微生物肥料在松嫩平原盐碱地造林中的应用研究
|
摘要
松嫩平原盐渍土区隶属我国东北内陆盐渍土三大分布区域之一,长期以来是制约农业生产和植树造林成败的重点地区。该区盐渍土属于内陆苏打型盐渍土,盐分组成以NaHCO_3和Na_2CO_3为主,含有少量的硫酸盐和氯化物。通过采取工程措施和生物措施相结合的方法,改善土壤质量、提高土壤生产力成为当地经济发展和生态环境建设的重要目标,已引起广大生态学和土壤学研究工作者的广泛关注,并开展了一系列研究,但应用微生物肥料进行植树造林,分析其对土壤理化性质和林木生长等指标的影响的报道较少。
微生物肥料中含有大量的有机质、土壤有益微生物,其所含的有益微生物在其生命活动过程中,能产生大量有机酸,不断释放出土壤中的迟效态氮磷钾,能有效改善盐碱土壤的理化性质和生物性质,提高土壤肥力,这些因素都会对盐碱地植树造林和改良苏打盐碱土起到一定的积极作用,因此研究利用微生物肥料改良、利用盐碱土具有重要的意义。
本研究采用田间对比栽植的试验方法,应用微生物肥料在松嫩平原苏打盐碱地上植树造林,栽植树木为16个品种。在不同时间内,采集土壤和植物样品,分别测定树木的细胞内渗透调节物质、保护酶活性、叶绿素等7项生理生化指标;测定土壤物理参数、化学参数、有机质、腐殖质、氮素、磷素、速效钾、微生物等27项土壤指标;测定了造林后盐碱土土壤总有机碳、活性有机碳和土壤二氧化碳释放量的变化,研究微生物肥料对盐碱土种植树木、土壤理化性质、生物性质以及碳库的影响。本论文经过2004-2007年连续四年的野外观测,通过分析,得出以下主要结论:
1.应用微生物肥料造林四年后供试盐碱土地区地下水位有效降低,盐碱土理化性质明显改善,改善土壤结构,降低容重和坚实度,提高土壤孔隙度,土壤水稳性团聚体数量增加,土壤渗透性增强。
2.微生物肥料的施入能增加土壤有机质和腐殖质含量,有效降低土壤pH值,可溶性盐中SO_4~(2-)、Ca~(2+)含量增加,CO_3~(2-)、HCO_3~-、Cl~-、Na~+、含量减少,土壤化学性质向良性方向发展,含盐量降低。
3.在盐碱土壤应用微生物肥料植树造林后,土壤氮素营养各个指标及相关酶活性均得到增强,表明将建植人工林的方法与施用微生物肥料盐碱土改良方法相结合,能够在短期内较全面改善盐碱土壤的氮素营养状况,增强土壤中氮素的矿质化过程。
4.在整地基础上施用微生物肥料造林四年后,土壤磷素各指标均增强,土壤速效磷、有机磷含量、磷酸酶活性显著提高,说明施用微生物肥料后土壤可利用磷素增加,同时,土壤可能已经开始了有机磷的转化过程。
5.施加微生物肥料后,土壤微生物数量主要是细菌和放线菌,随着树木生长而逐年增加。微生物肥料的施入能有效的缓解树木生长造成的土壤中各种营养物质的减少,微生物部分可以在其生命活动的过程中活化土壤中的迟效态的氮磷钾,改善土壤的微生态环境。
6.微生物肥料在一定时期内对树木叶片中叶绿素含量的提高有促进效应,但增加的幅度各时期有所差异。微生物肥料能改善树木耐盐碱胁迫的机能,缓解盐碱胁迫对树木造成的伤害,降低脯氨酸含量,促进可溶性糖的运转,提高POD,SOD等保护酶活性,保持膜系统的稳定性。
7.应用微生物肥料造林可以明显提高土壤总有机碳和活性有机碳含量,有机碳质量得到改善。
8.应用微生物肥料造林能显著增强苏打盐碱土的呼吸作用,土壤呼吸与土壤总有机碳、土壤活性有机碳呈显著的正相关关系。
9.应用微生物肥料造林能够显著提高土壤-植物系统生物量碳,增加土壤的碳储量,相对减少土壤碳的排放,表现为碳汇的作用。
10.通过对比施用微生物肥料与不施用肥料的盐碱土上种植乔木、灌木等造林树种,结果显示:施用微生物肥料的乔木、灌木在成(存)活情况、乔木胸径、枝条长度、灌木分蘖数、叶生长、根系发育、外貌、植株颜色和生长势等各个方面均明显优于对照树木。
总之,本文系统分析了微生物肥料使用后对盐碱地土壤理化性质、营养元素和肥力状况及微生物区系的作用机理,测定了施用微生物肥料对造林树种生理生化指标及生长发育形态特征等产生的影响及作用过程,揭示了对土壤有机碳储量和土壤呼吸等碳循环关键因子的作用规律。
The saline soil area in Songnen plain is one of the three large saline soil areas in northeast inland of China.It is in the first place for its large area,wide spread,fast development and deeply hazard in northeast of our country.The leading content of this saline soil is NaHCO_3 and Na_2CO_3,which belongs to inland soda-saline soil.It is not only harmful to agricultural production but also harmful to afforestation.
Microbiological Fertilizer contains large amount of organic substances and soil available microbe.During life activities process of soil available microbe,a great deal of organic acid was produced,available form of N,P and K were released continually.These effects could improve soil physical,chemical,biological properties and soil fertility,take positive role for afforestation trees in soda-saline alkali soil and amendment of soda-saline alkali land.So research and application of Microbiological Fertilizer is important for saline land amendment and usage.
In this field test,during forestation Microbiological Fertilizer was added in soda-saline alkali soil.tree and soil samples were collected in different time.There were sixteen main forestation tree species used in this experiment.Seven physiological and biochemical indexes (osmoregulation substance in cells,protective enzyme activity and chlorophylls etc.),,twenty-seven soil parameters such as physico-chemical parametersof soil,organic substances,soil humus,nitrogen,phosphorous,available K,microbios etc.) were determined. Organic carbon changes of soils,carbon dioxide release flux and carbon equilibrium were studied along with the physical-chemical and biological properties of soils.Microbiological Fertilizer showed different effect to trees tolerance ability to salinization and physical, chemical,biological properties and carbon pool of soil.The study observed in field and analysed in lab four years from 2004 to 2007,The results are as follows:
1.After four years afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer,reduced effectively groundwater level in experiment area,physical and chemical properties of saline alkili soil were improved obviously,soil configuration were improved,bulk density and soil incorruptibility was reduced,soil porosity was enhanced,soil aggregates increased in quantity,soil permeability was enhanced.
2.Microbiological Fertilizer could increase organic substances,humus and reduce pH in soda-saline alkali soil experiments.The increase of organic substance increased obviously with addition of Microbiological Fertilizer.Liquid and thermal properties were also improved,and the biological activity was increased,pH of soil,the salinity and CO_3~(2-),HCO_3~-,Cl~-,Na~+were all decreased,SO_4~(2-),Ca~(2+) was increased and the chemical properties were improved.
3.Microbiological Fertilizer could alleviate decrease of nutrient in soil during the tree growth,soil N indexes and related enzyme activity were all enhanced.Microbiological Fertilizer could also activate underlying N,P and K in soil,improve microbial environmental.
4.Microbiological Fertilizer could alleviate decrease of nutrient in soil during the tree growth,soil P and K indexes and related enzyme activity were all enhanced.Microbiological Fertilizer could also activate underlying P and K in soil,improve microbial environmental.
5.After Microbiological Fertilizer was added in soda-saline alkali soil,soil microbios such as bacteria and actinomyces increased in quantity with tree growth year by year. Microbiological Fertilizer could activate underlying nutrient in soil during the tree growth, improve microbial environmental.
6.The content of chlorophylls in trees leaf increased with the addition of fertility,but different afforestation tree species the increased quantity of chlorophylls was different. Microbiological Fertilizer could improve afforestation tree species tolerance ability to salinization,transforming of soluble sugar and activity of protective enzyme like POD,SOD; and reduce the content of Proline,salinization damage to afforestation tree species and MDA content,and decrease damage to membrane system,which caused by membrane lipid peroxidation due to salinity stress,make stability to membrane system.
7.Afforestation with could improve the characteristics of soda-saline alkali soil by increasing the total organic carbon content and active carbon content of soil with a better quality of organic carbon.
8.Afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer could remarkably increase the respiratory intensity of soda-saline alkali soil.the respiratory,and actively organic carbon content correlated positively at a significant level with the total organic carbon content.
9.Afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer could remarkably increase the biomass in the soil-plant system,thus the carbon sequestration of soil,and reduce relatively the release of carbon of soil,playing a role of carbon sink.
10.The fertilized plants including the arbors and shrubs were showed strong growth potentialities in contrast with that of non-fertilized,plants,for example survival rate and preservation rate,biomass,diameter at breast height,shoot growth,root length and root surface area,appearance of the arbors and shrubs.
This experiment indicated that Microbiological Fertilizer could be widely used in saline land,it could accelerate afforestation tree growth process.Results of several years systematical studies in Songnen plain showed that afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer biological rehabilitation might remarkably improve the physical and chemical characteristics and biological properties of soda-saline alkali soil,thus the soil fertility was elevated.Based on the former studies,this work studied the changes of carbon pool of soda-saline alkali soil after the biological rehabilitation in order to supply valuable referential data and basic research documents to the carbon pool changes and carbon cycling for the rehabilitation of soda-saline alkali soils.
微生物肥料中含有大量的有机质、土壤有益微生物,其所含的有益微生物在其生命活动过程中,能产生大量有机酸,不断释放出土壤中的迟效态氮磷钾,能有效改善盐碱土壤的理化性质和生物性质,提高土壤肥力,这些因素都会对盐碱地植树造林和改良苏打盐碱土起到一定的积极作用,因此研究利用微生物肥料改良、利用盐碱土具有重要的意义。
本研究采用田间对比栽植的试验方法,应用微生物肥料在松嫩平原苏打盐碱地上植树造林,栽植树木为16个品种。在不同时间内,采集土壤和植物样品,分别测定树木的细胞内渗透调节物质、保护酶活性、叶绿素等7项生理生化指标;测定土壤物理参数、化学参数、有机质、腐殖质、氮素、磷素、速效钾、微生物等27项土壤指标;测定了造林后盐碱土土壤总有机碳、活性有机碳和土壤二氧化碳释放量的变化,研究微生物肥料对盐碱土种植树木、土壤理化性质、生物性质以及碳库的影响。本论文经过2004-2007年连续四年的野外观测,通过分析,得出以下主要结论:
1.应用微生物肥料造林四年后供试盐碱土地区地下水位有效降低,盐碱土理化性质明显改善,改善土壤结构,降低容重和坚实度,提高土壤孔隙度,土壤水稳性团聚体数量增加,土壤渗透性增强。
2.微生物肥料的施入能增加土壤有机质和腐殖质含量,有效降低土壤pH值,可溶性盐中SO_4~(2-)、Ca~(2+)含量增加,CO_3~(2-)、HCO_3~-、Cl~-、Na~+、含量减少,土壤化学性质向良性方向发展,含盐量降低。
3.在盐碱土壤应用微生物肥料植树造林后,土壤氮素营养各个指标及相关酶活性均得到增强,表明将建植人工林的方法与施用微生物肥料盐碱土改良方法相结合,能够在短期内较全面改善盐碱土壤的氮素营养状况,增强土壤中氮素的矿质化过程。
4.在整地基础上施用微生物肥料造林四年后,土壤磷素各指标均增强,土壤速效磷、有机磷含量、磷酸酶活性显著提高,说明施用微生物肥料后土壤可利用磷素增加,同时,土壤可能已经开始了有机磷的转化过程。
5.施加微生物肥料后,土壤微生物数量主要是细菌和放线菌,随着树木生长而逐年增加。微生物肥料的施入能有效的缓解树木生长造成的土壤中各种营养物质的减少,微生物部分可以在其生命活动的过程中活化土壤中的迟效态的氮磷钾,改善土壤的微生态环境。
6.微生物肥料在一定时期内对树木叶片中叶绿素含量的提高有促进效应,但增加的幅度各时期有所差异。微生物肥料能改善树木耐盐碱胁迫的机能,缓解盐碱胁迫对树木造成的伤害,降低脯氨酸含量,促进可溶性糖的运转,提高POD,SOD等保护酶活性,保持膜系统的稳定性。
7.应用微生物肥料造林可以明显提高土壤总有机碳和活性有机碳含量,有机碳质量得到改善。
8.应用微生物肥料造林能显著增强苏打盐碱土的呼吸作用,土壤呼吸与土壤总有机碳、土壤活性有机碳呈显著的正相关关系。
9.应用微生物肥料造林能够显著提高土壤-植物系统生物量碳,增加土壤的碳储量,相对减少土壤碳的排放,表现为碳汇的作用。
10.通过对比施用微生物肥料与不施用肥料的盐碱土上种植乔木、灌木等造林树种,结果显示:施用微生物肥料的乔木、灌木在成(存)活情况、乔木胸径、枝条长度、灌木分蘖数、叶生长、根系发育、外貌、植株颜色和生长势等各个方面均明显优于对照树木。
总之,本文系统分析了微生物肥料使用后对盐碱地土壤理化性质、营养元素和肥力状况及微生物区系的作用机理,测定了施用微生物肥料对造林树种生理生化指标及生长发育形态特征等产生的影响及作用过程,揭示了对土壤有机碳储量和土壤呼吸等碳循环关键因子的作用规律。
The saline soil area in Songnen plain is one of the three large saline soil areas in northeast inland of China.It is in the first place for its large area,wide spread,fast development and deeply hazard in northeast of our country.The leading content of this saline soil is NaHCO_3 and Na_2CO_3,which belongs to inland soda-saline soil.It is not only harmful to agricultural production but also harmful to afforestation.
Microbiological Fertilizer contains large amount of organic substances and soil available microbe.During life activities process of soil available microbe,a great deal of organic acid was produced,available form of N,P and K were released continually.These effects could improve soil physical,chemical,biological properties and soil fertility,take positive role for afforestation trees in soda-saline alkali soil and amendment of soda-saline alkali land.So research and application of Microbiological Fertilizer is important for saline land amendment and usage.
In this field test,during forestation Microbiological Fertilizer was added in soda-saline alkali soil.tree and soil samples were collected in different time.There were sixteen main forestation tree species used in this experiment.Seven physiological and biochemical indexes (osmoregulation substance in cells,protective enzyme activity and chlorophylls etc.),,twenty-seven soil parameters such as physico-chemical parametersof soil,organic substances,soil humus,nitrogen,phosphorous,available K,microbios etc.) were determined. Organic carbon changes of soils,carbon dioxide release flux and carbon equilibrium were studied along with the physical-chemical and biological properties of soils.Microbiological Fertilizer showed different effect to trees tolerance ability to salinization and physical, chemical,biological properties and carbon pool of soil.The study observed in field and analysed in lab four years from 2004 to 2007,The results are as follows:
1.After four years afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer,reduced effectively groundwater level in experiment area,physical and chemical properties of saline alkili soil were improved obviously,soil configuration were improved,bulk density and soil incorruptibility was reduced,soil porosity was enhanced,soil aggregates increased in quantity,soil permeability was enhanced.
2.Microbiological Fertilizer could increase organic substances,humus and reduce pH in soda-saline alkali soil experiments.The increase of organic substance increased obviously with addition of Microbiological Fertilizer.Liquid and thermal properties were also improved,and the biological activity was increased,pH of soil,the salinity and CO_3~(2-),HCO_3~-,Cl~-,Na~+were all decreased,SO_4~(2-),Ca~(2+) was increased and the chemical properties were improved.
3.Microbiological Fertilizer could alleviate decrease of nutrient in soil during the tree growth,soil N indexes and related enzyme activity were all enhanced.Microbiological Fertilizer could also activate underlying N,P and K in soil,improve microbial environmental.
4.Microbiological Fertilizer could alleviate decrease of nutrient in soil during the tree growth,soil P and K indexes and related enzyme activity were all enhanced.Microbiological Fertilizer could also activate underlying P and K in soil,improve microbial environmental.
5.After Microbiological Fertilizer was added in soda-saline alkali soil,soil microbios such as bacteria and actinomyces increased in quantity with tree growth year by year. Microbiological Fertilizer could activate underlying nutrient in soil during the tree growth, improve microbial environmental.
6.The content of chlorophylls in trees leaf increased with the addition of fertility,but different afforestation tree species the increased quantity of chlorophylls was different. Microbiological Fertilizer could improve afforestation tree species tolerance ability to salinization,transforming of soluble sugar and activity of protective enzyme like POD,SOD; and reduce the content of Proline,salinization damage to afforestation tree species and MDA content,and decrease damage to membrane system,which caused by membrane lipid peroxidation due to salinity stress,make stability to membrane system.
7.Afforestation with could improve the characteristics of soda-saline alkali soil by increasing the total organic carbon content and active carbon content of soil with a better quality of organic carbon.
8.Afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer could remarkably increase the respiratory intensity of soda-saline alkali soil.the respiratory,and actively organic carbon content correlated positively at a significant level with the total organic carbon content.
9.Afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer could remarkably increase the biomass in the soil-plant system,thus the carbon sequestration of soil,and reduce relatively the release of carbon of soil,playing a role of carbon sink.
10.The fertilized plants including the arbors and shrubs were showed strong growth potentialities in contrast with that of non-fertilized,plants,for example survival rate and preservation rate,biomass,diameter at breast height,shoot growth,root length and root surface area,appearance of the arbors and shrubs.
This experiment indicated that Microbiological Fertilizer could be widely used in saline land,it could accelerate afforestation tree growth process.Results of several years systematical studies in Songnen plain showed that afforestation with Microbiological Fertilizer biological rehabilitation might remarkably improve the physical and chemical characteristics and biological properties of soda-saline alkali soil,thus the soil fertility was elevated.Based on the former studies,this work studied the changes of carbon pool of soda-saline alkali soil after the biological rehabilitation in order to supply valuable referential data and basic research documents to the carbon pool changes and carbon cycling for the rehabilitation of soda-saline alkali soils.
引文
[1]王遵亲,等.中国盐渍土[M].北京:科学出版社,1993,470-483.
[2]俞仁培,扬道平,石万普,等.土壤碱化及其防治[M].北京:农业出版社,1984,39-42.
[3]俞仁培,陈德明.我国盐渍土资源及其开发利用[J].土壤通报,1999,30(4):158-159.
[4]雷志栋,尚松浩,杨诗秀,等.新疆叶尔羌河平原绿洲洼地旱排作用的初步分析[J].灌溉排水学报,1998,(3):3-6.
[5]李秀军.松嫩平原西部土地盐碱化与农业可持续发展[J].地理科学,2005,20(1):51-55.
[6]李怒云,龙怀玉.植树造林与21世纪我国盐渍土开发利用的关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,22(3):99-100.
[7]王春裕,诌议,土壤盐碱化的生态防治[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(6):67-71.
[8]刘阳春,何文寿,何进智,等.盐碱地改良利用研究进展[J].农业科学研究,2007,28(2):68-71.
[9]李彬,王志春,孙志高,等.中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(2):154-158.
[10]汪杰,张晓琴,魏怀东.河西走廊盐渍化草场土壤水盐动态观测研究[J].甘肃林业科技,1999,24(3):7-11.
[11]张文渊.水旱轮作是沿海地区改良盐碱地的重要途径[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(7):33-37.
[12]王春娜,宫伟光.盐碱地改良的研究进展[J].防护林科技,2004,62(5):38-41.
[13]牛东玲,王启基.盐碱地治理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2006,33(6):449-455.
[14]田丽萍,徐敏,郑晓峰.盐碱地改良及造林技术的探讨[J].防护林科技,2005,65(2):76-89.
[15]李月芬,杨有德,赵兰坡.硫酸铝改良剂对苏打盐碱土磷素形态的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):44-49
[16]王艳玲,韩秀英,刘元生.粉煤灰改良盐碱土植树法[J].防护林科技,1999,40(3):48-49.
[17]陈伏生,曾德慧,王桂荣.泥炭和风化煤对盐碱土的改良效应[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2004,23(6):861-864.
[18]王志平.重度盐碱地的糠醛渣改良与植物修复初步研究[D].吉林:东北师范大学,2005.
[19]于阳辉,李永霞,张俊红,等.非金属矿物在土壤改良中的应用现状与发展前景[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2005,1:37-39.
[20]曾觉廷,陈萌.三种土壤改良剂对紫色土结构孔隙状况影响的研究[J].土壤通报,1993,24(6):250-252.
[21]朱咏莉,刘军,王益权.国内外土壤结构改良剂的研究利用综述[J].水土保持学报,2005,15(6):140-142.
[22]Wallace A,Nelson S D.于目前土壤结构改良剂研究的一些动向[J].土壤学进展,1987,15(5):63-64.
[23]Daniel Hillel.Research in soil physics[J].Soil Science,1991,15(1):151-153.
[24]乔海龙,刘小京,李伟强,等.秸秆深层覆盖对土壤水盐运移及小麦生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(5):885-889.
[25]王连庄,徐树贞.麦田秸秆覆盖的作用及其节水效应的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1989(2):7-15.
[26]李伟强,雷玉平,张秀梅,等.硬壳覆盖条件下土壤冻融期水盐运动规律研究[J].冰川冻土,2001,23(3):251-256.
[27]Jones,-O.R.No-tillage effects on infiltration run off and water conservation on dry-land.American society of Agricultural Engineers,2006,37(2):473-479.
[28]李新举,张志国,刘勋岭,等.秸秆覆盖对土壤盐分运动的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,2000,31(1):38-40.
[29]郑力群,陈铭达,刘兆普,等.地面覆盖对盐渍土水热盐运动及作物生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2003,34(2):93-97.
[30]黄强,殷志刚,田长彦,等.两种覆盖方式下的土壤溶液盐分含量变化[J].干旱区地理,2001,24(1):52-56.
[31]牛东玲,王启基.盐碱地治理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2002,33(6):449-455.
[32]赵可夫,李法曾.中国盐生植物[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.120-124.
[33]]刘盛,刘振花.人工干预盐碱地植被恢复的研究[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(2):169-171
[34]王玉珍,刘永信,魏春兰,等16种盐生植物对盐碱地土壤改良情况的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,3(5):951-952,957.
[35]Borsani O.,ValpuestaV.and Botella M.A.Developing salt tolerant plants in a new century:amolecular biology aproach[J].Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Culture,2005,7(2):101-115.
[36]Maas E.V.& Nieman R.H.Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity.In:Jung,G.A.(ed.):Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions.Agron.Soc.America,Crop Sci.Soc.America and Soil Sci.Soc[J].America,MadisonWI,1978,277-299.
[37]Seemann J.R.& Critchley C.Effects of salt stress on the growth,ion content,stomatal behaviour and photosynthetic capacity of a salt-sensitive species[J].Phaseolus vulgaris L.Planta,1985,164:151-162.
[38]Yokota S.Relationship between salt tolerance and praline accumulation in Australian acacia species[J].Journal of Forest Research,2003,8(2)89-93.
[39]董晓霞,王学军,刘兆辉,等盐碱土壤生物改良利用的研究进展[J].土壤科学与资源可持续利用2008,(中):288-291.
[40]王海军,王宁.植物修复研究进展[A].环境教育与环境科学研究[C].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2001.220-225.
[41]Liang Z W,Wang Z C,Huang L H,et al.The Progress in Improvement of High pH Saline - Alkali Soil in the Songnen Plain by Stress Tolerant Plants[J].Journal of Jilin Agricultural University,2008,30(4)517-528.
[42]Ma H Y,Liang Z W,Chen Y.Research progress on improving germination rate of Leymus chinensis[J].Grassland of China,2005,27(4):G4 G8.
[43]林学政,陈靠山,何培青,等.植盐地碱蓬改良滨海盐渍土对土壤微生物区系的影响[J].生态学报2006,26(3):801-807.
[44]孙维栋,刘可星,廖宗文等.不同腐熟程度有机物料对土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2291-2296
[45]]Lung Z W,Kong X,T,Liu M,et al.Isolation and cloning of genes induced by sodium carbonate in Leymus chinensis[C].2008,IGC/IRC(in press).
[46]张克强,白成云,马宏斌,等.大同盆地金沙滩盐碱地综合治理技术开发研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(2):136-141.
[47]郜翻身,崔志祥,樊润威,等.有机物料对碱化土壤的改良作用[J].土壤通报,1997,28(1):9-11.
[48]宋轩,杜丽,张成才.有机物料改良盐碱土的效果研究[J].河南农业科学,2004,15(8):57-60.
[49]陈恩凤,王汝镛,王春裕.有机质改良盐碱土的作用[J].土壤通报,1984,18(5):193-196.
[50]石元春,辛德惠.黄淮海平原的水盐运动和早涝盐碱的综合治理[M].石家庄:河北人民出 版社,1983.67-70.
[51]石元春,李保国,李韵珠,陆锦文.区域水盐运动监测预报[M].石家庄:河北科学技术,1991.100-102.
[52]刘拥海,俞乐.滨海地区园林植物耐盐性研究[J].广西农业科学,2005,36(5):412-414.
[53]罗廷彬,任威,李彦,等.北疆盐碱地采用生物措施后的土壤盐分变化[J].土壤通报,2005,36(3):304-307.
[54]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原盐碱化草地治理及其生物生态机理[M].北京,科学出版社,1997:58-62
[55]Flowers T.J.,Troke P.F.& Yeo A.R.The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes[J].Annu.Rev.Plan Physio.,1977,28:89-121.
[56]Freitas J.B.S.,Chagas R.M.,Almeida I.,eta.Expression of physiological traits related to salt tolerance in two contrasting cowpea cultivars[J].Documentos Embrap Meio-Norte,2007,56:115-118.
[57]Gorham J.Mechanism of salt tolerance of halophytes.In:Choukr-Allah,R.,Malcolm,C.V.&Hamdy,A.(eds.):Halophytes and biosaline agriculture[J].MarceDekker,NewYork,1995,207-223.
[58]Chandra Babu R.,Srivinisan P.S.,Natarajaratnam N.& Sree.Rangasamy S.R.Relationship between leaf photosynthesis and yield in blackgram(Vigna mungo L.Hepper)geotypes[J].Photosynthetica,1985,19:159-163.
[59]苏洪君,孙钊,钱喜友,等.土壤调理剂在盐碱地造林实验研究[J].林业科技情报,2005,37(4):1-31.
[60]刘升平.探索适合大庆地区的绿化措施.国土绿化.2002(3):16-18.
[61]刘会超,孙振元,彭镇华.盐碱土绿化植物的应用与评价[J].中南林学院学报,2006,23(5):30-33.
[62]邢尚军,张建锋,郗金标,宋玉民.白刺造林对重盐碱地的改良效果[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(6):96-98
[63]苏洪君,孙钊,钱喜友,等.土壤调理剂在盐碱地造林实验研究[J].林业科技情报,2005,37(4):1-31.
[64]尚军,薄其祥,吕雷昌,等.海重盐碱地白刺耐盐性及其栽培技术研究[J].山东林业科技,2000,127(2):7-11.
[65]田长彦,周宏飞.21世纪新疆土壤盐渍化调控与农业持续发展研究建议[J].干旱区地理,2000,23(2):177-180.
[66]姜岩.保护环境保护黑土带实施绿色农业工程[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(专辑):48-50.
[67]李怒云,龙怀玉.植树造林与21世纪我国盐渍土开发利用的关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,22(3):99-100.
[68]田朋萍,徐敏,郑晓峰,等.盐碱地改良及造林技术探讨[J].防护林科技,2005(2):86-89.
[69]王奎武.盐碱荒滩荒地柽柳造林技术[J].林业科技,2000,25(5):13-14.
[70]干艳玲,韩秀英,刘元生,等.粉煤灰改良盐碱土植树法[J].防护林科技,1999(3):48-49.
[71]沙敬禹,张跃勇.盐碱地灰杨育苗与造林技术[J].林业科技通讯,1999,2:22-23.
[72]龚洪柱.盐碱地造林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2000,89-92.
[73]房用,王太明,刘得玺等.大果沙棘耐盐碱品种筛选试验[J].经济林研究,2003,21(3):48- 50.
[74]贾文.林木耐盐力测定中几个问题的商榷[J].山东林业科技,2003,1:45-47.
[75]林栖凤,李冠一.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].生物工程进展.2000,2:20-25.
[76]张建锋,李吉跃,宋玉民等.植物耐盐机理与耐盐植物选育研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2006,16(2):16-22.
[77]苑增武,张孝民,毛齐来,等大庆地区主要造林树种耐盐碱能力评价[J].2000,42(1)15-59
[78]陶静,秦彩云,姚录贤等.杨树耐盐性突变体育种的研究进展[J].吉林林业科技,2005,50(2):5-8.
[79]陶晶,宋全民,秦彩云等.杨树基因工程抗性育种的研究现状与发展前景[J].吉林林业科技,2001,30(5):6-9.
[80]黎祜琛,邱治军.树木抗旱性及抗旱造林技术研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(4):17-22.
[81]张建锋.盐碱地造林绿化的原理与技术[J].盐碱地利用,1992(3):12-15.
[82]张建锋.盐碱地改良利用研究进展[J].山东林业科技,1997(3):23-25.
[83]王志刚,包耀贤.12个树种耐盐碱性田间比较试验[J].防护林科技,2000(4):9-11.
[84]赵明范,葛成,翟志中.干旱地区次生盐碱地主要造林树种抗盐指标的确定及耐盐能力排序[J].林业科学研究,1997,10(2):194-198.
[85]李兰晓,王海鹰,杨涛,等.土壤微生物菌肥在盐碱地造林中的应用[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(4):60-63.
[86]陈华豪,丁思统,蔡贤如,等.林业应用数理统计[M].大连:大连海运学院出版社.1992,88-90.
[87]李培夫..盐碱地的生物改良与抗盐植物的开发利用[J].垦殖与稻作,1999(3):38-40.
[88]李笑吟,毕华兴,刁锐民,等.-土壤水分测定系统的原理及其在黄土高原土壤水分监测中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2005.3(1):112-115.
[89]伍永秋,刘宝元,等.黄土高原土壤水分的自动监测系统及其应用[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(2):108-111.
[90]康绍忠,积水入渗条件下土壤水分动态变化的野外观测与分析--以内蒙古敖包小流域为例[J].水土保持学报,1997.17(1):7-12.
[91]Alexander,Zuberen.Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderop Hore production by rhizopHere bacteria BiolAnd fertility of Soil.1991.12(1):39-45.
[92]Arrillaga I,Gil-Mascarell R,Gisbert C,et al.Expression of the yeast HAL2 gene in tomato increases the in vitro salt Tolerance of transgenic progenies.Plant Sci.1998.13(6):219-226.
[93]Bowler C,Slooten L,Vandenbranden S,et al.Manganese superoxide dismutase can reduce cellular damage mediated by oxygen radicals in transgenic.EMBO J,1991,10(2):1723-1732.
[94]Brito D E etal.Effect of compost on rhizospHere microflora of the tomato and on theincidence of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria.Applied and Environ.Microbiol.1995,61(1):194-199.
[95]Chen F S,Chen G Sand Zeng D H et al.The effect of peat and weathered coal on the growth of Pinus sylvfatris var.mongolica seedlings on Aeolian sandy soil.Journal of forest Research.2007,13(4):251-254.
[96]Fermando E.Prado,Cecilia Boero,Miriam Gallardo.Effect of NaCI on germination,growth,and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa Willd seeds.Bot.BuIl.Acad.Sin.2005,(41):27-34.
[97]Hasegawa,PMBressan,R.A,Zhu,J.K,et al.Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity.Annu.Rev,Plant Physiol.Plant Mol.Biol.2006,(1):463-499.
[98]牛治宇.国内外微生物肥料的概况与发展趋势[J].热带作物科技,1997,(2):16-18.
[99]何随成,江志阳,尹微等.生物有机肥对提高土壤肥力及作物品质等综合效果研究[J].腐植酸.2006,(1):39-44.
[100]黄锦法.生物有机复合肥的生产应用及其发展前景探讨[J].嘉兴农业.专辑1998:6-7.
[101]谢明杰,程爱华,曹文伟.我国微生物肥料的研究进展及发展趋势[J].微生物学杂志.2000,20(4):42-45.
[102]许前欣,孟兆芳,于彩虹.微生物肥料农业应用的效益评价[J].天津农业科学,2000,6(2):44-46.
[103]占新华,蒋延惠,徐阳春等.微生物制剂促进植物生长机理的研究进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报.1999,5(2):97-105.
[104]张锐等.有机肥在改良盐渍土中的作用[J].土壤肥料.1997,(4):11-14.
[105]高宝岩.生物肥料的作用及其应用前景分析[J].天津农业科技.2000,(1):27-28.
[106]郭春景,关兆红,李玉文等.生物有机肥料对人参重茬栽培地土壤微生态环境的影响研究[J].生物技术.2004,(14):55-56.
[107]Hemandez J A,CampolloA and Jinenez A.Response of antioxidant systems and leaf water relations to NaCI stress in pea plants[J].New Phytol.1991,141(2):241-251.
[108]Livia Simon-Sarkadi,Gabor Kocsy,Zoltan Sebestyen.Effect of salt stress on free aminoacid and polyamine content in cereals[J].Plant Physiology.2007,73-75.
[109]Promorse S B.The role of the microbe.J.of Applied Bacteriology[J].A review:Etheylene and agriculture.1979,4(6):1-25.
[110]Rodriguez HG,Boberts JKM,Jordan WR,Drew MC Growth,Water relations and accumulation of organic and inorganic studies in roots of Maize seedlings during salt stress[J].Plant Physiol.1997,11(3):881-893.
[111]Xu D,Duan X,Wang B,et al.Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene,HVA1,from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice[J].Plant Physiol.1996.,1(10):249-257.
[112]谢承陶,主编.盐碱土改良原理与作物抗性[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1993,120-181.
[113]谢承陶,等.有机肥改良盐碱土试验研究[J].土壤通报,1987,18(3):97-99.
[114]石元亮,王晶,等.有机物料改良苏打盐土机制的研究--对土壤化学组成及盐碱特性的影响[J].土壤通报,1989,20(4):154-157.
[115]严慧峻,逢焕成,李玉义,等.微生物复混肥对盐碱土及白菜品质改良的影响[J].土壤肥料科学,2008,24(12):270-273.
[116]黄强,殷志刚,田长彦,等.施有机肥条件下的土壤溶液盐分变化动态[J].干旱区研究,2001,18(1):53-56.
[117]吕爱英,王永歧,沈阿林,等6种微生物肥料在不同作物上的应用效果[J].河南农业科学,2004,4:49-51.
[118]王素英,陶光灿,谢光辉,等.我国微生物肥料的应用研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2003,8(1):14-18.
[119]李新平,李素俭.Cat No 5500欲分传感器测定土壤盐分的研究[J].西北农业大学学报,1997,25(3):25-27.
[120]张绍德,俞仁培.有机物料改良碱化土壤的作用[A].见:俞仁培,龙文瑞,主编.土壤盐化碱化的监测与防治[C].北京:科学出版社1993,97-106.
[121]吴薇.我国微生物肥料生产和应用现状的调查研究[J]微生物学通报,1995,22(2):104-107.
[122]黑龙江省土地管理局,黑龙江省土壤普查办公室.黑龙江土壤[M].北京:农业出版社,1992,277-278.
[123]王春裕,王汝镛.中国东北地区盐渍土的生态分区[J].土壤通报,1999,30(5):193-196.
[124]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原盐碱化草地改良治理的研究[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1995(1):110-114.
[125]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原碱化草地的生态恢复及其优化模式[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1995(3):67-71.
[126]B.A.柯夫达著,席承藩等译.盐碱土的发生与演变[M].科学出版社,1957.130-133.
[127]李取生.松嫩平原苏打盐碱地治理与利用.资源科学.2003,25(1):15-20.
[128]盛连喜等.松嫩平原盐碱化土地的修复与调控研究.东北师大学报(自然科学版),2002,1(3):30-34.
[129]李崇皓 松嫩平原的植被[J]地理科学,1982,2(2):170-178.
[130]王文柱,张庆成.大庆农业资源与区划[M].哈尔滨.黑龙江科学出版社,1987:252-258.
[131]周有才,赵洪书.松嫩平原土壤水分动态的研究[J].土壤学报,1979,16(3):302-305.
[132]赵洪书.季节性冻土区的地下水状况及其研究方法[J].土壤学报,1981,18(4):389-394.
[133]Bao D L.Ameliorative influence of organic matter on biological activity of salt - affected soils[J].Arid Soil ResReh,1996,10(4):311-319.
[134]Kenneth K.Tanji.Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management.New York:American Society of Civil Engineers,2000,197-226.
[135]Abel,G.H.,Mackenzie,A.J.,Salt tolerance of soybean varieties during germination and later growth.Crop Sci.1964,(4):157-161.
[136]Epstein,E.,Grant,W.J.,Water stress relations of the potato plant under field conditions.Agron.J.1973,(65):400-404.
[137]Ferreira,I.,Katerji,N.,Is stomatal conductance in tomato crop controlled by soil or atmosphere? Oecologia 1992,(92):104-107.
[138]Hiler,E.A.,Clark,N,Stress day index to characterize effects of water stress on crop yields.Trans.ASAE 1971,(14):757-761.
[139]李酉开主编.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983:100-133
[140]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2000.
[141]土壤理化分析.中国科学院南京土壤研究所,1978,136-140.
[142]傅绍清,宋金玉.土壤有效磷的测定方法及其与磷素形态关系的研究[J].土壤学报,1982,19(3):305-310.
[143]顾益初,蒋柏藩.石灰性土壤无机磷分级的测定方法[J].土壤,1990,22(2):101-102.
[144]许光辉等.土壤微生物分析方法手册1986
[145]林启美.熏蒸法测定土壤微生物量(碳)的改进[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(2):63-66.
[146]王晶,解宏图等.土壤活性有机质(碳)的内涵和现代分析方法概述[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(6):109-112
[147]Chen S,Wang S,Altman A et al.Genotypic variation in drought tolerance of polar in relation to abscisic acid[J].Tree Physiology,1997,17(12):797-803.
[148]Chen S,Wang S,Huttermann A et al.Xylem abscisic acid accelerates leaf abscission by modulating polyamine and ethylene synthesis in water-stressed intact polar[J].Tree Structure and Function,2004,16(1):16-22.
[149]徐惠风,金研铭,张春祥等.向日葵叶片可溶性糖含量的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(1):23-25.
[150]杨国会,马尧,李如升,田永清.NaCl对甘草叶片脯氮酸含量以及质膜相对透性的影响[J].农业与技术,2000,20(5):43-45.
[151]陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导.广州:华南理工大学出版社2002,90-94
[152]沈慧娟,曾斌.干旱、低温胁迫对SOD,POD活性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16(4):54-57.
[153]郝再彬.植物生理实验.哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社2004,87-89.
[154]Zhang W H,Calos H,Prado B A.,et al.Analysis on the daily courses of water potential of nine woody species from Cerrado vegetation during wet season[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2005,11(1):7-12.
[155]Wei T X,Zhu J Z,Zhang X P.Soil water balance of protection forest in the loess plateau [J].Forestry Studies in China,1999,1(2):47-53.
[156]魏天兴,朱金兆,张学培.林分蒸散耗水量测定方法评述[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):85-91.
[157]王孟本,李洪建,柴宝峰,等.树种蒸腾作用、光合作用和蒸腾效率的比较研究[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(5):401-410.
[158]吕殿青,王文焰,王全九.入渗与蒸发条件下土壤水盐运移的研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):61-66.
[159]王春裕.诌议,土壤盐碱化的生态防治[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(6):67-71.
[160]张锐等.有机肥在改良盐渍土中的作用[J].土壤肥料.1997,(4):11-14.
[161]刘孝义.土壤物理及土壤改良研究法[J].土壤通报,1981,(5):21-23.
[162]李志丹,千友民等.牧草改良盐渍化土壤理化性质研究进展[J].草业科学,2004,21(6):17-20.
[163]倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗.土壤生物活性有机碳库及其表征指标研究[J].植物营养与施肥学报,2001,7(1):56-63.
[164]牛灵安,郝晋氓.盐渍土熟化过程中腐殖质特性的研究[J].土壤学报,2001,38(1):114- 122.
[165]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土腐殖质和几种酶活性的影响[J].植物研究.2003,23(2)211-214.
[166]范亚文.种植耐盐植物改良盐碱土的研究[D].东北林业大学博士论文2001,70-77.
[167]袁玲,杨邦俊,郑兰君,等.长期施肥对土壤酶活性和氮磷养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(4):300-306.
[168]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土壤氮素营养状况的影响[J].植物研究.2004,24(3)369-373.
[169]Bhatti A U,Khan Q,et al.Effect of Organic Manure and Properties and Crop Yield on Chemical Amendments on Soil a Salt[J].Afected Entiso Pedosphe,2005,15(1):46-51.
[170]杨莉琳,李金海.我国盐渍化土壤的营养与施肥效应研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(2):79-81
[171]占新华,蒋延惠,徐阳春等.微生物制剂促进植物生长机理的研究进展.植物营养与肥料学报.1999,5(2):97-105
[172]齐志勇.不同培肥模式对土壤呼吸和土壤养分变化影响的研究.硕士学位论文.东北农业大学2006,90-94.
[173]贾丙瑞,周广胜等.土壤微生物与根系呼吸作用影响因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1547-1552.
[174]闫德仁,人工林土壤腐殖质特性和土壤酶活性的研究[J].林业科技,1997,22(5):10-12.
[175]周礼恺.土壤酶学.北京:科学出版社,1987,69-90.
[176]丁宁平,周广业.酶活性在评价旱地土壤培肥效果中的作用[J].土壤通报,1990,21(6):269-271.
[177]Zhang Y L,Wang Y S.Soil enzyme activities with greenhouse subsurface irrigation[J].Pedosphere,2006,25(4):512-518.
[178]Yu S,Li Y,Wang J H,et al..Study on the soil microbial biomass as a bio-indicator of soil quality in the red earth ecosystem[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,1999,36(3):413-421.
[179]Joseph O D,Schjenning P,Sibbesen E,et al...Aggregation and organic matter fractions of three Nigerian soils as affected by soil disturbance and incorporation of plant material[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1999,50(2):105-114
[180]Theng B K G,Aislabie J,Fraser R.Bioavailability of phenanthrene intercalated into an alkylammonium montmorillonite clay[J].SoilBiBinnhem,2001,33:845-848.
[181]李东坡,武志杰,陈利军.土壤生物学活性对施入有机肥料的响应--土壤酶活性的响应[J].土壤通报,2003,34(5):463-468.
[182]张咏梅,周国逸,吴宁.土壤酶学的研究进展[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(1):83-90.
[183]徐长兴.施肥对砂姜黑土供磷能力的影响及磷肥后效[J].安徽农业科学,1999,27(1):38-41.
[184]郭晓冬,安战士.石灰性土壤中无机磷有效性的研究[J].土壤通报,1991,22(5):201-203.
[185]Al-Karki Ghazi N C.Barley response to salt stress to varied level of phosorus[J].Plant Nutr,1997,20(1):1635-1643.
[186]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土壤磷素营养的影响[J].植物研究.2004,24(1)50-52.
[187]蒋柏藩,沈仁芳.土壤无机磷分级的研究[J].土壤学进展,2000,18(1):1-8.
[188]赵兰波,姜岩.土壤磷酸酶的方法探讨[J].土壤通报,1986,17(3):138-141.
[189]李志洪,陈丹,曹国军.黑土、黑钙土玉米苗期根际无机磷的形态变化[J].土壤学报,1999,36(1):127-131.
[190]孙国荣等.星星草的生长对盐碱土磷素营养的影响[J].草地学报,2004,12(4):337-339.
[191]孙国荣,阎秀峰,李晶.星星草对.土壤理化性质的影响[J].草地学报,2002,10(2):179-183.
[192]张晓琴,胡明贵.紫花苜蓿对盐渍化土地理化性质的影响[J].草业科学,2004,21(11):31-34.
[193]岳中辉,于东等.种植星星草对盐碱土壤氮素和磷素含量的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2003,34(3):266-269.
[194]王淑平,周广胜,吕育才.中国东北样带土壤碳、氮、磷的梯度分布及其与气候因子的关系[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):513-517.
[195]袁玲,杨邦俊,郑兰君,等.长期施肥对土壤酶活性和氮磷养分的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(4):300-306.
[196]周礼恺,张志明.土壤酶的测定方法[J].土壤通报,1980,11(5):37-38.
[197]章永松,林咸永.有机肥(物)土壤中磷的活化作用机理研究有机肥(物)对不同形态无机磷的活化作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):151-155.
[198]Gerke J.Kinetics of soil phosphate desorption as affected by citric acid[J].Z.P flanzenemahr.Bodenk,1994,15(7):17-22.
[199]Gerke Jorg.Phosphate,aluminium and iron in the soil solution of three different soils inrelation to varying concentrations of citric acid.[J].Z.Pflanzenernahr.Bodenk,1992,15(5):339-343.
[200]曹一平,崔健宇.石灰性土壤中油菜根际磷的化学动态及生物有效性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1994,1(试刊):49-54.
[201]章永松,林咸永.有机肥(物)土壤中磷的活化作用机理研究有机肥(物)分解产生的有机酸及其对不同形态磷的活化作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):151-155.
[202]史瑞和.江苏省几种土壤磷素状况和磷肥肥效[J].土壤学报,1962,10:374-379.
[203]顾益初,蒋柏藩,鲁如坤.风化对土壤粒级中磷素形态转化及其有效性的影响[J].土壤学报,1984,21(2):134-143.
[204]Sharpley A N,Smith S J.Fractionation of inorganic and organic phosphorus in virgin and cultivated soils[J].Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J,1985,49:127-130.
[205]Bowman R A,Cole C V.An exploratory method for fractionation of organic phosphorus from grassland soil[J].Soil Sci,1978,12(5):95-118.
[206]张锐,严慧峻,魏山庆,等.有机肥在改良盐渍上中的作用.土壤肥料,1997,23(4):11-14.
[207]吴薇等.我国微生物肥料生产和应用现状的调查研究[J]微生物学通报,1995,22(2):104-107.
[208]Bhatti A U,Khan Q,et al.Effect of Organic Manure and Properties and Crop Yield on Chemical Amendments on Soil a Salt[J].Afected Entiso Pedosphe,2005,15(1):46-51.
[209]贾丙瑞,周广胜等.土壤微生物与根系呼吸作用影响因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1547-1552.
[210]李灵.不同退化林地土壤微生物生物量动态.硕士学位论文.福建农林大学2004,100-105.
[211]胡江春等.植物根际菌PGPR的研究与应用.第二届全国微生物肥料生产应用技术研讨会论文集.江苏.2003,87-90.
[212]孟磊,丁维新等.长期定量施肥对土壤有机碳储量和土壤呼吸影响[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(6):687-691.
[213]邵月红,潘剑君,孙波.长期施肥对红壤不同形态碳的影响[J].中国生态农业学,2006,14(1):125-127.
[214]孙庚,吴宁,罗鹏.不同管理措施对川西北草地土壤氮和碳特征的影响[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(2):304-310.
[215]刘淑霞,刘景双,赵明东等.土壤活性有机碳与养分有效性及作物产量的关系[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(5):539-543.
[216]倪进治,徐建民.不同有机肥料对土壤生物活性有机质组分的动态影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(4):374-378.
[217]倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗.土壤轻组有机质[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2004,1(2):58-64.
[218]Grego rich E G,Janzen H H.Storage of soil carbon in the light fraction and macroorganic matter[J].Advances in soil science,1996,167-190.
[219]Janzen H H,Campbell C A,Brandt S A,et al..Light-fraction organicmatter in soils from long-term croprotations[J].Soil Sci,1992,56:1799-1806.
[220]胡诚,曹志平,叶钟年,等.不同的土壤培肥措施对低肥力农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响[J]生态学报,2006,26(3):808-814.
[221]刘文娜,吴文良等.不同土壤类型和农业用地方式对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(3):406-411.
[222]陈国潮,何振立,黄昌勇.红壤微生物量(碳)周转及其研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(2):152-160.
[223]陈四清,崔藐勇,周广胜等.内蒙古锡林河流域大针茅草原土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的CO_2排放速率研究[J].植物学报,1999,41(6):645-650.
[224]崔晓勇,陈四清,陈佐忠等.大针茅典型草原土壤CO_2排放规律的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):390-394.
[225]陈全胜,李凌志,韩兴国等.典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性和土壤水分的关系[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):831-835.
[226]董云社,齐玉春.草地生态系统碳循环过程研究进展[J].地理研究,2006,25(1):8-10.
[227]Roar D J.Protease activity and it's relationship to nitronen mineralization in some soil under pasture and ttusock nrassland.New Zealand Journal of Sciences,1997,22(2):179-185.
[228]安卫红,张淑民.石灰性土壤无机磷的分级及其有效性研究[J].土壤通报,1991,22(1):34-371.
[229]王文柱,张庆成.大庆农业资源与区划[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1987,252-258.
[230]王洪春.植物抗逆性与生物膜结构功能研究的进展,植物生理学通讯.1985,20(1):60-66.
[231]杜军华,冯桂莲.高溶盐胁迫对蚕豆叶绿素a和b含量的影响.青海师范大学学报.2000,38(4):36-38
[232]曹仪植,宋占午主编.植物生理学.兰州,兰州大学出版社1998:78-80.
[233]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京,高等教育出版社2000:120-124.
[234]林学政,沈继红,刘克斋,黄晓航.种植盐地碱蓬修复滨海盐渍土效果的研究[[J].海洋科学进展,2005,23(1):65-69.
[235]Voikmar K TrI,Hu Y,Steppuhn H.Physiological Responses of Plant Salinity[J].Plant Sci.,1998,78(1):19-27.
[236]Hanay A,et al.Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost[J].Compost Science&Utilization,2004,12(2):175-178.
[237]Zhang Y H.Desalination Effects of Salt tolerant Plants Growing in Alkali-saline Soil in Ningxia[J].Gansu Agr.Sci.and Tech.,2005,19(3):48-49.
[238]Karyotis T H,Iliadis C,Noulas C H,Mitsibonas T H.Preliminary Research on Seed Production and Nutrient Content for Certain Quinoa Varieties in a saline-sodic soil[J].Agronomy &Crop Science,2003,180(4):402-408.
[2]俞仁培,扬道平,石万普,等.土壤碱化及其防治[M].北京:农业出版社,1984,39-42.
[3]俞仁培,陈德明.我国盐渍土资源及其开发利用[J].土壤通报,1999,30(4):158-159.
[4]雷志栋,尚松浩,杨诗秀,等.新疆叶尔羌河平原绿洲洼地旱排作用的初步分析[J].灌溉排水学报,1998,(3):3-6.
[5]李秀军.松嫩平原西部土地盐碱化与农业可持续发展[J].地理科学,2005,20(1):51-55.
[6]李怒云,龙怀玉.植树造林与21世纪我国盐渍土开发利用的关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,22(3):99-100.
[7]王春裕,诌议,土壤盐碱化的生态防治[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(6):67-71.
[8]刘阳春,何文寿,何进智,等.盐碱地改良利用研究进展[J].农业科学研究,2007,28(2):68-71.
[9]李彬,王志春,孙志高,等.中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(2):154-158.
[10]汪杰,张晓琴,魏怀东.河西走廊盐渍化草场土壤水盐动态观测研究[J].甘肃林业科技,1999,24(3):7-11.
[11]张文渊.水旱轮作是沿海地区改良盐碱地的重要途径[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(7):33-37.
[12]王春娜,宫伟光.盐碱地改良的研究进展[J].防护林科技,2004,62(5):38-41.
[13]牛东玲,王启基.盐碱地治理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2006,33(6):449-455.
[14]田丽萍,徐敏,郑晓峰.盐碱地改良及造林技术的探讨[J].防护林科技,2005,65(2):76-89.
[15]李月芬,杨有德,赵兰坡.硫酸铝改良剂对苏打盐碱土磷素形态的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):44-49
[16]王艳玲,韩秀英,刘元生.粉煤灰改良盐碱土植树法[J].防护林科技,1999,40(3):48-49.
[17]陈伏生,曾德慧,王桂荣.泥炭和风化煤对盐碱土的改良效应[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2004,23(6):861-864.
[18]王志平.重度盐碱地的糠醛渣改良与植物修复初步研究[D].吉林:东北师范大学,2005.
[19]于阳辉,李永霞,张俊红,等.非金属矿物在土壤改良中的应用现状与发展前景[J].中国非金属矿工业导刊,2005,1:37-39.
[20]曾觉廷,陈萌.三种土壤改良剂对紫色土结构孔隙状况影响的研究[J].土壤通报,1993,24(6):250-252.
[21]朱咏莉,刘军,王益权.国内外土壤结构改良剂的研究利用综述[J].水土保持学报,2005,15(6):140-142.
[22]Wallace A,Nelson S D.于目前土壤结构改良剂研究的一些动向[J].土壤学进展,1987,15(5):63-64.
[23]Daniel Hillel.Research in soil physics[J].Soil Science,1991,15(1):151-153.
[24]乔海龙,刘小京,李伟强,等.秸秆深层覆盖对土壤水盐运移及小麦生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(5):885-889.
[25]王连庄,徐树贞.麦田秸秆覆盖的作用及其节水效应的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1989(2):7-15.
[26]李伟强,雷玉平,张秀梅,等.硬壳覆盖条件下土壤冻融期水盐运动规律研究[J].冰川冻土,2001,23(3):251-256.
[27]Jones,-O.R.No-tillage effects on infiltration run off and water conservation on dry-land.American society of Agricultural Engineers,2006,37(2):473-479.
[28]李新举,张志国,刘勋岭,等.秸秆覆盖对土壤盐分运动的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,2000,31(1):38-40.
[29]郑力群,陈铭达,刘兆普,等.地面覆盖对盐渍土水热盐运动及作物生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2003,34(2):93-97.
[30]黄强,殷志刚,田长彦,等.两种覆盖方式下的土壤溶液盐分含量变化[J].干旱区地理,2001,24(1):52-56.
[31]牛东玲,王启基.盐碱地治理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2002,33(6):449-455.
[32]赵可夫,李法曾.中国盐生植物[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.120-124.
[33]]刘盛,刘振花.人工干预盐碱地植被恢复的研究[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(2):169-171
[34]王玉珍,刘永信,魏春兰,等16种盐生植物对盐碱地土壤改良情况的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,3(5):951-952,957.
[35]Borsani O.,ValpuestaV.and Botella M.A.Developing salt tolerant plants in a new century:amolecular biology aproach[J].Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Culture,2005,7(2):101-115.
[36]Maas E.V.& Nieman R.H.Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity.In:Jung,G.A.(ed.):Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions.Agron.Soc.America,Crop Sci.Soc.America and Soil Sci.Soc[J].America,MadisonWI,1978,277-299.
[37]Seemann J.R.& Critchley C.Effects of salt stress on the growth,ion content,stomatal behaviour and photosynthetic capacity of a salt-sensitive species[J].Phaseolus vulgaris L.Planta,1985,164:151-162.
[38]Yokota S.Relationship between salt tolerance and praline accumulation in Australian acacia species[J].Journal of Forest Research,2003,8(2)89-93.
[39]董晓霞,王学军,刘兆辉,等盐碱土壤生物改良利用的研究进展[J].土壤科学与资源可持续利用2008,(中):288-291.
[40]王海军,王宁.植物修复研究进展[A].环境教育与环境科学研究[C].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2001.220-225.
[41]Liang Z W,Wang Z C,Huang L H,et al.The Progress in Improvement of High pH Saline - Alkali Soil in the Songnen Plain by Stress Tolerant Plants[J].Journal of Jilin Agricultural University,2008,30(4)517-528.
[42]Ma H Y,Liang Z W,Chen Y.Research progress on improving germination rate of Leymus chinensis[J].Grassland of China,2005,27(4):G4 G8.
[43]林学政,陈靠山,何培青,等.植盐地碱蓬改良滨海盐渍土对土壤微生物区系的影响[J].生态学报2006,26(3):801-807.
[44]孙维栋,刘可星,廖宗文等.不同腐熟程度有机物料对土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2291-2296
[45]]Lung Z W,Kong X,T,Liu M,et al.Isolation and cloning of genes induced by sodium carbonate in Leymus chinensis[C].2008,IGC/IRC(in press).
[46]张克强,白成云,马宏斌,等.大同盆地金沙滩盐碱地综合治理技术开发研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(2):136-141.
[47]郜翻身,崔志祥,樊润威,等.有机物料对碱化土壤的改良作用[J].土壤通报,1997,28(1):9-11.
[48]宋轩,杜丽,张成才.有机物料改良盐碱土的效果研究[J].河南农业科学,2004,15(8):57-60.
[49]陈恩凤,王汝镛,王春裕.有机质改良盐碱土的作用[J].土壤通报,1984,18(5):193-196.
[50]石元春,辛德惠.黄淮海平原的水盐运动和早涝盐碱的综合治理[M].石家庄:河北人民出 版社,1983.67-70.
[51]石元春,李保国,李韵珠,陆锦文.区域水盐运动监测预报[M].石家庄:河北科学技术,1991.100-102.
[52]刘拥海,俞乐.滨海地区园林植物耐盐性研究[J].广西农业科学,2005,36(5):412-414.
[53]罗廷彬,任威,李彦,等.北疆盐碱地采用生物措施后的土壤盐分变化[J].土壤通报,2005,36(3):304-307.
[54]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原盐碱化草地治理及其生物生态机理[M].北京,科学出版社,1997:58-62
[55]Flowers T.J.,Troke P.F.& Yeo A.R.The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes[J].Annu.Rev.Plan Physio.,1977,28:89-121.
[56]Freitas J.B.S.,Chagas R.M.,Almeida I.,eta.Expression of physiological traits related to salt tolerance in two contrasting cowpea cultivars[J].Documentos Embrap Meio-Norte,2007,56:115-118.
[57]Gorham J.Mechanism of salt tolerance of halophytes.In:Choukr-Allah,R.,Malcolm,C.V.&Hamdy,A.(eds.):Halophytes and biosaline agriculture[J].MarceDekker,NewYork,1995,207-223.
[58]Chandra Babu R.,Srivinisan P.S.,Natarajaratnam N.& Sree.Rangasamy S.R.Relationship between leaf photosynthesis and yield in blackgram(Vigna mungo L.Hepper)geotypes[J].Photosynthetica,1985,19:159-163.
[59]苏洪君,孙钊,钱喜友,等.土壤调理剂在盐碱地造林实验研究[J].林业科技情报,2005,37(4):1-31.
[60]刘升平.探索适合大庆地区的绿化措施.国土绿化.2002(3):16-18.
[61]刘会超,孙振元,彭镇华.盐碱土绿化植物的应用与评价[J].中南林学院学报,2006,23(5):30-33.
[62]邢尚军,张建锋,郗金标,宋玉民.白刺造林对重盐碱地的改良效果[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(6):96-98
[63]苏洪君,孙钊,钱喜友,等.土壤调理剂在盐碱地造林实验研究[J].林业科技情报,2005,37(4):1-31.
[64]尚军,薄其祥,吕雷昌,等.海重盐碱地白刺耐盐性及其栽培技术研究[J].山东林业科技,2000,127(2):7-11.
[65]田长彦,周宏飞.21世纪新疆土壤盐渍化调控与农业持续发展研究建议[J].干旱区地理,2000,23(2):177-180.
[66]姜岩.保护环境保护黑土带实施绿色农业工程[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(专辑):48-50.
[67]李怒云,龙怀玉.植树造林与21世纪我国盐渍土开发利用的关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,22(3):99-100.
[68]田朋萍,徐敏,郑晓峰,等.盐碱地改良及造林技术探讨[J].防护林科技,2005(2):86-89.
[69]王奎武.盐碱荒滩荒地柽柳造林技术[J].林业科技,2000,25(5):13-14.
[70]干艳玲,韩秀英,刘元生,等.粉煤灰改良盐碱土植树法[J].防护林科技,1999(3):48-49.
[71]沙敬禹,张跃勇.盐碱地灰杨育苗与造林技术[J].林业科技通讯,1999,2:22-23.
[72]龚洪柱.盐碱地造林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2000,89-92.
[73]房用,王太明,刘得玺等.大果沙棘耐盐碱品种筛选试验[J].经济林研究,2003,21(3):48- 50.
[74]贾文.林木耐盐力测定中几个问题的商榷[J].山东林业科技,2003,1:45-47.
[75]林栖凤,李冠一.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].生物工程进展.2000,2:20-25.
[76]张建锋,李吉跃,宋玉民等.植物耐盐机理与耐盐植物选育研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2006,16(2):16-22.
[77]苑增武,张孝民,毛齐来,等大庆地区主要造林树种耐盐碱能力评价[J].2000,42(1)15-59
[78]陶静,秦彩云,姚录贤等.杨树耐盐性突变体育种的研究进展[J].吉林林业科技,2005,50(2):5-8.
[79]陶晶,宋全民,秦彩云等.杨树基因工程抗性育种的研究现状与发展前景[J].吉林林业科技,2001,30(5):6-9.
[80]黎祜琛,邱治军.树木抗旱性及抗旱造林技术研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(4):17-22.
[81]张建锋.盐碱地造林绿化的原理与技术[J].盐碱地利用,1992(3):12-15.
[82]张建锋.盐碱地改良利用研究进展[J].山东林业科技,1997(3):23-25.
[83]王志刚,包耀贤.12个树种耐盐碱性田间比较试验[J].防护林科技,2000(4):9-11.
[84]赵明范,葛成,翟志中.干旱地区次生盐碱地主要造林树种抗盐指标的确定及耐盐能力排序[J].林业科学研究,1997,10(2):194-198.
[85]李兰晓,王海鹰,杨涛,等.土壤微生物菌肥在盐碱地造林中的应用[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(4):60-63.
[86]陈华豪,丁思统,蔡贤如,等.林业应用数理统计[M].大连:大连海运学院出版社.1992,88-90.
[87]李培夫..盐碱地的生物改良与抗盐植物的开发利用[J].垦殖与稻作,1999(3):38-40.
[88]李笑吟,毕华兴,刁锐民,等.-土壤水分测定系统的原理及其在黄土高原土壤水分监测中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2005.3(1):112-115.
[89]伍永秋,刘宝元,等.黄土高原土壤水分的自动监测系统及其应用[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(2):108-111.
[90]康绍忠,积水入渗条件下土壤水分动态变化的野外观测与分析--以内蒙古敖包小流域为例[J].水土保持学报,1997.17(1):7-12.
[91]Alexander,Zuberen.Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderop Hore production by rhizopHere bacteria BiolAnd fertility of Soil.1991.12(1):39-45.
[92]Arrillaga I,Gil-Mascarell R,Gisbert C,et al.Expression of the yeast HAL2 gene in tomato increases the in vitro salt Tolerance of transgenic progenies.Plant Sci.1998.13(6):219-226.
[93]Bowler C,Slooten L,Vandenbranden S,et al.Manganese superoxide dismutase can reduce cellular damage mediated by oxygen radicals in transgenic.EMBO J,1991,10(2):1723-1732.
[94]Brito D E etal.Effect of compost on rhizospHere microflora of the tomato and on theincidence of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria.Applied and Environ.Microbiol.1995,61(1):194-199.
[95]Chen F S,Chen G Sand Zeng D H et al.The effect of peat and weathered coal on the growth of Pinus sylvfatris var.mongolica seedlings on Aeolian sandy soil.Journal of forest Research.2007,13(4):251-254.
[96]Fermando E.Prado,Cecilia Boero,Miriam Gallardo.Effect of NaCI on germination,growth,and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa Willd seeds.Bot.BuIl.Acad.Sin.2005,(41):27-34.
[97]Hasegawa,PMBressan,R.A,Zhu,J.K,et al.Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity.Annu.Rev,Plant Physiol.Plant Mol.Biol.2006,(1):463-499.
[98]牛治宇.国内外微生物肥料的概况与发展趋势[J].热带作物科技,1997,(2):16-18.
[99]何随成,江志阳,尹微等.生物有机肥对提高土壤肥力及作物品质等综合效果研究[J].腐植酸.2006,(1):39-44.
[100]黄锦法.生物有机复合肥的生产应用及其发展前景探讨[J].嘉兴农业.专辑1998:6-7.
[101]谢明杰,程爱华,曹文伟.我国微生物肥料的研究进展及发展趋势[J].微生物学杂志.2000,20(4):42-45.
[102]许前欣,孟兆芳,于彩虹.微生物肥料农业应用的效益评价[J].天津农业科学,2000,6(2):44-46.
[103]占新华,蒋延惠,徐阳春等.微生物制剂促进植物生长机理的研究进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报.1999,5(2):97-105.
[104]张锐等.有机肥在改良盐渍土中的作用[J].土壤肥料.1997,(4):11-14.
[105]高宝岩.生物肥料的作用及其应用前景分析[J].天津农业科技.2000,(1):27-28.
[106]郭春景,关兆红,李玉文等.生物有机肥料对人参重茬栽培地土壤微生态环境的影响研究[J].生物技术.2004,(14):55-56.
[107]Hemandez J A,CampolloA and Jinenez A.Response of antioxidant systems and leaf water relations to NaCI stress in pea plants[J].New Phytol.1991,141(2):241-251.
[108]Livia Simon-Sarkadi,Gabor Kocsy,Zoltan Sebestyen.Effect of salt stress on free aminoacid and polyamine content in cereals[J].Plant Physiology.2007,73-75.
[109]Promorse S B.The role of the microbe.J.of Applied Bacteriology[J].A review:Etheylene and agriculture.1979,4(6):1-25.
[110]Rodriguez HG,Boberts JKM,Jordan WR,Drew MC Growth,Water relations and accumulation of organic and inorganic studies in roots of Maize seedlings during salt stress[J].Plant Physiol.1997,11(3):881-893.
[111]Xu D,Duan X,Wang B,et al.Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene,HVA1,from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice[J].Plant Physiol.1996.,1(10):249-257.
[112]谢承陶,主编.盐碱土改良原理与作物抗性[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1993,120-181.
[113]谢承陶,等.有机肥改良盐碱土试验研究[J].土壤通报,1987,18(3):97-99.
[114]石元亮,王晶,等.有机物料改良苏打盐土机制的研究--对土壤化学组成及盐碱特性的影响[J].土壤通报,1989,20(4):154-157.
[115]严慧峻,逢焕成,李玉义,等.微生物复混肥对盐碱土及白菜品质改良的影响[J].土壤肥料科学,2008,24(12):270-273.
[116]黄强,殷志刚,田长彦,等.施有机肥条件下的土壤溶液盐分变化动态[J].干旱区研究,2001,18(1):53-56.
[117]吕爱英,王永歧,沈阿林,等6种微生物肥料在不同作物上的应用效果[J].河南农业科学,2004,4:49-51.
[118]王素英,陶光灿,谢光辉,等.我国微生物肥料的应用研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2003,8(1):14-18.
[119]李新平,李素俭.Cat No 5500欲分传感器测定土壤盐分的研究[J].西北农业大学学报,1997,25(3):25-27.
[120]张绍德,俞仁培.有机物料改良碱化土壤的作用[A].见:俞仁培,龙文瑞,主编.土壤盐化碱化的监测与防治[C].北京:科学出版社1993,97-106.
[121]吴薇.我国微生物肥料生产和应用现状的调查研究[J]微生物学通报,1995,22(2):104-107.
[122]黑龙江省土地管理局,黑龙江省土壤普查办公室.黑龙江土壤[M].北京:农业出版社,1992,277-278.
[123]王春裕,王汝镛.中国东北地区盐渍土的生态分区[J].土壤通报,1999,30(5):193-196.
[124]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原盐碱化草地改良治理的研究[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1995(1):110-114.
[125]李建东,郑慧莹.松嫩平原碱化草地的生态恢复及其优化模式[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1995(3):67-71.
[126]B.A.柯夫达著,席承藩等译.盐碱土的发生与演变[M].科学出版社,1957.130-133.
[127]李取生.松嫩平原苏打盐碱地治理与利用.资源科学.2003,25(1):15-20.
[128]盛连喜等.松嫩平原盐碱化土地的修复与调控研究.东北师大学报(自然科学版),2002,1(3):30-34.
[129]李崇皓 松嫩平原的植被[J]地理科学,1982,2(2):170-178.
[130]王文柱,张庆成.大庆农业资源与区划[M].哈尔滨.黑龙江科学出版社,1987:252-258.
[131]周有才,赵洪书.松嫩平原土壤水分动态的研究[J].土壤学报,1979,16(3):302-305.
[132]赵洪书.季节性冻土区的地下水状况及其研究方法[J].土壤学报,1981,18(4):389-394.
[133]Bao D L.Ameliorative influence of organic matter on biological activity of salt - affected soils[J].Arid Soil ResReh,1996,10(4):311-319.
[134]Kenneth K.Tanji.Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management.New York:American Society of Civil Engineers,2000,197-226.
[135]Abel,G.H.,Mackenzie,A.J.,Salt tolerance of soybean varieties during germination and later growth.Crop Sci.1964,(4):157-161.
[136]Epstein,E.,Grant,W.J.,Water stress relations of the potato plant under field conditions.Agron.J.1973,(65):400-404.
[137]Ferreira,I.,Katerji,N.,Is stomatal conductance in tomato crop controlled by soil or atmosphere? Oecologia 1992,(92):104-107.
[138]Hiler,E.A.,Clark,N,Stress day index to characterize effects of water stress on crop yields.Trans.ASAE 1971,(14):757-761.
[139]李酉开主编.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983:100-133
[140]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2000.
[141]土壤理化分析.中国科学院南京土壤研究所,1978,136-140.
[142]傅绍清,宋金玉.土壤有效磷的测定方法及其与磷素形态关系的研究[J].土壤学报,1982,19(3):305-310.
[143]顾益初,蒋柏藩.石灰性土壤无机磷分级的测定方法[J].土壤,1990,22(2):101-102.
[144]许光辉等.土壤微生物分析方法手册1986
[145]林启美.熏蒸法测定土壤微生物量(碳)的改进[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(2):63-66.
[146]王晶,解宏图等.土壤活性有机质(碳)的内涵和现代分析方法概述[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(6):109-112
[147]Chen S,Wang S,Altman A et al.Genotypic variation in drought tolerance of polar in relation to abscisic acid[J].Tree Physiology,1997,17(12):797-803.
[148]Chen S,Wang S,Huttermann A et al.Xylem abscisic acid accelerates leaf abscission by modulating polyamine and ethylene synthesis in water-stressed intact polar[J].Tree Structure and Function,2004,16(1):16-22.
[149]徐惠风,金研铭,张春祥等.向日葵叶片可溶性糖含量的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(1):23-25.
[150]杨国会,马尧,李如升,田永清.NaCl对甘草叶片脯氮酸含量以及质膜相对透性的影响[J].农业与技术,2000,20(5):43-45.
[151]陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导.广州:华南理工大学出版社2002,90-94
[152]沈慧娟,曾斌.干旱、低温胁迫对SOD,POD活性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16(4):54-57.
[153]郝再彬.植物生理实验.哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社2004,87-89.
[154]Zhang W H,Calos H,Prado B A.,et al.Analysis on the daily courses of water potential of nine woody species from Cerrado vegetation during wet season[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2005,11(1):7-12.
[155]Wei T X,Zhu J Z,Zhang X P.Soil water balance of protection forest in the loess plateau [J].Forestry Studies in China,1999,1(2):47-53.
[156]魏天兴,朱金兆,张学培.林分蒸散耗水量测定方法评述[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):85-91.
[157]王孟本,李洪建,柴宝峰,等.树种蒸腾作用、光合作用和蒸腾效率的比较研究[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(5):401-410.
[158]吕殿青,王文焰,王全九.入渗与蒸发条件下土壤水盐运移的研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):61-66.
[159]王春裕.诌议,土壤盐碱化的生态防治[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(6):67-71.
[160]张锐等.有机肥在改良盐渍土中的作用[J].土壤肥料.1997,(4):11-14.
[161]刘孝义.土壤物理及土壤改良研究法[J].土壤通报,1981,(5):21-23.
[162]李志丹,千友民等.牧草改良盐渍化土壤理化性质研究进展[J].草业科学,2004,21(6):17-20.
[163]倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗.土壤生物活性有机碳库及其表征指标研究[J].植物营养与施肥学报,2001,7(1):56-63.
[164]牛灵安,郝晋氓.盐渍土熟化过程中腐殖质特性的研究[J].土壤学报,2001,38(1):114- 122.
[165]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土腐殖质和几种酶活性的影响[J].植物研究.2003,23(2)211-214.
[166]范亚文.种植耐盐植物改良盐碱土的研究[D].东北林业大学博士论文2001,70-77.
[167]袁玲,杨邦俊,郑兰君,等.长期施肥对土壤酶活性和氮磷养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(4):300-306.
[168]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土壤氮素营养状况的影响[J].植物研究.2004,24(3)369-373.
[169]Bhatti A U,Khan Q,et al.Effect of Organic Manure and Properties and Crop Yield on Chemical Amendments on Soil a Salt[J].Afected Entiso Pedosphe,2005,15(1):46-51.
[170]杨莉琳,李金海.我国盐渍化土壤的营养与施肥效应研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(2):79-81
[171]占新华,蒋延惠,徐阳春等.微生物制剂促进植物生长机理的研究进展.植物营养与肥料学报.1999,5(2):97-105
[172]齐志勇.不同培肥模式对土壤呼吸和土壤养分变化影响的研究.硕士学位论文.东北农业大学2006,90-94.
[173]贾丙瑞,周广胜等.土壤微生物与根系呼吸作用影响因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1547-1552.
[174]闫德仁,人工林土壤腐殖质特性和土壤酶活性的研究[J].林业科技,1997,22(5):10-12.
[175]周礼恺.土壤酶学.北京:科学出版社,1987,69-90.
[176]丁宁平,周广业.酶活性在评价旱地土壤培肥效果中的作用[J].土壤通报,1990,21(6):269-271.
[177]Zhang Y L,Wang Y S.Soil enzyme activities with greenhouse subsurface irrigation[J].Pedosphere,2006,25(4):512-518.
[178]Yu S,Li Y,Wang J H,et al..Study on the soil microbial biomass as a bio-indicator of soil quality in the red earth ecosystem[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,1999,36(3):413-421.
[179]Joseph O D,Schjenning P,Sibbesen E,et al...Aggregation and organic matter fractions of three Nigerian soils as affected by soil disturbance and incorporation of plant material[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1999,50(2):105-114
[180]Theng B K G,Aislabie J,Fraser R.Bioavailability of phenanthrene intercalated into an alkylammonium montmorillonite clay[J].SoilBiBinnhem,2001,33:845-848.
[181]李东坡,武志杰,陈利军.土壤生物学活性对施入有机肥料的响应--土壤酶活性的响应[J].土壤通报,2003,34(5):463-468.
[182]张咏梅,周国逸,吴宁.土壤酶学的研究进展[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(1):83-90.
[183]徐长兴.施肥对砂姜黑土供磷能力的影响及磷肥后效[J].安徽农业科学,1999,27(1):38-41.
[184]郭晓冬,安战士.石灰性土壤中无机磷有效性的研究[J].土壤通报,1991,22(5):201-203.
[185]Al-Karki Ghazi N C.Barley response to salt stress to varied level of phosorus[J].Plant Nutr,1997,20(1):1635-1643.
[186]岳中辉,孙国荣,阎秀峰.不同改良方法对盐碱土壤磷素营养的影响[J].植物研究.2004,24(1)50-52.
[187]蒋柏藩,沈仁芳.土壤无机磷分级的研究[J].土壤学进展,2000,18(1):1-8.
[188]赵兰波,姜岩.土壤磷酸酶的方法探讨[J].土壤通报,1986,17(3):138-141.
[189]李志洪,陈丹,曹国军.黑土、黑钙土玉米苗期根际无机磷的形态变化[J].土壤学报,1999,36(1):127-131.
[190]孙国荣等.星星草的生长对盐碱土磷素营养的影响[J].草地学报,2004,12(4):337-339.
[191]孙国荣,阎秀峰,李晶.星星草对.土壤理化性质的影响[J].草地学报,2002,10(2):179-183.
[192]张晓琴,胡明贵.紫花苜蓿对盐渍化土地理化性质的影响[J].草业科学,2004,21(11):31-34.
[193]岳中辉,于东等.种植星星草对盐碱土壤氮素和磷素含量的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2003,34(3):266-269.
[194]王淑平,周广胜,吕育才.中国东北样带土壤碳、氮、磷的梯度分布及其与气候因子的关系[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):513-517.
[195]袁玲,杨邦俊,郑兰君,等.长期施肥对土壤酶活性和氮磷养分的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(4):300-306.
[196]周礼恺,张志明.土壤酶的测定方法[J].土壤通报,1980,11(5):37-38.
[197]章永松,林咸永.有机肥(物)土壤中磷的活化作用机理研究有机肥(物)对不同形态无机磷的活化作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):151-155.
[198]Gerke J.Kinetics of soil phosphate desorption as affected by citric acid[J].Z.P flanzenemahr.Bodenk,1994,15(7):17-22.
[199]Gerke Jorg.Phosphate,aluminium and iron in the soil solution of three different soils inrelation to varying concentrations of citric acid.[J].Z.Pflanzenernahr.Bodenk,1992,15(5):339-343.
[200]曹一平,崔健宇.石灰性土壤中油菜根际磷的化学动态及生物有效性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1994,1(试刊):49-54.
[201]章永松,林咸永.有机肥(物)土壤中磷的活化作用机理研究有机肥(物)分解产生的有机酸及其对不同形态磷的活化作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):151-155.
[202]史瑞和.江苏省几种土壤磷素状况和磷肥肥效[J].土壤学报,1962,10:374-379.
[203]顾益初,蒋柏藩,鲁如坤.风化对土壤粒级中磷素形态转化及其有效性的影响[J].土壤学报,1984,21(2):134-143.
[204]Sharpley A N,Smith S J.Fractionation of inorganic and organic phosphorus in virgin and cultivated soils[J].Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J,1985,49:127-130.
[205]Bowman R A,Cole C V.An exploratory method for fractionation of organic phosphorus from grassland soil[J].Soil Sci,1978,12(5):95-118.
[206]张锐,严慧峻,魏山庆,等.有机肥在改良盐渍上中的作用.土壤肥料,1997,23(4):11-14.
[207]吴薇等.我国微生物肥料生产和应用现状的调查研究[J]微生物学通报,1995,22(2):104-107.
[208]Bhatti A U,Khan Q,et al.Effect of Organic Manure and Properties and Crop Yield on Chemical Amendments on Soil a Salt[J].Afected Entiso Pedosphe,2005,15(1):46-51.
[209]贾丙瑞,周广胜等.土壤微生物与根系呼吸作用影响因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1547-1552.
[210]李灵.不同退化林地土壤微生物生物量动态.硕士学位论文.福建农林大学2004,100-105.
[211]胡江春等.植物根际菌PGPR的研究与应用.第二届全国微生物肥料生产应用技术研讨会论文集.江苏.2003,87-90.
[212]孟磊,丁维新等.长期定量施肥对土壤有机碳储量和土壤呼吸影响[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(6):687-691.
[213]邵月红,潘剑君,孙波.长期施肥对红壤不同形态碳的影响[J].中国生态农业学,2006,14(1):125-127.
[214]孙庚,吴宁,罗鹏.不同管理措施对川西北草地土壤氮和碳特征的影响[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(2):304-310.
[215]刘淑霞,刘景双,赵明东等.土壤活性有机碳与养分有效性及作物产量的关系[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(5):539-543.
[216]倪进治,徐建民.不同有机肥料对土壤生物活性有机质组分的动态影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(4):374-378.
[217]倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗.土壤轻组有机质[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2004,1(2):58-64.
[218]Grego rich E G,Janzen H H.Storage of soil carbon in the light fraction and macroorganic matter[J].Advances in soil science,1996,167-190.
[219]Janzen H H,Campbell C A,Brandt S A,et al..Light-fraction organicmatter in soils from long-term croprotations[J].Soil Sci,1992,56:1799-1806.
[220]胡诚,曹志平,叶钟年,等.不同的土壤培肥措施对低肥力农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响[J]生态学报,2006,26(3):808-814.
[221]刘文娜,吴文良等.不同土壤类型和农业用地方式对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(3):406-411.
[222]陈国潮,何振立,黄昌勇.红壤微生物量(碳)周转及其研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(2):152-160.
[223]陈四清,崔藐勇,周广胜等.内蒙古锡林河流域大针茅草原土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的CO_2排放速率研究[J].植物学报,1999,41(6):645-650.
[224]崔晓勇,陈四清,陈佐忠等.大针茅典型草原土壤CO_2排放规律的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):390-394.
[225]陈全胜,李凌志,韩兴国等.典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性和土壤水分的关系[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):831-835.
[226]董云社,齐玉春.草地生态系统碳循环过程研究进展[J].地理研究,2006,25(1):8-10.
[227]Roar D J.Protease activity and it's relationship to nitronen mineralization in some soil under pasture and ttusock nrassland.New Zealand Journal of Sciences,1997,22(2):179-185.
[228]安卫红,张淑民.石灰性土壤无机磷的分级及其有效性研究[J].土壤通报,1991,22(1):34-371.
[229]王文柱,张庆成.大庆农业资源与区划[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1987,252-258.
[230]王洪春.植物抗逆性与生物膜结构功能研究的进展,植物生理学通讯.1985,20(1):60-66.
[231]杜军华,冯桂莲.高溶盐胁迫对蚕豆叶绿素a和b含量的影响.青海师范大学学报.2000,38(4):36-38
[232]曹仪植,宋占午主编.植物生理学.兰州,兰州大学出版社1998:78-80.
[233]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京,高等教育出版社2000:120-124.
[234]林学政,沈继红,刘克斋,黄晓航.种植盐地碱蓬修复滨海盐渍土效果的研究[[J].海洋科学进展,2005,23(1):65-69.
[235]Voikmar K TrI,Hu Y,Steppuhn H.Physiological Responses of Plant Salinity[J].Plant Sci.,1998,78(1):19-27.
[236]Hanay A,et al.Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost[J].Compost Science&Utilization,2004,12(2):175-178.
[237]Zhang Y H.Desalination Effects of Salt tolerant Plants Growing in Alkali-saline Soil in Ningxia[J].Gansu Agr.Sci.and Tech.,2005,19(3):48-49.
[238]Karyotis T H,Iliadis C,Noulas C H,Mitsibonas T H.Preliminary Research on Seed Production and Nutrient Content for Certain Quinoa Varieties in a saline-sodic soil[J].Agronomy &Crop Science,2003,180(4):402-408.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |