辽宁本溪地区晚石炭世早期地层和（？）类动物群研究
|
摘要
本文重点研究了辽宁本溪地区晚石炭世早期本溪组的层型剖面——牛毛岭剖面。按其岩性,将研究区该时期分为上下两个岩性段,下部为紫色含铁铝泥岩段,上部为碎屑岩夹灰岩段。其中所夹5层较厚的灰岩均含丰富的古动物化石,如(蜓)类、腕足类、珊瑚类、牙形刺、双壳类等。在众多的动物化石中,除牙形刺外,(蜓)类是最具时代意义的。此外,实测剖面时在上蚂蚁灰岩之上和小峪灰岩之上新发现2层灰岩,另有三层发现了夹泥灰岩透镜体。其中上蚂蚁之上的灰岩含类化石及大量生物碎屑(剖面第33层)。到目前为止含灰岩共计6层,相对前人的研究又增加了1层。
类研究方面,系统的采集了化石,共鉴定出(蜓)类13属71种(含比较种)。并对其中的代表属种11属33种进行了描述,虽未发现新种,但是发现了一些在研究区第一次出现的老属种,延长了某些老属种分布时间。这些发现,虽不是新属新种,但扩大了研究区(蜓)类动物群组成分子。如以往认为Millerella,Pseudostaffella仅分布在本溪组个别层位,现在该属存在于本溪组所有含灰岩层中。
另外,还就含地层时代、生物地层划分等问题进行了讨论。
Stratigraphic section of niumao ridge in benxi in Liaoning province was named by Benxi stratotype in early time of Late Carboniferous in southern Region of north– northeast China, which established by Zhao Yazeng in 1926. the study area is located in Benxi area, eastern of Liaoning Province. Stratigraphic area belongs to north zoning of northeast China of the North China platform area. And this area is of the features of continuously exposing and good outcrops and clear top and bottom boundaries. The effects of later tectonic movement in this area was slight. Animal and plant fossils were rich here, even the evolutionary sequence about fusulinds fossils was more complete and clear. It is the standard area for stratigraphic division and correlation about the early time of Late Carboniferous in northeast of China.
The essay took the Section of Niumao ridge as the study object. And we had identified 71 species in 13 genera (include comparative species) and described the representative species of 33 species in 11 genera through the ways of re-measurement for the profile and collecting systemically for fossils and observation for lines about the corresponding layers of surrounding neighbors. And the essay also had discussed the age of fusulinds-in’s layer and divided the layer of organism.
The layer of early time of Late Carboniferous in study area was named Benxi group. It’s in touch with Majiagou group in middle Ordovician for parallel unconformity and integrated cove-raged by Taiyuan group on it. The thickness of Benxi group in study area is 158.4m and it can be further divided into 2 lithologics according it’s lithology. The lower is purple mudstone with Fe-Al and the upper is clastic with limestone. In it 5 thicker limestone layers are rich of fossils like fusulinds , brachiopods, corals, conodonts, bivalves, etc. in various of fossils, the fusulinds is the most significant for the Times except the conodonts. On the other side, 2 layers of limestone were found above the ants limestone layer and Xiaoyu limestone layer when profiles was measured. And folder marl lenses were found in other 3 layers. The limestone above the top of ants is rich of fusulinds fossils and a lot of biological debris (Section 33 layers). Till now there were 6 layers which 1 layer more than the study before. with fusulinds fossils in it.
At the research of fusulinds aspect, two stages had been divided according to the characteristics of occurrence, development and prosperity in Taizi river valley. The first stage is the time of erliest fusulinds biological composition in Benxi period in Benxi area with the equivalent of Eostaffella Subsolana belt who had not been found in the profile of Niumao ridge. The second stage of the fusulinds species composition is equivalent to Fusulina-Fusulinella belt. This two kinds of fusulinds fossils were the most common on the top of Benxi group in Niumao ridge. And they represented the peak stage of fusulinds fauna in the early time of Late Carboniferous. And after study 5 subzones were further divided as follows: Fusulina–Fusulinella zone:⑤Fusulina cylindrica-F.quasicylindrica subzones;④Fusulinella provecta subzones;③Pseudostaffella sphaeroidea subzones;②Fusulina konnoi subzones;①Fusulina schellwieni subzones
The division plan could be juxtaposed on corresponding layers with the most areas domestic and foreign. Millerella,Pseudostaffella were only two distributed in individual layer on the top of Benxi group had been changed. And the true is that they are in all of the fusulinds layers on the top of Benxi group, at least this is the case in Niumao ridge.
类研究方面,系统的采集了化石,共鉴定出(蜓)类13属71种(含比较种)。并对其中的代表属种11属33种进行了描述,虽未发现新种,但是发现了一些在研究区第一次出现的老属种,延长了某些老属种分布时间。这些发现,虽不是新属新种,但扩大了研究区(蜓)类动物群组成分子。如以往认为Millerella,Pseudostaffella仅分布在本溪组个别层位,现在该属存在于本溪组所有含灰岩层中。
另外,还就含地层时代、生物地层划分等问题进行了讨论。
Stratigraphic section of niumao ridge in benxi in Liaoning province was named by Benxi stratotype in early time of Late Carboniferous in southern Region of north– northeast China, which established by Zhao Yazeng in 1926. the study area is located in Benxi area, eastern of Liaoning Province. Stratigraphic area belongs to north zoning of northeast China of the North China platform area. And this area is of the features of continuously exposing and good outcrops and clear top and bottom boundaries. The effects of later tectonic movement in this area was slight. Animal and plant fossils were rich here, even the evolutionary sequence about fusulinds fossils was more complete and clear. It is the standard area for stratigraphic division and correlation about the early time of Late Carboniferous in northeast of China.
The essay took the Section of Niumao ridge as the study object. And we had identified 71 species in 13 genera (include comparative species) and described the representative species of 33 species in 11 genera through the ways of re-measurement for the profile and collecting systemically for fossils and observation for lines about the corresponding layers of surrounding neighbors. And the essay also had discussed the age of fusulinds-in’s layer and divided the layer of organism.
The layer of early time of Late Carboniferous in study area was named Benxi group. It’s in touch with Majiagou group in middle Ordovician for parallel unconformity and integrated cove-raged by Taiyuan group on it. The thickness of Benxi group in study area is 158.4m and it can be further divided into 2 lithologics according it’s lithology. The lower is purple mudstone with Fe-Al and the upper is clastic with limestone. In it 5 thicker limestone layers are rich of fossils like fusulinds , brachiopods, corals, conodonts, bivalves, etc. in various of fossils, the fusulinds is the most significant for the Times except the conodonts. On the other side, 2 layers of limestone were found above the ants limestone layer and Xiaoyu limestone layer when profiles was measured. And folder marl lenses were found in other 3 layers. The limestone above the top of ants is rich of fusulinds fossils and a lot of biological debris (Section 33 layers). Till now there were 6 layers which 1 layer more than the study before. with fusulinds fossils in it.
At the research of fusulinds aspect, two stages had been divided according to the characteristics of occurrence, development and prosperity in Taizi river valley. The first stage is the time of erliest fusulinds biological composition in Benxi period in Benxi area with the equivalent of Eostaffella Subsolana belt who had not been found in the profile of Niumao ridge. The second stage of the fusulinds species composition is equivalent to Fusulina-Fusulinella belt. This two kinds of fusulinds fossils were the most common on the top of Benxi group in Niumao ridge. And they represented the peak stage of fusulinds fauna in the early time of Late Carboniferous. And after study 5 subzones were further divided as follows: Fusulina–Fusulinella zone:⑤Fusulina cylindrica-F.quasicylindrica subzones;④Fusulinella provecta subzones;③Pseudostaffella sphaeroidea subzones;②Fusulina konnoi subzones;①Fusulina schellwieni subzones
The division plan could be juxtaposed on corresponding layers with the most areas domestic and foreign. Millerella,Pseudostaffella were only two distributed in individual layer on the top of Benxi group had been changed. And the true is that they are in all of the fusulinds layers on the top of Benxi group, at least this is the case in Niumao ridge.
引文
[1]安徽省地质局区域地质调查队,安徽省古生物图册-安徽(蜓)类化石[M].安徽科学技术出版社,1982。
[2]陈为公,范国清.辽东半岛南部的石炭-二叠系界线.辽宁地质[J].2000,17(3):213-218.
[3]陈旭.中国南部之科[M].中国古生物志乙种第4号第2册.1934.
[4]陈旭.中国石炭(蜓)类化石带[C].国际石炭纪地层会议论文.1964.
[5]陈旭,王建华.广西宜山地区晚石炭世马平组的(蜓)类[M].中国古生物志新乙种第19号.科学出版社,1983.
[6]陈丕基.辽宁西部晚古生代陆相地层的研究[J].南京地质古生物研究所所刊(1),1980.
[7]程立人,陈寿铭,张以春,吴水忠.西藏羌北地区石炭纪竹(蜓)类动物群及其分带[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版).2007,37(1):1-7.
[8]程立人,吴水忠.山东营县北部本溪组化石及古地理浅析[R].中国古生物学会第21届学术年会,2001.
[9]程立人,张予杰,张玉春,吴水忠.幕府山在西藏申扎地区中二叠统的发现[J].古生物学报,2005,44(1):74-78.
[10]地质部南京地质矿产研究所.华北地区古生物图册(二)-晚古生代分册[M].地质出版社,1982.
[11]丁杰,王洪战,范国清等.太子河流域本溪期沉积相特征[J].辽宁地质,1988,(2):136-146.
[12]丁蕴杰、夏国英、许寿永等.中国石炭—二叠系界线[M].地质出版社,1992.
[13]范炳恒,何锡麟.华北地台晚古生代腕足动物群及其地层研究[M].中国矿业大学出版社, 1999.
[14]范国清.辽宁石炭纪海侵[J].辽宁地质,1987,(2):132-145.
[15]范国清.关于小东沟组[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):262-268.
[16]范国清.“本溪系”(组)创名考[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):287-288.
[17]范国清.华北板块东部石炭纪带缺失规律及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1990,(1):50-55.
[18]范国清.中朝板块东部石炭纪沉积特征及其构造、古地理[J].岩相古地理,1990,(3):1-8.
[19]范国清.华北石炭纪海侵活动规律[J].中国区域地质,1991,(4):349-355.
[20]范国清.关于华北早、中石炭世的海侵方向[N].科学通报,1991,(6):454-455.。
[21]范国清.华北陆表海何时最终退出辽东[J].辽宁地质,1991,(3):259-261.
[22]范国清.论本溪群[J].辽宁地质,1993,(2):159-175.
[23]范国清.太子河流域辽阳-本溪间的(蜓)类动物群[J].辽宁地质,1997,(4):241-266.
[24]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.辽南复州湾本溪组的[N].辽宁地质学报,1988,(2).
[25]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.太子河流域山西组海相动物化石新材料及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1988,(3):245-252.
[26]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.关于本溪组(群)的时代问题[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):285-286.
[27]韩建修.内蒙乌兰察布盟阿木山地区晚石炭世晚期的(蜓)类[C].地层古生物论文集.地质出版社,1975,(2):132-203.
[28](美)H.D.赤德伯格,张守信译,杨遵仪校.地层划分、术语和程序[M].科学出版社, 1979.
[29]吉林省区域地层表编组.东北地区区域地层表(吉林省分册)[M].地质出版社,1978.
[30]金建华,米家榕.辽宁本溪田师傅早中石炭世沉积环境分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1999,38(5):98-103.
[31]金玉玕,张开宁.生态地层学(Ecostratigraphy)述评[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(3):235-239.
[32]郎嘉彬.辽宁本溪石炭系本溪组命名剖面的牙型刺化石[D].吉林大学古生物中心,2007
[33]郎嘉彬,王成源.本溪组命名剖面牙形刺动物群的特征及地质时代[J].世界地质,2007,26(2):137-144.
[34]李四光.中国北部之科.中国古生物志乙种第4号第1册[M],1927.
[35]李星学.中国晚古生代陆相地层[C].全国地层会议学术报告汇编.科学出版社,1963.
[36]辽宁省区域地层表编写组.东北地区地层表(辽宁省分册)[M].地质出版社,1978.
[37]刘发.河北秦皇岛石门寨地区晚石炭世本溪组下部的腕足动物及其古环境[J].古生物学报,1992,31(2):249-255.
[38]刘发.辽宁本溪地区本溪组下部腕足(蜓)类化石的发现及其意义[J].长春地质学院学报,1987,17(2):121-154.
[39]刘晓峰,范国清.辽东本溪群鱼化石的发现及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1993,(1):16-22.
[40]刘晓峰,范国清.东北南部的石炭系[J].辽宁地质,1993,(4):289-304.
[41]米家榕,金建华,高联达.辽东太子河流域早石碳世植物古生态与古环境[M].地质出版社.
[42]米家榕,孙克勤,金建华.辽宁本溪早石炭世植物化石[J].长春地质学院学报,1990,20(4):361-368.
[43]内蒙古自治区地质局.东北地质科学研究所.华北地区古生物图册-内蒙古分册(一)[M].地质出版社,1976.
[44]牛保祥,王虹,周建平等.山东淄博地区石炭纪含地层[J].地质学杂志,1985,9(2):108-117.
[43]潘广,李振声等.太子河流域古生界分层问题[J].地质评论,1959,19(6).
[45]芮琳.贵州罗甸罗苏一带石炭系中间界线附近的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1987,26(4):367-391.
[46]尚冠雄,汪曾荫.从区域范围讨论华北石炭二叠纪地层划分问题[J].中国区域地质,1984,(10):85-91.
[47]尚冠雄,汪曾荫.华北地台东部之中石炭统[J].地质学杂志,1988,12(4):255-261.
[48]盛金章.科之一新属-太子河(中、英文)[J].中国地质学会志,1951,(31):79-84.
[49]盛金章. [[J].中国地质,1956,(8):19-22.
[50]盛金章. [J].中国地质,1956,(9):22-26.
[51]盛金章.太子河流域本溪统的科[M].中国古生物志新乙种第7号,1958.
[52]盛金章,陶南生. [M].科学出版社,1959.
[53]盛金章.中国的(蜓)类[M].科学出版社,1962.
[54]盛金章.中国石炭(蜓)类化石带[C].国际石炭纪地层会议论文,1963.
[55]盛金章,闵庆魁,王莉莉.江苏南京金丝岗黄龙灰岩剖面及(蜓)类分带[J].古生物学报,15(2).
[56]沈阳地质矿产研究所.东北地区古生物图册(一)古生代分册[M].地质出版社,1980.
[57]孙巧缡,张遴信.新疆阿尔格山早二叠世的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1985,24(5).
[58]藤本治义.本溪湖の本溪统の有孔虫化石[N].伪拓殖大学研究所报,1940,(1).
[59]吴水忠.化石.古生物专题[M].长春地质学院地古教研室,1984.
[60]吴望始.初析石炭系和二叠系的界限位置[J].古生物学报,1991,30(1):1-5.
[61]王洪站,范国清等.辽东太子河流域石炭-二叠纪岩相古地理及铝土矿成矿地质条件[J].辽宁地质,1991,(1):1-41.
[62]王振,王仁农.华北地台东南部二叠纪的几种轮藻[J].微体古生物报,1986,3(3):273-279.
[63]王仁农.华北陆台东南部上石盒子组海绵岩的发现[J].煤炭学报,1983,(3):55-64.
[64]王仁农.Chiropteris kawasakii Kon’no在华北上石盒子组的发现[J].古生物学报,1986,25(2)_223-225.
[65]王仁农,王长海.华北陆台南部石炭系研究的新进展兼论其铁铝岩层穿时性[J].煤炭学报,(1):1-9.
[66]王向东,金玉玕.石炭纪年代地层学研究概况[J].地质学杂志,2000,24(2):90-98.
[67]王向东,金玉玕.石炭系全球界线层型研究进展①[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(2):147-153.
[68]王钰,卢衍豪,杨敬之,穆恩之,盛金章.辽宁太子河流域地层(1)[J].地质学报,1954,34(1):17-64.
[69]王钰,卢衍豪,杨敬之等.辽宁太子河流域地层(2)[J].地质学报,1954,34(2):89-216.
[70]王玉净.中国研究三十年[C].中国微体古生物学会会讯,1979,(1).
[71]王玉净,周建平.申扎早二叠世(蜓)类[J].中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1986,(10).
[72]汪增荫,尚冠雄,张洪江等.辽东复洲湾中石炭世地层兼论华北地台中石炭统的划分[J].现代地质,1989,3(2):165-174.
[73]汪增荫,尚冠雄.河南禹县大风口石炭、二叠纪含地层初步研究[J].地层学杂志,1989年12月,13(4):290-295.
[74]汪增荫,王云慧,张遴信.辽宁复州湾的PROFUSULINELLA动物群[J].微体古生物学报,1992,9(4):415-421.
[75]西北地质矿产研究所.西北地区古生物图册-陕甘宁分册(二)[M].地质出版社,1983.
[76]夏国英,丁蕴杰,丁惠等.中国石炭——二叠系界线层型研究[M].地质出版社,1996.
[77]夏国英,丁蕴杰.中国上石炭统上部及下二叠统海相地层中阶的划分[J].中国地质,2002,29(1):20-29.
[789]杨敬之.关于中国石炭系的划分和对比.中国各纪地层对比表及说明书[M].科学出版社,1982.
[79]杨敬之.试论中国石炭系内部分界[C].全国石炭纪会议论文专集.地质出版社,1987.
[80]杨敬之,吴望始,廖卓庭等.我国石炭系分统的再认识[J].地层学杂志, 1979,3(3):188—192.
[81]杨敬之、徐珊红.石炭系上、下统分界研究概况与展望[J].地层学杂志,1986,10(4):304-310.
[82]杨式溥.国际石炭划分的进展和我国上下石炭统的界线[C].全国石炭纪会议论文专集.地质出版社,1987.
[83].杨式溥,侯鸿飞等.中国的石炭系[J].地质学报,1980,54(3).
[84]杨欣德,李星云,孙敬书等.辽宁省岩石地层[M].中国地质大学出版社, 1997.
[85]阴家润,蔡华伟,周志广等.西藏海相三叠系-侏罗系界限及晚三叠世生物绝灭事件研究[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2006,13(4).
[86]尹赞勋,陈锦石,张守信等.中国地层典(七)石炭系[M].科学出版社,1966.
[87]张遴信.安徽和县下石炭统和州段中的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1962,10(4).
[88]张遴信,周建平.论中国的石炭系与二叠系界线[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(3):224-229.
[89]张文堂.中国的奥陶系[M].全国地层会议学术报告汇编.科学出版社,1962.
[90]张志存.太原西山上石炭统太原组的(蜓)类分带[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(4):272—290.
[91]张志存,范国清.华北中石炭世地方性阶的建立[J].辽宁地质,1990,第(4):314-320.
[92]王增吉等.中国地层8-中国的石炭系中国的石炭系[M].地质出版社,1990.
[93]周建平.桂西北早、中二叠世常么期和栖霞期含地层及其分带[J].地质学杂志,1998年,22(4).
[94]周建平,张遴信,茅永强.原小纺锤旋壁超微构造的研究[J].微体古生物学报,2000年,17(1):64-67.
[95]周世态.鞍山-本溪地区条带状铁矿地质[M].地质出版社,1994.
[96]周祖仁,王玉净,盛金章等.二叠纪新小纺锤模式种Nefusulinella lantenoisi Deprat,1913在云南保山的发现[J].古生物学报,2000,39(4):457-465.
[97]Bostwick,David A. Stratigraphy of the Wood River Formation[J].Southcentral Idaho Journ.Pal. 1955,29(6):941-951.pls.96-98,1 text-fig.
[98]Fujimoto,H.and Igo,H. Hidaella.A New Genus of the Pennsylvanian Fusulinids from the Fukuji District,Eastern Part of the Hida Mountainland[J].Centeal Japan.Trans.Proc. Oalacont.Soc.Hapan,N.S. 1955,18:45-48.
[99]Ishij,Kwn-ichi(石井健一).Itadorigawa Group in Western Shikoju-on some problem concerning the middle Pennsylvanian of Japan[J].Japan Jour.Geol.Soc. 1955,62(724):.20-29.(inJapanese with English summary) .
[100]Kanmera,K.Fusulinids from the Yayamadake Limestone of the Hikawa Valley,Kumamoto Prefecture,Kyushu,Japan.Part 1,Fusulinids of the Upper Middle Carboniferous[J].Hapanese Jour.Geol.Geogr.1954,25(1-2):117-155,pls.12-14.
[101]Thompson,M.L. New Genera of Fusulind Foraminifera[J].Contr.Cushman Found. Foram. Res.1951,2(4):116-119,pls.13,14.
[102]Rui Lin and Zhang Linxin.Carboniferous-Permian Boundary in the World.Abstracis of Papers(Ⅰ) [M].11th International congress of Carboniferous stratigraphy and Geology.Science pressBeijing.1987.
[103]Heckel P H.Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy[J].Chairman’s column.2004.,22:1-3.
[104]Zhang Runping and Tang Kedong.Pre-Jurassic tectonic evolution of inter-continental region and the suture zone Between the North China and Siberian platforms[J].Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1989,1(3).
[105]Gyory Barossy.Scaning electron microscopic and X-ray Powder diffraction study of maganiferous bauxiteKincseseanya[J].Hungary clay and clay mineral.1985,33(6):532-538.
[106]Rotai,A.P. .Carboniferous stratigraphy of USSR:Proposel foe an International Classification in the Carboniferous of USSR[M].1979.
[107]Barskov I.S.,Alekseev A.S.Carboniferous conodonts of the Moscow area,In:Makhina, M.Kh.,And paleogeography of the Carboniferous of the Moscow Syncline[J].Trudy,Ministry of Geology.Moscow,RSGSP.1979,98-116.(in Russian).
[2]陈为公,范国清.辽东半岛南部的石炭-二叠系界线.辽宁地质[J].2000,17(3):213-218.
[3]陈旭.中国南部之科[M].中国古生物志乙种第4号第2册.1934.
[4]陈旭.中国石炭(蜓)类化石带[C].国际石炭纪地层会议论文.1964.
[5]陈旭,王建华.广西宜山地区晚石炭世马平组的(蜓)类[M].中国古生物志新乙种第19号.科学出版社,1983.
[6]陈丕基.辽宁西部晚古生代陆相地层的研究[J].南京地质古生物研究所所刊(1),1980.
[7]程立人,陈寿铭,张以春,吴水忠.西藏羌北地区石炭纪竹(蜓)类动物群及其分带[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版).2007,37(1):1-7.
[8]程立人,吴水忠.山东营县北部本溪组化石及古地理浅析[R].中国古生物学会第21届学术年会,2001.
[9]程立人,张予杰,张玉春,吴水忠.幕府山在西藏申扎地区中二叠统的发现[J].古生物学报,2005,44(1):74-78.
[10]地质部南京地质矿产研究所.华北地区古生物图册(二)-晚古生代分册[M].地质出版社,1982.
[11]丁杰,王洪战,范国清等.太子河流域本溪期沉积相特征[J].辽宁地质,1988,(2):136-146.
[12]丁蕴杰、夏国英、许寿永等.中国石炭—二叠系界线[M].地质出版社,1992.
[13]范炳恒,何锡麟.华北地台晚古生代腕足动物群及其地层研究[M].中国矿业大学出版社, 1999.
[14]范国清.辽宁石炭纪海侵[J].辽宁地质,1987,(2):132-145.
[15]范国清.关于小东沟组[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):262-268.
[16]范国清.“本溪系”(组)创名考[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):287-288.
[17]范国清.华北板块东部石炭纪带缺失规律及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1990,(1):50-55.
[18]范国清.中朝板块东部石炭纪沉积特征及其构造、古地理[J].岩相古地理,1990,(3):1-8.
[19]范国清.华北石炭纪海侵活动规律[J].中国区域地质,1991,(4):349-355.
[20]范国清.关于华北早、中石炭世的海侵方向[N].科学通报,1991,(6):454-455.。
[21]范国清.华北陆表海何时最终退出辽东[J].辽宁地质,1991,(3):259-261.
[22]范国清.论本溪群[J].辽宁地质,1993,(2):159-175.
[23]范国清.太子河流域辽阳-本溪间的(蜓)类动物群[J].辽宁地质,1997,(4):241-266.
[24]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.辽南复州湾本溪组的[N].辽宁地质学报,1988,(2).
[25]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.太子河流域山西组海相动物化石新材料及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1988,(3):245-252.
[26]范国清,王洪战,丁杰等.关于本溪组(群)的时代问题[J].辽宁地质,1989,(3):285-286.
[27]韩建修.内蒙乌兰察布盟阿木山地区晚石炭世晚期的(蜓)类[C].地层古生物论文集.地质出版社,1975,(2):132-203.
[28](美)H.D.赤德伯格,张守信译,杨遵仪校.地层划分、术语和程序[M].科学出版社, 1979.
[29]吉林省区域地层表编组.东北地区区域地层表(吉林省分册)[M].地质出版社,1978.
[30]金建华,米家榕.辽宁本溪田师傅早中石炭世沉积环境分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1999,38(5):98-103.
[31]金玉玕,张开宁.生态地层学(Ecostratigraphy)述评[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(3):235-239.
[32]郎嘉彬.辽宁本溪石炭系本溪组命名剖面的牙型刺化石[D].吉林大学古生物中心,2007
[33]郎嘉彬,王成源.本溪组命名剖面牙形刺动物群的特征及地质时代[J].世界地质,2007,26(2):137-144.
[34]李四光.中国北部之科.中国古生物志乙种第4号第1册[M],1927.
[35]李星学.中国晚古生代陆相地层[C].全国地层会议学术报告汇编.科学出版社,1963.
[36]辽宁省区域地层表编写组.东北地区地层表(辽宁省分册)[M].地质出版社,1978.
[37]刘发.河北秦皇岛石门寨地区晚石炭世本溪组下部的腕足动物及其古环境[J].古生物学报,1992,31(2):249-255.
[38]刘发.辽宁本溪地区本溪组下部腕足(蜓)类化石的发现及其意义[J].长春地质学院学报,1987,17(2):121-154.
[39]刘晓峰,范国清.辽东本溪群鱼化石的发现及其意义[J].辽宁地质,1993,(1):16-22.
[40]刘晓峰,范国清.东北南部的石炭系[J].辽宁地质,1993,(4):289-304.
[41]米家榕,金建华,高联达.辽东太子河流域早石碳世植物古生态与古环境[M].地质出版社.
[42]米家榕,孙克勤,金建华.辽宁本溪早石炭世植物化石[J].长春地质学院学报,1990,20(4):361-368.
[43]内蒙古自治区地质局.东北地质科学研究所.华北地区古生物图册-内蒙古分册(一)[M].地质出版社,1976.
[44]牛保祥,王虹,周建平等.山东淄博地区石炭纪含地层[J].地质学杂志,1985,9(2):108-117.
[43]潘广,李振声等.太子河流域古生界分层问题[J].地质评论,1959,19(6).
[45]芮琳.贵州罗甸罗苏一带石炭系中间界线附近的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1987,26(4):367-391.
[46]尚冠雄,汪曾荫.从区域范围讨论华北石炭二叠纪地层划分问题[J].中国区域地质,1984,(10):85-91.
[47]尚冠雄,汪曾荫.华北地台东部之中石炭统[J].地质学杂志,1988,12(4):255-261.
[48]盛金章.科之一新属-太子河(中、英文)[J].中国地质学会志,1951,(31):79-84.
[49]盛金章. [[J].中国地质,1956,(8):19-22.
[50]盛金章. [J].中国地质,1956,(9):22-26.
[51]盛金章.太子河流域本溪统的科[M].中国古生物志新乙种第7号,1958.
[52]盛金章,陶南生. [M].科学出版社,1959.
[53]盛金章.中国的(蜓)类[M].科学出版社,1962.
[54]盛金章.中国石炭(蜓)类化石带[C].国际石炭纪地层会议论文,1963.
[55]盛金章,闵庆魁,王莉莉.江苏南京金丝岗黄龙灰岩剖面及(蜓)类分带[J].古生物学报,15(2).
[56]沈阳地质矿产研究所.东北地区古生物图册(一)古生代分册[M].地质出版社,1980.
[57]孙巧缡,张遴信.新疆阿尔格山早二叠世的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1985,24(5).
[58]藤本治义.本溪湖の本溪统の有孔虫化石[N].伪拓殖大学研究所报,1940,(1).
[59]吴水忠.化石.古生物专题[M].长春地质学院地古教研室,1984.
[60]吴望始.初析石炭系和二叠系的界限位置[J].古生物学报,1991,30(1):1-5.
[61]王洪站,范国清等.辽东太子河流域石炭-二叠纪岩相古地理及铝土矿成矿地质条件[J].辽宁地质,1991,(1):1-41.
[62]王振,王仁农.华北地台东南部二叠纪的几种轮藻[J].微体古生物报,1986,3(3):273-279.
[63]王仁农.华北陆台东南部上石盒子组海绵岩的发现[J].煤炭学报,1983,(3):55-64.
[64]王仁农.Chiropteris kawasakii Kon’no在华北上石盒子组的发现[J].古生物学报,1986,25(2)_223-225.
[65]王仁农,王长海.华北陆台南部石炭系研究的新进展兼论其铁铝岩层穿时性[J].煤炭学报,(1):1-9.
[66]王向东,金玉玕.石炭纪年代地层学研究概况[J].地质学杂志,2000,24(2):90-98.
[67]王向东,金玉玕.石炭系全球界线层型研究进展①[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(2):147-153.
[68]王钰,卢衍豪,杨敬之,穆恩之,盛金章.辽宁太子河流域地层(1)[J].地质学报,1954,34(1):17-64.
[69]王钰,卢衍豪,杨敬之等.辽宁太子河流域地层(2)[J].地质学报,1954,34(2):89-216.
[70]王玉净.中国研究三十年[C].中国微体古生物学会会讯,1979,(1).
[71]王玉净,周建平.申扎早二叠世(蜓)类[J].中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1986,(10).
[72]汪增荫,尚冠雄,张洪江等.辽东复洲湾中石炭世地层兼论华北地台中石炭统的划分[J].现代地质,1989,3(2):165-174.
[73]汪增荫,尚冠雄.河南禹县大风口石炭、二叠纪含地层初步研究[J].地层学杂志,1989年12月,13(4):290-295.
[74]汪增荫,王云慧,张遴信.辽宁复州湾的PROFUSULINELLA动物群[J].微体古生物学报,1992,9(4):415-421.
[75]西北地质矿产研究所.西北地区古生物图册-陕甘宁分册(二)[M].地质出版社,1983.
[76]夏国英,丁蕴杰,丁惠等.中国石炭——二叠系界线层型研究[M].地质出版社,1996.
[77]夏国英,丁蕴杰.中国上石炭统上部及下二叠统海相地层中阶的划分[J].中国地质,2002,29(1):20-29.
[789]杨敬之.关于中国石炭系的划分和对比.中国各纪地层对比表及说明书[M].科学出版社,1982.
[79]杨敬之.试论中国石炭系内部分界[C].全国石炭纪会议论文专集.地质出版社,1987.
[80]杨敬之,吴望始,廖卓庭等.我国石炭系分统的再认识[J].地层学杂志, 1979,3(3):188—192.
[81]杨敬之、徐珊红.石炭系上、下统分界研究概况与展望[J].地层学杂志,1986,10(4):304-310.
[82]杨式溥.国际石炭划分的进展和我国上下石炭统的界线[C].全国石炭纪会议论文专集.地质出版社,1987.
[83].杨式溥,侯鸿飞等.中国的石炭系[J].地质学报,1980,54(3).
[84]杨欣德,李星云,孙敬书等.辽宁省岩石地层[M].中国地质大学出版社, 1997.
[85]阴家润,蔡华伟,周志广等.西藏海相三叠系-侏罗系界限及晚三叠世生物绝灭事件研究[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2006,13(4).
[86]尹赞勋,陈锦石,张守信等.中国地层典(七)石炭系[M].科学出版社,1966.
[87]张遴信.安徽和县下石炭统和州段中的(蜓)类[J].古生物学报,1962,10(4).
[88]张遴信,周建平.论中国的石炭系与二叠系界线[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(3):224-229.
[89]张文堂.中国的奥陶系[M].全国地层会议学术报告汇编.科学出版社,1962.
[90]张志存.太原西山上石炭统太原组的(蜓)类分带[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(4):272—290.
[91]张志存,范国清.华北中石炭世地方性阶的建立[J].辽宁地质,1990,第(4):314-320.
[92]王增吉等.中国地层8-中国的石炭系中国的石炭系[M].地质出版社,1990.
[93]周建平.桂西北早、中二叠世常么期和栖霞期含地层及其分带[J].地质学杂志,1998年,22(4).
[94]周建平,张遴信,茅永强.原小纺锤旋壁超微构造的研究[J].微体古生物学报,2000年,17(1):64-67.
[95]周世态.鞍山-本溪地区条带状铁矿地质[M].地质出版社,1994.
[96]周祖仁,王玉净,盛金章等.二叠纪新小纺锤模式种Nefusulinella lantenoisi Deprat,1913在云南保山的发现[J].古生物学报,2000,39(4):457-465.
[97]Bostwick,David A. Stratigraphy of the Wood River Formation[J].Southcentral Idaho Journ.Pal. 1955,29(6):941-951.pls.96-98,1 text-fig.
[98]Fujimoto,H.and Igo,H. Hidaella.A New Genus of the Pennsylvanian Fusulinids from the Fukuji District,Eastern Part of the Hida Mountainland[J].Centeal Japan.Trans.Proc. Oalacont.Soc.Hapan,N.S. 1955,18:45-48.
[99]Ishij,Kwn-ichi(石井健一).Itadorigawa Group in Western Shikoju-on some problem concerning the middle Pennsylvanian of Japan[J].Japan Jour.Geol.Soc. 1955,62(724):.20-29.(inJapanese with English summary) .
[100]Kanmera,K.Fusulinids from the Yayamadake Limestone of the Hikawa Valley,Kumamoto Prefecture,Kyushu,Japan.Part 1,Fusulinids of the Upper Middle Carboniferous[J].Hapanese Jour.Geol.Geogr.1954,25(1-2):117-155,pls.12-14.
[101]Thompson,M.L. New Genera of Fusulind Foraminifera[J].Contr.Cushman Found. Foram. Res.1951,2(4):116-119,pls.13,14.
[102]Rui Lin and Zhang Linxin.Carboniferous-Permian Boundary in the World.Abstracis of Papers(Ⅰ) [M].11th International congress of Carboniferous stratigraphy and Geology.Science pressBeijing.1987.
[103]Heckel P H.Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy[J].Chairman’s column.2004.,22:1-3.
[104]Zhang Runping and Tang Kedong.Pre-Jurassic tectonic evolution of inter-continental region and the suture zone Between the North China and Siberian platforms[J].Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1989,1(3).
[105]Gyory Barossy.Scaning electron microscopic and X-ray Powder diffraction study of maganiferous bauxiteKincseseanya[J].Hungary clay and clay mineral.1985,33(6):532-538.
[106]Rotai,A.P. .Carboniferous stratigraphy of USSR:Proposel foe an International Classification in the Carboniferous of USSR[M].1979.
[107]Barskov I.S.,Alekseev A.S.Carboniferous conodonts of the Moscow area,In:Makhina, M.Kh.,And paleogeography of the Carboniferous of the Moscow Syncline[J].Trudy,Ministry of Geology.Moscow,RSGSP.1979,98-116.(in Russian).
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |