我国刑事庭前审查程序研究
|
摘要
刑事庭前审查程序介于提起公诉和开庭审理之间,是连接起诉与庭审的链条,是刑事诉讼的一个必经程序。文章以我国刑事庭前审查程序为研究对象,以对其进行完善为目的,通过对国外不同国家的刑事庭前审查程序的比较借鉴,在分析我国现行刑事庭前审查程序的缺陷基础上,就如何完善我国的刑事庭前审查程序做了一些探索。
全文共分为四章:第一章,刑事庭前审查程序的概论。首先对刑事庭前审查程序的概念加以界定,然后阐述刑事庭前审查程序的原则、功能和目的,在程序参与、程序公开、程序公正、控辩平等、诉讼经济原则的指导下,发挥过滤不当公诉、证据开示、案件分流、防止庭审法官庭前预断的功能,实现庭审实质化、程序公正、保障人权和提高诉讼效率的目的;第二章对英美和法德四个有代表性国家的庭前审查程序的立法规定进行比较和借鉴,为完善我国刑事庭前审查程序提供有益的借鉴和合理根据;第三章对刑事诉讼法关于我国现行刑事庭前审查程序立法规定的介绍,并结合其所存在的缺陷进行原因分析。第四章提出了完善我国刑事庭前审查程序的具体构想。包括庭前审查程序的适用范围、审查主体、参与主体、程序的启动、审查内容、审查方式、结果处理、救济机制。并进一步提出了为保障庭前审查程序的正常运行而所需的相关配套措施——完善简易程序和建立证据开示制度。
The criminal pretrial review procedure is between prosecution and the trial, connecting the prosecution and the trial,which is a necessary criminal proceeding. The research object of the article is criminal pretrial review procedure, in order to improve its conduct for the purpose, through introducing the criminal pretrial procedure in foreign countries, analyzing the existing problems in our country’s criminal pretrial review procedure, do some exploring to how perfect the criminal pretrial review procedure.
This article contains four chapters: the first chapter researches general outline of the criminal pretrial review procedure. Firstly, define the concept of criminal pretrial review procedure, and then explain the principles, functions and purposes, under the guidance of the principles of participation in criminal litigation,transparency in criminal proceducel,procedural justice,preventing prejudge and litigation economy, playing the features of filter improper indictment, discovery, case diversion, prevent pretrial court judge to prejudge,to achieve the purpose of achieving the real trial, procedural justice,protection of human rights and the procedural efficiency;In the second chapter, comparison and reference for the criminal pretrial review procedure of England,American, France,Germany, will improve the criminal pretrial review procedure useful and reasonable basis; The third chapter introduce the existing legislation, analyze the existing problems and the reasons in our country;The forth chapter proposes specific ideas of the perfect criminal pretrial review procedure. Including the examination scope,body of review,body of participation,start of pretrial review,the content of review,the way of review,review result, relief mechanism. And this procedure also needs some corresponding necessary facilities to consummate, such as improvement the summary procedures and the establishment of discovery system.
全文共分为四章:第一章,刑事庭前审查程序的概论。首先对刑事庭前审查程序的概念加以界定,然后阐述刑事庭前审查程序的原则、功能和目的,在程序参与、程序公开、程序公正、控辩平等、诉讼经济原则的指导下,发挥过滤不当公诉、证据开示、案件分流、防止庭审法官庭前预断的功能,实现庭审实质化、程序公正、保障人权和提高诉讼效率的目的;第二章对英美和法德四个有代表性国家的庭前审查程序的立法规定进行比较和借鉴,为完善我国刑事庭前审查程序提供有益的借鉴和合理根据;第三章对刑事诉讼法关于我国现行刑事庭前审查程序立法规定的介绍,并结合其所存在的缺陷进行原因分析。第四章提出了完善我国刑事庭前审查程序的具体构想。包括庭前审查程序的适用范围、审查主体、参与主体、程序的启动、审查内容、审查方式、结果处理、救济机制。并进一步提出了为保障庭前审查程序的正常运行而所需的相关配套措施——完善简易程序和建立证据开示制度。
The criminal pretrial review procedure is between prosecution and the trial, connecting the prosecution and the trial,which is a necessary criminal proceeding. The research object of the article is criminal pretrial review procedure, in order to improve its conduct for the purpose, through introducing the criminal pretrial procedure in foreign countries, analyzing the existing problems in our country’s criminal pretrial review procedure, do some exploring to how perfect the criminal pretrial review procedure.
This article contains four chapters: the first chapter researches general outline of the criminal pretrial review procedure. Firstly, define the concept of criminal pretrial review procedure, and then explain the principles, functions and purposes, under the guidance of the principles of participation in criminal litigation,transparency in criminal proceducel,procedural justice,preventing prejudge and litigation economy, playing the features of filter improper indictment, discovery, case diversion, prevent pretrial court judge to prejudge,to achieve the purpose of achieving the real trial, procedural justice,protection of human rights and the procedural efficiency;In the second chapter, comparison and reference for the criminal pretrial review procedure of England,American, France,Germany, will improve the criminal pretrial review procedure useful and reasonable basis; The third chapter introduce the existing legislation, analyze the existing problems and the reasons in our country;The forth chapter proposes specific ideas of the perfect criminal pretrial review procedure. Including the examination scope,body of review,body of participation,start of pretrial review,the content of review,the way of review,review result, relief mechanism. And this procedure also needs some corresponding necessary facilities to consummate, such as improvement the summary procedures and the establishment of discovery system.
引文
[1]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3).
[2]宋英辉、孙长永、刘新魁等.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2006,66.
[3]王洪宇.论公诉案件庭前审查程序[J].现代法学,1999(10),83.
[4]格根图雅.试论我国刑事庭前审查程序及其特点和缺陷[J].内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版), 2006(1).
[5]张文显.二十世纪法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996,391.
[6]陈瑞华.刊事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997,61.
[7]谷口安平著,王亚新、刘荣军译.程序的正义与诉讼(增补本)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002,10.
[8]卞建林、李菁菁.从我国刑事法庭设置看刑事审判构造的完善[J].法学研究,2004(3),82.
[9]栾和丽.试谈诉讼经济原则.http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/2004_2/5/1310235463.htm. 2004-2-5 / 2010-3-3.
[10]武步云.马克思主义法哲学引论[M].陕西:陕西人民出版社,1992,279.
[11]陈学权.论刑事庭前审查程序[J].法治论丛,2003年(2),69.
[12]孟德斯鸠,张雁深译.论法的精神(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982,150.
[13] Bryan A. Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary [M].West Publishing Co.1979,418-419.
[14] Richard Allen Posner. An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence.Chicago:University of Chicago law School,1999,28-29.
[15]宋英辉、吴宏耀.刑事审判前程序研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002,27.
[16]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3),62.
[17]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3),62.
[18] Marvine Zalman & Larry Siegel.Criminal Procedure Constitution and Society[M], West Publishing Company, 1991,620.
[19]宋英辉、孙长永、刘新魁等.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2006,29.
[20]宋冰.读本:美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998,366.
[21]汪建成、黄伟明.欧盟成员国刑事诉讼概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000,212.
[22]范培根.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序之比较研究[J].法学论坛,2001(3),109.
[23]卞建林、刘玫.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008,214.
[24]中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心组织编译.英国刑事诉讼法(选编)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[25] Marvine Zalman & Larry Siegel: Criminal Procedure Constitution and Society.West Publishing Company, 1991,619.
[26]汪建成、黄伟明.欧盟成员国刑事诉讼概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003,150.
[27]赵汝琨.新刑事诉讼法通论[M].北京:警官教育出版社,1996,306.
[28]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3).
[29]刘根菊.刑事审判方式改革与案卷材料的移送[J].中国法学,1997(3),100.
[30]龙宗智.徘徊于传统与现代之间——论中国刑事诉讼法的再修改[J].政法论坛,2004(5).
[31]孟德平.论我国庭前审查程序的完善[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2001(1).
[32] Tocqueville.Democracy in America.New York:Colonial Press,1899,11-12.
[33]陈瑞华.刑事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997,10.
[34]陈卫东、李奋飞.刑事庭前审查程序改革研究.诉讼法学研究(第二卷)[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002, 152.
[35]宋世杰.外国刑事诉讼法比较研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2006,200.
[36] Bryan A. Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary [M].West Publishing Co.1979,418-419.
[37]李玉花、李和仁.聚焦程序公正——1999年全国诉讼法学年合综述[J].人民检察,2000(2).
[38]黄京平、王兆锋、赵坤辉.我国刑事证据展示的模式选择与制度建构[J].人民检察,2001 (7).
[39]陈卫东.刑事庭前审查程序研究. http://www.1488.com/china/Intolaws/LawPoint/Default.asp?ProgramID=22&pkNo=3885. 2006-10-23 / 2010-3-3.
[40]指南针司法考试研究中心.2008年司法考试必读法律法规汇编[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2008,146.
[2]宋英辉、孙长永、刘新魁等.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2006,66.
[3]王洪宇.论公诉案件庭前审查程序[J].现代法学,1999(10),83.
[4]格根图雅.试论我国刑事庭前审查程序及其特点和缺陷[J].内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版), 2006(1).
[5]张文显.二十世纪法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996,391.
[6]陈瑞华.刊事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997,61.
[7]谷口安平著,王亚新、刘荣军译.程序的正义与诉讼(增补本)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002,10.
[8]卞建林、李菁菁.从我国刑事法庭设置看刑事审判构造的完善[J].法学研究,2004(3),82.
[9]栾和丽.试谈诉讼经济原则.http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/2004_2/5/1310235463.htm. 2004-2-5 / 2010-3-3.
[10]武步云.马克思主义法哲学引论[M].陕西:陕西人民出版社,1992,279.
[11]陈学权.论刑事庭前审查程序[J].法治论丛,2003年(2),69.
[12]孟德斯鸠,张雁深译.论法的精神(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982,150.
[13] Bryan A. Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary [M].West Publishing Co.1979,418-419.
[14] Richard Allen Posner. An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence.Chicago:University of Chicago law School,1999,28-29.
[15]宋英辉、吴宏耀.刑事审判前程序研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002,27.
[16]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3),62.
[17]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3),62.
[18] Marvine Zalman & Larry Siegel.Criminal Procedure Constitution and Society[M], West Publishing Company, 1991,620.
[19]宋英辉、孙长永、刘新魁等.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2006,29.
[20]宋冰.读本:美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998,366.
[21]汪建成、黄伟明.欧盟成员国刑事诉讼概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000,212.
[22]范培根.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序之比较研究[J].法学论坛,2001(3),109.
[23]卞建林、刘玫.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008,214.
[24]中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心组织编译.英国刑事诉讼法(选编)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
[25] Marvine Zalman & Larry Siegel: Criminal Procedure Constitution and Society.West Publishing Company, 1991,619.
[26]汪建成、黄伟明.欧盟成员国刑事诉讼概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003,150.
[27]赵汝琨.新刑事诉讼法通论[M].北京:警官教育出版社,1996,306.
[28]龙宗智.刑事诉讼庭前审查程序研究[J].法学研究,1999(3).
[29]刘根菊.刑事审判方式改革与案卷材料的移送[J].中国法学,1997(3),100.
[30]龙宗智.徘徊于传统与现代之间——论中国刑事诉讼法的再修改[J].政法论坛,2004(5).
[31]孟德平.论我国庭前审查程序的完善[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2001(1).
[32] Tocqueville.Democracy in America.New York:Colonial Press,1899,11-12.
[33]陈瑞华.刑事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997,10.
[34]陈卫东、李奋飞.刑事庭前审查程序改革研究.诉讼法学研究(第二卷)[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002, 152.
[35]宋世杰.外国刑事诉讼法比较研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2006,200.
[36] Bryan A. Garner. Black’s Law Dictionary [M].West Publishing Co.1979,418-419.
[37]李玉花、李和仁.聚焦程序公正——1999年全国诉讼法学年合综述[J].人民检察,2000(2).
[38]黄京平、王兆锋、赵坤辉.我国刑事证据展示的模式选择与制度建构[J].人民检察,2001 (7).
[39]陈卫东.刑事庭前审查程序研究. http://www.1488.com/china/Intolaws/LawPoint/Default.asp?ProgramID=22&pkNo=3885. 2006-10-23 / 2010-3-3.
[40]指南针司法考试研究中心.2008年司法考试必读法律法规汇编[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2008,146.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |