准噶尔盆地滴南凸起二叠系梧桐沟组层序地层与岩性油气藏勘探
|
摘要
论文在对准噶尔盆地滴南凸起勘探现状分析的基础上,明确了岩性油气藏勘探存在的主要问题,利用滴南凸起所处良好的构造位置和区内丰富的三维地震、地质与测井资料,在提高地震分辨率处理基础上,建立了滴南凸起梧桐沟组高精度层序地层格架,结合多种先进的地球物理手段,落实了二叠系梧桐沟组梧一段的沉积相带展布及砂体预测,明确沉积层序对气藏的控制作用,总结了高精度层序地层学与岩性油气藏成藏模式,预测了有利含气区带,在对有利含气砂体进行追踪与成藏综合分析基础上,优选了有利钻探目标。论文主要成果如下:
(1)通过岩心、测井、地震以及分析化验等资料,建立了滴南凸起二叠系梧桐沟组层序地层格架,进一步对层序体系域进行了划分与对比,研究了沉积体系内的沉积相分布配置关系,揭示了探区主要气藏分布规律。研究区SQ_P3wt1高位体系域为主要产气层段,有利油气聚集区主要位于构造隆起区所发育的辫状三角洲前缘分流河道及河口砂坝上。
(2)根据已知油气点成藏要素分析认为,研究区存在构造-岩性复合油气藏和岩性油气藏两种类型。不整合界面和断层是油气运移的主控因素,是油气藏形成的先决条件,沉积相变引起的砂体变化是控制岩性油气藏的第二因素,油气优势运移通道指向有两类:断面附近优势运移通道指向区和斜坡区鼻梁优势运移通道指向区。
(3)在采取叠后混合相位反褶积的方法来拓展有效波的频带,使处理成果剖面分辨率明显提高,主频提高7Hz左右,频带宽度提高10-15Hz。不仅波组关系得到很好保持,而且小薄层振幅响应清晰呈现出来,充分挖掘了现有地震资料的潜力,满足了薄互层岩性油藏预测的需求。
(4)利用地震数据体扫描技术、三维可视化雕刻技术、反演数据体的砂体追踪技术、相模式约束下的有利砂体外推解释技术等手段对二叠系梧桐沟组目的层进行储层分析和预测工作。根据已知气层外推解释及预测二叠系梧桐沟组有利砂体5个,面积47.6km~2。其中梧一段已知砂体3块,面积30.0km~2,预测2块,面积17.6km~2;结合控藏要素、油气检测及油气分布规律研究,部署建议井位5口。
(5)滴南凸起岩性油气藏勘探首先应具有较高分辨率的三维地震资料,以三级层序体系域内的含油气砂组标定位为基础,充分利用先进的地球物理手段进行高精度的砂组沉积微相分析与预测,同时充分利用体雕刻技术、地层切片技术、地震属性技术、地震反演技术、油气检测技术等对有利含气砂体进行精细刻画和预测,结合油气成藏综合分析,优选有利岩性体,提出钻探目标。
On the basis of the analysis of current exploration in Dinan uplift of Junggar Basin, this paper clearly indicates the major problem of lithologic reservoir exploration. Dinan uplift locates at a good structure location, using the rich three-dimensional seismic, geological and well log data, and based on improving the seismic resolution, this paper established the high-resolution sequence stratigraphic framework of Wutonggou group in Dinan uplift. Combined with various advanced geophysical methods, this paper implements the sedimentary facies distribution and sand prediction of Permian Wutonggou group, clears the sedimentary sequence controlling the gas reservoir, summarizes high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and lithology hydrocarbon models, and predicts favorable gas zone. The favorable drilling targets are optimized on the basis of the favorable gas sand tracking and accumulation comprehensive analysis.The main results are as follows:
(1)Through the cores, well loggings, seismic, and analysis assay data, we establish the high-resolution sequence stratigraphic framework of Wutonggou group in Dinan uplift, and turn on the system tracts are divided and compared. We have studied the relation of sedimentary facies distribution within the sedimentary system, and revealed the main gas reservoir distribution. In this study area, SQ_P3wt1 high-stand systems tract is the main gas production segment. The main favorable hydrocarbon accumulation zones are mainly distributed in the distributary channel sand and distributary mouth bar of braided delta front at the tectonic uplift.
(2)According to the known analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation factor, there are structural-lithologic reservoir and lithologic reservoir in the study area. The unconformity surface and fault is the dominative factor of hydrocarbon migration, and is the prerequisite of the reservoir formation. The sedimentary facies change is the second factor controlling the lithologic reservoir in Dinan region. There are two kinds of dominant migration pathway piont areas: the point area near cross section and the point area in the nose zone of the slope area.
(3)Using the deconvolution method of post-stack mixed phase to develop effective wave frequency bands, the profile resolution is obviously improved, main frequency increasing about 7Hz ,and the bandwidth increasing 10-15Hz. The relations of wave group in profile resolution is well maintained, and the response of small thin layer amplitude is clearly shown. Those fully exploit the potential of seismic data, and satisfy the requirements of thin interbed lithologic reservoir prediction.
(4)Using seismic data scan technology, 3D-visualization carving, sand body tracking technology of inversion data, extrapolation interpretation of favorable sand under the restriction of the phase model and other technology are used to analyze and predict reservoir in wutonggou group. According to the known gas reservoir to explain and predict favorable gas sandbody in Permian Wutonggou group, five sand, area 46.6 km~2. Among them, there are known three sand ,area 30.0km~2, predicted two, area 17.6km~2. Combined with the elements of controlling reservoir, hydrocarbon detection and oil-gas distribution, the five proposed well locations are disposed.
(5)The high-resolution three-dimensional seismic data should be the primary condition in Lithologic reservoir exploration. On the basis of sand bed calibration in the three-order sequences system tract, we make full use of the advanced geophysical method for the analysis and prediction of sedimentary microfacies.we take full advantage of sandbody carving, strata slicing technology, seismic attributes, seismic inversion and hydrocarbon detection technology for the fine carving and prediction of favorable gas sand. Combined with comprehensive analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation, we optimize the favorable lithology body and drilling goal.
(1)通过岩心、测井、地震以及分析化验等资料,建立了滴南凸起二叠系梧桐沟组层序地层格架,进一步对层序体系域进行了划分与对比,研究了沉积体系内的沉积相分布配置关系,揭示了探区主要气藏分布规律。研究区SQ_P3wt1高位体系域为主要产气层段,有利油气聚集区主要位于构造隆起区所发育的辫状三角洲前缘分流河道及河口砂坝上。
(2)根据已知油气点成藏要素分析认为,研究区存在构造-岩性复合油气藏和岩性油气藏两种类型。不整合界面和断层是油气运移的主控因素,是油气藏形成的先决条件,沉积相变引起的砂体变化是控制岩性油气藏的第二因素,油气优势运移通道指向有两类:断面附近优势运移通道指向区和斜坡区鼻梁优势运移通道指向区。
(3)在采取叠后混合相位反褶积的方法来拓展有效波的频带,使处理成果剖面分辨率明显提高,主频提高7Hz左右,频带宽度提高10-15Hz。不仅波组关系得到很好保持,而且小薄层振幅响应清晰呈现出来,充分挖掘了现有地震资料的潜力,满足了薄互层岩性油藏预测的需求。
(4)利用地震数据体扫描技术、三维可视化雕刻技术、反演数据体的砂体追踪技术、相模式约束下的有利砂体外推解释技术等手段对二叠系梧桐沟组目的层进行储层分析和预测工作。根据已知气层外推解释及预测二叠系梧桐沟组有利砂体5个,面积47.6km~2。其中梧一段已知砂体3块,面积30.0km~2,预测2块,面积17.6km~2;结合控藏要素、油气检测及油气分布规律研究,部署建议井位5口。
(5)滴南凸起岩性油气藏勘探首先应具有较高分辨率的三维地震资料,以三级层序体系域内的含油气砂组标定位为基础,充分利用先进的地球物理手段进行高精度的砂组沉积微相分析与预测,同时充分利用体雕刻技术、地层切片技术、地震属性技术、地震反演技术、油气检测技术等对有利含气砂体进行精细刻画和预测,结合油气成藏综合分析,优选有利岩性体,提出钻探目标。
On the basis of the analysis of current exploration in Dinan uplift of Junggar Basin, this paper clearly indicates the major problem of lithologic reservoir exploration. Dinan uplift locates at a good structure location, using the rich three-dimensional seismic, geological and well log data, and based on improving the seismic resolution, this paper established the high-resolution sequence stratigraphic framework of Wutonggou group in Dinan uplift. Combined with various advanced geophysical methods, this paper implements the sedimentary facies distribution and sand prediction of Permian Wutonggou group, clears the sedimentary sequence controlling the gas reservoir, summarizes high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and lithology hydrocarbon models, and predicts favorable gas zone. The favorable drilling targets are optimized on the basis of the favorable gas sand tracking and accumulation comprehensive analysis.The main results are as follows:
(1)Through the cores, well loggings, seismic, and analysis assay data, we establish the high-resolution sequence stratigraphic framework of Wutonggou group in Dinan uplift, and turn on the system tracts are divided and compared. We have studied the relation of sedimentary facies distribution within the sedimentary system, and revealed the main gas reservoir distribution. In this study area, SQ_P3wt1 high-stand systems tract is the main gas production segment. The main favorable hydrocarbon accumulation zones are mainly distributed in the distributary channel sand and distributary mouth bar of braided delta front at the tectonic uplift.
(2)According to the known analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation factor, there are structural-lithologic reservoir and lithologic reservoir in the study area. The unconformity surface and fault is the dominative factor of hydrocarbon migration, and is the prerequisite of the reservoir formation. The sedimentary facies change is the second factor controlling the lithologic reservoir in Dinan region. There are two kinds of dominant migration pathway piont areas: the point area near cross section and the point area in the nose zone of the slope area.
(3)Using the deconvolution method of post-stack mixed phase to develop effective wave frequency bands, the profile resolution is obviously improved, main frequency increasing about 7Hz ,and the bandwidth increasing 10-15Hz. The relations of wave group in profile resolution is well maintained, and the response of small thin layer amplitude is clearly shown. Those fully exploit the potential of seismic data, and satisfy the requirements of thin interbed lithologic reservoir prediction.
(4)Using seismic data scan technology, 3D-visualization carving, sand body tracking technology of inversion data, extrapolation interpretation of favorable sand under the restriction of the phase model and other technology are used to analyze and predict reservoir in wutonggou group. According to the known gas reservoir to explain and predict favorable gas sandbody in Permian Wutonggou group, five sand, area 46.6 km~2. Among them, there are known three sand ,area 30.0km~2, predicted two, area 17.6km~2. Combined with the elements of controlling reservoir, hydrocarbon detection and oil-gas distribution, the five proposed well locations are disposed.
(5)The high-resolution three-dimensional seismic data should be the primary condition in Lithologic reservoir exploration. On the basis of sand bed calibration in the three-order sequences system tract, we make full use of the advanced geophysical method for the analysis and prediction of sedimentary microfacies.we take full advantage of sandbody carving, strata slicing technology, seismic attributes, seismic inversion and hydrocarbon detection technology for the fine carving and prediction of favorable gas sand. Combined with comprehensive analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation, we optimize the favorable lithology body and drilling goal.
引文
1.徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题[J].石油与天然气质,1997,18(2):83~89.
2.姜在兴,李华启,王留奇,等.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
3.纪友亮,张世奇,张宏,等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
4.邱荣华译.层序地层学译文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
5.游俊,郑浚茂,王德发.陆相层序地层学应用中几个问题的讨论[J].石油实验地质,1999, 21(2):104~109.
6.蔡希源,张名学.陆相盆地层序地层学研究中几个问题的探讨[J].现代地质,1999, 13(3):287~290.
7.张荣红,余素玉,邬金华.陆相湖盆中沉积物供给因素对层序地层分析的影响——以东营凹陷下第三系为例[J].地球科学,1997,22 (2):139~144.
8.刘贻军.前陆相盆地地层序地层学研究中的几个问题[J].地球学报,1998, 19(1):90~95.
9.王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型拗陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2002,27(6):683~688.
10.Daniel J. Miller and Kenneth A. Eriksson. Sequence stratigraphy of upper Mississipian artata in the central Appalachians: A record of glacioeustasy and tectonoceustasy in a foreland basin setting[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(2):210~233.
11.Uuis Ardevol, Juan Klimowitz, Jesus Malagen and J. C. Nagtegaal. Depositional sequence response to foreland deformation in the upper Cretaceous of the southern Pyrenees, Spain[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(3): 566~587.
12.陆永潮,任建业,李思田,等.伊通地堑的沉积充填序列及其对转换——伸展过程的响应[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):232~236.
13.Nancye H.Dawers and John R.Underhill.The role of fault interaction and linkage in controlling synrift stratigraphic sequence:Late Jurassic, Statfjor east area, northern North Sea[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(1):45~64.
14.马莉娟,何新贞,王淑玲,等.东营凹陷沉降史分析与构造充填演化[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(6):786~794.
15.Uwe Strecker, J. R. Steidtmann, and S. B. Smithson.A conceptual tectonos-tratigraphic model for seismic facies migration in a fluvio-lacus-trine extensional basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1999, 83(1):43~61.
16.O. V. Pinous N. Karogodin, S.V. Ershov and D. L. Sahagian. Sequence stratigraphy, facies, and sea level change of the Hauterivian complex, Priobskoe oil field (west Siberia)[J].AAPG Bulletin,1999, 83(6): 972~989.
17.John T. Wells, Christopher A. Scholz and Michael J. Soreghan. Processes of Sedimentation on a Lacustrine Border-Fault Margin: Interpretation of Cores From Lake Malawi, East Africa[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1999,69(2):816~831.
18.杨伟利,姜在兴,操应长,等.陆相断陷湖盆可容空间转换特征[J].沉积学报,2009,27 (2):299~305.
19.刘震,曾宪斌,张万选.构造掀斜对单断湖盆湖平面变化的影响[J].沉积学报,1997,15 (4):64~67.
20.廖远涛,王振升,肖敦清,等.黄骅坳陷中区古近系层序构成样式分析[J].地球学报,2008,29(2):221~227.
21.冯有良,李思田,解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):119~132.
22.严德天,王华,王清晨.中国东部第三系典型断陷盆地幕式构造旋回及层序地层特征[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):185~190.
23.胡受权.泌阳断陷陡坡带陆相层序发育的可容空间图解探讨[J].高校地质学报,1998,4 (3):85~94.
24. Jiang Zaixing, Lu Hongbo, Yu Wen-quan,et al.Transformation of accommodation space of the Cretaceous Qingshankou formation,the Songliao basin, NE China [J].Basin Research, 2005, 17 (4): 569~582.
25.操应长,姜在兴,夏斌.幕式差异沉降运动对断陷湖盆中湖平面和可容空间变化的影响[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4):323~327.
26徐怀大.层序地层学理论应用于我国断陷盆地分析中的问题.石油与天然气地质,1991,12(1)
27魏魁生,徐怀大.华北地区第三系层序地层特征.古潜山.1992.No1-2.
28魏魁生,徐怀大等.四川盆地层序地层学特征.石油与天然气地质. 1997,18(2)
29徐怀大,樊太亮等编著.新疆塔里木盆地层序地层学特征.北京地质出版社,1997
30李思田.层序地层分析与海平面变化研究.地质科技情报.1992,18(4)
31李思田,林畅松,等.含煤盆地层序地层分析的几个基本问题.煤田地质与勘探,1993,21(4):1-9
32李思田.试论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报,1993,10(4)
33解习农,李思田.陆相盆地层序地层研究特点.地质科技情报,1993,12(1)
34顾家裕.陆相层序地层学格架概念及模式.石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4)
35顾家裕主编.塔里木盆地沉积层序特征及演化.石油工业出版社,1996
36顾家裕等编.层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的应用.石油工业出版社,1997
37钱奕中.层序地层学理论和研究方法.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994
38李增学,李守春等.内陆表海含煤盆地层序地层学分析的思路与方法.石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):1-7
39李增学,魏久传等.华北南部晚古生代陆表海盆地层序地层格架与海平面变化.岩相古地理,1996,16(5):1-11
40李增学,余继峰等.含煤地层高分辨率层序地层研究的现状与展望.山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2001.20(4):8-13
41姜在兴,李华启等编著.层序地层学原理及应用.石油工业出版社,1996
42纪友亮等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.石油工业出版社,1996
43纪友亮,张世奇等编著.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式.地质出版社,1998
44朱筱敏等.东濮凹陷东南部下第三系层序地层学研究.石油勘探新近展国际研讨会论文集.张一伟等主编.石油工业出版社,1995
45朱筱敏.层序地层学原理及应用.石油工业出版社,1998
46朱筱敏,王贵文等.辽河滩海地区下第三系层序地层学研究.石油工业出版社,1999
47邓宏文,王洪亮等.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油天然气地质,1996,17(3)
48邓宏文,王洪亮等.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相的应用.石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2)
49邓宏文等.高分辨率层序地层学.石油工业出版社,2002
50蔡希源,李思田等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学-隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践(基础理论篇).地质出版社,2003
51.吴因业.吐哈盆地侏罗系含煤沉积层序特征研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):35~39.
52.陈开远,孙爱霞,杜宁平.成油体系中的层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1998, 19(3):221~226.
53.GERALD M. Friedman and John E. Sanders. Comments about the relationships between now ideas and geologic terms in stratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy with suggested modifications[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(9):1274~1280.
54.冯有良.阳信洼陷构造岩浆演化与油气聚集[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(2):173~179.
55.Ravnas R,Steel R J.Architecture of marine rift-basin successions[J].AAPG Bulletin,1998, 82(1):110~146.
56.任建业.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷S6′界面的构造变革意义[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2004,29(1):69~76.
57.K. E. Peters, J.W. Snedden, A. Sulaeman, J. F. Sarg and R. J. Enrico. A new Geochemical-sequence stratigraphy model for the Mahakam delta and Makassar slope, Kalimantar, Indonesia[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(1):12~44.
58.G. C. Nadon, J. A. (Toni) Simo,R. H. Dott, Jr. C. W. Byers. High-resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the St. Peter sandstone and Glenwood formation (middle Ordovician), Michigan basin, U. S. A[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(7):975~996.
59.胡孝林,李余生,郑荣才,等.高分辨率层序地层学的突破与发展[J].地质科技管理,1998,(1):51~53.
60.John P. Graham. Revised Stratigraphy, depositional systems and hydracarbon exploration potential for the lower Cretaceous Muddy sandstone, Northern Denver basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(2):183~209.
61.Hannes E. Leetaru.Sequence stratigraphy of the Aux Vases sandstone: A major oil producer in the Illinois basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(3): 399~422.
62.Mark G. Smith and R. Marc Bustin. Late Devonian and early Mississippian Bakken and Exhan black shale source rocks western Canada sedimentary basin: A sequence stratigraphic Interpretation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(7):940~960.
62.杨占龙,陈启林.关于吐哈盆地台北凹陷岩性油气藏勘探的几点思考[J].天然气地球科学, 2006,17(3):323~329.
63.袁明生,梁世君,燕列灿,等.吐哈盆地油气地质与勘探实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2002.
64.沈武显,樊太亮,于炳松,等.压性浅水湖盆沉积体系——以吐鲁番坳陷中下侏罗统为例[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009, 24(5):29~35.
65.徐论勋,李建民,李景义.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系烃源岩特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(2):13~14.
66.吴因业.吐哈盆地侏罗系含煤沉积层序特征研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):35~39.
67.吴因业,薛叔浩,应凤祥,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系储层沉积特征研究[J].新疆石油地质,1994,15(2):116~125.
68.张代生,李成明.吐哈盆地台北凹陷沉积体系变迁对油气分布的控制[ J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):71~75.
69.纪友亮,冷胜荣,陈丽华.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系沉积特征研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(6):8~15.
70.刘林玉,柳益群,李文厚,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷三角洲沉积与成岩作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):402~405.
71.刘亚明,薛良清,杨福忠,等.印尼J区块层序地层与沉积相特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008, 30(6):45~49.
72.樊太亮,李卫东.层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例[J].石油学报, 1999,20(2): 12~17.
73.徐强,姜烨等.中国层序地层学研究现状和发展方向.沉积学报,2003,21(1):155-168
74.冯友良,李思田等.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学地层模式.地学前缘,2000,7(3):119-132.
75.李思田.试论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报,1993,10(4)
76.吴因业.陆相盆地层序地层学分析的方法与实践.石油勘探与开发,1997,24(5):7-10
77. Xue Liangqing, Galloway W E. Genetic sequence stratigraphic framework, depositional style, and hydrocarbon occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN Formation in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China,AAPG,Bulletin,1993,(10):1792-1808
78.岳文浙等.陆盆层序地层研究的思路.地质论评,2000,46(4):347-354
79.谢渊等.陆相层序地层学研究进展与挑战.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):8-17
80.顾家裕,郭彬程等.中国陆相盆地层序地层格架及模式.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(5):11-15
81.朱筱敏,康安等.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨.沉积学报,2003,21(2):283-287
82.孟长生,何正怀等.准噶尔盆地二叠系及中生界划分对比[J].新疆石油地质, 2007,28(1):161-170.
83.尉远江,李德生等.准噶尔盆地西北缘扇体形成演化与扇体油气藏勘探[J].地球学报, 1992,13(2):62-71.
84.夏雨,陈世悦等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区二叠系层序地层特征研究[J].断块油气藏, 2008,15(1):18-21.
85.耳闯,王英民等.构造活动盆地层序地层特征与主控因素—以准噶尔盆地克-百地区二叠系为例[J].沉积学报, 2009,27(6):1101-1108.
86.陈磊,杨海波等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系天然气有利成藏条件及主控因素分析[J].石油地质, 2007,5:22-25.
87.吴孔友,查明等.准噶尔盆地二叠系不整合面及其油气运聚特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2002,29(2):53-57.
88.曹耀华、石新璞等.准噶尔盆地沙南地区二叠系梧桐沟组重力流沉积.新疆石油地质, 1999 ,20 (4) :320-324.
89.张塞、董雪梅等.准噶尔盆地沙南油田二叠系梧桐沟组高分辨率层序地层学应用研究.天然气工业, 2007 ,27 (增刊A) :483-485.
90.刘春慧、金振奎等.准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系梧桐沟组储层物性特征及控制因素.天然气地球科学, 2007 ,18 (3) :375-379.
91.林畅松,刘景彦等.高精度层序地层分析-建立沉积相与储层规模的等时地层格架.现代地质,2002,16(3):276-81
92.蔡忠贤,陈发景等.准噶尔盆地的类型和构造演化[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):431-440.
93.张年富,张越迁等.陆梁隆起断裂系统及其对油气运聚的控制作用.新疆石油地质,2003,24(4):281-283.
94.曲国胜,马宗晋等.论准噶尔盆地构造及其演化.新疆石油地质,2009,30(1):1-5.
95.牟永光.地震勘探数字处理方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981.
96.李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
97.余景奎.提高分辨率处理的几种途径[J].特种油气藏, 2005,12(5):38-41.
98.凌云研究组.基本地震属性在沉积环境解释中的应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(4):642-653
99.朱海龙.地震资料可视化解释的应用研究.石油物探译丛,1995,5
100.段文烨等.三维可视化在气藏中的应用.石油物探,2000,39(增刊):173-176
101.袁国芬等.三维可视化在塔河油田的的应用,石油物探,2000, Vol 18(2)
104.李明,候连华等.岩性地层油气藏地球物理勘探技术与应用.石油工业出版社,2005.
105.邹才能,贾承造等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏动力与分布规律.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):125-130.
106.吴亚东,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏规律.新疆石油地质,2006,27(1):19-22.
107.于京波,潘红卫等.松辽盆地南部岩性圈闭识别技术及效果.石油地球物理勘探,2006,Vol(11),增刊,57-61.
2.姜在兴,李华启,王留奇,等.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
3.纪友亮,张世奇,张宏,等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
4.邱荣华译.层序地层学译文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
5.游俊,郑浚茂,王德发.陆相层序地层学应用中几个问题的讨论[J].石油实验地质,1999, 21(2):104~109.
6.蔡希源,张名学.陆相盆地层序地层学研究中几个问题的探讨[J].现代地质,1999, 13(3):287~290.
7.张荣红,余素玉,邬金华.陆相湖盆中沉积物供给因素对层序地层分析的影响——以东营凹陷下第三系为例[J].地球科学,1997,22 (2):139~144.
8.刘贻军.前陆相盆地地层序地层学研究中的几个问题[J].地球学报,1998, 19(1):90~95.
9.王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型拗陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2002,27(6):683~688.
10.Daniel J. Miller and Kenneth A. Eriksson. Sequence stratigraphy of upper Mississipian artata in the central Appalachians: A record of glacioeustasy and tectonoceustasy in a foreland basin setting[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(2):210~233.
11.Uuis Ardevol, Juan Klimowitz, Jesus Malagen and J. C. Nagtegaal. Depositional sequence response to foreland deformation in the upper Cretaceous of the southern Pyrenees, Spain[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(3): 566~587.
12.陆永潮,任建业,李思田,等.伊通地堑的沉积充填序列及其对转换——伸展过程的响应[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):232~236.
13.Nancye H.Dawers and John R.Underhill.The role of fault interaction and linkage in controlling synrift stratigraphic sequence:Late Jurassic, Statfjor east area, northern North Sea[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(1):45~64.
14.马莉娟,何新贞,王淑玲,等.东营凹陷沉降史分析与构造充填演化[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(6):786~794.
15.Uwe Strecker, J. R. Steidtmann, and S. B. Smithson.A conceptual tectonos-tratigraphic model for seismic facies migration in a fluvio-lacus-trine extensional basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1999, 83(1):43~61.
16.O. V. Pinous
17.John T. Wells, Christopher A. Scholz and Michael J. Soreghan. Processes of Sedimentation on a Lacustrine Border-Fault Margin: Interpretation of Cores From Lake Malawi, East Africa[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1999,69(2):816~831.
18.杨伟利,姜在兴,操应长,等.陆相断陷湖盆可容空间转换特征[J].沉积学报,2009,27 (2):299~305.
19.刘震,曾宪斌,张万选.构造掀斜对单断湖盆湖平面变化的影响[J].沉积学报,1997,15 (4):64~67.
20.廖远涛,王振升,肖敦清,等.黄骅坳陷中区古近系层序构成样式分析[J].地球学报,2008,29(2):221~227.
21.冯有良,李思田,解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):119~132.
22.严德天,王华,王清晨.中国东部第三系典型断陷盆地幕式构造旋回及层序地层特征[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):185~190.
23.胡受权.泌阳断陷陡坡带陆相层序发育的可容空间图解探讨[J].高校地质学报,1998,4 (3):85~94.
24. Jiang Zaixing, Lu Hongbo, Yu Wen-quan,et al.Transformation of accommodation space of the Cretaceous Qingshankou formation,the Songliao basin, NE China [J].Basin Research, 2005, 17 (4): 569~582.
25.操应长,姜在兴,夏斌.幕式差异沉降运动对断陷湖盆中湖平面和可容空间变化的影响[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4):323~327.
26徐怀大.层序地层学理论应用于我国断陷盆地分析中的问题.石油与天然气地质,1991,12(1)
27魏魁生,徐怀大.华北地区第三系层序地层特征.古潜山.1992.No1-2.
28魏魁生,徐怀大等.四川盆地层序地层学特征.石油与天然气地质. 1997,18(2)
29徐怀大,樊太亮等编著.新疆塔里木盆地层序地层学特征.北京地质出版社,1997
30李思田.层序地层分析与海平面变化研究.地质科技情报.1992,18(4)
31李思田,林畅松,等.含煤盆地层序地层分析的几个基本问题.煤田地质与勘探,1993,21(4):1-9
32李思田.试论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报,1993,10(4)
33解习农,李思田.陆相盆地层序地层研究特点.地质科技情报,1993,12(1)
34顾家裕.陆相层序地层学格架概念及模式.石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4)
35顾家裕主编.塔里木盆地沉积层序特征及演化.石油工业出版社,1996
36顾家裕等编.层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的应用.石油工业出版社,1997
37钱奕中.层序地层学理论和研究方法.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994
38李增学,李守春等.内陆表海含煤盆地层序地层学分析的思路与方法.石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):1-7
39李增学,魏久传等.华北南部晚古生代陆表海盆地层序地层格架与海平面变化.岩相古地理,1996,16(5):1-11
40李增学,余继峰等.含煤地层高分辨率层序地层研究的现状与展望.山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2001.20(4):8-13
41姜在兴,李华启等编著.层序地层学原理及应用.石油工业出版社,1996
42纪友亮等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.石油工业出版社,1996
43纪友亮,张世奇等编著.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式.地质出版社,1998
44朱筱敏等.东濮凹陷东南部下第三系层序地层学研究.石油勘探新近展国际研讨会论文集.张一伟等主编.石油工业出版社,1995
45朱筱敏.层序地层学原理及应用.石油工业出版社,1998
46朱筱敏,王贵文等.辽河滩海地区下第三系层序地层学研究.石油工业出版社,1999
47邓宏文,王洪亮等.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油天然气地质,1996,17(3)
48邓宏文,王洪亮等.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相的应用.石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2)
49邓宏文等.高分辨率层序地层学.石油工业出版社,2002
50蔡希源,李思田等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学-隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践(基础理论篇).地质出版社,2003
51.吴因业.吐哈盆地侏罗系含煤沉积层序特征研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):35~39.
52.陈开远,孙爱霞,杜宁平.成油体系中的层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1998, 19(3):221~226.
53.GERALD M. Friedman and John E. Sanders. Comments about the relationships between now ideas and geologic terms in stratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy with suggested modifications[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(9):1274~1280.
54.冯有良.阳信洼陷构造岩浆演化与油气聚集[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(2):173~179.
55.Ravnas R,Steel R J.Architecture of marine rift-basin successions[J].AAPG Bulletin,1998, 82(1):110~146.
56.任建业.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷S6′界面的构造变革意义[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2004,29(1):69~76.
57.K. E. Peters, J.W. Snedden, A. Sulaeman, J. F. Sarg and R. J. Enrico. A new Geochemical-sequence stratigraphy model for the Mahakam delta and Makassar slope, Kalimantar, Indonesia[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(1):12~44.
58.G. C. Nadon, J. A. (Toni) Simo,R. H. Dott, Jr. C. W. Byers. High-resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the St. Peter sandstone and Glenwood formation (middle Ordovician), Michigan basin, U. S. A[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(7):975~996.
59.胡孝林,李余生,郑荣才,等.高分辨率层序地层学的突破与发展[J].地质科技管理,1998,(1):51~53.
60.John P. Graham. Revised Stratigraphy, depositional systems and hydracarbon exploration potential for the lower Cretaceous Muddy sandstone, Northern Denver basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(2):183~209.
61.Hannes E. Leetaru.Sequence stratigraphy of the Aux Vases sandstone: A major oil producer in the Illinois basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000, 84(3): 399~422.
62.Mark G. Smith and R. Marc Bustin. Late Devonian and early Mississippian Bakken and Exhan black shale source rocks western Canada sedimentary basin: A sequence stratigraphic Interpretation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(7):940~960.
62.杨占龙,陈启林.关于吐哈盆地台北凹陷岩性油气藏勘探的几点思考[J].天然气地球科学, 2006,17(3):323~329.
63.袁明生,梁世君,燕列灿,等.吐哈盆地油气地质与勘探实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2002.
64.沈武显,樊太亮,于炳松,等.压性浅水湖盆沉积体系——以吐鲁番坳陷中下侏罗统为例[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009, 24(5):29~35.
65.徐论勋,李建民,李景义.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系烃源岩特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(2):13~14.
66.吴因业.吐哈盆地侏罗系含煤沉积层序特征研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):35~39.
67.吴因业,薛叔浩,应凤祥,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系储层沉积特征研究[J].新疆石油地质,1994,15(2):116~125.
68.张代生,李成明.吐哈盆地台北凹陷沉积体系变迁对油气分布的控制[ J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):71~75.
69.纪友亮,冷胜荣,陈丽华.吐哈盆地台北凹陷侏罗系沉积特征研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(6):8~15.
70.刘林玉,柳益群,李文厚,等.吐哈盆地台北凹陷三角洲沉积与成岩作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):402~405.
71.刘亚明,薛良清,杨福忠,等.印尼J区块层序地层与沉积相特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008, 30(6):45~49.
72.樊太亮,李卫东.层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例[J].石油学报, 1999,20(2): 12~17.
73.徐强,姜烨等.中国层序地层学研究现状和发展方向.沉积学报,2003,21(1):155-168
74.冯友良,李思田等.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学地层模式.地学前缘,2000,7(3):119-132.
75.李思田.试论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报,1993,10(4)
76.吴因业.陆相盆地层序地层学分析的方法与实践.石油勘探与开发,1997,24(5):7-10
77. Xue Liangqing, Galloway W E. Genetic sequence stratigraphic framework, depositional style, and hydrocarbon occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN Formation in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China,AAPG,Bulletin,1993,(10):1792-1808
78.岳文浙等.陆盆层序地层研究的思路.地质论评,2000,46(4):347-354
79.谢渊等.陆相层序地层学研究进展与挑战.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):8-17
80.顾家裕,郭彬程等.中国陆相盆地层序地层格架及模式.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(5):11-15
81.朱筱敏,康安等.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨.沉积学报,2003,21(2):283-287
82.孟长生,何正怀等.准噶尔盆地二叠系及中生界划分对比[J].新疆石油地质, 2007,28(1):161-170.
83.尉远江,李德生等.准噶尔盆地西北缘扇体形成演化与扇体油气藏勘探[J].地球学报, 1992,13(2):62-71.
84.夏雨,陈世悦等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区二叠系层序地层特征研究[J].断块油气藏, 2008,15(1):18-21.
85.耳闯,王英民等.构造活动盆地层序地层特征与主控因素—以准噶尔盆地克-百地区二叠系为例[J].沉积学报, 2009,27(6):1101-1108.
86.陈磊,杨海波等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系天然气有利成藏条件及主控因素分析[J].石油地质, 2007,5:22-25.
87.吴孔友,查明等.准噶尔盆地二叠系不整合面及其油气运聚特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2002,29(2):53-57.
88.曹耀华、石新璞等.准噶尔盆地沙南地区二叠系梧桐沟组重力流沉积.新疆石油地质, 1999 ,20 (4) :320-324.
89.张塞、董雪梅等.准噶尔盆地沙南油田二叠系梧桐沟组高分辨率层序地层学应用研究.天然气工业, 2007 ,27 (增刊A) :483-485.
90.刘春慧、金振奎等.准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系梧桐沟组储层物性特征及控制因素.天然气地球科学, 2007 ,18 (3) :375-379.
91.林畅松,刘景彦等.高精度层序地层分析-建立沉积相与储层规模的等时地层格架.现代地质,2002,16(3):276-81
92.蔡忠贤,陈发景等.准噶尔盆地的类型和构造演化[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):431-440.
93.张年富,张越迁等.陆梁隆起断裂系统及其对油气运聚的控制作用.新疆石油地质,2003,24(4):281-283.
94.曲国胜,马宗晋等.论准噶尔盆地构造及其演化.新疆石油地质,2009,30(1):1-5.
95.牟永光.地震勘探数字处理方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981.
96.李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
97.余景奎.提高分辨率处理的几种途径[J].特种油气藏, 2005,12(5):38-41.
98.凌云研究组.基本地震属性在沉积环境解释中的应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(4):642-653
99.朱海龙.地震资料可视化解释的应用研究.石油物探译丛,1995,5
100.段文烨等.三维可视化在气藏中的应用.石油物探,2000,39(增刊):173-176
101.袁国芬等.三维可视化在塔河油田的的应用,石油物探,2000, Vol 18(2)
104.李明,候连华等.岩性地层油气藏地球物理勘探技术与应用.石油工业出版社,2005.
105.邹才能,贾承造等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏动力与分布规律.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):125-130.
106.吴亚东,赵文智等.松辽盆地南部岩性-地层油气藏成藏规律.新疆石油地质,2006,27(1):19-22.
107.于京波,潘红卫等.松辽盆地南部岩性圈闭识别技术及效果.石油地球物理勘探,2006,Vol(11),增刊,57-61.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |