准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系层序特征及有利区带选择
|
摘要
准噶尔盆地腹部主要目的层侏罗系形成于地形平缓的大型坳陷盆地中心地带,油气藏不仅仅受构造的控制,岩性在油气成藏过程中起到相当重要的作用,所形成的非构造圈闭包括上倾尖灭圈闭、三角洲分支河道砂岩岩性圈闭以及地层超覆圈闭等。
论文通过对侏罗系这种平缓地形中形成的层序地层格架内沉积体系类型、储层特征、油气藏成藏条件及特征等方面的研究,探讨层序对地层油气藏的控制作用,进而指导研究区有利勘探区带的选择和评价。
鉴于腹部地区面积大,钻井少,地震测网密度稀,论文中充分利用周边和凸起的钻/测井资料,以区域钻井、地震资料为基础,运用层序地层学理论与分析技术,建立了准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系三级层序地层格架。研究认为,研究区侏罗系6 个三级层序均形成于平缓斜坡背景之中,但根据古地形、气候等古地理因素特征的不同,可以归结为三种古地理沉积背景:潮湿气候具平缓坡折平缓斜坡背景(Sq1,Sq2,Sq4)、潮湿气候平缓斜坡背景(Sq3)、干旱气候具平缓坡折平缓斜坡背景(Sq5,Sq6),相应地出现不同的层序特征。通过岩心微相、测井相、地震相、物源等沉积学方面的研究,发现在三种不同的古地理背景中,从盆地边缘至盆地中心分别形成不同的沉积体系组合:曲流河(泛滥平原)—三角洲平原(滨岸湖沼)—滨浅湖沉积体系组合;辫状河—辨状河三角洲平原、前缘—浅湖—半深湖沉积体系组合;三角洲平原—滨浅湖(前缘)—浅湖沉积体系组合。
在地层格架内,本文利用微观实验手段,对钻井岩心资料比较丰富的地区(如中部Ⅰ区块庄1 井区、中部Ⅳ区块董1 井)开展了储集层微观特征分析,探讨控制储层发育及储集性能的地质因素,把控制本区砂岩储集性能的因素归结为沉积微相类型、低地温场、早期浅埋后期快速掩埋的埋藏环境以及埋藏过程中的成岩作用。通过对油源条件、盖层条件、储盖组合、油气运移等油气藏基本条件方面的研究,建立起了本区油气藏成藏模式,并认为控制研究区侏罗系油气藏形成的因素有三个:一是圈闭的落实;二是该圈闭是否位于油气输导路径上;三是储层质量。
综合以上各方面的研究成果认为,层序地层格架内,在不同的沉积时期、不同的古地理位置形成了不同特征的沉积体系,进而控制着地层圈闭的形成、储层宏观分布和特征、控制了油气封隔层和运移通道,并最终控制大量隐蔽油气藏的分布。有利区带的选择原则与控制油气藏形成的三个因素密切相关,即有利区带需要具备较好的储层发育条件、具有形成有利圈闭的地质条件、并且所形成的有利圈闭应该位于油气输导路径中。据此,本文圈定出中部各区块层序地层格架内各层序的有利勘探区带。
Junggar basin has good oil and gas potential, however, the source rocks are deeply buried, with poorly developed positive elements. During the deposition of the Jurassic system, the major exploration-target interval, the basin was wide, shallow, and smooth, with multiple cycles of alternately deposited sand stone and clay. The sand stone intervals were scattered in the vertical direction extending horizontally in limited distance. Exploration results from a few wells show that, oil and gas in the center of the basin are controlled not only by the geological structures but also by the lithology. The non-structural traps discovered in the basin include upwarding check out trap, lithologic trap and stratigraphic overlap trap.
Through the systematic study of the depositonal systems, reservoir characteristics, and the formation of oil and gas traps in the gently dipped Jurrasic intervals in the basin, this paper discusses the control of the stratigraphic sequences on the oil and gas resource gathering, and provides guidance to the selection and evaluation of the favorable exploration targets.
The central part of Junggar basin has huge unexplored area, with few drilling wells and highly scattered seismic exploration. Based on the wells and seismic data constructed,the sequence stratigraphic theory and techniques are used to build the sequence stratigraphic frame of Jurassic in the center of the basin, which consists of 2 2nd and 7 3rd sequences. During the construction of the frame, the author fully used the well logs of peripheral area and salient of the basin as aid and reference. The research results show that all the 6 3rd sequences of Jurassic were formed in the gently dipped slope. However, due to the difference in dead forms and palaeoclimate,their deposition environments can be divided into three palaeogeographic groups:gentle dipped slope with a gentle break in a humid climate(Sq1,Sq2,Sq4); gentle dipped slope in a humid climate (Sq3); gentle dipped slope with a gentle break in an arid climate (Sq5,Sq6)). Accordingly, each group has different stratigraphic characteristics. Through the study of cores, logs, seismic crosses and provenances,this research has discovered that in the three different palaeogeographic groups,different deposition systems were formed from the verge to the center of the basin: meander river-delta plain-shallow lake; braided river-delta plain with braided rivers and delta front-shallow lake-deep lake;delta plain-shallow lake.
In the sequence frame,micro-experimental techniques are used to do a detailed characteristic analysis of the reservoirs in the area where cores are available, for example, Zhuang1 in the 1st region and Dong1 in the 4th region.,and to discuss the geological factors that control the reservoir development and reservoir quality. It
shows that the factors controlling the quality of the reservoir sandstone include sedimentary facies, the surrounding environment under low geothermal gradient and diagenesis. Through the study of source rocks, cap rocks, the combination of reservoir sandstone and cap rocks, migration, etc., the authors has constructed models for the formation of the oil and gas traps in the studied area. It is believed that three factors control the formation of Jurrasic oil and gas traps in the studied area: the existence of traps, the location of the traps in the oil and gas transfer path, and the reservoir quality. In summary, results from this research show that the sequence frame,in which different deposition systems are formed in the different deposition time and different palaeogeographic position, controls the formation of stratigraphic traps, the distribution and characteristics of the reservoirs、confining layers and migration passages,and, hence, controls the distribution of many obscure oil and gas reservoirs. The favorite areas are selected for all the 6 sequences in the studied area..The selection of favorite exploration target area is closely related to the three factors that controls the oil and gas reservoirs,i.e., the favorite area should have high quality reservoir rocks, there are available traps, and the traps exists in the migration passages.
论文通过对侏罗系这种平缓地形中形成的层序地层格架内沉积体系类型、储层特征、油气藏成藏条件及特征等方面的研究,探讨层序对地层油气藏的控制作用,进而指导研究区有利勘探区带的选择和评价。
鉴于腹部地区面积大,钻井少,地震测网密度稀,论文中充分利用周边和凸起的钻/测井资料,以区域钻井、地震资料为基础,运用层序地层学理论与分析技术,建立了准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系三级层序地层格架。研究认为,研究区侏罗系6 个三级层序均形成于平缓斜坡背景之中,但根据古地形、气候等古地理因素特征的不同,可以归结为三种古地理沉积背景:潮湿气候具平缓坡折平缓斜坡背景(Sq1,Sq2,Sq4)、潮湿气候平缓斜坡背景(Sq3)、干旱气候具平缓坡折平缓斜坡背景(Sq5,Sq6),相应地出现不同的层序特征。通过岩心微相、测井相、地震相、物源等沉积学方面的研究,发现在三种不同的古地理背景中,从盆地边缘至盆地中心分别形成不同的沉积体系组合:曲流河(泛滥平原)—三角洲平原(滨岸湖沼)—滨浅湖沉积体系组合;辫状河—辨状河三角洲平原、前缘—浅湖—半深湖沉积体系组合;三角洲平原—滨浅湖(前缘)—浅湖沉积体系组合。
在地层格架内,本文利用微观实验手段,对钻井岩心资料比较丰富的地区(如中部Ⅰ区块庄1 井区、中部Ⅳ区块董1 井)开展了储集层微观特征分析,探讨控制储层发育及储集性能的地质因素,把控制本区砂岩储集性能的因素归结为沉积微相类型、低地温场、早期浅埋后期快速掩埋的埋藏环境以及埋藏过程中的成岩作用。通过对油源条件、盖层条件、储盖组合、油气运移等油气藏基本条件方面的研究,建立起了本区油气藏成藏模式,并认为控制研究区侏罗系油气藏形成的因素有三个:一是圈闭的落实;二是该圈闭是否位于油气输导路径上;三是储层质量。
综合以上各方面的研究成果认为,层序地层格架内,在不同的沉积时期、不同的古地理位置形成了不同特征的沉积体系,进而控制着地层圈闭的形成、储层宏观分布和特征、控制了油气封隔层和运移通道,并最终控制大量隐蔽油气藏的分布。有利区带的选择原则与控制油气藏形成的三个因素密切相关,即有利区带需要具备较好的储层发育条件、具有形成有利圈闭的地质条件、并且所形成的有利圈闭应该位于油气输导路径中。据此,本文圈定出中部各区块层序地层格架内各层序的有利勘探区带。
Junggar basin has good oil and gas potential, however, the source rocks are deeply buried, with poorly developed positive elements. During the deposition of the Jurassic system, the major exploration-target interval, the basin was wide, shallow, and smooth, with multiple cycles of alternately deposited sand stone and clay. The sand stone intervals were scattered in the vertical direction extending horizontally in limited distance. Exploration results from a few wells show that, oil and gas in the center of the basin are controlled not only by the geological structures but also by the lithology. The non-structural traps discovered in the basin include upwarding check out trap, lithologic trap and stratigraphic overlap trap.
Through the systematic study of the depositonal systems, reservoir characteristics, and the formation of oil and gas traps in the gently dipped Jurrasic intervals in the basin, this paper discusses the control of the stratigraphic sequences on the oil and gas resource gathering, and provides guidance to the selection and evaluation of the favorable exploration targets.
The central part of Junggar basin has huge unexplored area, with few drilling wells and highly scattered seismic exploration. Based on the wells and seismic data constructed,the sequence stratigraphic theory and techniques are used to build the sequence stratigraphic frame of Jurassic in the center of the basin, which consists of 2 2nd and 7 3rd sequences. During the construction of the frame, the author fully used the well logs of peripheral area and salient of the basin as aid and reference. The research results show that all the 6 3rd sequences of Jurassic were formed in the gently dipped slope. However, due to the difference in dead forms and palaeoclimate,their deposition environments can be divided into three palaeogeographic groups:gentle dipped slope with a gentle break in a humid climate(Sq1,Sq2,Sq4); gentle dipped slope in a humid climate (Sq3); gentle dipped slope with a gentle break in an arid climate (Sq5,Sq6)). Accordingly, each group has different stratigraphic characteristics. Through the study of cores, logs, seismic crosses and provenances,this research has discovered that in the three different palaeogeographic groups,different deposition systems were formed from the verge to the center of the basin: meander river-delta plain-shallow lake; braided river-delta plain with braided rivers and delta front-shallow lake-deep lake;delta plain-shallow lake.
In the sequence frame,micro-experimental techniques are used to do a detailed characteristic analysis of the reservoirs in the area where cores are available, for example, Zhuang1 in the 1st region and Dong1 in the 4th region.,and to discuss the geological factors that control the reservoir development and reservoir quality. It
shows that the factors controlling the quality of the reservoir sandstone include sedimentary facies, the surrounding environment under low geothermal gradient and diagenesis. Through the study of source rocks, cap rocks, the combination of reservoir sandstone and cap rocks, migration, etc., the authors has constructed models for the formation of the oil and gas traps in the studied area. It is believed that three factors control the formation of Jurrasic oil and gas traps in the studied area: the existence of traps, the location of the traps in the oil and gas transfer path, and the reservoir quality. In summary, results from this research show that the sequence frame,in which different deposition systems are formed in the different deposition time and different palaeogeographic position, controls the formation of stratigraphic traps, the distribution and characteristics of the reservoirs、confining layers and migration passages,and, hence, controls the distribution of many obscure oil and gas reservoirs. The favorite areas are selected for all the 6 sequences in the studied area..The selection of favorite exploration target area is closely related to the three factors that controls the oil and gas reservoirs,i.e., the favorite area should have high quality reservoir rocks, there are available traps, and the traps exists in the migration passages.
引文
[1] 鲍志东,管守锐,李儒峰,王英民,刘凌,赵秀岐,齐雪峰.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层学研究.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):48-52
[2] 常秋生.影响准噶尔盆地碎屑岩储层储集性的主要因素. 新疆石油学院学报, 2003,15(3):18-21
[3] 德勒达尔,任军民.准噶尔盆地卡因迪克侏罗系齐古组储层沉积特征.新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(1):1-4
[4] 邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质,1995, 16(2): 90～97
[5] 丁卫星,马英俊,刘红正.准噶尔盆地Z1 井区沉积微相研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(2):8-9
[6] 高新生,赵霞飞,李天明,唐忠华.准噶尔盆地西部侏罗系层序地层特征.石油天然气与地质,2001,22(2):165-168
[7] 谷云飞,马明福,苏世龙,徐怀民,胡斌,姚卫江.准噶尔盆地白垩系岩相古地理.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):337-3343
[8] 管守锐,李儒峰,王英民,刘凌,赵秀岐,齐雪峰.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层学研究鲍志东,石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):48-51
[9] 胡宗全、朱筱敏、彭勇民.准噶尔盆地西北缘车排子地区侏罗系物源及古水流分析.古地理学报,2002,8(1):23-28
[10]胡宗全,李明娟.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系层序模拟与沉积相演化特征.石油天然气与地质,2003,24(4):351-356
[11]胡宗全,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系储集物性的主要控制因素 .成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):152-156
[12]胡宗全,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系储层成岩作用及孔隙演化. 石油大学学报 (自然科学版 ),2002,26(3):16-20
[13]况军,姚根顺,朱国华,寿建峰,王鑫.准噶尔盆地腹部地区侏罗系三工河组相对优质储集层的成因石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):34-40
[14]况军,唐勇,朱国华,崔炳富.准噶尔盆地侏罗系储集层的基本特征及其主控因素分析.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):52-56
[15]李振宏 ,汤良杰 ,丁文龙 ,姚素平.准噶尔盆地腹部地区断裂特征分析.石油勘探与开发, 2002,29(1):40-43
[16]李振宏.准噶尔盆地腹部地区断裂特征浅析.新疆石油学院学报,2001,13(3):2000-2003
[17]李学义,邵雨,李天明.准噶尔盆地南缘三个油气成藏组合研究.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(6):32-34
[18]刘豪,王英民,王媛.浅析准噶尔盆地侏罗系煤层在层序地层中的意义.沉积学报,2002,20(2):197-202
[19]刘洛夫,康永尚,齐雪峰,唐勇,熊正祥.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层格架中的烃源岩评价.沉积学报,2002,20(4):687-694
[20] 柳永清,李寅.准噶尔盆地侏罗系露头层序地层及沉积学特征。地球学报,2001,22(1):49~54
[21]罗凯声.2003. 不整合研究在准噶尔盆地勘探中的作用.新疆石油地质,24(6):543-545
[22] 蒲仁海,梅志超,唐忠华.准噶尔盆地东部侏罗系陆相层序地层初探[J].新疆石油地质,1994,15(4):335-341
[23]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,齐雪峰,王媛.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学—中国地质大学学报 ,2002,27(6):683-688
[24]王宜林,康永尚. 2003. 准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序格架中油气藏的分布规律及其主控因素. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),27(5):1-7
[25]王红亮,邓宏文,孙德君.准噶尔盆地南缘层序地层特征与有利含气区带预测.石油实验地质,2000,22(4):336-340
[26]王文军,何禹斌.准噶尔盆地Z1 井油源对比研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(增刊):24-26
[27]王卓飞,蒋宜勤,祝嗣全.准噶尔盆地侏罗系低渗透油气储层特征及成因探讨.断块油气田,2003,10(5):23-27
[28]魏魁生,徐怀大,叶淑芬 ,等 .松辽盆地白垩系高分辨率层序地层格架.石油与天然气地质 , 1997, 18( 1) :7-14.
[29]吴金才,张建中,石好果,王离迟,孟闲龙,朱允辉.准噶尔盆地腹部复合圈闭成藏特征研究.石油实验地质,2003,25(6):735-740
[30]吴孔友 ,查明 ,洪梅.准噶尔盆地不整合结构的地球物理响应及油气成藏意义.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):328-333
[31]夏显佰,陈布科,王鑫,斯春松,寿建峰.准噶尔盆地马桥凸起区J1s 沉积物源分析.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(3):13-15
[32]杨永泰,王社教,培东宏,邢娅. 准噶尔盆地腹部深层成藏条件及勘探领域分析. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(4):32-34
[33]杨建业,任德贻,邵龙义. 沉积有机相在陆相层序地层格架中的分布特征———以吐哈盆地台北凹陷及准噶尔盆地南缘中侏罗世煤系为例. 沉积学报,2000,18(4):585-589
[34]张满郎,顾新元,张琴,詹家祯.准噶尔盆地彩参 2 井侏罗纪孢粉化石及层序地层分析.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(1):16-23
[35]张满郎,张琴,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层划分探讨.石油实验地质,2000,22(3):236-241
[36]张满郎,朱筱敏,张琴.准噶尔盆地东部侏罗系沉积体系及油气意义.石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):272-278 张琴,王贵文,朱筱敏,张满郎.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系测井沉积相.古地理学报,2003,3(3):41-47
[38]张琴,朱筱敏,张满郎.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系地震相研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(1):72-78
[39]张年富,齐雪峰,王英民,刘豪,王媛.准噶尔盆地侏罗系Ⅲ层序底界上下砂体预测与有利区评价.石油天然气与地质,2002,23(2):145-149
[40]张义杰,柳广弟.准噶尔盆地复合油气系统特征、演化与油气勘探方向.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):36-39
[41]赵玉光,丘东洲.西准噶尔界山前陆盆地晚期 (T -J)层序地层与油气勘探.新疆石油地质 , 1993, 14( 4) :323- 331.钟大康,朱筱敏,文应初.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡侏罗系砂岩成岩作用、孔隙演化及次生孔隙预测.中国海上油气(地质),2003,17(4):249-251
[43]朱筱敏,康安,张琴,张满郎,况军,吴晓智,韩军.2002.准噶尔盆地东北缘侏罗系含煤岩系层序地层和隐蔽圈闭.石油与天然气地质, 23(2):121-126
[44] Wilgus, C.K., Posamentier, H.W., Hasting,B.S., 等著.徐怀大、魏魁生、洪卫东等译.层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)[C].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.1～515)
[45] Blum M D, et al. Fluvial response to climate and sea-level change: a review and look forword. Sedimentology, 2000, 47(Suppl. 1): 2-48
[46] Bull W B. Geomorphic responses to climatic change: New York, Oxford University Press: 1991, 326P
[47] Cross T A, Lessenge M A et al., Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high resolution stratigraphic correlation. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications. NPE Special Publication, 1998,8:171～195
[48] Fielding C R. Varieties of fluvial form: the relevance to geologists of an expanded reality. In: Varieties of Fluvial Form (Ed: by A J Miller and A Gupta), 1999, John Wiley. Chichester. P497-505
[49] Galloway W E; Hobday D K. Terrigenous clastic depositional systems: applications to fossil fuel and groundwater resources SPRINGER-VERLAG, 1996 (ISBN 3-540-60232-1; 2ND EDITION; 50
[50] Galloway W E. Silicicalstic slope and base-of-slope depositional systems: component facies, stratigraphic architecture, and calssification. AAPG Bulletin, 1998, 82(4):569-595
[51] Koss J E, Ethridge F G, Schumm S A. An experimental study of the effects of base level change on fluvial, coastal plain and shelf system. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1994,,64(2):90-98
[52] Lemons D R; Chan M A. Facies architecture and sequence stratigraphy of fine-grained lacustrine deltas along The eastern margin of Late Pleistocene Lake Bonneville, Northern Utah and Southern Idaho. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83( 4) 635-665
[53] Martisen O J, Ryseth A et al., Stratigraphic base level and fluvial architecture: ericson sandstone. SEDIMENTOLOGY. 1999, 46(2):235-259
[54] Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphy correlation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1991, 61:497-505
[55] Olsen H. Orbital forcing on continental depositional systems-lacustrine and fluvial cyclicity in the Devonian of East Greenland. In: Orbital Forcing and Cyclic Sequences (Ed. By P L de Boer and D G Smith). Spec. Publ. Int. Assoc. Sediment. 1994:429-438
[56] Olsen T, Steel R, Hgseth K, et al. Sequencial architecture in a fluvial succession: Sequence Stratigraphy in the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group, Prince Canyon, Utath. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1995,65(2):265-280
[57] Paola C; Heller P L; Angevine C L. The large-scale dynamics of grain-size variation in alluvial basins. Basin Research, 1992, 4(2)73-90
[58] Pratson L F, Haxby W F. What is the slope of the U.S. continental slope?. Geological Society of America (GSA). 1996. 24(1):3-6
[59] Schumm S A; Ethridge F G The effect of baselevel change on the fluvial system. ANNU GSA MTG, 1991, 23(12911)
[60] Schumm S A. River response to baselevel change: implications for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of Geology 1993 101(2): 279-294
[61] Senechal P, Perroud H et al., Interpretation of reflection attributes in a 3-d GRP (ground-penetrating radar) survey at Vallee D’ossau, Western Pyrenees, France. Geophysics 2000, 65(5): 1435-1445
[62] Shanley K W, McCabe P J. Perspective on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4):544-568
[63] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M et al., Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, Cores, and Outcrops. AAPG Methods in Exploration, Sereis. 1990, 7:1-55
[2] 常秋生.影响准噶尔盆地碎屑岩储层储集性的主要因素. 新疆石油学院学报, 2003,15(3):18-21
[3] 德勒达尔,任军民.准噶尔盆地卡因迪克侏罗系齐古组储层沉积特征.新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(1):1-4
[4] 邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质,1995, 16(2): 90～97
[5] 丁卫星,马英俊,刘红正.准噶尔盆地Z1 井区沉积微相研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(2):8-9
[6] 高新生,赵霞飞,李天明,唐忠华.准噶尔盆地西部侏罗系层序地层特征.石油天然气与地质,2001,22(2):165-168
[7] 谷云飞,马明福,苏世龙,徐怀民,胡斌,姚卫江.准噶尔盆地白垩系岩相古地理.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):337-3343
[8] 管守锐,李儒峰,王英民,刘凌,赵秀岐,齐雪峰.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层学研究鲍志东,石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):48-51
[9] 胡宗全、朱筱敏、彭勇民.准噶尔盆地西北缘车排子地区侏罗系物源及古水流分析.古地理学报,2002,8(1):23-28
[10]胡宗全,李明娟.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系层序模拟与沉积相演化特征.石油天然气与地质,2003,24(4):351-356
[11]胡宗全,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系储集物性的主要控制因素 .成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):152-156
[12]胡宗全,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗系储层成岩作用及孔隙演化. 石油大学学报 (自然科学版 ),2002,26(3):16-20
[13]况军,姚根顺,朱国华,寿建峰,王鑫.准噶尔盆地腹部地区侏罗系三工河组相对优质储集层的成因石油勘探与开发,2001,28(6):34-40
[14]况军,唐勇,朱国华,崔炳富.准噶尔盆地侏罗系储集层的基本特征及其主控因素分析.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):52-56
[15]李振宏 ,汤良杰 ,丁文龙 ,姚素平.准噶尔盆地腹部地区断裂特征分析.石油勘探与开发, 2002,29(1):40-43
[16]李振宏.准噶尔盆地腹部地区断裂特征浅析.新疆石油学院学报,2001,13(3):2000-2003
[17]李学义,邵雨,李天明.准噶尔盆地南缘三个油气成藏组合研究.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(6):32-34
[18]刘豪,王英民,王媛.浅析准噶尔盆地侏罗系煤层在层序地层中的意义.沉积学报,2002,20(2):197-202
[19]刘洛夫,康永尚,齐雪峰,唐勇,熊正祥.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层格架中的烃源岩评价.沉积学报,2002,20(4):687-694
[20] 柳永清,李寅.准噶尔盆地侏罗系露头层序地层及沉积学特征。地球学报,2001,22(1):49~54
[21]罗凯声.2003. 不整合研究在准噶尔盆地勘探中的作用.新疆石油地质,24(6):543-545
[22] 蒲仁海,梅志超,唐忠华.准噶尔盆地东部侏罗系陆相层序地层初探[J].新疆石油地质,1994,15(4):335-341
[23]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,齐雪峰,王媛.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学—中国地质大学学报 ,2002,27(6):683-688
[24]王宜林,康永尚. 2003. 准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序格架中油气藏的分布规律及其主控因素. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),27(5):1-7
[25]王红亮,邓宏文,孙德君.准噶尔盆地南缘层序地层特征与有利含气区带预测.石油实验地质,2000,22(4):336-340
[26]王文军,何禹斌.准噶尔盆地Z1 井油源对比研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(增刊):24-26
[27]王卓飞,蒋宜勤,祝嗣全.准噶尔盆地侏罗系低渗透油气储层特征及成因探讨.断块油气田,2003,10(5):23-27
[28]魏魁生,徐怀大,叶淑芬 ,等 .松辽盆地白垩系高分辨率层序地层格架.石油与天然气地质 , 1997, 18( 1) :7-14.
[29]吴金才,张建中,石好果,王离迟,孟闲龙,朱允辉.准噶尔盆地腹部复合圈闭成藏特征研究.石油实验地质,2003,25(6):735-740
[30]吴孔友 ,查明 ,洪梅.准噶尔盆地不整合结构的地球物理响应及油气成藏意义.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):328-333
[31]夏显佰,陈布科,王鑫,斯春松,寿建峰.准噶尔盆地马桥凸起区J1s 沉积物源分析.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(3):13-15
[32]杨永泰,王社教,培东宏,邢娅. 准噶尔盆地腹部深层成藏条件及勘探领域分析. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(4):32-34
[33]杨建业,任德贻,邵龙义. 沉积有机相在陆相层序地层格架中的分布特征———以吐哈盆地台北凹陷及准噶尔盆地南缘中侏罗世煤系为例. 沉积学报,2000,18(4):585-589
[34]张满郎,顾新元,张琴,詹家祯.准噶尔盆地彩参 2 井侏罗纪孢粉化石及层序地层分析.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(1):16-23
[35]张满郎,张琴,朱筱敏.准噶尔盆地侏罗系层序地层划分探讨.石油实验地质,2000,22(3):236-241
[36]张满郎,朱筱敏,张琴.准噶尔盆地东部侏罗系沉积体系及油气意义.石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):272-278 张琴,王贵文,朱筱敏,张满郎.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系测井沉积相.古地理学报,2003,3(3):41-47
[38]张琴,朱筱敏,张满郎.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系地震相研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(1):72-78
[39]张年富,齐雪峰,王英民,刘豪,王媛.准噶尔盆地侏罗系Ⅲ层序底界上下砂体预测与有利区评价.石油天然气与地质,2002,23(2):145-149
[40]张义杰,柳广弟.准噶尔盆地复合油气系统特征、演化与油气勘探方向.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(1):36-39
[41]赵玉光,丘东洲.西准噶尔界山前陆盆地晚期 (T -J)层序地层与油气勘探.新疆石油地质 , 1993, 14( 4) :323- 331.钟大康,朱筱敏,文应初.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡侏罗系砂岩成岩作用、孔隙演化及次生孔隙预测.中国海上油气(地质),2003,17(4):249-251
[43]朱筱敏,康安,张琴,张满郎,况军,吴晓智,韩军.2002.准噶尔盆地东北缘侏罗系含煤岩系层序地层和隐蔽圈闭.石油与天然气地质, 23(2):121-126
[44] Wilgus, C.K., Posamentier, H.W., Hasting,B.S., 等著.徐怀大、魏魁生、洪卫东等译.层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)[C].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.1～515)
[45] Blum M D, et al. Fluvial response to climate and sea-level change: a review and look forword. Sedimentology, 2000, 47(Suppl. 1): 2-48
[46] Bull W B. Geomorphic responses to climatic change: New York, Oxford University Press: 1991, 326P
[47] Cross T A, Lessenge M A et al., Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high resolution stratigraphic correlation. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications. NPE Special Publication, 1998,8:171～195
[48] Fielding C R. Varieties of fluvial form: the relevance to geologists of an expanded reality. In: Varieties of Fluvial Form (Ed: by A J Miller and A Gupta), 1999, John Wiley. Chichester. P497-505
[49] Galloway W E; Hobday D K. Terrigenous clastic depositional systems: applications to fossil fuel and groundwater resources SPRINGER-VERLAG, 1996 (ISBN 3-540-60232-1; 2ND EDITION; 50
[50] Galloway W E. Silicicalstic slope and base-of-slope depositional systems: component facies, stratigraphic architecture, and calssification. AAPG Bulletin, 1998, 82(4):569-595
[51] Koss J E, Ethridge F G, Schumm S A. An experimental study of the effects of base level change on fluvial, coastal plain and shelf system. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1994,,64(2):90-98
[52] Lemons D R; Chan M A. Facies architecture and sequence stratigraphy of fine-grained lacustrine deltas along The eastern margin of Late Pleistocene Lake Bonneville, Northern Utah and Southern Idaho. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83( 4) 635-665
[53] Martisen O J, Ryseth A et al., Stratigraphic base level and fluvial architecture: ericson sandstone. SEDIMENTOLOGY. 1999, 46(2):235-259
[54] Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphy correlation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1991, 61:497-505
[55] Olsen H. Orbital forcing on continental depositional systems-lacustrine and fluvial cyclicity in the Devonian of East Greenland. In: Orbital Forcing and Cyclic Sequences (Ed. By P L de Boer and D G Smith). Spec. Publ. Int. Assoc. Sediment. 1994:429-438
[56] Olsen T, Steel R, Hgseth K, et al. Sequencial architecture in a fluvial succession: Sequence Stratigraphy in the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group, Prince Canyon, Utath. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1995,65(2):265-280
[57] Paola C; Heller P L; Angevine C L. The large-scale dynamics of grain-size variation in alluvial basins. Basin Research, 1992, 4(2)73-90
[58] Pratson L F, Haxby W F. What is the slope of the U.S. continental slope?. Geological Society of America (GSA). 1996. 24(1):3-6
[59] Schumm S A; Ethridge F G The effect of baselevel change on the fluvial system. ANNU GSA MTG, 1991, 23(12911)
[60] Schumm S A. River response to baselevel change: implications for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of Geology 1993 101(2): 279-294
[61] Senechal P, Perroud H et al., Interpretation of reflection attributes in a 3-d GRP (ground-penetrating radar) survey at Vallee D’ossau, Western Pyrenees, France. Geophysics 2000, 65(5): 1435-1445
[62] Shanley K W, McCabe P J. Perspective on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4):544-568
[63] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M et al., Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, Cores, and Outcrops. AAPG Methods in Exploration, Sereis. 1990, 7:1-55
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |