用户名: 密码: 验证码:
投资生态理论及其实践研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
截止2009年底,中国吸收外商投资已连续18年高居发展中国家首位。改革开放30年来,外商投资在弥补中国建设资会不足的同时,已经成为影响中国经济增长、就业、技术进步的重要因素。从国内各地区来看,东部沿海地区与中西部欠发达地区的发展差距在某种程度上与各地区对外资利用的情况呈现明显的正相关关系。正因如此,我国许多地区都把吸引外来投资作为促进地区经济发展的一个重要手段。当各地区把引进外资作为促进经济、社会发展的重要动力时却往往忽视了一个问题:为什么要引进外资?
     由于对引资问题缺乏深刻的系统思考,不少地方尤其是内陆欠发达省份脱离自身经济发展实际,盲目引资,已经开始给地区发展带来极大的负面效应。作为内陆欠发达地区的山西省,多年来连续实施大开放战略,下大力气开展招商引资活动,但吸收外商投资却始终在低水平徘徊,并连续六年居中部六省末位。山西拥有丰富的自然资源、人文资源,区位优势独特,作为国家唯一的煤炭工业可持续发展政策措施试点省份,恰逢历史上难得的“黄金战略发展期”,山西省政府和民众有着强烈的发展愿望,但为什么山西的引资乃至经济发展难有大的起色和突破?这些问题一直困扰着笔者。为此,在博士研究的方向上选择了吸收外商投资问题的研究,希望能够破解当前中国尤其是山西等内陆欠发达省份在吸收外商投资上的困惑与难题。
     当前国际直接投资理论,无论是跨国公司对外投资理论还是引进外资理论,都是基于投资者在投资活动中的主导地位来研究的。从传统的引资理论来看,一个区域要吸引外商投资必须创造良好的投资环境。所以,很多地区为了引进外资不断地改善本地的投资环境,这种改善投资环境的措施更多地体现在出台各种鼓励外商投资的政策和优惠措施。这种对外商的优惠政策目的是为了引进外资,改善本地的发展能力。但是,在引进外资的过程中忽视了外资企业对区域投资环境的反作用。
     从生物学或生态学的知识我们受到启发:生命体与其生存环境之间构成的生态系统是一个协同演化的系统。本文试图从投资生态系统(Investment Ecosystem)的视角来研究引资问题。在对国际投资理论和观点学习、研究、分析、吸收和借鉴的基础上,从生态学和生态系统一般规律出发,提出了投资生态系统的理论与方法。
     在投资生态系统中,投资者之间,投资者与投资项目、投资环境等多种投资生态因子之间的作用和影响是相互的、错综复杂的,因而投资生态系统是一个复杂的巨系统。同时投资生态系统在各种因子的相互作用下,又处于不断的动态变化之中。投资生态会经历一个从简单到复杂、从不成熟到成熟的发育过程。
     投资者和引资者(地区)都是投资生态系统中组成部分,同时他们也都与投资生态系统中的其他要素相互作用、相互影响。投资者和引资者虽然都会对投资环境造成影响,但是投资者对投资生态系统的影响更多是客观的后果,而并非投资者的主观目的。引资者(地区)对投资生态系统的影响更多是出于主观愿望和主动的行动。引资者希望通过对投资生态系统的影响来达到促进其不断向好的方向演化发展的目的。要达到这样的目的就必须主动地对投资生态系统进行调控,这种调控体现在以下三个方面:(一)优化投资生态位,吸引优质投资者;(二)扩展投资生态承载力,吸引更多投资者;(三)保持投资生态系统的动态平衡。实现投资生态平衡必须解决两个问题,即,对投资者而言,要研究如何选择投资生态环境以及如何适应投资生态环境;对投资生态环境的拥有方—引资者而言,要研究如何改善投资生态环境和如何选择投资者。也就是说,投资的成败取决于投资者对投资生态环境的选择和适应,引资的成败取决于投资生态环境的改善和对投资者的选择。只有这两个问题得到解决,投资生态达到平衡(动态)时,投资、引资双方才能达到“相互满足,互利共赢”。因此,作为引资者,首先应该明白自己的引资需求,即“为什么引资,引进什么样的投资者”,并在此基础上分析潜在投资者的需求,从而有针对性地改善投资环境,满足投资者需求,进而实现自身需求的满足,达到引资收益最大化。
     本文在此理论基础上,首先对中国和山西的投资生态演化做了动态分析。中国正处于对外开放的全面转型时期,今后必将更加注重吸收外商投资的科学性问题。随着政府职能进一步转变、市场进一步开放、投资环境进一步改善,满足投资者需求的能力将进一步提高;随着外资管理的进一步规范,中国更加注重引资质量和效率,自身发展需求必将得到更大的满足。因此,从今后较长一段时间看,中国投资生态系统将会进一步改善并趋于平衡,对国际投资者的吸引力会进一步增强。接着分析了山西投资生态的演化历程。改革开放至今山西外资虽取得了一些成绩,但总体上不尽人意,山西外商投资存在规模小、层次低、贡献度不足、外商投资企业发育不良、效益不佳、引资后劲乏力等诸多问题,同时引资中的环境污染、土地浪费、税收流失、虚假外资、中方利益损失等问题不容忽视。尽管山西的引资问题有国家宏观政策因素影响的原因,但根源在于自身投资生态系统失衡,在于投资环境不佳、缺乏对自身需求的研究和定位,缺乏对投资者的研究和正确选择。而观念保守落后、政府缺位和错位、体制僵化和改革滞后又是造成投资生态系统失衡的症结所在。
     本文从投资生态演化入手,对当前山西省投资生态因子现状及演化趋势进行了分析。山西拥有丰厚的矿产资源,拥有丰富独特的旅游资源、底蕴深厚的历史文化资源,有承东启西、连接南北的区位优势,拥有其他省份不具有的人缘地缘优势,但是均存在开发利用不足的问题,以致这些优势在引资中未得到充分发挥。同时土地、水资源、生态和环境容量、人力和科技资源的总量、结构和档次等投资生态因子制约着山西引资和经济社会发展。本文同时对山西所面临的宏观环境进行了分析,认为,作为全国煤炭工业可持续发展政策措施试点省、循环经济试点省、生态建设试点省,山西正面临着吸收外商投资和经济社会可持续发展的“黄金发展期”,同时也是“矛盾凸显期”。2008年三季度以来金融危机及国家实施的一系列宏观调控政策给山西引资、优化投资生态也带来了新的机遇和挑战。如何抓住机遇,化危为机,加大对投资生态系统的调控,努力实现投资生态平衡是解决问题的关键。
     在对山西投资生态系统分析的基础上,本文从引资理念、引资者需求、投资者选择和投资环境优化等方面提出山西省引资的对策和建议。山西应首先明确吸收外商投资的意义不仅在于弥补资金缺口,更在于引进先进的技术、管理和理念,促进产业升级和发展方式转变,在于推动思想解放、观念更新,在于推动经济体制和行政管理体制改革和创新。因而对外开放和引进外资应成为山西省改革和经济社会发展的催化剂、助力器。在引资中,要处理好“引资”与“为我所用”的关系、“引资”与“引智”的关系;要“引进来”,更要“留得住”;要树立经济可持续发展和“互利共赢”的理念;要发挥山西引资的“后发优势”,绕开“低水平引资陷阱”和“先污染,后治理”的模式陷阱。山西要强化外商投资的产业和地区导向,引导外资投资优势产业、潜力产业和“软肋”产业,引导外资投向经济社会发展的重点区域。要研究如何更好地满足投资者需求,优化投资环境,实施观念创新、体制创新、科技创新,法律政策再造和环境再造。为吸引投资者,山西应加大投资促进力度,拓宽引资渠道和方式,提高投资促进的专业性和科学性,充分利用开放平台,加强国际交流,加强友好合作关系和区域合作。
     本文综合运用投资生态理论与方法,实证研究与规范研究、均衡分析、问卷调查和案例分析、复杂性分析、趋势分析等多种方法对中国和山西省的引资问题和对策建议进行了系统的分析和研究。
     本文在理论和方法上有一定的创新之处。
     (1)本文提出了投资生态理论及其方法,并用来分析并尝试解决中国尤其是山西等内陆省份的吸收外商投资活动。本理论突破了投资者主导投资活动的理论范式,强调投资者与引资者的相互作用、协同演化。尝试为发展中国家和地区招商选资以及通过引资促进经济社会的可持续发展提供了理论依据。明确提出了投资生态理论要研究两个基本问题,即,对投资者而言,要研究如何选择投资生态环境以及如何适应投资生态环境;对引资方而言,要研究如何改善投资生态环境和如何选择投资者。提出解决以上两个问题、达到投资生态平衡是实现投资者与引资方“互利共赢”的根本途径。
     (2)初步建立了投资生态系统作用模型。
     (3)运用投资生态理论对中国投资生态演化进行了动态分析,并对山西省投资生态进行了较为深入的实证分析。
     (4)在投资生态理论指导下,站在引资方角度,从引资理念、引资者需求、投资者选择、投资生态环境优化等方面,提出了山西省引进外资工作的对策和建议;文中应用部分不仅对山西而且对中国其它内陆省份都具有普遍的适用意义。
     (5)本文提出的投资生态理论对于投资活动和引资活动具有普遍的适用性。对于引资地区,不仅适用于其引进外资的研究,同样适用于吸收国内投资、吸收民间投资的研究;而从投资者角度,对引资地区投资生态环境的选择和适应这一命题的提出,对于投资者,尤其是当前中国企业积极稳妥地开展境外投资也具有现实意义和实际应用价值。
By the end of the year 2009, China has experienced the eighteenth consecutive year as the top developing country in terms of the investment quantity attracted from overseas resources. The sufficient amount of overseas investment has greatly promoted the rapid social and economical development of the country. However, statistics indicate that only a minor portion of these overseas investments comes from hi-tech oriented large international corporations headquartered in developed countries, and the merging projects, which are normally the typical approach of international direct investment, have proved to be very rare. This tendency is actually not in conformity with the investment demand of the country. At the same time, a number of provinces, especially the comparatively less developed inland provinces, have been found attracting overseas investments only for its own sake without a scientific blue print to better address their actual economical development bottlenecks. Consequently, urgent needs have been experienced to better ensure that overseas investment be attracted on a scientific decision making basis.
     As one of the less developed inland provinces, Shanxi has been exerting significant efforts to implement the opening up strategy. However, despite these hard endeavors, the investment attracted from overseas resources in this province has been ranking the last among the six peer provinces during the past six years. Shanxi province enjoys abundant natural resources endowment, rich historical and cultural resources as well as advantageous geographical location. As the only demonstration province for coal industrial sustainable development in China, Shanxi has been experiencing a gold age of economical boom in recent years, and both the government and the grassroots have very strong desires to take advantage of the overseas investment to help with its own social and economical development. Thus, what exactly is the bottleneck to the overseas investment to this province?
     With over ten years of experiences of overseas investment management on behalf of the provincial government, the writer has been studying these confronting issues all the time. And the very choice of study area for the doctorate program has been intended to help investigate into the existing shortcomings in the overseas investment policies and implementation management in China, so as to ensure a breakthrough in dealing with these problems in the country and in Shanxi Province in particular.
     Temporary direct international investment theories and practices have been focusing attentions solely on the part of the investment without sufficiently addressing the specific demand of the intended investment environment. With the deepening process of economical globalization, especially at the background that the concept of sustainable development has already been established and accepted in the developing countries, more and more emphasis have been attached to the principles of harmonious development and win-win practices. This study intends to establish a mechanism to achieve the mutual benefit and win-win objectives during the transactions between the international investment corporations and the countries and areas that attract these investments. In order to achieve this ambitious target, the writer has made a thorough study of the existing theories and practices in international direct investment under the kind guidance of the tutor, and carefully investigated into the actual policies and practices of attracting the overseas investments as adopted in the inland provinces like Shanxi as well as the other provinces in China. On the basis of these investigations, the writer analyzed the interactive mechanism among the investment, the parties attracting the investment, the investment environment and the investment projects from the perspectives of ecology and ecological balance, and proposed the methodologies of investment ecological system study which is hoped to be adopted to tackle with the existing problems and inefficiencies in the practice of attracting overseas investment in China, especially in the inland provinces like Shanxi.
     Investment ecological theory points out that the investment ecological environment is the decisive factor of the actual benefit achieved by the investment and the party attracted and utilized the investment through the investment activities. The investment and the investment environment, or more exactly the party that attracts the investment and thus offers the investment environment, interacts with each other by adapting their decision making, policies and practices, so as to eventually satisfy the actual needs of the other party, and thus reaching an investment ecological balance. In order to reach such a balance, the party of investment should carefully study its choice of investment environment and its adaptability to such an environment, while the party attracting and utilizing the investment should study how to improve the investment environment it offers and its choice of potential investments. That is to say, the success of the investment depends upon its choice of the investment environment and its own adaptability to the environment, while the success of the party attracting and utilizing the investment depends upon how it improves the investment environment it offers and its choice of the appropriate investment. Only when the pursuits of the investment and the party utilizing the investment are in line with each other that the objectives of mutual benefit and mutual satisfaction could be achieved. Consequently, the party attracting the investment should first of all obtain a clear understanding of its own objectives of using these investment, or why use the investment and what kind of investment. On the basis of this clear understanding of its own objectives, it should then proceed to investigate into the demand of the potential investment that could help achieve these objectives, and take specific measures to improve its investment environment so as to ensure that the demand of the investment is satisfied. Only by so doing could its own demand be satisfied in turn and thus maximize the benefit of the investment project.
     On the basis of the above theoretical analyses, the paper also carried out a number of case studies of investment and attracting investment practices both in Shanxi province and in China as a whole. Through thorough analyses of the statistics obtained from Shanxi province, the paper comes to the conclusion that the problems experienced by Shanxi province all resulted from its imbalanced investment ecological system. With the SWOT approach, the paper evaluated both the advantages and the disadvantages of the various factors in the investment ecosystem in Shanxi province, especially in light of the recent global financial crisis and the various new policies issued and implemented by the national government to deal with this crisis. Policy recommendations were then put forward for Shanxi province to improve its investment ecosystem environment.
     The paper pointed out that China is experiencing a transitional period in terms of its strategies of attracting overseas investment. With the further transformation of the government functions and the deepening of the reform policies in the financial system, the investment ecological environment in China shall be further improved so as to improve its capabilities of satisfying the demands of the potential investments. Meanwhile, with the standardization process of overseas investment management, more and more attention shall be paid to improve the quality of the investments attracted and the efficiency of attracting investment, so as to better satisfy its own development requirements.
     Over the past 30 years after the reform and opening up policies were implemented, the overseas investments attracted to Shanxi province has been taking a very active role in Shanxi province in promoting the international oriented trade, the improvement of the investment environment, the social and economical reform as well as the practice of international traditions. However, such problems have also been observed in this province in the field of overseas investment as insignificant total amount, comparatively low quality and low contribution to the economy, low benefit level, significant environment pollution, and waste of land resources and lack of insurance of the safety of counterpart funds. The paper pointed out that all these problems rooted more from the imbalanced structure of its investment ecological system than from the macro national economical policies, and the imbalanced structure of the investment ecosystem is in turn due to the inappropriate direction of overseas investment utilization, lack of clear understanding of its own priorities of overseas investment demand, insufficient investment promotion mechanism, lack of sufficient study of the demands and objectives of the overseas investment and thus inappropriate choice of overseas investment sources. Meanwhile, the inactions or misbehaviors of the government and the inappropriate investment management concepts and mechanism proved to be the best manifestation of this imbalance.
     Shanxi province enjoys very abundant natural resources, rich tourism resources and cultural inherits. It also boasts the very advantageous geographical location by connecting the to-be-developed vast west regions and the east costal areas. However, all these endowment has not yet been taken full advantage of yet in the process of attracting overseas investment. Besides, such factors essential in the investment ecosystem as the insufficient capacity of land resources, water resources, ecological system and environment, the total available human and technology resources all constricted the inflow of overseas investment into this province and in consequence the overall social and economical development. Now that Shanxi province has already been chosen by the national government as the demonstration province for coal industrial sustainable development, cycling-oriented economical development pattern and ecological system construction, it shall certainly experience a gold age of overall social and economical development, which shall surely be able to attract overseas investment at a much faster pace and volume. Furthermore, the recent macro economical policies adopted by the national government to minimize the adverse effect of the global financial crisis since the third quarter of the year 2008 shall also offer more development opportunities for Shanxi province as well. However, it can be reasonably anticipated that during this process, more problems shall occur and needs to be more appropriately addressed in the field of overseas investment management. Consequently, whether the province could take full advantage of these development opportunities shall largely depend upon whether it could appropriately adjust its development strategies, especially its overseas investment utilization and management strategies.
     In view of this adjustment, the paper raised a series of policy recommendations for Shanxi province all aiming at improving its investment ecosystem. These policy recommendations cover the areas of establishment of correct investment attracting principles, optimization of investment ecological environment, satisfying the specific demands of the potential investments and investment promotion. Introduction of overseas investment to Shanxi province would not only help to mitigate the development bottleneck of insufficient funding, but more importantly help to introduce advanced modern technologies and management concepts, promote the reform and reconstruction of the economical structure, the administration structure and the existing development pattern, and foster the creativity, so as to sustain the overall social and economical development. Intense attentions should be paid to better balance the introduction of investment and its own development objectives and demands, introduction of investment and introduction of advanced technologies and concepts, so as to make sure that the investment projects could have a sustainable development potential in the province. Specific efforts should be exerted to avoid pollution intensive investment projects and take full advantage of its overseas investment introduction potentials.
     With a accurate understanding of its own development bottlenecks and demands, Shanxi should offer more clear-cut guidance to the potential investments in regard with the industries and regions that demand these investment. Priorities should be given to the industries with significant development potentials and industries that urgently need rapid development, and key development areas as defined in the long term social and economical development program. At the same time, Shanxi should take immediate measures to optimize its investment ecological environment to better address the needs of the investment. In order to achieve this target, Shanxi should enhance its decision making system and further expand its investment introduction channels so as to attract the most appropriate investment that can best satisfy its own development demands.
     The paper had carried out a comprehensive study of the overseas investment introduction status in China and in Shanxi province in particular with the methodologies of investment ecosystem theories, SWOT analyses, equilibrium analyses theories, complicity analyses and tendency analyses with the help of case studies and surveys. Based upon these comprehensive analyses, policy recommendations were also proposed to better address the existing problems.
     The following breakthroughs were achieved in the study methodologies in this paper.
     (1) The paper for the first time proposed the theory of investment ecology, which was used to explain and hoped to offer some guidance to the overseas investment introduction practices in such inland provinces of China like Shanxi. The paper also pin-pointed the two fundamental principles of the investment ecology theory, that is for the investment the decision making should be focused on the choice of the investment environment and its adaptability to the environment, while for the party that introduce the investment the fundamentals are the improvement of the investment ecological environment and the appropriate choice of potential investments. The equilibrium of the investment ecosystem is the key and utmost insurance to the mutual benefit and win-win objectives of both the investment and the parties that introduce the investments.
     (2)A model illustrating the interactive mechanism among the various factors in the investment ecosystem was initially proposed in the paper.
     (3)A dynamic analysis of the present investment ecological environment in China was carried out in the paper with the help of investment ecology theories, and a case study was also made specifically in regard the investment ecological status in Shanxi province.
     (4) Under the guidance of the investment ecology theories, a series of policy recommendations were proposed to Shanxi province from the point of view of choice of appropriate investment, satisfaction of the demands of the potential investment and improvement of the investment ecological environment. These recommendations may prove to be suggestive and helpful not only to Shanxi, but also the other inland provinces of China.
     (5)The investment ecology theories proposed in the paper covered both the investment activities and the investment attracting activities. For the parties and areas that intend to introduce investment, these theories could be used for decision making not only for attracting overseas investment, but also attracting domestic and private investment. For the parties of investment, these theories of choice of and adaptively to the investment ecological environment may prove to be quite suggestive and helpful, especially for the Chinese enterprises that intend to plan overseas investment projects.
引文
①罗平译.国际收支手册[M].中国金融出版社.1994.第19-20页.
    ②这个一般定义基于OECD《外国直接投资定义的详细标准》第三版(巴黎,OECD,1996年)和IMF《国际收支手册》第五版(华盛顿特区,IMF,1993).UNCTAD:《World Investment Report 2005:Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D》.
    ①鲁明泓.国际直接投资区位决定因素[M].南京:南京大学出版社.2000.第56-60页;[日]原正行.海外直接投资理论[M].暨南大学出版社.1995.第17页
    ②[日]小岛清.对外贸易论[M].天津:南开大学出版社.1987.第97页.
    ①吴先明.现代跨国公司理论的发展趋势[J].经济评论,2000,第1期,第23页.
    ②聂名华.发展中国家对外直接投资理论评述[J].经济动态,2000,第3期,第44-47页.
    ③张志元.国际直接投资新理论介评[J].世界经济研究,1998,第3期,第27-28页.
    ①劳尔·普雷维什.外国资本主义:危机与改造[M].商务印书馆.1990.第46-47页.
    ②刘力.许民.入世后的中国外资政策[M].中国社会出版社.2002.第34-38页.
    ③刘力、许民.入世后的中国外资政策[M].中国社会出版社.2002.第51页.
    ①张雷声.寻求独立、平等与发展—发展中国家社会经济发展理论研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.1998.第55页.
    ②多斯·桑托斯.帝国主义与依附[M].社会科学文献出版社.1992.第77-80页.
    ①列宁.帝国主义是资本主义的最高阶段[M].彼得格勒:1917.第102108页;列宁全集[M].北京:人民出版社.1995.第2版,第22篇,第99-105页.
    ①杨灿英.外商直接投资理论与务实[M].天津:南开大学出版社.2000.第31-32页.
    ①刘力、许民.入世后的中国外资政策[M].中国社会出版社.2002.第7273页.
    ②联合国贸易与发展会议.1992年世界投资报告[M].北京:对外经济贸易教育出版社.1993.第32页
    ①邓小平.邓小平文选.第三卷.北京:人民出版社.1993年版.第228-230页.
    ①联合国贸易与发展会议.1992年世界投资报告[M].北京:对外经济贸易教育出版社.1993.第32页
    ①厉以宁.市场经济大辞典[M].北京:新华出版社,1993.439.
    ②中国百科大辞典(第七卷)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1999.5383
    ③邓宏兵.投资环境评价原理与方法[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2000:30
    ①肖周录、杨向卫.西部地区外商投资环境研究[M].西安:西北工业大学出版社.2008.第18页.
    ①余劲松主编.国际投资法[M].法律出版社.2003.第217页.
    ①梁嘉骅、范建平、李常洪、宫丽华.企业生态与企业发展,企业竞争对策[M].北京:科学出版社.2005.第92-95页.
    ①董超.中国利用外资新趋势[J].中国外资,2008,第12期,第7-10页.
    ①董超.中国利用外资新趋势[J].中国外资,2008,第12期,第7-10页.
    ②江小涓.中国对外开放进入新阶段-更均衡合理地融入全球径济[J].中国工商管理研究,2006,第8期,第16-18页.
    ①竺彩华.FDI外部性与中国产业发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社.2008.第302页.
    ①竺彩华.FDI外部性与中国产业发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社.2008.第302页.
    ①王庆金、马浩、王磊.投资环境评价[M].北京:中国标准出版社.2008.第155页.
    ①孙亚.如何遏制民企“借壳变脸”外资化[J].中国外资,2008,第9期,第23-24页.
    ②真家阳一.奥运会之后中国经济不会衰退的三个理由[J].经济学人,2008,第2期,第12页.
    ①李留澜.走出能源基地和老工业基地创新发展的路子[M]太原:山西人民出版社.2008.第89-93页.
    ①张复明.山西区位角色的嬗变[J].决策咨询,2003,第6期,第12-13页.
    ①《中国中部经济发展报告(2007)》,第35页.
    ①贾志琦.山西省百强企业专利发展现状分析及对策[J].科技情报开发与经济,2009,第2期,第16-17页.
    ①金占明.战略管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2004.,第168页:迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].华夏出版社.1997.第133页.
    ①张建英、杜耀文.山西文化资源的特点与整合[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2006,第10期,第15页.
    ①李留澜.走出能源基地和老工业基地创新发展的路子[M].太原:山西人民出版社.2008.第44页.
    ②山西省发展和改革委员会主任李宝卿在山西省第十一届人民代表大会第二次会议上的报告.
    ①张忠民.双引擎促进战略[J].中国外资.2008,第12期,第21页
    ②江小娟.中国经济的开放与增长(1980-2005年)[M].北京:人民出版社.2007.第27-28页.
    ①陈文敬.中国利用外资三十年回顾[J].中国外资,2009,第1期,第8页.
    ①王淑珍.走出内陆省份对外开放的路子[M].太原:山西人民出版社.2008.第100页.
    ①王淑珍.走出内陆省份对外开放的路子[M].太原:山西人民出版社.2008.第131页.
    ②山西省社会信用体系建设“十一五”规划.
    ①王人博等.法治论[M].济南:山东人民出版社.1998.第118页.
    ①高晋康主编.西部开发投资法制环境论[M].法律出版社.2004.第109页.
    ②李留谰.走出能源基地和老工业基地创新发展的路子[M].太原:山西人民出版社.2008.第101页.
    [1].梁嘉骅,范建平,李常洪,宫丽华.企业生态与企业发展[M].北京,科学出版社,2005,92-95.
    [2].赵国浩编著.企业核心竞争力理论与实务[M].北京,机械工业出版社,2005,127-130.
    [3].马世俊.现代生态学透视[M].北京,科学出版社,1990,8-12.
    [4].(英)坦斯利.大不列颠岛及其植物[M].剑桥,剑桥大学出版社,1939,223-225.
    [5].郑师章,吴千红,王海波,陶芸编著.普通生态学-原理、方法和应用[M].上海,复旦大学出版社,1994,11.
    [6].艾凌宇,梁嘉骅.投资生态与引资问题[J].中国行政管理,2009,5,74-77.
    [7].艾凌宇,林静.中国近几年宏观投资效率研究[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会版),2009,3,80-84.
    [8].江小涓.中国经济的开放与增长(1980-2005年)[M].北京,人民出版社,2007,54-55.
    [9].胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告.中国共产党新闻网,2007,10.
    [10]. 罗平译.国际收支手册[M].北京,中国金融出版社.,1994,19-20.
    [11]. 鲁明泓.国际直接投资区位决定因素[M].南京,南京大学出版社,2000,56-60.
    [12]. 王寿云,于景元,戴汝为.开放的复杂巨系统[M].杭州,浙江科学技术出版社,1996,165-160.
    [13]. [日]原正行.海外直接投资理论[M].广州,暨南大学出版社,1995,17.
    [14]. [日]小岛清.对外贸易论[M].天津,南开大学出版社,1987,97.
    [15]. 吴先明.现代跨国公司理论的发展趋势[J].经济评论,2000,1,23.
    [16]. 聂名华.发展中国家对外直接投资理论评述[J].经济动态,2000,3,44-47.
    [17]. 张志元.国际直接投资新理论介评[J].世界经济研究,1998,3,27-28.
    [18]. 劳尔·普雷维什.外国资本主义:危机与改造[M].北京,商务印书馆,1990,46-47.
    [19]. 刘力、许民.入世后的中国外资政策[M].北京,中国社会出版社,2002,72-73.
    [20]. 张雷声.寻求独立、平等与发展—发展中国家社会经济发展理论研究[M].北京,.中国人民大学出版社,1998,55.
    [21]. 多斯·桑托斯.帝国主义与依附[M].北京,社会科学文献出版社,1992,77-80.
    [22]. 列宁.帝国主义是资本主义的最高阶段[M].北京,人民出版社,1917,102-108.
    [23]. 列宁全集[M].北京,人民出版社,1995,99-105.
    [24]. 杨灿英.外商直接投资理论与务实[M].天津,南开大学出版社,2000,31-32.
    [25]. 联合国贸易与发展会议.1992年世界投资报告[M].北京,对外经济贸易教育出版社,1993,32.
    [26]. 邓小平.邓小平文选.第三卷.北京,人民出版社,1993,228-230.
    [27]. 余劲松主编.国际投资法[M].北京,法律出版社,2003,217.
    [28]. 董超.中国利用外资新趋势[J].中国外资,2008,12,7-10.
    [29]. 江小涓.中国对外开放进入新阶段-更均衡合理地融入全球径济[J].中国工商管理研究,2006,8,16-18.
    [30]. 孙亚.如何遏制民企“借壳变脸”外资化[J].中国外资,2008,9,23-24.
    [31]. 真家阳一.奥运会之后中国经济不会衰退的三个理由[J].经济学人,2008,2,12.
    [32]. 山西省省委书记张宝顺2006年在山西省对外开放大会上的讲话.
    [33]. 贾志琦.山西省百强企业专利发展现状分析及对策[J].科技情报开发与经济,2009,2,16-17.
    [34]. 张建英、杜耀文.山西文化资源的特点与整合[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2006,10,15.
    [35]. 中共中央国务院关于促进中部地区崛起的若干意见.中华人民共和国发展改革委员会网站,2007,4.
    [36]. 山西省发展和改革委员会主任李宝卿在山西省第十一届人民代表大会上的报告.
    [37]. 张忠民.双引擎促进战略[J].中国外资,2008,12,21.
    [38]. 江小娟.中国经济的开放与增长(1980-2005年)[M].北京,人民出版社,2007,27-28.
    [39]. 金占明.战略管理[M].北京,清华大学出版社,2004,168.
    [40]. 山西省煤层气(天然气)产业“十一五”发展规划.
    [41]. 山西装备业“十一五”发展规划.
    [42]. 山西省材料工业“十一五”发展规划.
    [43]. 山西省“十一五”旅游产业总体发展规划.
    [44]. 山西省农业发展“十一五”规划.
    [45]. 山西省服务业“十一五”时期发展大纲.
    [46]. 山西省“十一五”综合公路网建设规划.
    [47]. 山西省环境保护“十一五”规划.
    [48]. 山西省社会信用体系建设“十一五”规划.
    [49]. 朱日祥.让科教成为山西发展的引擎[J].山西日报,2006,3(26)B2.
    [50]. 王人博等.法治论[M].济南,山东人民出版社,1998,118.
    [51]. 高晋康主编.西部开发投资法制环境论[M].北京,法律出版社,2004,109.
    [52]. 张久琴.进出口经理人[J].中国外资,2007,(3、4),14-16.
    [53]. 王庆金,马浩,王磊编著.投资环境评价[M].北京,中国标准出版社,2008,155.
    [54]. 桑百川.外资控股并购国有企业问题研究[M].北京,人民出版社,2005,227.
    [55]. 竺彩华著.FDI外部性与中国产业发展[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2008,302.
    [56]. 南昌大学中国中西部经济发展研究中心.2007中国中部经济发展报告[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2007,35.
    [57]. 杨先明等著.中西部外资问题研究[M].北京,人民出版社,2008,131-134.
    [58]. 肖周录,杨向卫.西部地区外商投资环境研究[M].西安,西北工业大学出版社,2008,18.
    [59]. 厉以宁.市场经济大辞典[M].北京,新华出版社,1999,439.
    [60]. 中国百科大辞典(第七卷)[M].北京,中国大百科全书出版社,1999,5383.
    [61]. 山西省对外开放“十一五”规划.
    [62]. 山西省商务发展“十一五”规划.
    [63]. 段建国主编.走出资源性地区可持续发展的路子[M].太原,山西人民出版社,2008,303-310.
    [64]. 王淑珍主编.走出内陆省份对外开放的路子[M].太原,山西人民出版社,2008,131.
    [65]. 李留澜主编.走出能源基地和老工业基地创新发展的路子[M].太原,山西人民出版社,2008,89-93.
    [66]. 杨大凯.中国投资发展报告[R].上海,2005中国投资发展报告-中国投资环境评价,2005,64-68.
    [67]. 梁嘉骅,葛振忠,范建平.企业生态与企业发展[J].管理科学学报,2002,2,34-40.
    [68]. 梁嘉骅,范建平.信息社会与企业管理的变革[J].科技导报,2002,1,59-61
    [69]. 范建平,梁嘉骅.企业生态系统及其复杂性探讨[J].科技与管理,2002,3,13-17.
    [70]. 梁嘉骅,柳青艳.经济全球化下发展中国家企业发展生态[J].科技与管理,2002,1:1-6.
    [71]. 梁嘉骅,仝岩林.企业再造成功与失败的生态再思考[J].决策借鉴,2002,6,16-21.
    [72]. 张敦富.投资环境评价与投资决策[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,1999,223-227.
    [73]. (美)黄亚生著,钱勇,王润亮译.改革时期的外国直接投资[M].北京,新星出版社,2005,56-57.
    [74]. 李新家.跨国公司在华筹供策略[M].北京,中国财政经济出版社,2005,182-185.
    [75]. 孙建中,吕小康.国际经济合作导论[M].北京,经济科学出版社,1999,78.
    [76]. 兰宜生.中国对外开放与地区经济发展[M].上海,上海社会科学院出版社,2006,215-217.
    [77]. 曹洪军.外资并购与中国外资政策调整研究[M].北京,人民出版社,2005,117-120.
    [78]. 魏后凯,贺灿飞,王新.中国外商投资区位决策与公共政策[M].北京,商务印书馆,2002,121-125.
    [79]. 唐宜红.外资进入行为研究—兼析外资政策及其引资效应[M].北京,人民出版社,2003,295-297.
    [80]. 冯子标,焦斌龙.大趋势:文化产业解构传统产业[M].北京,社会科学文献出版社,2006,206-208.
    [81]. 冯子标,焦斌龙.分工、比较优势与文化产业发展[M].北京,商务印书馆, 2005,187.
    [82]. 林毅夫、蔡肪、李周.资源结构升级:赶超战略的误区[J].战略与管理,1996,5,67-68.
    [83]. 李清均.后发优势:中国欠发达地区发展转型研究[M].北京,经济管理出版社,2000,326-330.
    [84]. 李规正、段福德等.合资留给我们什么?中外企业合资十大败局分析[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2005,136-140.
    [85]. 肖显静.生态政治:面对环境问题的国家抉择[M].太原,山西科学技术出版社,2003,273-276.
    [86]. 李镇西.魂系山西[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,1995,213-220.
    [87]. 当代中国的山西[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,1991,163-165.
    [88]. 滕家国.外商对华直接投资研究[M].武汉,武汉大学出版社,2001,145-147.
    [89]. 张岩贵,刘晨阳.APEC成员外商投资制度及其比较[M].天津,南开大学出版社,2005,235-236.
    [90]. 成思危.复杂科学与系统工程[J].管理科学学报,1999,2(2),1-7.
    [91]. 成思危.复杂科学与管理[J].中国科学院院刊,1999,3,176-184.
    [92]. 刘和平,魏一鸣,范英,徐伟宣.复杂性科学及其在经济领域中的应用[J].中国管理科学,2000,1,22-23.
    [93]. 成思危.中国管理科学的学科结构与发展重点选择[J].管理科学学报,2000,3(1),1-6.
    [94]. 席酉民.新世纪:中国管理科学界的挑战、机遇与对策[J].管理科学学报,2000,3(1),7-14.
    [95]. 周晖,彭星闾.企业生命模型初探[J].中国软科学,2000,10,110-115.
    [96]. 陆玲.企业群落与企业群落学[J].生态科学,2001,1(2),162-164.
    [97]. 杨永福,黄大庆,李必强.复杂性科学与管理理论[J].管理世界,2001,2,167-174.
    [98]. 张维迎.企业理论与中国企业改革[M].北京,北京大学出版社,2003,113-117.
    [99]. 迈克尔·波特,陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].北京,华夏出版社,2005,133.
    [100].彼得.德鲁克著,许斌译.管理的前沿[M].上海,上海译文出版社,1997,14-17.
    [101].丹尼尔.A.雷恩著,孔令济译.管理思想的演变[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2000,45-48.
    [102].哈默,普拉哈拉德著,王振西译.竞争大未来[M].北京,昆仑出版社,998,46-50.
    [103].克劳斯·曼因策尔著,曾国平译.复杂性中的思维[M].北京,中央编译出版社,1999,74-77.
    [104].亚当·斯密著,郭大力,王亚南译.国富论[M].北京,商务印书馆,1987,235-242.
    [105].达尔文著,周建人,叶笃庄,方宗熙译.物种起源[M].北京,商务印书馆,2002,216-221.
    [106].王寿云,于景元,戴汝为.开放的复杂巨系统[M].杭州,浙江科学技术出版社,1996,137-140.
    [107].何祚庥,张焘.复杂性研究[M].北京,科学出版社,1993,73-74.
    [108].彼得·杜拉克著,彭志华译.创新与企业家精神[M].海口,海南出版社,2000,241-243.
    [109].阿尔温·托夫勒著,朱志焱,潘琪,张焱译.第三次浪潮[M].北京,中信出版社,1984,215-218.
    [110].赖纳·特茨拉夫著,吴志成,韦苏,陈宗显译.全球化压力下的世界文化[M].南昌,江西人民出版社,2001,91-92.
    [111].拜瑞·J·内勒巴夫,亚当·M·布兰登勃格著,王煜全,王煜昆译.合作竞争[M].合肥,安徽人民出版社,2000,162-164.
    [112].科斯等,制度、契约与组织——从新制度经济学角度的透视[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2003,103-105.
    [113].王铁军编著.中国地方政府融资22种模式[M].北京,中国金融出版社,2006,168-173.
    [114].王梦奎主编.中国中长期发展的重要问题2006-2020[M].北京,中国发展出版社,2005,304-310.
    [115].胡荣水,王胜旗等编著.海外融资实务[M].北京,中国发展出版社,1998,301-305.
    [116].张维迎主编.中国改革30年—10位经济学家的思考[M].上海,上海人民出版社,2008,114-116.
    [117].金勇进主编.数字中国[M].北京,人民出版社,2008,101-107.
    [118].山西省委政策研究室编著.山西改革开放30年[M].太原,北岳文艺出版社,2008,210-214.
    [119].李高山主编.走出欠发达地区构建和谐社会的路子[M].太原,山西人民出版社,2008,247-251.
    [120].注册咨询工程师(投资)考试教材编写委员会编.项目决策分析与评价[M].北京,中国计划出版社,2003,224-226.
    [121].孙丽萍,高春平.晋商研究新论[M].太原,山西人民出版社,2005,165.
    [122].金占明.战略管理-超竞争环境下的选择[M].北京,清华大学出版社,2004,218-220.
    [123].苏旭霞.国际直接投资自由化与中国外资政策[M].北京,中国商务出版社,2004,124-126.
    [124].杨聪,杨建睿,毛乐燕.西部投资环境研究[M].北京,民族出版社,2007,78.
    [125]. (美)保罗·克鲁格曼著,刘波译.美国怎么了?一个自由主义者的良知[M].北京,中信出版社,2008,265-279.
    [126].马立诚.交锋三十年-改革开放四次大争论亲历记[M].南京,江苏人民出版社,2008,69-75.
    [127]. (德)马克斯·奥特著,何梦舒等译.崩溃已经来临[M].天津,天津教育出版社,2009,261-270.
    [128].中南大学中国中部崛起发展战略研究中心.中部崛起科技发展战略研究[M].北京,中国经济出版社,2007,431-442.
    [129].刘向东.对外开放启起始录[M].北京,经济管理出版社,2008,372-386.
    [130].孙坚中.资本国际化运营[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2000,244-252.
    [131].王志乐.2006跨国公司中国报告[R].北京,中国经济出版社,2006,86-93.
    [132].胡荣水,王胜旗.海外融资务实[M].北京,中国发展出版社,1998,54-59.
    [133].邓宏兵,李俊杰.中国外商投资环境竞争力研究[J].国际贸易问题,2007,(7),30-33.
    [134].邓宏兵.投资环境评价原理与方法[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,2000,30.
    [135].潘霞,范德成.区域投资环境的评价研究—以中国内地31个省、市、区为例 [J].经济问题探索,2007,2(8),112-115.
    [136].中华人民共和国商务部.2006国别贸易投资报告[R].北京,人民出版社,2006(4),402-416.
    [137].张宝柱,殷焕武.中国投资环境现状分析与对策研究[J].经济师,2006,2(2),42-44.
    [138].倪鹏飞,中国城市竞争力报告[M].北京,社会科学文献出版社,2008,162-165.
    [139].王人博等著.法治论[M].济南,山东人民出版社,1998,268.
    [140].高晋康主编.西部开发投资法制环境论[M].北京,法律出版社,2004,83-89.
    [141].赵维田著.中国入世议定书条款解读[M].长沙,湖南科技出版社,2006,369-372.
    [142].中西部地区外商投资优势产业目录(2008年修订)
    [143].王文先主编.WTO规则与案例[M].北京,清华大学出版社,2007,156-162.
    [144].韩彩珍著.中国外资政策和法律的绩效分析.北京,中国经济出版社,2007,203-214.
    [145].杨先明.发展阶段与国际直接投资[M].北京,商务印书馆,2000,95-107.
    [146].周春应、王波.外商直接投资与中国经济发展的长期均衡与动态分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2006,3,19-20.
    [147].倪海青、张岩贵.我国人力资本水平与FDI相互关系的实证研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2006,12,27-28.
    [148].汪斌.国际区域产业结构分析导论[M].上海,上海人民出版社,2001,106-113.
    [149].薛求知、任胜钢.跨国公司理论新进展:基于区位与集群的视角[J].复旦学报,2005,1,33-34.
    [150].赵晋平.利用外资和中国经济增长[M].北京,人民出版社,2001,138-143.
    [151].王福新、蒋瑞直.中国利用外资与经济发展关联度分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1998,5,22-23.
    [152].江小涓等.我国外商投资梯度转移问题研究[J].中国工业经济,2004,11,32.
    [153].克鲁格曼.克鲁格曼国际贸易新理论[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2001,67-72.
    [154].刘秀玲.国际直接投资与技术转移[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2003,232-241.
    [155].吴海林等.跨国公司对华技术转移论[M].北京,经济管理出版社,2002,161-169.
    [156].阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.工业区位论[M].北京,商务印书馆,1997,208-214.
    [157].汪旭辉.外商对华直接投资的区位变迁及影响因素分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006,4,35.
    [158].侯景新、尹卫红.区域经济分析方法[M].北京,商务印书馆,2004,362-370.
    [159].陈波.FDI与中国对外贸易的实证分析[J].财经论丛,2006,1,5-16.
    [160].张谊浩、王胜英.国际贸易与对外直接投资相互关系的实证分析—基于我国数据的Granger非因果检验[J].国际贸易问题,2004,1,7-8.
    [161].李惠中、黄平.中国FDI净流入与贸易条件恶化:悖论及解释[J].国际经济评论,2006,3,12-13.
    [162].黄小玲.外国直接投资与对外贸易的相互关系及其对工业化演进的影响—理论部分析与对中国的实证考察[J].财贸经济,2001,9,23-24.
    [163].刘舜佳.外商直接投资与我国出口商品结构优化[J].财经科学,2004,2,6-8.
    [164].杨先明、付润明.国际直接投资与我国产业升级问题的思考[J].云南大学学报,2002,2,13-15.
    [165].高燕.产业升级的测定及制约因素分析[J].统计研究,2006,4,32-33.
    [166].赵果庆.跨国公司对我国工业化升级的影响[J].国际贸易问题,2006,8,16.
    [167].魏后凯、贺灿飞、王新.外商投资区位研究的理论前沿及最新进展[J].上海行政学院学报,2001,4,26-27.
    [168].魏后凯等.外商在华直接投资动机与区位因素分析[J].经济研究,2001,2,19.
    [169].江小涓、杜玲.跨国投资理论研究的最新进展[J].经济世界,2001,6,16-17.
    [170].王增涛.对外直接投资区位选择的分析框架及启示[J].国际金融研究,2002,3,45-46.
    [171].刘荣添.我国东、中、西部外商直接投资(FDI)区位差异因素的Panel Data分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,7,28-30.
    [172].姜国杰.世界外国直接投资的特点及区位因素分析[J].国际贸易问题,2002,7,41-43.
    [173].奥古斯特·勒斯.经济空间秩序:经济财贸与地理间的关系[M].北京,商务印书馆,1995.110-123.
    [174].道格拉斯·诺思、罗伯特·托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京,华夏出版社,1989,93-105.
    [175].鲁明泓.制度因素与国际直接投资分布:一项实证研究[J].经济研究,1999,7,29-30.
    [176].拉坦.诱惑性制度变迁理论[M].上海,上海三联书店,1978,245-261.
    [177].潘镇、潘持春。制度、政策与外国投资的区位分布[J].南京师大学报,2004,3,24-25.
    [178].汪丁丁.论制度创新的一般理论[J].经济研究,1992,5,32-35.
    [179].魏尚进.不透明性的经济成本:外国直接投资损失及额外经营成本[J].经济研究,2001,1(1),18-21.
    [180].赵放.论技术和制度的关系及其在经济增长中的作用[J].当代经济研究,2003,1,31-34.
    [181]. A. J. Glass. Kamal Saggi. International Technology Transfer and Technology Gap [J]. ournal of Development Economics,1998(55):369-398.
    [182]. Agodo, O.. The Determinants of US Private Manufacturing Investment in Africa J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1978,9(3):95-107.
    [183]. Alcacer, J.. the Human Capital in Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries[J]. The Journal of Developing Areas.2000(28):167-190.
    [184]. Alcacer, J. The Human Capital in Foreign Investment[M]. Transition,2000, May-August.
    [185]. Amirahmadi, Hooshang & Weiping wu. Foreign Direct Investment Developing Countries[J]. The Journal of Developing Areas,1994(28):167-190.
    [186]. Archanun Kohpaiboom. Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillover:A Cross-Industry Analysis of Thai Manufacturing[J]. World Development,2006,34(3): 541-556
    [187]. Bartlett C, and Ghoshal S. Managing Across Borders, The Transnational Solution [M].Boston:Harvard Business School press.1998.pp:124.
    [188]. Beata K. Smarzynska. Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment through Backward Linkages:Does Technology Gap Matter? [J]. Preliminary Comments Welcome, Julyl,2002.
    [189]. Blomstrom and H. Person. Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy:Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry [J]. World Development,1983(11):493-501.
    [190]. Blomstrom, M. and Kokko,A.. FDI and Human Capital:a Research Agenda. OECD Technical papers,2002,No.195.
    [191]. Buckley, Peter J, and Casson, Mark C. Models of the Multinational Enterprise [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1998,29(1):21-24.
    [192]. Buckley, Peter J, and Casson, Mark C. The Future of the Multinational enterprise [M].London:Macmillan.1976:167-172.
    [193]. Charles P. Kindleberger. Amercian Business Abroad:Six Essays on Direct Investment[M].Yale University Press. New Haver,1964:102-103.
    [194]. Chenery. and Stout. Foreign Assistance and Economic Develop Development[J]. e American Economics Review.1996,56(4):9-733.
    [195]. Gao J X. Theory and Method of Eco-Environmental Management in New Century. Environmental Protection,2002,(7):9-14.
    [196]. Cimoli, M.. Technological Gaps and Institutional Asymmetries in a North-South Model with a Continuum of Goods",Metroeconomica.1988,(39):245-274.
    [197]. Cimoli, M. and Soete, L.. A Generalized Technological Gap Trade Model [J]. Economie Applique,1992,45(3):33-54.
    [198]. Helpman, E.. simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations [J]. ournal of Political Economy.1984,92(6):451-471.
    [199]. Hymer, S.The International Operations of National Firms:A Study of Direct Investment [M]. Gambridge, MIT press.1976:260-264.
    [200]. John H. Dunning. "the Determinants of International Production"[J]. Oxford Economic Papers.1973,25(3):289-336.
    [201]. John H. Dunning. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, George Allen and Unwin [M].London.1981:109-142.
    [202]. John H. Dunning. Japanese Participation in British Industry[M]. London:Croom Helm.1986
    [203]. John H. Dunning. Explaining and International Production[M]. Boston:Unwin Hyman.1988
    [204]. John H. Dunnin. Location and Multinational Enterprise:a Neglected Factor[J]. Journal of International Business Studies.1988,29:45-67.
    [205]. John H. Dunning. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy[M]. New York:Addison-Wesley Publishing Ltd.1993
    [206]. John H. Dunning. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy[M]. NEW YORK:Addison-Wesley Publishing Ltd.1992
    [207]. John H. Dunning. The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity [J]. International Business Review,2000,9: 163-190.
    [208]. Jun,K.W. and H. Singh.. the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment:New Empirical Evidence [J]. Transnational Corporations,1996,5(3):67-105.
    [209]. Kojima, Kiyoshi. A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment[J]. Hitotsmbash Journal of Economics, June 1973:156-187.
    [210]. Krugman, Paul.. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and Inter-national Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics,1979,9:469-479.
    [211]. Peter J. Buckley and Mark C.Casson. The Future of Multinational Enterprise[M]. Macmillan, London, pp.80-83,1976.
    [212]. Raymond. Vernon. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1996,80:190-207,
    [213]. Romer,PM. Endogenous Technology Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(5).
    [214]. Rugman, A.M. New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise:An Assessment of Internalisation Theory[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research,1986.:23-56.
    [215]. Rugman, Alan M, Verbeke, Alain. Extending the Theory of the multinational enterprise:Internalization and Strategic Management Perspectives[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(2):125.
    [216]. UNCTAD. World Investment Report [M]. New York:UN.1998
    [217]. V. N. Balasubramanyam, M.Salisu and D. Sapsford. oreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries [J]. Economic Journal,1996,1:106.
    [218]. Vernon, R.. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle [J]. Quarterly Journal of International Economics,1996,80:190-207.
    [219]. Vernon, Raymond. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics 41, May 1966:191-207.
    [220]. Veuglers, R..Locational Determinants and Ranking of Host Countries. Kykals,1991,44:3-382.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700