大庆长垣以东地区扶余油层高分辨率层序地层学和油气富集规律研究
|
摘要
大庆油田是我国最为重要的油气生产基地,然而经历了近五十年的勘探开发,大庆油田已进入油气田勘探与开发的中后期阶段,目前正面临着储采失衡、资源接替不足的严峻局面,而大庆长垣以东地区扶余油层具有较大的勘探潜力,是大庆油田精细勘探和近期提交石油储量的主战场。因此,在大庆长垣以东地区开展精细的高分辨率层序地层学及沉积相研究,总结该地区油气富集规律对该区下一步油气勘探、开发具有重要的指导作用和借鉴价值。
本论文以沉积学、高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导,综合应用地震资料、钻/测井资料、岩心资料以及室内分析化验资料,对大庆长垣以东地区扶余油层进行了系统深入的高分辨率层序地层学研究,并以高分辨率层序地层格架内的沉积微相与砂体分布规律研究及研究区扶余油层各种成藏地质要素分析为基础,从多因素地质条件及其时空匹配关系的角度出发,确定油气成藏过程中各阶段的主控因素,建立扶余油层油气成藏模式,总结研究区扶余油层的油气富集规律,进而对研究区扶余油层油气成藏有利目标区带进行预测。取得的成果与认识如下:
(1)依据高分辨率层序地层学理论及技术方法,首次建立了研究区扶余油层以短期基准面旋回为基本单元的高分辨率层序地层格架,并总结了短、中期基准面旋回类型及短期基准面旋回层序分布模式。研究区扶余油层可划分为2个长期基准面旋回,6个中期基准面旋回,26个短期基准面旋回层序;在短期基准面旋回层序的结构类型剖析基础之上,结合研究区扶余油层沉积时期特殊的多物源汇聚的浅水湖泊三角洲沉积环境,总结了研究区扶余油层不同沉积相带短期基准面旋回结构变化与对比关系模式。
(2)通过重矿物组合特征和ZTR指数变化特征研究,结合研究区岩石结构特征与砂岩展布特征,对研究区泉头组三、四段沉积时期的物源方向和物源体系进行了分析,并对不同时期各物源体系在研究区内的主要控制范围进行厘定,认为研究区扶余油层沉积时期主要受6个物源体系控制,以南、北两大物源体系为主,各物源体系在不同时期影响范围有所变化。
(3)通过岩芯观察、描述和大量的钻测井资料,系统分析了研究区扶余油层的岩石相和测井相模式,建立了反映不同沉积作用和沉积环境的岩—电响应关系。
(4)在岩石相和测井相模式及岩—电响应关系建立的基础上,对研究区扶余油层的沉积微相类型、特点进行了深入研究,认为研究区扶余油层以发育独具特色的浅水湖泊—三角洲体系为特征,主要发育浅水湖泊三角洲相和浅水湖泊相,并结合以各中期基准面半旋回为单元的沉积微相平面分布规律研究,总结了研究区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲体系的沉积模式,并对高分辨率层序地层格架控制下的储层砂体分布特征进行了分析。
(5)应用化学动力学模型对研究区青一段烃源岩的生排烃期及生排烃量进行研究,结果表明,研究区青一段烃源岩在上白垩统嫩江组末期至四方台组沉积初期开始生烃,在明水组沉积末期开始达到生烃高峰期;青一段烃源岩生排烃量集中分布在二级构造带三肇凹陷中东部、朝阳沟阶地以及研究区外的王府凹陷内,生排油中心基本上分布在三肇凹陷中心部位,而朝阳沟地区也具有一定的生排油能力,这与前人对本地区研究的认识有所不同。
(6)通过朝阳沟地区扶余油层油源对比表明,朝阳沟地区青一段烃源岩属于成熟型烃源岩,朝阳沟地区扶余油层的油源主要有两个:三肇凹陷青一段烃源岩和朝阳沟本地区青一段烃源岩,且二者对扶余油层的贡献量可能基本相同,这与生排烃史研究的结论相一致,证实朝阳沟地区青一段源岩具有生排油能力及生排烃史研究的准确性。
(7)以研究区扶余油层油气成藏地质条件分析为基础,将油气成藏过程划分为油气生成排出、油气“倒灌”运移、油气侧向运移和油气聚集四个阶段,并从多因素地质条件及其时空匹配关系的角度出发,分别确定油气成藏过程各阶段的主控因素。分析结果显示,烃源岩有效排油范围控制扶余油层油气来源以及源内、源外区油气运移方式与聚集条件的差异;青一段源岩有效排烃范围、超压和T2反射层油源断裂组合关系控制油气向下“倒灌”运移的范围、距离及层位;古构造背景、T2断层走向与储层砂体展布方向配置关系控制油气侧向运移的方向、通道和距离;基准面旋回、沉积微相类型与现今构造格局配置关系控制着油气聚集的垂向及平面规律。
(8)结合油气成藏地质过程各个阶段主控因素分析、构造发育史、油源条件及沉积微相等研究成果,将研究区扶余油层油气成藏模式概括为以下4种类型:源内-顶生下储式油气成藏模式;近源-短距离侧向运移-斜坡带断层遮挡油气成藏模式;源外-长距离侧向运移-继承性构造隆起带油气成藏模式;多源-多方式侧向运移油气成藏模式。
(9)综合各方面研究成果,在研究区扶余油层中划分出3大类6亚类油气成藏区带,并优选出2个有利目标区、4个有利目标圈闭。
Daqing oilfield is the most important oil and gas production base in China, however, after a nearly five decades of exploration and development, Daqing Oilfield has entered the later stage of oil and gas exploration and development, currently facing a grave situation of reserve-production imbalances and lack of succeeding resources. However, Fuyu oil bed in Daqing placanticline and its east area has great exploration potential, which is a fine exploration main battlefield of Daqing oilfield that can submit oil reserves recently. Therefore, carrying out research on fine high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies, as well as summarizing oil and gas accumulation pattern in this area have great guiding function and reference value for further oil and gas exploration and development in this area.
Guided by the theory of sedimentology and high resolution sequence stratigraphy , based on the seismic, logging, drill core, laboratory analysis and test data, this paper made a systematical and in-depth research on high resolution sequence stratigraphy of Fuyu oil bed in Daqing placanticline and its east area. Based on the study of sedimentary micro-facies, sandstone distribution restricted by the framework of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, and based on the analysis of reservoir formed factors of Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, in view of multiple geologic features and their matching relationship between spatial and temporal, the master control factors in reservoir forming stage were confirmed, the mode of hydrocarbon accumulation of Fuyu oil bed were established and the hydrocarbon enrichment pattern of Fuyu oil bed were summarized, and then the favorable oil and gas accumulation zones in the studied area are predicted. Innovation and acquaintance acquired from above study were as follows.
(1) According to the theory and technology of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, a high resolution sequence stratigraphy framework using short-term datum level as a basic unit was first constructed in Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, and the distribution mode of short, mid-term and short-term datum level were summarized. Fuyu oil bed in studied area were divided into two long-term datum levels, six mid-term datum levels and twenty six short-term datum levels. Based on the structural analysis of short-term datum levels, combined the special multi-source accumulation shallow lake-delta sedimentary environment during the deposition period of Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, the structure changes and comparison relationship mode of short-term datum level in different sedimentary phases of Fuyu oil bed were summarized.
(2) According to the study of heavy mineral compose and ZTR index character, combined with the rock texture and sandstone distribution character, analysed the orientation and system of source, confirmed the master control range of each source systerm in different periods of the 3th and 4th of Quantou segment.Accounted that the studied area during the deposition of the Fuyu oil bed was mainly controlled by six source system, the north and south source are major and the influence area of every source at different periods were different.
(3) Based on the observation and description of core and a great quantity of logging data, the rock phase and electrofacies were systematically analysised, the rock-electricity response mode which reflects the different sedimentation effect and sedimentary environment was established.
(4) Based on rock phase, electrofacies and rock-electricity response mode, the types and the character of sedimentary micro-facies were in-depth studied, accounted that the Fuyu oil layer in the studied area was characterized by the unique shallow lake-delta system, which mainly developed shallow lake-delta and shallow lake. Summarized the shallow lake-delta system depositional model of FuYu oil bed in the studied area combined with the research on the plane sedimentary micro-facies distribution of semi-cycle of mid-term datum level, and the distribution characteristic of reservoir sandstones is analyzed under the control of high resolution sequence stratigraphic framework.
(5) According to the principle of chemical kinetics, amount and period of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion were studied to the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation in the studied area, the result showed that the hydrocarbon generation period of the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation was begun at the last stage of Nenjiang formation to the beginning of Sifangtai formation in Upper Crataceous, hydrocarbon generation reached to the top at the last stage of Mingshui formation. Hydrocarbon generation amount of the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation was mainly in middle-east area of Sanzhao depression, Chaoyanggou terrace and Wangfu sag which is outside the studied area. Hydrocarbon generation centre was essentially distributed in the middle area of Sanzhao depression, but Chaoyanggou terrace also had the hydrocarbon generation capacity, which is different from the predecessors’awareness of the studies on this region.
(6) The oil-source correlation of Fuyu oil bed shows that the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Chaoyanggou region are mature source rocks, and there are two oil-sources of Fuyu oil bed in Chaoyanggou region: the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Sanzhao depression and the source rocks in Chaoyanggou region. The contribution of the two oil-sources to Fuyu oil bed may be same, which is consisted with the conclusion of the study on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history, and can confirm that the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Chaoyanggou region has the oil generation and expulsion capability, as well as the accuracy of the study on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history.
(7) Based on the analysis of reservoir forming geologic conditions of Fuyu oil bed, the process of hydrocarbon forming was divided into four stages: hydrocarbon generation and expulsion, downward migration, parallel migration, and hydrocarbon accumulation. From the perspective of multi-factors geologic conditions and their matching relationship between spatial and temporal, confirmed the master control features of each estate in the hydrocarbon formed process. The result showed that the bound, distance and layer of hydrocarbon migrated downward were controlled by effective expulsion range of K1qn1 source rock, overpressure and T2 fault assemblage. The direction, pathway and distance of oil parallel migrated were controlled by palaeostructure and the relationship between T2 fault and reservoir. The oil and gas distribution in vertical and planar were controlled by cycle of base level, sedimentary microfacies and current tectonic.
(8) Combine with the results of the research on master control factors of every estate in the process of hydrocarbon accumulation, structural history, oil sources conditions and sedimentary micro-facies of research area, the hydrocarbon formed pattern was summarized to four types, they were, Inside source-upper source rock-lower reservoir model, Near source-short distance lateral migration-fault screened in slope zone model, Outside source-long distance lateral migration-inherited tectonic uplift zone model and Multi-source-Multi-lateral migration model.
(9) After summing up all the research results, there categories and six sub-categories reservoir forming zones are divided out in Fuyu oil bed, two favorable target areas and four favorable target traps are optimized.
本论文以沉积学、高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导,综合应用地震资料、钻/测井资料、岩心资料以及室内分析化验资料,对大庆长垣以东地区扶余油层进行了系统深入的高分辨率层序地层学研究,并以高分辨率层序地层格架内的沉积微相与砂体分布规律研究及研究区扶余油层各种成藏地质要素分析为基础,从多因素地质条件及其时空匹配关系的角度出发,确定油气成藏过程中各阶段的主控因素,建立扶余油层油气成藏模式,总结研究区扶余油层的油气富集规律,进而对研究区扶余油层油气成藏有利目标区带进行预测。取得的成果与认识如下:
(1)依据高分辨率层序地层学理论及技术方法,首次建立了研究区扶余油层以短期基准面旋回为基本单元的高分辨率层序地层格架,并总结了短、中期基准面旋回类型及短期基准面旋回层序分布模式。研究区扶余油层可划分为2个长期基准面旋回,6个中期基准面旋回,26个短期基准面旋回层序;在短期基准面旋回层序的结构类型剖析基础之上,结合研究区扶余油层沉积时期特殊的多物源汇聚的浅水湖泊三角洲沉积环境,总结了研究区扶余油层不同沉积相带短期基准面旋回结构变化与对比关系模式。
(2)通过重矿物组合特征和ZTR指数变化特征研究,结合研究区岩石结构特征与砂岩展布特征,对研究区泉头组三、四段沉积时期的物源方向和物源体系进行了分析,并对不同时期各物源体系在研究区内的主要控制范围进行厘定,认为研究区扶余油层沉积时期主要受6个物源体系控制,以南、北两大物源体系为主,各物源体系在不同时期影响范围有所变化。
(3)通过岩芯观察、描述和大量的钻测井资料,系统分析了研究区扶余油层的岩石相和测井相模式,建立了反映不同沉积作用和沉积环境的岩—电响应关系。
(4)在岩石相和测井相模式及岩—电响应关系建立的基础上,对研究区扶余油层的沉积微相类型、特点进行了深入研究,认为研究区扶余油层以发育独具特色的浅水湖泊—三角洲体系为特征,主要发育浅水湖泊三角洲相和浅水湖泊相,并结合以各中期基准面半旋回为单元的沉积微相平面分布规律研究,总结了研究区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲体系的沉积模式,并对高分辨率层序地层格架控制下的储层砂体分布特征进行了分析。
(5)应用化学动力学模型对研究区青一段烃源岩的生排烃期及生排烃量进行研究,结果表明,研究区青一段烃源岩在上白垩统嫩江组末期至四方台组沉积初期开始生烃,在明水组沉积末期开始达到生烃高峰期;青一段烃源岩生排烃量集中分布在二级构造带三肇凹陷中东部、朝阳沟阶地以及研究区外的王府凹陷内,生排油中心基本上分布在三肇凹陷中心部位,而朝阳沟地区也具有一定的生排油能力,这与前人对本地区研究的认识有所不同。
(6)通过朝阳沟地区扶余油层油源对比表明,朝阳沟地区青一段烃源岩属于成熟型烃源岩,朝阳沟地区扶余油层的油源主要有两个:三肇凹陷青一段烃源岩和朝阳沟本地区青一段烃源岩,且二者对扶余油层的贡献量可能基本相同,这与生排烃史研究的结论相一致,证实朝阳沟地区青一段源岩具有生排油能力及生排烃史研究的准确性。
(7)以研究区扶余油层油气成藏地质条件分析为基础,将油气成藏过程划分为油气生成排出、油气“倒灌”运移、油气侧向运移和油气聚集四个阶段,并从多因素地质条件及其时空匹配关系的角度出发,分别确定油气成藏过程各阶段的主控因素。分析结果显示,烃源岩有效排油范围控制扶余油层油气来源以及源内、源外区油气运移方式与聚集条件的差异;青一段源岩有效排烃范围、超压和T2反射层油源断裂组合关系控制油气向下“倒灌”运移的范围、距离及层位;古构造背景、T2断层走向与储层砂体展布方向配置关系控制油气侧向运移的方向、通道和距离;基准面旋回、沉积微相类型与现今构造格局配置关系控制着油气聚集的垂向及平面规律。
(8)结合油气成藏地质过程各个阶段主控因素分析、构造发育史、油源条件及沉积微相等研究成果,将研究区扶余油层油气成藏模式概括为以下4种类型:源内-顶生下储式油气成藏模式;近源-短距离侧向运移-斜坡带断层遮挡油气成藏模式;源外-长距离侧向运移-继承性构造隆起带油气成藏模式;多源-多方式侧向运移油气成藏模式。
(9)综合各方面研究成果,在研究区扶余油层中划分出3大类6亚类油气成藏区带,并优选出2个有利目标区、4个有利目标圈闭。
Daqing oilfield is the most important oil and gas production base in China, however, after a nearly five decades of exploration and development, Daqing Oilfield has entered the later stage of oil and gas exploration and development, currently facing a grave situation of reserve-production imbalances and lack of succeeding resources. However, Fuyu oil bed in Daqing placanticline and its east area has great exploration potential, which is a fine exploration main battlefield of Daqing oilfield that can submit oil reserves recently. Therefore, carrying out research on fine high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies, as well as summarizing oil and gas accumulation pattern in this area have great guiding function and reference value for further oil and gas exploration and development in this area.
Guided by the theory of sedimentology and high resolution sequence stratigraphy , based on the seismic, logging, drill core, laboratory analysis and test data, this paper made a systematical and in-depth research on high resolution sequence stratigraphy of Fuyu oil bed in Daqing placanticline and its east area. Based on the study of sedimentary micro-facies, sandstone distribution restricted by the framework of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, and based on the analysis of reservoir formed factors of Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, in view of multiple geologic features and their matching relationship between spatial and temporal, the master control factors in reservoir forming stage were confirmed, the mode of hydrocarbon accumulation of Fuyu oil bed were established and the hydrocarbon enrichment pattern of Fuyu oil bed were summarized, and then the favorable oil and gas accumulation zones in the studied area are predicted. Innovation and acquaintance acquired from above study were as follows.
(1) According to the theory and technology of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, a high resolution sequence stratigraphy framework using short-term datum level as a basic unit was first constructed in Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, and the distribution mode of short, mid-term and short-term datum level were summarized. Fuyu oil bed in studied area were divided into two long-term datum levels, six mid-term datum levels and twenty six short-term datum levels. Based on the structural analysis of short-term datum levels, combined the special multi-source accumulation shallow lake-delta sedimentary environment during the deposition period of Fuyu oil bed in the studied area, the structure changes and comparison relationship mode of short-term datum level in different sedimentary phases of Fuyu oil bed were summarized.
(2) According to the study of heavy mineral compose and ZTR index character, combined with the rock texture and sandstone distribution character, analysed the orientation and system of source, confirmed the master control range of each source systerm in different periods of the 3th and 4th of Quantou segment.Accounted that the studied area during the deposition of the Fuyu oil bed was mainly controlled by six source system, the north and south source are major and the influence area of every source at different periods were different.
(3) Based on the observation and description of core and a great quantity of logging data, the rock phase and electrofacies were systematically analysised, the rock-electricity response mode which reflects the different sedimentation effect and sedimentary environment was established.
(4) Based on rock phase, electrofacies and rock-electricity response mode, the types and the character of sedimentary micro-facies were in-depth studied, accounted that the Fuyu oil layer in the studied area was characterized by the unique shallow lake-delta system, which mainly developed shallow lake-delta and shallow lake. Summarized the shallow lake-delta system depositional model of FuYu oil bed in the studied area combined with the research on the plane sedimentary micro-facies distribution of semi-cycle of mid-term datum level, and the distribution characteristic of reservoir sandstones is analyzed under the control of high resolution sequence stratigraphic framework.
(5) According to the principle of chemical kinetics, amount and period of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion were studied to the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation in the studied area, the result showed that the hydrocarbon generation period of the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation was begun at the last stage of Nenjiang formation to the beginning of Sifangtai formation in Upper Crataceous, hydrocarbon generation reached to the top at the last stage of Mingshui formation. Hydrocarbon generation amount of the 1th section of Qingshankou hydrocarbon formation was mainly in middle-east area of Sanzhao depression, Chaoyanggou terrace and Wangfu sag which is outside the studied area. Hydrocarbon generation centre was essentially distributed in the middle area of Sanzhao depression, but Chaoyanggou terrace also had the hydrocarbon generation capacity, which is different from the predecessors’awareness of the studies on this region.
(6) The oil-source correlation of Fuyu oil bed shows that the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Chaoyanggou region are mature source rocks, and there are two oil-sources of Fuyu oil bed in Chaoyanggou region: the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Sanzhao depression and the source rocks in Chaoyanggou region. The contribution of the two oil-sources to Fuyu oil bed may be same, which is consisted with the conclusion of the study on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history, and can confirm that the source rocks of the 1th section of Qingshankou in Chaoyanggou region has the oil generation and expulsion capability, as well as the accuracy of the study on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history.
(7) Based on the analysis of reservoir forming geologic conditions of Fuyu oil bed, the process of hydrocarbon forming was divided into four stages: hydrocarbon generation and expulsion, downward migration, parallel migration, and hydrocarbon accumulation. From the perspective of multi-factors geologic conditions and their matching relationship between spatial and temporal, confirmed the master control features of each estate in the hydrocarbon formed process. The result showed that the bound, distance and layer of hydrocarbon migrated downward were controlled by effective expulsion range of K1qn1 source rock, overpressure and T2 fault assemblage. The direction, pathway and distance of oil parallel migrated were controlled by palaeostructure and the relationship between T2 fault and reservoir. The oil and gas distribution in vertical and planar were controlled by cycle of base level, sedimentary microfacies and current tectonic.
(8) Combine with the results of the research on master control factors of every estate in the process of hydrocarbon accumulation, structural history, oil sources conditions and sedimentary micro-facies of research area, the hydrocarbon formed pattern was summarized to four types, they were, Inside source-upper source rock-lower reservoir model, Near source-short distance lateral migration-fault screened in slope zone model, Outside source-long distance lateral migration-inherited tectonic uplift zone model and Multi-source-Multi-lateral migration model.
(9) After summing up all the research results, there categories and six sub-categories reservoir forming zones are divided out in Fuyu oil bed, two favorable target areas and four favorable target traps are optimized.
引文
[1] C.K.威尔格斯,等编.徐怀大,等译.层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析) [M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,1~515.
[2]钱弈中,陈洪德,刘文均.层序地层学理论与方法研究[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994.
[3]池秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[4]纪友亮.层序地层学[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2005,1~203.
[5]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1.
[6] Vail P R. Sequence Stratigraphy Workbook,Fundamentals of Sequence Stratigraphy. In:AAPG Annual Convention Short Course . Houston,Texas,1988.
[7]薛良清.成因层序地层学的回顾与展望[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):454~455.
[8]谢渊,刘家铎,王剑等.陆相层序地层学研究进展与挑战[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):8~17.
[9]倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春等.陆相层序地层学理论体系及其发展趋势[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(4):35~43.
[10]蔡希源,李思田,樊太亮等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学一隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.1~2.
[11] Vail P R et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology-an overview In, G.Einsele et al(des.),Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy[C]. Springer-Verlag,1991,617-659.
[12] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Construction and application of a stratigraphic inverse model[A]. Numerical experiments in stratigraphy recent advances in stratigraphic and sedimentologic computersimulations[C]. Tulsa:SEPM 62, 1999.69~83.
[13] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Tectonic controls of foreland basin subsidence and Laramide style deformation, western Enited States[A]. P.A,.Allen. Homewood P, Williams G(eds). foreland basins[M]. an introduction. Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication 8,1986.15~39.
[14] Sangree J B. A summary of exploration aoolication to sequence stratigraphy. GCSSEPM foundation 11th annual research conference program and abstracts, December 2,1990.
[15]聂逢君.层序地层学的起源及其发展[J].铀矿地质,2001,17(6):193~202.
[16]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):8~13.
[17]吴富强,刘家铎,胡雪等.经典层序地层学与高分辨率层序地层学[J].中国海上油气(地质),2001 ,15(03): 65~68.
[18]杨国臣,于炳松.层序地层学的发展现状及其学科地位与研究前沿[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(2): 1~4.
[19]付志方,王焕弟,邢卫新等.层序地层学研究现状及进展[J].勘探地球物理进展,2005,28(05): 26~30.
[20] Vail P R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part1: Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure, In:C. W. Bally (ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy. AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):1~10.
[21] Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Mitchum R M,and Vail P R. et al.层序地层学基础综述和关键定义[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,49~55.
[22] Posamentier H W,Jervy M T and Vail P R.全球海平面升降对沉积作用的控制Ⅰ—概念构架[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,138~154.
[23] Posamentier H W,Jervy M T and Vail P R.全球海平面升降对沉积作用的控制Ⅱ—层序和体系域模型[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993, 155~184.
[24]Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysisⅠ: architecture and genesis of flooding surface bounded depositional units[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):125~142.
[25] Frazier D E. Depositional episodes: their relationship to the Quaternary stratigraphic framework in the northwestern portion of the Gull Basin[M] . The University of Texas at Austin,Bureau of Economic Geology 1974.1-28. 25(3):10~14.
[26] Johnson J G,Klapper G,Sandberg C A. Devonian eustatic fluctuations in Euramerica,Bull. Geol. Soc. America[M]. 1985,99:567~587.
[27]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派──高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995, 16(02): 89~97.
[28] Cross T A. Stratigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata [J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(4):322~332.
[29] Wheeler H E. Baselevel,lithosphere surface and time-stratigraphy. Bull. Geol. Soc.America. 1964,75:599~610.
[30]Krystinik L F,Dejarnett B B. Lateral variability of sequence stratigraphic framework in the Campanian and lower mastrichtian of the Western inferior Seaway. In:Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T. Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits-Outcrop and Subsurface Examples from The Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir 64.Tulsa,Oklahoma,U.S.A:Published by AAPG,1995.11~26.
[31]Schwans P. Controls on sequence stacking and fluvial to shallow marine architecture in Foreland Basin.In: Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T. Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits-Outcrop and Subsurface Examples from The Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir 64.Tulsa,Oklahoma,U.S.A:Published by AAPG,1995.11~26.
[32]Muto T and Steel R J. The middle Jurassic Oserberge delta, Northern sea-asedimentological and sequence stratigraphic interpretion. AAPG Bulltin, 1997,81(7):1070~1086.
[33] Shanely K W and McCabe P J. Perspective on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4): 544~568.
[34] Schumm S A. River response to base-level changes: Implication for sequence stratigraphy[J]. Journal of Geology,1993,101(3): 279~294.
[35]龚再升,李思田等著.南海北部大陆边缘盆地分析与油气聚集[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.
[36]姜在兴,操应长.砂体层序地层及沉积学研究—以山东惠民凹陷为例[M].地质出版社,2000.
[37] Xue Liangqing and Galloway W E. Genetic sequence stratigraphic framework, depositional style, and hydrocarbon occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN formations in the Songliao lacustrine basin, northeastern China. AAPG Bulletin, 1993,77(10): 1792~1808.
[38]王东坡,刘招君,刘立等.松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1991.
[39]魏魁生.非海相层序地层学—以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:地质出版社,1996.
[40]蔡希源,陈章明,王玉华等.松辽两江地区石油地质分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[41]刘招君.湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式—以松辽盆地西部斜坡区为例[J].长春地质学院学报,1997,27(增刊II):10.
[42]李思田等著.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部层序地层及沉积体系分析[M].北京:地质出版社,1992.
[43]顾家裕等著.塔里木盆地沉积层序特征及其演化[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[44] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, campion K M and Rahmanion V D, Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well, cores and outcrops-concept for high-resolution correlation of times and facies.AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 1990, (7): 1~55.
[45] Brown L F Jr,Benson J M,et al. Sequence stratigraphy in offshore South African divergent basin-an atlas on exploration for Cretaceous lowstand traps. AAPG studies in Geology # 41. Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A: Published by AAPG,1995,1~182.
[46]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙吉.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质, 1996, 17(3): 177~184.
[47] Cross T A.据高分辨率层序地层学认识地层结构、对比概念、体积分配、相分异和储层的间隔单元划分[J].杜宁平译.国外石油勘探,1996,8(3):285~294.
[48] Cross T A,Baker M R and Chapin M A,et al. Applications of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy to reservoir analysis[A]. Eschard R , Doligez B , eds. Reservoir Characterization From Outcrop Investigations [C]. Proceedings of the 7h Exploretion and Producetion Research Conference. Paris: Technip,1993,11~33.
[49] Dam G. and Surlyk F. Cyclic sedimentation in a large wave and storm-dominated anoxic lake; Kap Stewart Formation (Rhaethian-Sinemurian), Jameson Land, East Greenland. In: Posamentier H.W, Summerhayes C.P,Haq B.U,Allen G.P (eds). Sequence stratigraphy and facies associations. Int Assoc Sediment Spec Pual(Blackwell),1993,18:419~448.
[50]薛良清.层序地层学在湖相盆地中的应用探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1990,17(6):29~34.
[51]魏魁生,徐怀大.二连盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序地层学特征[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(2):181~193.
[52]夏文臣,华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(1):19~28.
[53]解习农.松辽盆地梨树凹陷深部断裂沉积体系及层序地层特征[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):144~150.
[54]姜在兴.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[55]郭少斌.松辽盆地南部西斜坡层序地层与油气聚集规律[J].石油实验地质,1997,19(4):340~348.
[56]郭少斌,曲永宝,王树学.陆相盆地层序及体系域模式——以松辽盆地西部斜坡为例[J].地质科技情报,1998,17 (4): 37~42.
[57]胡受权.泌阳断陷陆相层序外部构型研究[J].现代地质,1998,12(4):567~574.
[58]魏魁生等.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1993,18(2):139~149.
[59]陈世悦,刘焕杰.华北石炭二叠纪层序地层学研究的特点[J].岩相古地理,1994,(6):11~20.
[60]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):6~10.
[61]纪友亮,张世奇等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[62]解习农.断陷盆地构造作用与层序样式[J].地质论评,1996,42(3):398~412.
[63]魏魁生,叶淑芬等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(14):50~58.
[64]池英柳,张万选,张厚福,孙红军.陆相断陷盆地层序成因初探[J].石油学报,1996,17(3):19~25.
[65]魏志平,唐振兴,江涛等.长岭凹陷层序地层分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):170~173.
[66]郑荣才,叶泰然,翟文亮等.川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组砂体分布预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(3):405~411.
[67] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation[A].西北欧层序地层会议材料[C].1994.
[68]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军等.高分辨率层序地层学:原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.
[69]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1): 92~100.
[70]郑荣才,彭军等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4): 654~662.
[71]张明禄,郑荣才等.砂体等时对比的高分辨率层序分析技术[J].矿物岩石,2004,24(1): 113~120.
[72]汪彦,彭军等.中国高分辨率层序地层学的研究现状[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3): 352~358.
[73]张尚锋,张昌民等.中国高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].铀矿地质,2008,24(6): 332~338.
[74]邓宏文,王洪亮,宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理——高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘,2000,7 (4): 305~313.
[75]邓宏文,王洪亮.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2): 10~15.
[76]邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏等.河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报, 2004. 22(2): 373~379.
[77]邓宏文,徐长贵.陆东凹陷上侏罗统层序地层与生储盖组合[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4): 9~13.
[78]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2): 16~22.
[79]邓宏文,王洪亮.层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似特征——以三角洲-浊积扇体系为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5): 491~495.
[80]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4): 315~321.
[81]郑荣才,吴朝荣,叶茂才.浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路[J].成都理工学院学报,2000,27 (3): 241~244.
[82]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369~375.
[83]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝荣.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2): 249~255.
[84]郑小武,邓宏文,徐怀大等.测井高分辨率层序地层划分技术与应用尝试[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20 (4): 357~360.
[85]张尚锋,张昌民,陈新民等.坪北油田上三叠统延长组长4+5—长6油组地层基准面旋回及储层物性[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3): 87~91.
[86]尹太举,张昌民,李中超等.层序地层学在油田开发中的应用实践[J].沉积学报,2005,23 (4): 664~670.
[87]樊继宗,陈林媛,张素君等.高分辨率层序地层学在划分流动单元中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28 (5): 23~25.
[88]李少华,张昌民等.储层不确定性评价[J].西安石油大学学报,2004,19 (5): 16~24.
[89] Levorsen A I. The obscure and subtle trap[J]. AAPG Bull.,1966,50(10):2058~2067.
[90]A.I.莱复生著.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1975.
[91] Halbouty M T. The deliberate search for the subtle trap[C]. Oklahoma:AAPG Memoir 32,1982,1~8.
[92] Wilson W B. Proposed classification of oil and gas reservoirs [C]. Oklahoma:AAPG Sidney Powers Memorial Volum 1934,433~445.
[93]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光.中国东部陆相盆地地层岩性圈闭油气聚集区(带)的分布及勘探研究程序[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1984,3(1):6~21.
[94]陈荣书等.关于“隐秘圈闭(油气藏)”的早期概念[J].石油与天然气地质,1984,5(3):300~301.
[95]胡见义,徐树宝,刘淑萱等.非构造油气藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1986,69~146.
[96]李丕龙,庞雄奇.隐蔽油气藏形成机理与勘探实践[A].见:第三届隐蔽油气藏国际学术研讨会论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
[97] Kaufman G M, Balcer Y, Druyt D. A probabilistic modal of oil and gas discovery[A]. Methods ofEstimating the Volume of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Reserves(AAPG Studies in Geology#1)[C],1975,113~142.
[98]《大庆石油地质与开发》编辑部编.中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集[C].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1984.
[99] Michel T,Halbouty编,刘民中等译.寻找隐蔽油藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988.
[100]肖焕钦,陈广军,李常宝.陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏分类及勘探[J].特种油气藏,2002,9(5):10~12.
[101]陆建林,李思田等.南阳凹陷隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(1):27~28.
[102]杨万里.隐蔽油气藏勘探的实践与认识.中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集[C].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1984.
[103]沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬等.试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路石油学报,2000,21(1):16~21.
[104]林雄,田景春.非构造油气藏国内外研究现状及发展方向[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(4):63~70.
[105]Cordell R J. How oil migrate in plastic sediments[J]. World Oil. 1977,184:62~70.
[106]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇等.济阳成熟探区非构造油气藏深化勘探[J].石油学报,2003,24(5):10~15.
[107]Jia Chengzao,Chi Yingliu. Resource Potential and Exploration Techniques of Stratigraphic and subtle Reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Science,2004,1(2):1~12.
[108]李丕龙,庞雄奇等.陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成—以济阳坳陷为例[J].石油工业出版社,2004.
[109]张守昌,李晨,张泽慧等.地震技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(3):13~15.
[110]徐怀大.寻找非构造油气藏的新思路[J].勘探家,1996,1(1):212~216.
[111]丁贵明,张一伟,金之钧等.油气勘探工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,12~143.
[112]Tissot B.P and Welte D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence: a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,1984,435.
[113]Durand B. Kerogen– insoluble organic matter from sedimentary rocks[M]. Paris: Technop-Paris,1980,537.
[114]Magara K. Geological model Predicting optimum sandstone Percent for oil accumulation[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1978,26(3):287~302.
[115]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,248.
[116]赵文智,何登发.石油地质综合研究导论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,578.
[117]吴冲龙,何光玉.论油气系统与油气系统动力学[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2000,25(6):604~610.
[118]曾溅辉,王洪玉.疏导层和岩性圈闭中石油运移和聚集模拟实验研究[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,24(2):193~196.
[119]Hunt J.M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(l):l~12.
[120]Dow W G. Application of oil correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin[J]. AAPG,1972,56:615.
[121]Perrodon A,P Masse. Subsidence,sedimentation and Petroleum systems[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,1984,7(l):5~26.
[122]Perrodon A. Petroleum systems: models and applications[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,1992, 15(3):319~326.
[123]Demaison G,Murris R J. Petroleum geochemistry and basin evaluation[M] .AAPG Memoir 35,1974,426.
[124]田世澄,陈建渝,张树林等.论成藏动力学系统[J].勘探家,1996,1(2):20~24.
[125]王英民,钱奕中,邓林等.残余盆地成藏动力学过程研究方法[J].成都理工学院学报,1998,25(3):385~393.
[126]刘晓峰,解习农.超压释放及其对油气运移和聚集的意义[J].地质科技情报,2001,20(4):51~55.
[127]孙义梅,田世澄.断层对油气运移作用研究的新进展[J].地学前缘,2001,8(4):252.
[128]郝芳,董伟良.沉积盆地超压系统演化、流体流动与成藏机理[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(1):79~85.
[129]陈冬霞,庞雄奇,姜振学.透镜体油气成藏机理研究现状与发展趋势[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(6):871~876.
[130]宋国奇,穆星,车燕等.济阳坳陷溶解气运移释放成藏机理与模式[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):555~560.
[131]王永诗,张善文,曾溅辉等.沾化凹陷上第三系油气成藏机理及勘探实践[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(6):32~35.
[132]大庆油田石油地质志编辑委员会.中国石油地质志(卷二)—大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,115~164.
[133]刘丁曾,王启民,李伯虎.大庆多层砂岩油田开发[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,1~4.
[134]杨万里,王志武,钟其权等.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985,1~386.
[135]王永春.松辽盆地南部岩性油藏的形成和分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[136]高瑞祺,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
[137]高瑞祺,张莹,崔同翠著.松辽盆地白垩纪石油地层[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[138]吴崇筠,薛叔浩等著.中国含油气盆地沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992.
[139]薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清等.湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[140]Sloss L.L. Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America[J].GSA Bulletin,1963,74(1):93~114.
[141]Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation[A]. Gradstein F M,Sandvik K O,Milton N J,eds. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications[M]. NPF Special Publication,1998,8: 171~195.
[142]王璞珺,刘万洙.事件沉积导论实例应用[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2001.
[143]李延平,陈树民,宋永忠等.大庆长垣及以东泉三、四段扶杨油层浅水湖泊-三角洲体系沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(5):13~16.
[144]赵红格,刘池洋.物源分析方法及研究进展[J].沉积学报,2003,21(3):409~415.
[145]孙小霞,李勇,丘东洲等.黄骅坳陷新近系馆陶组重矿物特征及物源区意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2006,26(3):61~66.
[146]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~615.
[147]张元,郭翔,刘宏彦等.三塘湖盆地马朗地区重矿物特征及物源分析[J].中外能源,2007,12(4):48~51.
[148]Miall A D. Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis[M].New York: Springer-Verlag,1984: 133~143.
[149]张功成等.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法:以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[150]于兴河,王德发.陆相断陷盆地三角洲构型要素及其储层地质模型[J].地质评论,1997,43(1): 225~231.
[151]于兴河,王德发,郑浚茂.华北地区二叠系岩相组合类型、剖面特点及沉积体系[J].沉积学报,1992,10(1): 27~35.
[152]陈钢花,王中文,王湘文.河流相沉积微相与测井相研究[J].测井技术,1996,20 (5):335~340.
[153]马正.应用自然电位测井曲线解释沉积环境[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,3 (1):25~40.
[154]李彦芳,曲淑琴,辛仁臣.松辽盆地三角洲与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[155]柳成志,辛仁臣,王刚.松辽盆地北部头台地区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲沉积特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,1998,22(1):68~70.
[156]李延平,陈树民,宋永忠等.大庆长垣及以东泉三、四段扶杨油层浅水湖泊-三角洲体系沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(5):13~16.
[157]隋军,吕小光,赵翰卿等.大庆油田河流-三角洲相储层研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.
[158]杨万里,高瑞祺等.松辽盆地陆相油气生成、运移和聚集[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1985.
[159]Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Mitchum R M,et al. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key defini-tions[M].SEPM SpecialPublication,1988:39~45.
[160]李延平,于坤,姜耀俭等.松辽盆地泉四段扶余油层地层层序新认识[J].中国海洋大学学报,2007,37(6):977~982.
[161]郭康良,庄新兵,周永炳. P333试验区应用高分辨率层序地层学对比与划分小层[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2007,29(3):52~55.
[162]王始波,任延广,林铁锋等.松辽盆地泉三、四段高分辨率层序地层格架[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(5):1~5.
[163]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[164]邓宏文,吴海波等.河流相层序地层划分方法——以松辽盆地下白垩统扶余油层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(05): 621~627.
[165]辛仁臣,张雪辉,张翼等.湖盆无曝露缓坡带层序界面特征及成因[J].沉积学报,2008,26(1):77~85.
[166]马世忠.松辽盆地河流—三角洲体系高分辨率层序地层学、储层构形及非均质模型研究:[博士学位论文],中国科学院,北京:2003.
[167]庄新兵,郭康良,周永炳.高分辨层序地层学在大庆长垣以东扶、杨油层地层界面识别的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,(2):94~96.
[168]吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报, 1999,26(04): 375~381.
[169]柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(01): 50~56.
[170]尹太举,张昌民,李中超等.濮城油田沙三中6-10砂组高分辨率层序地层研究[J].沉积学报,2003,21(04): 663~669.
[171]王永春.伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[172]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶余、杨大城子油层油源与油气运移模式探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(1):5~8.
[173]迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制[J].地质学报,2000,74(4):371~377.
[174]吴河勇,李景坤.松辽盆地北部深层原油的碳同位素特征及成因探讨[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(3) :300~304.
[175]卢双舫.有机质成烃动力学理论及其应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[176]卢双舫等.煤岩有机质成油、成气热模拟动力学模型的建立及标定[J].地质科学,1996,31(1):15~21
[177]卢双舫,付晓泰,王振平等.油成气的动力学模型及其标定[J].天然气工业,1996,16(6):6~9.
[178]卢双舫,付晓泰,陈昕等.原油族组分成气的化学动力学模型及其标定[J].地质学报,1997,71(4):367~373.
[179]庞雄奇等.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模拟研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[180]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论及其应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[181]卢双舫,黄第藩,程克明.煤成烃生成、运移模拟实验的固体残样特征及其演化[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(3):46~51.
[182]卢双舫,薛海涛,钟宁宁.石油保存下限的化学动力学研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(6):1~3.
[183]薛海涛,王欢欢,卢双舫等.碳酸盐岩油源岩有机质丰度分级评价标准[J].沉积学报,2007,25(5) :782~786.
[184]冯子辉,李景坤,要丹.朝阳沟油田原油地球化学特征及油源探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1994,13(4):23~26.
[185]霍秋立,冯子辉,付丽等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶杨油层石油运移方式[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):25~27.
[186]杨喜贵,付广.松辽盆地北部扶杨油层油气成藏与分布的主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2002,9(2):8~11.
[187]邹才能,贾承造,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏动力和分布规律[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):125~130.
[188]Bradley J S. Abnormal formation pressure[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1975,59:957~973.
[189]Magara K. Compaction and fluid migration-practical petroleum geology[M]. Amsterdam,Elsevier,1978.
[190]Hunt J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(1) :1~12.
[191]吕延防.油气保存条件[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1997.
[192]付广,吕延防,杨勉.欠压实泥岩异常孔隙流体压力的定量研究[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(4) :295~298.
[193]付广,李晓伟.源外上生下储成藏主控因素及有利区预测——以松辽盆地尚家地区泉二段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1) :1~5.
[194]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2) :355~360.
[195]吕延防,李建民,付晓飞等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷油气下排的地质条件及找油方向[J].地质科学, 2009,44(2) :525~533.
[196]付晓飞,平贵东,范瑞东等.三肇凹陷扶杨油层油气“倒灌”运聚成藏规律研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3) :558~566.
[197]Hindle A D. Petroleum migration pathways and charge concentration: a three-dimensional model[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(8) :1451~1481.
[198]李本亮,王明明,魏国齐等.柴达木盆地三湖地区生物气横向运聚成藏研究[J].地质论评,2003,49(1) :93~100.
[199]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶杨油层油气藏分布规律及勘探前景分析[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(1) :1~4.
[200]施立志,吴河勇,林铁锋等.松辽盆地大庆长垣及其以西地区扶杨油层油气运移特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(6) :21~26.
[201]吴冲龙,周江羽,王根发等.鄂尔多斯古构造应力场与中部大气田的联系[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(4) :267~275.
[202]董福湘,刘立,何兴华等.松辽盆地南部十屋断陷古构造对营城组扇三角洲发育的控制[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(4) :464~468.
[203]漆家福,杨桥,王子煜等.关于编制盆地构造演化剖面的几个问题的讨论[J].地质论评,2001,47(4) :388~392.
[204]漆家福,杨桥,王子煜.编制盆地复原古构造图的若干问题的讨论[J].地质科学,2003,38(3) :413~424.
[205]沈安江,吴海波,孙辉等.松辽盆地肇源—太平川地区扶余油层油藏类型及成藏控制因素[J].中国石油勘探,2009,(1) :17~23.
[2]钱弈中,陈洪德,刘文均.层序地层学理论与方法研究[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994.
[3]池秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[4]纪友亮.层序地层学[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2005,1~203.
[5]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1.
[6] Vail P R. Sequence Stratigraphy Workbook,Fundamentals of Sequence Stratigraphy. In:AAPG Annual Convention Short Course . Houston,Texas,1988.
[7]薛良清.成因层序地层学的回顾与展望[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):454~455.
[8]谢渊,刘家铎,王剑等.陆相层序地层学研究进展与挑战[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):8~17.
[9]倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春等.陆相层序地层学理论体系及其发展趋势[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(4):35~43.
[10]蔡希源,李思田,樊太亮等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学一隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.1~2.
[11] Vail P R et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology-an overview In, G.Einsele et al(des.),Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy[C]. Springer-Verlag,1991,617-659.
[12] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Construction and application of a stratigraphic inverse model[A]. Numerical experiments in stratigraphy recent advances in stratigraphic and sedimentologic computersimulations[C]. Tulsa:SEPM 62, 1999.69~83.
[13] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Tectonic controls of foreland basin subsidence and Laramide style deformation, western Enited States[A]. P.A,.Allen. Homewood P, Williams G(eds). foreland basins[M]. an introduction. Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication 8,1986.15~39.
[14] Sangree J B. A summary of exploration aoolication to sequence stratigraphy. GCSSEPM foundation 11th annual research conference program and abstracts, December 2,1990.
[15]聂逢君.层序地层学的起源及其发展[J].铀矿地质,2001,17(6):193~202.
[16]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):8~13.
[17]吴富强,刘家铎,胡雪等.经典层序地层学与高分辨率层序地层学[J].中国海上油气(地质),2001 ,15(03): 65~68.
[18]杨国臣,于炳松.层序地层学的发展现状及其学科地位与研究前沿[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(2): 1~4.
[19]付志方,王焕弟,邢卫新等.层序地层学研究现状及进展[J].勘探地球物理进展,2005,28(05): 26~30.
[20] Vail P R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part1: Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure, In:C. W. Bally (ed),Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy. AAPG Studies in Geology,1987,(27):1~10.
[21] Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Mitchum R M,and Vail P R. et al.层序地层学基础综述和关键定义[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,49~55.
[22] Posamentier H W,Jervy M T and Vail P R.全球海平面升降对沉积作用的控制Ⅰ—概念构架[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,138~154.
[23] Posamentier H W,Jervy M T and Vail P R.全球海平面升降对沉积作用的控制Ⅱ—层序和体系域模型[A].徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理—海平面变化综合分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993, 155~184.
[24]Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysisⅠ: architecture and genesis of flooding surface bounded depositional units[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):125~142.
[25] Frazier D E. Depositional episodes: their relationship to the Quaternary stratigraphic framework in the northwestern portion of the Gull Basin[M] . The University of Texas at Austin,Bureau of Economic Geology 1974.1-28. 25(3):10~14.
[26] Johnson J G,Klapper G,Sandberg C A. Devonian eustatic fluctuations in Euramerica,Bull. Geol. Soc. America[M]. 1985,99:567~587.
[27]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派──高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995, 16(02): 89~97.
[28] Cross T A. Stratigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata [J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(4):322~332.
[29] Wheeler H E. Baselevel,lithosphere surface and time-stratigraphy. Bull. Geol. Soc.America. 1964,75:599~610.
[30]Krystinik L F,Dejarnett B B. Lateral variability of sequence stratigraphic framework in the Campanian and lower mastrichtian of the Western inferior Seaway. In:Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T. Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits-Outcrop and Subsurface Examples from The Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir 64.Tulsa,Oklahoma,U.S.A:Published by AAPG,1995.11~26.
[31]Schwans P. Controls on sequence stacking and fluvial to shallow marine architecture in Foreland Basin.In: Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T. Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits-Outcrop and Subsurface Examples from The Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir 64.Tulsa,Oklahoma,U.S.A:Published by AAPG,1995.11~26.
[32]Muto T and Steel R J. The middle Jurassic Oserberge delta, Northern sea-asedimentological and sequence stratigraphic interpretion. AAPG Bulltin, 1997,81(7):1070~1086.
[33] Shanely K W and McCabe P J. Perspective on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4): 544~568.
[34] Schumm S A. River response to base-level changes: Implication for sequence stratigraphy[J]. Journal of Geology,1993,101(3): 279~294.
[35]龚再升,李思田等著.南海北部大陆边缘盆地分析与油气聚集[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.
[36]姜在兴,操应长.砂体层序地层及沉积学研究—以山东惠民凹陷为例[M].地质出版社,2000.
[37] Xue Liangqing and Galloway W E. Genetic sequence stratigraphic framework, depositional style, and hydrocarbon occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN formations in the Songliao lacustrine basin, northeastern China. AAPG Bulletin, 1993,77(10): 1792~1808.
[38]王东坡,刘招君,刘立等.松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1991.
[39]魏魁生.非海相层序地层学—以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:地质出版社,1996.
[40]蔡希源,陈章明,王玉华等.松辽两江地区石油地质分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[41]刘招君.湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式—以松辽盆地西部斜坡区为例[J].长春地质学院学报,1997,27(增刊II):10.
[42]李思田等著.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部层序地层及沉积体系分析[M].北京:地质出版社,1992.
[43]顾家裕等著.塔里木盆地沉积层序特征及其演化[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[44] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, campion K M and Rahmanion V D, Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well, cores and outcrops-concept for high-resolution correlation of times and facies.AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 1990, (7): 1~55.
[45] Brown L F Jr,Benson J M,et al. Sequence stratigraphy in offshore South African divergent basin-an atlas on exploration for Cretaceous lowstand traps. AAPG studies in Geology # 41. Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A: Published by AAPG,1995,1~182.
[46]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙吉.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质, 1996, 17(3): 177~184.
[47] Cross T A.据高分辨率层序地层学认识地层结构、对比概念、体积分配、相分异和储层的间隔单元划分[J].杜宁平译.国外石油勘探,1996,8(3):285~294.
[48] Cross T A,Baker M R and Chapin M A,et al. Applications of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy to reservoir analysis[A]. Eschard R , Doligez B , eds. Reservoir Characterization From Outcrop Investigations [C]. Proceedings of the 7h Exploretion and Producetion Research Conference. Paris: Technip,1993,11~33.
[49] Dam G. and Surlyk F. Cyclic sedimentation in a large wave and storm-dominated anoxic lake; Kap Stewart Formation (Rhaethian-Sinemurian), Jameson Land, East Greenland. In: Posamentier H.W, Summerhayes C.P,Haq B.U,Allen G.P (eds). Sequence stratigraphy and facies associations. Int Assoc Sediment Spec Pual(Blackwell),1993,18:419~448.
[50]薛良清.层序地层学在湖相盆地中的应用探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1990,17(6):29~34.
[51]魏魁生,徐怀大.二连盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序地层学特征[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(2):181~193.
[52]夏文臣,华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1994,19(1):19~28.
[53]解习农.松辽盆地梨树凹陷深部断裂沉积体系及层序地层特征[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):144~150.
[54]姜在兴.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[55]郭少斌.松辽盆地南部西斜坡层序地层与油气聚集规律[J].石油实验地质,1997,19(4):340~348.
[56]郭少斌,曲永宝,王树学.陆相盆地层序及体系域模式——以松辽盆地西部斜坡为例[J].地质科技情报,1998,17 (4): 37~42.
[57]胡受权.泌阳断陷陆相层序外部构型研究[J].现代地质,1998,12(4):567~574.
[58]魏魁生等.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1993,18(2):139~149.
[59]陈世悦,刘焕杰.华北石炭二叠纪层序地层学研究的特点[J].岩相古地理,1994,(6):11~20.
[60]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):6~10.
[61]纪友亮,张世奇等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[62]解习农.断陷盆地构造作用与层序样式[J].地质论评,1996,42(3):398~412.
[63]魏魁生,叶淑芬等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报,1996,14(14):50~58.
[64]池英柳,张万选,张厚福,孙红军.陆相断陷盆地层序成因初探[J].石油学报,1996,17(3):19~25.
[65]魏志平,唐振兴,江涛等.长岭凹陷层序地层分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):170~173.
[66]郑荣才,叶泰然,翟文亮等.川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组砂体分布预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(3):405~411.
[67] Cross T A,Lessenger M A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation[A].西北欧层序地层会议材料[C].1994.
[68]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军等.高分辨率层序地层学:原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.
[69]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1): 92~100.
[70]郑荣才,彭军等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4): 654~662.
[71]张明禄,郑荣才等.砂体等时对比的高分辨率层序分析技术[J].矿物岩石,2004,24(1): 113~120.
[72]汪彦,彭军等.中国高分辨率层序地层学的研究现状[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(3): 352~358.
[73]张尚锋,张昌民等.中国高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].铀矿地质,2008,24(6): 332~338.
[74]邓宏文,王洪亮,宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理——高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘,2000,7 (4): 305~313.
[75]邓宏文,王洪亮.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2): 10~15.
[76]邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏等.河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报, 2004. 22(2): 373~379.
[77]邓宏文,徐长贵.陆东凹陷上侏罗统层序地层与生储盖组合[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4): 9~13.
[78]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2): 16~22.
[79]邓宏文,王洪亮.层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似特征——以三角洲-浊积扇体系为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5): 491~495.
[80]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4): 315~321.
[81]郑荣才,吴朝荣,叶茂才.浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路[J].成都理工学院学报,2000,27 (3): 241~244.
[82]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369~375.
[83]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝荣.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2): 249~255.
[84]郑小武,邓宏文,徐怀大等.测井高分辨率层序地层划分技术与应用尝试[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20 (4): 357~360.
[85]张尚锋,张昌民,陈新民等.坪北油田上三叠统延长组长4+5—长6油组地层基准面旋回及储层物性[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3): 87~91.
[86]尹太举,张昌民,李中超等.层序地层学在油田开发中的应用实践[J].沉积学报,2005,23 (4): 664~670.
[87]樊继宗,陈林媛,张素君等.高分辨率层序地层学在划分流动单元中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28 (5): 23~25.
[88]李少华,张昌民等.储层不确定性评价[J].西安石油大学学报,2004,19 (5): 16~24.
[89] Levorsen A I. The obscure and subtle trap[J]. AAPG Bull.,1966,50(10):2058~2067.
[90]A.I.莱复生著.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1975.
[91] Halbouty M T. The deliberate search for the subtle trap[C]. Oklahoma:AAPG Memoir 32,1982,1~8.
[92] Wilson W B. Proposed classification of oil and gas reservoirs [C]. Oklahoma:AAPG Sidney Powers Memorial Volum 1934,433~445.
[93]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光.中国东部陆相盆地地层岩性圈闭油气聚集区(带)的分布及勘探研究程序[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1984,3(1):6~21.
[94]陈荣书等.关于“隐秘圈闭(油气藏)”的早期概念[J].石油与天然气地质,1984,5(3):300~301.
[95]胡见义,徐树宝,刘淑萱等.非构造油气藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1986,69~146.
[96]李丕龙,庞雄奇.隐蔽油气藏形成机理与勘探实践[A].见:第三届隐蔽油气藏国际学术研讨会论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
[97] Kaufman G M, Balcer Y, Druyt D. A probabilistic modal of oil and gas discovery[A]. Methods ofEstimating the Volume of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Reserves(AAPG Studies in Geology#1)[C],1975,113~142.
[98]《大庆石油地质与开发》编辑部编.中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集[C].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1984.
[99] Michel T,Halbouty编,刘民中等译.寻找隐蔽油藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988.
[100]肖焕钦,陈广军,李常宝.陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏分类及勘探[J].特种油气藏,2002,9(5):10~12.
[101]陆建林,李思田等.南阳凹陷隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(1):27~28.
[102]杨万里.隐蔽油气藏勘探的实践与认识.中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集[C].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1984.
[103]沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬等.试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路石油学报,2000,21(1):16~21.
[104]林雄,田景春.非构造油气藏国内外研究现状及发展方向[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(4):63~70.
[105]Cordell R J. How oil migrate in plastic sediments[J]. World Oil. 1977,184:62~70.
[106]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇等.济阳成熟探区非构造油气藏深化勘探[J].石油学报,2003,24(5):10~15.
[107]Jia Chengzao,Chi Yingliu. Resource Potential and Exploration Techniques of Stratigraphic and subtle Reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Science,2004,1(2):1~12.
[108]李丕龙,庞雄奇等.陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成—以济阳坳陷为例[J].石油工业出版社,2004.
[109]张守昌,李晨,张泽慧等.地震技术在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(3):13~15.
[110]徐怀大.寻找非构造油气藏的新思路[J].勘探家,1996,1(1):212~216.
[111]丁贵明,张一伟,金之钧等.油气勘探工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,12~143.
[112]Tissot B.P and Welte D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence: a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,1984,435.
[113]Durand B. Kerogen– insoluble organic matter from sedimentary rocks[M]. Paris: Technop-Paris,1980,537.
[114]Magara K. Geological model Predicting optimum sandstone Percent for oil accumulation[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1978,26(3):287~302.
[115]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,248.
[116]赵文智,何登发.石油地质综合研究导论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,578.
[117]吴冲龙,何光玉.论油气系统与油气系统动力学[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2000,25(6):604~610.
[118]曾溅辉,王洪玉.疏导层和岩性圈闭中石油运移和聚集模拟实验研究[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,24(2):193~196.
[119]Hunt J.M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(l):l~12.
[120]Dow W G. Application of oil correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin[J]. AAPG,1972,56:615.
[121]Perrodon A,P Masse. Subsidence,sedimentation and Petroleum systems[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,1984,7(l):5~26.
[122]Perrodon A. Petroleum systems: models and applications[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,1992, 15(3):319~326.
[123]Demaison G,Murris R J. Petroleum geochemistry and basin evaluation[M] .AAPG Memoir 35,1974,426.
[124]田世澄,陈建渝,张树林等.论成藏动力学系统[J].勘探家,1996,1(2):20~24.
[125]王英民,钱奕中,邓林等.残余盆地成藏动力学过程研究方法[J].成都理工学院学报,1998,25(3):385~393.
[126]刘晓峰,解习农.超压释放及其对油气运移和聚集的意义[J].地质科技情报,2001,20(4):51~55.
[127]孙义梅,田世澄.断层对油气运移作用研究的新进展[J].地学前缘,2001,8(4):252.
[128]郝芳,董伟良.沉积盆地超压系统演化、流体流动与成藏机理[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(1):79~85.
[129]陈冬霞,庞雄奇,姜振学.透镜体油气成藏机理研究现状与发展趋势[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(6):871~876.
[130]宋国奇,穆星,车燕等.济阳坳陷溶解气运移释放成藏机理与模式[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):555~560.
[131]王永诗,张善文,曾溅辉等.沾化凹陷上第三系油气成藏机理及勘探实践[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(6):32~35.
[132]大庆油田石油地质志编辑委员会.中国石油地质志(卷二)—大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,115~164.
[133]刘丁曾,王启民,李伯虎.大庆多层砂岩油田开发[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,1~4.
[134]杨万里,王志武,钟其权等.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985,1~386.
[135]王永春.松辽盆地南部岩性油藏的形成和分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[136]高瑞祺,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
[137]高瑞祺,张莹,崔同翠著.松辽盆地白垩纪石油地层[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[138]吴崇筠,薛叔浩等著.中国含油气盆地沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992.
[139]薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清等.湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[140]Sloss L.L. Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America[J].GSA Bulletin,1963,74(1):93~114.
[141]Cross T A,Lessenger M A. Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation[A]. Gradstein F M,Sandvik K O,Milton N J,eds. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications[M]. NPF Special Publication,1998,8: 171~195.
[142]王璞珺,刘万洙.事件沉积导论实例应用[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2001.
[143]李延平,陈树民,宋永忠等.大庆长垣及以东泉三、四段扶杨油层浅水湖泊-三角洲体系沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(5):13~16.
[144]赵红格,刘池洋.物源分析方法及研究进展[J].沉积学报,2003,21(3):409~415.
[145]孙小霞,李勇,丘东洲等.黄骅坳陷新近系馆陶组重矿物特征及物源区意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2006,26(3):61~66.
[146]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~615.
[147]张元,郭翔,刘宏彦等.三塘湖盆地马朗地区重矿物特征及物源分析[J].中外能源,2007,12(4):48~51.
[148]Miall A D. Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis[M].New York: Springer-Verlag,1984: 133~143.
[149]张功成等.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法:以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[150]于兴河,王德发.陆相断陷盆地三角洲构型要素及其储层地质模型[J].地质评论,1997,43(1): 225~231.
[151]于兴河,王德发,郑浚茂.华北地区二叠系岩相组合类型、剖面特点及沉积体系[J].沉积学报,1992,10(1): 27~35.
[152]陈钢花,王中文,王湘文.河流相沉积微相与测井相研究[J].测井技术,1996,20 (5):335~340.
[153]马正.应用自然电位测井曲线解释沉积环境[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,3 (1):25~40.
[154]李彦芳,曲淑琴,辛仁臣.松辽盆地三角洲与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[155]柳成志,辛仁臣,王刚.松辽盆地北部头台地区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲沉积特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,1998,22(1):68~70.
[156]李延平,陈树民,宋永忠等.大庆长垣及以东泉三、四段扶杨油层浅水湖泊-三角洲体系沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(5):13~16.
[157]隋军,吕小光,赵翰卿等.大庆油田河流-三角洲相储层研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.
[158]杨万里,高瑞祺等.松辽盆地陆相油气生成、运移和聚集[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1985.
[159]Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Mitchum R M,et al. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key defini-tions[M].SEPM SpecialPublication,1988:39~45.
[160]李延平,于坤,姜耀俭等.松辽盆地泉四段扶余油层地层层序新认识[J].中国海洋大学学报,2007,37(6):977~982.
[161]郭康良,庄新兵,周永炳. P333试验区应用高分辨率层序地层学对比与划分小层[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2007,29(3):52~55.
[162]王始波,任延广,林铁锋等.松辽盆地泉三、四段高分辨率层序地层格架[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(5):1~5.
[163]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[164]邓宏文,吴海波等.河流相层序地层划分方法——以松辽盆地下白垩统扶余油层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(05): 621~627.
[165]辛仁臣,张雪辉,张翼等.湖盆无曝露缓坡带层序界面特征及成因[J].沉积学报,2008,26(1):77~85.
[166]马世忠.松辽盆地河流—三角洲体系高分辨率层序地层学、储层构形及非均质模型研究:[博士学位论文],中国科学院,北京:2003.
[167]庄新兵,郭康良,周永炳.高分辨层序地层学在大庆长垣以东扶、杨油层地层界面识别的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,(2):94~96.
[168]吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报, 1999,26(04): 375~381.
[169]柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(01): 50~56.
[170]尹太举,张昌民,李中超等.濮城油田沙三中6-10砂组高分辨率层序地层研究[J].沉积学报,2003,21(04): 663~669.
[171]王永春.伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[172]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶余、杨大城子油层油源与油气运移模式探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(1):5~8.
[173]迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制[J].地质学报,2000,74(4):371~377.
[174]吴河勇,李景坤.松辽盆地北部深层原油的碳同位素特征及成因探讨[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(3) :300~304.
[175]卢双舫.有机质成烃动力学理论及其应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[176]卢双舫等.煤岩有机质成油、成气热模拟动力学模型的建立及标定[J].地质科学,1996,31(1):15~21
[177]卢双舫,付晓泰,王振平等.油成气的动力学模型及其标定[J].天然气工业,1996,16(6):6~9.
[178]卢双舫,付晓泰,陈昕等.原油族组分成气的化学动力学模型及其标定[J].地质学报,1997,71(4):367~373.
[179]庞雄奇等.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模拟研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[180]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论及其应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[181]卢双舫,黄第藩,程克明.煤成烃生成、运移模拟实验的固体残样特征及其演化[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(3):46~51.
[182]卢双舫,薛海涛,钟宁宁.石油保存下限的化学动力学研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(6):1~3.
[183]薛海涛,王欢欢,卢双舫等.碳酸盐岩油源岩有机质丰度分级评价标准[J].沉积学报,2007,25(5) :782~786.
[184]冯子辉,李景坤,要丹.朝阳沟油田原油地球化学特征及油源探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1994,13(4):23~26.
[185]霍秋立,冯子辉,付丽等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶杨油层石油运移方式[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):25~27.
[186]杨喜贵,付广.松辽盆地北部扶杨油层油气成藏与分布的主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2002,9(2):8~11.
[187]邹才能,贾承造,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏动力和分布规律[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):125~130.
[188]Bradley J S. Abnormal formation pressure[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1975,59:957~973.
[189]Magara K. Compaction and fluid migration-practical petroleum geology[M]. Amsterdam,Elsevier,1978.
[190]Hunt J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(1) :1~12.
[191]吕延防.油气保存条件[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1997.
[192]付广,吕延防,杨勉.欠压实泥岩异常孔隙流体压力的定量研究[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(4) :295~298.
[193]付广,李晓伟.源外上生下储成藏主控因素及有利区预测——以松辽盆地尚家地区泉二段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1) :1~5.
[194]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2) :355~360.
[195]吕延防,李建民,付晓飞等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷油气下排的地质条件及找油方向[J].地质科学, 2009,44(2) :525~533.
[196]付晓飞,平贵东,范瑞东等.三肇凹陷扶杨油层油气“倒灌”运聚成藏规律研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3) :558~566.
[197]Hindle A D. Petroleum migration pathways and charge concentration: a three-dimensional model[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(8) :1451~1481.
[198]李本亮,王明明,魏国齐等.柴达木盆地三湖地区生物气横向运聚成藏研究[J].地质论评,2003,49(1) :93~100.
[199]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶杨油层油气藏分布规律及勘探前景分析[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(1) :1~4.
[200]施立志,吴河勇,林铁锋等.松辽盆地大庆长垣及其以西地区扶杨油层油气运移特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(6) :21~26.
[201]吴冲龙,周江羽,王根发等.鄂尔多斯古构造应力场与中部大气田的联系[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(4) :267~275.
[202]董福湘,刘立,何兴华等.松辽盆地南部十屋断陷古构造对营城组扇三角洲发育的控制[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(4) :464~468.
[203]漆家福,杨桥,王子煜等.关于编制盆地构造演化剖面的几个问题的讨论[J].地质论评,2001,47(4) :388~392.
[204]漆家福,杨桥,王子煜.编制盆地复原古构造图的若干问题的讨论[J].地质科学,2003,38(3) :413~424.
[205]沈安江,吴海波,孙辉等.松辽盆地肇源—太平川地区扶余油层油藏类型及成藏控制因素[J].中国石油勘探,2009,(1) :17~23.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |