不同胚乳类型玉米籽粒品质形成机理及调控研究
|
摘要
本研究于1999~2002年采用大田试验和室内生理、生化分析相结合的技术路线，在搜集、种植大量不同胚乳类型玉米品种并根据产量和品质兼顾的原则筛选出代表性品种的基础上，对糯质型、甜质型、爆裂型和普通型玉米籽粒的品质特性及籽粒发育过程中相关酶活性的动态变化进行系统的比较研究，通过盆栽试验研究了氮、钾对其品质的影响，总结得出了品质特性的差异及其形成机理，并探讨了氮、钾对其品质的调控。研究结果如下：
1 不同胚乳类型玉米籽粒品质特性的差异
四种类型玉米籽粒中存在的糖有WSP、蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖、甘露醇和山梨醇，但不存在麦芽糖。籽粒中存在两种WSP，其保留时间分别为5.28min和5.98min。甜质型玉米籽粒可以积累较多的糖，而且籽粒中WSP的含量明显高于其它类型玉米。随着籽粒的发育，糖的组成在类型间产生差异。
四种类型玉米籽粒中均存在支链和直链淀粉，在胚中两种淀粉组分均存在，而胚乳中的淀粉糯质型为支链淀粉，其它类型中则含有支链和直链两种淀粉。甜质型玉米积累的总淀粉明显少于其它类型，四种类型玉米总淀粉含量均随籽粒的发育而增加。甜质型和糯质型玉米直链淀粉含量较低，而且随籽粒的发育而下降，爆裂型和普通型玉米籽粒则相反。
甜质型籽粒的总氨基酸含量和必需氨基酸含量在籽粒鲜食期低于普通型，但必需氨基酸占总氨基酸的比例较高。爆裂型玉米籽粒的总氨基酸含量和必需氨基酸含量最高，籽粒发育后期必需氨基酸所占的比例最高。籽粒氨基酸品质的首要限制因素为LYS的缺乏，但是次要因素则因类型和生育时期而异。
鲜食期，甜质型和糯质型玉米籽粒的蛋白质品质要优于普通型玉米。爆裂型玉米籽粒中可以积累较多的蛋白质，而且必需氨基酸含量和蛋白质的效力比值也优于其它类型玉米。
1.2 四种类型玉米籽粒品质差异的主要机理
在四种类型玉米籽粒中蔗糖合成酶（合成方向）在蔗糖合成的过程中起主导作用。籽粒发育过程中，蔗糖合成酶（合成方向）的平均活性表现为爆裂型>甜质型>普通型>糯质型。而磷酸蔗糖合成酶的平均活性则表现为：甜质型>爆裂型>糯质型>普通型。甜质型玉米籽粒具有较高的蔗糖合成能力。
籽粒中蔗糖的降解主要依靠蔗糖合成酶（降解方向），而蔗糖酶在蔗糖降解过程中起的作用较小。籽粒发育过程中，蔗糖合成酶（降解方向）平均酶活性：甜质型>普通型>糯质型>爆裂型；而蔗糖酶活性则表现为：爆裂型>糯质型>普通型>甜质型。甜质型玉米籽粒蔗糖积累较多的原因主要得益于蔗糖合成能力的增加，而非降解量的减少。
玉米籽粒中UDPG－PPase酶活性要高于ADPG－PPase。ADPG－PPase平均酶活性：糯质型>爆裂型>普通型>甜质型。UDPG－PPase平均酶活性：爆裂型> 糯质型>甜质型>普通型。SSS的酶活性低于GBSS。SSS和GBSS的平均酶活性均表现为普通型>爆裂型>甜质型>糯质型。糯质型籽粒直链淀粉含量低的主要原因是较低的GBSS活性。甜质型玉米籽粒淀粉含量降低是由于SSS、GBSS和SDE活性降低综合作用的结果。
1.3 氮肥对籽粒品质的影响
氮对不同胚乳类型玉米可溶性糖含量的影响不同，对糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米可以提高籽粒可溶性总糖含量，爆裂型玉米则降低。对各糖组分含量的影响也不同：施用氮素后蔗糖、甘露醇和山梨醇含量四种类型玉米均较对照升高；甜质型玉米施氮后不含山梨醇的时间缩短；甜质型、爆裂型和普通型玉米WSP含量较对照增加；施氮后糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米的葡萄糖及果糖含量增加，爆裂型玉米降低。
氮素对总淀粉含量的影响也因类型而异，施氮提高了糯质型和普通型玉米总淀粉含量，降低了甜质型和爆裂型的含量。施氮后，四种类型玉米直链淀粉含量均提高；而糯质型、普通型支链淀粉含量提高，甜质型和爆裂型则降低。
施氮后四种类型玉米籽粒的总氨基酸和必需氨基酸含量均显著增加。氮肥对糯质型、甜质型的氨基酸品质有鲜食期改善，后期降低的双重作用；对爆裂型和普通型玉米则存在单一的负作用。
施氮后四种类型玉米蛋白质的相对含量和绝对含量均增加。氮对蛋白质品质的影响因类型而异，甜质型玉米施氮后籽粒发育前中期蛋白质效力比值高于对照，而后期低于对照；其它三种类型籽粒施用氮素后蛋白质效力比值则均高于对照。
氮肥提高了糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米蔗糖的降解能力，对爆裂型玉米却有降低作用。氮肥提高了糯质型、甜质型和爆裂型ADPG－PPase和UDPG－PPase活性，只降低了普通型玉米籽粒的ADPG－PPase活性。四种类型玉米SSS活性氮素处理均低于对照，而糯质型、普通型的GBSS活性氮素处理高于对照。
1.4 钾肥对籽粒品质的影响
施钾后，四种类型玉米籽粒的可溶性总糖含量较对照均有显著增加；其中WSP、蔗糖及山梨醇含量钾素处理均显著高于对照；葡萄糖和甘露醇含量，糯质型玉米钾素处理低于对照，其它三种类型则高于对照；果糖含量，糯质型和爆裂型玉米钾素处理低于对照，而甜质型和普通型则高于对照。
施钾后，糯质型和普通型玉米的淀粉含量增加，而甜质型、爆裂型玉米降低。施钾降低了糯质型和甜质型直链淀粉含量，而爆裂型和普通型则升高；支链淀粉含
In order to learn the formative mechanisms of quality of different endosperm type maize (waxy, sweet, pop and normal) grain and their regulations, field culture and pot culture were carried out in the corn research garden of Shandong Agriculture University from 1999 to 2002. The results were as follows:
1 The different characteristics of quality of four type maize grain
There are WSP, sucrose, glucose, fructose, mannitol and sorbitol in the developments of four endosperm type maize grains, but no maltose were detected. Two types of WSP with different D.P.N. were detected in the grains; their retention times are 5.28 and 5.98 min. The sugar and WSP content are higher in sweet corn grain than other types. With the development of maize grain, the components of sugars in different endosperm type maize grain are different.
There are both amylose and amylopectin in different endosperm type maize grains. Both of them were detected in the embryo, but only amylopectin exist in the waxy corn endosperm. Sweet corn accumulated less starch than other type. The content of total starch in different endosperm type maize grain increased with the development of the grain. The contents of amylose in waxy and sweet corn are lower than other types . With the developments of the grain, the contents of amylose in waxy and sweet corn decreased, but in pop and normal corn it increased.
The contents of total amino acids and essential amino acids in fresh period of waxy and sweet corn grain is lower than normal corn, but the percent of essential amino acids in total amino acids is higher than normal corn. In Pop corn grain they are highest in four types. In different endosperm type maize grain, the shorting of LYS is the first limiting factor, but the second is different.
In fresh period, the quality of protein in waxy and sweet corn grain is excelled than other types. Pop corn grain can accumulated more protein than others, and the protein efficient rate is higher than others.
2 The difference of formative mechanisms in different endosperm type maize grain
In process of sucrose synthesis, SS (synthesis) have dominant function in four type maize grains. In the development of grain, the average activities of SS in pop corn> sweet corn>normal corn>waxy corn. The average of SPS activities in sweet corn>pop corn>waxy corn>normal corn. The ability of sucrose synthesis in sweet corn is higher than others.
The degradation of sucrose is mainly depending on the SS (degradation) activity, and the effect of invertase is lower than SS. In the development of grain, the average activity of sweet corn grain > normal corn >waxy corn >pop corn, and invertase activity of pop corn > waxy corn >normal corn > sweet corn. The reason of more sugars in sweet corn grain is the increasing of ability of sucrose synthesis but not the decreasing of degradation of sucrose.
In different endosperm type maize grain, the activities of UDPG-PPase are higher than ADPG-PPase, SSS are higher than GBSS. The average activities of ADPG-PPase: wax corn >pop corn >normal corn >sweet corn, but the average activities of UDPG-PPase expressed as pop corn >waxy corn >sweet corn >normal corn. Both SSS and GBSS activities of normal corn >pop corn >sweet corn> waxy corn. Low activities of GBSS lead to the low content of amylose in waxy corn, and the intergrated effects of activities decrease of SSS, GBSS and SDE resulted in the lower starch content in sweet corn.
