大庆长垣以西地区青山口组层序地层及油气成藏特征研究
|
摘要
本项研究在经典层序地层学原理和方法指导下,综合利用地震、岩芯、录井、测井、地球化学等分析化验资料,建立了松辽盆地北部大庆长垣以西地区及松辽盆地南部邻区重点区块(红岗阶地)近1.5万平方公里的青山口组至准层序级所有探井及开发井统一层序地层格架,进而在该层序格架约束下对不同沉积体系及其储层特征、成藏条件进行了深入的分析,并预测了有利目标区带。本项研究对该区下一步油气勘探、开发具有重要的指导作用和借鉴价值。
结合密井网解剖,首次对松辽盆地北部大庆长垣以西地区及松辽盆地南部重点区块青山口组所有钻遇探井、开发井按照经典层序地层学原理进行区域统一层序地层对比。将目的层位青山口组划分为3个三级层序,自下而上依次为SQ3、SQ4、SQ5。上述各个三级层序均由水进体系域和高位体系域2个体系域构成,均缺少低位体系域,故青山口组包含6个体系域。其中,SQ3进一步划分为7个准层序,SQ4划分为5个准层序,SQ5划分为7个准层序。首次建立了松辽盆地大庆长垣以西地区青山口组至准层序级层序地层分层与各油田开发区块油层分层的对应关系,并建立了地层沉积模式。
首次应用重矿物等资料精细厘定了松辽盆地大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的物源体系。从区域沉积背景、物源体系分析及层序格架约束下的大比例尺沉积微相精细分析可知,工区主要受北部、西部和西北沉积体系控制。由于工区的北部是缓坡且属于远源沉积,北部沉积体系控制的三角洲体系的三角洲相带宽度明显比西部(属于陡坡且是相对远源沉积)和西北部(属于缓坡且是近源沉积)沉积体系控制的三角洲体系的三角洲相带宽。虽然同属三角洲前缘相带,但由于前述原因,造成北部沉积体系控制的地区沉积物粒度较细,多为粉砂岩、泥质粉砂岩(或各种含钙泥质粉砂岩)和泥岩组合,且上述各种岩性中介形虫含量特别多、还有部分成层介形虫;而西北沉积体系控制的沉积物的岩性则相应粗得多,甚至有很多井钻遇砾岩、含砾粗砂岩、粗砂岩等粒度较粗的岩性。工区内整个泰康隆起带和西部超覆带的大部分地区都受西北和西部沉积体系控制,沉积物粒度较北部沉积体系控制的沉积物粗,且西北部和西部沉积体系控制的地区平均砂地比比北部沉积体系控制的沉积体系高,砂体连通性好。但局部地区三角洲前缘末端及前三角洲在统一湖盆的改造下已经连在一起,很难区分;多物源、多沉积体系随时空演化的复杂性造成水域范围广大的古湖盆内沉积微相统一识别上的较大困难。通过层序及沉积特征的研究发现青山口组沉积时期,大庆长垣以西地区的沉积中心自下而上由北向南不断迁移,“最大湖泛面”对于不同沉积体系控制的大型湖盆来说是一个动态变化的理想面,并建立了统一湖盆不同沉积体系沉积模式。
通过众多典型油气藏解剖确定了本区发育的油气藏类型及其与层序格架的关系,研究区目的层主要发育构造、构造-岩性、微幅度构造、岩性-断层遮挡、断层-岩性及岩性等油气藏;构造因素起主导作用的油气藏可发育于各体系域中,岩性起主导作用的油气藏主要发育于SQ3的水进体系域中,其它因素起主导作用的油气藏主要发育于高位体系域中。通过层序格架内的成藏组合特征研究可知,烃源岩主要发育于水进体系域,储层主要发育于高位体系域,最大湖泛面附近发育的泥岩对水进和高位体系域的砂体都有较好的封闭作用。以体系域为单元剖析了大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的成藏条件和主控因素,本区主要有自生自储持续性供烃原生油藏成藏模式、西斜坡远源微幅度鼻状构造和断层岩性油气藏成藏模式及油源断裂成藏模式。以准层序为单元预测了大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的有利区带。准层序级层序地层格架对油气藏预测具有较好的指导作用。
Under the guidance of classic sequence stratigraphy principles and methods, this study comprehensively used seismic, core, logging, well logging, geochemical analytical data, etc. It established a unified sequence stratigraphic framework from Qingshankou formation to parasequence level including all exploration wells and development wells in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and adjacent key areas (Honggang terrace) south of Songliao Basin covered 15 thousand square kilometers. And within the constraints of the sequence framework we deeply analyzed different depositional systems, characteristics of the reservoir, and reservoir forming conditions. And then we forecast a favorable target zone. This study has an important guidance role and reference value on the next step oil-gas exploration and development in this area.
It is the first time that regional uniform sequence stratigraphic correlation was carried out to all exploration wells, development wells in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and key areas south of Songliao Basin according to the classical principles of sequence stratigraphy. The target zone of Qingshankou formation is divided into three third-order sequences, followed by bottom-up SQ3, SQ4, SQ5. Each of these three sequences is constituted by transgressive system tract and highstand system tract. There is no low stand system tract. So there are six system tract in Qingshankou formation. Where, SQ3 is further divided into seven parasequence, SQ4 divided into five parasequence, SQ5 divided into seven parasequence. And also corresponding relation between sequence formation classification from Qingshankou formation to parasequence level in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and oil strata division of oil fields development block was established for the first time,and stratigraphic sedimentary pattern was also established.
Data on heavy minerals was firstly applied to the redefinition of deposit source of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin. From regional deposition background, source analysis and large-scale sedimentary microfacies precise analysis constrained by sequence stratigraphic framework, we can find that, work area mainly affected by the north, northwest and western depositional system. As the northern part of work area is gentle slope and belongs to distant source deposition, delta phase zone width of delta system controlled by the north depositional system is wider than the west (of the steep slopes and is relatively far away from the source of deposition) and the north-west (of the gentle slope and is deposited near the source). Although same belongs to front delta facies zone, and the foregoing reasons, the north depositional system controlled areas sediment smaller grain size, mostly siltstone, shaly siltstone (or a variety of calcium-pelitic siltstone) and mudstone portfolio, and there are lots of ostracods in these lithology, some ostracods formed stratigraphy, and north-west of the lithology of depositional systems is correspondingly more coarse, coarse pebbly, coarse sandstone and fine sandstone, and so on. The whole Taikang uplift belt and the majority districts of the west overlap zone of work area are controlled by the north-west and west depositional systems. Sediment grain size is coarser than the north depositional system. Average sand versus ground value in the north-west and west depositional system controlled zones is higher than the north. Sandbody connectivity is good. However, some areas in the front delta phase zone have been linked together under a unified basin transformation, it is difficult to distinguish; the complexity of the multi-source, multi-sedimentary system evolution caused more difficult on the identification of a unified basin micro-facies. Through the study of sequence and sedimentary characteristics,we can find that during sedimentary period of Qingshankou formation,depocenter in the west of Daqing Placanticline gradually migrate from below to above and from north to south. While the“maximum flooding surface”is a dynamic changing ideal plane,as for large-scale lake basin controlled by different sedimentary system. We established sedimentary model of unified lake basin with different sedimentary system.
We defined the relationship between reservoir types developed in the study area and sequence framework by dissecting many typical oil and gas reservoirs. The purpose layer of the study area mainly developed structure, structure-lithology, tiny structure, lithology-fault sheltered,fault-lithology,lithology reservoir, and so on. Reservoirs that structural factors play a leading role can develop in all system tracts; Reservoirs that lithology factors play a leading role mainly develop in transgressive system tract in SQ3; Reservoirs controlled by other factors mostly develop in highstand system tract. Through the study of characteristics of reservoir combination in sequence framework, we learned that source rocks mainly develop in transgressive system tract, reservoirs in highstand system tract, and mudstones developed near maximum flooding surface have good sealing ability for sandstone in transgressive system tract and highstand system tract. Based on the unit of system tract, we analyzed the reservoir forming condition and main controlling factors of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline. It has a self-sustained self-storage continual hydrocarbon supply for the original reservoir accumulation model and distant source micro-amplitude nasal structure in the west slope, fault lithologic reservoir accumulation model, and oil-migrating fault reservoir accumulation model. Based on the unit of Parasequence, we predicted favorable zone of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline. Parasequence level sequence stratigraphic framework has a good guidence effection on reservoir prediction.
结合密井网解剖,首次对松辽盆地北部大庆长垣以西地区及松辽盆地南部重点区块青山口组所有钻遇探井、开发井按照经典层序地层学原理进行区域统一层序地层对比。将目的层位青山口组划分为3个三级层序,自下而上依次为SQ3、SQ4、SQ5。上述各个三级层序均由水进体系域和高位体系域2个体系域构成,均缺少低位体系域,故青山口组包含6个体系域。其中,SQ3进一步划分为7个准层序,SQ4划分为5个准层序,SQ5划分为7个准层序。首次建立了松辽盆地大庆长垣以西地区青山口组至准层序级层序地层分层与各油田开发区块油层分层的对应关系,并建立了地层沉积模式。
首次应用重矿物等资料精细厘定了松辽盆地大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的物源体系。从区域沉积背景、物源体系分析及层序格架约束下的大比例尺沉积微相精细分析可知,工区主要受北部、西部和西北沉积体系控制。由于工区的北部是缓坡且属于远源沉积,北部沉积体系控制的三角洲体系的三角洲相带宽度明显比西部(属于陡坡且是相对远源沉积)和西北部(属于缓坡且是近源沉积)沉积体系控制的三角洲体系的三角洲相带宽。虽然同属三角洲前缘相带,但由于前述原因,造成北部沉积体系控制的地区沉积物粒度较细,多为粉砂岩、泥质粉砂岩(或各种含钙泥质粉砂岩)和泥岩组合,且上述各种岩性中介形虫含量特别多、还有部分成层介形虫;而西北沉积体系控制的沉积物的岩性则相应粗得多,甚至有很多井钻遇砾岩、含砾粗砂岩、粗砂岩等粒度较粗的岩性。工区内整个泰康隆起带和西部超覆带的大部分地区都受西北和西部沉积体系控制,沉积物粒度较北部沉积体系控制的沉积物粗,且西北部和西部沉积体系控制的地区平均砂地比比北部沉积体系控制的沉积体系高,砂体连通性好。但局部地区三角洲前缘末端及前三角洲在统一湖盆的改造下已经连在一起,很难区分;多物源、多沉积体系随时空演化的复杂性造成水域范围广大的古湖盆内沉积微相统一识别上的较大困难。通过层序及沉积特征的研究发现青山口组沉积时期,大庆长垣以西地区的沉积中心自下而上由北向南不断迁移,“最大湖泛面”对于不同沉积体系控制的大型湖盆来说是一个动态变化的理想面,并建立了统一湖盆不同沉积体系沉积模式。
通过众多典型油气藏解剖确定了本区发育的油气藏类型及其与层序格架的关系,研究区目的层主要发育构造、构造-岩性、微幅度构造、岩性-断层遮挡、断层-岩性及岩性等油气藏;构造因素起主导作用的油气藏可发育于各体系域中,岩性起主导作用的油气藏主要发育于SQ3的水进体系域中,其它因素起主导作用的油气藏主要发育于高位体系域中。通过层序格架内的成藏组合特征研究可知,烃源岩主要发育于水进体系域,储层主要发育于高位体系域,最大湖泛面附近发育的泥岩对水进和高位体系域的砂体都有较好的封闭作用。以体系域为单元剖析了大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的成藏条件和主控因素,本区主要有自生自储持续性供烃原生油藏成藏模式、西斜坡远源微幅度鼻状构造和断层岩性油气藏成藏模式及油源断裂成藏模式。以准层序为单元预测了大庆长垣以西地区青山口组的有利区带。准层序级层序地层格架对油气藏预测具有较好的指导作用。
Under the guidance of classic sequence stratigraphy principles and methods, this study comprehensively used seismic, core, logging, well logging, geochemical analytical data, etc. It established a unified sequence stratigraphic framework from Qingshankou formation to parasequence level including all exploration wells and development wells in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and adjacent key areas (Honggang terrace) south of Songliao Basin covered 15 thousand square kilometers. And within the constraints of the sequence framework we deeply analyzed different depositional systems, characteristics of the reservoir, and reservoir forming conditions. And then we forecast a favorable target zone. This study has an important guidance role and reference value on the next step oil-gas exploration and development in this area.
It is the first time that regional uniform sequence stratigraphic correlation was carried out to all exploration wells, development wells in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and key areas south of Songliao Basin according to the classical principles of sequence stratigraphy. The target zone of Qingshankou formation is divided into three third-order sequences, followed by bottom-up SQ3, SQ4, SQ5. Each of these three sequences is constituted by transgressive system tract and highstand system tract. There is no low stand system tract. So there are six system tract in Qingshankou formation. Where, SQ3 is further divided into seven parasequence, SQ4 divided into five parasequence, SQ5 divided into seven parasequence. And also corresponding relation between sequence formation classification from Qingshankou formation to parasequence level in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin and oil strata division of oil fields development block was established for the first time,and stratigraphic sedimentary pattern was also established.
Data on heavy minerals was firstly applied to the redefinition of deposit source of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline north of Songliao Basin. From regional deposition background, source analysis and large-scale sedimentary microfacies precise analysis constrained by sequence stratigraphic framework, we can find that, work area mainly affected by the north, northwest and western depositional system. As the northern part of work area is gentle slope and belongs to distant source deposition, delta phase zone width of delta system controlled by the north depositional system is wider than the west (of the steep slopes and is relatively far away from the source of deposition) and the north-west (of the gentle slope and is deposited near the source). Although same belongs to front delta facies zone, and the foregoing reasons, the north depositional system controlled areas sediment smaller grain size, mostly siltstone, shaly siltstone (or a variety of calcium-pelitic siltstone) and mudstone portfolio, and there are lots of ostracods in these lithology, some ostracods formed stratigraphy, and north-west of the lithology of depositional systems is correspondingly more coarse, coarse pebbly, coarse sandstone and fine sandstone, and so on. The whole Taikang uplift belt and the majority districts of the west overlap zone of work area are controlled by the north-west and west depositional systems. Sediment grain size is coarser than the north depositional system. Average sand versus ground value in the north-west and west depositional system controlled zones is higher than the north. Sandbody connectivity is good. However, some areas in the front delta phase zone have been linked together under a unified basin transformation, it is difficult to distinguish; the complexity of the multi-source, multi-sedimentary system evolution caused more difficult on the identification of a unified basin micro-facies. Through the study of sequence and sedimentary characteristics,we can find that during sedimentary period of Qingshankou formation,depocenter in the west of Daqing Placanticline gradually migrate from below to above and from north to south. While the“maximum flooding surface”is a dynamic changing ideal plane,as for large-scale lake basin controlled by different sedimentary system. We established sedimentary model of unified lake basin with different sedimentary system.
We defined the relationship between reservoir types developed in the study area and sequence framework by dissecting many typical oil and gas reservoirs. The purpose layer of the study area mainly developed structure, structure-lithology, tiny structure, lithology-fault sheltered,fault-lithology,lithology reservoir, and so on. Reservoirs that structural factors play a leading role can develop in all system tracts; Reservoirs that lithology factors play a leading role mainly develop in transgressive system tract in SQ3; Reservoirs controlled by other factors mostly develop in highstand system tract. Through the study of characteristics of reservoir combination in sequence framework, we learned that source rocks mainly develop in transgressive system tract, reservoirs in highstand system tract, and mudstones developed near maximum flooding surface have good sealing ability for sandstone in transgressive system tract and highstand system tract. Based on the unit of system tract, we analyzed the reservoir forming condition and main controlling factors of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline. It has a self-sustained self-storage continual hydrocarbon supply for the original reservoir accumulation model and distant source micro-amplitude nasal structure in the west slope, fault lithologic reservoir accumulation model, and oil-migrating fault reservoir accumulation model. Based on the unit of Parasequence, we predicted favorable zone of Qingshankou formation in the west of Daqing Placanticline. Parasequence level sequence stratigraphic framework has a good guidence effection on reservoir prediction.
引文
[1]王璞珺,高有峰,程日辉等.松科1井南孔白垩系青山口组二、三段沉积序列精细描述:岩石地层、沉积相与旋回地层[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2009,16(2):288～313.
[2]大庆油田石油地质志编辑委员会.中国石油地质志(卷一)-大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[3]董万百,廖宗廷等.大庆安达地区青山口组生烃条件及油气来源探讨[J].上海地质,2001,(2):41～44.
[4]张枝焕,吴聿元,俞凯等.松辽盆地长岭地区烃源岩地球化学特征[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(6):501～507.
[5]王彦美,熊永强,王立武等.松辽盆地南部上白垩统烃源岩和原油中正构烷烃的氢同位素组成研究[J],地球化学,2006,35(6):602～608.
[6]王雪.松辽盆地齐家凹陷与大庆长垣扶杨油层油源[J],石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):294～298.
[7]孙钰,钟建华,王志坤等.长岭凹陷晚白垩系烃源岩有机相研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2006,28(4):171～175.
[8]王杰,王铁冠,陈践发等.松辽盆地双城-太平川地区烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J],矿物岩石,2006,26(3):100～106.
[9]冯子辉,方伟,张居和等.松辽盆地烃源岩中高分子量(C+40)烷烃系列组成及分布特征[J],中国科学D辑地球科学,2007,37(9):1150～1162.
[10]卢双舫,许凤鸣,申家年等.松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷凝析油气藏成因[J],地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2007,32(2):209～212.
[11]申家年,邓冰,卢双舫.齐家古龙凹陷凝析油气的地球化学剖析与油源对比及其启示[J].地球化学,2007,36(6):539～548.
[12]康立明,任战利,崔军平等.松辽盆地北部宾参1井白垩系烃源岩的认识和评价及其意义[J].地学前缘,2007,14(6):257～266.
[13]尹秀珍,万晓樵,司家亮.松辽盆地G_12井晚白垩世青山口组沉积时期古湖泊学替代指标分析[J].地质学报,2008,82(5):676～682.
[14]孙钰,孙贺龙.松辽盆地南部长岭凹陷上白垩统沉积有机相研究[J],应用基础与工程科学学报,2008,16(4):537～545.
[15]席党鹏,尹秀珍,崔莹等.松辽盆地中部青山口组-姚家组界线上下的古湖泊特征及古气候响应[J],微体古生物学报,2008,25(3):266～273.
[16]吕延防,万军,刘江涛等.用灰色理论预测齐家-古龙凹陷中心线以西油气储量分布[J],吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38(3):425～429.
[17]卢双舫,李娇娜,刘绍军等.松辽盆地生油门限重新厘定及其意义[J],石油勘探与开发,2009,36(2):166～173.
[18]吕延防,张绍臣,王亚明等.盖层封闭能力与盖层厚度的定量关系[J].石油学报,2000,21(2):27～30.
[19]向才富,冯志强,吴河勇等.松辽盆地异常压力系统及其形成原因探讨[J].地质学报,2006,80(11):1752～1759.
[20]王震亮,刘林玉,于轶星等.松辽盆地南部腰英台地区青山口组油气运移、成藏机理[J].地质学报,2007,81(3):419～427.
[21]施立志,吴河勇,林铁锋等.松辽盆地大庆长垣及其以西地区扶杨油层油气运移特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):21～26.
[22]卢双舫,纪贤伟,王跃文等.松辽盆地滨北区油气运移与油源对比[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(2):1～3.
[23]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2):355～360.
[24]付秀丽,庞雄奇.松辽盆地北部青一段烃源岩排烃特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(1):166～169.
[25]罗群,宋子学.油气沿断裂向下幕式运移的机理[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(2):170～171.
[26]付广,姜振学,吕延防等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷青山口组源岩吸附气量及其地质意义[J].大庆石油学院学报,1994,18(4):15～18.
[27]姜振学,付广,梁海龙.三肇地区青山口组泥岩盖层封气有效性研究[J].大庆石油学院学报,1996,20(2):19～23.
[28]白新华,付广,陈章明等.两江地区青山口组泥岩封盖能力及对油气控制作用[J].石油学报,1998,19(2):28～31.
[29]王建功,卫平生,史永苏等.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区大规模岩性油气藏和地层超覆油气藏成藏条件.[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):27～30.
[30]付广,王有功,苏玉平等.用超压释放法确定烃源岩排烃期次-以古龙凹陷青山口组为例[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(5):538～541.
[31]杨光.松辽盆地南部油气成藏期研究-以黑帝庙地区为例[J].世界地质,2008,27(1):53～58.
[32]付广,杜影.从源盖时间匹配关系对比大庆长垣两侧扶、杨油层天然气远景[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(3):1～4.
[33]付广,刘博,吕延防.泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):21～26.
[34]付广,李晓伟.源外上生下储成藏主控因素及有利区预测-以松辽盆地尚家地区泉二段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):1～5.
[35]李彦芳,窦惠,王永兴等.松辽盆地英台扇三角洲复合体控制因素及沉积过程[J].大庆石油学院学报,1992,16(2):109～114.
[36]郭少斌,匡立春,杜旭东.综合利用测井曲线研究英台地区沉积微相-以青三段二砂组为例[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(4):36～41.
[37]王立武,李建忠,王兆云等.松辽盆地保乾三角洲前缘带演变及其勘探意义[J].沉积学报,2003,21(3):404～408.
[38]卫平生,王建功,潘树新等.河口坝、沿岸坝的形成及成藏机制以松辽盆地西、南部沉积体系为例[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(6):592～595.
[39]张大伟,贾庆素.大情字井地区青一段沉积微相分布特征[J].断块油气田,2006,13(6):1～3.
[40]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴等.松辽盆地南部青山口组湖相风暴沉积[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,34(1):12～16.
[41]魏兆胜,宋新民,唐振兴等.大情字井地区上白垩统青山口组沉积相与岩性油藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(1):28～33.
[42]王国栋,程日辉,王璞珺等.松辽盆地嫩江组白云岩形成机理-以松科1井南孔为例[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):48～54.
[43]单玄龙,胡金祥,任利军等.松辽盆地乾安地区青山口组三段沉积微相特征[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):65～71.
[44]王树恒,卢双舫,杨善民.松辽盆地北部西斜坡青二、三段四级层序C1水进域沉积微相特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(2):16～19.
[45]郭峰,陈世悦,王德海等.松辽盆地滨北地区白垩系泉头组-嫩江组沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(1):40～44.
[46]高有峰,王璞珺,程日辉等.松科1井南孔白垩系青山口组一段沉积序列精细描述:岩石地层、沉积相与旋回地层[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2009,16(2):314～323.
[47]张世奇,孙耀庭,刘金华等.气候变化对可容空间及层序发育的影响[J].海洋地质动态,2003,21(2):324～327.
[48]张立平,王东坡.松辽盆地白垩纪古气候特征及其变化机制[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(1):11～16.
[49]黄清华,郑玉龙,杨明杰等.松辽盆地白垩纪古气候研究[J].微体古生物学报,1999,16(1):95～103.
[50]李延平,林振宏,陈树民等.闭流坳陷湖盆的气候层序[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2007,27(6):91～96.
[51]马立祥,万静萍,钱奕中.松江盆地中白垩世两次湖侵沉积在层序地层学研究中的意义[J].大庆右油地质与开发,1992,11(1):10～13.
[52]王璞珺,杜小弟,王东坡.松辽盆地白垩纪湖侵沉积层序与湖海沟通事件的地球化学记录[J].岩相古地理,1995,15(4):14～20
[53]王璞珺,王东坡,杜小弟等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组黑色页岩的形成环境及海水侵入的底流模式[J].岩相古地理,1996,16(1):34～43.
[54]叶淑芬,魏魁生.松辽盆地白垩系的密集段及海水进侵的新证[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1996,21(3):267～271.
[55]黄福堂,迟元林,黄清华.松辽盆地中白垩世海侵事件质疑[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):104～109.
[56]王璞珺、Schneider Werner、Mattern Frank,等.陆相盆地中的海侵层序特征:中欧盆地三叠系与松辽盆地白垩系对比研究[J].矿物岩石,2002,22(2):47～53.
[57]王成善.白垩纪地球表层系统重大地质事件与温室气候变化研究-从重大地质事件探寻地球表层系统耦合[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(7):838～842.
[58]陈雪凝、陆永潮、吴河勇.白垩纪大洋沉积转变期间松辽盆地的沉积响应[J].天然气勘探与开方发,2007,30(3):32～36.
[59]黄永建,王成善,顾健.白垩纪大洋缺氧事件:研究进展与未来展望[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):21～30.
[60]辛仁臣,王英民.松辽盆地北部青山口-姚家组西部坡折带成因及演化[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2004,29(5):621～624.
[61]王建功,卫平生,郑浚茂,等.挠曲坡折带特征与油气勘探-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].石油学报,2005,26(2):26～29.
[62]王颖,王英民,赵志魁等.松辽盆地南部泉头组四段-姚家组西部坡折带的成因及演化[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):33～36.
[63]王颖,王英民,王晓洲,等.松辽盆地西部坡折带的成因演化及其对地层分布模式的控制作用[J].沉积学报,2005,23(3):498～506.
[64]杜江峰,刘招君,董清水等.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区晚白垩世坳陷盆地坡折带研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):170～176.
[65]赵志魁.坳陷盆地缓坡坡折带与非构造圈闭形成研究-松辽盆地西部斜坡区隐蔽性油藏成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[66]黄薇,王建功,赵应成等.松辽盆地坳陷期坡折带特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):31～35.
[67]辛仁臣,张雪辉,张翼等.湖盆无曝露缓坡带层序界面特征及成因-以松辽盆地他拉哈地区上白垩统为例[J].沉积学报,2008,26(1):77～85.
[68]叶得泉,张莹.黑龙江省古龙及邻区高台子油层介形类分布特征及其生物相[J].沉积学报,1995,12(3):241～250.
[69]黄清华,陈春瑞,王平在等.松辽盆地晚白垩世生物演化与古湖泊缺氧事件[J].微体古生物学报,1998,15(4):417～425.
[70]万晓樵,李罡,陈丕基等.松辽盆地白垩纪青山口阶的同位素地层标志及其与海相Cenomanian阶的对比[J].地质学报,2005,79(2):150～156.
[71]崔莹,席党鹏,万晓樵.大庆油田徐22井青山口组-姚家组微体生物及其古气候响应[J].现代地质,2007,21(3):484～490.
[72]吴怀春,张世红,黄清华.中国东北松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组浮动天文年代标尺的建立[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2008,15(4):159～169.
[73]刘万洙,王璞珺,高有峰等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组核形石的发现及其环境意义[J].地质学报,2008,82(5):594～600.
[74]杨玉芳,钟建华,曾石岐等.松辽盆地早白垩世青山口组核形石的特征及其环境意义[J].地质学报,2009,83(4):558～569.
[75]王璞珺,杜小弟,王俊等.松辽盆地白垩纪年代地层研究及地层时代划分[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372～381.
[76]魏魁生,徐怀大,叶淑芬等.松辽盆地白垩系高分辨率层序地层格架[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(1):7～14.
[77]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析-以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):139～144.
[78]魏志平,唐振兴,江涛等.长岭凹陷层序地层分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):170～173.
[79]厉玉乐,张银国,陈建文.松辽盆地北部泰康-西超地区层序地层分析[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(6):694～700.
[80]朱筱敏,康安,王贵文.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):283～287.
[81]辛仁臣,蔡希源,王英民.松辽坳陷深水湖盆层序界面特征及低位域沉积模式,沉积学报,2004,22(3):387～392
[82]王建功,卫平生,杨建礼等.松辽盆地西南部青山口组三段底界不整合面与油气分布[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):566～573.
[83]王启飞,陈丕基.白垩纪年代地层学研究简述[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(2):114～123.
[84]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴等.松辽盆地南部坳陷期层序地层研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):1～7.
[85]李树青,李和,徐伟等.松辽盆地南部下白垩统层序构型及沉积特征[J].天然气工业,2007,27(4):36～39.
[86]林春明,冯志强,张顺等.松辽盆地北部白垩纪超层序特征[J].古地理学报,2007,9(6):619～634.
[87]赵波,张顺,林春明等.松辽盆地坳陷期湖盆层序地层研究[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(2):159～168.
[88]辛仁臣,张翼,张春卉等.松辽盆地中部含油组合高精度层序地层格架分析[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(4):389～396.
[89]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):50～60.
[90]梁春秀,王永春,康伟力等.现代勘探新技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的作用-松辽盆地大情字井超亿吨级油田的发现[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):50～57.
[91]顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):484～490.
[92]柏涛,徐志伟.层序地层学在隐蔽圈闭预测中的应用-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(1):73～78.
[93]邹才能,薛叔浩,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部白垩系泉头组-嫩江组沉积层序特征与地层-岩性油气藏形成条件[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):14～17.
[94]王建功,卫平生,郑浚茂等.挠曲坡折带特征与油气勘探-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].石油学报,2005,26(2):26～29.
[95]杨会东,王书平,马玉天等.高精度层序地层技术在松辽盆地南部隐蔽油藏勘探中的应用[J].石油学报,2005,26(3):40～43.
[96]邹才能,陶士振,谷志东.陆相坳陷盆地层序地层格架下岩性地层圈闭、油藏类型与分布规律-以松辽盆地白垩系泉头组-嫩江组为例[J].地质科学,2006,41(4):711～719.
[97]卫平生,潘树新,王建功等.湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究-论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):27～31.
[98]王建功,王天奇,卫平生等.松辽盆地青山口组三段底界不整合面的发现及石油地质学意义[J].地质学报,2009,83(1):78～88.
[99]李群,李小春,穆乃彬.松辽盆地南部大情字井地区层序地层及隐蔽油气藏预测[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):18～21.
[100]徐怀大,王世凤,陈开远.地震地层学解释基础[M]北京:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[101]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望[J].海相油气地质,2001,6(4):15～25.
[102] L. L.Sloss. Stratigraphic models in exploration: AAPG Bulletin[J]. 1962,v. 46, p. 1050~ 1057.
[103] L.L.Sloss.Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America.Geol.Soc.Am.Bull. [J]. 1962,74,93~113.
[104] Vail P R, Mitchum R M Jr,Todd R G, et al. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level.In:Payton C E, ed. Seismic stratigraphy-application of hydrocarbon exploration[J]. AAPG Memoir,1977,26:49-212.
[105] R.M.Mitchum,et al.Seismic stratigraphy and Global Changes of Sea Level,Part 2:the Depositional Sequence as a Basic Unit for Stratigraphic Analysis.In : Payton C.E.ed..Seismic Stratigraphy.AAPG,Memoir 26,1977,53~62.
[106] C.E.佩顿编.地震地层学(在油气勘探中的应用)[M].牛毓荃,徐怀大,陈俊生等译.北京:石油工业出版社,1980.
[107]蔡希源,李思田,樊太亮等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学-隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.1-2.
[108]聂逢君.层序地层学的起源及其发展[J].铀矿地质,2001,17(6):193~202.
[109]侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层学的研究进展[J].矿物岩石,2001,21(3):128~134.
[110]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):8~13.
[111] P.R.Vail,J.B.Sangree著.应用层序地层学[M].张宏逵等译.东营:石油大学出版社,1991.17-27.
[112]郝黎明,邵龙义.基于层序地层格架的有机相研究进展[J].地质科技情报,2000,19(4):60~64.
[113]王正文,赵追,李峰等.陆相盆地层序地层学研究现状及发展趋势[J].河南石油,2002,16(3):8~11.
[114]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1.
[115] P.R.Vail,etal. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level [J]. AAPG, 1977, Memoir 26.
[116] P.R.Vail,J.b.Sangree. Annual Convention short course: Sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic well and outcrop data [C]. March19,1988 Houston,Texas.
[117]郭建华,朱美衡,刘辰生等.陆相断陷盆地湖平面变化曲线与层序地层学框架模式讨论[J].矿物岩石,2005,25(2):87~92.
[118] J.C.Van Wagoner,etal.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. In: C. W. Bally(ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy.AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):11~14.
[119] P.R.Vail.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy.Part1 : Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure, In:C. W. Bally (ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy. AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):1-10.
[120] C. W. Wilgus,et al.(eds.).Sea Level Changes. An Integrated Approach SEPM Special Publication 42,1988.
[121]徐强,姜烨,董伟良,等.中国层序地层研究现状和发展方向, [J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):155~167.
[122]薛良清.成因层序地层学的回顾与展望[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):484~488.
[123]郭东晓,罗啸泉.层序地层学研究在国内的进展[J].四川地质学报,1997,17(2):92～95.
[124]池秋鄂,龚福华编著.层序地层学基础与应用[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[125] H.W.Posamentier and R.D.Erskine. () Seismic expression and recognition criteria of ancient submarine fans. In::Seismic Facies and Sedimentary Processes of Modern and Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems (ed.by P.Weimer and M.H.Link). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991,pp.197～222.
[126]魏魁生,徐怀大.二连盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序地层学特征[J].地球科学,1994,19(2):181～193.
[127] G.Dam,F.Surlyk.. Cyclic sedimentation in a large wave and storm-dominated anoxic lake; Kap Stewart Formation (Rhaethian-Sinemurian), Jameson Land, East Greenland. In: Posamentier H.W, Summerhayes C.P. Haq B.U, Allen G.P (eds) Sequence stratigraphy and facies associations. Int Assoc Sediment Spec Pual(Blackwell).1993,18: 419～448.
[128]徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题[J].石油与天然气地质.1997,18(2):83～89.
[129]夏文臣.华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1994,19(1):19～28.
[130] J.C.Van Wagoner , G.T.Bertram(Eds.).Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits,vol. 64. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir.1995,487pp.
[131]解习农.松辽盆地梨树凹陷深部断裂沉积体系及层序地层特征[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):144～150.
[132]胡受权.泌阳断陷陆相层序外部构型研究.现代地质[J].1998,12(4):567～574.
[133]桑树勋,秦勇,范炳恒等.层序地层学在陆相盆地煤层气资源评价中的应用研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(2):113～118.
[134]林承焰,张宪国,董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用.石油学报[J].2007,28(2):69～72.
[135]陆永潮,杜学斌,陈平,等.油气精细勘探的主要方法体系-地震沉积学研究.石油试验地质[J].2008,30(1):1～5.
[136]吴因业,顾家裕,施和生,等.从层序地层学到地震沉积学-全国第5届油气层序地层学大会综述.石油试验地质[J].2008,30(3):217～220.
[137] T.A.Cross.High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodations[A].In : Proceedings of Northwestern European Sequence Stratigrapgy Congress[C].1994.105~123.
[138] J.C.Van Wagoner etal. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops:concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series,7,1990.1-155.
[139]邓宏文.美国层序研究中的新学派-高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89~97.
[140] T.A.Cross. Stratigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(4):322～332.
[141]薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清等.湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[142]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96～102.
[143]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):9095.
[144]郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].沉积学报,1998,16( 2):42～49.
[145]杜春艳,郑荣才.陕北长6油层组短期基准面旋回与储层非均质性的关系[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):17～22.
[146]郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):348～356.
[147]吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):375～381.
[148]柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):50～56.
[149]尹太举.高分辩率层序地层学及其在濮城油田开发中的应用[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2002.8～20.
[150]王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文.东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段高分辨率层序地层与岩性圈闭特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版)2004,28(4):7～11.
[151]易定红,田光荣.杏树岗-太平屯地区扶杨油层层序地层研究[J].新疆石油地址,2004,25(6):607～609.
[152]邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏,Timothy A. Cross.河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):373～379.
[153]林畅松,刘景彦,刘丽军等.高精度层序地层分析:建立沉积相和储层规模的等时地层格架[J].现代地质,2002,16(3):276～281.
[154]王中良.大庆油田北三西葡一油组高精度层序地层学研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2006.
[155]张守昌,李晨,张泽慧等.地震技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(3):13～15.
[156] H. W.Posamentier and P. R. Vail,Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II-sequence and systems tract models,in C. K.Wilgus,B. S. Hastings,C. G. St.C. Kendall,H. W. Posamentier, C. A. Ross,and J. C. Van Wagoner,eds.,Sea level changes:an integrated approach:SEPM Special Publication 42,1988:p.125–154.
[157] Keith W. Shanley and Peter J. McCabe. Perspectives on the Sequence Stratigraphy ofContinental Strata AAPG Bulletin,V. 78,No. 4 (April 1994),P. 544–568.
[158] J.C.Van Wagoner,G.T.Bertram,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland deposits:outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America [C].AAPG Memoir,1995,64:137～223.
[159]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析-以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2),139~144.
[160]蔡雄飞,李长安,占车生.陆相盆地地层研究进展[J].地学前缘,1999,6(4):407.
[161]刘招君,郭巍,董清水等.湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式-以松辽盆地西部斜坡区为例[J].长春地质学院学报,1997,27(增刊Ⅱ) :54～60.
[162]刘招君,董清水,郭巍,等.断陷湖盆层序地层特征及模式-以松辽盆地梨树断陷为例[J].长春科技大学学报,1998,28(1):54～58.
[163]胡受权,颜其彬.泌阳断陷双河-赵凹地区陆相层序地层学模式[J].地质科学,1998,33(4):435～446.
[164]解习农,陆永潮,任建业,等.松辽盆地层序地层格架和中浅层沉积体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[165]赵志魁.坳陷盆地缓坡坡折带与非构造圈闭形成研究-松辽盆地西部斜坡区隐蔽性油藏成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[166]王书宝,孙钰,钟建华,等.松辽盆地晚白垩世古气候变化对层序发育的影响[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(4):29～32.
[167]纪友亮,张世奇,张宏等.层序地层原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.1-116.
[168]刘立,王东坡.湖相油页岩的沉积环境及其层序地层学意义[J].石油实验地质,1996,18(3):311～316.
[169]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学理论及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-130.
[170]朱筱敏,康安,谢庆宾.内蒙古钱家店凹陷侏罗系层序地层与岩性圈闭[J]石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):48-52.
[171]薛良清.湖相盆地中的层序、体系域与隐蔽油气藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):115～120.
[2]大庆油田石油地质志编辑委员会.中国石油地质志(卷一)-大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[3]董万百,廖宗廷等.大庆安达地区青山口组生烃条件及油气来源探讨[J].上海地质,2001,(2):41～44.
[4]张枝焕,吴聿元,俞凯等.松辽盆地长岭地区烃源岩地球化学特征[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(6):501～507.
[5]王彦美,熊永强,王立武等.松辽盆地南部上白垩统烃源岩和原油中正构烷烃的氢同位素组成研究[J],地球化学,2006,35(6):602～608.
[6]王雪.松辽盆地齐家凹陷与大庆长垣扶杨油层油源[J],石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):294～298.
[7]孙钰,钟建华,王志坤等.长岭凹陷晚白垩系烃源岩有机相研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2006,28(4):171～175.
[8]王杰,王铁冠,陈践发等.松辽盆地双城-太平川地区烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J],矿物岩石,2006,26(3):100～106.
[9]冯子辉,方伟,张居和等.松辽盆地烃源岩中高分子量(C+40)烷烃系列组成及分布特征[J],中国科学D辑地球科学,2007,37(9):1150～1162.
[10]卢双舫,许凤鸣,申家年等.松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷凝析油气藏成因[J],地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2007,32(2):209～212.
[11]申家年,邓冰,卢双舫.齐家古龙凹陷凝析油气的地球化学剖析与油源对比及其启示[J].地球化学,2007,36(6):539～548.
[12]康立明,任战利,崔军平等.松辽盆地北部宾参1井白垩系烃源岩的认识和评价及其意义[J].地学前缘,2007,14(6):257～266.
[13]尹秀珍,万晓樵,司家亮.松辽盆地G_12井晚白垩世青山口组沉积时期古湖泊学替代指标分析[J].地质学报,2008,82(5):676～682.
[14]孙钰,孙贺龙.松辽盆地南部长岭凹陷上白垩统沉积有机相研究[J],应用基础与工程科学学报,2008,16(4):537～545.
[15]席党鹏,尹秀珍,崔莹等.松辽盆地中部青山口组-姚家组界线上下的古湖泊特征及古气候响应[J],微体古生物学报,2008,25(3):266～273.
[16]吕延防,万军,刘江涛等.用灰色理论预测齐家-古龙凹陷中心线以西油气储量分布[J],吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38(3):425～429.
[17]卢双舫,李娇娜,刘绍军等.松辽盆地生油门限重新厘定及其意义[J],石油勘探与开发,2009,36(2):166～173.
[18]吕延防,张绍臣,王亚明等.盖层封闭能力与盖层厚度的定量关系[J].石油学报,2000,21(2):27～30.
[19]向才富,冯志强,吴河勇等.松辽盆地异常压力系统及其形成原因探讨[J].地质学报,2006,80(11):1752～1759.
[20]王震亮,刘林玉,于轶星等.松辽盆地南部腰英台地区青山口组油气运移、成藏机理[J].地质学报,2007,81(3):419～427.
[21]施立志,吴河勇,林铁锋等.松辽盆地大庆长垣及其以西地区扶杨油层油气运移特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):21～26.
[22]卢双舫,纪贤伟,王跃文等.松辽盆地滨北区油气运移与油源对比[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(2):1～3.
[23]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2):355～360.
[24]付秀丽,庞雄奇.松辽盆地北部青一段烃源岩排烃特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(1):166～169.
[25]罗群,宋子学.油气沿断裂向下幕式运移的机理[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(2):170～171.
[26]付广,姜振学,吕延防等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷青山口组源岩吸附气量及其地质意义[J].大庆石油学院学报,1994,18(4):15～18.
[27]姜振学,付广,梁海龙.三肇地区青山口组泥岩盖层封气有效性研究[J].大庆石油学院学报,1996,20(2):19～23.
[28]白新华,付广,陈章明等.两江地区青山口组泥岩封盖能力及对油气控制作用[J].石油学报,1998,19(2):28～31.
[29]王建功,卫平生,史永苏等.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区大规模岩性油气藏和地层超覆油气藏成藏条件.[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):27～30.
[30]付广,王有功,苏玉平等.用超压释放法确定烃源岩排烃期次-以古龙凹陷青山口组为例[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(5):538～541.
[31]杨光.松辽盆地南部油气成藏期研究-以黑帝庙地区为例[J].世界地质,2008,27(1):53～58.
[32]付广,杜影.从源盖时间匹配关系对比大庆长垣两侧扶、杨油层天然气远景[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(3):1～4.
[33]付广,刘博,吕延防.泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):21～26.
[34]付广,李晓伟.源外上生下储成藏主控因素及有利区预测-以松辽盆地尚家地区泉二段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):1～5.
[35]李彦芳,窦惠,王永兴等.松辽盆地英台扇三角洲复合体控制因素及沉积过程[J].大庆石油学院学报,1992,16(2):109～114.
[36]郭少斌,匡立春,杜旭东.综合利用测井曲线研究英台地区沉积微相-以青三段二砂组为例[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(4):36～41.
[37]王立武,李建忠,王兆云等.松辽盆地保乾三角洲前缘带演变及其勘探意义[J].沉积学报,2003,21(3):404～408.
[38]卫平生,王建功,潘树新等.河口坝、沿岸坝的形成及成藏机制以松辽盆地西、南部沉积体系为例[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(6):592～595.
[39]张大伟,贾庆素.大情字井地区青一段沉积微相分布特征[J].断块油气田,2006,13(6):1～3.
[40]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴等.松辽盆地南部青山口组湖相风暴沉积[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,34(1):12～16.
[41]魏兆胜,宋新民,唐振兴等.大情字井地区上白垩统青山口组沉积相与岩性油藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(1):28～33.
[42]王国栋,程日辉,王璞珺等.松辽盆地嫩江组白云岩形成机理-以松科1井南孔为例[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):48～54.
[43]单玄龙,胡金祥,任利军等.松辽盆地乾安地区青山口组三段沉积微相特征[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):65～71.
[44]王树恒,卢双舫,杨善民.松辽盆地北部西斜坡青二、三段四级层序C1水进域沉积微相特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(2):16～19.
[45]郭峰,陈世悦,王德海等.松辽盆地滨北地区白垩系泉头组-嫩江组沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(1):40～44.
[46]高有峰,王璞珺,程日辉等.松科1井南孔白垩系青山口组一段沉积序列精细描述:岩石地层、沉积相与旋回地层[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2009,16(2):314～323.
[47]张世奇,孙耀庭,刘金华等.气候变化对可容空间及层序发育的影响[J].海洋地质动态,2003,21(2):324～327.
[48]张立平,王东坡.松辽盆地白垩纪古气候特征及其变化机制[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(1):11～16.
[49]黄清华,郑玉龙,杨明杰等.松辽盆地白垩纪古气候研究[J].微体古生物学报,1999,16(1):95～103.
[50]李延平,林振宏,陈树民等.闭流坳陷湖盆的气候层序[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2007,27(6):91～96.
[51]马立祥,万静萍,钱奕中.松江盆地中白垩世两次湖侵沉积在层序地层学研究中的意义[J].大庆右油地质与开发,1992,11(1):10～13.
[52]王璞珺,杜小弟,王东坡.松辽盆地白垩纪湖侵沉积层序与湖海沟通事件的地球化学记录[J].岩相古地理,1995,15(4):14～20
[53]王璞珺,王东坡,杜小弟等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组黑色页岩的形成环境及海水侵入的底流模式[J].岩相古地理,1996,16(1):34～43.
[54]叶淑芬,魏魁生.松辽盆地白垩系的密集段及海水进侵的新证[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1996,21(3):267～271.
[55]黄福堂,迟元林,黄清华.松辽盆地中白垩世海侵事件质疑[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):104～109.
[56]王璞珺、Schneider Werner、Mattern Frank,等.陆相盆地中的海侵层序特征:中欧盆地三叠系与松辽盆地白垩系对比研究[J].矿物岩石,2002,22(2):47～53.
[57]王成善.白垩纪地球表层系统重大地质事件与温室气候变化研究-从重大地质事件探寻地球表层系统耦合[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(7):838～842.
[58]陈雪凝、陆永潮、吴河勇.白垩纪大洋沉积转变期间松辽盆地的沉积响应[J].天然气勘探与开方发,2007,30(3):32～36.
[59]黄永建,王成善,顾健.白垩纪大洋缺氧事件:研究进展与未来展望[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):21～30.
[60]辛仁臣,王英民.松辽盆地北部青山口-姚家组西部坡折带成因及演化[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2004,29(5):621～624.
[61]王建功,卫平生,郑浚茂,等.挠曲坡折带特征与油气勘探-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].石油学报,2005,26(2):26～29.
[62]王颖,王英民,赵志魁等.松辽盆地南部泉头组四段-姚家组西部坡折带的成因及演化[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):33～36.
[63]王颖,王英民,王晓洲,等.松辽盆地西部坡折带的成因演化及其对地层分布模式的控制作用[J].沉积学报,2005,23(3):498～506.
[64]杜江峰,刘招君,董清水等.松辽盆地南部西部斜坡区晚白垩世坳陷盆地坡折带研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):170～176.
[65]赵志魁.坳陷盆地缓坡坡折带与非构造圈闭形成研究-松辽盆地西部斜坡区隐蔽性油藏成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[66]黄薇,王建功,赵应成等.松辽盆地坳陷期坡折带特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):31～35.
[67]辛仁臣,张雪辉,张翼等.湖盆无曝露缓坡带层序界面特征及成因-以松辽盆地他拉哈地区上白垩统为例[J].沉积学报,2008,26(1):77～85.
[68]叶得泉,张莹.黑龙江省古龙及邻区高台子油层介形类分布特征及其生物相[J].沉积学报,1995,12(3):241～250.
[69]黄清华,陈春瑞,王平在等.松辽盆地晚白垩世生物演化与古湖泊缺氧事件[J].微体古生物学报,1998,15(4):417～425.
[70]万晓樵,李罡,陈丕基等.松辽盆地白垩纪青山口阶的同位素地层标志及其与海相Cenomanian阶的对比[J].地质学报,2005,79(2):150～156.
[71]崔莹,席党鹏,万晓樵.大庆油田徐22井青山口组-姚家组微体生物及其古气候响应[J].现代地质,2007,21(3):484～490.
[72]吴怀春,张世红,黄清华.中国东北松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组浮动天文年代标尺的建立[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2008,15(4):159～169.
[73]刘万洙,王璞珺,高有峰等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组核形石的发现及其环境意义[J].地质学报,2008,82(5):594～600.
[74]杨玉芳,钟建华,曾石岐等.松辽盆地早白垩世青山口组核形石的特征及其环境意义[J].地质学报,2009,83(4):558～569.
[75]王璞珺,杜小弟,王俊等.松辽盆地白垩纪年代地层研究及地层时代划分[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372～381.
[76]魏魁生,徐怀大,叶淑芬等.松辽盆地白垩系高分辨率层序地层格架[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(1):7～14.
[77]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析-以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):139～144.
[78]魏志平,唐振兴,江涛等.长岭凹陷层序地层分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):170～173.
[79]厉玉乐,张银国,陈建文.松辽盆地北部泰康-西超地区层序地层分析[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(6):694～700.
[80]朱筱敏,康安,王贵文.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):283～287.
[81]辛仁臣,蔡希源,王英民.松辽坳陷深水湖盆层序界面特征及低位域沉积模式,沉积学报,2004,22(3):387～392
[82]王建功,卫平生,杨建礼等.松辽盆地西南部青山口组三段底界不整合面与油气分布[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):566～573.
[83]王启飞,陈丕基.白垩纪年代地层学研究简述[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(2):114～123.
[84]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴等.松辽盆地南部坳陷期层序地层研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):1～7.
[85]李树青,李和,徐伟等.松辽盆地南部下白垩统层序构型及沉积特征[J].天然气工业,2007,27(4):36～39.
[86]林春明,冯志强,张顺等.松辽盆地北部白垩纪超层序特征[J].古地理学报,2007,9(6):619～634.
[87]赵波,张顺,林春明等.松辽盆地坳陷期湖盆层序地层研究[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(2):159～168.
[88]辛仁臣,张翼,张春卉等.松辽盆地中部含油组合高精度层序地层格架分析[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(4):389～396.
[89]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):50～60.
[90]梁春秀,王永春,康伟力等.现代勘探新技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的作用-松辽盆地大情字井超亿吨级油田的发现[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):50～57.
[91]顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):484～490.
[92]柏涛,徐志伟.层序地层学在隐蔽圈闭预测中的应用-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(1):73～78.
[93]邹才能,薛叔浩,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部白垩系泉头组-嫩江组沉积层序特征与地层-岩性油气藏形成条件[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):14～17.
[94]王建功,卫平生,郑浚茂等.挠曲坡折带特征与油气勘探-以松辽盆地南部为例[J].石油学报,2005,26(2):26～29.
[95]杨会东,王书平,马玉天等.高精度层序地层技术在松辽盆地南部隐蔽油藏勘探中的应用[J].石油学报,2005,26(3):40～43.
[96]邹才能,陶士振,谷志东.陆相坳陷盆地层序地层格架下岩性地层圈闭、油藏类型与分布规律-以松辽盆地白垩系泉头组-嫩江组为例[J].地质科学,2006,41(4):711～719.
[97]卫平生,潘树新,王建功等.湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究-论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):27～31.
[98]王建功,王天奇,卫平生等.松辽盆地青山口组三段底界不整合面的发现及石油地质学意义[J].地质学报,2009,83(1):78～88.
[99]李群,李小春,穆乃彬.松辽盆地南部大情字井地区层序地层及隐蔽油气藏预测[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(3):18～21.
[100]徐怀大,王世凤,陈开远.地震地层学解释基础[M]北京:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[101]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望[J].海相油气地质,2001,6(4):15～25.
[102] L. L.Sloss. Stratigraphic models in exploration: AAPG Bulletin[J]. 1962,v. 46, p. 1050~ 1057.
[103] L.L.Sloss.Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America.Geol.Soc.Am.Bull. [J]. 1962,74,93~113.
[104] Vail P R, Mitchum R M Jr,Todd R G, et al. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level.In:Payton C E, ed. Seismic stratigraphy-application of hydrocarbon exploration[J]. AAPG Memoir,1977,26:49-212.
[105] R.M.Mitchum,et al.Seismic stratigraphy and Global Changes of Sea Level,Part 2:the Depositional Sequence as a Basic Unit for Stratigraphic Analysis.In : Payton C.E.ed..Seismic Stratigraphy.AAPG,Memoir 26,1977,53~62.
[106] C.E.佩顿编.地震地层学(在油气勘探中的应用)[M].牛毓荃,徐怀大,陈俊生等译.北京:石油工业出版社,1980.
[107]蔡希源,李思田,樊太亮等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学-隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.1-2.
[108]聂逢君.层序地层学的起源及其发展[J].铀矿地质,2001,17(6):193~202.
[109]侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层学的研究进展[J].矿物岩石,2001,21(3):128~134.
[110]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):8~13.
[111] P.R.Vail,J.B.Sangree著.应用层序地层学[M].张宏逵等译.东营:石油大学出版社,1991.17-27.
[112]郝黎明,邵龙义.基于层序地层格架的有机相研究进展[J].地质科技情报,2000,19(4):60~64.
[113]王正文,赵追,李峰等.陆相盆地层序地层学研究现状及发展趋势[J].河南石油,2002,16(3):8~11.
[114]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1.
[115] P.R.Vail,etal. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level [J]. AAPG, 1977, Memoir 26.
[116] P.R.Vail,J.b.Sangree. Annual Convention short course: Sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic well and outcrop data [C]. March19,1988 Houston,Texas.
[117]郭建华,朱美衡,刘辰生等.陆相断陷盆地湖平面变化曲线与层序地层学框架模式讨论[J].矿物岩石,2005,25(2):87~92.
[118] J.C.Van Wagoner,etal.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. In: C. W. Bally(ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy.AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):11~14.
[119] P.R.Vail.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy.Part1 : Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure, In:C. W. Bally (ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy. AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):1-10.
[120] C. W. Wilgus,et al.(eds.).Sea Level Changes. An Integrated Approach SEPM Special Publication 42,1988.
[121]徐强,姜烨,董伟良,等.中国层序地层研究现状和发展方向, [J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):155~167.
[122]薛良清.成因层序地层学的回顾与展望[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):484~488.
[123]郭东晓,罗啸泉.层序地层学研究在国内的进展[J].四川地质学报,1997,17(2):92～95.
[124]池秋鄂,龚福华编著.层序地层学基础与应用[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[125] H.W.Posamentier and R.D.Erskine. () Seismic expression and recognition criteria of ancient submarine fans. In::Seismic Facies and Sedimentary Processes of Modern and Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems (ed.by P.Weimer and M.H.Link). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991,pp.197～222.
[126]魏魁生,徐怀大.二连盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序地层学特征[J].地球科学,1994,19(2):181～193.
[127] G.Dam,F.Surlyk.. Cyclic sedimentation in a large wave and storm-dominated anoxic lake; Kap Stewart Formation (Rhaethian-Sinemurian), Jameson Land, East Greenland. In: Posamentier H.W, Summerhayes C.P. Haq B.U, Allen G.P (eds) Sequence stratigraphy and facies associations. Int Assoc Sediment Spec Pual(Blackwell).1993,18: 419～448.
[128]徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题[J].石油与天然气地质.1997,18(2):83～89.
[129]夏文臣.华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1994,19(1):19～28.
[130] J.C.Van Wagoner , G.T.Bertram(Eds.).Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits,vol. 64. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir.1995,487pp.
[131]解习农.松辽盆地梨树凹陷深部断裂沉积体系及层序地层特征[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):144～150.
[132]胡受权.泌阳断陷陆相层序外部构型研究.现代地质[J].1998,12(4):567～574.
[133]桑树勋,秦勇,范炳恒等.层序地层学在陆相盆地煤层气资源评价中的应用研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(2):113～118.
[134]林承焰,张宪国,董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用.石油学报[J].2007,28(2):69～72.
[135]陆永潮,杜学斌,陈平,等.油气精细勘探的主要方法体系-地震沉积学研究.石油试验地质[J].2008,30(1):1～5.
[136]吴因业,顾家裕,施和生,等.从层序地层学到地震沉积学-全国第5届油气层序地层学大会综述.石油试验地质[J].2008,30(3):217～220.
[137] T.A.Cross.High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodations[A].In : Proceedings of Northwestern European Sequence Stratigrapgy Congress[C].1994.105~123.
[138] J.C.Van Wagoner etal. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops:concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series,7,1990.1-155.
[139]邓宏文.美国层序研究中的新学派-高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89~97.
[140] T.A.Cross. Stratigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(4):322～332.
[141]薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清等.湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[142]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96～102.
[143]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):9095.
[144]郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].沉积学报,1998,16( 2):42～49.
[145]杜春艳,郑荣才.陕北长6油层组短期基准面旋回与储层非均质性的关系[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):17～22.
[146]郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):348～356.
[147]吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):375～381.
[148]柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):50～56.
[149]尹太举.高分辩率层序地层学及其在濮城油田开发中的应用[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2002.8～20.
[150]王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文.东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段高分辨率层序地层与岩性圈闭特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版)2004,28(4):7～11.
[151]易定红,田光荣.杏树岗-太平屯地区扶杨油层层序地层研究[J].新疆石油地址,2004,25(6):607～609.
[152]邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏,Timothy A. Cross.河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):373～379.
[153]林畅松,刘景彦,刘丽军等.高精度层序地层分析:建立沉积相和储层规模的等时地层格架[J].现代地质,2002,16(3):276～281.
[154]王中良.大庆油田北三西葡一油组高精度层序地层学研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2006.
[155]张守昌,李晨,张泽慧等.地震技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(3):13～15.
[156] H. W.Posamentier and P. R. Vail,Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II-sequence and systems tract models,in C. K.Wilgus,B. S. Hastings,C. G. St.C. Kendall,H. W. Posamentier, C. A. Ross,and J. C. Van Wagoner,eds.,Sea level changes:an integrated approach:SEPM Special Publication 42,1988:p.125–154.
[157] Keith W. Shanley and Peter J. McCabe. Perspectives on the Sequence Stratigraphy ofContinental Strata AAPG Bulletin,V. 78,No. 4 (April 1994),P. 544–568.
[158] J.C.Van Wagoner,G.T.Bertram,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland deposits:outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America [C].AAPG Memoir,1995,64:137～223.
[159]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析-以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2),139~144.
[160]蔡雄飞,李长安,占车生.陆相盆地地层研究进展[J].地学前缘,1999,6(4):407.
[161]刘招君,郭巍,董清水等.湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式-以松辽盆地西部斜坡区为例[J].长春地质学院学报,1997,27(增刊Ⅱ) :54～60.
[162]刘招君,董清水,郭巍,等.断陷湖盆层序地层特征及模式-以松辽盆地梨树断陷为例[J].长春科技大学学报,1998,28(1):54～58.
[163]胡受权,颜其彬.泌阳断陷双河-赵凹地区陆相层序地层学模式[J].地质科学,1998,33(4):435～446.
[164]解习农,陆永潮,任建业,等.松辽盆地层序地层格架和中浅层沉积体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[165]赵志魁.坳陷盆地缓坡坡折带与非构造圈闭形成研究-松辽盆地西部斜坡区隐蔽性油藏成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007.
[166]王书宝,孙钰,钟建华,等.松辽盆地晚白垩世古气候变化对层序发育的影响[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(4):29～32.
[167]纪友亮,张世奇,张宏等.层序地层原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.1-116.
[168]刘立,王东坡.湖相油页岩的沉积环境及其层序地层学意义[J].石油实验地质,1996,18(3):311～316.
[169]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学理论及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-130.
[170]朱筱敏,康安,谢庆宾.内蒙古钱家店凹陷侏罗系层序地层与岩性圈闭[J]石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):48-52.
[171]薛良清.湖相盆地中的层序、体系域与隐蔽油气藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):115～120.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |