三种国标方法在铜陵某苯酐生产企业职业健康风险评估中的应用

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Application of three GB methods in occupational health risk assessment of a phthalic anhydride production enterprise in Tongling 作者：吴成峰 ; 胡志平 ; 丁士旵 ; 张乾驰 英文作者：WU Chengfeng;HU Zhiping;DING Shichan;ZHANG Qianchi;Tongling Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 关键词：接触比值法 ; 接触指数法 ; 综合指数法 ; 职业健康 ; 风险评估 英文关键词：Exposure ratio method;;Exposure index method;;Comprehensive index method;;Occupational health;;Risk assessment 中文刊名：安徽预防医学杂志 英文刊名：Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine 机构：铜陵市疾病预防控制中心; 出版日期：2019-02-20 出版单位：安徽预防医学杂志 年：2019 期：01 语种：中文; 页：22-25 页数：4 CN：34-1154/R ISSN：1007-1040 分类号：R13

摘要

目的评估铜陵某苯酐生产企业工作场所化学有害因素职业健康风险,探讨三种职业健康风险评估方法的应用。方法收集铜陵某苯酐生产企业工作场所化学有害因素检测结果和职业卫生调查结果,应用接触比值法、接触指数法和综合指数法三种方法进行职业健康风险评估。结果氧化巡检岗位萘浓度达15.4 mg/m~3,苯酐包装和成品装车岗位苯酐浓度达0.19 mg/m~3,为职业健康中等风险岗位,三种方法之间的Kendall’Tb系数分别为0.632、0.447、0.707,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),一致性较好。结论三种方法能客观评估工作场所化学有害因素职业健康风险,应优先使用综合指数法,对指导企业采取控制职业危害措施,降低职业健康风险具有重要意义。
        Objective To assess the occupational health risks of chemical hazards in the workplace of a phthalic anhydride production enterprise in Tongling, and to explore the application of three occupational health risk assessment Methods.Methods The results of chemical harmful factors and occupational health survey in a phthalic anhydride production enterprise in Tongling were collected. The occupational health risk assessment was carried out by three Methods:contact ratio method, contact index method and comprehensive index method.Results The concentration of naphthalene in oxidation inspection posts was 15.4 mg/m~3, and that in phthalic anhydride packaging and product loading posts was 0.19 mg/m~3, which was a middle-risk post of occupational health. The Kendall'Tb coefficients of the three methods were 0.632, 0.447 and 0.707, respectively. There was no significant difference(P> 0.05), and the consistency was good.Conclusion The three methods can objectively assess the occupational health risk of chemical hazards in the workplace, and the comprehensive index method should be given priority. It is of great significance to guide enterprises to take measures to control occupational hazards and reduce occupational health risks.

引文

[1] 章剑,施爱民,陈献文,等.半定量职业危害风险评估法在某市电焊行业锰危害因素评价中的应用[J].中国工业医学杂志,2014,27(04):310-311.
    [2] 王丽华,戴志腾,冯晶.半定量法在深圳市某电路板生产企业职业病危害风险评估中的应用[J].职业与健康,2016,32(13):1729-1731.
    [3] 王爱红,冷朋波,边国林,等.半定量风险评估技术在木质家具企业职业健康风险评估中的应用[J].中国预防医学杂志,2016,17(1):37-40.
    [4] 伍波,李铭,程秀荣,等.接苯企业职业健康风险评估[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(5):755-758.
    [5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GBZT 298-2017 工作场所化学有害因素职业健康风险评估技术导则.北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
    [6] 王志平,郑文慧,肖国兵.某企业职业病危害的半定量风险评估[J].环境与职业医学,2013,30(9):686-689.
    [7] 姚丹丹.化工厂外协单位工人职业卫生知识及防护情况调查[J].工业卫生与职业病,2015,41(2):135-136,139.
    [8] 翁少凡,王丽华.半定量法在深圳市某印刷厂职业病危害风险评估中的应用[J].职业与健康,2016,32(14):1882-1884.
    [9] 叶飞,邢杨,刘冰冰,等.3种职业健康风险评估方法对比分析[J].职业与健康,2018,34(8):1012-1016.
    [10] 袁伟明,冷朋波,周莉芳,等.应用国外两种风险模型评估职业危害的对比研究[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(1):51-55.
    [11] 陈林,钱秀荣,赵都,等.三种职业健康风险评估方法在某铅酸蓄电池企业中应用比较[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(6):849-853.
    [12] 叶飞,杨琳,张维,等.北京市陶瓷生产及耐火材料制造行业尘肺病危害风险评估[J].职业与健康,2018,34(14):1873-1876,1880.