3 The effect of nitrogen on the quality of different endosperm type maize grain
The influences of nitrogen to the total soluble sugar content are different in different endosperm type maize grain. Nitrogen can improve the total soluble sugar content in waxy, sweet and normal corn, but decreased it in pop corn. The functions of nitrogen on different sugar components are different. Sucrose, mannitol and sorbitol content increased in four types maize grain after applied nitrogen. The time of no consistence of sorbitol in nitrogen treatment of sweet corn is shorter than control. The WSP content of sweet, pop
1 不同胚乳类型玉米籽粒品质特性的差异
四种类型玉米籽粒中存在的糖有WSP、蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖、甘露醇和山梨醇，但不存在麦芽糖。籽粒中存在两种WSP，其保留时间分别为5.28min和5.98min。甜质型玉米籽粒可以积累较多的糖，而且籽粒中WSP的含量明显高于其它类型玉米。随着籽粒的发育，糖的组成在类型间产生差异。
四种类型玉米籽粒中均存在支链和直链淀粉，在胚中两种淀粉组分均存在，而胚乳中的淀粉糯质型为支链淀粉，其它类型中则含有支链和直链两种淀粉。甜质型玉米积累的总淀粉明显少于其它类型，四种类型玉米总淀粉含量均随籽粒的发育而增加。甜质型和糯质型玉米直链淀粉含量较低，而且随籽粒的发育而下降，爆裂型和普通型玉米籽粒则相反。
甜质型籽粒的总氨基酸含量和必需氨基酸含量在籽粒鲜食期低于普通型，但必需氨基酸占总氨基酸的比例较高。爆裂型玉米籽粒的总氨基酸含量和必需氨基酸含量最高，籽粒发育后期必需氨基酸所占的比例最高。籽粒氨基酸品质的首要限制因素为LYS的缺乏，但是次要因素则因类型和生育时期而异。
鲜食期，甜质型和糯质型玉米籽粒的蛋白质品质要优于普通型玉米。爆裂型玉米籽粒中可以积累较多的蛋白质，而且必需氨基酸含量和蛋白质的效力比值也优于其它类型玉米。
1.2 四种类型玉米籽粒品质差异的主要机理
在四种类型玉米籽粒中蔗糖合成酶（合成方向）在蔗糖合成的过程中起主导作用。籽粒发育过程中，蔗糖合成酶（合成方向）的平均活性表现为爆裂型>甜质型>普通型>糯质型。而磷酸蔗糖合成酶的平均活性则表现为：甜质型>爆裂型>糯质型>普通型。甜质型玉米籽粒具有较高的蔗糖合成能力。
籽粒中蔗糖的降解主要依靠蔗糖合成酶（降解方向），而蔗糖酶在蔗糖降解过程中起的作用较小。籽粒发育过程中，蔗糖合成酶（降解方向）平均酶活性：甜质型>普通型>糯质型>爆裂型；而蔗糖酶活性则表现为：爆裂型>糯质型>普通型>甜质型。甜质型玉米籽粒蔗糖积累较多的原因主要得益于蔗糖合成能力的增加，而非降解量的减少。
玉米籽粒中UDPG－PPase酶活性要高于ADPG－PPase。ADPG－PPase平均酶活性：糯质型>爆裂型>普通型>甜质型。UDPG－PPase平均酶活性：爆裂型> 糯质型>甜质型>普通型。SSS的酶活性低于GBSS。SSS和GBSS的平均酶活性均表现为普通型>爆裂型>甜质型>糯质型。糯质型籽粒直链淀粉含量低的主要原因是较低的GBSS活性。甜质型玉米籽粒淀粉含量降低是由于SSS、GBSS和SDE活性降低综合作用的结果。
1.3 氮肥对籽粒品质的影响
氮对不同胚乳类型玉米可溶性糖含量的影响不同，对糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米可以提高籽粒可溶性总糖含量，爆裂型玉米则降低。对各糖组分含量的影响也不同：施用氮素后蔗糖、甘露醇和山梨醇含量四种类型玉米均较对照升高；甜质型玉米施氮后不含山梨醇的时间缩短；甜质型、爆裂型和普通型玉米WSP含量较对照增加；施氮后糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米的葡萄糖及果糖含量增加，爆裂型玉米降低。
氮素对总淀粉含量的影响也因类型而异，施氮提高了糯质型和普通型玉米总淀粉含量，降低了甜质型和爆裂型的含量。施氮后，四种类型玉米直链淀粉含量均提高；而糯质型、普通型支链淀粉含量提高，甜质型和爆裂型则降低。
施氮后四种类型玉米籽粒的总氨基酸和必需氨基酸含量均显著增加。氮肥对糯质型、甜质型的氨基酸品质有鲜食期改善，后期降低的双重作用；对爆裂型和普通型玉米则存在单一的负作用。
施氮后四种类型玉米蛋白质的相对含量和绝对含量均增加。氮对蛋白质品质的影响因类型而异，甜质型玉米施氮后籽粒发育前中期蛋白质效力比值高于对照，而后期低于对照；其它三种类型籽粒施用氮素后蛋白质效力比值则均高于对照。
氮肥提高了糯质型、甜质型和普通型玉米蔗糖的降解能力，对爆裂型玉米却有降低作用。氮肥提高了糯质型、甜质型和爆裂型ADPG－PPase和UDPG－PPase活性，只降低了普通型玉米籽粒的ADPG－PPase活性。四种类型玉米SSS活性氮素处理均低于对照，而糯质型、普通型的GBSS活性氮素处理高于对照。
1.4 钾肥对籽粒品质的影响
施钾后，四种类型玉米籽粒的可溶性总糖含量较对照均有显著增加；其中WSP、蔗糖及山梨醇含量钾素处理均显著高于对照；葡萄糖和甘露醇含量，糯质型玉米钾素处理低于对照，其它三种类型则高于对照；果糖含量，糯质型和爆裂型玉米钾素处理低于对照，而甜质型和普通型则高于对照。
施钾后，糯质型和普通型玉米的淀粉含量增加，而甜质型、爆裂型玉米降低。施钾降低了糯质型和甜质型直链淀粉含量，而爆裂型和普通型则升高；支链淀粉含
In order to learn the formative mechanisms of quality of different endosperm type maize (waxy, sweet, pop and normal) grain and their regulations, field culture and pot culture were carried out in the corn research garden of Shandong Agriculture University from 1999 to 2002. The results were as follows:
1 The different characteristics of quality of four type maize grain
There are WSP, sucrose, glucose, fructose, mannitol and sorbitol in the developments of four endosperm type maize grains, but no maltose were detected. Two types of WSP with different D.P.N. were detected in the grains; their retention times are 5.28 and 5.98 min. The sugar and WSP content are higher in sweet corn grain than other types. With the development of maize grain, the components of sugars in different endosperm type maize grain are different.
There are both amylose and amylopectin in different endosperm type maize grains. Both of them were detected in the embryo, but only amylopectin exist in the waxy corn endosperm. Sweet corn accumulated less starch than other type. The content of total starch in different endosperm type maize grain increased with the development of the grain. The contents of amylose in waxy and sweet corn are lower than other types . With the developments of the grain, the contents of amylose in waxy and sweet corn decreased, but in pop and normal corn it increased.
The contents of total amino acids and essential amino acids in fresh period of waxy and sweet corn grain is lower than normal corn, but the percent of essential amino acids in total amino acids is higher than normal corn. In Pop corn grain they are highest in four types. In different endosperm type maize grain, the shorting of LYS is the first limiting factor, but the second is different.
In fresh period, the quality of protein in waxy and sweet corn grain is excelled than other types. Pop corn grain can accumulated more protein than others, and the protein efficient rate is higher than others.
2 The difference of formative mechanisms in different endosperm type maize grain
In process of sucrose synthesis, SS (synthesis) have dominant function in four type maize grains. In the development of grain, the average activities of SS in pop corn> sweet corn>normal corn>waxy corn. The average of SPS activities in sweet corn>pop corn>waxy corn>normal corn. The ability of sucrose synthesis in sweet corn is higher than others.
The degradation of sucrose is mainly depending on the SS (degradation) activity, and the effect of invertase is lower than SS. In the development of grain, the average activity of sweet corn grain > normal corn >waxy corn >pop corn, and invertase activity of pop corn > waxy corn >normal corn > sweet corn. The reason of more sugars in sweet corn grain is the increasing of ability of sucrose synthesis but not the decreasing of degradation of sucrose.
In different endosperm type maize grain, the activities of UDPG-PPase are higher than ADPG-PPase, SSS are higher than GBSS. The average activities of ADPG-PPase: wax corn >pop corn >normal corn >sweet corn, but the average activities of UDPG-PPase expressed as pop corn >waxy corn >sweet corn >normal corn. Both SSS and GBSS activities of normal corn >pop corn >sweet corn> waxy corn. Low activities of GBSS lead to the low content of amylose in waxy corn, and the intergrated effects of activities decrease of SSS, GBSS and SDE resulted in the lower starch content in sweet corn.
3 The effect of nitrogen on the quality of different endosperm type maize grain
The influences of nitrogen to the total soluble sugar content are different in different endosperm type maize grain. Nitrogen can improve the total soluble sugar content in waxy, sweet and normal corn, but decreased it in pop corn. The functions of nitrogen on different sugar components are different. Sucrose, mannitol and sorbitol content increased in four types maize grain after applied nitrogen. The time of no consistence of sorbitol in nitrogen treatment of sweet corn is shorter than control. The WSP content of sweet, pop
引文
[1] A Steven C.Huber, Richard F.Wilson,and J.W.Burton.Studies on Genetic Male-Sterile Soybeans. Plant Physiol.(1983)73,713-717
[2] A. Bar-zur, A. Schaffer Size and carbohydrate content of ears of baby corn in relation to endosperm type (Su, su, se, sh2) J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1993,118:141~144
[3] A.Kazawa T., Okamoto K., Bisythesis and metabolism of sucrose. In Press J. (ed). Biochemistry of plant, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp: 199-220
[4] A.P.Rees T, Leja M. et al. Nucleotides sugars and starch synthesie in spadix of a rum maculatum and suspension cultures of glycine max. Phytochem, 198423:2462-2468
[5] Adamson D. Wong, John A. Juvik, David C. Breeden, and John M. Swiader Shrunken2 sweet corn yield and the chemical components of qualitym J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1994, 19 (4):747~755
[6] Alan H. Schnlman and hannu Ahokas A novel shrunken endosperm mutant of barley Physsiologia plantrum, 1990,78:583~589
[7] Alison M. Smith, Kay Denyer, and Cathie R.martin What control the amount and structure of starch in storage organs? Plant physiology, 1995,107:673~677
[8] B.Muller-Rober and J.kobmann Approaches to influence starch quantity and starch quality in transgenic plants Plant, cell and Environment, 1994,17:601~613
[9] B.O.Juliano, M.B.Nazareno., J.Agr.Food.Chem.1969,17:1364
[10] Barer. G.A. The equilibrium of the reaction catalyzed by SPS, Plant Physiol, 1985,79:1127-1128
[11] Boyer C.D. 1985 In: Biochemical Basis of Plant Breeding vol.1. Carbon Metabolism. C.A.Neyra, de. CRC Rress.Znc.pp: 130-153
[12] Boyer CD, Preiss J. Evidence for independent genetic control of the multiple forms of maize endosperm SBE and starch synthase. Plant Physiol, 1981,67:1141-1145
[13] Brebaker JL.,Hasegawa Y. Polymorphisms of major peroxidase of maize. Isozymes III Development Biology. N.Y.: Acadenic Press, 1975,pp637-657
[14] Burton RA, Bewley J.D. Starch branching enzymes belonging to distinct enzyme family are differentially expressed during pea emg\bryo development. Plant J., 1995,7:3-15
[15] C. Y. Tasi, F. Salamini and O.E.Nelson Enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of maize Plant physiology, 1970,46:299~306
[16] C.D. boyer R.R.Daniels and J.C.Shannon. Am.J.Bot.,1977,64:50
[17] C.D.Boyer and J.Preiss. Biochem.Biophys.RES.Commun.,1978,80:169
[18] C.D.Boyer J.Hered.1976, 67:209
[19] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniel, and J.C.Shannon, Am.J.Bot.,1977,64:50
[20] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniel, and J.C.Shannon, Crop Sci., 1976,16:298
[21] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniels, and J.C.Shannon. Crop Sci., 1976,16:298
[22] C.Mercier, R.Charbonniere. Staerke, 1970,22:9
[23] C.Viswnathan and Renu Khanna-Chopra Effect of heat stress on grain growth,starch synthesis and protein synthesis in grains of wheat varieties differing in grain weight stability Journal agronomy &crop science,2001,186:1~7
[24] C.Y.Tsai and O.E.Nelson.Phosphorylases I and II of Maize Endosperm.Plant Physiology, 1967.103-112
[25] Cao H. Sullivan TD.,Boyer CD and shannon JC. Bt-1, a structural gene for he major 39-44 Kda amyloplast membrane polpeptides. Plant Physiol, 1995,95:176
[26] Chourey PS. Genetic control of sucrose synthetase in maize endosperm, Mol.gen.genet.1981, 184:372-376
[27] Chourey.P.S and O.E.Nelson, Biochemical Genetics, 1976,14:1041-1055
[28] Christopher D.Reeves, Hari B.Krishnan, and Thomas W.Okita.Gene Expression in Developing Wheat Endosperm.Plant Physiol. (1986) 82,34-40
[29] Consuelo M. Perez, Alicia A. Perdon, Adoracion P. Resurreccion, Ruth M. Villareal. And Bienvenido O. Juliano Enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in the developing rice grain Plant Physiology, 1975,56:579~583
[30] Creech.R.G.,Genetics,1965,52:1175-1186
[31] D.C.Holder, D.V.Glover and J.C.Shannon, Crop Sci., 1974,14: 643
[32] D.l.Garwood and R.G.Creech, Crop sci. 1972,12:119
[33] Dane K. Fisher, Charles D. Boyer, and L. Curtis Hannah. Starch branching enzyme II from maize endosperm. Plant physiology, 1993,102:1045~1046
[34] David Pan and Oliver E.Nelson A debraching enzyme deficiency in endosperm of the Sugary-1 mutants of maize Plant physiology, 1984,74:324~328
[35] David Pan and Oliver E.Nelson.A Debranching Enzyme Deficiency in Endosperms of the Sugary-1 Mutants of Maize.Plant Physiol.(1984)74,324-328
[36] Denyer K, Hylton CM., Jennor CF. et al; Identification of multiple isoforma of soluble and granule-bound starch synthase in the develoing wheat endosperm. Planta, 1995,196:256
[37] Denyer K, Smith AM. The purification and characterisation of the two forms of soluble starch synthase from developing pea embryos. Planta, 1992,186:609
[38] Diane M.Beckles, Alison M.Smith, and Tom AP Rees. A Cytosolic ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Is a Feature of Graminaceous Endosperms, But Not of Other Starch-Storing Organs.Plant Physiology, Februay 2001,Vol.125, pp.818-827
[39] Dickinson d.b.,Preiss J.,Presence of ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity in sh2 and bt2 mutants of maize ,Plant Physiol ,1969,49:1058-1062
[40] Douglas A. Smyth and Henry E. Prescott. Sugar content and activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes in milled rice grain. Plant Physiology, 1989,89:893~896
[41] Douglas C. Doehlert and Tsung Min Kuo. Sugar metabolism in developing kernels of starch-deficient endosperm mutant of maize Plant physiology, 1990,92:990~994
[42] Douglas C. Doehlert, Tsung Min Kuo and Frederick C.Felker. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metabolism in developing kernels of two inbreds of maize. Plant physiology, 1988,88:1013~1019
[43] Douglas C. Doehlert. Distribution of enzyme activities within the develping maize kernel in relation to starch, oil and protein accumulation. Physiologia plantarum, 1990,78:560~567
[44] Douglas C. Dohelert Ketose. Reductase Activity in Developing maize endosperm Plant physiology, 1987,84:830~834
[45] Douglas C.dohlert and Tsung Min Kuo. Chanacteristics of carbohydrate metabolism in seet corn endosperms. Journal americansoc.Hort.science ,1993, (5):661~666
[46] DunnGM, etal. Gene dosage effect on corn endosperm carbohydrates. Agron.J.,1953,45:101-104
[47] E.P.Palmiano and B.O.Juliano. Agr.boil.chem.. 1972,36:157
[48] Echt CS., Schwartz D. evidence for the inclusion of controling elements within the structural gene of the locus in maize. Genetics, 1981,99:275
[49] Echt.C.S. and P.S.Chourey, Plant Physiol.,1985,79:530-536
Edgardo Echeverria, Charles D.Boyer, Paul A. Thomas, Kang-Chen Liu, and Jack C. Shannon
[50] Enzyme activities associated with maize kernel amyloplasts Plant Physiology, 1988,86:786~792
[51] Edwares A, Marshall J. Biochemical and characterisation of a novel starch synthase from potato tubers. Plant J.1996,8:283
[52] Edwaro L. Cox and David B. Dickinson. Hexokinase from maize endosperm and scutellum Plant physiology, 1973,51:960~966
[53] Erwin Beck and Paul Zieger Biosynthesie and degradation of starch in higher plants Ann.Rev.Plant physiol. Plant Mol., 1989,40:95~117
[54] F.E.Horan and M.F.Heider. Cereal chem. 1946,23:492
[55] Fisher.D.K.,C.D.Boyer and L.C.Hannah. Plant Physiol., 1993,102:1045-1046
[56] Fraser D.Macdonald and Jack Preiss.Partial Purification and Characterization of Granule-Bound Starch Synthases from Normal and Waxy Maize.Plant Physiol. (1985) 78, 849-852
[57] G.Eriksson Hereditas, 1969,63:180
[58] Greetje H. Vos-Scheperkeuter, Janny G. de Wit, Anne S.Ponstein, Will J.Feenstra and Bernard Witholt Immunological comparison of the starch branching enzymes from photo tubers and maize kernels Plant physiology, 1989,90:75~84
[59] Guan H.P. and J.Preiss. Plant Physiol., 1993,102:1269-1273
[60] Guan HP,Preiss J. Differentiation of the properties the branching isomes frem maize . Plant Physiol, 1993,102:1269-1273
[61] H.Wayne Polley Implications of atmospheric and climatic change for crop yield and water use efficiency. Crop science, 2002,42:131~140
[62] Han Ping Guan and Jack Preiss. Differentiation of the properties of the branching isozymes from Maize Plant physiology, 1993,102:1269~1273
[63] Hannah LC.,Nelson OE. Chanracterization of ADPG pyrophosphorylase from developing maize seeds Plant Physiol., 1975.55:297-302
[64] Hawker.J.S. Chang in the activities of enzymes concerned with sugar metabolism during the development of grape berries. Phytochem.,1969,8:9-18
[65] Hedman,K.D. and C.D.Boyer. Biochemical Genetics, 1966,53:661
[66] HG.Nass and P.L.Crane. Crop Sci., 1970,10:276
[67] Ian F. Wardlaw, and Johannes Willenbrink Carbohydrate storage and mobilization by the clum of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1994,21:255~271
[68] Ian F.Wardlaw and Johannes Willenbrink. Carbohydrate Storage and Mobilisation by the culm of Wheat between Heading and Grain Maturity:the Relation to Sucrose Synthase and Sucrose-phosphate Synthase. Aust. J. Plant Physiol, 1994,21,255-71
[69] J. L. Ozbun, J. S. Hawker, E. Greenberg, C. Lammel, and Jack Preiss Starch synthetase, Phosphorylase, ADPG-PPase, and UDPG-PPase in developing maize kernels Plant Physiology, 1973,51:1~5
[70] J.Y.Yeh, D.L.Garwood and J.C.Shannon. Staerke/Starch, 1981,33:222
[71] Jack C. Shannon, Fang-Mei Pien, and Kang-Chien Liu Nucleotides and nucleotide sugars in developing maize endosperm Plant physiology, 1996110:835~843
[72] Jack Preiss Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of starch Ann. Rev. Plant physiology, 1982,33:431~434
[73] James MG, Robertson Ds, Myers AM. Characterization of maize gene su1,a determinant of starch compoistion in kernels. Plant Cell, 1995,7:417
[74] Jane E. Ferguson, David B. Dickinson, and Ashby M. Rhodes Analysis of endosperm sugars in a sweet corn inbred which contains the sugary enchancer (se) gene and comparison of se with other corn genotypes Plant physiology, 1979,63:416~420
[75] Janine R. Studies of sugars and sorbitol in developing corn kernels. Plant Physiology.，1984, 75: 207-211[18]
[76] Jean-Louis Prioul, Emmanuelle Jeannette, Agnes Reyss.Expression of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase in Maize (Zea mays L.)Grain and Source Leaf during Grain filling. Plant Physiol.(1994)104:179-187
[77] Joan C. Swank, Frederick E. Below, Rober J. Lambert, and Richard H. Hageman Interaction of carbon and Nitrogen metabolism in the productivity of maize Plant physiology, 1982,70:1185~1190
[78] John R. Lauchnan. The effect of the sh2 fector on carbohydrate reseves in the maize endosperm of maize. Genetics 1983,38:485~499
[79] Jorge W. Gonzales, Ashby M. Rhodes, and David B. Dickinson Carbohydrate and enzymic characterization of a high sucrose sugary inbred line of sweet corn Plant physiology,1976,58:28~32
[80] K.B. Evensen and C.D.Boyer Carbohydrate composition and sensory quality of fresh and stored sweet corn Journal American.Soc.Hort.Sci.1986, 11195:734~738
[81] Kay Denyer, Francie Dunlap,Tine Thorbjernsen.The Major Form of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase in Maize Endosperm Is Extra-Plastidial.Plant Physiol.(1996)112:779-785
[82] Klosgen RB, Gierl A, Schwarz Z et al . Molecular analysis of waxy locus of maize. Mol: Gegenet, 1985,203:237
[83] Kouichi Mizuno, Tsutmu Kawsaaki, Hiroaki Shimada Alternation of the structural properties of starch components by the lack of an isoforn of starch branching enzyme in rice seeds The journal of biological chemistry, 1993,268:19084~19091
[84] Kuiper RB et al. Field evaluation of antisense RNA mediated inhibition of GBSS gene expression in potato. Euphytica, 1992,59:83
[85] Lavintamn N. The formation of branched glucan in sweet corn. Arch.. Biochem. Biophys. , 1966,116:1-8
[86] Lin TP., Caspar T, Preiss J. Isolation and characterization of starchless mutant of Arbidopsis thaliana Hegnh lacking ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity . Plant Physiol , 1988,86:1131-1135
[87] M. R. Campbell, P.J.White and L.M.Pollak Properties of sugary-2 maize starch:influence of exotic background Cereal chemistry, 1998,72(4):389~392
[88] M.J.Giroux, L.C.Hannah.ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in shrunken-2 and brittle-2 mutants of maize. Mol Gen Genet (1994) 243:400-408
[89] M.K. Morell, S. Rahman, A. Regina, R.Appels & Z. Li Wheat starch biosynthesis Euphytica,2001,119:55~58
[90] Marshall J. sSidebottom C. Identification of the major starch synthase in the soluble fraction of potato tubers. Plant Cell, 1996,6:1121-1135
[91] Martin C.Smith AM. Starch biosythesis Plant Cell, 1995,7:971-985
[92] Mericer, R.Charbonniere, D.Gallant, and A.Guilbot.,Staerke,1970,22:9
[93] Morrison W.R., Laignelet B. A improved colorimetric procedure for determinnig apparent and total amylose in cereal and other starches. J.Cereal.Sci.,1983,1:9-20
[94] Mu C.et al. Association of a 76 kd polypeptides with soluble starch synthase I activity in maize endosperm. Plant Jour., 1994,6:151
[95] Muller-Rober B, Kobnan J. , Approach to influence starch quantity and starch quality in transgentic plants .Plant Cell and Enviroment ,1994,17:601
[96] Nakamura Y, Kawaguchi K. Multiple forms of ADPG pyrophosphorylase of rice endosperm. Plant Physiol., 1991,84:336
[97] Nakamura Y, Umemoto T, Ogata N, et al. Starch debranching enzymes from developing rice endosperm purification, cDNA and chromosomal location of the gene. Planta, 1996,199:209
[98] Nathalie Gerrits Sucrose metabolism in plastids Plant physiology, 2001,125:926~934
[99] Nelson.OE.et.al. The enzymatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biolchem. Biophys.Res.Commun.,1962,9:297
[100] O.E.Nelson. Adv.Cereal.Sci.Technol. vol III ,1980,2:41-71
[101] O.H.Miller and E.E.Burns.,J.Food sci.1970,35:666
[102] Okita TW. Is there an alternative pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiol, 1992, 100:560-564
[103] Oliver E.Nelson Jr. and Benjamin Burr Biochemical genetics of higher plants Ann. Rev. Plant physiology, 1973,24:493~518
[104] Oliver Nelson and David Pan Starch synthesis in maize endosperms. Annu.Rev.Plant physiology. Plant Mol.boil.1995, 46:475~496
[105] P.J. Stone, D. R. Wilson, J.B. Reid and R. N. Gillespie Water deficit effects on sweet corn. I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth, and yield Aust. J. Agric. Res., 2001,52:103~113
[106] Pan D,Nelosn OE. A debranching enzyme defiency in endosperms of the su1 mutants of maize . Plant Physiol ,1984,74:324-328
[107] Peek NH et al. Sweet corn plant response to P and K in the soil and to ban-applied monoammonoum phosphate,Potassium sulfate and Magneisim sulfate. J.Amer. Soc.Hort. Sci., 1989,114:267-272
[108] Peggy Chevalier and Sarch E.Lingle Sugar metabolism in developing kernels of wheat and barley Crop science, 1983, 23:272~277
[109] Peter L Keeling, John R. Wood , R..Huw Tyson, and Ian G.Bridges Starch biosynthesis in developing wheat grain Plant physiology, 1988,87:311~319
[110] Petersen KL et al> Effect of tillage and irrigation on the growth and yield of sweet corn. Hort.Sci.,1984,19:596
[111] Plaxton WC, Preiss J, Purification and properties of nonproteolytc degraded ADPG pyrophosphorylase from maize endosperm. Plant Physiol ,1987, 83:105
[112] Preiss J. Biology and molecular biology of starch synthesis and it regulation . Oxf.Surv.Plant.Mol.Cell.Biol.,1991,7:59-114
[113] Prioul JL. Jeannette E , Reyss A. et al . Experssion of ADPG pyrophosphorylase in maize grain and source leaf during filling. Plant Physiol.,1994,107:179
[114] R.C.Black, J.D.Loerch,F.J.Mcardle and R.G.Creech,Genetics,1966,53:661
[115] R.G.Creech and F.J.Mcardle. Crop Sci.,1965,6:192
[116] R.M.Hixon Starch and Its Derivatives J.A.Radley,ed.,Chapman and Hall,London.4th Ed. 1968,p.247
[117] R.M.Soberalske and R.H.Andrew Gene effects on kernel moisteure and sugars of near-ioogenetic lines of sweet corn Crop science, 1978,18:743~746
[118] R.M.Soberalske and R.H.Andrew Gene effects on water soluble polysaccharides and starch of near-ioogenetic lines of sweet corn Crop science, 1980,20:201~204
[119] R.P.Brow, R.G.Creech and L.J.Johonson, crop sci.1971, 11:297
[120] R.Singh and B.O. Julicmo Plant physiol. 1977,59:417
[121] Robin Manelius, Hannu Maaheimo, Kari Nurmal, Eric Bertoft Characterisation of fraction obtained by isoamylolysis and ion-exchange chromatography of cationic Waxy starch Starch/saarke, 2002,54:58~65
[122] Rosali B. Frydman and C.E. Cardini Studies on the biosynthesis of starch The journal of biological chemistry, 1967,25:312~317
[123] Rowel B. Tobias, Charies D. Boyer, and Jack C. Shannon Alternations in carbohydrate intermediztes in the endosperm of starch-deficient maize genotypes Plant physiology, 1992,99:146~152
[124] S.Peat. W.J.Whelom, and J.R.Turvey. J.Chewm.Soc 1956,2317
[125] Shannon JC.,Pien F-M, LiuKC . Nucleotides and nucleotide sugars in developing maize endosperms synthesis of ADPG in bt-1. Plant Physiol .1996,110:835-843
[126] Smith AM.,Brttey M.,Bedford ID. Evidence that the rblocus alters the starch content of developing pea embryo though an effect on ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Plant Physiol, 1989,89:1279
[127] Smith-White BJ>,Preiss J.Comparison of proteins of of ADPG pyrophosphorylase from diverse sources. J.Mol.Evol.,1992,34:449-464
[128] Sprague GF,et al. Some effects of the waxy gene in corn on properties of the endosperm starch . J.Am.Soc.Agron, 1943,35:817
[129] Stark DM., Timmerman KP. et al. Regulation of the starch in plant tissue by ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Science, 1992,258:287
[130] Stark DM., Timmerman KP. Et al. Regulation of the starch in plant tissue by ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Science, 1992,258:287
[131] Steven C. Huber, Richard F. Wilson, and J.W. burton Studies on genetic male-sterile soybeans Plant physiology, 1983,73:713~717
[132] Steven C.Huber and Tskashi Akazawa A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells Plant physiology, 1986,81:1008~1013
[133] Stindrd,P.S.,D.S.Robertson and P.S.Schnable ,Plant Cell,1993,5:1555-1566
[134] T. Kasemsuwan, J. Jane, P. Schnable, P. Stinard and D. Robertson Characterization of the dominant mutant amylose-extender maize starch Cereal Chemistry, 1995,72 (5): 157~464
[135] T.D. Ugalde and C.F.Jenner Subrate gradients and regional patterns of dry matter deposition within developing wheat endosperm. I carbohydrates Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1990,17:377~394
[136] Takeda Y, Huan HP, Preiss J. Branching of amylose by the branching isoenzymes of maize endosperm. Carbohydr.Res.,1993,240:253-263
[137] Takeda Y., H.P.Guan and J.Preiss Carbohydr.Res.,1993,240:253-263
[138] Takeshi Yasul, Masaharu Seguch, maoyuki Ishikawa, Masaya Fujita Starch properties of waxy mutant line of hull-less Barley Starch/saarke, 2002,54:179~184
[139] Thomas D. Sullivan, Yasuko Kaneko The maize brittle gene encodes amyloplast membrane polypetides Planta, 1995,196:477~484
[140] Thomas W. Okita Is there an alternative pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiology, 1992,100:560~564
[141] Thomas W.Rufty, Jr. and Steven C. Huber Changes in starch formation and activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and cytoplasmic fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase in response to source-sink alternations Plant physiology, 1983,72:474~480
[142] Tsai CY.,Nelson OE. Starch-deficient maize mutant lacking ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity . Science, 1966,151:341-343
[143] Tsai.CY. Correlation of enzymatic zctivity with wx dosage. Maize gent.coop. Neuslett., 1965,39:153
[144] Tsan-Piao Lin, Timothy Caspar, Chris Somerville,and Jack Periss.Isolation and Characterization of a Starchless Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh Lacking ADPglucose Pyrophosphorylase Activity.Plant Physiol.(1988) 86.1131-1135
[145] V.L.Fergason, J.L.Helm, and M.S..Zuber, Crop Sci., 1966,6:273
[146] Villand P., Oleson OA. Kleczkowski LA. Molecular characterization of multiple cDNA clones for ADPG pyrophosphorylase from Arabidoposis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol., 1993, 23: 1279
[147] W.Banks, C.T.Greenwood and D.D.Muir, Staerke, 1974,26:289
[148] W.C.Mussulman and J.A.Wagoner. Cereal Chem., 1968,45:162
[149] Wang.Y.J. P.White, L.Pollak and J.Jane. Cereal Chem., 1993,7(2): 171-179
[150] Warren H. starch-synthesing enzymes in the endosperm and pollen of maize
[151] Weber H., Hein U, Borisjuk l et al. Cell type specific, coordinate expression of two ADPG pyrophosphorylase gene relation to starch biosynthesis during seed development of Vicia faba L. Planta, 1995,195:32
[152] Yan.S.H.,N.K.Matheson.,Carbohydr.Res.,1992,270:85-101
[153] Yasunori Nnkamura, kazuhiro Yukl, Shin-Young Park and Toshihide Ohya Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grains Plant cell physiology, 1989,30 (6): 833~839
[154] Ying Yu, Helen He Mu, Bruce P.Wasserman, and George M.Carman.Identification of the Maize Amyloplast Stromal 112-KD Protein as a Plastidic Starch Phosphorylase.Plant Physiology,January 2001,Vol.125,pp.351-359
[155] Ying Yu, Helen He Mu, Chen Mu-Forster, and Bruce P.Wasserman Polypeptides of the maize amyloplast stroma Plant physiology, 1998,116:1451~1460
[156] Yoshito Watanabe, Yasunori Nakamura and Ryuichi Ishii Relationship between starch accumulation and activities of the related enzymes in the leaf sheath as a temporary sink orange in rice Aust. J. plant physiology, 1997,24:563~569
[157] 包劲松. 基因工程改良作物淀粉品质. 上海农业学报，1198，14（1）：90~96
[158] 蔡大同，苑泽圣，杨桂芬等. 氮肥不同时期施用对优质小麦产量和加工品质的影响. 土壤肥料，1994，2： 19～21
[159] 蔡大同，张春兰，蒋廷惠等. 氮，钾肥对饼干小麦植株各部分干物质和养分含量的作用.土壤肥料1998,（4）：12～15
[160] 曹敏建，孙国鹃. 玉米高产栽培的加速生理作用. 玉米科学，1998，6(1)，66～68
[161] 陈范骏，曹敏建，陈艳如. 玉米对氮素营养利用的遗传差异及其生理机制[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报，1998，29（4）：314~318
[162] 陈国平. 玉米的干物质生产与分配. 玉米科学，1994，2（1）：48~53
[163] 陈锦新，张国平 氮，钾用量与配比对大麦籽粒品质的影响 浙江农业学报，2000，12（2）：74～77
[164] 陈文华. 氮肥运筹方法对稻茬免耕大麦产量和品质的影响 浙江农业大学学报，1995，21(1)：41-48
[165] 陈英取. 氮磷钾用量及配比对甜玉米产量与品质的影响. 华南农业大学学报. 1993，14(1):33-38.
[166] 陈永新，翟广谦，田福海. 甜玉米速冻加工技术研究[J].玉米科学，1998，4:73~76
[167] 程素贞，王秀功. 钾肥对小麦氮，磷，钾的吸收分配及产量，品质的关系[J]. 安徽农业大学学报，1982，20（3）：252~259
[168] 程素贞，谢淑芸. 氮肥对啤酒大麦ZN、MN、 FE、 MO 营养效应的研究[J]. 土壤通报，1999，30(2):71~73.
[169] 楚铃，陆发熹，刘数基. 氮钾肥配施对赤红壤上甜玉米生长影响的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报，1989，10（3）：42~51
[170] 崔彦宏，周海，李伯航. 甜玉米籽粒的营养品质及影响因素[J]，河北农业大学学报，1996，19（4）：99~104
[171] 戴良香 冬小麦氮素营养特性及其影响因素 河北职业技术师范学院学报，1997，11（4）：65～70
[172] 杜金哲，李文雄，白祥和等. 春小麦籽粒蛋白质积累和产量形成规律及施氮的调节作用.东北农业大学学报，1999，30（1）：1～9
[173] 杜金哲，李文雄，胡尚连等. 春小麦不同品质类型氮的吸收，转化利用及与籽粒产量和蛋白质的关系. 作物学报，2001，27（2）：253～260
[174] 范仲学，王璞，粱振兴. 利用同位素示踪研究夏玉米灌浆期同化产物的运转. 核农学报（Acta Agriculture Nucleatae Science），2001，15(1)：32-37
[175] 高振宇，黄大年. 植物支链淀粉合成的关健酶――淀粉分支酶. 生物工程进展，1998，18（8）：29～31
[176] 何成辉，何天秀.钾肥对啤酒大麦品质的影响研究[J].土壤通报，1991，22（1）：44~46
[177] 何萍，金继运，林葆 不同氮磷钾用量下春玉米生物产量及其组分动态与养分吸收模式研究 植物营养与肥料学报 1998，4（2）123～130
[178] 何萍，金继运，林葆. 玉米高产施肥营养生理研究进展[J]. 玉米科学，1998，6（2）：72~75
[179] 何萍，金继运. 氮钾营养对春玉米叶片衰老过程中激素变化与酶活性代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1999，5（4）：289~296
[180] 何中虎 糯小麦的研究概况 作物杂志，1999（2）7～9
[181] 洪建，黎军英，高其康，蒋德英 钾营养影响水道叶绿体的形态定量分析 浙江农业大学学报，1998，24（S）1～4
[182] 胡昌浩 ，玉米栽培生理，中国农业出版社，1995
[183] 黄金宝，张恩和，胡恒觉 不同玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的生理生态机制 植物营养与肥料学报，2001，7（3）293～297
[184] 贾振华，李华. 施肥对小麦产量与品质形成影响的研究 河南职技师院学报，1990，18(3，4)：91-95
[185] 钾肥对啤酒大麦品质的影响研究 土壤通报 1991，22(1)：44-46
[186] 姜东，于振文，李永庚等. 冬小麦开花前后茎和叶鞘中贮存的碳水化合物含量的变化[J]. 植物生理学通讯，2000，36（6）：507~511
[187] 姜东，于振文，李永庚等. 冬小麦叶茎粒可溶性糖含量变化及其与籽粒淀粉积累的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报，2001，21（3）:38~41
[188] 蒋德安，绕立华，彭佐权.钾对水稻产量形成的一些生理效应[J].浙江农业大学学报，1987，13(4):441~444
[189] 金继运，何萍. 氮钾互作对春玉米生物产量及其组分动态的影响 玉米科学，1999，7（4）：57～60
[190] 金继运，何萍. 氮钾营养对春玉米后期碳氮代谢与粒重形成的影响 中国农业科学，1999，22（4）55～62
[191] 赖庆旺. 红壤土施钾对粮食作物品质的影响. 化肥工业，1989，3：24-26
[192] 蓝新伟，江素琼. 鲜食期甜玉米采后营养成分风味和呼吸强度的变化[J].中国蔬菜，1993，32（1）：13~16
[193] 李华，杨肖娥，罗安程. 不同氮钾条件下水稻基因型氮，钾积累利用差异. 中国水稻科学（Chinese journal of rice science，2002，16(1):86～88
[194] 李金才，魏风珍 氮素营养对小麦产量和籽粒蛋白质及组分含量的影响 中国粮油学报，2001，16（2）6～8
[195] 李金才，魏风珍. 氮素营养对小麦产量和籽粒蛋白质及组分含量的影响.中国粮油学报，2001，16（2）6～8
[196] 李晓亮， 我国特用型玉米育种的进展及综合利用。安徽农学通报，1998.4.（1）： 29～32
[197] 李孝良 氮磷钾肥对小麦生长发育及品质的影响 安徽农业技术师范学院学报，1998，12（4）：12～14
[198] 李孝良. 氮磷钾肥对小麦生长发育及品质的影响. 安徽农业技术师范学院学报，1998，12（4）：12～14
[199] 李新海，焦少杰. 甜玉米品质的遗传改良[J].黑龙江农业科学，1996，3：34~36
[200] 李学渊， 玉米突变基因与互作对子粒成分的影响，作物学报，1993，19（5）
[201] 李宗智. 玉米品质的遗传改良. 河北农业大学学报，1984，12（7）：29～39
[202] 李宗智. 玉米品质的遗传改良. 河北农业大学学报，1984，12（7）：29～39
[203] 林琳，特用玉米的发展前景。作物研究，1994.8（3）：44～46
[204] 刘保国，任昌福 水稻品种直链淀粉的积累特性与WX蛋白的关系 西南农业大学学报，1989，11（4）：378-382
[205] 刘建祥，杨肖娥，吴良欢等. 低钾胁迫对水稻叶片光合功能的影响及其基因型差异. 作物学报，2001，27（6）：1000～1006
[206] 刘冶先. 世界玉米经济的研究现状和发展趋势。国外文学—杂粮作物。1998.18（2）：7～11
[207] 刘治先，玉米油及优质油玉米育种，玉米科学，1996，3：16-18
[208] 鲁剑巍 钾，硫肥配施对作物产量与品质的影响 土壤通报 1994，25 (5)：216-218
[209] 陆庆，蒋德安，翁晓燕等. 钾营养对不同水稻基因型物质生产和光合作用的效应. 浙江农业大学学报，1999，25（3），267～270
[210] 米国华，刘建安，张福锁 玉米氮效率生理生化基础及遗传改良进展 玉米科学 1997，5（2）：9～13
[211] 敏建，戴俊英，邱忠祥. 钾对玉米叶片物质代谢及产量的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报，1992，23 (1)：7~16
[212] 欧阳华民，曹一平，王敬国等. 叶面施肥和遮荫对玉米叶施15N的吸收和分配的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4（2）：188~191
[213] 上官周平 氮素营养对旱作小麦光合特性的调控 植物营养与肥料学报，1997，3（2）：105～109
[214] 沈同 生物化学 高等教育出版社1981
[215] 沈伟其. 钾素对杂交水稻个体及群体的生理效应[J].浙江农业大学学报， 1987，14(4):101~106
[216] 石德权，我国优质蛋白玉米研究取得新进展。作物杂志，1995，1：2-5
[217] 石孝均 锌，锰与含氯氮肥配施对冬小麦子粒营养品质的影响 植物营养与肥料学(2)报.1997，3(2):160-168.
[218] 史振声 钾肥对甜玉米子粒品质和茎干含糖量的影响 玉米科学. 1994，2(1):76-80.
[219] 宋同明，发展我国特用玉米产业的意义，潜力和方向。玉米科学，1996.（10）：6～11
孙振，李京红，于同泉 玉米胚乳不同糯质基因型对总淀粉及支链淀粉含量的影响. 浙江农业
[220] 大学学报，1999，25（3），267～270
[221] 索全义，赵利梅，迟玉亭. 氮肥对春玉米籽粒建成及品质形成的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）：197~201
[222] 唐湘如，官春云. 几种酶活性与油菜油分和蛋白质及产量的关系. 湖南农业大学学报，（journal of hunan agriculture university）2000，26(1):37~40
[223] 唐湘如，谭中文，李之林等. CPPU和PP333对杂交稻3个淀粉合成酶活性和米质的影响. 杂交水稻，（HYBRID RICE）2002，17(3):44~46
[224] 腾应，钱晓刚，何腾兵，陆引罡 玉米不同基因型对钾营养胁迫的反应 耕作与栽培，2001，2：43～45
[225] 佟屏亚，凌碧莹. 夏玉米氮，磷，钾积累和分配态势研究[J].玉米科学，1994，2（2）：65~69
[226] 佟屏亚，玉米综合利用的发展策略和方向。农业科技通讯，1991.（11）：10
[227] 王春枝，葛海峰，姚刚等. 钾肥对春玉米氮磷钾吸收动态模型及养分生产效率影响的研究. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）148～152
[228] 王德仁，卢婉芳，陈苇.施氮对稻米蛋白质，氨基酸含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报，2001，7（3）353～356
[229] 王立秋. 小麦品质生理研究进展[J]. 国外农学－麦类作物，1996，3：31~32
[230] 王朋文，戴俊英，赵桂坤.玉米种植密度对产量何品质的影响[J].玉米科学，1996，4（4）：
[231] 王旭东，于振文，范广华等. 钾素对冬小麦品质和产量的影响. 山东农业科学，2000，3：16~18
[232] 王永锐，李卫军 耐低钾基因型水稻品种孕穗期剑叶生理及根系活力 生态科学1997，16(1)67～70
[233] 王永锐，周洁. 杂交水稻穗期氮钾营养对剑叶生理特性的影响 中国水稻科学，1997，11（3）
[234] 王玉兰， 国内外爆裂玉米遗传育种研究动态。吉林农业大学学报，1998.20（4）：99～102
[235] 位东斌，林琪，王志良.中后期追氮对小麦叶片氮含量及籽粒产量何蛋白质含量的影响[J].河南职技师院学报，1990，18（3）97~101
[236] 魏益民. 小麦品质的评价及品质改良. 陕西农业科学，1989，1：47~49
[237] 吴巍 ，张宽，王秀芳等. 钾肥对玉米的增产增收效果与利用率[J].玉米科学，1998，6（1）：61~65
[238] 吴晓峻 尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶. 植物生理学通讯，2000，36（3）：193-200
[239] 夏培帧，王少仁. 氮磷肥对小麦，玉米子粒氨基酸的影响 土壤肥料 ，1995，2：9-13
[240] 肖凯，张荣铣，钱维朴. 氮素营养对小麦群体光合碳同化作用的影响及其调控机制. 植物营养与肥料学报，1999，5（3）：235～243
[241] 谢志新 氮肥用量对大麦氮代谢和子粒品质的效应. 浙江农业大学学报.1989，15(1):1-7
[242] 许崇香， 糯质玉米的研究进展。玉米科学.1995.3（3）：16～18
[243] 杨 杰. 氮钾互作对马铃薯产量，品质与氮磷钾吸收的影响. 华南农业大学学报.1993，14(1):28-32.
[244] 杨太兴，曾孟潜 玉米胚乳和胚发育过程中物质积累和同工酶和蛋白质的变化， 植物生理学报，1984，10（1）：77-89
[245] 姚源喜，杨延蕃，邓迎海. 施肥对冬小麦和夏玉米氨基酸和蛋白质含量的影响 莱阳农学院学报，1991，8(1)8-10
[246] 于振文，作物栽培学，中国农业出版社，1995
[247] 曾三省，爆裂玉米的开发利用，农业科技通讯.1987，4(9)：12
[248] 翟风林. 作物品质育种 中国农业出版社，1992
[249] 翟广谦，陈永新，田福海. 速冻保鲜甜、糯玉米营养品质分析. 山西农业科学，1997，25（3）：49~51
[250] 翟广谦，陈永新，田福海. 甜，糯玉米鲜食期品质变化及保鲜技术研究[J].山西农业科学，1997，25（1）：24~27
[251] 张福锁，米国华，刘建安 玉米氮效率遗传改良及其应用 农业生物技术学报1997，5（2）113～116
[252] 张国平，张光恒. 小麦氮素利用效率的基因型差异研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报，1996，2（4）332~336
[253] 张冀涛 不同栽培条件与小麦子粒品质的关系 干旱地区农业研究，1991，2：16-21
[254] 张敬涛.不同啤麦品种与氮磷钾肥的综合效应. 土壤肥料，1997（4）：26～28
[255] 张铭堂 玉米之遗传，科学农业，1994，42（5，6）：120-132
[256] 赵例梅，王贵平，高炳德，孟德 氮磷钾平衡施肥对春玉米籽粒 建成及品质形成的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报 2000，21（S）：16～20
[257] 赵例梅，王贵平，高炳德等. 氮磷钾平衡施肥对春玉米籽粒建成及品质形成的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）：16～20
[258] 植物营养与品质
[259] 周顺利，张福锁，王兴仁等. 高产条件下不同品种冬小麦氮素营养吸收与利用特性的比较研究. 土壤肥料，2000（6）：20～24
[260] 周晓芬，张彦才，李巧云. 不同供钾源及其用量对钾素营养的影响. 土壤通报，（chinese journal of soil science）2001，32(1)32~34
[261] 周兆德，李田贵，黄启为等. 磷钾配比对叶类蔬菜产量和品质德影响[J].湖南农业大学学报，1991，17(s):395~399
[262] 庄铁成，高淀粉玉米的遗传与育种，玉米科学，1996，4：12-14
[263] 邹春琴，李春俭，张福锁等. 铁和不同形态氮素对玉米植株吸收矿质元素及其在体内分布的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报，1996，2（1）：68~73
[264] 邹国元，杨志福，李晓林. 钾对玉米苗期抗冷性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4（2）165～169
[2] A. Bar-zur, A. Schaffer Size and carbohydrate content of ears of baby corn in relation to endosperm type (Su, su, se, sh2) J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1993,118:141~144
[3] A.Kazawa T., Okamoto K., Bisythesis and metabolism of sucrose. In Press J. (ed). Biochemistry of plant, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp: 199-220
[4] A.P.Rees T, Leja M. et al. Nucleotides sugars and starch synthesie in spadix of a rum maculatum and suspension cultures of glycine max. Phytochem, 198423:2462-2468
[5] Adamson D. Wong, John A. Juvik, David C. Breeden, and John M. Swiader Shrunken2 sweet corn yield and the chemical components of qualitym J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1994, 19 (4):747~755
[6] Alan H. Schnlman and hannu Ahokas A novel shrunken endosperm mutant of barley Physsiologia plantrum, 1990,78:583~589
[7] Alison M. Smith, Kay Denyer, and Cathie R.martin What control the amount and structure of starch in storage organs? Plant physiology, 1995,107:673~677
[8] B.Muller-Rober and J.kobmann Approaches to influence starch quantity and starch quality in transgenic plants Plant, cell and Environment, 1994,17:601~613
[9] B.O.Juliano, M.B.Nazareno., J.Agr.Food.Chem.1969,17:1364
[10] Barer. G.A. The equilibrium of the reaction catalyzed by SPS, Plant Physiol, 1985,79:1127-1128
[11] Boyer C.D. 1985 In: Biochemical Basis of Plant Breeding vol.1. Carbon Metabolism. C.A.Neyra, de. CRC Rress.Znc.pp: 130-153
[12] Boyer CD, Preiss J. Evidence for independent genetic control of the multiple forms of maize endosperm SBE and starch synthase. Plant Physiol, 1981,67:1141-1145
[13] Brebaker JL.,Hasegawa Y. Polymorphisms of major peroxidase of maize. Isozymes III Development Biology. N.Y.: Acadenic Press, 1975,pp637-657
[14] Burton RA, Bewley J.D. Starch branching enzymes belonging to distinct enzyme family are differentially expressed during pea emg\bryo development. Plant J., 1995,7:3-15
[15] C. Y. Tasi, F. Salamini and O.E.Nelson Enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of maize Plant physiology, 1970,46:299~306
[16] C.D. boyer R.R.Daniels and J.C.Shannon. Am.J.Bot.,1977,64:50
[17] C.D.Boyer and J.Preiss. Biochem.Biophys.RES.Commun.,1978,80:169
[18] C.D.Boyer J.Hered.1976, 67:209
[19] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniel, and J.C.Shannon, Am.J.Bot.,1977,64:50
[20] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniel, and J.C.Shannon, Crop Sci., 1976,16:298
[21] C.D.Boyer, R.R.Daniels, and J.C.Shannon. Crop Sci., 1976,16:298
[22] C.Mercier, R.Charbonniere. Staerke, 1970,22:9
[23] C.Viswnathan and Renu Khanna-Chopra Effect of heat stress on grain growth,starch synthesis and protein synthesis in grains of wheat varieties differing in grain weight stability Journal agronomy &crop science,2001,186:1~7
[24] C.Y.Tsai and O.E.Nelson.Phosphorylases I and II of Maize Endosperm.Plant Physiology, 1967.103-112
[25] Cao H. Sullivan TD.,Boyer CD and shannon JC. Bt-1, a structural gene for he major 39-44 Kda amyloplast membrane polpeptides. Plant Physiol, 1995,95:176
[26] Chourey PS. Genetic control of sucrose synthetase in maize endosperm, Mol.gen.genet.1981, 184:372-376
[27] Chourey.P.S and O.E.Nelson, Biochemical Genetics, 1976,14:1041-1055
[28] Christopher D.Reeves, Hari B.Krishnan, and Thomas W.Okita.Gene Expression in Developing Wheat Endosperm.Plant Physiol. (1986) 82,34-40
[29] Consuelo M. Perez, Alicia A. Perdon, Adoracion P. Resurreccion, Ruth M. Villareal. And Bienvenido O. Juliano Enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in the developing rice grain Plant Physiology, 1975,56:579~583
[30] Creech.R.G.,Genetics,1965,52:1175-1186
[31] D.C.Holder, D.V.Glover and J.C.Shannon, Crop Sci., 1974,14: 643
[32] D.l.Garwood and R.G.Creech, Crop sci. 1972,12:119
[33] Dane K. Fisher, Charles D. Boyer, and L. Curtis Hannah. Starch branching enzyme II from maize endosperm. Plant physiology, 1993,102:1045~1046
[34] David Pan and Oliver E.Nelson A debraching enzyme deficiency in endosperm of the Sugary-1 mutants of maize Plant physiology, 1984,74:324~328
[35] David Pan and Oliver E.Nelson.A Debranching Enzyme Deficiency in Endosperms of the Sugary-1 Mutants of Maize.Plant Physiol.(1984)74,324-328
[36] Denyer K, Hylton CM., Jennor CF. et al; Identification of multiple isoforma of soluble and granule-bound starch synthase in the develoing wheat endosperm. Planta, 1995,196:256
[37] Denyer K, Smith AM. The purification and characterisation of the two forms of soluble starch synthase from developing pea embryos. Planta, 1992,186:609
[38] Diane M.Beckles, Alison M.Smith, and Tom AP Rees. A Cytosolic ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Is a Feature of Graminaceous Endosperms, But Not of Other Starch-Storing Organs.Plant Physiology, Februay 2001,Vol.125, pp.818-827
[39] Dickinson d.b.,Preiss J.,Presence of ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity in sh2 and bt2 mutants of maize ,Plant Physiol ,1969,49:1058-1062
[40] Douglas A. Smyth and Henry E. Prescott. Sugar content and activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes in milled rice grain. Plant Physiology, 1989,89:893~896
[41] Douglas C. Doehlert and Tsung Min Kuo. Sugar metabolism in developing kernels of starch-deficient endosperm mutant of maize Plant physiology, 1990,92:990~994
[42] Douglas C. Doehlert, Tsung Min Kuo and Frederick C.Felker. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metabolism in developing kernels of two inbreds of maize. Plant physiology, 1988,88:1013~1019
[43] Douglas C. Doehlert. Distribution of enzyme activities within the develping maize kernel in relation to starch, oil and protein accumulation. Physiologia plantarum, 1990,78:560~567
[44] Douglas C. Dohelert Ketose. Reductase Activity in Developing maize endosperm Plant physiology, 1987,84:830~834
[45] Douglas C.dohlert and Tsung Min Kuo. Chanacteristics of carbohydrate metabolism in seet corn endosperms. Journal americansoc.Hort.science ,1993, (5):661~666
[46] DunnGM, etal. Gene dosage effect on corn endosperm carbohydrates. Agron.J.,1953,45:101-104
[47] E.P.Palmiano and B.O.Juliano. Agr.boil.chem.. 1972,36:157
[48] Echt CS., Schwartz D. evidence for the inclusion of controling elements within the structural gene of the locus in maize. Genetics, 1981,99:275
[49] Echt.C.S. and P.S.Chourey, Plant Physiol.,1985,79:530-536
Edgardo Echeverria, Charles D.Boyer, Paul A. Thomas, Kang-Chen Liu, and Jack C. Shannon
[50] Enzyme activities associated with maize kernel amyloplasts Plant Physiology, 1988,86:786~792
[51] Edwares A, Marshall J. Biochemical and characterisation of a novel starch synthase from potato tubers. Plant J.1996,8:283
[52] Edwaro L. Cox and David B. Dickinson. Hexokinase from maize endosperm and scutellum Plant physiology, 1973,51:960~966
[53] Erwin Beck and Paul Zieger Biosynthesie and degradation of starch in higher plants Ann.Rev.Plant physiol. Plant Mol., 1989,40:95~117
[54] F.E.Horan and M.F.Heider. Cereal chem. 1946,23:492
[55] Fisher.D.K.,C.D.Boyer and L.C.Hannah. Plant Physiol., 1993,102:1045-1046
[56] Fraser D.Macdonald and Jack Preiss.Partial Purification and Characterization of Granule-Bound Starch Synthases from Normal and Waxy Maize.Plant Physiol. (1985) 78, 849-852
[57] G.Eriksson Hereditas, 1969,63:180
[58] Greetje H. Vos-Scheperkeuter, Janny G. de Wit, Anne S.Ponstein, Will J.Feenstra and Bernard Witholt Immunological comparison of the starch branching enzymes from photo tubers and maize kernels Plant physiology, 1989,90:75~84
[59] Guan H.P. and J.Preiss. Plant Physiol., 1993,102:1269-1273
[60] Guan HP,Preiss J. Differentiation of the properties the branching isomes frem maize . Plant Physiol, 1993,102:1269-1273
[61] H.Wayne Polley Implications of atmospheric and climatic change for crop yield and water use efficiency. Crop science, 2002,42:131~140
[62] Han Ping Guan and Jack Preiss. Differentiation of the properties of the branching isozymes from Maize Plant physiology, 1993,102:1269~1273
[63] Hannah LC.,Nelson OE. Chanracterization of ADPG pyrophosphorylase from developing maize seeds Plant Physiol., 1975.55:297-302
[64] Hawker.J.S. Chang in the activities of enzymes concerned with sugar metabolism during the development of grape berries. Phytochem.,1969,8:9-18
[65] Hedman,K.D. and C.D.Boyer. Biochemical Genetics, 1966,53:661
[66] HG.Nass and P.L.Crane. Crop Sci., 1970,10:276
[67] Ian F. Wardlaw, and Johannes Willenbrink Carbohydrate storage and mobilization by the clum of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1994,21:255~271
[68] Ian F.Wardlaw and Johannes Willenbrink. Carbohydrate Storage and Mobilisation by the culm of Wheat between Heading and Grain Maturity:the Relation to Sucrose Synthase and Sucrose-phosphate Synthase. Aust. J. Plant Physiol, 1994,21,255-71
[69] J. L. Ozbun, J. S. Hawker, E. Greenberg, C. Lammel, and Jack Preiss Starch synthetase, Phosphorylase, ADPG-PPase, and UDPG-PPase in developing maize kernels Plant Physiology, 1973,51:1~5
[70] J.Y.Yeh, D.L.Garwood and J.C.Shannon. Staerke/Starch, 1981,33:222
[71] Jack C. Shannon, Fang-Mei Pien, and Kang-Chien Liu Nucleotides and nucleotide sugars in developing maize endosperm Plant physiology, 1996110:835~843
[72] Jack Preiss Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of starch Ann. Rev. Plant physiology, 1982,33:431~434
[73] James MG, Robertson Ds, Myers AM. Characterization of maize gene su1,a determinant of starch compoistion in kernels. Plant Cell, 1995,7:417
[74] Jane E. Ferguson, David B. Dickinson, and Ashby M. Rhodes Analysis of endosperm sugars in a sweet corn inbred which contains the sugary enchancer (se) gene and comparison of se with other corn genotypes Plant physiology, 1979,63:416~420
[75] Janine R. Studies of sugars and sorbitol in developing corn kernels. Plant Physiology.，1984, 75: 207-211[18]
[76] Jean-Louis Prioul, Emmanuelle Jeannette, Agnes Reyss.Expression of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase in Maize (Zea mays L.)Grain and Source Leaf during Grain filling. Plant Physiol.(1994)104:179-187
[77] Joan C. Swank, Frederick E. Below, Rober J. Lambert, and Richard H. Hageman Interaction of carbon and Nitrogen metabolism in the productivity of maize Plant physiology, 1982,70:1185~1190
[78] John R. Lauchnan. The effect of the sh2 fector on carbohydrate reseves in the maize endosperm of maize. Genetics 1983,38:485~499
[79] Jorge W. Gonzales, Ashby M. Rhodes, and David B. Dickinson Carbohydrate and enzymic characterization of a high sucrose sugary inbred line of sweet corn Plant physiology,1976,58:28~32
[80] K.B. Evensen and C.D.Boyer Carbohydrate composition and sensory quality of fresh and stored sweet corn Journal American.Soc.Hort.Sci.1986, 11195:734~738
[81] Kay Denyer, Francie Dunlap,Tine Thorbjernsen.The Major Form of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase in Maize Endosperm Is Extra-Plastidial.Plant Physiol.(1996)112:779-785
[82] Klosgen RB, Gierl A, Schwarz Z et al . Molecular analysis of waxy locus of maize. Mol: Gegenet, 1985,203:237
[83] Kouichi Mizuno, Tsutmu Kawsaaki, Hiroaki Shimada Alternation of the structural properties of starch components by the lack of an isoforn of starch branching enzyme in rice seeds The journal of biological chemistry, 1993,268:19084~19091
[84] Kuiper RB et al. Field evaluation of antisense RNA mediated inhibition of GBSS gene expression in potato. Euphytica, 1992,59:83
[85] Lavintamn N. The formation of branched glucan in sweet corn. Arch.. Biochem. Biophys. , 1966,116:1-8
[86] Lin TP., Caspar T, Preiss J. Isolation and characterization of starchless mutant of Arbidopsis thaliana Hegnh lacking ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity . Plant Physiol , 1988,86:1131-1135
[87] M. R. Campbell, P.J.White and L.M.Pollak Properties of sugary-2 maize starch:influence of exotic background Cereal chemistry, 1998,72(4):389~392
[88] M.J.Giroux, L.C.Hannah.ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in shrunken-2 and brittle-2 mutants of maize. Mol Gen Genet (1994) 243:400-408
[89] M.K. Morell, S. Rahman, A. Regina, R.Appels & Z. Li Wheat starch biosynthesis Euphytica,2001,119:55~58
[90] Marshall J. sSidebottom C. Identification of the major starch synthase in the soluble fraction of potato tubers. Plant Cell, 1996,6:1121-1135
[91] Martin C.Smith AM. Starch biosythesis Plant Cell, 1995,7:971-985
[92] Mericer, R.Charbonniere, D.Gallant, and A.Guilbot.,Staerke,1970,22:9
[93] Morrison W.R., Laignelet B. A improved colorimetric procedure for determinnig apparent and total amylose in cereal and other starches. J.Cereal.Sci.,1983,1:9-20
[94] Mu C.et al. Association of a 76 kd polypeptides with soluble starch synthase I activity in maize endosperm. Plant Jour., 1994,6:151
[95] Muller-Rober B, Kobnan J. , Approach to influence starch quantity and starch quality in transgentic plants .Plant Cell and Enviroment ,1994,17:601
[96] Nakamura Y, Kawaguchi K. Multiple forms of ADPG pyrophosphorylase of rice endosperm. Plant Physiol., 1991,84:336
[97] Nakamura Y, Umemoto T, Ogata N, et al. Starch debranching enzymes from developing rice endosperm purification, cDNA and chromosomal location of the gene. Planta, 1996,199:209
[98] Nathalie Gerrits Sucrose metabolism in plastids Plant physiology, 2001,125:926~934
[99] Nelson.OE.et.al. The enzymatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biolchem. Biophys.Res.Commun.,1962,9:297
[100] O.E.Nelson. Adv.Cereal.Sci.Technol. vol III ,1980,2:41-71
[101] O.H.Miller and E.E.Burns.,J.Food sci.1970,35:666
[102] Okita TW. Is there an alternative pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiol, 1992, 100:560-564
[103] Oliver E.Nelson Jr. and Benjamin Burr Biochemical genetics of higher plants Ann. Rev. Plant physiology, 1973,24:493~518
[104] Oliver Nelson and David Pan Starch synthesis in maize endosperms. Annu.Rev.Plant physiology. Plant Mol.boil.1995, 46:475~496
[105] P.J. Stone, D. R. Wilson, J.B. Reid and R. N. Gillespie Water deficit effects on sweet corn. I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth, and yield Aust. J. Agric. Res., 2001,52:103~113
[106] Pan D,Nelosn OE. A debranching enzyme defiency in endosperms of the su1 mutants of maize . Plant Physiol ,1984,74:324-328
[107] Peek NH et al. Sweet corn plant response to P and K in the soil and to ban-applied monoammonoum phosphate,Potassium sulfate and Magneisim sulfate. J.Amer. Soc.Hort. Sci., 1989,114:267-272
[108] Peggy Chevalier and Sarch E.Lingle Sugar metabolism in developing kernels of wheat and barley Crop science, 1983, 23:272~277
[109] Peter L Keeling, John R. Wood , R..Huw Tyson, and Ian G.Bridges Starch biosynthesis in developing wheat grain Plant physiology, 1988,87:311~319
[110] Petersen KL et al> Effect of tillage and irrigation on the growth and yield of sweet corn. Hort.Sci.,1984,19:596
[111] Plaxton WC, Preiss J, Purification and properties of nonproteolytc degraded ADPG pyrophosphorylase from maize endosperm. Plant Physiol ,1987, 83:105
[112] Preiss J. Biology and molecular biology of starch synthesis and it regulation . Oxf.Surv.Plant.Mol.Cell.Biol.,1991,7:59-114
[113] Prioul JL. Jeannette E , Reyss A. et al . Experssion of ADPG pyrophosphorylase in maize grain and source leaf during filling. Plant Physiol.,1994,107:179
[114] R.C.Black, J.D.Loerch,F.J.Mcardle and R.G.Creech,Genetics,1966,53:661
[115] R.G.Creech and F.J.Mcardle. Crop Sci.,1965,6:192
[116] R.M.Hixon Starch and Its Derivatives J.A.Radley,ed.,Chapman and Hall,London.4th Ed. 1968,p.247
[117] R.M.Soberalske and R.H.Andrew Gene effects on kernel moisteure and sugars of near-ioogenetic lines of sweet corn Crop science, 1978,18:743~746
[118] R.M.Soberalske and R.H.Andrew Gene effects on water soluble polysaccharides and starch of near-ioogenetic lines of sweet corn Crop science, 1980,20:201~204
[119] R.P.Brow, R.G.Creech and L.J.Johonson, crop sci.1971, 11:297
[120] R.Singh and B.O. Julicmo Plant physiol. 1977,59:417
[121] Robin Manelius, Hannu Maaheimo, Kari Nurmal, Eric Bertoft Characterisation of fraction obtained by isoamylolysis and ion-exchange chromatography of cationic Waxy starch Starch/saarke, 2002,54:58~65
[122] Rosali B. Frydman and C.E. Cardini Studies on the biosynthesis of starch The journal of biological chemistry, 1967,25:312~317
[123] Rowel B. Tobias, Charies D. Boyer, and Jack C. Shannon Alternations in carbohydrate intermediztes in the endosperm of starch-deficient maize genotypes Plant physiology, 1992,99:146~152
[124] S.Peat. W.J.Whelom, and J.R.Turvey. J.Chewm.Soc 1956,2317
[125] Shannon JC.,Pien F-M, LiuKC . Nucleotides and nucleotide sugars in developing maize endosperms synthesis of ADPG in bt-1. Plant Physiol .1996,110:835-843
[126] Smith AM.,Brttey M.,Bedford ID. Evidence that the rblocus alters the starch content of developing pea embryo though an effect on ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Plant Physiol, 1989,89:1279
[127] Smith-White BJ>,Preiss J.Comparison of proteins of of ADPG pyrophosphorylase from diverse sources. J.Mol.Evol.,1992,34:449-464
[128] Sprague GF,et al. Some effects of the waxy gene in corn on properties of the endosperm starch . J.Am.Soc.Agron, 1943,35:817
[129] Stark DM., Timmerman KP. et al. Regulation of the starch in plant tissue by ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Science, 1992,258:287
[130] Stark DM., Timmerman KP. Et al. Regulation of the starch in plant tissue by ADPG pyrophosphorylase. Science, 1992,258:287
[131] Steven C. Huber, Richard F. Wilson, and J.W. burton Studies on genetic male-sterile soybeans Plant physiology, 1983,73:713~717
[132] Steven C.Huber and Tskashi Akazawa A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells Plant physiology, 1986,81:1008~1013
[133] Stindrd,P.S.,D.S.Robertson and P.S.Schnable ,Plant Cell,1993,5:1555-1566
[134] T. Kasemsuwan, J. Jane, P. Schnable, P. Stinard and D. Robertson Characterization of the dominant mutant amylose-extender maize starch Cereal Chemistry, 1995,72 (5): 157~464
[135] T.D. Ugalde and C.F.Jenner Subrate gradients and regional patterns of dry matter deposition within developing wheat endosperm. I carbohydrates Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1990,17:377~394
[136] Takeda Y, Huan HP, Preiss J. Branching of amylose by the branching isoenzymes of maize endosperm. Carbohydr.Res.,1993,240:253-263
[137] Takeda Y., H.P.Guan and J.Preiss Carbohydr.Res.,1993,240:253-263
[138] Takeshi Yasul, Masaharu Seguch, maoyuki Ishikawa, Masaya Fujita Starch properties of waxy mutant line of hull-less Barley Starch/saarke, 2002,54:179~184
[139] Thomas D. Sullivan, Yasuko Kaneko The maize brittle gene encodes amyloplast membrane polypetides Planta, 1995,196:477~484
[140] Thomas W. Okita Is there an alternative pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiology, 1992,100:560~564
[141] Thomas W.Rufty, Jr. and Steven C. Huber Changes in starch formation and activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and cytoplasmic fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase in response to source-sink alternations Plant physiology, 1983,72:474~480
[142] Tsai CY.,Nelson OE. Starch-deficient maize mutant lacking ADPG pyrophosphorylase activity . Science, 1966,151:341-343
[143] Tsai.CY. Correlation of enzymatic zctivity with wx dosage. Maize gent.coop. Neuslett., 1965,39:153
[144] Tsan-Piao Lin, Timothy Caspar, Chris Somerville,and Jack Periss.Isolation and Characterization of a Starchless Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh Lacking ADPglucose Pyrophosphorylase Activity.Plant Physiol.(1988) 86.1131-1135
[145] V.L.Fergason, J.L.Helm, and M.S..Zuber, Crop Sci., 1966,6:273
[146] Villand P., Oleson OA. Kleczkowski LA. Molecular characterization of multiple cDNA clones for ADPG pyrophosphorylase from Arabidoposis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol., 1993, 23: 1279
[147] W.Banks, C.T.Greenwood and D.D.Muir, Staerke, 1974,26:289
[148] W.C.Mussulman and J.A.Wagoner. Cereal Chem., 1968,45:162
[149] Wang.Y.J. P.White, L.Pollak and J.Jane. Cereal Chem., 1993,7(2): 171-179
[150] Warren H. starch-synthesing enzymes in the endosperm and pollen of maize
[151] Weber H., Hein U, Borisjuk l et al. Cell type specific, coordinate expression of two ADPG pyrophosphorylase gene relation to starch biosynthesis during seed development of Vicia faba L. Planta, 1995,195:32
[152] Yan.S.H.,N.K.Matheson.,Carbohydr.Res.,1992,270:85-101
[153] Yasunori Nnkamura, kazuhiro Yukl, Shin-Young Park and Toshihide Ohya Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grains Plant cell physiology, 1989,30 (6): 833~839
[154] Ying Yu, Helen He Mu, Bruce P.Wasserman, and George M.Carman.Identification of the Maize Amyloplast Stromal 112-KD Protein as a Plastidic Starch Phosphorylase.Plant Physiology,January 2001,Vol.125,pp.351-359
[155] Ying Yu, Helen He Mu, Chen Mu-Forster, and Bruce P.Wasserman Polypeptides of the maize amyloplast stroma Plant physiology, 1998,116:1451~1460
[156] Yoshito Watanabe, Yasunori Nakamura and Ryuichi Ishii Relationship between starch accumulation and activities of the related enzymes in the leaf sheath as a temporary sink orange in rice Aust. J. plant physiology, 1997,24:563~569
[157] 包劲松. 基因工程改良作物淀粉品质. 上海农业学报，1198，14（1）：90~96
[158] 蔡大同，苑泽圣，杨桂芬等. 氮肥不同时期施用对优质小麦产量和加工品质的影响. 土壤肥料，1994，2： 19～21
[159] 蔡大同，张春兰，蒋廷惠等. 氮，钾肥对饼干小麦植株各部分干物质和养分含量的作用.土壤肥料1998,（4）：12～15
[160] 曹敏建，孙国鹃. 玉米高产栽培的加速生理作用. 玉米科学，1998，6(1)，66～68
[161] 陈范骏，曹敏建，陈艳如. 玉米对氮素营养利用的遗传差异及其生理机制[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报，1998，29（4）：314~318
[162] 陈国平. 玉米的干物质生产与分配. 玉米科学，1994，2（1）：48~53
[163] 陈锦新，张国平 氮，钾用量与配比对大麦籽粒品质的影响 浙江农业学报，2000，12（2）：74～77
[164] 陈文华. 氮肥运筹方法对稻茬免耕大麦产量和品质的影响 浙江农业大学学报，1995，21(1)：41-48
[165] 陈英取. 氮磷钾用量及配比对甜玉米产量与品质的影响. 华南农业大学学报. 1993，14(1):33-38.
[166] 陈永新，翟广谦，田福海. 甜玉米速冻加工技术研究[J].玉米科学，1998，4:73~76
[167] 程素贞，王秀功. 钾肥对小麦氮，磷，钾的吸收分配及产量，品质的关系[J]. 安徽农业大学学报，1982，20（3）：252~259
[168] 程素贞，谢淑芸. 氮肥对啤酒大麦ZN、MN、 FE、 MO 营养效应的研究[J]. 土壤通报，1999，30(2):71~73.
[169] 楚铃，陆发熹，刘数基. 氮钾肥配施对赤红壤上甜玉米生长影响的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报，1989，10（3）：42~51
[170] 崔彦宏，周海，李伯航. 甜玉米籽粒的营养品质及影响因素[J]，河北农业大学学报，1996，19（4）：99~104
[171] 戴良香 冬小麦氮素营养特性及其影响因素 河北职业技术师范学院学报，1997，11（4）：65～70
[172] 杜金哲，李文雄，白祥和等. 春小麦籽粒蛋白质积累和产量形成规律及施氮的调节作用.东北农业大学学报，1999，30（1）：1～9
[173] 杜金哲，李文雄，胡尚连等. 春小麦不同品质类型氮的吸收，转化利用及与籽粒产量和蛋白质的关系. 作物学报，2001，27（2）：253～260
[174] 范仲学，王璞，粱振兴. 利用同位素示踪研究夏玉米灌浆期同化产物的运转. 核农学报（Acta Agriculture Nucleatae Science），2001，15(1)：32-37
[175] 高振宇，黄大年. 植物支链淀粉合成的关健酶――淀粉分支酶. 生物工程进展，1998，18（8）：29～31
[176] 何成辉，何天秀.钾肥对啤酒大麦品质的影响研究[J].土壤通报，1991，22（1）：44~46
[177] 何萍，金继运，林葆 不同氮磷钾用量下春玉米生物产量及其组分动态与养分吸收模式研究 植物营养与肥料学报 1998，4（2）123～130
[178] 何萍，金继运，林葆. 玉米高产施肥营养生理研究进展[J]. 玉米科学，1998，6（2）：72~75
[179] 何萍，金继运. 氮钾营养对春玉米叶片衰老过程中激素变化与酶活性代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1999，5（4）：289~296
[180] 何中虎 糯小麦的研究概况 作物杂志，1999（2）7～9
[181] 洪建，黎军英，高其康，蒋德英 钾营养影响水道叶绿体的形态定量分析 浙江农业大学学报，1998，24（S）1～4
[182] 胡昌浩 ，玉米栽培生理，中国农业出版社，1995
[183] 黄金宝，张恩和，胡恒觉 不同玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的生理生态机制 植物营养与肥料学报，2001，7（3）293～297
[184] 贾振华，李华. 施肥对小麦产量与品质形成影响的研究 河南职技师院学报，1990，18(3，4)：91-95
[185] 钾肥对啤酒大麦品质的影响研究 土壤通报 1991，22(1)：44-46
[186] 姜东，于振文，李永庚等. 冬小麦开花前后茎和叶鞘中贮存的碳水化合物含量的变化[J]. 植物生理学通讯，2000，36（6）：507~511
[187] 姜东，于振文，李永庚等. 冬小麦叶茎粒可溶性糖含量变化及其与籽粒淀粉积累的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报，2001，21（3）:38~41
[188] 蒋德安，绕立华，彭佐权.钾对水稻产量形成的一些生理效应[J].浙江农业大学学报，1987，13(4):441~444
[189] 金继运，何萍. 氮钾互作对春玉米生物产量及其组分动态的影响 玉米科学，1999，7（4）：57～60
[190] 金继运，何萍. 氮钾营养对春玉米后期碳氮代谢与粒重形成的影响 中国农业科学，1999，22（4）55～62
[191] 赖庆旺. 红壤土施钾对粮食作物品质的影响. 化肥工业，1989，3：24-26
[192] 蓝新伟，江素琼. 鲜食期甜玉米采后营养成分风味和呼吸强度的变化[J].中国蔬菜，1993，32（1）：13~16
[193] 李华，杨肖娥，罗安程. 不同氮钾条件下水稻基因型氮，钾积累利用差异. 中国水稻科学（Chinese journal of rice science，2002，16(1):86～88
[194] 李金才，魏风珍 氮素营养对小麦产量和籽粒蛋白质及组分含量的影响 中国粮油学报，2001，16（2）6～8
[195] 李金才，魏风珍. 氮素营养对小麦产量和籽粒蛋白质及组分含量的影响.中国粮油学报，2001，16（2）6～8
[196] 李晓亮， 我国特用型玉米育种的进展及综合利用。安徽农学通报，1998.4.（1）： 29～32
[197] 李孝良 氮磷钾肥对小麦生长发育及品质的影响 安徽农业技术师范学院学报，1998，12（4）：12～14
[198] 李孝良. 氮磷钾肥对小麦生长发育及品质的影响. 安徽农业技术师范学院学报，1998，12（4）：12～14
[199] 李新海，焦少杰. 甜玉米品质的遗传改良[J].黑龙江农业科学，1996，3：34~36
[200] 李学渊， 玉米突变基因与互作对子粒成分的影响，作物学报，1993，19（5）
[201] 李宗智. 玉米品质的遗传改良. 河北农业大学学报，1984，12（7）：29～39
[202] 李宗智. 玉米品质的遗传改良. 河北农业大学学报，1984，12（7）：29～39
[203] 林琳，特用玉米的发展前景。作物研究，1994.8（3）：44～46
[204] 刘保国，任昌福 水稻品种直链淀粉的积累特性与WX蛋白的关系 西南农业大学学报，1989，11（4）：378-382
[205] 刘建祥，杨肖娥，吴良欢等. 低钾胁迫对水稻叶片光合功能的影响及其基因型差异. 作物学报，2001，27（6）：1000～1006
[206] 刘冶先. 世界玉米经济的研究现状和发展趋势。国外文学—杂粮作物。1998.18（2）：7～11
[207] 刘治先，玉米油及优质油玉米育种，玉米科学，1996，3：16-18
[208] 鲁剑巍 钾，硫肥配施对作物产量与品质的影响 土壤通报 1994，25 (5)：216-218
[209] 陆庆，蒋德安，翁晓燕等. 钾营养对不同水稻基因型物质生产和光合作用的效应. 浙江农业大学学报，1999，25（3），267～270
[210] 米国华，刘建安，张福锁 玉米氮效率生理生化基础及遗传改良进展 玉米科学 1997，5（2）：9～13
[211] 敏建，戴俊英，邱忠祥. 钾对玉米叶片物质代谢及产量的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报，1992，23 (1)：7~16
[212] 欧阳华民，曹一平，王敬国等. 叶面施肥和遮荫对玉米叶施15N的吸收和分配的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4（2）：188~191
[213] 上官周平 氮素营养对旱作小麦光合特性的调控 植物营养与肥料学报，1997，3（2）：105～109
[214] 沈同 生物化学 高等教育出版社1981
[215] 沈伟其. 钾素对杂交水稻个体及群体的生理效应[J].浙江农业大学学报， 1987，14(4):101~106
[216] 石德权，我国优质蛋白玉米研究取得新进展。作物杂志，1995，1：2-5
[217] 石孝均 锌，锰与含氯氮肥配施对冬小麦子粒营养品质的影响 植物营养与肥料学(2)报.1997，3(2):160-168.
[218] 史振声 钾肥对甜玉米子粒品质和茎干含糖量的影响 玉米科学. 1994，2(1):76-80.
[219] 宋同明，发展我国特用玉米产业的意义，潜力和方向。玉米科学，1996.（10）：6～11
孙振，李京红，于同泉 玉米胚乳不同糯质基因型对总淀粉及支链淀粉含量的影响. 浙江农业
[220] 大学学报，1999，25（3），267～270
[221] 索全义，赵利梅，迟玉亭. 氮肥对春玉米籽粒建成及品质形成的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）：197~201
[222] 唐湘如，官春云. 几种酶活性与油菜油分和蛋白质及产量的关系. 湖南农业大学学报，（journal of hunan agriculture university）2000，26(1):37~40
[223] 唐湘如，谭中文，李之林等. CPPU和PP333对杂交稻3个淀粉合成酶活性和米质的影响. 杂交水稻，（HYBRID RICE）2002，17(3):44~46
[224] 腾应，钱晓刚，何腾兵，陆引罡 玉米不同基因型对钾营养胁迫的反应 耕作与栽培，2001，2：43～45
[225] 佟屏亚，凌碧莹. 夏玉米氮，磷，钾积累和分配态势研究[J].玉米科学，1994，2（2）：65~69
[226] 佟屏亚，玉米综合利用的发展策略和方向。农业科技通讯，1991.（11）：10
[227] 王春枝，葛海峰，姚刚等. 钾肥对春玉米氮磷钾吸收动态模型及养分生产效率影响的研究. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）148～152
[228] 王德仁，卢婉芳，陈苇.施氮对稻米蛋白质，氨基酸含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报，2001，7（3）353～356
[229] 王立秋. 小麦品质生理研究进展[J]. 国外农学－麦类作物，1996，3：31~32
[230] 王朋文，戴俊英，赵桂坤.玉米种植密度对产量何品质的影响[J].玉米科学，1996，4（4）：
[231] 王旭东，于振文，范广华等. 钾素对冬小麦品质和产量的影响. 山东农业科学，2000，3：16~18
[232] 王永锐，李卫军 耐低钾基因型水稻品种孕穗期剑叶生理及根系活力 生态科学1997，16(1)67～70
[233] 王永锐，周洁. 杂交水稻穗期氮钾营养对剑叶生理特性的影响 中国水稻科学，1997，11（3）
[234] 王玉兰， 国内外爆裂玉米遗传育种研究动态。吉林农业大学学报，1998.20（4）：99～102
[235] 位东斌，林琪，王志良.中后期追氮对小麦叶片氮含量及籽粒产量何蛋白质含量的影响[J].河南职技师院学报，1990，18（3）97~101
[236] 魏益民. 小麦品质的评价及品质改良. 陕西农业科学，1989，1：47~49
[237] 吴巍 ，张宽，王秀芳等. 钾肥对玉米的增产增收效果与利用率[J].玉米科学，1998，6（1）：61~65
[238] 吴晓峻 尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶. 植物生理学通讯，2000，36（3）：193-200
[239] 夏培帧，王少仁. 氮磷肥对小麦，玉米子粒氨基酸的影响 土壤肥料 ，1995，2：9-13
[240] 肖凯，张荣铣，钱维朴. 氮素营养对小麦群体光合碳同化作用的影响及其调控机制. 植物营养与肥料学报，1999，5（3）：235～243
[241] 谢志新 氮肥用量对大麦氮代谢和子粒品质的效应. 浙江农业大学学报.1989，15(1):1-7
[242] 许崇香， 糯质玉米的研究进展。玉米科学.1995.3（3）：16～18
[243] 杨 杰. 氮钾互作对马铃薯产量，品质与氮磷钾吸收的影响. 华南农业大学学报.1993，14(1):28-32.
[244] 杨太兴，曾孟潜 玉米胚乳和胚发育过程中物质积累和同工酶和蛋白质的变化， 植物生理学报，1984，10（1）：77-89
[245] 姚源喜，杨延蕃，邓迎海. 施肥对冬小麦和夏玉米氨基酸和蛋白质含量的影响 莱阳农学院学报，1991，8(1)8-10
[246] 于振文，作物栽培学，中国农业出版社，1995
[247] 曾三省，爆裂玉米的开发利用，农业科技通讯.1987，4(9)：12
[248] 翟风林. 作物品质育种 中国农业出版社，1992
[249] 翟广谦，陈永新，田福海. 速冻保鲜甜、糯玉米营养品质分析. 山西农业科学，1997，25（3）：49~51
[250] 翟广谦，陈永新，田福海. 甜，糯玉米鲜食期品质变化及保鲜技术研究[J].山西农业科学，1997，25（1）：24~27
[251] 张福锁，米国华，刘建安 玉米氮效率遗传改良及其应用 农业生物技术学报1997，5（2）113～116
[252] 张国平，张光恒. 小麦氮素利用效率的基因型差异研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报，1996，2（4）332~336
[253] 张冀涛 不同栽培条件与小麦子粒品质的关系 干旱地区农业研究，1991，2：16-21
[254] 张敬涛.不同啤麦品种与氮磷钾肥的综合效应. 土壤肥料，1997（4）：26～28
[255] 张铭堂 玉米之遗传，科学农业，1994，42（5，6）：120-132
[256] 赵例梅，王贵平，高炳德，孟德 氮磷钾平衡施肥对春玉米籽粒 建成及品质形成的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报 2000，21（S）：16～20
[257] 赵例梅，王贵平，高炳德等. 氮磷钾平衡施肥对春玉米籽粒建成及品质形成的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报，2000，21（S）：16～20
[258] 植物营养与品质
[259] 周顺利，张福锁，王兴仁等. 高产条件下不同品种冬小麦氮素营养吸收与利用特性的比较研究. 土壤肥料，2000（6）：20～24
[260] 周晓芬，张彦才，李巧云. 不同供钾源及其用量对钾素营养的影响. 土壤通报，（chinese journal of soil science）2001，32(1)32~34
[261] 周兆德，李田贵，黄启为等. 磷钾配比对叶类蔬菜产量和品质德影响[J].湖南农业大学学报，1991，17(s):395~399
[262] 庄铁成，高淀粉玉米的遗传与育种，玉米科学，1996，4：12-14
[263] 邹春琴，李春俭，张福锁等. 铁和不同形态氮素对玉米植株吸收矿质元素及其在体内分布的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报，1996，2（1）：68~73
[264] 邹国元，杨志福，李晓林. 钾对玉米苗期抗冷性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4（2）165～169
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |