我国居民消费倾向变化及原因研究
|
摘要
转型期间,我国经济稳步而持续的发展已成为共识。其中消费在经济发展中具有重要地位,直接关系到了我国宏观经济运行态势,同时经济发展成果的首要表现之一就是居民消费水平的提高和消费结构的升级。转型时期居民消费表现出明显的消费需求升级特征,消费结构转变快速。同时备受关注的问题是,随着经济的增长、居民收入的提高,我国居民消费率持续走低,居民消费倾向不足、消费不振等问题日益凸显,如何振兴和发展消费是我国经济持续发展过程中需要着力解决的问题。深入考察我国居民消费行为、采取有效政策振兴消费成为本文的研究目的和主题。
经典消费理论对消费倾向的决定或影响因素进行了一般性的论述,其研究路径主要从收入因素和需求因素两个方面展开和深化。现有文献从不同的视点和角度分别对我国居民消费倾向进行研究,其研究方法及研究结论存在较大的差异性。本文在已有理论和研究的基础上,充分考虑制度因素、收入因素和需求因素几个方面,重在结合我国居民的消费需求变化实际来研究其消费倾向。在经济和收入的增长背景下,居民的消费领域不断扩展,消费构成多元化,并且各消费项目存在量的消长差异和质的区别,居民交通通信、教育、医疗和住房等新兴消费项目逐渐构成消费行为的主要方面。总消费支出是各项消费支出的综合,居民消费需求升级的程度决定着消费的规模,因此有必要打开消费“黑箱”,在消费内容分解的基础上来研究消费行为,从消费结构变化的内部发展来考察消费行为变化。已有文献的消费研究虽多,但对消费需求升级因素重视不够,几乎没有直接从消费需求变化角度来对我国居民当前的消费问题进行研究和分析。从消费的内部结构变化作为切入点来研究居民消费行为以及消费倾向变化既是消费需求发展变化现实的要求,也是消费问题研究的一种本质上的回归。因此,以消费理论发展与演进为基础,结合我国经济转型的现实,在对消费内部进行内容分解的基础上,本文把制度和收入等因素渗透在居民消费需求变化中,把居民消费需求变化与消费倾向变化联系起来,探讨二者之间的内在关系,在此基础之上回归到制度和政策等因素为消费倾向提高提供具体建议,使得对策的制定和实践更加有的放矢。
论文基于转型时期居民消费需求升级视角,建立了收入因素、消费需求升级和消费倾向之间的动态关系。经济增长与转型过程中,居民消费选择机制是收入因素、消费需求升级和消费倾向三个方面相互作用的结果,居民消费需求升级与消费倾向之间存在动态影响关系。具体而言,居民收入水平的增长提供基础支持,居民消费需求升级选择和实现与从收入到消费倾向的决策形成动态关系,同时居民消费倾向的高低决定了消费需求升级的空间和程度,结果消费倾向与消费需求升级形成动态均衡。经济转型过程中的制度因素以及经济增长中的收入因素既构成了居民消费的基本约束,也渗透到居民具体消费项目的消费决策中,从而共同决定了居民消费倾向水平。消费结构中各消费项目之间既有替代性又有互补性。当居民消费的结构升级需求更强时,如果对新兴消费项目的消费意愿不能即时实现转化为实际需求,这部分消费潜力就不容易被替代转移到其他消费项目。医疗改革、教育改革以及住房改革等政策和体制变革直接影响到对应的消费项目；收入水平的提高使得房车等支出量级较高的大型消费项目成为消费重点。当新兴消费项目的消费需求不能快速实现时,消费支出就会受到抑制,结果是储蓄水平提高和消费倾向下降。我国的市场化推进、政策制度不完善以及二者的不匹配会引发居民消费需求升级难题：消费倾向可能被消费自身的升级需求所抑制,消费需求升级不足外化为消费倾向下降。另外,转型中制度和收入不确定性以及新兴消费项目存在的支出不确定性也是影响居民消费倾向的重要因素。
在定量分析方面,关于居民消费结构升级因素对消费倾向演变的影响,时间序列分析表明消费结构变动度与消费倾向之间具有长期均衡的协整关系；ELES的模型从理论上说明了消费结构变化因素对消费倾向的影响,实证分析表明消费结构升级因素对消费支出变动有越来越强的作用。对消费倾向变化的消费结构因素定量分析表明了消费结构升级与消费倾向变化之间的密切联系,以及结构中各项消费对消费倾向的区别影响。进一步本文基于消费需求升级、消费倾向与收入之间复杂关系以及变量之间作用关系不确定的分析,采用向量自回归模型(VAR)和面板数据(Panel Data)计量模型来进行实证研究。向量自回归模型(VAR)实证考察了消费结构变化对消费倾向的动态影响。分析表明各大消费项目对消费倾向有不同方向和程度的影响作用。具体来讲,对于城镇居民,食物、衣着和家庭设备用品及服务三个传统消费项目比重变化对消费倾向有反向作用。医疗保健和个人用品、交通通信、娱乐教育和居住四个热点型消费项目对消费倾向的影响出现分化。教育、交通通信和居住类消费比重的变化对消费倾向有明显正向影响；而医疗消费比重变化对消费倾向有非常突出的、持续的负向影响,是消费不振的重要原因,反映了医疗改革带来的医疗负担对居民消费造成的抑制作用。从影响程度大小比较来看,热点型消费比传统型消费对消费倾向的影响程度更大,这也体现了消费需求升级因素在消费行为中的影响力。农村的实证分析结果体现出与城镇居民的差异,主要表现在,相对于城镇居民来讲,农村居民的家庭设备用品及服务消费比重对于消费倾向的正向影响较大,说明家庭设备用品及服务消费仍是农村居民消费需求升级的重点项目,应成为促进农村消费政策的重点关注对象：农村居民医疗保健方面的消费比重对消费倾向构成较大的正向影响,说明农村居民的医疗支出构成了农村居民消费的切实负担。相比较而言,城镇居民的消费需求升级与消费倾向的关系受政策和体制变化(如医疗、教育等消费)影响较大；建立在较低的收入水平制约之上,农村居民的消费需求升级与消费倾向关系受到实物性消费(如家用电器、住房支出等)的影响强烈,较低的收入水平使得农村居民的消费需求升级处于较低阶段。进一步的面板数据(PanelData)计量模型实证分析考察了各方面因素与消费倾向的作用关系。分析结论有助于建立推动居民消费、提高居民消费倾向的政策与消费结构升级中具体消费项目之间的关系,实现消费需求升级和消费倾向提高的一致性。消费需求变化对消费倾向影响的分析结论对倡导热点型消费、高度重视医疗行业的改革和发展、减小人们医疗支出方面的不确定性和经济压力、尽快建立积极有效的社会保障制度和推动农村消费等诸方面的振兴消费政策有重要启示。
In transition period, the steady and sustainable development of China economy has become a consensus. Consumption, directly relating to China macroeconomic situation, has an important position in economic development. At the same time, the first performance of economic development is to raise consumption level and speed up consumption structure upgrading. In transition period, upgrading features of consumption is clear, and consumption structure is fast-changing. But one major concern is, with economic and income growth, that China's consumption rate has been falling, and the issues of low propensity to Consume or consumption sluggish has been increasingly prominent. How to expand consumption demand and stimulate economic growth is currently a major problem. Deep survey of consumer behavior of Chinese residents and adopting effective policies to revitalize consumption become the subject of our study.
Classical consumption theories present a general exposition of influencing factors for propensity to consume, expanding and deepening from both income and demand factors. The existing literatures study Chinese resident's propensity to consume from different perspectives and angles, and there are big differences among their research methodology and conclusions. Based on existing theory and research, this paper studies Chinese resident's propensity to consume, fully taking into account institutional factors, income factors and demand factors, and focusing on the role of consumer demand upgrading of Chinese resident in propensity to consume. Following the economic and income growth, people's consumption field gets ever-expanding, and consumption structure has a move toward diversification, and there are the quantity and nature differences among various consumption items. Emerging consumer items, such as transportation and communication, education, health care and housing, gradually constitute the main aspects of consumer behavior. Total consumption expenditure is the result of al! items expenditure and the level of consumption structure upgrading determines the size of consumption. So it is necessary to open the "black box" of consumption, study consumer behavior based on the decomposition of consumer content and examine behavior change from internal development of consumption structure changing. Although the literatures on consumer behavior have been more, it is rare to study current issue of Chinese resident consumption from the point of consumption upgrading. It is not only the demands of reality in consumer demand changing, but also the nature return of research on consumption issues to study consumer behavior and propensity to consume from the pointcut of internal development of consumption structure changing. Therefore, based on advance and evolution of consumer theory and combined with the reality of China economic transition, from the perspective of consumption upgrading, this paper infiltrates institution, income and other factors into consumer demand changing, relates propensity to consume to consumption upgrading, investigate their intrinsic relationship and then return to institution and policy to provide specific and targeted recommendations for the growth of propensity to consume.
Based on the perspective of consumption structure upgrading in the transition period, this paper establishes dynamic relationship of income, consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. During the Economic growth and transition, consumer choice mechanism is the interaction of consumption structure upgrading, propensity to consume and income. There is dynamic effect between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. In particular, the growth in income level is the basic support, the choice and achievement of resident consumption upgrading forms a dynamic relationship with the decision from income to propensity to consume, while the level of propensity to consume determines the space and extent of consumption upgrading, and in the end dynamic equilibrium between propensity to consume and consumption upgrading is obtained. Institutional factors in the economic transition period and income factors in economic growth constitute the basic constraints of resident consumption, and penetrate to the consumer decision-making for specific consumer items, which jointly determine the level of propensity to consume. There are both alternative relationship and complementary relationship among various consumer items. When the consumption structure upgrading is more important, if consumption growth in emerging consumer items can not immediately be transferred to actual demand, this potential spending is not easily transferred to other consumer items. Health care reform, education reform and housing reform directly affect the corresponding consumer items; Income growth makes house and car become the main consumer items. As consumer demand of emerging consumer items can not be quickly realized, the decline of alternative relationship among various consumer items inhibits total consumption expenditure, allowing savings increase and expenditure decline. China's market-oriented forward, the imperfect of policies and systems, and the mismatch between them lead to the difficult of consumption upgrading, and inadequate of consumption upgrading is reflected in the decline of propensity to consume, and then harms the interaction between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. In addition, the uncertainty of institution, income and expenditure of emerging consumer items are also important factors affecting propensity to consume.
In the quantitative analysis, with regard to the effect from consumption upgrading on propensity to consume, time series analysis shows that the degree of change in consumption structure and propensity to consume have cointegration relationship of long-term equilibrium; ELES model theoretically describes the effect of consumption structure changing on propensity to consume, and empirical analysis shows that consumption structure factor plays more and more important role in propensity to consume changing. Quantitative analysis shows that there is close link between consumption structure upgrading and propensity to consume, and the different impact from different consumption item. Furthermore, based the complex relationship among consumption upgrading, propensity to consume and income, and the uncertainty of their relationship, this paper uses vector autoregression (VAR) and panel data model to carry out empirical research. Much relevant research has been the lack of the dynamic system relation among consumption upgrading, propensity to consume and income, so has not do the research of consumer behavior from the perspective of consumption upgrading. Vector autoregression (VAR) empirically studies the dynamic effects of consumption structure changing on propensity to consume. Empirical analysis shows the difference of directions and degrees of various major consumption items'effect on propensity to consume. Specifically, for urban residents, changes in the proportion of three traditional consumption items, food, clothing and household appliances and services, have reverse effect on propensity to consume. Four hot consumption items, medical care and personal products, transportation and telecommunications, entertainment and education and housing produce different impact on average propensity to consume. The proportion change of education, transportation and communication and housing produce significant positive influence on propensity to consume; while the proportion change in health care spending tends to have very prominent and sustained negative effect, and is an important reason for consumption sluggish, reflecting burden caused by the health care reform. As for the impact degree, emerging consumption items have greater impact than the traditional consumption items on propensity to consume, which also reflects consumption upgrading influence on consumer behavior. Empirical analysis of rural residents reflects the differences from urban residents:compared with urban residents, the proportion of consumption of household appliances and services in rural residents has a greater positive impact on propensity to consume, indicating that consumption of household appliances and services is still a key project for consumption upgrading in rural areas, and it should be the focus of rural consumption policy; Proportion change of rural residents'health care spending tends to constitute the positive impact on propensity to consume, indicating the practical burden from health care spending. In comparison, the relation between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume in urban residents is influenced more by the policy and institutional changes (such as health, education and other consumption); Based on the lower level of income, the relation between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume in rural residents is subject to physical consumption(such as household appliances, housing, etc.) more, and lower income level makes the consumption upgrading of rural residents at a lower stage. Further, panel data analysis examines long-term relationship between various factors and propensity to consume. Conclusions contribute to the establishment of relation between consumption promoting policy and consumption structure upgrading to achieve their consistency. Conclusions on the effect from the proportion change of various consumption items on propensity to consume provide important inspiration as fallowing aspects:to promote emerging consumption items, attaching great importance to the reform and development of medical industry, to reduce residents pressures and uncertainty from health care spending, as soon as possible to establish positive and effective social protection system and to promote rural consumption for the revitalization of consumption and so on.
经典消费理论对消费倾向的决定或影响因素进行了一般性的论述,其研究路径主要从收入因素和需求因素两个方面展开和深化。现有文献从不同的视点和角度分别对我国居民消费倾向进行研究,其研究方法及研究结论存在较大的差异性。本文在已有理论和研究的基础上,充分考虑制度因素、收入因素和需求因素几个方面,重在结合我国居民的消费需求变化实际来研究其消费倾向。在经济和收入的增长背景下,居民的消费领域不断扩展,消费构成多元化,并且各消费项目存在量的消长差异和质的区别,居民交通通信、教育、医疗和住房等新兴消费项目逐渐构成消费行为的主要方面。总消费支出是各项消费支出的综合,居民消费需求升级的程度决定着消费的规模,因此有必要打开消费“黑箱”,在消费内容分解的基础上来研究消费行为,从消费结构变化的内部发展来考察消费行为变化。已有文献的消费研究虽多,但对消费需求升级因素重视不够,几乎没有直接从消费需求变化角度来对我国居民当前的消费问题进行研究和分析。从消费的内部结构变化作为切入点来研究居民消费行为以及消费倾向变化既是消费需求发展变化现实的要求,也是消费问题研究的一种本质上的回归。因此,以消费理论发展与演进为基础,结合我国经济转型的现实,在对消费内部进行内容分解的基础上,本文把制度和收入等因素渗透在居民消费需求变化中,把居民消费需求变化与消费倾向变化联系起来,探讨二者之间的内在关系,在此基础之上回归到制度和政策等因素为消费倾向提高提供具体建议,使得对策的制定和实践更加有的放矢。
论文基于转型时期居民消费需求升级视角,建立了收入因素、消费需求升级和消费倾向之间的动态关系。经济增长与转型过程中,居民消费选择机制是收入因素、消费需求升级和消费倾向三个方面相互作用的结果,居民消费需求升级与消费倾向之间存在动态影响关系。具体而言,居民收入水平的增长提供基础支持,居民消费需求升级选择和实现与从收入到消费倾向的决策形成动态关系,同时居民消费倾向的高低决定了消费需求升级的空间和程度,结果消费倾向与消费需求升级形成动态均衡。经济转型过程中的制度因素以及经济增长中的收入因素既构成了居民消费的基本约束,也渗透到居民具体消费项目的消费决策中,从而共同决定了居民消费倾向水平。消费结构中各消费项目之间既有替代性又有互补性。当居民消费的结构升级需求更强时,如果对新兴消费项目的消费意愿不能即时实现转化为实际需求,这部分消费潜力就不容易被替代转移到其他消费项目。医疗改革、教育改革以及住房改革等政策和体制变革直接影响到对应的消费项目；收入水平的提高使得房车等支出量级较高的大型消费项目成为消费重点。当新兴消费项目的消费需求不能快速实现时,消费支出就会受到抑制,结果是储蓄水平提高和消费倾向下降。我国的市场化推进、政策制度不完善以及二者的不匹配会引发居民消费需求升级难题：消费倾向可能被消费自身的升级需求所抑制,消费需求升级不足外化为消费倾向下降。另外,转型中制度和收入不确定性以及新兴消费项目存在的支出不确定性也是影响居民消费倾向的重要因素。
在定量分析方面,关于居民消费结构升级因素对消费倾向演变的影响,时间序列分析表明消费结构变动度与消费倾向之间具有长期均衡的协整关系；ELES的模型从理论上说明了消费结构变化因素对消费倾向的影响,实证分析表明消费结构升级因素对消费支出变动有越来越强的作用。对消费倾向变化的消费结构因素定量分析表明了消费结构升级与消费倾向变化之间的密切联系,以及结构中各项消费对消费倾向的区别影响。进一步本文基于消费需求升级、消费倾向与收入之间复杂关系以及变量之间作用关系不确定的分析,采用向量自回归模型(VAR)和面板数据(Panel Data)计量模型来进行实证研究。向量自回归模型(VAR)实证考察了消费结构变化对消费倾向的动态影响。分析表明各大消费项目对消费倾向有不同方向和程度的影响作用。具体来讲,对于城镇居民,食物、衣着和家庭设备用品及服务三个传统消费项目比重变化对消费倾向有反向作用。医疗保健和个人用品、交通通信、娱乐教育和居住四个热点型消费项目对消费倾向的影响出现分化。教育、交通通信和居住类消费比重的变化对消费倾向有明显正向影响；而医疗消费比重变化对消费倾向有非常突出的、持续的负向影响,是消费不振的重要原因,反映了医疗改革带来的医疗负担对居民消费造成的抑制作用。从影响程度大小比较来看,热点型消费比传统型消费对消费倾向的影响程度更大,这也体现了消费需求升级因素在消费行为中的影响力。农村的实证分析结果体现出与城镇居民的差异,主要表现在,相对于城镇居民来讲,农村居民的家庭设备用品及服务消费比重对于消费倾向的正向影响较大,说明家庭设备用品及服务消费仍是农村居民消费需求升级的重点项目,应成为促进农村消费政策的重点关注对象：农村居民医疗保健方面的消费比重对消费倾向构成较大的正向影响,说明农村居民的医疗支出构成了农村居民消费的切实负担。相比较而言,城镇居民的消费需求升级与消费倾向的关系受政策和体制变化(如医疗、教育等消费)影响较大；建立在较低的收入水平制约之上,农村居民的消费需求升级与消费倾向关系受到实物性消费(如家用电器、住房支出等)的影响强烈,较低的收入水平使得农村居民的消费需求升级处于较低阶段。进一步的面板数据(PanelData)计量模型实证分析考察了各方面因素与消费倾向的作用关系。分析结论有助于建立推动居民消费、提高居民消费倾向的政策与消费结构升级中具体消费项目之间的关系,实现消费需求升级和消费倾向提高的一致性。消费需求变化对消费倾向影响的分析结论对倡导热点型消费、高度重视医疗行业的改革和发展、减小人们医疗支出方面的不确定性和经济压力、尽快建立积极有效的社会保障制度和推动农村消费等诸方面的振兴消费政策有重要启示。
In transition period, the steady and sustainable development of China economy has become a consensus. Consumption, directly relating to China macroeconomic situation, has an important position in economic development. At the same time, the first performance of economic development is to raise consumption level and speed up consumption structure upgrading. In transition period, upgrading features of consumption is clear, and consumption structure is fast-changing. But one major concern is, with economic and income growth, that China's consumption rate has been falling, and the issues of low propensity to Consume or consumption sluggish has been increasingly prominent. How to expand consumption demand and stimulate economic growth is currently a major problem. Deep survey of consumer behavior of Chinese residents and adopting effective policies to revitalize consumption become the subject of our study.
Classical consumption theories present a general exposition of influencing factors for propensity to consume, expanding and deepening from both income and demand factors. The existing literatures study Chinese resident's propensity to consume from different perspectives and angles, and there are big differences among their research methodology and conclusions. Based on existing theory and research, this paper studies Chinese resident's propensity to consume, fully taking into account institutional factors, income factors and demand factors, and focusing on the role of consumer demand upgrading of Chinese resident in propensity to consume. Following the economic and income growth, people's consumption field gets ever-expanding, and consumption structure has a move toward diversification, and there are the quantity and nature differences among various consumption items. Emerging consumer items, such as transportation and communication, education, health care and housing, gradually constitute the main aspects of consumer behavior. Total consumption expenditure is the result of al! items expenditure and the level of consumption structure upgrading determines the size of consumption. So it is necessary to open the "black box" of consumption, study consumer behavior based on the decomposition of consumer content and examine behavior change from internal development of consumption structure changing. Although the literatures on consumer behavior have been more, it is rare to study current issue of Chinese resident consumption from the point of consumption upgrading. It is not only the demands of reality in consumer demand changing, but also the nature return of research on consumption issues to study consumer behavior and propensity to consume from the pointcut of internal development of consumption structure changing. Therefore, based on advance and evolution of consumer theory and combined with the reality of China economic transition, from the perspective of consumption upgrading, this paper infiltrates institution, income and other factors into consumer demand changing, relates propensity to consume to consumption upgrading, investigate their intrinsic relationship and then return to institution and policy to provide specific and targeted recommendations for the growth of propensity to consume.
Based on the perspective of consumption structure upgrading in the transition period, this paper establishes dynamic relationship of income, consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. During the Economic growth and transition, consumer choice mechanism is the interaction of consumption structure upgrading, propensity to consume and income. There is dynamic effect between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. In particular, the growth in income level is the basic support, the choice and achievement of resident consumption upgrading forms a dynamic relationship with the decision from income to propensity to consume, while the level of propensity to consume determines the space and extent of consumption upgrading, and in the end dynamic equilibrium between propensity to consume and consumption upgrading is obtained. Institutional factors in the economic transition period and income factors in economic growth constitute the basic constraints of resident consumption, and penetrate to the consumer decision-making for specific consumer items, which jointly determine the level of propensity to consume. There are both alternative relationship and complementary relationship among various consumer items. When the consumption structure upgrading is more important, if consumption growth in emerging consumer items can not immediately be transferred to actual demand, this potential spending is not easily transferred to other consumer items. Health care reform, education reform and housing reform directly affect the corresponding consumer items; Income growth makes house and car become the main consumer items. As consumer demand of emerging consumer items can not be quickly realized, the decline of alternative relationship among various consumer items inhibits total consumption expenditure, allowing savings increase and expenditure decline. China's market-oriented forward, the imperfect of policies and systems, and the mismatch between them lead to the difficult of consumption upgrading, and inadequate of consumption upgrading is reflected in the decline of propensity to consume, and then harms the interaction between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume. In addition, the uncertainty of institution, income and expenditure of emerging consumer items are also important factors affecting propensity to consume.
In the quantitative analysis, with regard to the effect from consumption upgrading on propensity to consume, time series analysis shows that the degree of change in consumption structure and propensity to consume have cointegration relationship of long-term equilibrium; ELES model theoretically describes the effect of consumption structure changing on propensity to consume, and empirical analysis shows that consumption structure factor plays more and more important role in propensity to consume changing. Quantitative analysis shows that there is close link between consumption structure upgrading and propensity to consume, and the different impact from different consumption item. Furthermore, based the complex relationship among consumption upgrading, propensity to consume and income, and the uncertainty of their relationship, this paper uses vector autoregression (VAR) and panel data model to carry out empirical research. Much relevant research has been the lack of the dynamic system relation among consumption upgrading, propensity to consume and income, so has not do the research of consumer behavior from the perspective of consumption upgrading. Vector autoregression (VAR) empirically studies the dynamic effects of consumption structure changing on propensity to consume. Empirical analysis shows the difference of directions and degrees of various major consumption items'effect on propensity to consume. Specifically, for urban residents, changes in the proportion of three traditional consumption items, food, clothing and household appliances and services, have reverse effect on propensity to consume. Four hot consumption items, medical care and personal products, transportation and telecommunications, entertainment and education and housing produce different impact on average propensity to consume. The proportion change of education, transportation and communication and housing produce significant positive influence on propensity to consume; while the proportion change in health care spending tends to have very prominent and sustained negative effect, and is an important reason for consumption sluggish, reflecting burden caused by the health care reform. As for the impact degree, emerging consumption items have greater impact than the traditional consumption items on propensity to consume, which also reflects consumption upgrading influence on consumer behavior. Empirical analysis of rural residents reflects the differences from urban residents:compared with urban residents, the proportion of consumption of household appliances and services in rural residents has a greater positive impact on propensity to consume, indicating that consumption of household appliances and services is still a key project for consumption upgrading in rural areas, and it should be the focus of rural consumption policy; Proportion change of rural residents'health care spending tends to constitute the positive impact on propensity to consume, indicating the practical burden from health care spending. In comparison, the relation between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume in urban residents is influenced more by the policy and institutional changes (such as health, education and other consumption); Based on the lower level of income, the relation between consumption upgrading and propensity to consume in rural residents is subject to physical consumption(such as household appliances, housing, etc.) more, and lower income level makes the consumption upgrading of rural residents at a lower stage. Further, panel data analysis examines long-term relationship between various factors and propensity to consume. Conclusions contribute to the establishment of relation between consumption promoting policy and consumption structure upgrading to achieve their consistency. Conclusions on the effect from the proportion change of various consumption items on propensity to consume provide important inspiration as fallowing aspects:to promote emerging consumption items, attaching great importance to the reform and development of medical industry, to reduce residents pressures and uncertainty from health care spending, as soon as possible to establish positive and effective social protection system and to promote rural consumption for the revitalization of consumption and so on.
引文
[1]Albert Jaeger, Does Consumption Take a Random Walk? Some Evidence from Macroeconomic Forecasting Data[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.74, No.4 (Nov.,1992), pp.607-614.
[2]Aart Kraay, Household Saving in China[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.14, No.3 (Sep.,2000), pp.545-570.
[3]Alessandra Guariglia and Byung-Yeon Kim, Earnings Uncertainty, Precautionary Saving and Moonlighting in Russia[J]. Journal of Population Economics, Vol.17, No.2 (Jun.,2004), pp.289-310.
[4]Ashok K. Lahiri, Dynamics of Asian Savings:The Role of Growth and Age Structure[J]. Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, Vol.36, No.1 (Mar., 1989), pp.228-261.
[5]BRANCH, E. R., The Consumer Expenditure Survey:A Comparative Analysis[J]. Monthly Labor Review,1994,117:47-55.
[6]Caballero, Ricardo J., Earning Uncertainty and Aggregate Wealth Accumulation[J]. American Economic Review,1991,81.
[7]Caballero, R. J., Durable Goods:An Explanation for Their Slow Adjustment[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1993, Vol.101, No.2.
[8]Carroll, C., Overland, J., and Weil, D., Saving and Growth with Habit formation[J]. American Economic Review,2000,90 (3):341-350.
[9]Carroll, Christopher D. and Miles S. Kimball, On the Concavity of the Consumption Function[J]. Econometrica,1996, Vol.64, No.4:985-990.
[10]Caballero Richardo J., An Explanation for Their Slow Adjustment[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1993. Vol.101, No.2:351-383.
[11]Caballero Richardo J., Expenditure on Durable Goods:A Case for Slow Adjustment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1990, Vol.105, No.3:728-742.
[12]Chen C. and Tiao G.C., Random Level-Shift Time Series Models, ARIMA Approximations and Level-Shift Detection[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,1990,8:83-92.
[13]Campell, J. Y. and N. G. Mankiw, The Response of Consumption to Income, a Cross-section Investigation[J]. European Economic Review,1991, Vol.35, No. 4:723-756.
[14]Cochrane, John H., A Simple Test of Consumption Insurance[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(5):957-976.
[15]Carroll, C. D., The Buffer Stock Theory of Saving:Some Macroeconomic Evidence[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1992,2:61-135.
[16]Deaton Angus, Household Saving in LDCs:Credit Markets, Insurance and Welfare[J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,1992, Vol.94, No.2:255-273.
[17]Dydan, Karen E., Jonathan Skinner and Stephen P. Zeldes, Do the Rich Save More? [J]. Journal of Political Economy,2004, Vol.112, No.2:340-443.
[18]Eberly, J. C, Adjustment of Consumers'Durables Stocks:Evidence from Automobile Purchases[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1994, Vol.102, No.3: 402-435.
[19]Epstein, L. G., and Z in, S. E., Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns:A Theoretical Framework[J]. Econometrica,1989,57:937-969.
[20]Flavin, M. A., Excess Sensitibity of Consumption to Current Income: Liquidity Constraints or Myopia[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,1985, Vol. 18:117-123.
[21]Faruk Gul and Wolfgang Pesendorfer, Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption[J]. Econometrica, Vol.72, No.1 (Jan.,2004):119-158.
[22]Fred Mannering and Clifford Winston. A Dynamic Empirical Analysis of Household Vehicle Ownership and Utilization [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.16, No.2 (Summer,1985):215-236.
[23]Friedman, M. A Theory of the Consumption Function[M]. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,1957.
[24]Grossman, S. J. and G. Laroque, Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods[J]. Econometrica,1990, Vol.58, No.1:25-51.
[25]GOURINCHAS, P. O., and J. A. PARKER, The Empirical Importance of Precautionary Saving[J]. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings),2001,91:406-412.
[26]Hall R., Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1978, (5): 971-987.
[27]Holland Hunter, Transport in Soviet and Chinese Development[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1965, Vol.14, No.1.
[28]Hassler, J., Variations in Risk and Fluctuations in Demand-A Theoretical Model[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1996,20 (6-7): 1115-1143.
[29]Hassler Uwe, Reasonable Spurious Regressions [J]. Econometric Theory, 1996, Vol.12, No.4:742-744.
[30]Hackl, P., Economic Structural Change[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag,2005: 43-70.
[31]Hayne E. Leland, Saving and Uncertainty:The Precautionary Demand for Saving[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.82, No.3 (Aug.,1968): 465-473.
[32]Jonathan A. Parker and Bruce Preston, Precautionary Saving and Consumption Fluctuations[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.95, No.4 (Sep.,2005):1119-1143.
[33]J. Y. Campbell and N. G. Mankiw, The Response of Consumption to Income, a Cross-section Investigation[J]. European Economic Review,1991:231-249.
[34]Joon Y. Park and Sang B. Hahn, Cointegrating Regressions with Time Varying Coefficients[J]. Econometric Theory, Vol.15, No.5 (Oct.,1999): 664-703.
[35]John Hassler, Uncertainty and the Timing of Automobile Purchases [J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol.103, No.2 (Jun.,2001):351-366.
[36]Kuznets S., National income since 1869[Z]. NBER,1946.
[37]Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, Steven B. Webb, Giancarlo Corsetti, Household Saving in Developing Countries:First Cross-Country Evidence[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.6, No.3 (Sep.,1992):529-547.
[38]Keynes, The general theory of employment, interest and money[M]. China Social Sciences Publishing House,1999.
[39]Kimball, M. S., Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large [J]. Econometrica,1990.
[40]Leser, C, Forms of Engel Functions[J]. Econometrica,1963,31 (4):694-703.
[41]Larry Samuelson, Information-Based Relative Consumption Effects[J]. Econometrica, Vol.72, No.1 (Jan.,2004):93-118.
[42]Lars-Hendrik Roller and Leonard Waverman, Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development:A Simultaneous Approach[J]. American Economic Review, Vol.91, No.4 (Sep.,2001):909-923.
[43]Li, X., Consumption Demand, Saving Behavior and Rational Expectations: An Application of Disequilibrium Modeling to China 1952-1992[J]. Applied Economics,1997,29:1410-1424.
[44]Lee A. Lillard and Yoram Weiss, Uncertain Health and Survival:Effects on End-of-Life Consumption[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 15, No.2, Structural Estimation in Applied Microeconomics (Apr.,1997): 254-268.
[45]Li, Mingche, A Logit Model of Homeownership[J]. Econometrica,1977,45: 1081-1097.
[46]Ma, G. N., Macroeconomic Disequilibrium, Structural Changes and the Household Savings and Money Demand in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1993,41 (1):115-136.
[47]Madsen, J. B., and McAleer, M., Direct Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis under Uncertainty, Inflationary Expectations and Liquidity Constraints[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics,2000, Vol.22.
[48]Modigliani, Franco and Shi Larry Cao, The Chinese Saving Puzzle and the Life-Cycle Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2004, Vol.42, No. 1:148-166.
[49]Mas-Colell, Andreu, Indivisible Commodities and General Equilibrium Theory[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, December 1977,16:443-457.
[50]Meng, X., Unemployment, Consumption Smoothing and Precautionary Saving in Urban China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2003, Vol.31, No.3:468-480.
[51]Monika B u tler, Neoclassical Life-Cycle Consumption:A Textbook Example[J]. Economic Theory, Vol.17, No.1 (Jan.,2001):209-221.
[52]Miles S. Kimball, Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large[J]. Econometrica, Vol.58, No.1 (Jan.,1990):53-73.
[53]Martin Browning and Annamaria Lusardi, Household Saving:Micro Theories and Micro Facts[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.34, No.4 (Dec., 1996):1797-1855.
[54]Naveen Kumar and Suresh Chand Aggarwal, Patterns of Consumption and Poverty in Delhi Slums[J]. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.38, No. 50(Dec.2003):5294-5300.
[55]Norman Loayza, Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, Luis Serven, Saving in Developing Countries:An Overview[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.14, No.3 (Sep.,2000):393-414.
[56]N. M. Arguea, C. Hsiao, G. A. Taylor, Estimating Consumer Preferences Using Market Data-An Application to Us Automobile Demand[J]. Journal of
Applied Econometrics, Vol.9, No.1 (Jan.-Mar.,1994):1-18.
[57]Ogaki, Masao and Reinhart, Carmen M., Measuring Intertemporal Substitution:The Role of Durable Goods[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1998,106(5):1078-1098.
[58]Philip A. Della Valle and Noriyoshi Oguchi, Distribution, the Aggregate Consumption Function and the Level of Economic Development:Some Cross-Country Results[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.84, No.6 (Dec.,1976):1325-1334.
[59]Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas and Jonathan A. Parker, Consumption over the Life Cycle[J]. Econometrica, Vol.70, No.1 (Jan.,2002):47-89.
[60]Patrick S. McCarthy, Market Price and Income Elasticities of New Vehicle Demands[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.78, No.3 (Aug., 1996):543-547.
[61]Parker, Jonathan A., The Reaction of House-hold Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes[J]. American Economic Review,1999b, 89(4):959-973.
[62]PICCIONE, M., and A. RUBINSTEIN, On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall[J]. Games and Economic Behavior,1997,20: 3-24.
[63]Qin, D. Aggregate Consumption and Income in China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,1991, Vol.15:132-141.
[64]Roy Batchelor and Pami Dua, Survey Expectations in the Time Series Consumption Function[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.74, No.4 (Nov.,1992):598-606.
[65]R. Glenn Hubbard, Jonathan Skinner, Stephen P. Zeldes, Precautionary Saving and Social Insurance[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.103, No. 2 (Apr.,1995):360-399.
[66]Richard Blundell and Ian Preston, Consumption Inequality and Income Uncertainty[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.113, No.2 (May, 1998):603-640.
[67]R. Agarwala and J. Drinkwater, Consumption Functions with Shifting Parameters Due to Socio-Economic Factors[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.54, No.1 (Feb.,1972):89-96.
[68]R. Hall, The Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle permanent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence [J]. Journal of Political Economics,1978: 312-336.
[69]Russell Cooper and John Haltiwanger, The Aggregate Implications of Machine Replacement:Theory and Evidence[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.83, No.3 (Jun.,1993):360-382.
[70]Skinner, Jonathan. Risky Income, Life Cycle Consumption and Precautionary Savings[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,1988,22(2):237-55.
[71]Sandmo, Agnar, The Effect of Uncertainty on Saving Decisions[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1970,37:82-114.
[72]Shiller, Robert J. Consumption, Asset Markets and Macroeconomic Fluctuations[J]. Carne-gie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1982, 17(0):203-38.
[73]Tsay, R., Outliers, Level Shifts in Time Series[J]. Journal of Forecasting, 1988:5-18.
[74]Thaler Richard H. and Shefrin H., An Economic Theory of Self-Control[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1981, Vol.89, No.2:392-406.
[75]Viscusi, W. K., and Evans, W. N., Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status:Estimates and Economic Implications[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,81:353-374.
[76]Working, H., Statistical Laws of Family Expenditure [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1943,38 (221):43-56.
[77]World Bank, World Development Report 1998/1999:Knowledge for Development[Z]. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.,1999.
[78]Yang, F., Consumption along the Life Cycle:How Different Is Housing?[Z].
University of Minnesota, Job market paper,2006.
[79]Yaari, M. E., On the Consumer's Lifetime Allocation Process[J]. International Economic Review,1964:304-317.
[80]Zeldes, S.P., Consumption and Liquidity Constraints:An Empirical Investigation[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1989,97:30-346.
[81]Zeldes, S. P., Optimal Consumption with Stochastic Income:Deviations from Certainty Equivalence[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1989.
[82]安格斯·迪顿.经济学与消费者行为[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[83]陈娟,林龙,叶阿忠.基于分位数回归的中国居民消费研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(02)
[84]陈湛匀.由“流动性陷阱”看我国利率杠杆的运用[J].经济研究,2001,(02).
[85]陈利平.高增长导致高储蓄：一个基于消费攀比的解释[J].世界经济,2005,(11).
[86]迪顿.理解消费[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,胡景北,鲁昌译,2003.
[87]多恩布什,费希尔.宏观经济学(第六版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,中译本,1997.
[88]多恩布什,费希尔,斯塔兹.宏观经济学(第八版)[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,2003.
[89]杜海韬,邓翔.流动性约束和不确定性状态下的预防性储蓄研究——中国城乡居民的消费特征分析[J].经济学(季刊),2005,(01).
[90]戴维·罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[91]范剑平.中国城乡居民消费结构的变化趋势[M].人民出版社,2001.
[92]方福前.中国居民消费需求不足原因研究——基于中国城乡分省数据[J].中国社会科学,2009,(02).
[93]高梦滔,和云,师慧丽.信息服务与农户收入：中国的经验证据[J].世界经济,2008,(06).
[94]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[95]杭斌,申春兰.经济转型中消费与收入的长期均衡关系和短期动态关系[J].管理世界,2004,(05).
[96]贺菊煌.消费函数分析[M].社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[97]洪源,肖海翔.政府民生消费性支出对居民消费的影响—基于中国居民消费行为的视角[J].财贸研究,2009,(04)
[98]胡书东.中国财政支出和民间消费需求之间的关系[J].中国社会科学,2002,(06).
[99]郝梅瑞.服务消费时代：居民消费升级的新阶段[J].消费经济,2006,(05).
[100]贾良定,陈秋霖.消费行为模型及其政策含义[J].经济研究,2001,(03).
[101]江林,马椿荣,康俊.我国与世界各国最终消费率的比较分析[J].消费经济,2009,(01).
[102]金晓彤,杨晓东.中国城镇居民消费行为变异的四个假说及其理论分析[J].管理世界,2004,(11).
[103]姜洋,邓翔.替代还是互补?—中国政府消费与居民消费关系实证分析[J].财贸研究,2009,(03).
[104]罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,王根蓓译,2003.
[105]罗楚亮.经济转轨、不确定性与城镇居民消费行为[J].经济研究,2004,(04).
[106]龙志和,周浩明.中国城镇居民预防性储蓄实证研究[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[107]龙志和,等.西方预防性储蓄假说评述[J].经济学动态,2000,(3).
[108]李晓西.转轨经济中的消费行为及理论假说[J].经济科学,1998,(04).
[109]李扬,殷剑峰.中国高储蓄率问题探究—1992—2003年中国资金流量表的分析[J].经济研究,2007,(06).
[110]李通屏.中国消费制度变迁研究[J].北京：经济科学出版社,2005.
[111]李军.收入差距对消费需求影响的定量分析[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2003,(09).
[112]李实,赵人伟.中国居民收入分配在研究[J].经济研究,1999,(04).
[113]李锐,朱喜.农户金融抑制及其福利损失的计量分析[J].经济研究,2007,(02).
[114]李文星,徐长生,艾春荣.中国人口年龄结构和居民消费：1989—2004[J]. 经济研究,2008,(07).
[115]李广众.政府支出与居民消费：替代还是互补[J].世界经济,2005,(05).
[116]李永友,丛树海.居民消费与中国财政政策的有效性：基于居民最优消费决策行为的经验分析[J].世界经济,2006,(05).
[117]刘文斌.收入差距对消费需求的制约[J].经济研究,2000,(09).
[118]刘建国.我国农户消费倾向偏低的原因分析[J].经济研究,1999,(03).
[119]刘兆博,马树才.基于微观面板数据的中国农民预防性储蓄研究[J].世界经济,2007,(02).
[120]刘强.谁挤占了消费需求：教育医疗住房三大支出负担过重[J].中国国情国力,2006,(10).
[121]卢方元,鲁敏.中国农村居民消费结构的Panel Data模型分析[J].数理统计与管理,2009,(01).
[122]马克思.资本论[M].人民出版社,1975.
[123]欧阳俊,刘建民,秦宛顺.居民消费流动性约束的实证分析[J].经济科学,2003,(05).
[124]裴春霞,孙世重.流动性约束条件下的中国居民预防性储蓄行为分析[J].金融研究,2004,(10).
[125]彭文平.消费的过渡敏感性假说及其在中国的应用[J].上海经济研究,2001,(05).
[126]彭海艳.影响中国农村居民消费结构的多因素实证分析[J].财贸研究,2009,(01).
[127]钱纳里,鲁宾逊,赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,中译本,1995.
[128]钱纳里等.发展的格局：1950-1970[M].中国财政经济出版社,1989.
[129]秦朵.居民消费与收入关系的总量研究[J].经济研究,1990,(07).
[130]齐天翔.经济转轨时期的中国居民储蓄研究[J].经济研究,2000,(09).
[131]瞿宛文.超赶共识监督下的中国产业政策模式—以汽车产业为例[J].经济学季刊,2009,(01).
[132]苏良军,何一峰.中国存在消费的“库兹得茨之谜”吗?—来自城乡面板数 据的经验支持[J].经济科学,2006，(02).
[133]施建淮,朱海婷.中国城市居民预防性储蓄及预防性储蓄动机：1999—2003[J].经济研究,2004,(10).
[134]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为[J].南开经济研究,2001,(01).
[135]宋振学,臧旭恒.边际效用分段递增的效用函数与预防性储蓄行为[J].消费经济,2007,(02).
[136]申朴,刘康兵.中国城镇居民消费行为过度敏感性的经验分析：兼论不确定性、流动性约束与利率[J].世界经济,2003,(01).
[137]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为[J].南开经济研究,2001,(01).
[138]宋铮.中国居民储蓄行为研究[J].金融研究,1999,(06).
[139]特伦斯·米尔斯.金融时间序列的经济计量学模型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2002.
[140]田岗.不确定性、融资约束与我国农村高储蓄现象的实证分析——一个包含融资约束的预防性储蓄模型及检验[J].经济科学,2005,(01).
[141]王津港,何锋.中国农村居民边际消费倾向变化分析[J].消费经济,2009,(02).
[142]王合绪,夏阳.中国居民消费的过度敏感性分析[J].经济科学,2000,(04).
[143]王端.下岗风险与消费需求[J].经济研究,2000,(02).
[144]万广华,张茵,牛建高.流动性约束、不确定性与中国居民消费[J].经济研究,2001,(11).
[145]万广华,史清华,汤树梅.转型经济中农户储蓄行为：中国农村的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,(05).
[146]余永定,李军.中国居民消费函数的理论与验证[J].中国社会科学,2000,(01).
[147]威廉·H·格林,计量经济分析[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[148]胥和平,张世贤.消费需求变动对跨世纪中国工业发展的影响[M].人民出版社,2001.
[149]徐绪松,陈彦斌.预防性储蓄模型及其不确定性分解[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(2).
[150]谢建国,陈漓高.政府支出与居民消费：一个基于跨期替代模型的中国经验分析[J].经济科学,2002,(06).
[151]袁志刚,宋铮.城镇居民消费行为变异与我国经济增长[J].经济研究,1999,(11).
[152]袁志刚,宋铮.消费理论的新发展及其在中国的应用[J].上海经济研究,1999,(06).
[153]袁志刚,宋铮.人口年龄结构、养老保险制度与最优储蓄率[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[154]袁志刚,朱国林.消费理论中的收入分配与总消费[J].中国社会科学,2002,(02).
[155]尹世杰.社会主义消费经济学[M].上海人民出版社,1983.
[156]尹世杰.再论以提高消费率拉动经济增长[J].社会科学,2006,(12).
[157]叶海云.试论流动性约束、短视行为与我国消费需求疲软的关系[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[158]杨子晖.政府消费与居民消费期内替代与跨期替代[J].世界经济,2006,(08).
[159]杨汝岱,朱诗娥.公平与效率不可兼得吗——基于居民边际消费倾向的研究[J].经济研究,2007,(12).
[160]周建,杨秀祯.我国农村消费行为变迁及城乡联动机制研究[J].经济研究,2009,(01).
[161]周先波,田凤平.非参数估计方法在长江和珠江三角洲地区城镇居民消费支出分析中的应用[J].经济学季刊,2008,(07).
[162]臧旭恒.中国消费函数研究[M].上海：上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994.
[163]臧旭恒等.居民资产与消费选择行为分析[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店上海分店,2001.
[164]臧旭恒.居民跨时预算约束与消费函数假定及验证[J].经济研究,1994,
(09).
[165]臧旭恒,张继海.收入分配对中国城镇居民消费需求影响的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005,(06).
[166]钟永建,肖梁.我国农村居民的平均消费倾向及需求收入弹性分析[J].农村经济,2007,(01)。
[167]朱春燕,臧旭恒.预防性储蓄理论—储蓄(消费)函数的新进展[J].经济研究,2001,(01).
[168]朱国林,范建勇,严燕.中国的消费不振与收入分配：理论和根据[J].经济研究,2002,(05).
[169]曾国安,胡晶晶.1990年以来中国居民消费率变动的实证分析[J].税务与经济,2006,(01).
[170]张东刚.消费需求的变动与近代中日经济增长[M].北京：人民出版社,2001.
[171]邹至庄.中国经济转轨[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,曹祖平等译,2005.
[2]Aart Kraay, Household Saving in China[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.14, No.3 (Sep.,2000), pp.545-570.
[3]Alessandra Guariglia and Byung-Yeon Kim, Earnings Uncertainty, Precautionary Saving and Moonlighting in Russia[J]. Journal of Population Economics, Vol.17, No.2 (Jun.,2004), pp.289-310.
[4]Ashok K. Lahiri, Dynamics of Asian Savings:The Role of Growth and Age Structure[J]. Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, Vol.36, No.1 (Mar., 1989), pp.228-261.
[5]BRANCH, E. R., The Consumer Expenditure Survey:A Comparative Analysis[J]. Monthly Labor Review,1994,117:47-55.
[6]Caballero, Ricardo J., Earning Uncertainty and Aggregate Wealth Accumulation[J]. American Economic Review,1991,81.
[7]Caballero, R. J., Durable Goods:An Explanation for Their Slow Adjustment[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1993, Vol.101, No.2.
[8]Carroll, C., Overland, J., and Weil, D., Saving and Growth with Habit formation[J]. American Economic Review,2000,90 (3):341-350.
[9]Carroll, Christopher D. and Miles S. Kimball, On the Concavity of the Consumption Function[J]. Econometrica,1996, Vol.64, No.4:985-990.
[10]Caballero Richardo J., An Explanation for Their Slow Adjustment[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1993. Vol.101, No.2:351-383.
[11]Caballero Richardo J., Expenditure on Durable Goods:A Case for Slow Adjustment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1990, Vol.105, No.3:728-742.
[12]Chen C. and Tiao G.C., Random Level-Shift Time Series Models, ARIMA Approximations and Level-Shift Detection[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,1990,8:83-92.
[13]Campell, J. Y. and N. G. Mankiw, The Response of Consumption to Income, a Cross-section Investigation[J]. European Economic Review,1991, Vol.35, No. 4:723-756.
[14]Cochrane, John H., A Simple Test of Consumption Insurance[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(5):957-976.
[15]Carroll, C. D., The Buffer Stock Theory of Saving:Some Macroeconomic Evidence[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1992,2:61-135.
[16]Deaton Angus, Household Saving in LDCs:Credit Markets, Insurance and Welfare[J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,1992, Vol.94, No.2:255-273.
[17]Dydan, Karen E., Jonathan Skinner and Stephen P. Zeldes, Do the Rich Save More? [J]. Journal of Political Economy,2004, Vol.112, No.2:340-443.
[18]Eberly, J. C, Adjustment of Consumers'Durables Stocks:Evidence from Automobile Purchases[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1994, Vol.102, No.3: 402-435.
[19]Epstein, L. G., and Z in, S. E., Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns:A Theoretical Framework[J]. Econometrica,1989,57:937-969.
[20]Flavin, M. A., Excess Sensitibity of Consumption to Current Income: Liquidity Constraints or Myopia[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,1985, Vol. 18:117-123.
[21]Faruk Gul and Wolfgang Pesendorfer, Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption[J]. Econometrica, Vol.72, No.1 (Jan.,2004):119-158.
[22]Fred Mannering and Clifford Winston. A Dynamic Empirical Analysis of Household Vehicle Ownership and Utilization [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.16, No.2 (Summer,1985):215-236.
[23]Friedman, M. A Theory of the Consumption Function[M]. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,1957.
[24]Grossman, S. J. and G. Laroque, Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods[J]. Econometrica,1990, Vol.58, No.1:25-51.
[25]GOURINCHAS, P. O., and J. A. PARKER, The Empirical Importance of Precautionary Saving[J]. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings),2001,91:406-412.
[26]Hall R., Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1978, (5): 971-987.
[27]Holland Hunter, Transport in Soviet and Chinese Development[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1965, Vol.14, No.1.
[28]Hassler, J., Variations in Risk and Fluctuations in Demand-A Theoretical Model[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1996,20 (6-7): 1115-1143.
[29]Hassler Uwe, Reasonable Spurious Regressions [J]. Econometric Theory, 1996, Vol.12, No.4:742-744.
[30]Hackl, P., Economic Structural Change[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag,2005: 43-70.
[31]Hayne E. Leland, Saving and Uncertainty:The Precautionary Demand for Saving[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.82, No.3 (Aug.,1968): 465-473.
[32]Jonathan A. Parker and Bruce Preston, Precautionary Saving and Consumption Fluctuations[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.95, No.4 (Sep.,2005):1119-1143.
[33]J. Y. Campbell and N. G. Mankiw, The Response of Consumption to Income, a Cross-section Investigation[J]. European Economic Review,1991:231-249.
[34]Joon Y. Park and Sang B. Hahn, Cointegrating Regressions with Time Varying Coefficients[J]. Econometric Theory, Vol.15, No.5 (Oct.,1999): 664-703.
[35]John Hassler, Uncertainty and the Timing of Automobile Purchases [J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol.103, No.2 (Jun.,2001):351-366.
[36]Kuznets S., National income since 1869[Z]. NBER,1946.
[37]Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, Steven B. Webb, Giancarlo Corsetti, Household Saving in Developing Countries:First Cross-Country Evidence[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.6, No.3 (Sep.,1992):529-547.
[38]Keynes, The general theory of employment, interest and money[M]. China Social Sciences Publishing House,1999.
[39]Kimball, M. S., Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large [J]. Econometrica,1990.
[40]Leser, C, Forms of Engel Functions[J]. Econometrica,1963,31 (4):694-703.
[41]Larry Samuelson, Information-Based Relative Consumption Effects[J]. Econometrica, Vol.72, No.1 (Jan.,2004):93-118.
[42]Lars-Hendrik Roller and Leonard Waverman, Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development:A Simultaneous Approach[J]. American Economic Review, Vol.91, No.4 (Sep.,2001):909-923.
[43]Li, X., Consumption Demand, Saving Behavior and Rational Expectations: An Application of Disequilibrium Modeling to China 1952-1992[J]. Applied Economics,1997,29:1410-1424.
[44]Lee A. Lillard and Yoram Weiss, Uncertain Health and Survival:Effects on End-of-Life Consumption[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 15, No.2, Structural Estimation in Applied Microeconomics (Apr.,1997): 254-268.
[45]Li, Mingche, A Logit Model of Homeownership[J]. Econometrica,1977,45: 1081-1097.
[46]Ma, G. N., Macroeconomic Disequilibrium, Structural Changes and the Household Savings and Money Demand in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1993,41 (1):115-136.
[47]Madsen, J. B., and McAleer, M., Direct Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis under Uncertainty, Inflationary Expectations and Liquidity Constraints[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics,2000, Vol.22.
[48]Modigliani, Franco and Shi Larry Cao, The Chinese Saving Puzzle and the Life-Cycle Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2004, Vol.42, No. 1:148-166.
[49]Mas-Colell, Andreu, Indivisible Commodities and General Equilibrium Theory[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, December 1977,16:443-457.
[50]Meng, X., Unemployment, Consumption Smoothing and Precautionary Saving in Urban China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2003, Vol.31, No.3:468-480.
[51]Monika B u tler, Neoclassical Life-Cycle Consumption:A Textbook Example[J]. Economic Theory, Vol.17, No.1 (Jan.,2001):209-221.
[52]Miles S. Kimball, Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large[J]. Econometrica, Vol.58, No.1 (Jan.,1990):53-73.
[53]Martin Browning and Annamaria Lusardi, Household Saving:Micro Theories and Micro Facts[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.34, No.4 (Dec., 1996):1797-1855.
[54]Naveen Kumar and Suresh Chand Aggarwal, Patterns of Consumption and Poverty in Delhi Slums[J]. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.38, No. 50(Dec.2003):5294-5300.
[55]Norman Loayza, Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, Luis Serven, Saving in Developing Countries:An Overview[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.14, No.3 (Sep.,2000):393-414.
[56]N. M. Arguea, C. Hsiao, G. A. Taylor, Estimating Consumer Preferences Using Market Data-An Application to Us Automobile Demand[J]. Journal of
Applied Econometrics, Vol.9, No.1 (Jan.-Mar.,1994):1-18.
[57]Ogaki, Masao and Reinhart, Carmen M., Measuring Intertemporal Substitution:The Role of Durable Goods[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1998,106(5):1078-1098.
[58]Philip A. Della Valle and Noriyoshi Oguchi, Distribution, the Aggregate Consumption Function and the Level of Economic Development:Some Cross-Country Results[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.84, No.6 (Dec.,1976):1325-1334.
[59]Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas and Jonathan A. Parker, Consumption over the Life Cycle[J]. Econometrica, Vol.70, No.1 (Jan.,2002):47-89.
[60]Patrick S. McCarthy, Market Price and Income Elasticities of New Vehicle Demands[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.78, No.3 (Aug., 1996):543-547.
[61]Parker, Jonathan A., The Reaction of House-hold Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes[J]. American Economic Review,1999b, 89(4):959-973.
[62]PICCIONE, M., and A. RUBINSTEIN, On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall[J]. Games and Economic Behavior,1997,20: 3-24.
[63]Qin, D. Aggregate Consumption and Income in China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,1991, Vol.15:132-141.
[64]Roy Batchelor and Pami Dua, Survey Expectations in the Time Series Consumption Function[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.74, No.4 (Nov.,1992):598-606.
[65]R. Glenn Hubbard, Jonathan Skinner, Stephen P. Zeldes, Precautionary Saving and Social Insurance[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.103, No. 2 (Apr.,1995):360-399.
[66]Richard Blundell and Ian Preston, Consumption Inequality and Income Uncertainty[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.113, No.2 (May, 1998):603-640.
[67]R. Agarwala and J. Drinkwater, Consumption Functions with Shifting Parameters Due to Socio-Economic Factors[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.54, No.1 (Feb.,1972):89-96.
[68]R. Hall, The Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle permanent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence [J]. Journal of Political Economics,1978: 312-336.
[69]Russell Cooper and John Haltiwanger, The Aggregate Implications of Machine Replacement:Theory and Evidence[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.83, No.3 (Jun.,1993):360-382.
[70]Skinner, Jonathan. Risky Income, Life Cycle Consumption and Precautionary Savings[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,1988,22(2):237-55.
[71]Sandmo, Agnar, The Effect of Uncertainty on Saving Decisions[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1970,37:82-114.
[72]Shiller, Robert J. Consumption, Asset Markets and Macroeconomic Fluctuations[J]. Carne-gie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1982, 17(0):203-38.
[73]Tsay, R., Outliers, Level Shifts in Time Series[J]. Journal of Forecasting, 1988:5-18.
[74]Thaler Richard H. and Shefrin H., An Economic Theory of Self-Control[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1981, Vol.89, No.2:392-406.
[75]Viscusi, W. K., and Evans, W. N., Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status:Estimates and Economic Implications[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,81:353-374.
[76]Working, H., Statistical Laws of Family Expenditure [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1943,38 (221):43-56.
[77]World Bank, World Development Report 1998/1999:Knowledge for Development[Z]. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.,1999.
[78]Yang, F., Consumption along the Life Cycle:How Different Is Housing?[Z].
University of Minnesota, Job market paper,2006.
[79]Yaari, M. E., On the Consumer's Lifetime Allocation Process[J]. International Economic Review,1964:304-317.
[80]Zeldes, S.P., Consumption and Liquidity Constraints:An Empirical Investigation[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1989,97:30-346.
[81]Zeldes, S. P., Optimal Consumption with Stochastic Income:Deviations from Certainty Equivalence[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1989.
[82]安格斯·迪顿.经济学与消费者行为[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[83]陈娟,林龙,叶阿忠.基于分位数回归的中国居民消费研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(02)
[84]陈湛匀.由“流动性陷阱”看我国利率杠杆的运用[J].经济研究,2001,(02).
[85]陈利平.高增长导致高储蓄：一个基于消费攀比的解释[J].世界经济,2005,(11).
[86]迪顿.理解消费[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,胡景北,鲁昌译,2003.
[87]多恩布什,费希尔.宏观经济学(第六版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,中译本,1997.
[88]多恩布什,费希尔,斯塔兹.宏观经济学(第八版)[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,2003.
[89]杜海韬,邓翔.流动性约束和不确定性状态下的预防性储蓄研究——中国城乡居民的消费特征分析[J].经济学(季刊),2005,(01).
[90]戴维·罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[91]范剑平.中国城乡居民消费结构的变化趋势[M].人民出版社,2001.
[92]方福前.中国居民消费需求不足原因研究——基于中国城乡分省数据[J].中国社会科学,2009,(02).
[93]高梦滔,和云,师慧丽.信息服务与农户收入：中国的经验证据[J].世界经济,2008,(06).
[94]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[95]杭斌,申春兰.经济转型中消费与收入的长期均衡关系和短期动态关系[J].管理世界,2004,(05).
[96]贺菊煌.消费函数分析[M].社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[97]洪源,肖海翔.政府民生消费性支出对居民消费的影响—基于中国居民消费行为的视角[J].财贸研究,2009,(04)
[98]胡书东.中国财政支出和民间消费需求之间的关系[J].中国社会科学,2002,(06).
[99]郝梅瑞.服务消费时代：居民消费升级的新阶段[J].消费经济,2006,(05).
[100]贾良定,陈秋霖.消费行为模型及其政策含义[J].经济研究,2001,(03).
[101]江林,马椿荣,康俊.我国与世界各国最终消费率的比较分析[J].消费经济,2009,(01).
[102]金晓彤,杨晓东.中国城镇居民消费行为变异的四个假说及其理论分析[J].管理世界,2004,(11).
[103]姜洋,邓翔.替代还是互补?—中国政府消费与居民消费关系实证分析[J].财贸研究,2009,(03).
[104]罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,王根蓓译,2003.
[105]罗楚亮.经济转轨、不确定性与城镇居民消费行为[J].经济研究,2004,(04).
[106]龙志和,周浩明.中国城镇居民预防性储蓄实证研究[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[107]龙志和,等.西方预防性储蓄假说评述[J].经济学动态,2000,(3).
[108]李晓西.转轨经济中的消费行为及理论假说[J].经济科学,1998,(04).
[109]李扬,殷剑峰.中国高储蓄率问题探究—1992—2003年中国资金流量表的分析[J].经济研究,2007,(06).
[110]李通屏.中国消费制度变迁研究[J].北京：经济科学出版社,2005.
[111]李军.收入差距对消费需求影响的定量分析[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2003,(09).
[112]李实,赵人伟.中国居民收入分配在研究[J].经济研究,1999,(04).
[113]李锐,朱喜.农户金融抑制及其福利损失的计量分析[J].经济研究,2007,(02).
[114]李文星,徐长生,艾春荣.中国人口年龄结构和居民消费：1989—2004[J]. 经济研究,2008,(07).
[115]李广众.政府支出与居民消费：替代还是互补[J].世界经济,2005,(05).
[116]李永友,丛树海.居民消费与中国财政政策的有效性：基于居民最优消费决策行为的经验分析[J].世界经济,2006,(05).
[117]刘文斌.收入差距对消费需求的制约[J].经济研究,2000,(09).
[118]刘建国.我国农户消费倾向偏低的原因分析[J].经济研究,1999,(03).
[119]刘兆博,马树才.基于微观面板数据的中国农民预防性储蓄研究[J].世界经济,2007,(02).
[120]刘强.谁挤占了消费需求：教育医疗住房三大支出负担过重[J].中国国情国力,2006,(10).
[121]卢方元,鲁敏.中国农村居民消费结构的Panel Data模型分析[J].数理统计与管理,2009,(01).
[122]马克思.资本论[M].人民出版社,1975.
[123]欧阳俊,刘建民,秦宛顺.居民消费流动性约束的实证分析[J].经济科学,2003,(05).
[124]裴春霞,孙世重.流动性约束条件下的中国居民预防性储蓄行为分析[J].金融研究,2004,(10).
[125]彭文平.消费的过渡敏感性假说及其在中国的应用[J].上海经济研究,2001,(05).
[126]彭海艳.影响中国农村居民消费结构的多因素实证分析[J].财贸研究,2009,(01).
[127]钱纳里,鲁宾逊,赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,中译本,1995.
[128]钱纳里等.发展的格局：1950-1970[M].中国财政经济出版社,1989.
[129]秦朵.居民消费与收入关系的总量研究[J].经济研究,1990,(07).
[130]齐天翔.经济转轨时期的中国居民储蓄研究[J].经济研究,2000,(09).
[131]瞿宛文.超赶共识监督下的中国产业政策模式—以汽车产业为例[J].经济学季刊,2009,(01).
[132]苏良军,何一峰.中国存在消费的“库兹得茨之谜”吗?—来自城乡面板数 据的经验支持[J].经济科学,2006，(02).
[133]施建淮,朱海婷.中国城市居民预防性储蓄及预防性储蓄动机：1999—2003[J].经济研究,2004,(10).
[134]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为[J].南开经济研究,2001,(01).
[135]宋振学,臧旭恒.边际效用分段递增的效用函数与预防性储蓄行为[J].消费经济,2007,(02).
[136]申朴,刘康兵.中国城镇居民消费行为过度敏感性的经验分析：兼论不确定性、流动性约束与利率[J].世界经济,2003,(01).
[137]孙凤.预防性储蓄理论与中国居民消费行为[J].南开经济研究,2001,(01).
[138]宋铮.中国居民储蓄行为研究[J].金融研究,1999,(06).
[139]特伦斯·米尔斯.金融时间序列的经济计量学模型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2002.
[140]田岗.不确定性、融资约束与我国农村高储蓄现象的实证分析——一个包含融资约束的预防性储蓄模型及检验[J].经济科学,2005,(01).
[141]王津港,何锋.中国农村居民边际消费倾向变化分析[J].消费经济,2009,(02).
[142]王合绪,夏阳.中国居民消费的过度敏感性分析[J].经济科学,2000,(04).
[143]王端.下岗风险与消费需求[J].经济研究,2000,(02).
[144]万广华,张茵,牛建高.流动性约束、不确定性与中国居民消费[J].经济研究,2001,(11).
[145]万广华,史清华,汤树梅.转型经济中农户储蓄行为：中国农村的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,(05).
[146]余永定,李军.中国居民消费函数的理论与验证[J].中国社会科学,2000,(01).
[147]威廉·H·格林,计量经济分析[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[148]胥和平,张世贤.消费需求变动对跨世纪中国工业发展的影响[M].人民出版社,2001.
[149]徐绪松,陈彦斌.预防性储蓄模型及其不确定性分解[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(2).
[150]谢建国,陈漓高.政府支出与居民消费：一个基于跨期替代模型的中国经验分析[J].经济科学,2002,(06).
[151]袁志刚,宋铮.城镇居民消费行为变异与我国经济增长[J].经济研究,1999,(11).
[152]袁志刚,宋铮.消费理论的新发展及其在中国的应用[J].上海经济研究,1999,(06).
[153]袁志刚,宋铮.人口年龄结构、养老保险制度与最优储蓄率[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[154]袁志刚,朱国林.消费理论中的收入分配与总消费[J].中国社会科学,2002,(02).
[155]尹世杰.社会主义消费经济学[M].上海人民出版社,1983.
[156]尹世杰.再论以提高消费率拉动经济增长[J].社会科学,2006,(12).
[157]叶海云.试论流动性约束、短视行为与我国消费需求疲软的关系[J].经济研究,2000,(11).
[158]杨子晖.政府消费与居民消费期内替代与跨期替代[J].世界经济,2006,(08).
[159]杨汝岱,朱诗娥.公平与效率不可兼得吗——基于居民边际消费倾向的研究[J].经济研究,2007,(12).
[160]周建,杨秀祯.我国农村消费行为变迁及城乡联动机制研究[J].经济研究,2009,(01).
[161]周先波,田凤平.非参数估计方法在长江和珠江三角洲地区城镇居民消费支出分析中的应用[J].经济学季刊,2008,(07).
[162]臧旭恒.中国消费函数研究[M].上海：上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994.
[163]臧旭恒等.居民资产与消费选择行为分析[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店上海分店,2001.
[164]臧旭恒.居民跨时预算约束与消费函数假定及验证[J].经济研究,1994,
(09).
[165]臧旭恒,张继海.收入分配对中国城镇居民消费需求影响的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005,(06).
[166]钟永建,肖梁.我国农村居民的平均消费倾向及需求收入弹性分析[J].农村经济,2007,(01)。
[167]朱春燕,臧旭恒.预防性储蓄理论—储蓄(消费)函数的新进展[J].经济研究,2001,(01).
[168]朱国林,范建勇,严燕.中国的消费不振与收入分配：理论和根据[J].经济研究,2002,(05).
[169]曾国安,胡晶晶.1990年以来中国居民消费率变动的实证分析[J].税务与经济,2006,(01).
[170]张东刚.消费需求的变动与近代中日经济增长[M].北京：人民出版社,2001.
[171]邹至庄.中国经济转轨[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,曹祖平等译,2005.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |