 385-397.
[56]Kirillova, G.L. Cretaceous tectonics and geological environments in East Russia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 2003, 20: 967-977.
[57]辽宁省地质矿产局.辽宁省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1989.
[58]李德生.渤海湾盆地构造特征[J].石油学报,1980,1(1):7-20.
[59]李思田.断陷盆地分析和煤积聚规律[M].北京:地质出版社,1988:324.
[60]李思田,路凤香,林畅松.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化和动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:18-23.
[61]李忠权,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选[R],成都理工大学,2003.
[62]李树森,王川.对圈闭油气资源评价专家系统的认识[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(3):187-192.
[63]李艳春,王东坡等.应用GIS技术进行油气资源评价的探讨[J].世界地质,1998,17(3):49-53.
[64]李锦轶,和政军,莫申国,Sorokin A.大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报,2004,23(2):120-129.
[65]李少华,许月明,刘学锋.基于GIS的储层综合评价[J].地理空间信息,2006,20(4):17-19.
[66]李志安,施龙,高春文.海拉尔盆地地幔热流的演化特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1996,15(3): 10-13.
[67]李志安.大地构造与成矿学[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 1995,19(2):104-112.
[68]李舟波著.地球物理测井数据处理与综合解释[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2003:58-72.
[69]陆克政.胶莱盆地的形成和演化[J].山东东营:石油大学出版社,1994.167.
[70]吕延防,万军,刘江涛,沙子萱.用灰色理论预测齐家—古龙凹陷中心线以西油气储量分布[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38(5):425-472.
[71]刘瑞林,马在田.神经网络在油气评价和预测方面的研究现状[J].地球物理学进展,1995,10(2):76-83.
[72]刘立,等.大庆探区外围相关盆地群油气资源潜力及油气分布规律[R],吉林大学,2007.
[73]刘宝明,吴进民.南海南部新生代沉积盆地的油气资源评价[J].海洋地质,1995,(3):32-44.
[74]刘学锋. GIS辅助油气勘探决策支持研究[D].武汉大学,2004.
[75]刘世翔.基于GIS与含油气系统的油气资源评价方法研究[J]吉林:吉林大学,2008.
[76]刘招君,陈秀艳.虎林盆地北部凹陷中、新生代碎屑岩源区构造背景与物源区分析[J].世界地质,2007,26(1):15-19.
[77]刘招君等.大庆探区外围中、新生代相关盆地群沉积充填特征及成盆规律[R],吉林大学,2007.
[78]刘光鼎.中国大陆构造格架的动力学演化[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京),2007,14(3):39-46.
[79]刘晓祥,刘池阳,赵重远.盆地后期改造阶段与应力场演化[J].石油与天然气地质1999,20(3):198-202.
[80]刘文龙.大庆探区外围盆地构造演化与油气资源赋存方式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1): 23-26.
[81]刘招君,董清水,何玉平.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区晚白垩世坳陷盆地坡折带研究[J]吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):170-176.
[82]刘池洋.叠合盆地特征及油气赋存条件[J].石油学报.2007,28(1):1-6.
[83]刘江梅,方旭,黄厚宽.基于GIS技术的油气勘探数据库应用与管理系统[J].石油地球物理勘探.1999,34(增刊):142-148.
[84]刘学锋,孟令奎,赵春宇,等.基于GIS的盆地古构造重建方法研究[J].武汉大学学报,2003,28(2):198-207.
[85]刘会纺,杨子荣,滕玉洪等.陆家堡凹陷煤层气成藏地质条件及有利勘探区[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(3):299-301.
[86]刘云武,唐振国,刘文龙.三江盆地演化特征与油气勘探方向[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2006,28(2):1-5.
[87]龙胜祥.松辽盆地十屋-德惠地区天然气资源评价[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):247-250.
[88]林强,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义[J].地质科学,1998,33(2): 129-139.
[89]林峰,文丽.盆地早期油气资源评价中的勘探层方法[J].海洋地质研动态,1997,6,4-6.
[90]罗群,卢宏,刘银河.梨树凹陷断裂特征及对油气的控制[J].大庆石油学院学报1996,20(3):6-10.
[91]罗群,白新华.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):247-251.
[92]雷怀玉.石油勘探和资源评价系统在元宝山凹陷的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1997,16(2): 10-13.
[93]Lawrence J D,John H S.The evolution and use of discoveryprocess models at the U.S.geological survey[J].APPG Bulletin,1993,77(3):467-478.
[94]Lee P J,Wang P C C.Evaluation of petroleum resources from poolsize distribution [A].In:Rice D n Oil and gas assessment:Meth—ods and applications[c].AAPG Studies in Geology No.21,1986:33-42.
[95]Liu Yi-Qun, Zhou Ding-wu ,Li Tao-hong.A discussion on the boundary between diagensis and metamorphism with reference to zeolite facies[J].The Island Arc, 1993,1(4):262-272.
[96]Liu Shaofeng. The coupling mechanism of basin and orogen in the western Ordos Basin and adjacent regions of China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 1998, 16(4): 369-383.
[97]Markevitch, v.s. Palynological Zonation of the Continental Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary of Eastern Russia[J]. Cretaceous Research, 1994, 15: 165-177.
[98]马小刚,王东坡,薛林福.三江盆地绥滨坳陷构造特征及其与油气的关系[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(1):46-60.
[99]马金苹.大庆探区外围东部盆地群油气远景评价[D].吉林:吉林大学地球科学学院,2008.
[100]马金龙,张宝权.汤原断陷构造沉积特征与油气成藏分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3): 220-224.
[101]马醒华,杨振宇.中国三大地块的碰撞拼合与古欧亚大陆的重建[J].地球物理学报,1993,36(4): 476-486.
[102]马杏垣.国际“岩石圈动力学和演化”规划简介[J].地质论评,1981,27(1):87-88.
[103]孟庆龙.大庆探区外围东部主要盆地数值模拟及其地质意义研究[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2007.
[104]Magara K. Thickness of removed sediments paleoprepressure and paleotemperature southwestern part of Western Canada Basin [J].AAPG,1976.
[105]Otis R M., and Nahum Schneideramn. A process for evaluating exploration prospects [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(7):1087-1108.
[106]内蒙古自治区地质矿产局.内蒙古自治区区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1993.
[107]谯汉生,牛嘉玉,王明明.中国东部深部层系反向断层遮挡聚油原理与勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(6):10-13.
[108]钱祥麟.伸展构造研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.32～35.
[109]齐景顺,张吉光,杨明杰.灰色关联分析法在油气勘探早期构造圈闭评价中的应用[J].资源调查与评价,2003,20(5):1-4.
[110]郄瑞卿,薛林福等.SOFM储层综合评价及其在延吉盆地的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地学版),2009,39(1):168-174.
[111]齐玉林,李景坤,徐喜庆等.大杨树盆地杨参1井烃源岩评价及油源对比[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2003,22 (1):13-14.
[112]秦建中,金聚畅,刘宝泉.海相不同类型烃源岩有机质丰度热演化规律[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):177-184.
[113]庞雄奇,金之钧,姜振学.叠合盆地油气资源评价问题及其研究意义石[J].油勘探与开发.2002,29(1):10-13.
[114]Perrodon A. Geodynamigue petroliere,Genese et repartition desgisements hydrocarboures[C]. Masson, Elf-Aquitaint,Mem.5,1980.
[115]樊馥,高福红,刘立.孙吴—嘉荫盆地上白垩统太平林场组烃源岩特征及评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版).2007,37(5):920-942.
[116]冉启全,李士伦.模糊神经网络及其在储集层油气评价中的应用[J].钻采工艺.1997,20(1):32-36.
[117]任纪舜,陈廷愚,牛宝贵.中国东部及邻区大陆岩石圈的构造演化及成矿.北京:科学出版社,1990.
[118]任纪舜,王作勋,陈廷愚,等.从全球看中国大陆构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明.北京:地质出版社,1999.
[119]任建业,李思田,焦贵浩.二连断陷盆地群伸展构造系统及其发育的深部背景[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1998,23(6):567-572
[120] Roy K J., Procter R M., and McCrossan R G. Hydrocarbon assessment using subjective probability:Probability methods in oil exploration [J]. AAPG Research Conference, 1975(8):56-60.
[121]Roland Schegg,Migration and accumulation of hydrocarbons in the Swiss Molasse Basin implications of a 2D basin modeling study[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1999,16:511-531.
[122]Renato M D.1993.Geometry of the hanging wall above a system of listic normal faults-a numerical solution. the American association petroleum geologists bulletin, 77(11): 1839-1859.
[123]Renato M D.1993.Geometry of the hanging wall above a system of listic normal faults- a numerical solution, the American association petroleum geologists bulletin,77(11):1839-1859.
[124]Ro H E, Faleide J I.1992. A stretching model for the Olso Rift.Tectonophysics,208:P19-36.
[125]Rowan M G, Kligfield R.1989. Cross section restoration and balancing as aid to seismic interpretation in extension terrane. Am Assoc petroleum Geologists Bull,73(8):954-957.
[126]宋子齐,杨立雷,王宏.灰色系统储层流动单元综合评价方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007, 26(3):77-81.
[127]施冬,陈军,朱庆.基于GIS的空间分析功能进行油气储层综合评价[J].物探化探计算技术,2004, 2(26):149-154.
[128]孙会君,王新华.应用人工神经网络确定评价指标的权重[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版).2001,20(3):57-68.
[129]商平,王宇林,张振文.内蒙古平庄─元宝山盆地群晚中生代地层[J].地层学杂志,1994, 18(4):275-281.
[130]石广仁,郭秋麟,米石云等.盆地综合模拟系统BASIMS[J].石油学报,1996,17(1):1-9.
[131]Schuenemeyer J H., and Drew L J. A forecast of undiscovered oil and gas in the Frio Strand Plain Trend:the unfolding of a very large exploration play [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75(6):1107-1115.
[132]Schlische R W, Olsen P E.1990.Quantitive filling model for continental extension basins with application to early mesozoic rifts of eastern north America. Planetary Science Letters,114: 397-416.
[133]邵济安,唐克东.中国东北地体与东北亚大陆边缘演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1995.
[134]田敏,谢贤平,侯江,等.神经网络在矿业工程中的若干应用进展[J].采矿技术,2008.8(4):15-44.
[135]佟卉,李桂范,向淑敏,等.中生代大杨树盆地演化及地球动力学背景分析[J].大庆石油学院学报,2008,32(3):111-113.
[136]汤良杰,金之钧.贾承造.叠合盆地构造解析几点思考[J].石油实验地质2001,23(3):252-258.
[137]唐中实,黄俊峰,尹平,等.地理信息系统(上卷)-原理与技术(第二版)[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004:50-80.
[138]王世辉,王立民.兴安岭盆地群成盆机制及含油气远景评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001, 20(5):5-6.
[139]王冬艳,许文良,冯宏.辽西中生代晚期岩石圈地幔的性质:来自玄武岩和地幔捕虏体的证据[J].吉林大学学报,2002,32(4):320-324.
[140]王钧.中国地温分布的基车特征[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[141]王微,许文良,纪伟强.辽东中生代晚期和古近纪玄武岩及深源捕虏晶[J].高校地质学报, 2006,12(1):30-40.
[142]王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义,等.东北地区区域地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1997:76-113.
[143]王玉净.中国西南地区古生代放射虫硅岩地层-一个潜在的油气勘探目标[J].微体古生物学报,24(3):243-246.
[144]王玉净,杨群.中国石炭—二叠纪放射虫化石带及古生物地理学意义[J]微体古生物学报,2007, 24 (4) :337– 345.
[145]王平在,文武,王青海,等.汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.石油地质研究报告集,大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院(内部材料)1995,(23):226-236
[146]王瑞飞,王永宏,王永平.灰色理论在辽河油田滩海区储层评价中的应用[J].西安石油学院学报, 2003,18(6):36-38.
[147]汪新文.中国东北地区中-新生代盆地构造演化与油气关系[M].北京:地质出版社,2007.
[148]王辉,常旭,黄鼎成.利用GIS技术进行油气资源综合评价[J].地球物理学进展,1997,12(4): 36-44.
[149]王旖旎.孙武嘉荫盆地地层序列及盆地演化[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院.2006.
[150]魏志平,毛超林,孙岩,等.松辽盆地南部大情字井地区油气成藏过程分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(3):11-12.
[151]吴河勇,王世辉,杨建国,等.大庆外围盆地勘探潜力[J].石油地质,2004,23(4):23-30.
[152]吴河勇,刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):23-26.
[153]吴河勇,辛仁臣,杨建国.漠河盆地中侏罗统沉积演化及含油气远景[J].石油实验地质,2003, 25(2):116-121.
[154]吴河勇,杨建国,黄清华,等.漠河盆地中生代地层层序及时代[J].地层学杂志, 2003,27(3):193- 198.
[155]吴立真,王伟元,戎权令.油气资源评价专家系统初步设计,油气资源评价研究丛书之六.油气资源评价方法研究与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988,219-225.
[156]武守诚.油气资源评价与系统研究[J].石油学报,1989,10(4):2-10.
[157]Wang Hongzhen and Mo Xuanxue.An outline of the tectonic evolution of China: Episodes,1995,18:6-16.
[158]Watts A B, Ryan W B F, Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins [J]. Tectonophysics,1976,36 (1): 25- 44.
[159]WangGuiliang. The system of extensional structures developed in the west of Shandong province ,China. Tectonophysics ,1994,238:217-228.
[160]Weeks L G. Concerning estimates of potential petroleum reserves [J]. AAPG, Bulletin 1950, 34(8):1947-1953.
[161]White D A. Geological risking quide for prospects and play [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, 77(12):2048-2091.
[162]Wu F Y,Sun D Y,Li H M,et al. The Nature of Beneath the Songliao Basin in NE china: Geochemical and Isotopic Constraints. Phys, Chem. Earth(A), 2001,26(9-10):793-803.
[163]William C R, Dale E W.1995.Insights from stratigraphic modeling: Mud-limited versus sand-limited deposition systems,AAPG,79(2),231-258
[164]夏邦栋.下扬子区中生代走滑活动带初析[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(3):193-200.
[165]薛林福等.储层沉积微相带自动跟踪方法[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):88-92.
[166]薛林福,潘保芝,王东坡,等.大尺度盆地计算机定量分析方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
[167]谢青云,王京,刘志森.基于GIS的盆地综合排队方法及其在云南省的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(5):33-36.
[168]肖乾华,刘晓峰,孙素青等.陆家堡凹陷上侏罗统层序地层研究[J].河南石油,1999,11(6):10-13.
[169]谢鸣谦.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东部及相邻区的大地构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[170]许文良,孙德有,尹秀英.大兴安岭海西期造山带的演化:来自花岗质岩石的证据[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(4):320-323.
[171]许岩,刘立,赵羽君.延吉盆地含油气系统与勘探前景[J].吉林大学学报,004,34(2):228-230.
[172]云金表,罗笃清,李玉喜.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群构造演化与成油关系探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(6):41-45.
[173]云金表,殷进垠,金之钧.松辽盆地深部地质特征及其盆地动力学演化[J].地震地质,2003, 25(4):595-604.
[174]杨惠心,李朋武,禹惠民.中国东北地区主要地体古地磁学研究[J].长春科技大学学报, 1999,28(2):203-205.
[175]杨绍芳.泛三江盆地成藏系统分析[J].石油天然气学报,2005,27(4):413-415.
[176]杨建国,吴河勇,刘俊来.大庆探区外围盆地中,新生代地层对比及四大勘探层系[J].地质通报,2006,25(9-10):1089-1093.
[177]杨丽娜,解国军.油气资源丰度预测的人工神经网络方法[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(1):55-58.
[178]Yukler M A. How essential is quantitative basin modeling in petroleum exploration[J]. 7th Bjannual Petroleum Congress of Turkey Proc,1987.
[179]杨继良.大庆探区油气藏勘探的新进展[J].大庆右油地质与开发,1989,8(3):19-34
[180]杨建国,赵传本,张海桥.东北地区三江盆地海陆相侏罗—白垩系层序[A].见:第三届全国地层会议论文集[C].北京:地质出版社,2000.270- 274.
[181]杨建国,黄清华,吴朝东,等.黑龙江汤原断陷第三纪地层层序及时代[J].地层学杂志, 2004, 28(2) : 168- 172.
[182]叶加仁,陆明德.盆地地史模拟述评[J].地质科技情报,1995,14 (2):45-50.
[183]殷长建,彭玉鲸,靳克.中国东北东部中生代火山活动与泛太平洋板块[J].中国区域地质,2008,19(3):304-311.
[184]张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J].辽宁地质,1998,(2):91-96.
[185]张炯飞,权恒,武广,等.东北地区中生代火山岩形成的构造环境[J].贵金属地质,2000,9(1):34-38.
[186]张新荣.东北地区晚全新世泥炭沉积的植硅体气候指示意义研究[D].吉林:吉林大学地球科学学院,2008.
[187]张旭东.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群成盆机制及油气远景[D].吉林.吉林大学地球科学学院, 2007.
[188]张亚明,王丽华,高常青.平庄盆地构造特征及演化[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2002,21(4): 483-485.
[189]张宝权,马金龙.汤原断陷构造沉积特征与油气成藏分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3):220-224
[190]张贻侠,孙运生,张兴洲,等.中国满洲里一绥芬河地学断面1:1000000说明书.北京地质出版社,1998.
[191]张家声.造山带后伸展构造研究的最新进展[J].地学前缘,1995,2(1-2):67-83.
[192]张雷,刘招君,和钟铧.孙吴嘉荫盆地白垩系淘淇河组太平林场组砂岩主量元素的地球化学特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质.2008,28(2)100-106.
[193]张厚福,方朝亮,高先志,等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[194]张勤运.中国东北部那丹暗达岭地区三叠纪和侏罗纪的放射虫动物群[J].沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊1990(21).
[195]张勤运.那丹哈达地体放射虫动物群的生态特征[J].沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊第1号,地震出版杜.1992.
[196]周永胜,王东坡,杨丙中.伊舒地堑的构造一沉积演化及其聚油条件[J].岩相古地理,1993, 13(5):1-15.
[197]赵文智,李建忠.基底断裂对松辽南部油气聚集的控制作用[J].石油.2004,25(4):1-6.
[198]赵文智,胡素云,沈成喜,等.油气资源评价方法研究新进展[J].石油学报,2005,26(3):25-29.赵文智,李建忠.基底断裂对松辽南部油气聚集的控制作用[J].石油学.2004,25(4):1-6.
[199]赵旭东.预测含油气有利地带的多种信息叠合评价法[M].北京石油勘探开发科学研究院,1985.
[200]赵旭东.石油数学地质概论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992:101-115.
[201]赵旭东.石油资源定量评价[M].北京:地质出版社,1988:224-245.
[202]赵传本,杨建国,李强.黑龙江东部鸡西群研究新进展[A].见:第三届全国地层会议论文集[C].北京:地质出版社, 2000.304-307.
[203]赵鹏大,吕新彪.定量成矿预测的人工神经网络模型[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报.1998, 23(6):621-623.
[204]赵利华,云金表,方德庆.松辽盆地北部构造沉降史及波动旋回性分析[J].大庆石油学院学报第,2004,28(4):99-118.
[205]赵武锋,郭亚军.完达山地区中三叠一早侏罗世放射虫组合[J].黑龙江地质,1995,6(2):13-16.
[206]赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景等.松辽盆地东南缘中生代火山岩及其盆地形成的构造背景[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1996,21(4):421-427.
[207]赵霞,于兴河,易荣龙.三江盆地构造演化分析[J].内蒙古石油化工.2007,5(4):310-313.
[208]钟延秋.依—舒地堑汤原断陷构造演化及其对成藏的控制作用[D].中国地质大学能源地质工程,2006.
[209]朱夏.关于盆地研究的几点意见[J] .石油实验地质,1980,5:19-24.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |