结构功能主义视角下绿色技术国际合作中知识产权治理研究——以NZEC CCS项目为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on the Governance of Intellectual Property in the International Cooperation of Green Technology from the Perspective of Functional Structuralism——Taking NZEC CCS Program as an Example 作者：冯灵 ; 余翔 英文作者：Feng Ling;Yu Xiang;School of Economics & Management and Law, Hubei Normal University;School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 关键词：绿色技术 ; 国际合作 ; 知识产权治理 ; 结构功能主义 英文关键词：green technology;;international cooperation;;intellectual property governance;;structural functionalism 中文刊名：林业经济 英文刊名：Forestry Economics 机构：湖北师范大学经济管理与法学院;华中科技大学管理学院; 出版日期：2019-08-25 出版单位：林业经济 年：2019 期：08 基金：国家自然科学基金“专利分散对我国战略性新兴产业自主创新的影响机理及政策选择研究”（编号：71373088） 语种：中文; 页：103-108+120 页数：7 CN：11-5390/S ISSN：1673-338X 分类号：F204;X322;F113.3

摘要

发展绿色技术、共同应对全球气候非正常变化,是世界各国的共同需求。绿色低碳技术国际合作因其参与主体的多层次以及多元化特征,导致知识产权问题错综复杂,知识产权风险迫切需要得到治理。文章以中欧煤炭技术近零排放合作项目(NZEC)为例,在分析绿色技术国际合作知识产权治理驱动因素的基础上,对知识产权治理进行结构功能分析。通过适应功能、目标达成功能、整合功能和维持功能4个方面的分析和解读,认为绿色技术国际合作中的知识产权治理应从"管理—控制"转变为协商手段。有效知识产权治理目标的达成,需要通过法律协调、契约规制、利益机制构建来实现。
        The development of green technologies and common responses to the abnormal changes in the global climate are the common needs of all countries in the world. Because of the multi-level and diversified characteristics of its participation subjects, the international cooperation of green and low carbon technology leads to the complexity of intellectual property rights, and the risk of intellectual property rights is urgently needed to be controlled. Taking NIEC as an exemples, based on the analysis of the driving factors of intellectual property rights governance in green technology international cooperation, this paper analyzed the structure and function of intellectual property governance. Through the analysis and interpretation of four aspects of adaptation function, goal achievement, integration function and maintenance function, it was considered that intellectual property governance in green technology international cooperation should be transformed from"management-control"to negotiation. The goal of effective intellectual property management should be achieved through legal coordination, contract regulation and interest mechanism construction.

引文

陈健雄,徐翔.国际技术合作的动因及其理论解释[J].国际经济合作,2009(12):19
    陈琼娣,余翔.若干国家绿色专利加速审查的实践及启示[J].中国科技论坛,2013(2):147~153
    陈政澳，李琦，张贤.欧洲能源复兴计划CCS示范项目实施进展与启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2013,23(10):81~86
    法帼蓉.科研机构国际合作研究项目知识产权归属问题浅析[J].生命的化学,2013,33(4):483~486
    郭永辉,郭会梅.合作创新中的知识产权问题研究[J].中国科技论坛,2010(9):40~44
    赫敏.《巴黎协定》后气候有益技术的知识产权前景探析[J].知识产权,2017(3):93~98
    胡正昌.公共治理理论及其政府治理模式的转变[J].前沿,2008(5):90~93
    刘珊,余翔.基于TMP的中美清洁能源合作知识产权管理模式研究[J].中国软科学,2016(11):44~51
    刘雪凤,许超.知识产权全球治理的结构功能主义解读[J].中国行政管理,2011(9):81~84
    秦天宝,周琛.国际环境技术转让的法律障碍及其克服[J].江西社会科学,2011(3):161~169
    宋河发,李振兴.影响制约科技成果转化和知识产权运用的问题分析与对策研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,29(5):548~557
    王明远,汪安娜.绿色技术专利权社会化:缘起、表现、争议与出路[J].政法论坛,2017,35(2):20~30
    张艳梅.知识产权全球治理的现实困境与路径构建--以传统知识保护为研究视角[J].求索,2015(5):76~81
    赵筱媛,等.863计划利益主体的知识产权平衡机制研究[J].科研管理,2008,29(4):151~156
    Geroski P A.Markets for Technology:Knowledge,Innovation and Appropriability[J].Handbook of the Economics of Innovation&Technological Change,1995,54(171):115~128
    Jaffe A B,Newell R G,Stavins R N.A Tale of Two Market Failures:Technology and Environmental Policy[J].Ecological Economics,2004,54(2):164~174
    Lewis J I,Wiser R H.Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry:An International Comparison of Wind Industry Policy Support Mechanisms[J].Energy Policy,2007(35):1844~1857
    Lewis J I.Green Innovation in China:China’s Wind Power Industry and the Global Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy[M].Columbia University Press,2012
    Parsons T.The social system[J].American Sociological Review,1951,56(3):499~502
    Peter K Yu.Intellectual Propertygeographies[J].The WIPO Journal,2014,6(1):11
    TERI.Emerging Asia Contribution on Issues of Technology for Copenhagen[R].New Delhi:The Energy and Resources Institute,2009:66
    Todd R.Miller,Dawn M.Amos.Cleantech Innovators should Be Aware of Certain Global Intellectual Property Issues[J].Intellectual Property&Technology Law Journal,2010,22(5):1~6
    UNEP,EPO and ICTSD.Patents and Clean Energy:Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Policy:Final Report[R].Geneva,Munich,2010:9