用户名: 密码: 验证码:
矿山酸性废水预测评价方法
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:An overview of the methods of acid mine drainage prediction and evaluation
  • 作者:王晨昇 ; 姜大伟 ; 胡格吉乐吐 ; 柴星 ; 葸玉泽
  • 英文作者:WANG Chen-sheng;JIANG Da-wei;Hugejiletu;CHAI Xing;XI Yu-ze;Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources;Inner Mongolia Geological Exploration co.,Ltd;
  • 关键词:矿山酸性废水 ; 静态评价 ; 动态评价
  • 英文关键词:acid mine drainage;;static test methods;;kinetic test methods
  • 中文刊名:矿产勘查
  • 英文刊名:Mineral Exploration
  • 机构:北京矿产地研究院;内蒙古地质勘查有限责任公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-28
  • 出版单位:矿产勘查
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:中国地质调查局国家二级项目内蒙古赤峰有色金属基地综合地质调查(编号:DD20160072)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:290-294
  • 页数:5
  • CN:11-5875/TD
  • ISSN:1674-7801
  • 分类号:X751
摘要
酸性矿山废水是全球矿山面临的最严重的环境问题之一,预测酸性矿山废水对于预防、控制和治理金属矿山环境污染问题具有重要意义。目前预测方法分为现场短期实验、实验室静态评价、实验室动态评价和现场,文章探讨了静态评价和动态评价两类方法的优、缺点,并提出了进一步的研究设想。
        Acid mine drainage is one of the most serious environmental problems faced by global mines. The prediction of acid mine drainage is of great importance for the prevention, control and treatment of environmental pollution in metal mines.At present,prediction methods are divided into field laboratory static test and kinetic test. The advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are discussed, and further research ideas are proposed.
引文
Block F, Parsons S C, Williams R D, et al. 2011. The Acid Drainage Technology Initiativel[J]. Asmr Us.
    Chatwin T, Verburg R, Ferguson K. 2009. The GARD Guide is availablefor review online[J]. Mining Engineering, 28(12):838-846.
    Chotpantarat S. 2011. A review of static tests and recent studies[J]. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(4):400-406.
    González-Sandoval M R, Lizárraga-Mendiola L, Sánchez-Tovar S A, et al. Humidity cell tests:Effect of air flow and cycle duration in the quality of leachates.[C]//Securing the Future and 8th ICARD:Proceedings of theConference, Skelleftea, Sweden, 331-340.
    Hageman P L. U.S. 2007. Geological Survey field leach test for assessing water reactivity and leaching potential of mine wastes, soils, and other geologic and environmental materials[J]. U. s. geological Survey.
    Magdi H.CanmetMINING research plan 2016-2021 Green Mining Initiative[EB/OL]. 2016. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/rncan-nrcan/M154-107-2016-eng.pdf
    Morin K A, Hutt N M. 2012. On the Nonsense of Arguing the Superiority of an Analytical Method for Neutralization Potential[J]. Indian Journal of Perinatology&Reproductive Biology,2.
    Parbhakar-Fox A, Lottermoser B G. 2015. A critical review of acid rock drainage prediction methods and practices[J]. Minerals Engineering, 82:107-124.
    Verburg R, Bezuidenhout N, Chatwin T, et al. 2009. The Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide(GARD Guide)[J]. Mine Water&the Environment, 28(4):305-310.
    Weber P A, Thomas J E, Skinner W M, et al. 2005. A Methodology to Determine the Acid-Neutralization Capacity of Rock Samples[J].Canadian Mineralogist, 43(4):1183-1192.
    白润才,李彬,李三川,等.2015.矿山酸性废水处理技术现状及进展[J].长江科学院院报,32(2):14-19.
    常冬寅,程从坤,张红梅,等.2013.矿山废弃地重金属污染及酸性废水防治分析——以铜陵新桥硫铁矿为例[J].中国国土资源经济,(9):35-40.
    陈天虎,冯军会,徐晓春.2001.国外尾矿酸性排水和重金属淋滤作用研究进展[J].环境工程学报,2(2):41-46.
    陈莹,陈炳辉,邹琦,等.2018.粤北大宝山AMD水-表层沉积物的重金属分布特征及其影响因素[J].环境科学学报,38(1):133-141.
    韩玉立,王琼,韩烈保.2015.德兴铜矿不同年份废石产酸规律研究[J].环境科学学报,35(3):805-811.
    李锦文,吴惠明,陈永亨.2008.矿山酸性排水静态预测与评价[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),No.40(4):60-63.
    刘成.2001.德兴铜矿酸性废水成因的研究[J].中国矿山工程,30(4):49-53.
    宁增平,肖唐付,周连碧,等.2009.锑矿区酸性岩排水产生潜力预测研究[J].地球与环境,37(3):249-253.
    邱伟军.2014.金属矿山酸性废水的预防及控制[J].黄金,(3):73-76.
    孙亚乔,杨茜,段磊,等.2018.韩城煤矸石产酸潜能分析[J].煤炭转化,(1):72-79.
    王飞,雷良奇,宋慈安,等.2008.金属硫化矿固废泄酸能力评价方法初探[C]//合作发展创新——2008.
    吴惠明,李晓,李锦文,等.2014.模拟风化过程硫铁矿尾矿的产酸性及污染物的释放行为[J].环境化学,33(3).
    徐晓春,牛杏杏,黄界颖.2010.安徽铜陵凤凰山矿尾矿产酸能力和酸中和潜力分析[J].矿床地质,29(s1):813-814.
    周大俊,李勇兵.1992.七宝山硫铁矿矿坑废水的硫化法处理试验[J].湘潭大学自然科学学报,(4):12-14.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700