用户名: 密码: 验证码:
鲁西地区晚中生代以来伸展断裂系统研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
论文通过野外地质调查、地震、测井、钻井等方法,以构造解析法为指导,借助磷灰石、锆石裂变径迹、K-Ar测年技术,研究了鲁西地区晚中生代以来伸展断裂系统的几何学、运动学及年代学特征;运用物理模拟实验、岩浆岩岩相学探讨了其形成的深部背景和形成机制,揭示了其发育演化过程。
     鲁西地区伸展断裂系统由陡倾斜正断层和缓倾斜滑脱断层组成。陡倾斜正断层走向为NW向和近EW向,倾角约60°~70°,在平面上由南向北近平行排列,规模大、发育时间较长、切割较深,控制了半地堑晚中生代以来的沉积。断裂带中发育断层角砾岩、碎裂岩、断层泥、擦痕等,表明断层经历了多期构造活动。浅层次缓倾斜滑脱断层主要沿下古生界/太古宇和上、下古生界不整合面发育。滑脱带厚度不等,产状与地层产状基本一致。滑脱带上岩石破碎,伴有硅化、大理岩化等动力变质作用,小褶皱,擦痕、阶步等现象发育。陡倾斜断层与浅层次滑脱断层组成伸展滑脱断块,构成了鲁西地区晚中生代以来的构造样式。断层伸展量和垂向活动速率表明陡倾正断层晚中生代发生构造负反转,鲁西地区开始伸展。古近纪(始新世),断层活动最强,鲁西地区遭受强烈伸展。新近纪,断层基本不再活动,伸展作用减弱,代之以区域拗陷作用。缓倾斜滑脱断层顺地层倾向滑动,主要为NE、NNE向。深层次滑脱断层由陡断层在深处某一滑脱面上拆离、滑脱形成,转换为中地壳或地壳深部拆离滑脱断层,逆地层倾向,向南滑动。
     磷灰石、锆石裂变径迹及t-T模拟表明,隆起区断层的下盘蒙山、莲花山、泰山于晚白垩世开始抬升,新生代主要经历了65~60Ma,48~42Ma,25~20Ma三个快速抬升时期。坳陷内次级凸起晚白垩世以来抬升时期与隆起区山体的抬升时期基本吻合。结合晚中生代以来的沉积响应以及区域岩浆活动特征研究认为陡断层活动主要在晚侏罗-早白垩世、65~60Ma,48~42Ma三个时期。同时,揭示了晚中生代以来陡倾斜正断层由南向北、由东向西的构造迁移规律。缓倾斜滑脱断层带上顺层侵入岩的K-Ar同位素测年数据表明区域性滑脱最早发生在130-110Ma,其次为60-55Ma左右,第三期大致在45-40Ma左右,与陡断层测年时间吻合,反映了两类断层的发育在时间上基本准同时。
     岩浆岩岩相学和构造物理模拟实验表明,鲁西地区晚中生代以来伸展断裂系统形成的深部背景为晚中生代-新生代软流圈物质上涌交代、置换、化学侵蚀导致岩石圈拆沉、大规模减薄所造成的深层和浅层伸展作用。两类伸展断层的发育期次与区域构造应力场相匹配。在形成机制上归因于晚中生代太平洋板块俯冲、郯庐断裂的走滑作用和新生代印欧板块的碰撞。
Based on field survey, combining with date of seismic, logging and drilling, the study on the characteristics of extensional fault in western Shandong is carried out mainly by methods of structural analysis, with the help of apatite fission track and K-Ar dating. Incidentally, this thesis investigates the deep background, developing mechanism of the extensional fault system and reveals the evolution process of it by methods of physical modeling and magmatic petrography.
     Steep normal fault and Shallow décollement fault composed the fault system of the western Shandong. With large scales, long developing time and deep cutting, 60°~70°of dip angle, the NW-trending and nearly EW-trending boundary extension faults which are parallel aligning from south to north in western Shandong, control the sediment of the half-grabent that has formed since late Mesozoic. Breccia, cataclasite and fault gouge developed in the fault belt indicate that it has undergone several tectonic movement. The analysis also suggests that shallow gently dipping décollement fault mainly developed along the unconformity between the Cambrian and Archean. Although the thickness of décollement fault belt varies from each other, the attitude is consistent with the stratums’. At the décollement fault belt, there are cataclastic rocks with dynamo-metamorphic rocks and some small folds, scratches, steps, and so on. Shallow décollement fault and steep normal fault composed the structure style of the western Shandong. Horizontal extension amount and vertical activity rate of normal faults show that the steep naormal faults reversed negatively in late Mesozoic, and western Shangdong began to extention. In the Paleogene, the activity rates of the NW-trending faults reached peak, western Shangdong subjected to strong extension. Then, in the Neogene, faults hardly activated, and western Shandong approximately trended to be stable. Décollement faults slided along the strata dip. The directions are NE and NNE. Steep normal faults detached from a certain deep décollement surfaces, and become deep detachment faults in deep crust or low velocity layer in mid-crust. They slided direction is south and opposited to the strata dip.
     Apatite, zircon fission track, and cooling history simulation of the samples in steep faults’footwall manifest that Mengshan, Lianhuash, and Mountain Tai began to uplift in late Cretaceous. Cenozoic can be diviede into three rapid uplifting stages. They are 65~60Ma,48~42Ma and 25~20Ma. That, at the same, is reflected by the samples in depression. Combined with the uplifting velocity of these three stages in Cenozoic, sedimentary characteristics and igneous raock features, the results show that the main active periods are late Jurassic-early Cretaceous, 65~60Ma,48~42Ma. And they indicate a law that the activation of steep normal faults strengthens gradually from south to north, east to west.
     According to the analysis of K-Ar isotopic data of bedding intrusive rock in fault belt, the earliest regional décollement happened during 130-110Ma, with another two during 55Ma and 45Ma. The consistence in time with the developed periods of steep normal faults reflects that intense activities can promote the development of gently dipping décollement faults.
     The analysis of physical modeling and magmatic petrography indicates that the development of extensional faults system in western Shandong is attributed to the deep extension brought about by the delaminating and thinning of lithosphere in late Mesozoic and the shallow extension caused by the upwelling of asthenosphere mantle in Cenozoic. These two kinds of extension faults are consistent with each other in both development phase and regional tectonic stress field. In mechanism,it was caused by the subduction of the Pacific Plate in late Mesozoic, the strike-slipping of Tanlu Fault and the Indo-Asian collision in Cenozoic.
引文
[1]张自桓.鲁西伸展构造—一个中-上地壳板块的提示[J].山东地质,1995:23-31
    [2]王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践[M].山东东营:石油大学出版社,1992
    [3]吕朋菊,张明利,朱兴珊.泰山周围下古生界与泰山群不整合面上滑动构造的发现[J].地质论评,1990,38(5):473-478
    [4]李理,张进江,钟大赉,等.鲁西地区沿古生界/太古宇不整合面滑脱构造的主要特征及形成机制[J].地质科学,2007,42(2):335-352
    [5]李理.鲁西地区晚中生代以来伸展构造与隆坳演化对比[D].北京:中科院地质与地球物理研究所,2006:1-108
    [6]王桂梁,曹代勇,姜波,等.华北南部的逆冲推覆伸展滑覆和重力滑动构造-兼论滑脱构造的研究方法[M].北京:中国矿业大学出版社,1992
    [7]王炳山,王西恩.鲁西伸展构造特征及其对煤矿生产的影响[J].煤田地质与勘探,2000,28(3):20-24
    [8]燕守勋,王桂梁,邵震杰,等.鲁西地壳隆升的伸展构造模式[J].地质学报,1996,70(1):1-11
    [9]吕朋菊,张明利,张永双,等.鲁西多层次多级别滑动构造系及其特征[J].岱宗学刊,1997,(4):1-7
    [10]李理,钟大赉,时秀朋,等.鲁西地区的滑脱构造及其形成的深部背景[J].自然科学进展2009,18(6):651-661
    [11]钱凯,王淑芬.济阳坳陷下第三系礁灰岩及礁灰岩油气藏[J].石油勘探与开发,1986,(5):1-6
    [12]曾允孚,田景春,赵志超,等.东营凹陷北带沙河街组砂砾岩体的成因类型及其储集性研究[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(1):1-10
    [13]任安身.从构造变动看济阳坳陷第三系各组段的接触关系[J].石油技术,1988,(2):1-7
    [14]任安身,杜公仅.济阳坳陷构造特征及油气勘探[A].中国含油气区构造特征[C],北京:石油工业出版社,1989:128-138
    [15]宗国洪,施央申,王秉海,等.济阳盆地中生代构造特征与油气[J].地质论评,1998,44(3):289-294
    [16]王国芝.济阳坳陷陈家庄-白庙地区构造成因及演化研究[D].山东东营:胜利油田博士后论文,2006:1-178
    [17]衣学磊,侯贵廷.济阳坳陷中、新生代断裂活动强度研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):504-509
    [18]郑德顺,吴智平,李伟.济阳坳陷中、新生代盆地转型期断裂特征及其对盆地的控制作用[J].地质学报,2005,79(3):386-394
    [19]张鹏,王良书,丁增勇,等.济阳坳陷中-新生代断裂发育特征及形成机制[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(4):467-474
    [20]丁增勇,王良书,张鹏,等.济阳坳陷及鲁西隆起区中、新生代伸展与断裂活动特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(1):107-112,140
    [21]Schultzs R A. Understanding the process of faulting: selected challenges and opportunities at the edge of the 21st century[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1999, 21: 985-993
    [22]Faccenna C., Nalpas T., Brun J. P., et al.The influences of pre-existing thrust faults on normal fault geometry in nature and in experiments[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1995, 17(8): 1139-1149
    [23]Higgins R I, Harris L B.The effect of cover composition on extensional faulting above re-activated basement faults: results from analogue modeling[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19(1): 89-98
    [24]Davis G A and Lister G S.Detachment fault in continental extension: Perspectives from the Southwestern U. S. Cordillera[J].Geol. Soc. America Special Paper, 1988,218: 133-159
    [25]马杏垣,索书田.论滑覆及岩石圈多层次滑脱构造[J].地质学报,1984,3:205-213
    [26]Wernicke, B. Low-angle normal faults in the Basin and Range Province: nappe tectonics in an extending orogen[J]. Nature, 1981, 291: 645-648
    [27]马杏垣.论伸展构造[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1982,7(3):15-22
    [28]朱志澄.伸展构造问题[J].中国地质,1992,(4):19-21
    [29]宋鸿林,单文琅,傅昭仁.论壳内韧性流层及其构造表现[J].现代地质,1992,6(4):494-503
    [30]朱志澄.变质核杂岩与伸展构造研究述评[J].地质科技情报,1994,3(13):1-7
    [31]朱志澄,韦必则,张旺生,等.构造地质学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1999:1-261
    [32]Eaton G P. The miocene great basin of western north America as an extending back-arc region[J]. Tectonophysics, 1984, 102(1-4): 275-295
    [33]Lister G S, Davis G A. The origin of metamorphic core complex and detachment faults formed during Tertiary continental extension in the northern Colorado River region[J]. Journal of structural geology, 1989, 11(1/2): 65-94
    [34]Lister G S, et al. Detachment fault and evolution of passive continental margins[J]. Geology, 1986, 14(3): 246-250
    [35]傅昭仁,李德威,李先福,等.变质核杂岩及剥离断层的控矿构造解析[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992:1-11
    [36]Bartley J M, Fletcher J M, Glazner A F. Tertiary extension and contraction of lowerplate rocks in the central Mojave metamorphic core complex, southern California[J]. Tectonics, 1990, (9): 521-534
    [37]Carmignani L, Kligfield R. Crustal extension in the Northern Apennines: The transition from compression to extension in the Alpi Apuane Core Complex[J]. Tectonics, 1990, (9): 1275-1303
    [38]Armstrong R L. Palemagnetic and radiometric evidence for the age of the Comores Islands, west central Indian Ocean[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1972, 16(2): 231-236
    [39]Suppe J. Principles of structural geology[M]. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice - Hall Inc, 1985: 280-288
    [40]Dennis J G.,闽嘉琪译.International Tectonic Dictionary [M].北京:地质出版社,1983:48
    [41]Ramsay J G, Huber M I.现代构造地质学方法,第二卷[M].徐树桐等译.北京:地质出版社,1991:222-229
    [42]许志琴.陆内俯冲及滑脱构造[J].地质论评,1986,32(1):79-89
    [43]王桂梁,王信,王文杰.滑脱构造研究-以闽西南二叠系含煤区为例[M].北京:科学出版社,1992
    [44]王桂梁,刘登桃,姜波,等.福建天湖山区推滑叠加型滑脱构造模式[J].中国科学(B辑),1995,25(1):85-92
    [45]蔡学林,吴德超,魏显贵.东秦岭造山带多重滑脱推覆与A型俯冲模式[J].成都理工学院学报,1994,21(1):1-10
    [46]Wernicke, B, Burchfiel B C.Modes of extensional tectonics[J].Journal of structural geology, 1982, (4): 105-115
    [47]漆家福,张一伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(增刊):1-6
    [48]山东地质局.山东省前晚第三纪基岩地质图说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,1983
    [49]中国科学院地质研究所山东地震地质考察小组.山东块断构造特征与地震带的初步划分[J].地质科学,1974,4:8-19
    [50]燕守勋.从盆地沉积和古构造分析鲁西中新生代地壳伸展史[J].中国区域地质,1994,(4):46-51
    [51]金振奎,刘泽容,石占中.鲁西地区断裂构造类型及其形成机制[J].石油大学学报,1999,23(5):1-5
    [52]田在艺,韩屏.渤海断陷盆地拉张量分析与油气潜力[J].石油学报,1990,11(2):1-12
    [53]颜丹平,田崇鲁,孟令波,等.伸展构造盆地的平衡剖面及其构造意义[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2003,28(3):275-280
    [54]刘池洋.从渤海湾盆地的地壳厚度演化论地壳差异扩展原理.见:华北克拉通沉积盆地的形成与演化及其油气赋存[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1990
    [55]陆克政,漆家福,戴俊生,等.渤海湾新生代含油气盆地构造模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1997:1-251
    [56]孙岩,陈述彭.地球系统科学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998:324-325
    [57]李德生.渤海湾含油气盆地的地质构造特征与油气田分布规律[J].海洋地质研究,1981,1:1-8
    [58]漆家福,杨桥,童亨茂,等.构造因素对半地堑盆地的层序充填的影响[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1997,22(6):603-608
    [59]吴智平,吕洪波.济阳坳陷中、新生代断裂发育、组合及演化关系[R].山东东营:胜利油田地科院科研报告,2004
    [60]陈海云,于建国,舒良树,等.济阳坳陷构造样式及其与油气关系[J].高校地质学报,2005,11(4):622-632
    [61]牛树银,胡华斌,毛景文,等.鲁西地区地质构造特征及其形成机制[J].中国地质,2004,31(1):34-38
    [62]吕朋菊,张明利,张永双.新构造运动与现今泰山的形成及其地貌景观[J].山东矿业学院学报,1995,14(4):331-335
    [63]李海玉,周东玲.新汶矿区多层次滑脱构造[J].中国煤田地质,1998,26(4):1-4
    [64]张永双,吕朋菊,张明利.鲁西煤田滑动构造与矿井灾害[J].中国煤田地质,1995,7(2):11-17
    [65]李理,钟大赉,时秀朋,等.鲁西地区晚中生代以来伸展构造及其控矿作用[J].地质论评,2008,54(4):449-458
    [66]李理,钟大赉,杨长春,等.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷滑脱构造研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(2):521-530
    [67]刘瑞斌.河北寿王坟铜矿成矿定年及同位素地球化学特征[D].北京:中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,2002
    [68]刘晓阳.锆石成因矿物学与锆石U-Pb测年在磁山花岗岩定年中的应用[D].天津:中钢集团天津地质研究院,2003
    [69]陈文寄.年轻地质体年代测定[M].北京:地震出版社,1991
    [70]李志昌,路远发,黄圭成.放射性同位素地质学方法与进展[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2004
    [71]常廷改.断层活动性评价中关于测年资料的引用[J].工程地质学报,2006,14(2):190-196
    [72]Van der Pluijm B. A., Hall C. M., Vrolijk P. J., et al.The dating of shallow faults in the Earth’s crust[J].Nature, 2001, 412(12): 172-174
    [73]杨坤光,梁兴中,谢建磊,等.ESR定年:一种确定脆性断层活动年龄的方法原理与应用[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(4):430-435
    [74]谢建磊,杨坤光,马昌前.湘西花垣-张家界断裂带构造变形特征与ESR定年[J].高校地质学报,2006,12(1):14-21
    [75]保增宽,袁万明,王世成,等.磷灰石(U-Th)/He定年技术及应用简介[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2005,24(2):126-132
    [76]Theo van Leeuwena, Charlotte M. Allenb, Ade Kadarusmanc, et al. Petrologic, isotopicand radiometric age constraints on the origin and tectonic history of the Malino Metamorphic Complex, NW Sulawesi, Indonesia [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2007, 29(5-6): 751-777
    [77]Laslett G M, Green P F, Duddy I R, et al. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 2.A quantitative analysis [J]. Chemical Geology, 1987, 65: 1-13
    [78]Zeffren S, Avigad D, Heimann A and Gvirtzman Z. Age resetting of hanging wall rocks above a low-angle detachment fault: Tinos Island (Aegean Sea)[J]. Tectonophysics, 2005, 400(1-4): 1-25
    [79]Zwingmann H, Mancktelow N. Timing of Alpine fault gouges[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 223(3-4): 415-425
    [80]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝,等.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275-282
    [81]宋明春,王沛成.山东省区域地质[M].山东:山东省地图出版社,2003
    [82]王椿镛,张先康,吴庆举.冀中坳陷内深地震反射剖面揭示的滑脱构造[J].科学通报,1994,39(7):625-628
    [83]宫洪波.济阳坳陷南部晚中生代以来滑脱构造研究[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2009
    [84]山东地矿局.山东省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1995
    [85]Kilsdonk M. A study in Extensional Tectonics[D]. USA: Texas A & M University, 1989
    [86]王先美,钟大赉,王毅.利用磷灰石裂变径迹约束脆性断裂活动的时限[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(5):1444-1455
    [87]王庆隆,万景林.用裂变径迹法研究断层活动年龄的初步探讨[J].地震地质,1988,10(4):199-205
    [88]万景林,王庆隆.郯庐断裂活动年龄及热历史的裂变径迹研究[J].地球学报,1997,18(增刊):74-76
    [89]郑家欣.裂变径迹年龄在断裂构造形迹中的应用[J].地震地质,1988,10(3):93-96
    [90]M A da Nobrega, J M Sa, F H R Bezerra et al. The use of apatite fission track thermochronology to constrain fault movements and sedimentary basin evolution in northeastern Brazil[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2005, 39: 627-633
    [91]Brichau S, Ring U, Ketcham R A et al. Constraining the long-term evolution of the sliprate for a major extensional fault system in the central Aegean, Greece, using thermochronology[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 241:293-306
    [92]Gleadow A J W, Duddy I R. Natural long-term annealing experiment for apatite [J]. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, 1981, 5: 169-174
    [93]康铁笙,王世成.地质热历史研究的裂变径迹法[M].北京:科学出版社,1991
    [94]Galbraith R F. On statistical models for fission track counts [J]. Journal of Mathematical Geology, 1981, 13:471-488
    [95]Yuan W M, Carter A, Dong J Q, et al. Mesozoic-Tertiary exhumation history of the Altai Mountains,northern Xinjiang, China: New constraints from apatite fission track data[J]. Tectonophysics, 2006, 412: 183-193
    [96]艾宪森,张成基,王世进.山东省十年区域地质调查工作新进展[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(3):228-235
    [97]Gleadow A J W, Duddy I R, Green P F, et al. Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1986, 94(4): 405-415
    [98]Gleandow A J W, Brown R W. Fisson track thermochronology and the long-term denudation response to tectonics. In: Summerfield MA(ed.)[J]. Germorphology and Global Tectonics. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2000, 57-75
    [99]Belton D X. TASC: Theory and application of the Track Age Spectra Calculation. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, 2005: 1-32
    [100]王振兰,王金铎,季建清,等.鲁西隆起与济阳坳陷箕状断陷形成时代研究[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):206-212
    [101]Gallagher K. Evolving temperature histories from apatite fission-track data[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1995, 136: 421-435
    [102]宋明水.济阳坳陷中、新生代成熟度曲线及其在剥蚀量计算中的运用[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(1):121-127
    [103]李理,钟大赉.泰山新生代抬升的裂变径迹证据[J].岩石学报,2006,22(2):547-464
    [104]张忠义.鲁西中新生代伸展构造研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2005:1-81
    [105]李守军,郑德顺,蔡进功,等.鲁北和鲁西南地区古近纪盆地沉积特征与控制因素探讨[J].地质论评,2003,49(3):225-232
    [106]王世进,张成基,杨恩秀,等.鲁西地区中生代侵入岩其次划分[J].山东国土资源,2009,25(2):18-23
    [107]林景仟,谭东娟,金烨.鲁西地区中生代火成活动的40Ar/39Ar年龄[J].岩石矿物学杂志,1996,15(3):213-220
    [108]邱检生,王德滋,周金城,等.山东中生代橄榄安粗岩系火山岩的地质、地球化学特征及岩石成因[J].地球科学,1996,21(5):546-552
    [109]许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.鲁西中生代闪长岩中两类幔源捕虏体的岩石学和地球化学[J].岩石学报,2003,19(4):623-636
    [110]裴福萍,许文良,王清海,等.鲁西费县中生代玄武岩及幔源捕虏晶的矿物化学-对岩石圈地慢性质的制约[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(1):88-97
    [111]杨承海,许文良,杨德彬,等.鲁西中生代高Mg闪长岩的成因:年代学与岩石地球化学证据[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2006,30(1):81-92
    [112]燕守勋.计算伸展断层底界面深度的作图法简介[J].地质科技情报,1992,11(2):83-87
    [113]刘代志.鲁西西部壳内物性界面计算及其应用[J].高校地质学报,1991,5(2):21-28
    [114]国家地震局深部物探成果编写组.中国地壳上地幔地球物理探测成果[M].地震出版社,1986
    [115]单宝忠.济阳坳陷边界断裂几何学特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(1):19-33
    [116]徐述平,杨立强,高邦飞.鲁西地区金矿类型及找矿方向[J].黄金科学技术,2007,15(5):18-23
    [117]于学峰,方宝明,韩作振.鲁西归来庄金矿田成矿系列及成矿作用研究[J].地质学报,2009,83(1):55-64
    [118]徐金方,石玉臣,刘长春,等.鲁西金矿成因类型、空间分布及其致矿地质异常[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,24(5):468-471
    [119]于建国,韩文功,王金铎.中国东部短线盆地中-新生代构造演化-以济阳坳陷为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:35-76
    [120]张旗,王焰,钱青,等.中国东部燕山期埃达克岩的特征及其构造-成矿意义[J].岩石学报,2001b,17(2):236-244
    [121]单家增.构造模拟实验在石油地质学中的应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
    [122]McClay K R. Extensional fault systems in sedimentary basins: a review of analogue model studies[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1990, 7: 206-233
    [123]Chemenda A I, Hurpin D, Tang J C, et al. Arc-continent collision and mechanism for the burial and exhumation of UHP/LT rocks constraints provided by experimental and numerical modeling[J]. Tectonophysics, 2001, 342: 137-161
    [124]周永胜,李建国,王绳祖,等.用物理模拟实验研究大陆伸展构造[J].地质力学学报,2002,8(2):141-148
    [125]周建勋,周建生.渤海湾盆地新生代构造变形机制:物理模拟和讨论[J].中国科学D辑(地球科学),2006,36(6):507-519
    [126]嵇少丞,钟大赉,许志琴,等.流变学:构造地质学和地球动力学的支柱学科[J].大地构造与成矿学,2008,32(3):257-264
    [127]单家增,张占文,肖乾华.辽河坳陷古近纪两期构造演化的构造物理模拟实验[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,3(31):14-17
    [128]McClay K, Bonora M. Analog models of restraining stopovers in strike-slip fault systems[J]. AAPG, 2001, 85(2):233-260
    [129]Giacomo Corti, et al. Magma-induced strain localization in centri-fuge models of transfer zones[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 348(2): 205-218
    [130]Marques F O, Cobbold P R. Topography as a major factor in the development of arcuate thrust belts:insights from sandbox experiments[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 348(2): 247-268
    [131]Byerlee J D. Friction of rocks[J]. Pure and Appllied Geophyscics, 1978, 116(4/5):615-626
    [132]周永胜.岩石圈构造变形的物理模拟实验研究现状[J].世界地质,1999,18(3):7-14
    [133]时秀朋,李理.鲁西隆起晚中生代以来伸展构造物理模拟[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):490-493
    [134]吕洪波,章雨旭,夏邦栋,等南盘江盆地中三叠统复理石中的同沉积挤压构造地质论评,2003,49(5):449-457
    [135]夏邦栋,李培军.中国东部扬子板块同华北板块在中-晚三叠世拼接的沉积学证据[J].沉积学报,1996,14(1):12-21
    [136]王同和,李洪革,张功成,等.渤海湾盆地构造演化与油气分布规律,中国含油气盆地构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999b:187-200
    [137]何海清,王兆云,韩品龙.华北地区构造演化对渤海湾油气形成和分布的控制[J].地质学报,1998,72(4):313-322
    [138]徐嘉炜,朱光,吕培基,等.郯庐断裂带平移年代学研究的进展[J].安徽地质,1995,5(1):1-12
    [139]翟明国,孟庆任,刘建明.华北东部中生代构造体制转折峰期的主要地质效应和形成动力学探讨[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):285-297
    [140]Northrup, C.J., Royden, L.H. & Burchfiel, B.C. Motion of the Pacific plate relative to Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extrusion along the eastern margin of Eurasia[J].Geology, 1995, 23: 719-722
    [141]徐纪人,赵志新,石川有三.中国大陆地壳应力场与构造运动区域特征研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(3):770-781
    [142]李三忠,王金铎,刘建忠,等.鲁西地块中生代构造格局及其形成背景[J].地质学报,2005,79(4):487-497
    [143]许文良,王清海,王冬艳,等.华北克拉通东部中生代岩石圈减薄的过程与机制:中生代火成岩和深源捕虏体证据[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):309-317
    [144]钟大赉,丁林.青藏高原的隆起过程及其机制探讨[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,26(4):289-295
    [145]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.陆相断陷湖盆T-R层序的特点及其控制因素[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):111-122

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700